QUOTE(jucl @ Jun 23 2013, 03:58 PM)
In ur opinion, which masterplan to you think is better? Metropark or Icon. Location wise icon is better but metropark is freehold.
Guess we shud compare the icon with tropicana gardens and definely now icon become value for money. Only thing is tropicana garden have mrt but does additional 300-400psf justify the premium for mrt? Hmmm
As an armchair commentator, plan for plan, imho metropark may b better as they have hospital, twonhouses and education institution. Others are pretty similar... Residence, hotel, soho, retail and offices. Although both have not reveal much other than the sold or selling phases.
But I think 12_15 years is too far away. The world will change. Needs and demand will change. For better or worst I rather go with a plan I can touch and feel sooner than later.
As for Garden, I don't know enuf of its masterplan. Gardens has star value in MrT though. Many may see it as more than sufficient to strike out icon city. But icon city has better road connection and it is closer to other major towns and city. And look at Singapore... Despite its super efficient public transport, every singaporean dream to have CAR as one of their 5Cs of life. Car will get cheaper as we go along judging by govment election pledge. Also Business travellers don't take mrt to meetings anyway.
As for freehold, I love them but they are really overrated. Nonetheless I seek freehold whenever possible. But I should take in evrything else in consideration.
My 1cents opinion la. Feel free to correct me and put me in the right place hehehe.