QUOTE(0168257061 @ Dec 23 2010, 10:41 AM)
well.. intel gives 3 years warranty for its SSD, so technically it should be able to last at least 3 years to 5 yearsThe Solid State Storage Thread
The Solid State Storage Thread
|
|
Dec 23 2010, 11:01 AM
|
|
Elite
6,139 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dec 23 2010, 06:25 PM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
66 posts Joined: Dec 2010 |
|
|
|
Dec 23 2010, 09:20 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,234 posts Joined: Sep 2006 |
|
|
|
Dec 23 2010, 10:58 PM
|
|
Elite
8,711 posts Joined: Nov 2007 From: Butterworth, PG / Machang, Kelantan |
QUOTE(jinaun @ Dec 23 2010, 11:01 AM) well.. intel gives 3 years warranty for its SSD, so technically it should be able to last at least 3 years to 5 years 3 years of usage perhaps. well the lifespan is too subjective IMO.some ppl get it damaged in merely 5 years, some in less than 3 years. Like other parts nia.. no one can really expect when he's going to die or live |
|
|
Dec 24 2010, 12:40 AM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
66 posts Joined: Dec 2010 |
QUOTE(owikh84 @ Dec 23 2010, 10:58 PM) 3 years of usage perhaps. well the lifespan is too subjective IMO. wah, this really scares me. the stated mtbf is 1.2 million hours but i've heard the failure rate for a drive is 0.5% which is pretty high.some ppl get it damaged in merely 5 years, some in less than 3 years. Like other parts nia.. no one can really expect when he's going to die or live |
|
|
Dec 24 2010, 01:09 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,256 posts Joined: Aug 2007 From: Ampang TO Sibu |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dec 24 2010, 04:40 AM
|
|
VIP
8,788 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Kuala Lumpur |
QUOTE(romentheposmen @ Dec 24 2010, 12:40 AM) wah, this really scares me. the stated mtbf is 1.2 million hours but i've heard the failure rate for a drive is 0.5% which is pretty high. Don't listen to myths This post has been edited by clawhammer: Dec 24 2010, 04:53 AM |
|
|
Dec 24 2010, 04:50 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
900 posts Joined: Nov 2008 From: world of siham |
usually you all use sata2 or sata3 port for the SSD?
|
|
|
Dec 24 2010, 07:10 AM
|
|
Elite
8,711 posts Joined: Nov 2007 From: Butterworth, PG / Machang, Kelantan |
QUOTE(edmunz @ Dec 24 2010, 04:50 AM) anyone will do, I'm using SATA2 port SATA2 SSD wont get the full capability of the SATA3 port; and wont have full capability of a SATA3 SSD if the port is SATA2 Added on December 24, 2010, 7:11 am QUOTE(lingloong @ Dec 24 2010, 01:09 AM) Nothing "figurative" in PC hardware especially drive For me, all depend on luck, usage and how you take care of it This post has been edited by owikh84: Dec 24 2010, 07:11 AM |
|
|
Jan 4 2011, 11:01 AM
|
|
Moderator
3,542 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Puchong, Selangor |
Can someone share your Windows 7 experience index on your SSD?
I got got a new Mushkin (but only 40GB) got 7.7 score out of the max 7.9. Anyone got max of 7.9? |
|
|
Jan 4 2011, 11:51 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,940 posts Joined: Nov 2004 From: Soviet Sarawak |
|
|
|
Jan 4 2011, 12:18 PM
|
|
Moderator
3,542 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Puchong, Selangor |
huh? sure kah RAID HDD faster than SSD..like dat regret liao..
|
|
|
Jan 4 2011, 01:38 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,516 posts Joined: Feb 2007 From: Uarla Umpur |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jan 4 2011, 01:58 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,940 posts Joined: Nov 2004 From: Soviet Sarawak |
|
|
|
Jan 4 2011, 02:05 PM
|
|
VIP
8,788 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Kuala Lumpur |
RAID-0 SSD will give you awesome benchmark scores but in real life performance it isn't so substantial. The thing that makes the SSD fast is because of the low random access times so even if you RAID-0, the random access times remains more or less the same at +/- 0.1ms. The only advantage is the added read speed.
In short, you can feel more difference doing a 2 disks RAID-0 on Raptors than SSD's. |
|
|
Jan 4 2011, 10:31 PM
|
|
Elite
8,711 posts Joined: Nov 2007 From: Butterworth, PG / Machang, Kelantan |
OCZ REVODRIVE PCI‐EXPRESS SSD
50GB = RM759 120GB = RM1139 » Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... « SOS This post has been edited by owikh84: Jan 4 2011, 10:32 PM |
|
|
Jan 5 2011, 12:58 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
359 posts Joined: Dec 2008 From: NoT WoRTh TelLiNg |
QUOTE(owikh84 @ Jan 4 2011, 10:31 PM) OCZ REVODRIVE PCI‐EXPRESS SSD Walau this one faster than crucial Sata 3 50GB = RM759 120GB = RM1139 » Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... « SOS |
|
|
Jan 5 2011, 04:56 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
8,686 posts Joined: Mar 2009 |
yea, PCIe SSD is faster than sata SSD.
|
|
|
Jan 5 2011, 11:30 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,516 posts Joined: Feb 2007 From: Uarla Umpur |
QUOTE(owikh84 @ Jan 4 2011, 10:31 PM) OCZ REVODRIVE PCI‐EXPRESS SSD you bringing it in ?? but somehw the price isn't that competitive.. they throw out a sata controller should be cheaper right50GB = RM759 120GB = RM1139 eh wait.. is it native PCIE until the memory chips or pcie > sata raid controller > mem chips ? QUOTE(pergilahsayang @ Jan 5 2011, 12:58 AM) sure la PCIE native.. dont have sata bottleneckQUOTE(saturn85 @ Jan 5 2011, 04:56 AM) u planning to get ? |
|
|
Jan 5 2011, 12:25 PM
|
|
Moderator
3,542 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Puchong, Selangor |
Can get 7.9 rating for this PCI?
|
|
Topic ClosedOptions
|
| Change to: | 0.0306sec
0.42
6 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 4th December 2025 - 01:59 AM |