me too.....only with these public forces this type of " bulldoze  everything" dev can be exposed and punished

there is only one reason that so many people are being victimsed and people's hard earned money is being throw into the river

GREED....look at their cars, assets , lifestyles...etc etc all in the expense of these pityful victims

on a side note....THE MAIN hand behind this is the Selangor govt that so many of u voted
without the local authority cover up the dev will never escape all these

a) From what i see is, that not his unit but all the reminders from developer is to his email add... looks weird...

b) As i got the news from my frn, Mr Lim took construction lift (which is the lift including the 3 lvls of podium floor), means if unit is in 18th floor.. 18+3 = 21 floor. If passenger lift (not including the 3 lvls of podium floor), of course press 18th floor no prob. ** not many people knows the difference of construction lift and passenger lift **

c) Related back to (B), means that is not the actual unit & floor. Obviously he went to wrong floor, aiks! 

I'm not helping any side, just as profession practice architect here. Need to correct something if that possible is cause all these happened

They can if they want to, all depend on the clauses inside the non-standard SPA of the deal. 

good question.

my guess sure protect MEH 

yes another LOD sent via different lawyer to Mr lim again within 3 days 

actually ah, just asking.
are there any recourse for purchasers to back up from the purchase prior to vp?
new hda spa have a clause on withdrawal even after signing with some penalties.

think what he is trying to say is, 2 wrongs don't make a right.

if you pay, you can fault them for not maintaining the building (irrespective in whatever condition).
if you don't pay, then they have every right to blame you for not enabling them to do so.

imagine they cut off the lights to all common areas. jialat.

guys side track a bit to clarify:

in HDA and in SNP there is clause describing the completion of common facilities stating that the commong facilities of the development shall be completed by Vendor within 36 calendar months from the date of agreeement (SNP). The vendor architect shall certify the date of completion of common facilities.

If the vendor fails to complete the common facilities in time, vendor shall pay immediatelyto purchaser liquidated damages to be calculated from the day of the rate of 10% per annum of the last 20% of the purchase price.

Is the Completion of Common facilities tied to the VP? if the VP obtained late, does this mean purchaser have the right to ask for the LAD including common facilities with the same duration?

is that a common understanding or is there anywhere i can refer too in the HDA?

LAD for the Parcel (unit) is clearly tied to VP in the SNP. But for common facilities is tied to Vendor's architect cetification of completion. Anybody can explain about architect certification of completion for common facilities vs VP for the parcel?