Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Bump Topic Topic Closed RSS Feed
111 Pages « < 23 24 25 26 27 > » Bottom

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

Unifi Official TM UniFi High Speed Broadbrand Thread V4, Latest:NO cap 4 unifi packages 4 now ^_^

views
     
sg999
post Mar 26 2010, 09:53 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,027 posts

Joined: May 2008
QUOTE(boxsystem @ Mar 26 2010, 10:52 PM)
QFT!  laugh.gif
baik beli server sendiri pastu download sampai mati. hahaha.
*
tak payah r
streamyx 4m sudah boleh 1TB/month rclxms.gif
powerfulcool
post Mar 26 2010, 09:55 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
179 posts

Joined: Dec 2009
so macam mana ni? got limit or not. this thread starter said dont have, but this website still states the existence of the cap: http://www.unifi.my/unifi/index.php?option...d=76&Itemid=206
pziv2
post Mar 26 2010, 09:56 PM

On my way
****
Senior Member
551 posts

Joined: Nov 2009
Only way to find out validity is to subscribe. Or not.
whatsayyou
post Mar 26 2010, 09:57 PM

On my way
****
Senior Member
525 posts

Joined: Mar 2010
QUOTE(powerfulcool @ Mar 26 2010, 09:55 PM)
so macam mana ni? got limit or not. this thread starter said dont have, but this website still states the existence of the cap: http://www.unifi.my/unifi/index.php?option...d=76&Itemid=206
*
bloody hell, can u read the twitter post and do some thinking?
mylinear
post Mar 26 2010, 10:03 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
974 posts

Joined: Jan 2009
I had already posted yesterday that I was told that there was no cap until end of this year. It seems like they decided to announce this today and say it is based on user feedback. I really think they had already decided not to have a cap till end of the year anyway, but they had to put in the cap in the advertisements to prevent future complaints from users when a cap is introduced.

It is clear that they are temporarily not implementing the cap for now, most likely till end of this year. It does not mean that there will be no cap at all forever. It probably means that they will resume the cap next year or before that if the situation needs it to be done.

I think the initial cap was put in the packages so that users would already know from the start that there is (or will be) a cap. That is better than suddenly introducing it a few months later.

Also since there are only 4 areas where Unifi is currently available, not having a cap currently should not affect overall performance for new customers. When more areas come on-board in Q3 and Q4, then that will be the time to see if overall performance can be good or not with the increasing number of customers. That is why they have said there would be no cap till end of the year.

What they will probably do now is to monitor users usage over the next few months to see what sort of cap wil be suitable. It will either be more than 60/90/120GB or else they know users will start complaining again then. I do not think they will decide to not have a cap at all later on. In fact, if they have learnt anything from Streamyx operations, they would be smart to most definitely have a cap, which they have done with their initial introduction of the Unifi packages.


powerfulcool
post Mar 26 2010, 10:04 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
179 posts

Joined: Dec 2009
QUOTE(whatsayyou @ Mar 26 2010, 09:57 PM)
bloody hell, can u read the twitter post and do some thinking?
*
ah shove it up your behind. the website should be the main source of information, the rest are secondary from which i havent had the chance to look at. you're a typical 3rd-world malaysian, dont you have some respect for others?
dopp
post Mar 26 2010, 10:07 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,733 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Penang



Yea.. website should be main source... But why u come forum and ask..As if Tmnet VP here to answer your question.

QUOTE(powerfulcool @ Mar 26 2010, 10:04 PM)
ah shove it up your behind. the website should be the main source of information, the rest are secondary from which i havent had the chance to look at. you're a typical 3rd-world malaysian, dont you have some respect for others?
*
mylinear
post Mar 26 2010, 10:07 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
974 posts

Joined: Jan 2009
QUOTE(powerfulcool @ Mar 26 2010, 10:04 PM)
ah shove it up your behind. the website should be the main source of information, the rest are secondary from which i havent had the chance to look at. you're a typical 3rd-world malaysian, dont you have some respect for others?
*
The website has probably not been updated. The 7pm radio news today mentioned TM is temporarily suspending the cap for now. Please check previous posts in the past couple of pages, there was a link to a Star article that mentions it too.

antwar
post Mar 26 2010, 10:09 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
102 posts

Joined: Jul 2008
QUOTE(mylinear @ Mar 26 2010, 10:07 PM)
The website has probably not been updated. The 7pm radio news today mentioned TM is temporarily suspending the cap for now. Please check previous posts in the past couple of pages, there was a link to a Star article that mentions it too.
*

or u can check it here
http://star-techcentral.com/tech/story.asp...&sec=technology


googelizer
post Mar 26 2010, 10:09 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
21 posts

Joined: Nov 2006
hrm... 5 mbps is pretty quick... but the crappy channels....


Added on March 26, 2010, 10:10 pmif theres AXN, DISC., AFC and HISTORY, IM ALL FOR THE 20 MBPS ...

This post has been edited by googelizer: Mar 26 2010, 10:10 PM
gohkokho
post Mar 26 2010, 10:10 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
364 posts

Joined: Nov 2008
IMO, there should be a cap to prevent bandwidth hogger. Just that it need to be revised to higher capacity to accommodate HD contents online.

Look at the quality of Screamyx line when there is no cap. I have some friends downloading/torrenting non stop 24/7 and the only time their PC is off is when there is a power failure.

For now, TM said no cap "FOR NOW", important key word and the purpose is to put out the fire of people disgruntled about it during launching and hopefully more people will sign up.

So you want no cap with sucks HSBB line or sufficient cap with fast reliable HSBB line?

Think about it before ranting and complaining.
powerfulcool
post Mar 26 2010, 10:11 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
179 posts

Joined: Dec 2009
thanks guys. i came here to ask about it... too many pages to brose through to find out the secondary source
BlueWind
post Mar 26 2010, 10:11 PM

Sianzation
*******
Senior Member
2,901 posts

Joined: Jan 2007



Channels are the least of worries now as they will more added later on. What most of us want now is TM to be more generous on the capping limit.
pengiranijam
post Mar 26 2010, 10:12 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,568 posts

Joined: Dec 2004
From: Malaysia Truly Asia



QUOTE(ahpek26 @ Mar 26 2010, 08:49 PM)
read "suspending". kids these days so gullible, its cute smile.gif
*
QUOTE(liquidsny @ Mar 26 2010, 08:49 PM)
suspended.. not remove and they already plan not capping this year before this riot of us
*
Well, new business just up. Need to promo, is standard la.

QUOTE(sg999 @ Mar 26 2010, 08:50 PM)
so the 60gb mean???
*
No capping until further notice... brows.gif

googelizer
post Mar 26 2010, 10:13 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
21 posts

Joined: Nov 2006
once the cap starts ... its gonna get worse... bandwidth will decrease and price will go up... im sure that'll happen knowing malaysian companies
mylinear
post Mar 26 2010, 10:14 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
974 posts

Joined: Jan 2009
QUOTE(antwar @ Mar 26 2010, 10:09 PM)
Thank you antwar . That was the link I was referring to.

dopp
post Mar 26 2010, 10:14 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,733 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Penang



I'm okay if after quota, speed cap to 10% of original speed. At least better than 128k for some wireless bb
powerfulcool
post Mar 26 2010, 10:15 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
179 posts

Joined: Dec 2009
QUOTE(BlueWind @ Mar 26 2010, 10:11 PM)
Channels are the least of worries now as they will more added later on. What most of us want now is TM to be more generous on the capping limit.
*
aside from the internet service, the mini Astro and free phone service is a big sell for me. im thinking of stopping astro service after the world cup.

will TM or other terrestrial channels broadcast the world cup?
googelizer
post Mar 26 2010, 10:15 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
21 posts

Joined: Nov 2006
especially when the're the monopoly here... do some thinking about it .... in places like au it should be fine cause there are lotsa other companies which creates competition in the industry... what do we have here ? crappy digi celcom maxis.. 3g broadband... they cant compete in such field to begin with anyway...

SUSigothack
post Mar 26 2010, 10:16 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
5 posts

Joined: Oct 2009
add star world and hbo to IPTV and I'll be set

111 Pages « < 23 24 25 26 27 > » Top
Topic ClosedOptions
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0424sec    0.83    7 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 3rd December 2025 - 03:07 PM