The Solid State Storage Thread

Lowyat.NET forums

Lowyat.NET Kopitiam Garage Sales

Lowyat.NET Rules and Regulations FAQ Help Search Members

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Lowyat.NET -> Hardware

Bump Topic Topic Closed RSS Feed

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

The Solid State Storage Thread

views

pergilahsayang	Sep 24 2010, 05:17 AM Return to original view \| Post #1
Casual Junior Member 359 posts Joined: Dec 2008 From: NoT WoRTh TelLiNg	If you guys have a SATAII pc and stumble upon Intel X25-M, OCZ Vertex 2 and Crucial RealSSD C300, in reliability and performance point of view, which one would you choose? (Ignoring the price)
Card PM	Report Top Like Quote Reply

pergilahsayang	Sep 24 2010, 05:39 PM Return to original view \| Post #2
Casual Junior Member 359 posts Joined: Dec 2008 From: NoT WoRTh TelLiNg	QUOTE(clawhammer @ Sep 24 2010, 02:03 PM) Who told you it's high? Any source or internal information from Intel? Sometimes when browsing the net related to SSD, i stumble upon some web discussing the issue of "SSD have higher failure rate". Though i do not dig deep into it. The only link im able to recall is: http://hothardware.com/News/SSDs-Have-High-Failure-Rate/
Card PM	Report Top Like Quote Reply

pergilahsayang	Sep 24 2010, 06:33 PM Return to original view \| Post #3
Casual Junior Member 359 posts Joined: Dec 2008 From: NoT WoRTh TelLiNg	Yeah i did say the 'only one' i can recall though
Card PM	Report Top Like Quote Reply

pergilahsayang	Oct 11 2010, 11:32 AM Return to original view \| Post #4
Casual Junior Member 359 posts Joined: Dec 2008 From: NoT WoRTh TelLiNg	Why is there so much rumors about SandFOrce chip being unreliable and have higher failure rate? but dont seem to find any factual article about this. .... in the verge of buying OCZ Vertex 2...but kinda worried
Card PM	Report Top Like Quote Reply

pergilahsayang	Jan 5 2011, 12:58 AM Return to original view \| Post #5
Casual Junior Member 359 posts Joined: Dec 2008 From: NoT WoRTh TelLiNg	QUOTE(owikh84 @ Jan 4 2011, 10:31 PM) OCZ REVODRIVE PCI‐EXPRESS SSD 50GB = RM759 120GB = RM1139 » Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... « Part Number: # 50GB - OCZSSDPX‐1RVD0050 # 120GB - OCZSSDPX‐1RVD0120 * Available in 50GB to 480GB capacities * PCI-Express interface (x4) * For use as primary boot drive or data storage * Internal RAID 0 * 181.07 (L) x 21.59 (W) x 125.08mm (H) * Shock Resistance: 1500g * Seek Time: 0.1 ms * Operating Temp: 0°C ~ +70°C * Storage Temp: -45°C ~ +85°C * Power Consumption: 3W Idle, 8W active * MTBF: 2,000,000 hours * 3-Year Warranty * Compatible with Windows XP 32/64, Vista 32/64, Windows 7 32/64 50-80GB Max Performance * Read: Up to 540 MB/s * Write: Up to 450 MB/s * Sustained Write: Up to 350 MB/s * Random Write 4KB (Aligned): 70,000 IOPS 120GB-480GB Max Performance * Read: Up to 540 MB/s * Write: Up to 480 MB/s * Sustained Write: Up to 400 MB/s * Random Write 4KB (Aligned): 75,000 IOPS SOS Walau this one faster than crucial Sata 3
Card PM	Report Top Like Quote Reply

pergilahsayang	Jan 5 2011, 05:34 PM Return to original view \| Post #6
Casual Junior Member 359 posts Joined: Dec 2008 From: NoT WoRTh TelLiNg	QUOTE(JinXXX @ Jan 5 2011, 11:30 AM) you bringing it in ?? but somehw the price isn't that competitive.. they throw out a sata controller should be cheaper right eh wait.. is it native PCIE until the memory chips or pcie > sata raid controller > mem chips ? sure la PCIE native.. dont have sata bottleneck u planning to get ? But this revodrive dont have TRIM . Performance might drop tremendously if ya torture it kaw kaw . Now, crucial Sata 3 or Revodrive for me eh?
Card PM	Report Top Like Quote Reply

« Next Oldest · Hardware · Next Newest »

Topic ClosedOptions

Change to:

0.0168sec

0.46

7 queries

GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 1st December 2025 - 11:03 PM

All Rights Reserved © 2002- 2025 Vijandren Ramadass (~unite against racism~)

Removal Request

Powered by Invision Power Board © 2025 IPS, Inc.