QUOTE(DigitalTech @ Aug 19 2010, 07:01 PM)
Wow, you are predicting the outcome already. So no need to test la?
Anyway, if the outcome is no difference, then you guys have proof SimplayHD, THX, HDMI.org wrong.
You can appoint a lawyer to sue their claims and maybe make million of dollars out of it.
See, this shows you don't fully understand what you're selling. SimplayHD, THX, HDMI.org talk about technical standards. Most of which relate to bandwidth and length. They talk about quantitative measures, not qualitative ones.
So tell me, what is the relationship of bandwidth to image quality? Assuming two different cables with the same bandwidth capacity, how will that impact image quality?
QUOTE
If the outcome is got difference, they you guys please go out there and buy branded quality cables immediately.
Definitely! If the outcome is that premium cables got positive difference I would be quite keen to buy it. I'm serious.
QUOTE
Seriously, either outcome arise, you guys won't do any of my suggestions.
You all just want to proof that cheap cable are equally good as expensive cable.
No matter what is the outcome, you guys will not buy branded cables anyway. It's just your personal selection and feelings.
This is where you're wrong. We're here to learn also. Don't you want to prove that expensive cable is better than cheap cable? If we are proven wrong then we also learn something new.
For example, in the past I didn't believe in branded power cords. I thought the standard one is good enough and there was no difference with the expensive cords. Then I borrowed some branded power cords and did some listening tests. Ok there was some difference so I bought the branded power cords.
Added on August 19, 2010, 9:01 pmQUOTE(netmatrix2 @ Aug 19 2010, 04:11 PM)
Hi i was just browsing by and come across you guys saying about bandwidth. From what i know bandwidth between devices is controlled by hardware. Not cables. If you are talking about bandwidths then i assume binary data 1 and 0. If the source can send 1000 kbps from source, of course the receiver should be able to cope with 1000 kbps. But i'm comparing CAT 5 LAN cables. The only time there would be bottleneck is if you have too many receiving units.
Now if digital signals sent from player to TV is just straight there. There should not be bandwidth problem. Unless the TV uses old or slow hardware to decipher to video/sound data.
In CAT 5 LAN cables, line quality is affected with length starting from 100M above. But HDMI cables are so short. Hardly more than 3 Metre.
My logic is purely on hardware and not much from cables. I was wondering why u guys talk about bandwidth? I do not think there is any relation of the cables to bandwidth of TV and player hardware.
You're right, bandwidth is related to hardware and the media format involved. How it relates to cables is that the cable must be able to carry the bandwidth between the hardware.
Like if you have gigabit hardware on both ends, you need a gigabit LAN cable for the hardware work to full capacity. If you use a cable only suitable for 100BASE-T then there will be limitations.
This post has been edited by jchong: Aug 19 2010, 10:23 PM