Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

44 Pages « < 27 28 29 30 31 > » Bottom

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 HDMI Cable Quality?, Really make a diffrent?

views
     
pierreye
post Aug 19 2010, 10:03 AM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,308 posts

Joined: Oct 2004
From: Penang & Ipoh


Do a ABX blind test. I had done that I can tell you most likely after few rounds, everyone kind of give up and just enjoy the music and movie. The only thing that can really be differentiate is when we burn a original audiophile CD to CD-R. The burn copy does sound a bit different especially the vocal.

This post has been edited by pierreye: Aug 19 2010, 10:08 AM
DigitalTech
post Aug 19 2010, 10:08 AM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
974 posts

Joined: Aug 2005
From: Petaling Jaya



QUOTE(mys_terious @ Aug 19 2010, 09:10 AM)
bro if we do the test without him there will be dispute abt how the test was done, the equipment used bla bla bla..  i also wanna see the true potential squeezed out by monster cables that kenot be done by a 6' monoprice...  it is better for him to be there .. so he can shut us up once and for all, increases his sales too .. by the way is he on holiday or something.. maybe we should file a police report abt this missing person .. helOOOooooOoooo where r u  hmm.gif
*
Someone calling? No need to file police report. I'm here. wink.gif

Anyway, I can loan you guys some monster cables, like HDMI, component, svideo.

No matter what kind of test you guys have, there will not be an ultimate decision, as it will still arguments on many things like equipment used, lightings, tv panel used, ear canals too much wax, eyes very tired, etc.

You will not get everybody to agree on 1 thing. Some see it, some don't.

I'm not going to continue this debate, as everybody is born different with different points and views.

I just highlighted and share my point of view about Monster cables, as many of customers gave very good remarks and stay loyal to it.

With or without me, go ahead and do the test and we'll see the results.

This post has been edited by DigitalTech: Aug 19 2010, 02:58 PM
mys_terious
post Aug 19 2010, 10:14 AM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
882 posts

Joined: Jul 2007
QUOTE(htkaki @ Aug 19 2010, 09:48 AM)
I can always let you guys have the properly calibrated and set up room. Although it is not a high-end system, IMHO this mid-range system should be good enough to test it out as it is able to 'detect' any flaws in a BD recording.

Equipments :

1. Denon AVR-4310
2. Panasonic DMP-BD60
3. Dune Prime 3.0
4. Optoma HD65
5. Samsung 40B550
6. SVS 7150 7channel power amp
7. Onkyo NR1008
8. SVS M series loudspeakers : MBS-01 as front wide
9. SVS SCS-01(M) : Surround
10. Belden 1311A for surr and front wide
11. XLO HT6 speaker cable for front
12. Kimber 8PR for center
13. Power amp connected with Kimber Kable Hero, Timbre & PBJ
14. Subwoofers : SVS PB13-Ultra, SB13-Plus, PB12-Plus, SB12-NSD
15. Sub EQ : AS-EQ1

Speaking of which mostly award winning stuffs in a well controlled room.

Done Audyssey calibration and also SPL meter level checked for each channel.

I am very interested to find out more. I'll call the rest of audiophiles and HT gang.

We shall do in this way.

I'll connect the cable w/o telling what cable is being used (everyone have to wait outside). Then, all go in and audition.

Then, change to another cable, same process. We shall do this a few times and we shall see the end result.

Agree?
*
i think your place should be perfect! .. but now we need to find the missing person.. i am getting worried abt him now
faidzal1982
post Aug 19 2010, 02:03 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
272 posts

Joined: Nov 2006
From: Bangi, Puchong


QUOTE(mys_terious @ Aug 19 2010, 10:14 AM)
i think your place should be perfect! .. but now we need to find the missing person.. i am getting worried abt him now
*
bro... he posted 6 minutes before u... seems he not missing la... tongue.gif
mys_terious
post Aug 19 2010, 03:55 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
882 posts

Joined: Jul 2007
QUOTE(faidzal1982 @ Aug 19 2010, 02:03 PM)
bro... he posted 6 minutes before u... seems he not missing la...  tongue.gif
*
haha glad he is ok .. but he didnt answer the questions i asked.. and he is also not interested in our test:P i do trust pierreye's view and test... just thought digitaltech will prove us wrong since he kept saying the opposite .. avoiding the abx test makesme have alot of doubt abt the things he claims now..

jchong
post Aug 19 2010, 04:02 PM

****************
*******
Senior Member
5,989 posts

Joined: Nov 2005
QUOTE(DigitalTech @ Aug 19 2010, 10:08 AM)
No matter what kind of test you guys have, there will not be an ultimate decision, as it will still arguments on many things like equipment used, lightings, tv panel used, ear canals too much wax, eyes very tired, etc.

You will not get everybody to agree on 1 thing. Some see it, some don't.
*
Those are just your excuses. Secretly you're afraid of the outcome. Because if you're there and you can't also tell the difference then your whole case and credibility goes down the drain.
netmatrix2
post Aug 19 2010, 04:11 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
481 posts

Joined: Jun 2010
Hi i was just browsing by and come across you guys saying about bandwidth. From what i know bandwidth between devices is controlled by hardware. Not cables. If you are talking about bandwidths then i assume binary data 1 and 0. If the source can send 1000 kbps from source, of course the receiver should be able to cope with 1000 kbps. But i'm comparing CAT 5 LAN cables. The only time there would be bottleneck is if you have too many receiving units.

Now if digital signals sent from player to TV is just straight there. There should not be bandwidth problem. Unless the TV uses old or slow hardware to decipher to video/sound data.

In CAT 5 LAN cables, line quality is affected with length starting from 100M above. But HDMI cables are so short. Hardly more than 3 Metre.

My logic is purely on hardware and not much from cables. I was wondering why u guys talk about bandwidth? I do not think there is any relation of the cables to bandwidth of TV and player hardware.
ADJ
post Aug 19 2010, 04:27 PM

..::fairlight::..
*******
Senior Member
2,921 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Ipoh/PJ/KL




QUOTE(DigitalTech @ Aug 19 2010, 10:08 AM)
No matter what kind of test you guys have, there will not be an ultimate decision, as it will still arguments on many things like equipment used, lightings, tv panel used, ear canals too much wax, eyes very tired, etc.

You will not get everybody to agree on 1 thing. Some see it, some don't.
*
If there are so many caveats to the to how much difference a person can see between the cables, then it is even more a reason why we don't need to waste our hard earned RM on overpriced cables.

simply put, if i was to pay such amounts for expensive HDMI cables, i should be able to see/hear the differences even if my ear canals are full of wax or my eyes are tired. afterall, thats why i pay more right?

but to chicken out with so many "disclaimers" and "assumptions" about what people may say, that shows a clear lack of confidence in your own products. So from making bold statements like "unjustifiable to use cheapo cables with PS3", now we get meek excuses like "lighting, tv panels, etc etc".

as far as i know, tests definitely have more than one person, with various opinions. thats why reviews often quote the various opinions from the attendees, and then allow the reader to make their own conclusions.

maybe DigitalTech should ask the product development team in Monster to start making Monster performance SATA cables, IDE cables, USB cables, DVI cables, Telephone cables etc. That would be fitting of a reputable cable company. doh.gif
chewkl
post Aug 19 2010, 05:03 PM

Peasant
Group Icon
Elite
2,170 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
IMHO, for digital cables, if the source throws out 1010 and U get 1010 at the receiving end, that's all that matters. RM10 or RM1000 cables.
mys_terious
post Aug 19 2010, 05:39 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
882 posts

Joined: Jul 2007
QUOTE(ADJ @ Aug 19 2010, 04:27 PM)
If there are so many caveats to the to how much difference a person can see between the cables, then it is even more a reason why we don't need to waste our hard earned RM on overpriced cables.

simply put, if i was to pay such amounts for expensive HDMI cables, i should be able to see/hear the differences even if my ear canals are full of wax or my eyes are tired. afterall, thats why i pay more right?

but to chicken out with so many "disclaimers" and "assumptions" about what people may say, that shows a clear lack of confidence in your own products. So from making bold statements like "unjustifiable to use cheapo cables with PS3", now we get meek excuses like "lighting, tv panels, etc etc".

as far as i know, tests definitely have more than one person, with various opinions. thats why reviews often quote the various opinions from the attendees, and then allow the reader to make their own conclusions.

maybe DigitalTech should ask the product development team in Monster to start making Monster performance SATA cables, IDE cables, USB cables, DVI cables, Telephone cables etc. That would be fitting of a reputable cable company.  doh.gif
*
honestly i dont care abt how much they sell the cables.. it is their right.. but pls dont mislead buyers of what monoprice hdmi cant do and what miracles monster can do.. buying monster cable doesnt mean we are stupid or wasting money.. it might really last longer or more tahan lasak.. i have bought expensive wallets too.. but lets not mislead ppl that the rm50 note kept in a Gucci wallet can buy me more nasi lemak than a rm50 note kept in a Kikilala wallet
faidzal1982
post Aug 19 2010, 05:56 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
272 posts

Joined: Nov 2006
From: Bangi, Puchong


QUOTE(mys_terious @ Aug 19 2010, 05:39 PM)
honestly i dont care abt how much they sell the cables.. it is their right..  but pls dont mislead buyers of what monoprice hdmi cant do and what miracles monster can do..  buying monster cable doesnt mean we are stupid or wasting money.. it might really last longer or more tahan lasak.. i have bought expensive wallets too.. but lets not mislead ppl that the rm50 note kept in a Gucci wallet can buy me more nasi lemak than a rm50 note kept in a Kikilala wallet
*
i like your comparison bro.. biggrin.gif havent heard kikilala brand for a while... smile.gif
DigitalTech
post Aug 19 2010, 07:01 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
974 posts

Joined: Aug 2005
From: Petaling Jaya



QUOTE(jchong @ Aug 19 2010, 04:02 PM)
Those are just your excuses. Secretly you're afraid of the outcome. Because if you're there and you can't also tell the difference then your whole case and credibility goes down the drain.
*
Wow, you are predicting the outcome already. So no need to test la?

Anyway, if the outcome is no difference, then you guys have proof SimplayHD, THX, HDMI.org wrong.
You can appoint a lawyer to sue their claims and maybe make million of dollars out of it.

If the outcome is got difference, they you guys please go out there and buy branded quality cables immediately.

Seriously, either outcome arise, you guys won't do any of my suggestions.

You all just want to proof that cheap cable are equally good as expensive cable.
No matter what is the outcome, you guys will not buy branded cables anyway. It's just your personal selection and feelings.

If I'm afraid of the outcome, I will not offer my Monster cables for the testing.

You guys can still sabo me kaw kaw here if I'm wrong, right?
DigitalTech
post Aug 19 2010, 07:02 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
974 posts

Joined: Aug 2005
From: Petaling Jaya



QUOTE(chewkl @ Aug 19 2010, 05:03 PM)
IMHO, for digital cables, if the source throws out 1010 and U get 1010 at the receiving end, that's all that matters. RM10 or RM1000 cables.
*
Here we go again.......
Synco
post Aug 19 2010, 07:08 PM

CCB
****
Senior Member
667 posts

Joined: Jan 2007


QUOTE(DigitalTech @ Aug 19 2010, 07:01 PM)
Wow, you are predicting the outcome already. So no need to test la?

Anyway, if the outcome is no difference, then you guys have proof SimplayHD, THX, HDMI.org wrong.
You can appoint a lawyer to sue their claims and maybe make million of dollars out of it.

If the outcome is got difference, they you guys please go out there and buy branded quality cables immediately.

Seriously, either outcome arise, you guys won't do any of my suggestions.

You all just want to proof that cheap cable are equally good as expensive cable.
No matter what is the outcome, you guys will not buy branded cables anyway. It's just your personal selection and feelings.

If I'm afraid of the outcome, I will not offer my Monster cables for the testing.

You guys can still sabo me kaw kaw here if I'm wrong, right?
*
i am quite sure if the outcome shows branded hdmi improves performance , most ppl here will buy it .
we r here to share knowledge not to bash seller anyway.

neb
post Aug 19 2010, 07:22 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,234 posts

Joined: Feb 2007
monster cables are actually pretty good unsure.gif , read how gizmodo tested a few HDMI cable using professional tools
http://gizmodo.com/268788/the-truth-about-...-keep-upusually

azbro
post Aug 19 2010, 07:52 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
4,403 posts

Joined: Jan 2007
From: Johor Bahru


I guess everyone has set their minds no matter what is the outcome...if its true there are difference...I'm sure its small only...but that wont make me buy a Monster Cable..90% of us wont......even if there are no difference, Monster owners beg to differ..

Verdict: Everyone wins

This post has been edited by azbro: Aug 19 2010, 07:53 PM
jchong
post Aug 19 2010, 08:52 PM

****************
*******
Senior Member
5,989 posts

Joined: Nov 2005
QUOTE(DigitalTech @ Aug 19 2010, 07:01 PM)
Wow, you are predicting the outcome already. So no need to test la?

Anyway, if the outcome is no difference, then you guys have proof SimplayHD, THX, HDMI.org wrong.
You can appoint a lawyer to sue their claims and maybe make million of dollars out of it.


See, this shows you don't fully understand what you're selling. SimplayHD, THX, HDMI.org talk about technical standards. Most of which relate to bandwidth and length. They talk about quantitative measures, not qualitative ones.

So tell me, what is the relationship of bandwidth to image quality? Assuming two different cables with the same bandwidth capacity, how will that impact image quality?

QUOTE
If the outcome is got difference, they you guys please go out there and buy branded quality cables immediately.


Definitely! If the outcome is that premium cables got positive difference I would be quite keen to buy it. I'm serious.

QUOTE
Seriously, either outcome arise, you guys won't do any of my suggestions.

You all just want to proof that cheap cable are equally good as expensive cable.
No matter what is the outcome, you guys will not buy branded cables anyway. It's just your personal selection and feelings.
*
This is where you're wrong. We're here to learn also. Don't you want to prove that expensive cable is better than cheap cable? If we are proven wrong then we also learn something new.

For example, in the past I didn't believe in branded power cords. I thought the standard one is good enough and there was no difference with the expensive cords. Then I borrowed some branded power cords and did some listening tests. Ok there was some difference so I bought the branded power cords.


Added on August 19, 2010, 9:01 pm
QUOTE(netmatrix2 @ Aug 19 2010, 04:11 PM)
Hi i was just browsing by and come across you guys saying about bandwidth. From what i know bandwidth between devices is controlled by hardware. Not cables. If you are talking about bandwidths then i assume binary data 1 and 0. If the source can send 1000 kbps from source, of course the receiver should be able to cope with 1000 kbps. But i'm comparing CAT 5 LAN cables. The only time there would be bottleneck is if you have too many receiving units.

Now if digital signals sent from player to TV is just straight there. There should not be bandwidth problem. Unless the TV uses old or slow hardware to decipher to video/sound data.

In CAT 5 LAN cables, line quality is affected with length starting from 100M above. But HDMI cables are so short. Hardly more than 3 Metre.

My logic is purely on hardware and not much from cables. I was wondering why u guys talk about bandwidth? I do not think there is any relation of the cables to bandwidth of TV and player hardware.
*
You're right, bandwidth is related to hardware and the media format involved. How it relates to cables is that the cable must be able to carry the bandwidth between the hardware.

Like if you have gigabit hardware on both ends, you need a gigabit LAN cable for the hardware work to full capacity. If you use a cable only suitable for 100BASE-T then there will be limitations.

This post has been edited by jchong: Aug 19 2010, 10:23 PM
mys_terious
post Aug 19 2010, 09:06 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
882 posts

Joined: Jul 2007
Am i wrong?

'not all hdmi cable are the same' .. the articles only say some can carry 1080p for a longer distance some cant.. but for those that pass the test lets say real world 8-bit 60Hz 1080p at certain length , both cable A and B will yield the same result right?
neb
post Aug 19 2010, 09:12 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,234 posts

Joined: Feb 2007
QUOTE(jchong @ Aug 19 2010, 08:52 PM)
Like if you have gigabit hardware on both ends, you need a gigabit LAN cable for the hardware work to full capacity. If you use a cable only suitable for 100BASE-T then there will be limitations.
*
regarding your networking cable analogy, for gigabit network, networking cable with cat 5e or cat 6 must be used, cable with cat 5 certified spec is not suitable because cat 5 cable does not have enough number of twist in the wire pair

see how the construction of cable can affect data transfer speed

This post has been edited by neb: Aug 19 2010, 09:13 PM
htkaki
post Aug 19 2010, 09:29 PM

Maxx Audio Visual
********
Senior Member
14,193 posts

Joined: May 2005
From: Sbn / KL



QUOTE(terranova @ Aug 19 2010, 09:59 AM)
If I may add my 2 cents. With no disrespect to htkaki, you will need an impartial observer to witness and verify that cable #1 is brand X and cable #2 is brand Y. Also, a vote count sheet.

Waaa ... this one turning out like a general election leh! tongue.gif  Damn I wish I could be there.
*
Bro, no problemo. I am just curious to know what is the result. Better still, I shall ask my staff to do the switching of cables w/o telling me which one. I'll join the rest outside. This way, I can be a participant too blush.gif


QUOTE
Anyway, I can loan you guys some monster cables, like HDMI, component, svideo.

Only interested in HDMI coz HD is the 'in' thing now tongue.gif Boss, when can I get it? smile.gif

44 Pages « < 27 28 29 30 31 > » Top
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0282sec    0.38    6 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 16th December 2025 - 07:09 PM