Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Bump Topic Topic Closed RSS Feed
119 Pages « < 24 25 26 27 28 > » Bottom

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 The Solid State Storage Thread

views
     
TSjinaun
post Dec 23 2010, 11:01 AM

where are my stars???
Group Icon
Elite
6,139 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
QUOTE(0168257061 @ Dec 23 2010, 10:41 AM)
so the ssd eventually die after reaching its limit ?
then have to RMA ? sleep.gif
*
well.. intel gives 3 years warranty for its SSD, so technically it should be able to last at least 3 years to 5 years
SUSromentheposmen
post Dec 23 2010, 06:25 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
66 posts

Joined: Dec 2010


QUOTE(0168257061 @ Dec 22 2010, 09:17 PM)
very low  sad.gif
*
low ah? you can write 4GB a day everyday for 5 years. by the time the write cycles are used up you can get an SSD for a quarter of the price and twice the size already.
kaiserreich
post Dec 23 2010, 09:20 PM

Pendekar Papan Kekunci
*******
Senior Member
4,234 posts

Joined: Sep 2006
QUOTE(yshiuan @ Dec 22 2010, 11:03 PM)
any harm if torrent using ssd? tongue.gif
*
Seeding is okay.

Downloading however, you're going to wear out your drive with all those small writes.
owikh84
post Dec 23 2010, 10:58 PM

i7 Clan
Group Icon
Elite
8,711 posts

Joined: Nov 2007
From: Butterworth, PG / Machang, Kelantan



QUOTE(jinaun @ Dec 23 2010, 11:01 AM)
well.. intel gives 3 years warranty for its SSD,  so technically it should be able to last at least 3 years to 5 years
*
3 years of usage perhaps. well the lifespan is too subjective IMO.
some ppl get it damaged in merely 5 years, some in less than 3 years. Like other parts nia..
no one can really expect when he's going to die or live
SUSromentheposmen
post Dec 24 2010, 12:40 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
66 posts

Joined: Dec 2010


QUOTE(owikh84 @ Dec 23 2010, 10:58 PM)
3 years of usage perhaps. well the lifespan is too subjective IMO.
some ppl get it damaged in merely 5 years, some in less than 3 years. Like other parts nia..
no one can really expect when he's going to die or live
*
wah, this really scares me. the stated mtbf is 1.2 million hours but i've heard the failure rate for a drive is 0.5% which is pretty high.
lingloong
post Dec 24 2010, 01:09 AM

# Noob In Trading #
******
Senior Member
1,256 posts

Joined: Aug 2007
From: Ampang TO Sibu


QUOTE(romentheposmen @ Dec 24 2010, 12:40 AM)
wah, this really scares me. the stated mtbf is 1.2 million hours but i've heard the failure rate for a drive is 0.5% which is pretty high.
*
Nothing "figurative" in PC hardware especially drive biggrin.gif

For me, all depend on luck, usage and how you take care of it wink.gif

clawhammer
post Dec 24 2010, 04:40 AM

///M
Group Icon
VIP
8,788 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Kuala Lumpur




QUOTE(romentheposmen @ Dec 24 2010, 12:40 AM)
wah, this really scares me. the stated mtbf is 1.2 million hours but i've heard the failure rate for a drive is 0.5% which is pretty high.
*
Don't listen to myths smile.gif The current Intel SSD is not even in the market for 5 years so how on earth can someone come up with a baseless assumption as such? In 2005, there aren't any SSD's for sale in Malaysia at the first place.

This post has been edited by clawhammer: Dec 24 2010, 04:53 AM
SUSedmunz
post Dec 24 2010, 04:50 AM

dupe buster..since 2010
*****
Senior Member
900 posts

Joined: Nov 2008
From: world of siham



usually you all use sata2 or sata3 port for the SSD?
owikh84
post Dec 24 2010, 07:10 AM

i7 Clan
Group Icon
Elite
8,711 posts

Joined: Nov 2007
From: Butterworth, PG / Machang, Kelantan



QUOTE(edmunz @ Dec 24 2010, 04:50 AM)
usually you all use sata2 or sata3 port for the SSD?
*
anyone will do, I'm using SATA2 port smile.gif
SATA2 SSD wont get the full capability of the SATA3 port; and wont have full capability of a SATA3 SSD if the port is SATA2


Added on December 24, 2010, 7:11 am
QUOTE(lingloong @ Dec 24 2010, 01:09 AM)
Nothing "figurative" in PC hardware especially drive  biggrin.gif

For me, all depend on luck, usage and how you take care of it  wink.gif

*
thumbup.gif

This post has been edited by owikh84: Dec 24 2010, 07:11 AM
stimix
post Jan 4 2011, 11:01 AM

Dunno
Group Icon
Moderator
3,542 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Puchong, Selangor



Can someone share your Windows 7 experience index on your SSD?

I got got a new Mushkin (but only 40GB) got 7.7 score out of the max 7.9. Anyone got max of 7.9?
edministrator
post Jan 4 2011, 11:51 AM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,940 posts

Joined: Nov 2004
From: Soviet Sarawak


QUOTE(stimix @ Jan 4 2011, 11:01 AM)
Can someone share your Windows 7 experience index on your SSD?

I got got a new Mushkin (but only 40GB) got 7.7 score out of the max 7.9. Anyone got max of 7.9?
*
you'll get 7.9 in RAID0.
stimix
post Jan 4 2011, 12:18 PM

Dunno
Group Icon
Moderator
3,542 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Puchong, Selangor



huh? sure kah RAID HDD faster than SSD..like dat regret liao..
JinXXX
post Jan 4 2011, 01:38 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,516 posts

Joined: Feb 2007
From: Uarla Umpur



QUOTE(stimix @ Jan 4 2011, 12:18 PM)
huh? sure kah RAID HDD faster than SSD..like dat regret liao..
*
RAID SSD ?? tongue.gif or
using those PCIE SSD CARD.. with like 8 channel raid or what.. tongue.gif
edministrator
post Jan 4 2011, 01:58 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,940 posts

Joined: Nov 2004
From: Soviet Sarawak


QUOTE(stimix @ Jan 4 2011, 12:18 PM)
huh? sure kah RAID HDD faster than SSD..like dat regret liao..
*
QUOTE(JinXXX @ Jan 4 2011, 01:38 PM)
RAID SSD ?? tongue.gif or
using those PCIE SSD CARD.. with like 8 channel raid or what.. tongue.gif
*
i meant RAID 0 the SSD icon_rolleyes.gif
clawhammer
post Jan 4 2011, 02:05 PM

///M
Group Icon
VIP
8,788 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Kuala Lumpur




RAID-0 SSD will give you awesome benchmark scores but in real life performance it isn't so substantial. The thing that makes the SSD fast is because of the low random access times so even if you RAID-0, the random access times remains more or less the same at +/- 0.1ms. The only advantage is the added read speed.

In short, you can feel more difference doing a 2 disks RAID-0 on Raptors than SSD's.
owikh84
post Jan 4 2011, 10:31 PM

i7 Clan
Group Icon
Elite
8,711 posts

Joined: Nov 2007
From: Butterworth, PG / Machang, Kelantan



OCZ REVODRIVE PCI‐EXPRESS SSD

user posted imageuser posted image

50GB = RM759
120GB = RM1139


» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «

SOS

This post has been edited by owikh84: Jan 4 2011, 10:32 PM
pergilahsayang
post Jan 5 2011, 12:58 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
359 posts

Joined: Dec 2008
From: NoT WoRTh TelLiNg


QUOTE(owikh84 @ Jan 4 2011, 10:31 PM)
OCZ REVODRIVE PCI‐EXPRESS SSD

user posted imageuser posted image

50GB = RM759
120GB = RM1139


» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «

SOS
*
Walau this one faster than crucial Sata 3 shakehead.gif
saturn85
post Jan 5 2011, 04:56 AM

Folding@home
*******
Senior Member
8,686 posts

Joined: Mar 2009



yea, PCIe SSD is faster than sata SSD. biggrin.gif
JinXXX
post Jan 5 2011, 11:30 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,516 posts

Joined: Feb 2007
From: Uarla Umpur



QUOTE(owikh84 @ Jan 4 2011, 10:31 PM)
OCZ REVODRIVE PCI‐EXPRESS SSD

user posted imageuser posted image

50GB = RM759
120GB = RM1139
you bringing it in ?? but somehw the price isn't that competitive.. they throw out a sata controller should be cheaper right

eh wait.. is it native PCIE until the memory chips or pcie > sata raid controller > mem chips ?

QUOTE(pergilahsayang @ Jan 5 2011, 12:58 AM)
Walau this one faster than crucial Sata 3  shakehead.gif
*
sure la PCIE native.. dont have sata bottleneck


QUOTE(saturn85 @ Jan 5 2011, 04:56 AM)
yea, PCIe SSD is faster than sata SSD. biggrin.gif
*
u planning to get ? drool.gif drool.gif
stimix
post Jan 5 2011, 12:25 PM

Dunno
Group Icon
Moderator
3,542 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Puchong, Selangor



Can get 7.9 rating for this PCI?

119 Pages « < 24 25 26 27 28 > » Top
Topic ClosedOptions
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0306sec    0.42    6 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 4th December 2025 - 01:59 AM