Outline ·
[ Standard ] ·
Linear+
AMD Bulldozer & Bobcat
|
xcen
|
Jul 13 2011, 06:00 PM
|
|
QUOTE(dma0991 @ Jul 13 2011, 05:38 PM) Believe such news with a grain of salt. There are no official results yet and anyone skilled with photo editing can easily fake results. By September hopefully we will have some numbers that are legit. Yeah... true. Really anxious to see BD's performance. Not planning to buy the desktop, but planning to get Trinity next year if it's good.
|
|
|
|
|
|
shojikun
|
Jul 13 2011, 06:03 PM
|
|
can't wait for september to change my 1100T  already bought AM3+ ready M/B xD
|
|
|
|
|
|
RegentCid
|
Jul 13 2011, 10:45 PM
|
|
those current water cooling such as Corsair H50 / 70 or CoolIt ALC can install to this FM1 socket mobo?
|
|
|
|
|
|
dma0991
|
Jul 13 2011, 11:19 PM
|
|
QUOTE(RegentCid @ Jul 13 2011, 10:45 PM) those current water cooling such as Corsair H50 / 70 or CoolIt ALC can install to this FM1 socket mobo? IIANM FM1 has the same hole spacing like AM3 and the newer AM3+ so it is possible to reuse from AM3 kits.
|
|
|
|
|
|
HoNeYdEwBoY
|
Jul 14 2011, 09:07 AM
|
|
so this mean i can use hyper 212+ on FM1 socket also?
|
|
|
|
|
|
StratOS
|
Jul 14 2011, 10:42 AM
|
|
confirm can.. i have a a asus FM1 mobo in my shop now and we checked s.. any cooler with amd bracket can be used back.
|
|
|
|
|
|
peter32
|
Jul 14 2011, 05:12 PM
|
|
I just got myself a simple A6 llano with Gigabyte GA-A75m-D2H. Not for gaming, but HTPC with occasional video editing capability.
The stock CPU fan is noisy. Just read that the AM2-3 cpu fan can also be used here. Is there any passive cpu cooler that is available here locally ? I did earlier read about the thermalright HR-02 passive cooled, but i suspect my casing may not fit it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
shinjite
|
Jul 14 2011, 08:36 PM
|
|
QUOTE(kingkingyyk @ Jul 14 2011, 08:29 PM) » Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «   ? Interesting
|
|
|
|
|
|
FullMetalBoy
|
Jul 14 2011, 08:39 PM
|
Getting Started

|
bulldozer ocoverclocking bulldozer without increasing the multiplier. seems like bulldozer aint like llano which have multiplier bug. the chip is strong! the link is in czech edit-they have removed the page This post has been edited by FullMetalBoy: Jul 15 2011, 09:13 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
renz496
|
Jul 16 2011, 05:01 PM
|
|
lol too many rumor right now. AMD announced before the proc will come out in 60-90 day in june (so the worst case we will see the proc in public around september) right now some rumor suggest the launch is puch back to october: http://www.nordichardware.com/news/69-cpu-...or-october.html
|
|
|
|
|
|
saturn85
|
Jul 17 2011, 02:44 AM
|
|
QUOTE(renz496 @ Jul 16 2011, 05:01 PM) lol too many rumor right now. AMD announced before the proc will come out in 60-90 day in june (so the worst case we will see the proc in public around september) right now some rumor suggest the launch is puch back to october: http://www.nordichardware.com/news/69-cpu-...or-october.htmloctober.. keep delay..
|
|
|
|
|
|
lex
|
Jul 18 2011, 04:41 AM
|
Old Am I?
|
QUOTE(kingkingyyk @ Jul 11 2011, 09:11 PM) No gaming test yet.  Hopefully it is as fast as i5-2500 in gaming.Woops, faster than i7 2600K in 3DMark. AMD claims the performance clown again? Fake again (by OBR). Quote from Bulldozer prototype suggests AMD shooting for Sandy Bridge performance... QUOTE Editor's note: The original source of the information that Donanim Haber published this week on the alleged AMD Bulldozer engineering sample has admitted that the information was faked. Many sites were fooled by this information, including Ars, particularly because the results were plausible and fit the information we had about Bulldozer so far. The joker's admission here OBRovsky Blog: You were PUNKD!.
|
|
|
|
|
|
dma0991
|
Jul 18 2011, 04:02 PM
|
|
QUOTE(lex @ Jul 18 2011, 04:41 AM) That's why I never posted any news regarding this when I knew the source was from OBR. Many said he is a fake long before Bulldozer so I concluded that the Bulldozer results were never real. Apparently he is a die hard Intel fanboy therefore he trolls AMD fanboys by releasing fake benches and give false hope.
|
|
|
|
|
|
xcen
|
Jul 18 2011, 07:12 PM
|
|
Such a sad little kid.
Llano laptops are not rolling out in Malaysia fast enough... hmm...
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vascor
|
Jul 18 2011, 09:34 PM
|
New Member
|
Actually if those results are for real I think AMD is more than willing to leak them
|
|
|
|
|
|
AlamakLor
|
Jul 18 2011, 09:38 PM
|
Look at all my stars!!
|
And if they really could beat Intel, they wouldn't have to constantly delay the launch. All these delays will put AMD in an even worse position as the release date of first gen BD is getting so close to Intel's IB release date. Intel will once again destroy AMD shortly after BD gets released....sad
|
|
|
|
|
|
dma0991
|
Jul 18 2011, 10:18 PM
|
|
QUOTE(AlamakLor @ Jul 18 2011, 09:38 PM) And if they really could beat Intel, they wouldn't have to constantly delay the launch. All these delays will put AMD in an even worse position as the release date of first gen BD is getting so close to Intel's IB release date. Intel will once again destroy AMD shortly after BD gets released....sad It was pointed out that there could be a possibility that BD was never delayed and it is 'delayed' due to the fact that AMD is production constrained and the 32nm fab is full steam for the past few months for Llano release. AMD does not have a fab of their own and GF is actually pretty small compared to TSMC, therefore it is more likely that it is production constrained. The 60-90 days could be an indication that they were just beginning to mass produce and package BD for August-October launch. That is why I mentioned before that even if BD is what it thought to be and it totally destroyed SB in every single test it won't be able to be a huge hit due to the fact that GF is small and cannot meet the demands like Intel could with their fabs. That could also be the reason that Intel might not budge SB pricing even if BD were to come out because Intel knows that AMD is production constrained and cannot exceed 20% of the market's demand.
|
|
|
|
|
|
kingkingyyk
|
Jul 18 2011, 11:31 PM
|
10k Club
|
Asus Fusion mobo lineup : http://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/AMD/A8-...ormance/12.htmlPretty unbiased review, unlike the 1 from nanatek.
|
|
|
|
|
|
yinchet
|
Jul 18 2011, 11:36 PM
|
If you wish for peace, prepare for war
|
^ all PCI-E 2.0?? hope they come up with PCI-E 3.0 for more future proof.
|
|
|
|
|