Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Bump Topic Add Reply RSS Feed
113 Pages « < 77 78 79 80 81 > » Bottom

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 Intel® Core™2 Duo/Quad Overhauled Rev. 4, The journey continues...

views
     
iBenQ
post Mar 23 2009, 01:55 AM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,550 posts

Joined: Aug 2008
tried stock vcore... 3.8ghz max sad.gif


Attached thumbnail(s)
Attached Image
ejad_3100
post Mar 23 2009, 03:40 AM

New Member
*
Junior Member
5 posts

Joined: Mar 2008
CPU : C2D E8400
CPU clockspeed : 4.500Ghz
Motherboard : Abit IP35-P
RAM model : CRUCIAL BALLISTIX PC2 6400
RAM capacity : 1GB X 4
RAM speed : 500MHz, 5-5-5-15
RAM mode : Dual channel
Cooler : Xigmatek Achilles + Crossbow Kit
Time:10.407's

Attached Image

This post has been edited by ejad_3100: Mar 23 2009, 03:41 AM
clawhammer
post Mar 23 2009, 04:35 AM

///M
Group Icon
VIP
8,788 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Kuala Lumpur
Why not you post your stable settings instead? smile.gif
uzairi
post Mar 23 2009, 04:53 AM

Team almostthere
*******
Senior Member
6,744 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: World Wide Web Status: Banned
QUOTE(iBenQ @ Mar 16 2009, 02:34 AM)
decided to post one of my ss during stress test biggrin.gif

@uzairi, where's ur template? cannot find la hahaha
*
template missing after the rollback doh.gif

QUOTE(iBenQ @ Mar 23 2009, 01:55 AM)
tried stock vcore... 3.8ghz max sad.gif
*
ok what 3.8ghz, stable ? hmm.gif
iBenQ
post Mar 23 2009, 05:03 AM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,550 posts

Joined: Aug 2008
QUOTE(uzairi @ Mar 23 2009, 04:53 AM)
template missing after the rollback doh.gif
ok what 3.8ghz, stable  ?  hmm.gif
*
yerp stable... look at the linx biggrin.gif
REZ
post Mar 23 2009, 08:34 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
149 posts

Joined: Nov 2008
From: KK-Sabah
QUOTE(ejad_3100 @ Mar 23 2009, 03:40 AM)
CPU : C2D E8400
CPU clockspeed : 4.500Ghz
Motherboard : Abit IP35-P
RAM model : CRUCIAL BALLISTIX PC2 6400
RAM capacity : 1GB X 4
RAM speed : 500MHz, 5-5-5-15
RAM mode : Dual channel
Cooler : Xigmatek Achilles + Crossbow Kit
Time:10.407's

Attached Image
*
Is it non pro Abit version? orange pcb 1?
dro
post Mar 25 2009, 07:23 PM

N00B1E5
****
Senior Member
558 posts

Joined: Jun 2006
From: KL Sentral - Segamat
none pro version thereee

nice oc there mate
care to share your settings? smile.gif
hengmy
post Mar 26 2009, 04:55 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,991 posts

Joined: Jan 2007
From: Seri Kembangan
QUOTE(iBenQ @ Mar 23 2009, 05:03 AM)
yerp stable... look at the linx biggrin.gif
*
mayb u should try prime95 as well, because quadcore are not so suitable to test with linx, due to it can process much more faster than dualcore.
hilmiangah
post Mar 26 2009, 06:13 PM

Kongsi Gelap Elite Ramadass
Group Icon
Elite
5,602 posts

Joined: Jul 2007
From: The Holiest Of Hole
naise oc there on the same mobo as mine.
uzairi
post Mar 26 2009, 08:54 PM

Team almostthere
*******
Senior Member
6,744 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: World Wide Web Status: Banned
QUOTE(hengmy @ Mar 26 2009, 04:55 PM)
mayb u should try prime95 as well, because quadcore are not so suitable to test with linx, due to it can process much more faster than dualcore.
*
Its the same bro, clock to clock. smile.gif Only differences are in multi core/tasking job smile.gif
shaun3230
post Mar 26 2009, 09:33 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,369 posts

Joined: Aug 2008
Well, i use P95 to test for stability
clawhammer
post Mar 27 2009, 03:51 AM

///M
Group Icon
VIP
8,788 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Kuala Lumpur
Prime95 or Orthos works fine smile.gif I'm not sure if there are any new ones though (which is as common/good).
uzairi
post Mar 27 2009, 10:13 AM

Team almostthere
*******
Senior Member
6,744 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: World Wide Web Status: Banned
For Intel, better still IBT or LinX.
shaun3230
post Mar 29 2009, 09:25 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,369 posts

Joined: Aug 2008
Never heard of what uzairi said before huh.gif

Heard of othros though
B u B u
post Mar 29 2009, 01:44 PM

chill
******
Senior Member
1,479 posts

Joined: Nov 2008
i would really like to try the overclockability of my qx6800,asus p5ql-pro,kvd 4gb ddr2-800(2gbx2)...but even after reading all the guides,i still have no idea...

anyone mind guiding me?

TQ
hilmiangah
post Mar 29 2009, 09:28 PM

Kongsi Gelap Elite Ramadass
Group Icon
Elite
5,602 posts

Joined: Jul 2007
From: The Holiest Of Hole
follow cstkl1 guide and u'll know if its stable enough.
hengmy
post Mar 29 2009, 10:14 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,991 posts

Joined: Jan 2007
From: Seri Kembangan
QUOTE(uzairi @ Mar 26 2009, 08:54 PM)
Its the same bro, clock to clock. smile.gif Only differences are in multi core/tasking job  smile.gif
*
it was not same, in intel quadcore, i have tried before..
let say at 4ghz clock, if u use 1600mb of memory, a quadcore will finish 1 loop of ibt test at around 3x sec, while a dualcore will need 7x sec.
as u all know when using ibt, the processor will go back to idle before start to calculate another loop, so the quadcore might not fail in the 1st 3x sec and back to idle again.
i have tried a quad can easily pass ibt test at lower voltage easily, but failed in prime95 within 1 hour smile.gif
OC4/3
post Mar 29 2009, 11:24 PM

.
Group Icon
Elite
4,746 posts

Joined: Dec 2007
From: Speed rule
QUOTE(hengmy @ Mar 29 2009, 10:14 PM)
it was not same, in intel quadcore, i have tried before..
let say at 4ghz clock, if u use 1600mb of memory, a quadcore will finish 1 loop of ibt test at around 3x sec, while a dualcore will need 7x sec.
as u all know when using ibt, the processor will go back to idle before start to calculate another loop, so the quadcore might not fail in the 1st 3x sec and back to idle again.
i have tried a quad can easily pass ibt test at lower voltage easily, but failed in prime95 within 1 hour smile.gif
*
IBT=Multithreaded mar smile.gif
Hmmm could it be due to your ram?? wink.gif
Could be MCH also
iBenQ
post Mar 29 2009, 11:29 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,550 posts

Joined: Aug 2008
QUOTE(uzairi @ Mar 27 2009, 10:13 AM)
For Intel, better still IBT or LinX.
*
QUOTE(hengmy @ Mar 29 2009, 10:14 PM)
it was not same, in intel quadcore, i have tried before..
let say at 4ghz clock, if u use 1600mb of memory, a quadcore will finish 1 loop of ibt test at around 3x sec, while a dualcore will need 7x sec.
as u all know when using ibt, the processor will go back to idle before start to calculate another loop, so the quadcore might not fail in the 1st 3x sec and back to idle again.
i have tried a quad can easily pass ibt test at lower voltage easily, but failed in prime95 within 1 hour smile.gif
*
prime95 cant give as much heat as LinX in my case... dats y i ditched prime95 and use linx to test stability and load temp... if stable in linx, im damn sure p95 wil be stable, and if linx give xx temp, im damn sure p95 will give lower temp results biggrin.gif
hengmy
post Mar 29 2009, 11:30 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,991 posts

Joined: Jan 2007
From: Seri Kembangan
QUOTE(OC4/3 @ Mar 29 2009, 11:24 PM)
IBT=Multithreaded mar smile.gif
Hmmm could it be due to your ram?? wink.gif
Could be MCH also
*
yea, it chould be insufficient vnb, vdimm or vcore, but sometime it able to pass ibt 10-20 loops, but not prime95.
« Next Oldest · Overclockers United · Next Newest »
 

113 Pages « < 77 78 79 80 81 > » Top
Add ReplyOptions
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
 0.0311sec    0.94    6 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 20th December 2025 - 02:21 PM
All Rights Reserved © 2002- 2025 Vijandren Ramadass (~unite against racism~)
Removal Request
Powered by Invision Power Board © 2025  IPS, Inc.