I'm sick of TM reading what I post here and making changes without even giving any acknowledgment.

What sort of changes? Changes that improves the service or changes that block the use of what you discover and share here?

What sort of changes? Changes that improves the service or changes that block the use of what you discover and share here?

Hmm. I guess it might be safer if I connect the Link sys to the Dlink in bridge mode for now, disable DHCP and let the DHCP come from the Dlink?
I have preset static IPs in Tomato for QOS - I guess I have to change these now?

Gah this is ridiculous, TM called to say they can't find my house in their system. /facepalm.jpg

Changes that have 0 effect on the quality of their service but discourage power users from straying away from using their crap hardware.. therefore putting those users at a disadvantage.

y unifi don make a guide or giving information to public that wish to use their own hardware? DIR615 is more than enough for many users but still some users who own a better router than DIR615, y unifi wanna "force" us to use their dlink? what is their purpose? im not understand

But, more significantly, the 615 could reliably sustain only 32 connections in the maximum simultaneous connections test. Ubicom questioned these results when they first posted in the charts and said its tests (also done with IxChariot) produced results more like the 625's. D-Link had no comment on the results.

With all due respect to the writer of this review, I feel I must disagree with their assessment of this router.

While cheap, in use this router reveals exactly why it does not cost much: the hardware is extremely weak, only supporting 32 simultaneous connections, with many other N routers supporting in excess of 200. This means that this router is extremely weak with regards to peer-to-peer technologies such as BitTorrent.

I have also found this router will crash if you keep it at that 32 connection limit for long enough.

It may be fine if you have a smaller connection (I have 50Mbit) or don't use peer-to-peer technology, but otherwise I would recommend getting a better router.

Changes that have 0 effect on the quality of their service but discourage power users from straying away from using their crap hardware.. therefore putting those users at a disadvantage.
That's not really bridge mode, its just using the Linksys as a wireless AP/switch. The routing is still performed by the Dlink using TM's DIR-615 firmware and is limited by it. I only recommend this if you're happy with the DIR-615 routing performance (no lockups, a lot of connections per second, etc.) but you're dissatisfied with the wireless access point performance (weak signal). Proper bridge mode involves a direct connection between Fiberhome <--> Linksys with the DIR-615 back in its own box.

Tomato? Are you on Tomato or dd-wrt?

there should be special page for unifi subscibers guide to ,odify the routers.

dear all,

any unifi users here? I just got the unifi installed in my house here is sect 9 shah alam. VIP 5

I felt that it is faster than streamyx abit only.....I dont felt like really 5mbps.

anyone mind to share? i m planning to upgrade to VIP 10. got differences ma?
thx

Help! My Internet still does not work!

A problem for which there is no single common fix. Understanding some basics about networking, subnets, NAT, etc. would be in your best interest to troubleshoot this issue. You may need to call your Internet Service Provider (ISP) for settings that are particular to your connection. Some ISPs not using PPPoE expect the MAC address (hardware address) of to router to match that of your computer, especially when you used your computer without the router to setup everything initially. You may need to use the "Clone MAC Address" feature. If using PPPoE, make sure you use the correct username and password. For cable and satellite users, generally DHCP is the correct setting. For Comcast Cable users, be sure to disable STP. For users trying to share a dial-up connection, you'll need to read the Wiki article Sharing Dialup. At any rate, it's a near 99% chance that the problem is not your DD-WRT firmware, but instead a lack of understanding with networking.