is the type of controller using will affect the read/write transfer rate of a SSD?
off topic:
about the title of this thread,
"Teh" SSD Thread?
This post has been edited by saturn85: Aug 6 2010, 02:03 AM
The Solid State Storage Thread
|
|
 Aug 6 2010, 01:57 AM
Return to original view | Post
#1
|
 
Senior Member
8,686 posts Joined: Mar 2009   
|
|
Quote|
|
|
|
|
Aug 17 2010, 05:14 PM
Return to original view | Post
#2
|
|
Senior Member
8,686 posts Joined: Mar 2009
|
QUOTE(TrueFalse @ Aug 15 2010, 08:39 PM) Intel SSD roadmap yea, looking forward to intel gen 3 ssd.    |
|
|
Aug 18 2010, 04:49 PM
Return to original view | Post
#3
|
|
Senior Member
8,686 posts Joined: Mar 2009
|
|
|
|
Aug 19 2010, 02:28 AM
Return to original view | Post
#4
|
|
Senior Member
8,686 posts Joined: Mar 2009
|
wonder when only the ocz colossus 1tb ssd will be affordable.
 |
|
|
Aug 20 2010, 05:17 PM
Return to original view | Post
#5
|
|
Senior Member
8,686 posts Joined: Mar 2009
|
QUOTE(skylinelover @ Aug 20 2010, 03:40 PM) when gen 3 is our 160gb should b less than 600 i guess wow, hope it is true.  then 80gb should be affordable. |
|
|
Aug 21 2010, 05:03 PM
Return to original view | Post
#6
|
|
Senior Member
8,686 posts Joined: Mar 2009
|
QUOTE(alexilalas @ Aug 21 2010, 02:10 PM) can we put SSD into water? maybe will cause some metal on the circuit board rust faster.  |
|
|
|
|
|
Aug 22 2010, 12:19 AM
Return to original view | Post
#7
|
|
Senior Member
8,686 posts Joined: Mar 2009
|
does Mean Time Between Failures (MTBF) = lifespan?
1.2 million hours is around 137 years. does it really can last that long? |
|
|
Aug 23 2010, 04:14 PM
Return to original view | Post
#8
|
|
Senior Member
8,686 posts Joined: Mar 2009
|
QUOTE(wKkaY @ Aug 23 2010, 02:41 PM) Here's another way to look at it - if you have 1000 disks and run them for 1200 hours each, the manufacturer expects one to fail. woo, i see. another definition.  looks like Mean Time Between Failures is a measurement of reliability rather than lifespan. |
|
|
Aug 24 2010, 05:15 PM
Return to original view | Post
#9
|
|
Senior Member
8,686 posts Joined: Mar 2009
|
QUOTE(everling @ Aug 24 2010, 01:51 AM) I'd buy the cheapest ringgt/GB SSD with a good controller. Kingston's SSDNow V Series 128 GB comes to mind. Intel's are also another good set of SSDs. The greater performance from SandForce's controllers isn't that great once you have any decent SSD and OCZ SSDs has a huge price premium. hey, how much is the ssd you mentioned? |
|
|
Aug 25 2010, 12:47 AM
Return to original view | Post
#10
|
|
Senior Member
8,686 posts Joined: Mar 2009
|
wow, thanks for all the information.
|
|
|
Aug 25 2010, 01:58 PM
Return to original view | Post
#11
|
|
Senior Member
8,686 posts Joined: Mar 2009
|
haha, just to minimize the loading time.
 |
|
|
Aug 28 2010, 11:59 PM
Return to original view | Post
#12
|
|
Senior Member
8,686 posts Joined: Mar 2009
|
QUOTE(teknokrasi @ Aug 28 2010, 11:05 PM) SSD sounds tempting, but high price tag makes ppl shy away yea, just can say the time haven't come yet.  |
|
|
Aug 29 2010, 03:01 AM
Return to original view | Post
#13
|
|
Senior Member
8,686 posts Joined: Mar 2009
|
QUOTE(teknokrasi @ Aug 29 2010, 02:34 AM) Btw,.. with ssd, we can say good bye to sector like magnetic hdd.. yea, ssd really is a good invention.more reliable, and data are more secure. |
|
|
|
|
|
Aug 29 2010, 04:11 PM
Return to original view | Post
#14
|
|
Senior Member
8,686 posts Joined: Mar 2009
|
i think can wait and see how is the intel gen 3 ssd perform and price first.
 |
|
|
Oct 6 2010, 06:09 AM
Return to original view | Post
#15
|
|
Senior Member
8,686 posts Joined: Mar 2009
|
this is the things everyone waiting for.
 |
|
|
Oct 8 2010, 03:11 AM
Return to original view | Post
#16
|
|
Senior Member
8,686 posts Joined: Mar 2009
|
the later results looks like abit slow in transfer rate.
|
|
|
Oct 8 2010, 03:35 AM
Return to original view | Post
#17
|
|
Senior Member
8,686 posts Joined: Mar 2009
|
QUOTE(everling @ Oct 8 2010, 03:25 AM) You mean the results for my first SSD after 5 months of wear and tear? That is normal for any SSD after they have been "used". But their performance probably will remain stable after that because of TRIM. wow, never expect that the ssd degrade so fast. Older SSDs without TRIM support will continue to degrade in performance until they perform worse than HDDs. This is the reason why the older version of the Kingston SSDNow V Series 128GB should be boycotted, as it did not have TRIM support. Also, OSes without TRIM support (eg: Windows XP) should not be used with SSDs that do not have internal TRIM support, which the newer Kingston has. merely a 5 months usage, already drop to near hdd performance. |
|
|
Oct 8 2010, 08:57 PM
Return to original view | Post
#18
|
|
Senior Member
8,686 posts Joined: Mar 2009
|
oops, sorry. i mean this result:
QUOTE(everling @ Oct 8 2010, 12:09 AM) The new Kingston SSD of the same model bought this week. Installed Windows 7 on it. the transfer rate looks like abit slow.   |
|
|
Oct 9 2010, 04:14 AM
Return to original view | Post
#19
|
|
Senior Member
8,686 posts Joined: Mar 2009
|
looks like didn't have much improve on transfer rate.
|
|
|
Oct 18 2010, 12:41 AM
Return to original view | Post
#20
|
|
Senior Member
8,686 posts Joined: Mar 2009
|
QUOTE(CHIP CN @ Oct 17 2010, 11:16 AM) hdd manufacturer x der buat ssd ker??? ke x hebat?? WD have WD SiliconEdge Blue SSD. This post has been edited by saturn85: Oct 18 2010, 12:42 AM |
|
Topic ClosedOptions
|
| Change to: |  0.0445sec
 0.36
 7 queries
 GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 29th November 2025 - 07:07 PM |
All Rights Reserved © 2002- 2025 Vijandren Ramadass (~unite against racism~)
Powered by Invision Power Board © 2025 IPS, Inc.