Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

Business The Truth about Actuarial Science, It is not only about the Math

views
     
TSmonkeyseemonkeydo
post May 23 2009, 07:04 AM, updated 17y ago

New Member
*
Junior Member
6 posts

Joined: May 2009
I believe that people are doing Actuarial Science for the wrong reasons. I hope that this post will actually shatter the disillusionment that people have. Don’t get me wrong, I am not trying to discourage people to pursue this challenging course, its challenge being its ultimate reward. However, it is disheartening to see so many people get into this course and ending up not being qualified actuaries, because they fail to understand what this course is all about.
First and foremost, my qualifications: I have wanted to do Actuarial Science since I was in Form 4. In college, I did my research and I have looked at the qualifications provided in the UK, US, Australia and Malaysia. I have now finished my final year in Actuarial Science in the UK. I have interned in an insurance company in Malaysia as well as in my current location. And I have been in your shoes before.

To get the ball rolling, here are some misconceptions that need to be cleared up:

1. I want to do Actuarial Science because I like Math.
This is the biggest misconception that people have about Actuarial Science. In actual fact, a good knowledge of Mathematics is necessary, but a great knowledge is not. In the UK, the first 8 professional papers are somewhat Maths-based, but the tougher papers at the end are all written papers, which require a good command of English, a good knowledge of the insurance industry and good critical thinking skills. Throughout my course, the most difficult branch of Maths we did was Calculus and Linear Algebra, and that is not saying much. When you do start working, you will realise that the only Math you need are mostly addition and subtraction. Computer Programming will be the most important skill you will ever need. And to all of those who says that they need Further Math in their A-Levels, I did Math, Economics and Law. If you like Math, do a Mathematics degree.

2. I want to do Actuarial Science because the pay is good.
True, we have one of the highest starting salaries in the business world. Not by much though. The thing is, a qualified actuary does earn a lot. But to get that qualification, one has to pass professional papers, and those are not easy by a mile. The average time it takes to pass all your papers in Malaysia is around 6 years, depending on how good you are. (Some do take more than 10 years) And truth be told, all other professions will be able to earn a satisfactory remuneration within 10 years. If you want the money, go into Investment Banking. In a magazine which I have read, in business, while all other financial workers are paying off their mortgage for their first house, Investment Bankers are buying their second home.

3. I can pass all my professional exams if I work hard enough.
I want to believe this. I really do want to believe this. But with only 50 qualified actuaries in Malaysia, doesn’t it make you doubt that the only reason people are failing is because of a lack of effort? Studying is easy enough. Working is easy enough. Studying while working is not. While I was working in Malaysia, a colleague of mine works from 9 to 7 everyday, if he is lucky. On his way to and back from work, he studies on the LRT. If there is overtime, he will need to stay back and continue working. On weekends, he studies. At night, after being thoroughly exhausted at work, he studies. And while doing all these, he needs to find time for his girlfriend, family and friends. Now, ask yourself this: can you picture yourself doing that for a year? 3 years? 10 years?

I am really glad I chose this course. I know I would spend half my time working staring in a computer at spreadsheets. I know it will be a hard few years in front of me. I also know that I want nothing more than to qualify as a professional actuary, as I do love what I do very much. But I wished I knew what I was in for before I made the decision. And I do hope that people who read this will have the ability to make an informed decision about the course that is Actuarial Science.

zidanedagger
post May 23 2009, 09:16 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
157 posts

Joined: Dec 2008
From: Sabah, Kota Kinabalu


Good effort on opening this thread to clearify what exactly Actuary profession is. I also want to become actuary. I think why malaysia has only 50 actuary maybe due to the paid in malaysia not as attractive as western countries. If I am a (qualified) actuary someday, I will rather go to UK/US look for higher pay (I think at least GP2000). Another reason is the facility/ opportunity(eg, internship) in Malaysia is very little too, only a few institutions are offering actuarial science and most of them aren't able to gain examption in their course, they rather produce the degree in actuarial science rather than train an actuary.

I also have done my research on it. Since you have been studying AS and now working, so I may need your opinion/advise. I'm going to do Maths & Econs degree in NTU coming this august. My formal plan was go into NTU's business and major in AS to gain exemptions but they failed to offer me the course. So I change my plan by do self-study & register examination either during school time or after graduation with degree in maths & econs. I know my life is gonna be very tough, so may i ask you that is this degree relevant to actuarial science?

Actually I still doubt myself am I really like AS or rather maths. So, can you briefly describe what tasks or problems usually an Actuary will deal? What is the most important responsibly /role as an Actuary? Lastly, may i know why you still choose to become an actuary since you have realized that it is not fully maths?

This post has been edited by zidanedagger: May 23 2009, 09:18 AM
Angel01
post May 23 2009, 09:36 AM

Stars @_@
******
Senior Member
1,487 posts

Joined: Jan 2008
From: Penang


wow, that shed some light to me. Mind telling me what was your starting salary?
cks2k2
post May 23 2009, 09:56 AM

...
******
Senior Member
1,966 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: No longer hanging by a NUS

I don't know anyone in the actuarial field, but I know ppl in investment banking and even though they make boat loads of money they work almost non-stop and have pretty much no social life. There was 1 fella in local Citibank: very high 5-figure salary, company car (BMW 5-series), company house (swanky penthouse) but work 6.5 days a week almost full day chasing US and local market. And most of them engage in risky behavior to de-stress (smoke, drink, sex etc).

So don't just make your career decision based on salary. It's a mistake most ppl (including myself) make. sweat.gif
Angel01
post May 23 2009, 09:57 AM

Stars @_@
******
Senior Member
1,487 posts

Joined: Jan 2008
From: Penang


Cks2k2 are you in actuarial field?
yunchee
post May 23 2009, 10:09 AM

New Member
*
Newbie
3 posts

Joined: Apr 2008
Then what is u guys opinion for Civil Engineering field? Is it a good field to join in and does it got a bright future?


Added on May 23, 2009, 10:18 amThen what is u guys opinion for Civil Engineering field? Is it a good field to join in and does it got a bright future?


Added on May 23, 2009, 10:18 amThen what is u guys opinion for Civil Engineering field? Is it a good field to join in and does it got a bright future?

This post has been edited by yunchee: May 23 2009, 10:18 AM
ecVk
post May 23 2009, 10:41 AM

Can somebody say egg?
******
Senior Member
1,142 posts

Joined: Sep 2008
From: Bandar Utama, PJ, TTDI



Very useful post. Is it true that one insurance company only will hire one actuarist?
Angel01
post May 23 2009, 10:48 AM

Stars @_@
******
Senior Member
1,487 posts

Joined: Jan 2008
From: Penang


yunchee go make ur own post...
zidanedagger
post May 23 2009, 11:00 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
157 posts

Joined: Dec 2008
From: Sabah, Kota Kinabalu


QUOTE(ecVk @ May 23 2009, 10:41 AM)
Very useful post. Is it true that one insurance company only will hire one actuarist?
*
I believe it is true. On the other hand, although company only need 1 Actuary ( a lot of people mistaken that actuarial profession is actua + rist, even my english teacher say I'm wrong but in fact there is no actuarist word in dictionary and actuary is a special term for actuarial profession) but they still employ fresh graduate and train them for future replacement or send them to other branches. This mostly can see in those western countries but not in Malaysia.
Cheesenium
post May 23 2009, 11:47 AM

Vigilo Confido
*******
Senior Member
4,852 posts

Joined: Aug 2006
QUOTE
This is the biggest misconception that people have about Actuarial Science. In actual fact, a good knowledge of Mathematics is necessary, but a great knowledge is not. In the UK, the first 8 professional papers are somewhat Maths-based, but the tougher papers at the end are all written papers, which require a good command of English, a good knowledge of the insurance industry and good critical thinking skills. Throughout my course, the most difficult branch of Maths we did was Calculus and Linear Algebra, and that is not saying much. When you do start working, you will realise that the only Math you need are mostly addition and subtraction. Computer Programming will be the most important skill you will ever need. And to all of those who says that they need Further Math in their A-Levels, I did Math, Economics and Law. If you like Math, do a Mathematics degree.


This also applies for engineering.Most of my maths now are still based on basic maths.

And in real life applications,computers do all the dirty job for you.Computer programming is important,IMO.
tanjinjack
post May 23 2009, 12:21 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
4,122 posts

Joined: Jul 2008
From: Malaysia


Great post, hope the mods can pin this up as I do see a lot of people having misconceptions. (including myself for the 3rd one.)

Just want to ask one (couples of) things.
Actuaries do need communication skill don't they?
And often they are offered such high salaries are due to their position who can make crucial decision, right?

Also, it seems that there are more and more people with AS degree venturing other fields for risk managing task. What's your opinion on this?

This post has been edited by tanjinjack: May 23 2009, 12:22 PM
Jyou
post May 23 2009, 12:34 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
171 posts

Joined: Oct 2007
From: Vancouver
Nice thread, I chose not to go through with this field of study because of all 3 reasons.
There has to be a reason why there are so few qualified actuaries in Malaysia, furthermore with the recent publicity this profession has garnered, there has been a drastic influx of students taking up this major, I'd say difficult competition in the future, plus the cut-off rate is rather cruel if you know what I mean. Also I notice several school teachers of mine holding actuarial science degrees and I wonder what happen?
zidanedagger
post May 23 2009, 12:37 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
157 posts

Joined: Dec 2008
From: Sabah, Kota Kinabalu


QUOTE(tanjinjack @ May 23 2009, 12:21 PM)
Great post, hope the mods can pin this up as I do see a lot of people having misconceptions. (including myself for the 3rd one.)

Just want to ask one (couples of) things.
Actuaries do need communication skill don't they?
And often they are offered such high salaries are due to their position who can make crucial decision, right?

Also, it seems that there are more and more people with AS degree venturing other fields for risk managing task. What's your opinion on this?
*
Actuaries need a good communication skill.
IMO Yes, why they offerred well salary because of their unique critical thinking skill, combination of knowledge(finance, insurance, maths, econs & risks) & ability to analysis risks with a wide range of factors.
IMO also the ability to determine the correct factors is far more important than your ability to calculate where calculation is just a small part of the whole project & assume that you already master them. (I need TS to clearify me whether my statement correct or not)
I only heard a lot of AS degree holder in Malaysia and most of them ended up not doing AS instead go to financial industry. Whether they are doing risk management or not I'm not so sure.

This post has been edited by zidanedagger: May 23 2009, 12:38 PM
tanjinjack
post May 23 2009, 12:37 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
4,122 posts

Joined: Jul 2008
From: Malaysia


QUOTE(Jyou @ May 23 2009, 12:34 PM)
Nice thread, I chose not to go through with this field of study because of all 3 reasons.
There has to be a reason why there are so few qualified actuaries in Malaysia, furthermore with the recent publicity this profession has garnered, there has been a drastic influx of students taking up this major, I'd say difficult competition in the future, plus the cut-off rate is rather cruel if you know what I mean. Also I notice several school teachers of mine holding actuarial science degrees and I wonder what happen?
*
I heard from somewhere, most Malaysian actuaries, despite being Fellows, do not work in Malaysia, and hence is not kept in record in ASM.
ecVk
post May 23 2009, 12:41 PM

Can somebody say egg?
******
Senior Member
1,142 posts

Joined: Sep 2008
From: Bandar Utama, PJ, TTDI



QUOTE(zidanedagger @ May 23 2009, 11:00 AM)
I believe it is true. On the other hand, although company only need 1 Actuary ( a lot of people mistaken that actuarial profession is actua + rist, even my english teacher say I'm wrong but in fact there is no actuarist word in dictionary and actuary is a special term for actuarial profession) but they still employ fresh graduate and train them for future replacement or send them to other branches. This mostly can see in those western countries but not in Malaysia.
*
Okay. Thanks for the info. smile.gif
TSmonkeyseemonkeydo
post May 23 2009, 04:59 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
6 posts

Joined: May 2009
QUOTE(zidanedagger @ May 23 2009, 09:16 AM)
Good effort on opening this thread to clearify what exactly Actuary profession is. I also want to become actuary. I think why malaysia has only 50 actuary maybe due to the paid in malaysia not as attractive as western countries. If I am a (qualified) actuary someday, I will rather go to UK/US look for higher pay (I think at least GP2000). Another reason is the facility/ opportunity(eg, internship) in Malaysia is very little too, only a few institutions are offering actuarial science and most of them aren't able to gain examption in their course, they rather produce the degree in actuarial science rather than train an actuary.

I also have done my research on it. Since you have been studying AS and now working, so I may need your opinion/advise. I'm going to do Maths & Econs degree in NTU coming this august. My formal plan was go into NTU's business and major in AS to gain exemptions but they failed to offer me the course. So I change my plan by do self-study & register examination either during school time or after graduation with degree in maths & econs. I know my life is gonna be very tough, so may i ask you that is this degree relevant to actuarial science?

Actually I still doubt myself am I really like AS or rather maths. So, can you briefly describe what tasks or problems usually an Actuary will deal? What is the most important responsibly /role as an Actuary? Lastly, may i know why you still choose to become an actuary since you have realized that it is not fully maths?
*
I'm going to try to answer your questions. First and foremost, a degree in Actuarial Science is not necessary for a career in Actuarial Science. The only reason why people choose to do a degree in Actuarial Science is because they want exemptions from professional papers and want a leg up in them. However, I know for a fact that UK companies do not specifically employ students who did Actuarial Science - they hire people who have any Mathematical background. This is because the papers which you get exemptions from (CT1 - 8) are not difficult. In fact, CT7, the economics paper is just a simpler version of the A Levels Economics Paper! I know people who complete their CTs in a year and a half worth of studying, without any exemptions. One more problem I encounter when having a degree in Actuarial Science is that you pigeon hole yourself into that profession. It doesn't allow you to diversify into many other financial branches as it is so specialised in its own way, and that might be hard for a person who wants to find a job which is not actuarial-related in the future. Truth be told, I applied to do Mathematics in Cambridge as well, and if I had gotten the offer, would have accepted it straightaway.

It is good that you are trying to find out that if it is Maths that you like, or is it AS. Actuary's main industry is insurance. They are risk managers, they try to maintain the solvency of the company by managing the risk effectively. In a nutshell, the work that an actuary does in insurance can be divided into two - Pricing and Valuation. In Pricing, actuaries have to price insurance products so that the company will make a profit. This is not as easy as it sounds because the way insurance works, the company only suffers a loss in the future, and it is up to an actuary to price the product in a way that it is improbable for the company to go bankrupt anytime in the future. That is why we have projections and forecasts. In Valuation, actuaries need to take the premiums that people pay to invest in the best possible assets. This is necessary for the company to make a profit, because many products only allow to break-even, and it is up to the actuary to find the most valuable financial assets to invest in. There are consultant and contractor actuaries as well. They move from company to company advising insurance companies on how best to price their products, how they value their products, how they meet regulation, etc... They are one of the most well-paid people in the field. An actuary can become Chief Financial Officer and eventually CEO of a company. The fact is that insurance companies need us. We are the experts when it comes to the financial matters of an insurance firm.
Do let me know if you require more information.

I like the work. I like the challenge. I like the fact that I have different stuff thrown at me everyday. Sometimes, it does come to a point when I ask myself if it is worth it, especially having to come back from work and put myself in front of books. But I genuinely love the job I am given, and I really don't see myself doing anything else. I think it is the interest that keeps me here, and the fact that I do like applying Mathematics in practical business problems that helps me maintain my interest in the field. Plus, the fact that once I qualify, I'll get a FIA behind my name, which is pretty cool.


Added on May 23, 2009, 5:04 pm
QUOTE(ecVk @ May 23 2009, 10:41 AM)
Very useful post. Is it true that one insurance company only will hire one actuarist?
*
No, that is not true. If that were true, we will be out of work in a few years time, when all the young guns come and take over our positions.

Back in Malaysia, due to the low pass rates, there are usually around 1 - 2 qualified actuaries and many actuarial students in each company. I believe that AIA has around 10 qualified actuaries. In the UK, my team alone had 6 qualifed actuaries. And we were only one really really small part of the company, which I believe had around 60 qualified actuaries alone.

Actuaries have the highest turnover I have ever seen. This is because they are so demanded that they just pretty much move from company to company in search of higher pay.

This post has been edited by monkeyseemonkeydo: May 23 2009, 05:04 PM
SUSOptiplex330
post May 23 2009, 05:12 PM

10k Club
********
Senior Member
12,696 posts

Joined: Aug 2008
For someone who aren't too sure whether they will like this profession or not, would you advise them to do accountancy instead? Since a good accountant would need the same important qualities like analytical ability, critical thinking & communication when they move into management. And many too ended up as CEO aka big bucks. And it is a LOT more flexible when it comes to employment.



TSmonkeyseemonkeydo
post May 23 2009, 05:13 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
6 posts

Joined: May 2009
QUOTE(tanjinjack @ May 23 2009, 12:21 PM)
Great post, hope the mods can pin this up as I do see a lot of people having misconceptions. (including myself for the 3rd one.)

Just want to ask one (couples of) things.
Actuaries do need communication skill don't they?
And often they are offered such high salaries are due to their position who can make crucial decision, right?

Also, it seems that there are more and more people with AS degree venturing other fields for risk managing task. What's your opinion on this?
*
Good point, communication skills is one of the most valued commodity in the actuarial world. This is because what we do in the field is so technical, that normal people will never be able to understand it. Thats is why, we need good communication to be able to present our work in laymen form to higher management. In fact, two of the UK institute papers are based around communication as the Institute has realised how important this skill is to the field. And that is why, I do stress that having a good command of English is necessary to succeed in the actuarial world.

In my opinion, the reason why more and more people with AS degree are venturing into other fields is because they cannot cope with the exams pressure and have decided that they do not want to be an actuary. However, with a degree, we do know how to manage any financial risk, and that is probably why people venture into risk management, which is extremely big now, due to the credit crisis. But bear in mind, that not all companies provide study support to these graduates, and they will most likely end up as risk managers, not actuaries.


Added on May 23, 2009, 5:23 pm
QUOTE(Optiplex330 @ May 23 2009, 05:12 PM)
For someone who aren't too sure whether they will like this profession or not, would you advise them to do accountancy instead? Since a good accountant would need the same important qualities like analytical ability, critical thinking & communication when they move into management. And many too ended up as CEO aka big bucks. And it is a LOT more flexible when it comes to employment.
*
I believe that if someone is not too sure whether they like this profession, they should do more research, talk to some actuaries and go do an internship. The work of an actuary and an accountant is so different that it is hard to compare them both on an equal footing. It all boils down to the individual, I guess. I personally never saw myself as an accountant, hence the choice was easy. I do agree though that when an accountant moves to management, he would need the same qualities, however, the question is, would you like the work thrown at you before you become senior management?

I'm going to be very biased now, and say that it is true that accountants do have more flexibility, but so do actuaries. The fact that qualified accountants are a dime a dozen, is probably gonna make competition tough. Actuaries are elite. smile.gif

This post has been edited by monkeyseemonkeydo: May 23 2009, 05:23 PM
Angel01
post May 23 2009, 06:06 PM

Stars @_@
******
Senior Member
1,487 posts

Joined: Jan 2008
From: Penang


serious, this post should be pinned. Cleared lots of stuff for me.
zidanedagger
post May 23 2009, 07:57 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
157 posts

Joined: Dec 2008
From: Sabah, Kota Kinabalu


» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «


(1)So, is it taking maths & econ degree will be safer to me if I still have doubt about become actuary? But, the problem is what can math & econ degree do beside doing actuary, the course states that with this degree can do risk analyst, finance industry and so on....But wouldn't the employer more appreciate those student with degree in finance & banking or account&finance and so on....?

(2)Huh!? very cool man! Looks like phd, doctor, prof.... cool2.gif

(3)May i know how actuaries work as a team? Wouldn't they crash on different opinions/views about pricing product or valuation?

May i ask that is it actuary only well-paid when working in insurance company? How about working in Central bank, financial company, commercial bank, consultant firm and so on? May i ask what actuarial tasks for you is the most excited & interested?

Thank for answering and clear my doubt! thumbup.gif

This post has been edited by zidanedagger: May 23 2009, 07:58 PM
tanjinjack
post May 23 2009, 08:11 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
4,122 posts

Joined: Jul 2008
From: Malaysia


QUOTE(zidanedagger @ May 23 2009, 07:57 PM)
» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «


(1)So, is it taking maths & econ degree will be safer to me if I still have doubt about become actuary? But, the problem is what can math & econ degree do beside doing actuary, the course states that with this degree can do risk analyst, finance industry and so on....But wouldn't the employer more appreciate those student with degree in finance & banking or account&finance and so on....?

(2)Huh!? very cool man! Looks like phd, doctor, prof....  cool2.gif

(3)May i know how actuaries work as a team? Wouldn't they crash on different opinions/views about pricing product or valuation?

May i ask that is it actuary only well-paid when working in insurance company? How about working in Central bank, financial company, commercial bank, consultant firm and so on? May i ask what actuarial tasks for you is the most excited & interested?

Thank for answering and clear my doubt!  thumbup.gif
*
I believe as long as you are AIA or FIA, meaning qualified actuary, you have very good pay as long as you get into the field that utilises your knowledge.
Certainly the financial company would have to pay you high salary, or else you would just rather stay in the insurance company who pay you well, isn't it?
kaiying
post May 23 2009, 08:51 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
181 posts

Joined: Nov 2008
my smart friends are studying this. wish them luck.

hehe. good topic. at least i know im out of this.
Angel01
post May 23 2009, 09:33 PM

Stars @_@
******
Senior Member
1,487 posts

Joined: Jan 2008
From: Penang


So after reading through all the posts, the most important thing is computer programming and not High level of maths skills?
tanjinjack
post May 23 2009, 10:03 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
4,122 posts

Joined: Jul 2008
From: Malaysia


QUOTE(Angel01 @ May 23 2009, 09:33 PM)
So after reading through all the posts, the most important thing is computer programming and not High level of maths skills?
*
Not necessary computer programming skill.
I believe you need a blend of everything, ie Maths, Econs, Finance, Programming, Communication etc.
You need to have interests in Maths, or else you can't go too far from growing a liking in Actuarial Science.
With the current trend, it is that everything is getting to become computational, and hence computer skill becomes very important.
I believe, AS do involve some tedious Maths which can be simplified by programming knowledge.
Angel01
post May 23 2009, 10:23 PM

Stars @_@
******
Senior Member
1,487 posts

Joined: Jan 2008
From: Penang


i see, so having computer knowledge does help. What type of computer programming skills are we talking about? C++?
tanjinjack
post May 23 2009, 10:34 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
4,122 posts

Joined: Jul 2008
From: Malaysia


QUOTE(Angel01 @ May 23 2009, 10:23 PM)
i see, so having computer knowledge does help. What type of computer programming skills are we talking about? C++?
*
I am not sure about it.
But it seems you need to know Excel very well, and probably a software called PROPHET.
Angel01
post May 23 2009, 10:36 PM

Stars @_@
******
Senior Member
1,487 posts

Joined: Jan 2008
From: Penang


Oh my, my excel is bad because there is the lack of need to use it sad.gif, better backup my excel then smile.gif Thx for the heads up.
tanjinjack
post May 23 2009, 10:38 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
4,122 posts

Joined: Jul 2008
From: Malaysia


QUOTE(Angel01 @ May 23 2009, 10:36 PM)
Oh my, my excel is bad because there is the lack of need to use it sad.gif, better backup my excel then smile.gif Thx for the heads up.
*
Excel is very impressive you know.
Well, to use it to do table, draw graph probably utilises less than 5 percents of Excel.
You check the 'function' they have.
I guess you need to know how to use those functions especially those under the Financial one..

I may be wrong. Correct me if that's the case.
Angel01
post May 23 2009, 10:39 PM

Stars @_@
******
Senior Member
1,487 posts

Joined: Jan 2008
From: Penang


Hey, any place to learn excel ? Cause the only way i learned abt com stuff was having a project or a need to use it smile.gif
TSmonkeyseemonkeydo
post May 24 2009, 05:34 AM

New Member
*
Junior Member
6 posts

Joined: May 2009
This post is just to bump this thread up to the front page again
OMG!
post May 24 2009, 09:09 AM

Raymond
******
Senior Member
1,397 posts

Joined: Jan 2009
From: Peaceful Island



精算学是一门研究意外、风险事件对财务、经济及商业上所产生的影响之科系。此科系需要将各种影响化为数据,并深入探讨与研究这些数据,以保持工商金融界等在市场上的敏锐度、竞争力及内部的财务稳定。因此,学生不仅须学习各种概率、统计学等分析技术,以研究分析死亡率、制作生命表、应用利息等精算学传统课题,也须学习各种财务金融、经济、保险、会计、风险管理等方面的学问。


学习内容: 此科系的课程内容包括了基础经济学、运算法则、统计学、排列组合、会计与金融、精算数学、风险理论、保险学、利息理论、投资分析与组合管理等等。


未来出路: 毕业生一般可在商业界,如保险公司、金融机构等的精算部门担任精算师或精算顾问。除此之外,也可以自行开业,对企业提供财经投资、风险管理、员工退休福利计划及公司资产管理等提供咨询服务。



Angel01
post May 24 2009, 11:09 AM

Stars @_@
******
Senior Member
1,487 posts

Joined: Jan 2008
From: Penang


Omg! can you translate that to English please? This is an English Forum.
Thank you.
ecVk
post May 24 2009, 11:43 AM

Can somebody say egg?
******
Senior Member
1,142 posts

Joined: Sep 2008
From: Bandar Utama, PJ, TTDI



QUOTE(OMG! @ May 24 2009, 09:09 AM)
精算学是一门研究意外、风险事件对财务、经济及商业上所产生的影响之科系。此科系需要将各种影响化为数据,并深入探讨与研究这些数据,以保持工商金融界等在市场上的敏锐度、竞争力及内部的财务稳定。因此,学生不仅须学习各种概率、统计学等分析技术,以研究分析死亡率、制作生命表、应用利息等精算学传统课题,也须学习各种财务金融、经济、保险、会计、风险管理等方面的学问。

 
学习内容: 此科系的课程内容包括了基础经济学、运算法则、统计学、排列组合、会计与金融、精算数学、风险理论、保险学、利息理论、投资分析与组合管理等等。

 
未来出路: 毕业生一般可在商业界,如保险公司、金融机构等的精算部门担任精算师或精算顾问。除此之外,也可以自行开业,对企业提供财经投资、风险管理、员工退休福利计划及公司资产管理等提供咨询服务。
*
Dude, i dont get what your saying -.-
qiqi91
post May 24 2009, 12:16 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
40 posts

Joined: Mar 2009


TS, i wanna ask, what professional body u joined for ur professional exams?(eg,SOA,IOA,....)
is it the exams r different for different bodies?
n i heard dat the exams for SOA already changed into something like 5 preliminary, 3 VEE, etc....(i forget d), can u clarify more??
tanjinjack
post May 25 2009, 01:16 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
4,122 posts

Joined: Jul 2008
From: Malaysia


QUOTE(qiqi91 @ May 24 2009, 12:16 PM)
TS, i wanna ask, what professional body u joined for ur professional exams?(eg,SOA,IOA,....)
is it the exams r different for different bodies?
n i heard dat the exams for SOA already changed into something like 5 preliminary, 3 VEE, etc....(i forget d), can u clarify more??
*
Bumping this wonderful thread up.

I believe TS is under the IA or FA, Institute of Actuaries or Faculty of Actuaries, depending on which university in UK he goes to. Scottish universities, like Heriot-Watt is under FA, where those in England is under IA.

Exams are different from different bodies, but some of them are similar.
For instance, the IAA(Australia) has similar papers with the UK. (Did they just buy the papers?)


Added on May 25, 2009, 1:41 amA question to TS.

Is being an actuary a stressful job?

This post has been edited by tanjinjack: May 25 2009, 01:41 AM
TSmonkeyseemonkeydo
post May 25 2009, 05:53 AM

New Member
*
Junior Member
6 posts

Joined: May 2009
QUOTE(qiqi91 @ May 24 2009, 12:16 PM)
TS, i wanna ask, what professional body u joined for ur professional exams?(eg,SOA,IOA,....)
is it the exams r different for different bodies?
n i heard dat the exams for SOA already changed into something like 5 preliminary, 3 VEE, etc....(i forget d), can u clarify more??
*
I'm doing the papers under the UK body, the Institute of Actuaries.
I would expect the exams to be not entirely different. Most Malaysian companies would encourage their student to do the American board though, as there are fewer papers to take.
I would not be able to tell you about the SOA as I do not have experience with the American body.


Added on May 25, 2009, 5:56 am
QUOTE(tanjinjack @ May 25 2009, 01:16 AM)
Bumping this wonderful thread up.

I believe TS is under the IA or FA, Institute of Actuaries or Faculty of Actuaries, depending on which university in UK he goes to. Scottish universities, like Heriot-Watt is under FA, where those in England is under IA.

Exams are different from different bodies, but some of them are similar.
For instance, the IAA(Australia) has similar papers with the UK. (Did they just buy the papers?)


Added on May 25, 2009, 1:41 amA question to TS.

Is being an actuary a stressful job?
*
I'm not too sure how you would define stressful. I would say it can be stressful being an actuarial student as you would have to work and study at the same time. Being a qualified actuary would give you more responsibilities, so it could potentially be stressful as well.

Working in Malaysia is like working in all Asian countries, your employers really expect a lot from you and working 9 to 9 is the norm, not the exception.

This post has been edited by monkeyseemonkeydo: May 25 2009, 05:56 AM
Angel01
post May 25 2009, 03:13 PM

Stars @_@
******
Senior Member
1,487 posts

Joined: Jan 2008
From: Penang


the industry is not as developed(Malaysia) as other countries is it?
vanPersieXX
post May 25 2009, 04:45 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
117 posts

Joined: Oct 2008
can one registers for the exam (IOA board) even though he still in his first year in a unrelated degree?is tat possible?
zidanedagger
post May 25 2009, 07:12 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
157 posts

Joined: Dec 2008
From: Sabah, Kota Kinabalu


yea, the Actuary profession bodies have no restriction. I heard my brother said one of his friends who were taking engineering but went to take the exam.
CFLow
post May 25 2009, 07:28 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
117 posts

Joined: Mar 2009


with a degree in Engineering or other maths based degree, student can actually pursue to a MSc in Actuarial, and some MSc equip the students with essential knowledge of Actuarial, and exemption from IA CT1-8 will be given. However, this might be too tough as Undergraduate 3 years squeeze into 1 year MSc...
TSmonkeyseemonkeydo
post May 26 2009, 07:30 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
6 posts

Joined: May 2009
QUOTE(Angel01 @ May 25 2009, 03:13 PM)
the industry is not as developed(Malaysia) as other countries is it?
*
No, unfortunately, it isn't. However, this just means that actuaries are even more vital for the progress of the industry.
tanjinjack
post May 26 2009, 08:58 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
4,122 posts

Joined: Jul 2008
From: Malaysia


QUOTE(CFLow @ May 25 2009, 07:28 PM)
with a degree in Engineering or other maths based degree, student can actually pursue to a MSc in Actuarial, and some MSc equip the students with essential knowledge of Actuarial, and exemption from IA CT1-8 will be given. However, this might be too tough as Undergraduate 3 years squeeze into 1 year MSc...
*
But let's not forget the knowledge they gain in their Bachelor degree, where it builds the road for them to do the MSc. After all, the university won't admit students into their MSc course if the students are not competent enough.
Seeing that MSc and BSc can all lead to exemptions, I think it really doesn't matter if one starts out with other first degree.
zidanedagger
post May 27 2009, 08:52 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
157 posts

Joined: Dec 2008
From: Sabah, Kota Kinabalu


I have a friend says that "Nowaday, the economic recession has made insurance companies hardly survive, in order to cut their cost employer train those "experience" workers to do actuarial tasks to substitute qualified actuary" So, is it possible such phenomena happen as I thought Actuary is not only well paid and the demand always there.
rpg
post Jun 7 2009, 05:50 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
317 posts

Joined: Jun 2006


QUOTE(yunchee @ May 23 2009, 10:09 AM)
Then what is u guys opinion for Civil Engineering field? Is it a good field to join in and does it got a bright future?

*
it does have a bright future, i guess you must be deciding which course to study?

my girl friend work 3-5 yrs can get 5K per month---civil engineer. Degree holder of course.

just make sure u plan your courses and career properly. Experience is what counts, not that piece of cert. There are too many civil engineer nowadays, so to make your mark in the field.

This post has been edited by rpg: Jun 7 2009, 05:53 PM
xzjasonzx
post Jun 9 2009, 05:16 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
234 posts

Joined: Jun 2009
If I were to take A level before going for actuarial courses, should I enroll in art stream or science stream, or is it the subjects I take that matters?

What if I'm not so sure whether or not to take up actuarial science, is it a wice decision to go into science stream instead of arts stream (with further maths of course)?

I read that an actuarist's qualification comes from the professional exams, so, I'm wondering, if a person graduate from University ABC with a degree in XYZ, and he manage to score in the professional papers, does he qualify to be recognised and work as an actuarist like others?

Is an actuarial student married to the book for the next 10 years of his life?

This post has been edited by xzjasonzx: Jun 9 2009, 05:28 PM
mumeichan
post Jun 9 2009, 07:54 PM

Member
*******
Senior Member
4,152 posts

Joined: May 2005
QUOTE(xzjasonzx @ Jun 9 2009, 05:16 PM)
If I were to take A level before going for actuarial courses, should I enroll in art stream or science stream, or is it the subjects I take that matters?

What if I'm not so sure whether or not to take up actuarial science, is it a wice decision to go into science stream instead of arts stream (with further maths of course)?

I read that an actuarist's qualification comes from the professional exams, so, I'm wondering, if a person graduate from University ABC with a degree in XYZ, and he manage to score in the professional papers, does he qualify to be recognised and work as an actuarist like others?

Is an actuarial student married to the book for the next 10 years of his life?
*
It doesn't really matter what subjects you take for your A-Levels as long as you take Math and Further Math. Maybe if you take Econs you will cover your Micro and Macro Econs for your first year of your Actuarial degree course. And well if you're aiming for the top unis A in science > A in arts.

You recognition as a qualified actuary depends solely on your association with the actuarial body you took the test wth and who certifies you.

You won't be tied to the book unless you really want to complete all the actuarial papers. With the knowledge you learned from your degree course, you can easily go to any financial, investment, marketing or business line.
xzjasonzx
post Jun 10 2009, 12:05 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
234 posts

Joined: Jun 2009
The college of my choice does not have further maths in the arts stream, so should I take up science stream instead or arts stream without the crucial further maths?
interkk
post Jun 10 2009, 08:27 AM

New Member
*
Newbie
2 posts

Joined: Jun 2009
I want to ask a few question....

1)Many people say actuarial are focused on insurance industry.if we work on finance it say that our paid are lower because not fully utilize our capability (like there is no different between the finance grad ).
is it true??

2)Is the actuarial level knowledge in finance or account are same with finance and account grad??

3)how many paper we need to finish in professional exam??

4)I like involve in investment industry.is it suitable for me to take actuary science??

5)Is it becoming an actuary make you special and more important than accountant and finance worker??
mumeichan
post Jun 10 2009, 09:40 AM

Member
*******
Senior Member
4,152 posts

Joined: May 2005
QUOTE(interkk @ Jun 10 2009, 08:27 AM)
I want to ask a few question....

1)Many people say actuarial are  focused on insurance industry.if we work on finance it say that our paid are lower because not fully utilize our capability (like there is no different between the finance  grad ).
is it true??

2)Is the actuarial level knowledge in finance or account are same with finance and account grad??

3)how many paper we need to finish in professional exam??

4)I like involve in investment industry.is it suitable for me to take actuary science??

5)Is it becoming an actuary make you special and more important than accountant and finance worker??
*
1) Actuaries aren't focused on the insurance industry. They specialization is basically risk management and in order to do that they have to have a wide range of knowledge. As long as you work as an 'actuary' you pay in roughly the same regardless of what industry you work in. Of course some companies demand more skills from you and some less and there may be a little difference, but just a little in general.

2)Actuarial grads don't learn accounts as far as i know, at least they don't have to. Accounts is not needed for them to do their job. Actuarial grads don't learn some stuff finance grads learn. Finance is basically managing the company's finances and an actuary is risk management and they help out in estimating prices, returns of investments, premiums, marketing etc.

3)More papers you pass higher your qualification

4)You are not any more important than the window cleaner.
interkk
post Jun 14 2009, 09:21 PM

New Member
*
Newbie
2 posts

Joined: Jun 2009
i will graduate from uitm taking diploma in investment analysis.next i want to take actuary science.so which path is better:

a)pursuit in degree in finance and then take actuary professional exam or;

b)taking degree in actuary science for 3or 4 years and next take professional exam .
thistle
post Jun 18 2009, 08:12 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
321 posts

Joined: Jan 2005
From: Penang


QUOTE(xzjasonzx @ Jun 10 2009, 12:05 AM)
The college of my choice does not have further maths in the arts stream, so should I take up science stream instead or arts stream without the crucial further maths?
*
Take Science stream! Economics is relatively easy, I don't think you'll be missing out if you don't take it at A Level.
LukeMjstc
post Jun 23 2009, 10:50 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
50 posts

Joined: Jun 2009
QUOTE
Take Science stream! Economics is relatively easy, I don't think you'll be missing out if you don't take it at A Level.


Agreed. I choose to enter science stream back at f4 althou i've love to do bout business/finance field due to the fact that those art knowledges are relatively easier to be obtained, even thru daily life but science knowledges aren't

IMO, only choose actuarial science if you've extremely good analysing ability combined with decent maths skill. You must love figures if you wanted to do it. Otherwise, your life will be miserable.

And you must also love this phrase from SoA: Risk is Opportunity =)
zidanedagger
post Jun 24 2009, 01:24 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
157 posts

Joined: Dec 2008
From: Sabah, Kota Kinabalu


QUOTE(LukeMjstc @ Jun 23 2009, 10:50 PM)
Agreed. I choose to enter science stream back at f4 althou i've love to do bout business/finance field due to the fact that those art knowledges are relatively easier to be obtained, even thru daily life but science knowledges aren't

IMO, only choose actuarial science if you've extremely good analysing ability combined with decent maths skill. You must love figures if you wanted to do it. Otherwise, your life will be miserable.

And you must also love this phrase from SoA: Risk is Opportunity =)
*
I like it! drool.gif It's become my motivation to pursue Actuary now.
epplegaara
post Jul 3 2009, 08:54 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
52 posts

Joined: Jun 2009


wow..i never knew this course will be that sophisticate..i'm a 2009 SPM student and 4 months to go to sit for the exam.
i'm very interested in actuary because:
-there are not many fully qualifed actuary in M'sia
-the course which has one of the highest dropout
-i can have FIA in back of my name which makes me special
-i will be a well know profession(dislike earning lucratively without knowledge)
-all my friends went for doctor and yes they are top students in my school including me;first and second place is my friend while i'm in the thrid place.)
-i don't believe that being a doctor is the only lucrative job there is.(non-financial worries)

Oh yes..what if i take pure Actuarial Science?
is it better for taking Actua and Econs?which i still can't understand =.=
when you said taking both actuary and econs,did you mean that its like a double degree program?
pls reply T_T

This post has been edited by epplegaara: Jul 3 2009, 08:54 AM
Darkmage12
post Jul 3 2009, 07:24 PM

shhhhhhhhh come i tell you something hehe
********
All Stars
17,053 posts

Joined: Jan 2003

How many professional papers are there for the UK and US body respectively?
tanjinjack
post Jul 3 2009, 08:22 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
4,122 posts

Joined: Jul 2008
From: Malaysia


QUOTE(epplegaara @ Jul 3 2009, 08:54 AM)
wow..i never knew this course will be that sophisticate..i'm a 2009 SPM student and 4 months to go to sit for the exam.
i'm very interested in actuary because:
-there are not many fully qualifed actuary in M'sia
-the course which has one of the highest dropout
-i can have FIA in back of my name which makes me special
-i will be a well know profession(dislike earning lucratively without knowledge)
-all my friends went for doctor and yes they are top students in my school including me;first and second place is my friend while i'm in the thrid place.)
-i don't believe that being a doctor is the only lucrative job there is.(non-financial worries)

Oh yes..what if i take pure Actuarial Science?
is it better for taking Actua and Econs?which i still can't understand =.=
when you said taking both actuary and econs,did you mean that its like a double degree program?
pls reply T_T
*
It's good to have interest, but I didn't read that you have immense interest in Maths.
Ultimately, choose a career that you like, not having the best opportunities, best income out there.
If you like Maths, then consider a degree with strong component of Maths (not necessary Acutarial Science).
If you like dancing, you can go all the way learn dancing and do not own any degree.
It's your life after all. Enjoy it with your preferred career.


QUOTE(Darkmage12 @ Jul 3 2009, 07:24 PM)
How many professional papers are there for the UK and US body respectively?
*
UK..
9 CTs
3 CAs
5 STs, complete 2.
5 SAs, complete 1.

When you reach CA, you are Associate.
When you complete all, you are Fellow.
Darkmage12
post Jul 3 2009, 08:56 PM

shhhhhhhhh come i tell you something hehe
********
All Stars
17,053 posts

Joined: Jan 2003

QUOTE(tanjinjack @ Jul 3 2009, 08:22 PM)
It's good to have interest, but I didn't read that you have immense interest in Maths.
Ultimately, choose a career that you like, not having the best opportunities, best income out there.
If you like Maths, then consider a degree with strong component of Maths (not necessary Acutarial Science).
If you like dancing, you can go all the way learn dancing and do not own any degree.
It's your life after all. Enjoy it with your preferred career.
UK..
9 CTs
3 CAs
5 STs, complete 2.
5 SAs, complete 1.

When you reach CA, you are Associate.
When you complete all, you are Fellow.
*
so basically there are a total of 9+3+2+1 = 15 papers to complete out of the 22?
tanjinjack
post Jul 3 2009, 09:21 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
4,122 posts

Joined: Jul 2008
From: Malaysia


QUOTE(Darkmage12 @ Jul 3 2009, 08:56 PM)
so basically there are a total of 9+3+2+1 = 15 papers to complete out of the 22?
*
Indeed.
Nonetheless, some papers can only be passed by attending seminars, like CT9 and CA2.
Some papers can be exempted through academic qualification, usually the CT1 to CT8.
Very few universities offer exemptions up till CAs.
epplegaara
post Jul 4 2009, 04:08 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
52 posts

Joined: Jun 2009


QUOTE(tanjinjack @ Jul 3 2009, 08:22 PM)
It's good to have interest, but I didn't read that you have immense interest in Maths.
Ultimately, choose a career that you like, not having the best opportunities, best income out there.
If you like Maths, then consider a degree with strong component of Maths (not necessary Acutarial Science).
If you like dancing, you can go all the way learn dancing and do not own any degree.
It's your life after all. Enjoy it with your preferred career.
UK..
9 CTs
3 CAs
5 STs, complete 2.
5 SAs, complete 1.

When you reach CA, you are Associate.
When you complete all, you are Fellow.
*
i do have interest in maths...rank 3 in school since form 4 started..not being arrogant but i love solving complex questions..but.. my first ambition was to be an engineer...however when i found out that engineer do not earn much even though its considered profession work and hard to study..i decided not to persuit that ambition..i score A1 in all subject..and frankly i love physic and chemistry more that maths...

my friends are going to be elite someday and i want to join them,because i know i deserve it because i'm a determine person and i'm studying 4 hours per day (after shcool)

i have read an article from real Actuary,they said being actuary does mean we need to be top rank Maths student,but need to have wide knowledge and determination because i will be solving ONE question for hours or so...

This post has been edited by epplegaara: Jul 4 2009, 04:12 PM
bbjslee
post Jul 4 2009, 04:55 PM

Benkyo benkyo benkyo
*******
Senior Member
2,247 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Kuala Lumpur


QUOTE(epplegaara @ Jul 4 2009, 04:08 PM)
i do have interest in maths...rank 3 in school since form 4 started..not being arrogant but i love solving complex questions..but.. my first ambition was to be an engineer...however when i found out that engineer do not earn much even though its considered profession work and hard to study..i decided not to persuit that ambition..i score A1 in all subject..and frankly i love physic and chemistry more that maths...

my friends are going to be elite someday and i want to join them,because i know i deserve it because i'm a determine person and i'm studying 4 hours per day (after shcool)

i have read an article from real Actuary,they said being actuary does mean we need to be top rank Maths student,but need to have wide knowledge and determination because i will be solving ONE question for  hours or so...
*
So you're in mainly due to the income?
Might as well go into Oil & Gas. Few yrs experience, easily 5 figures.
Most O&G companies minimum 3 months bonus.
You can utilize your love for chemistry there.
epplegaara
post Jul 4 2009, 06:53 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
52 posts

Joined: Jun 2009


QUOTE(bbjslee @ Jul 4 2009, 04:55 PM)
So you're in mainly due to the income?
Might as well go into Oil & Gas. Few yrs experience, easily 5 figures.
Most O&G companies minimum 3 months bonus.
You can utilize your love for chemistry there.
*
lol , really? tell you something.. just a gossip among students in my school or whole malaysia..chinese students won't be as easy as malay student to get oil and gas course..(my MALAY teacher told me and MALAY friends)<not being racial criticism zzz.. yawn.gif

take this,other developing countries like Dubai,are paid lucratively no matter what type of engineer,in Malaysia,high salary is based on TYPE OF ENGINEER,and of course oil and gas engineer are highly paid,this is because we have petroleum in our country,however you think they want non-bumi citizens to govern entire professional jobs?only one university in malaysia offer this course and that is universiti teknologi petroleum malaysia,they decide,they control,they teaches and they will decide your future mad.gif

however if i have the opportunity i will definitely considere it biggrin.gif

so thats why i'm taking actuarial science locally or overseas, not mainly because of the highly paid but the specialties,i feel that being actuary is very special because they can solve something that most ppl can't ,just like doctor >.< for engineer,all you need is the basic knowledge and the company or government will supply the TOOLS for it,all you need to do is read the mannual book zz which i think this is one of the reasons engineer salary is low because our country only IMPORT never INVENT...

so.. HELLO ACTUARY!!! rclxms.gif
tanjinjack
post Jul 4 2009, 09:37 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
4,122 posts

Joined: Jul 2008
From: Malaysia


QUOTE(epplegaara @ Jul 4 2009, 06:53 PM)
lol , really? tell you something.. just a gossip among students in my school or whole malaysia..chinese students won't be as easy as malay student to get oil and gas course..(my MALAY teacher told me and MALAY friends)<not being racial criticism zzz.. yawn.gif

take this,other developing countries like Dubai,are paid lucratively no matter what type of engineer,in Malaysia,high salary is based on TYPE OF ENGINEER,and of course oil and gas engineer are highly paid,this is because we have petroleum in our country,however you think they want non-bumi citizens to govern entire professional jobs?only one university in malaysia offer this course and that is universiti teknologi petroleum malaysia,they decide,they control,they teaches and they will decide your future mad.gif

however if i have the opportunity i will definitely considere it  biggrin.gif 

so thats why i'm taking actuarial science locally or overseas, not mainly because of the highly paid but the specialties,i feel that being actuary is very special because they can solve something that most ppl can't ,just like doctor >.< for engineer,all you need is the basic knowledge and the company or government will supply the TOOLS for it,all you need to do is read the mannual book zz which i think this is one of the reasons engineer salary is low because our country only IMPORT never INVENT...

so.. HELLO ACTUARY!!! rclxms.gif
*
I don't take that as an insult to say that engineer is just someone who reads manual book and do things with supplied tools. I take it as you being a bit too young and ignorant. Period.

As someone who is also good in Maths and have been at the verge of nearly go to Actuarial Science (I can do it now, if I want to, having a partial scholarship from a UK university), I really find interest/passion to the course is very important. Don't be blinded when choosing a course. I really feel that if you were to cross out a profession in your list, it's best with a reason you don't like it, instead of telling out the weakness/ bad things about the job. Every profession has its bad and dirty side.
Actuary, although I am not in the industry, is a job in office. Any office conspiracy and politics should apply to actuary as well, especially him/her being someone who is unique in a group.

Why are you looking for high pay?
Is using money as a blanket a very happy thing to do?
Is using money as toilet paper a very happy thing to do?
Is using money as fuel to lit up lamp a very happy thing to do?

Money is not the factor in choosing course, but interest.
I don't think you really digest the opening post of this thread.
I am not discouraging you from becoming an actuary, but I really wish people would consider well before going.
Please please, think wisely and carefully.
You are biased, if I want to conclude.

(I don't wish to bring up what an engineer is going to do, and don't think will make a engineer vs actuary post. This is a post of actuary.)
Darkmage12
post Jul 4 2009, 11:42 PM

shhhhhhhhh come i tell you something hehe
********
All Stars
17,053 posts

Joined: Jan 2003

QUOTE(epplegaara @ Jul 4 2009, 06:53 PM)
lol , really? tell you something.. just a gossip among students in my school or whole malaysia..chinese students won't be as easy as malay student to get oil and gas course..(my MALAY teacher told me and MALAY friends)<not being racial criticism zzz.. yawn.gif

take this,other developing countries like Dubai,are paid lucratively no matter what type of engineer,in Malaysia,high salary is based on TYPE OF ENGINEER,and of course oil and gas engineer are highly paid,this is because we have petroleum in our country,however you think they want non-bumi citizens to govern entire professional jobs?only one university in malaysia offer this course and that is universiti teknologi petroleum malaysia,they decide,they control,they teaches and they will decide your future mad.gif

however if i have the opportunity i will definitely considere it  biggrin.gif 

so thats why i'm taking actuarial science locally or overseas, not mainly because of the highly paid but the specialties,i feel that being actuary is very special because they can solve something that most ppl can't ,just like doctor >.< for engineer,all you need is the basic knowledge and the company or government will supply the TOOLS for it,all you need to do is read the mannual book zz which i think this is one of the reasons engineer salary is low because our country only IMPORT never INVENT...

so.. HELLO ACTUARY!!! rclxms.gif
*
Yes Dubai WAS highly paid until recently.....now many projects lack of funding.... besides that without good negotiation skills you might actually be getting paid way below the supposed market rate for ur expertise
kwh1989
post Jul 5 2009, 12:56 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
412 posts

Joined: Jul 2005



QUOTE(epplegaara @ Jul 4 2009, 06:53 PM)
lol , really? tell you something.. just a gossip among students in my school or whole malaysia..chinese students won't be as easy as malay student to get oil and gas course..(my MALAY teacher told me and MALAY friends)<not being racial criticism zzz.. yawn.gif

take this,other developing countries like Dubai,are paid lucratively no matter what type of engineer,in Malaysia,high salary is based on TYPE OF ENGINEER,and of course oil and gas engineer are highly paid,this is because we have petroleum in our country,however you think they want non-bumi citizens to govern entire professional jobs?only one university in malaysia offer this course and that is universiti teknologi petroleum malaysia,they decide,they control,they teaches and they will decide your future mad.gif

however if i have the opportunity i will definitely considere it  biggrin.gif 

so thats why i'm taking actuarial science locally or overseas, not mainly because of the highly paid but the specialties,i feel that being actuary is very special because they can solve something that most ppl can't ,just like doctor >.< for engineer,all you need is the basic knowledge and the company or government will supply the TOOLS for it,all you need to do is read the mannual book zz which i think this is one of the reasons engineer salary is low because our country only IMPORT never INVENT...

so.. HELLO ACTUARY!!! rclxms.gif
*
from ur previous posts, i dare say, u are just like any other people, thinking that good in maths will be able to grant u the entry to the field of actuarial studies.

1st of all, kindly read back the 1st post by TS, math is important, but if u are so into math, taking a math degree will be better for u

2ndly, actuarial studies is a combination of finance, accounting, econs, sociology and math, actuary does not spend time solving math question in their work. They analyze, calculate with computer programs and come out with a set of premiums that will maximize the profit of the company they are working for (insurance sector).

3rdly, read back the 1st post again, its great to know that a real actuary started this thread to guide those wanting to pursue this field.

epplegaara, a word for you, great in math for high school level doesnt mean u will be great in uni level, it merely suggests that u have a good grasp of basic. u are still young, immature? take time to discover the world after SPM.
bbjslee
post Jul 5 2009, 05:17 PM

Benkyo benkyo benkyo
*******
Senior Member
2,247 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Kuala Lumpur


QUOTE(epplegaara @ Jul 4 2009, 06:53 PM)
lol , really? tell you something.. just a gossip among students in my school or whole malaysia..chinese students won't be as easy as malay student to get oil and gas course..(my MALAY teacher told me and MALAY friends)<not being racial criticism zzz.. yawn.gif

take this,other developing countries like Dubai,are paid lucratively no matter what type of engineer,in Malaysia,high salary is based on TYPE OF ENGINEER,and of course oil and gas engineer are highly paid,this is because we have petroleum in our country,however you think they want non-bumi citizens to govern entire professional jobs?only one university in malaysia offer this course and that is universiti teknologi petroleum malaysia,they decide,they control,they teaches and they will decide your future mad.gif

however if i have the opportunity i will definitely considere it  biggrin.gif 

so thats why i'm taking actuarial science locally or overseas, not mainly because of the highly paid but the specialties,i feel that being actuary is very special because they can solve something that most ppl can't ,just like doctor >.< for engineer,all you need is the basic knowledge and the company or government will supply the TOOLS for it,all you need to do is read the mannual book zz which i think this is one of the reasons engineer salary is low because our country only IMPORT never INVENT...

so.. HELLO ACTUARY!!! rclxms.gif
*
What job in oil and gas are you talking about?
There are so many. My Chinese friend works in Petronas. When you talk about O&G don't just think about Petronas. There are so many foreign companies like Shell, Schlumberger. Schlumberger do pay better than Petronas.
Why not O&G traders? They earn bonus like 12 months, and even 24 months during good time.

Chemical engineers are "engineers" too, they are higly sought after by O&G companies.
"All you need to read is manual book" are for technicians, not engineers. You have a very wrong perception of engineers. Which engineering field you talking about? Chemical? Electronics? Civil? etc...

Go to Job & careers section, read up some posts and post some questions there. I feel that your view is too narrow for now.
NaDou
post Jul 5 2009, 06:15 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
204 posts

Joined: Feb 2009
THank for the share.
epplegaara
post Jul 7 2009, 08:18 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
52 posts

Joined: Jun 2009


ya i think i'm still young but engineers really don't earn much in malaysia,i don't want to have a salary range 2k -8k with many years of experience,and it is not fair,i dare you persuit engineer course and i'm sure you will end up with normal life,and i hate normal life.excelling in studies is useless if the rewarding sucks,i rather continue my parents business if i know my PROFESSIONAl job is useless,sure some much but very few

and why everyone is agains me?because i said i was proficient in maths?
hey i did said being actuary need a wide range of knowledge,communication skill,and yes i know actuary is the combination of comerce study,and i don't think anyone who are persuing to be an actuary have the same perspective as you guys,

ya this forum is about the path to be an actuary,

and kwh1986 ,engineer is an easy course in M'sia no doubt,just having credits can be engineer

bbjslee wth are you talking about?the foreign companies you said just offer job not course,employee always have bonus sia zz

and kwh1989,don't criticise me if you don't know my history of study,you might think i'm being arrogant ,but what are you talking about?spm is the BASIC of everything -.-
those dropout are those who fail because they slack during course

actuary is a job which deals with risk,anyone who loves to solve math will be disappointed because actuary solve probability ,statistic and so on
i love probability chapter add math so think i should persuit actuarial course and i love challenge.
as from what i read in an acticle made by actuary,maths will not be the major problem to be a n actuary,is the determination,ingenuity and ability to think outside the box.

and tan,choosing a job based on interest is very good no doubt

This post has been edited by epplegaara: Jul 7 2009, 08:24 PM
tanjinjack
post Jul 7 2009, 08:48 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
4,122 posts

Joined: Jul 2008
From: Malaysia


QUOTE(epplegaara @ Jul 7 2009, 08:18 PM)
ya i think i'm still young but engineers really don't earn much in malaysia,i don't want to have a salary range 2k -8k with many years of experience,and it is not fair,i dare you persuit engineer course and i'm sure you will end up with normal life,and i hate normal life.excelling in studies is useless if the rewarding sucks,i rather continue my parents business if i know my PROFESSIONAl job is useless,sure some much but very few

and why everyone is agains me?because i said i was proficient in maths?
hey i did said being actuary need a wide range of knowledge,communication skill,and yes i know actuary is the combination of comerce study,and i don't think anyone who are persuing to be an actuary have the same perspective as you guys,

ya this forum is about the path to be an actuary,

and kwh1986 ,engineer is an easy course in M'sia no doubt,just having credits can be engineer

bbjslee wth are you talking about?the foreign companies you said just offer job not course,employee always have bonus sia zz

and kwh1989,don't criticise me if you don't know my history of study,you might think i'm being arrogant ,but what are you talking about?spm is the BASIC of everything -.-
those dropout are those who fail because they slack during course

actuary is a job which deals with risk,anyone who loves to solve math will be disappointed because actuary solve probability ,statistic and so on
i love probability chapter  add math so think i should persuit actuarial course and i love challenge.
as from what i read in an acticle made by actuary,maths will not be the major problem to be a n actuary,is the determination,ingenuity and ability to think outside the box.

and tan,choosing a job based on interest is very good no doubt
*
Take some time to think, my friend.
Don't refute for the sake of refute.
kwh1989
post Jul 8 2009, 01:58 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
412 posts

Joined: Jul 2005



QUOTE(epplegaara @ Jul 7 2009, 08:18 PM)
ya i think i'm still young but engineers really don't earn much in malaysia,i don't want to have a salary range 2k -8k with many years of experience,and it is not fair,i dare you persuit engineer course and i'm sure you will end up with normal life,and i hate normal life.excelling in studies is useless if the rewarding sucks,i rather continue my parents business if i know my PROFESSIONAl job is useless,sure some much but very few

and why everyone is agains me?because i said i was proficient in maths?
hey i did said being actuary need a wide range of knowledge,communication skill,and yes i know actuary is the combination of comerce study,and i don't think anyone who are persuing to be an actuary have the same perspective as you guys,

ya this forum is about the path to be an actuary,

and kwh1986 ,engineer is an easy course in M'sia no doubt,just having credits can be engineer

bbjslee wth are you talking about?the foreign companies you said just offer job not course,employee always have bonus sia zz

and kwh1989,don't criticise me if you don't know my history of study,you might think i'm being arrogant ,but what are you talking about?spm is the BASIC of everything -.-
those dropout are those who fail because they slack during course

actuary is a job which deals with risk,anyone who loves to solve math will be disappointed because actuary solve probability ,statistic and so on
i love probability chapter  add math so think i should persuit actuarial course and i love challenge.
as from what i read in an acticle made by actuary,maths will not be the major problem to be a n actuary,is the determination,ingenuity and ability to think outside the box.

and tan,choosing a job based on interest is very good no doubt
*
haha, u sounded as if u really know wut probability is about? kiddo, like i said, u got a lot to learn, and for your information, im taking actuarial studies as my major now, and im entering 2nd year soon. and ppl here mostly started their degree, even tanjinjack is an engineering student. so most of us here experienced sth u have yet to explore, we are viewing our opinions because im pretty sure by the time u started degree, u will share the same pov as us now. in the mean time, u r juz a kid....closed in a box by malaysia education system?
epplegaara
post Jul 8 2009, 09:50 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
52 posts

Joined: Jun 2009


okay, i believ you smile.gif


Added on July 9, 2009, 5:25 pmany idea oversea or local actuarial course better?
after graduate,which paper is the most recognise?example SOA

oh and the salary range for fresh graduate with out any exams yet and after exam

This post has been edited by epplegaara: Jul 9 2009, 11:52 PM
cheecken0
post Feb 2 2010, 10:39 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
423 posts

Joined: Oct 2008
REVIVE DEAD THREAD

so lets say i am taking an engineering course. i am not required to have a degree but so long i pass the papers, it is as good as a qualification paper for my job application as an actuary?
mumeichan
post Feb 3 2010, 12:12 AM

Member
*******
Senior Member
4,152 posts

Joined: May 2005
QUOTE(cheecken0 @ Feb 2 2010, 10:39 PM)
REVIVE DEAD THREAD

so lets say i am taking an engineering course. i am not required to have a degree but so long i pass the papers, it is as good as a qualification paper for my job application as an actuary?
*
It really depends on the company and the actual job/position you're applying for.
solsekuin44
post Feb 3 2010, 06:18 PM

❤ Going Mirrorless ❤
*******
Senior Member
4,228 posts

Joined: Dec 2008
From: Klang


I learn something new rclxms.gif
ivon
post Mar 15 2010, 08:30 PM

New Member
*
Newbie
4 posts

Joined: Mar 2010


REVIVE DEAD RIVIVED DEAD THREAD

Actually I wanna ask more about scholarship matters....

I am an AUP student (currently in first sem), I wanna ask is it possible to get a handsome figure scholarship if i wanna admit into University of Wisconsin-Madison or University of Michigan, Ann Arbor? Cuz... I dont want to be trap in uni like Drake or Lincoln yet personally felt incapable of entering UPenn...
mumeichan
post Mar 15 2010, 09:54 PM

Member
*******
Senior Member
4,152 posts

Joined: May 2005
QUOTE(ivon @ Mar 15 2010, 08:30 PM)
REVIVE DEAD RIVIVED DEAD THREAD

Actually I wanna ask more about scholarship matters....

I am an AUP student (currently in first sem), I wanna ask is it possible to get a handsome figure scholarship if i wanna admit into University of Wisconsin-Madison or University of Michigan, Ann Arbor? Cuz... I dont want to be trap in uni like Drake or Lincoln yet personally felt incapable of entering UPenn...
*
No. Both are stingy universities. They don't have aid for foreign student unless you're extremely exceptional, which in such a case you wouldn't be doing ADP now.
ivon
post Mar 16 2010, 02:07 PM

New Member
*
Newbie
4 posts

Joined: Mar 2010


well, so, CGPA 4.0 wont help either isnt it....
mumeichan
post Mar 16 2010, 04:48 PM

Member
*******
Senior Member
4,152 posts

Joined: May 2005
QUOTE(ivon @ Mar 16 2010, 02:07 PM)
well, so, CGPA 4.0 wont help either isnt it....
*
No
9rac3
post Apr 2 2010, 04:25 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
9 posts

Joined: Apr 2010
i'm not sure if this thread stil continuing, or shld i start a new topic.. =)

ok, here it goes, i've read some comment, saying tat being an actuary doens really specifically require a degree in actuarial science, as long u have those actuarial professional cert / recognized paper with any related degree

so i have 2 questions here,

1. wat are the related degrees will you recommend which also allow you to become an actuary?
for ease to answer tis question, i'm interested in actuary is bcuz i like maths / calculation and quite good at it as compare to other subject (i know many ppl say liking maths alone is not enuf), i like solving problem (1 of the game i like is mastermind n sudoku), i'm strong in logical thinking, i like to think n analyze. on top of tat, salary ofcuz is my reason to this career but it doesn mean i wanna become millionaire, i just wanna have more stable financial as my current job is not stable.
reason to ask this question is bcuz i would prefer to have more general degree n yet is my favorite n capable in it


2. let say, u fail to become an actuary, where else can u go with these recommended degrees above (if u answer question above)?

to narrow down the answer, i will only take up courses in malaysia cuz i prefer working in malaysia n financial issue.. =)

thanks so much if u could help me by answering tis question! =)


gomes.
post Apr 2 2010, 06:50 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
361 posts

Joined: Dec 2006


QUOTE(9rac3 @ Apr 2 2010, 04:25 PM)
i'm not sure if this thread stil continuing, or shld i start a new topic.. =)

ok, here it goes, i've read some comment, saying tat being an actuary doens really specifically require a degree in actuarial science, as long u have those actuarial professional cert / recognized paper with any related degree

so i have 2 questions here,

1. wat are the related degrees will you recommend which also allow you to become an actuary?


maths, economics etc.. basically any subject with a "quantitative" background. engineering also..

QUOTE(9rac3 @ Apr 2 2010, 04:25 PM)
2. let say, u fail to become an actuary, where else can u go with these recommended degrees above (if u answer question above)?


economics -- work in the financial sector/bank etc.
maths -- work in the financial sector/bank, statistician, etc.. although with maths you might want to take some subjects in financial maths etc. search for terms like black-scholes, ito's lemma etc. to know more


Added on April 2, 2010, 6:51 pmwith maths degree, u can then specialise in financial maths (involves maths/calculations like actuarial science, but financial maths is more "pure maths" instead of statistics like actuarial science).
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mathematical_finance


Added on April 2, 2010, 6:51 pmyou might want to take a course like this below.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Master_of_Quantitative_Finance


Added on April 2, 2010, 6:53 pmif you have a masters degree in financial maths (see link above), you are very well placed to go into alot of areas in the financial sector (investment banking, banking, finance all these stuff etc.)


Added on April 2, 2010, 6:55 pmif you like stats, then maybe actuarial science would suit you. if you like more pure maths, financial maths would suit you more.

This post has been edited by gomes.: Apr 2 2010, 06:55 PM
tanjinjack
post Apr 2 2010, 07:12 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
4,122 posts

Joined: Jul 2008
From: Malaysia


QUOTE(9rac3 @ Apr 2 2010, 04:25 PM)
i'm not sure if this thread stil continuing, or shld i start a new topic.. =)

ok, here it goes, i've read some comment, saying tat being an actuary doens really specifically require a degree in actuarial science, as long u have those actuarial professional cert / recognized paper with any related degree

so i have 2 questions here,

1. wat are the related degrees will you recommend which also allow you to become an actuary?
for ease to answer tis question, i'm interested in actuary is bcuz i like maths / calculation and quite good at it as compare to other subject (i know many ppl say liking maths alone is not enuf), i like solving problem (1 of the game i like is mastermind n sudoku), i'm strong in logical thinking, i like to think n analyze. on top of tat, salary ofcuz is my reason to this career but it doesn mean i wanna become millionaire, i just wanna have more stable financial as my current job is not stable.
reason to ask this question is bcuz i would prefer to have more general degree n yet is my favorite n capable in it


2. let say, u fail to become an actuary, where else can u go with these recommended degrees above (if u answer question above)?

to narrow down the answer, i will only take up courses in malaysia cuz i prefer working in malaysia n financial issue.. =)

thanks so much if u could help me by answering tis question! =)
*
1. If you aim for actuary, sure do Actuarial Science la... But you can try other courses that are related, Mathematics should be most recommended. You can do Economics, Finance, Accounting etc. as well. But if you want to be actuary, why bother about other degree? (Follow to question 2)

2. It's not that you do a AS degree you are dead stuck in the actuarial industry. You can do a lot more things than that. There are a lot of graduates venturing into finance industry, and not many have actually tried to progress to become a better actuary (exams are tough, you know!!).
An AS degree gives you sharp strong analytical skills that are desired by a lot of fields, especially finance.
dubai_gal
post Apr 6 2010, 07:51 PM

New Member
*
Newbie
4 posts

Joined: Apr 2010
A view from overseas

As some of you will be aiming to work overseas, I thought I'd share my view with you. My background:

Uni degree: Property Management
Exams: 11 exams with UK Institute of Actuaries
Experience: New Zealand, Australia, Dubai (now)

I'd like to tell you my story because I am not your standard actuarial student. This is to prove that as long as you are interested to be an actuary and got the capabilities to be one, you can become one. As you can see from my background, I didn't study a "related" degree, I am no Maths whizz and I don't think I am going to be filthy rich any time soon.

I first heard of the word actuary when I started looking for a job, I studied for the exams at home when I joined an insurance company who would pay for my studies. I got tired of exams (after only passing 2!) and switched to an IT/ Marketing job for a couple of years, which somehow proved to be quite useful for me personally. I later got an actuarial post with a consultancy where they utilised a lot of my programming skills, in fact I think that is why they hired me in the first place. From there I continued my exams and made good progress. I have recently married and started up a new life in Dubai, working in a reinsurance company, STILL continuing my exams.

So the morale of the story, you don't get stucked once you go into the actuarial profession, you can switch to other professions you like. The actuarial profession is very wide and is not confined to insurance companies only, there is also investment, pension funds, health systems, government departments, even weather forecasts!! As to what qualification you need to have to sit the exams, I saw a 16 years old sitting the exam once (his dad is an actuary), so I'd say no special qualification needed.

Of course, this is my experience overseas, it may be a different story in Malaysia.

I would also like to add my two cents about the "good in Maths" part. To become a good actuary you have to be very market conscious, your technical pricing maybe 100% sound but it doesn't mean your product will sell. Judgement is very important, if not more important than your maths! My actuarial manager once told me if he copied the competitor's pricing, our product will sell better than pure technical pricing. I studied no maths in uni and now finding the applications paper in the later stage of the course easier, I was told some maths whizz struggles with the applications paper in the end while passing the technical papers without any problems.

Also, I would like to urge you to be prepared to give a significant portion of your life away for a good 6 years if not more. Especially for the females out there, think about how it is going to affect your prospects for marriage and having kids. I say this because I see a lot of girls' relationship suffer because of the lack of time for love, and sadly end up single (and deemed "unapproachable" by most guys) when they qualify.

Ok, I hope you are still awake and I have given you some useful info about working in the actuarial profession overseas. wink.gif


Added on April 6, 2010, 8:02 pmOne more point to make if you are in it for the money.........

In Dubai, my husband, a civil engineer, earns DDOOUUBBLLEE my salary. He just got his job this year too, so you may as well do engineering!

This post has been edited by dubai_gal: Apr 6 2010, 08:02 PM
9rac3
post Apr 7 2010, 12:12 AM

New Member
*
Junior Member
9 posts

Joined: Apr 2010
thanks for the info! by the way, what is the objective of all these exam? to become an certified actuary? since you said you were able to work in actuarial post with only 2 past exam
i'm kinda confused with those exam everyone is talking about, so i wanna know what exam is necessarily to be done? and what is it for? since some people able to work in actuarial post without taking all/some actuarial exam.

thanks for giving advice or info, where i'm confused yet, is interested.. thanks!


Added on April 7, 2010, 12:14 amohya, and where can we take those compulsory exam? if is needed..

This post has been edited by 9rac3: Apr 7 2010, 12:14 AM
dubai_gal
post Apr 7 2010, 04:10 PM

New Member
*
Newbie
4 posts

Joined: Apr 2010
You can work in the actuarial field without any exams, especially in places where accredited university actuarial courses are not available. A lot of companies hire statistics grad to fill actuarial position. Most companies will hire actuarial students who are determined to go through the whole exam system. However, you only advance to more senior roles after passing exams. Usually, you are stucked at manager level and cannot proceed to director level without being fully qualified.

As to the exam system, the UK system requires you to pass 15 papers to become fully qualified. The more exams you get, the more you will understand the work that you will be doing. You cannot learn all the technical knowledge by practising because too much technical knowledge will be assumed as people are given basic knowledge through the exams.

For info on the exams and how to sit the exams, visit this website
http://www.actuaries.org.uk/students

There are even some past year exams there you can look at if you want. Also bear in mind the syllabus can change over time, it used to be 9 exams 20 or so years ago, now it is 15.

You can find study guides for each exam here:
http://www.acted.co.uk/Html/paper_study_guide.htm

You also order materials from this site, if you reside in Malaysia you qualify for reduced rate fees and materials.

Please bear in mind that I am not working in Malaysia and I do not know how they hire over there. From experience, companies overseas hire whoever they think is suitable, just like some engineers will get into investment banking jobs.
mumeichan
post Apr 7 2010, 07:22 PM

Member
*******
Senior Member
4,152 posts

Joined: May 2005
QUOTE(dubai_gal @ Apr 7 2010, 04:10 PM)

You can work in the actuarial field without any exams, especially in places where accredited university actuarial courses are not available.  A lot of companies hire statistics grad to fill actuarial position.  Most companies will hire actuarial students who are determined to go through the whole exam system.  However, you only advance to more senior roles after passing exams.  Usually, you are stucked at manager level and cannot proceed to director level without being fully qualified.

*
There see, someone in the field has spoken. You can get a job without the papers. Please don't listen to the rubbish that an actuarial degree is a useless piece of paper.
beyond_99
post Apr 7 2010, 07:43 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,035 posts

Joined: Feb 2008
QUOTE(dubai_gal @ Apr 7 2010, 04:10 PM)
You can work in the actuarial field without any exams, especially in places where accredited university actuarial courses are not available.  A lot of companies hire statistics grad to fill actuarial position.  Most companies will hire actuarial students who are determined to go through the whole exam system.  However, you only advance to more senior roles after passing exams.  Usually, you are stucked at manager level and cannot proceed to director level without being fully qualified.

As to the exam system, the UK system requires you to pass 15 papers to become fully qualified.  The more exams you get, the more you will understand the work that you will be doing.  You cannot learn all the technical knowledge by practising because too much technical knowledge will be assumed as people are given basic knowledge through the exams.

For info on the exams and how to sit the exams, visit this website
http://www.actuaries.org.uk/students

There are even some past year exams there you can look at if you want.  Also bear in mind the syllabus can change over time, it used to be 9 exams 20 or so years ago, now it is 15.

You can find study guides for each exam here:
http://www.acted.co.uk/Html/paper_study_guide.htm

You also order materials from this site, if you reside in Malaysia you qualify for reduced rate fees and materials.

Please bear in mind that I am not working in Malaysia and I do not know how they hire over there.  From experience, companies overseas hire whoever they think is suitable, just like some engineers will get into investment banking jobs.
*
which uni u graduate from?uk?

QUOTE(mumeichan @ Apr 7 2010, 07:22 PM)
There see, someone in the field has spoken. You can get a job without the papers. Please don't listen to the rubbish that an actuarial degree is a useless piece of paper.
*
dubai_gal did mention she did actuarial job without actuarial degree or exam papers.However , actuarial degree can grant exam paper exemptions.

dubai_gal
post Apr 7 2010, 09:03 PM

New Member
*
Newbie
4 posts

Joined: Apr 2010
I graduated from the grand University of Auckland! LOL

I have no actuarial degree and no actuarial exams when I got my first actuarial job. In fact, when I graduated from uni I have not heard of actuaries before.

The message I am trying to get across is...
An actuarial degree do not guarantee you a job in the industry; and
No actuarial degree and no actuarial paper do not mean you won't get a job in the profession if you are truly interested in the field.

My understanding of the "accredited university actuarial papers" vs the "institute exams":

- there are 15 (UK) institute exams to pass before you become a fully qualified actuary. Other institutes have different number of exams.

- one or two university papers map to an institute exam, if you get good enough grades in the university papers, you get exemption from the institute. i.e. you passed that institute exam as well. Otherwise, you still have to sit the institute exam if all you have is borderline university paper pass. "Good enough grade" varies by university.

- you can sit the institute papers without any uni degree, all you have to do is enrol as a student with the institute and study by correspondence.

The best outcome from a university actuarial course is you get 10 exemptions (maybe higher for some UK unis). However, if you don't get any, you still have a better standing when you start the institute exams as you already have the background knowledge from your university course. There are people ordering books without any prior knowledge or maths like me and try to self learn the hard way.
beyond_99
post Apr 7 2010, 09:08 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,035 posts

Joined: Feb 2008
where do u sit the institute exam?

This post has been edited by beyond_99: Apr 8 2010, 10:25 AM
9rac3
post Apr 8 2010, 11:35 AM

New Member
*
Junior Member
9 posts

Joined: Apr 2010
good info! thanks! for my case, no harm taking a degree since i have no degree at all, atleast having a degree able to have more job opportunity (ofcuz i hope to work in actuarial post) but my age and financial might not allow as i need to give up my current job n study the degree..
i have question here, where can i enrol as a student, like wat beyond_99 asked, where to sit in the exam? honestly, i dunno where to start.. =/


Added on April 8, 2010, 11:35 amanyone know?

i know dubai_gal taking course in UK, so she might not know where to get in at m'sia..

This post has been edited by 9rac3: Apr 8 2010, 11:35 AM
dubai_gal
post Apr 8 2010, 12:59 PM

New Member
*
Newbie
4 posts

Joined: Apr 2010
You can enrol with the institute of actuaries UK and sit exams in Malaysia, for a list of exam centres, see http://www.actuaries.org.uk/students/exams...entres_overseas

Of course you may want to check out other options first.
jpysh2004
post Apr 16 2010, 01:09 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
10 posts

Joined: May 2006


I think you may have given people some misconception about actuarial science

1. I want to do Actuarial Science because I like Math.
This is the biggest misconception that people have about Actuarial Science. In actual fact, a good knowledge of Mathematics is necessary, but a great knowledge is not. In the UK, the first 8 professional papers are somewhat Maths-based, but the tougher papers at the end are all written papers, which require a good command of English, a good knowledge of the insurance industry and good critical thinking skills. Throughout my course, the most difficult branch of Maths we did was Calculus and Linear Algebra, and that is not saying much. When you do start working, you will realise that the only Math you need are mostly addition and subtraction. Computer Programming will be the most important skill you will ever need. And to all of those who says that they need Further Math in their A-Levels, I did Math, Economics and Law. If you like Math, do a Mathematics degree.

Yes! You may be true that when we start working, the only maths that is needed is addition and subtraction. However, why do you think that most people have to study so much mathematics just to take an actuarial science major? We have to know as well, passing those professional papers are not easy at all and it needs mathematics! Actuarial science major is more than mathematics as it involves economics, finance, computing, communication and others. That's how students are prepared for those harder examinations.

2. I want to do Actuarial Science because the pay is good.
True, we have one of the highest starting salaries in the business world. Not by much though. The thing is, a qualified actuary does earn a lot. But to get that qualification, one has to pass professional papers, and those are not easy by a mile. The average time it takes to pass all your papers in Malaysia is around 6 years, depending on how good you are. (Some do take more than 10 years) And truth be told, all other professions will be able to earn a satisfactory remuneration within 10 years. If you want the money, go into Investment Banking. In a magazine which I have read, in business, while all other financial workers are paying off their mortgage for their first house, Investment Bankers are buying their second home.

True that it's a good pay. However, the situation may not be as bad as u may have said. To earn a lot, we need qualification, which is by passing papers. However, if one were to be serious in actuarial science, he/she would have plan to take some papers when doing their degree. Serious students would on average pass about 4 papers(SOA/CAS) by the time they graduated with their actuarial degree. Hence, it may not take that many years to pass all the papers. Moreover, to be exact, it's not that you can only earn a lot by passing all the papers. In fact, for each paper that you passed, your salary will increase. Lets say you passed 4 papers(SOA/CAS) after 3 years you graduated. The pay is already vert high as compared to other degree holders are still working their way up in their career

3. I can pass all my professional exams if I work hard enough.
I want to believe this. I really do want to believe this. But with only 50 qualified actuaries in Malaysia, doesn’t it make you doubt that the only reason people are failing is because of a lack of effort? Studying is easy enough. Working is easy enough. Studying while working is not. While I was working in Malaysia, a colleague of mine works from 9 to 7 everyday, if he is lucky. On his way to and back from work, he studies on the LRT. If there is overtime, he will need to stay back and continue working. On weekends, he studies. At night, after being thoroughly exhausted at work, he studies. And while doing all these, he needs to find time for his girlfriend, family and friends. Now, ask yourself this: can you picture yourself doing that for a year? 3 years? 10 years?

I have to say i have to disagree with you. YES one can pass all professional papers if they work hard enough. For the actuarial field, if you are working for an actuarial company, you would usually be given study break if you were to take a professional exam. They would give you holidays so that you can study and prepare well for the papers. Therefore, the situation is not as bad as you said it is. You said that why is there only about 50 qualified actuary in Malaysia? This may not be because passing the papers are very hard. This may be because the actuarial field are not familiar to the society yet. The so-called qualified actuaries are those who passed all the papers. However, those who have passed a few papers are also actuary, just that they are not fully accredited.


I just want to clear out some misconception that TS may bring to you. In short, actuarial science is really a very rewarding career. If you like maths, do mathematics, like money, do investment banking. If you like both maths and money, do actuarial science. Moreover, an actuarial career is one of the best career because despite of its high demand, the workload is not as much. It is also ranked the best job in 2010.

Still, these is something that i have to agree with TS. Many people are taking actuarial science without first exploring what Actuarial science is all about. I have a friend who took physics in Matriculation took actuarial science for university just because many people are taking it. Many people even take actuarial science without knowing what actuarial science it, and that they have no idea about those professional papers. For them, it is just another degree that give you a lot of money once you graduated. This is the major misconception about actuarial science.



9rac3
post Apr 22 2010, 12:44 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
9 posts

Joined: Apr 2010
so jpysh2004, r u an actuarial student, or working in actuarial field?
danes007
post May 7 2010, 01:21 AM

New Member
*
Junior Member
47 posts

Joined: Mar 2010


QUOTE(jpysh2004 @ Apr 16 2010, 01:09 PM)
I think you may have given people some misconception about actuarial science

1. I want to do Actuarial Science because I like Math.
This is the biggest misconception that people have about Actuarial Science. In actual fact, a good knowledge of Mathematics is necessary, but a great knowledge is not. In the UK, the first 8 professional papers are somewhat Maths-based, but the tougher papers at the end are all written papers, which require a good command of English, a good knowledge of the insurance industry and good critical thinking skills. Throughout my course, the most difficult branch of Maths we did was Calculus and Linear Algebra, and that is not saying much. When you do start working, you will realise that the only Math you need are mostly addition and subtraction. Computer Programming will be the most important skill you will ever need. And to all of those who says that they need Further Math in their A-Levels, I did Math, Economics and Law. If you like Math, do a Mathematics degree.

Yes! You may be true that when we start working, the only maths that is needed is addition and subtraction. However, why do you think that most people have to study so much mathematics just to take an actuarial science major?  We have to know as well, passing those professional papers are not easy at all and it needs mathematics! Actuarial science major is more than mathematics as it involves economics, finance, computing, communication and others. That's how students are prepared for those harder examinations.

2. I want to do Actuarial Science because the pay is good.
True, we have one of the highest starting salaries in the business world. Not by much though. The thing is, a qualified actuary does earn a lot. But to get that qualification, one has to pass professional papers, and those are not easy by a mile. The average time it takes to pass all your papers in Malaysia is around 6 years, depending on how good you are. (Some do take more than 10 years) And truth be told, all other professions will be able to earn a satisfactory remuneration within 10 years. If you want the money, go into Investment Banking. In a magazine which I have read, in business, while all other financial workers are paying off their mortgage for their first house, Investment Bankers are buying their second home.

True that it's a good pay. However, the situation may not be as bad as u may have said. To earn a lot, we need qualification, which is by passing papers. However, if one were to be serious in actuarial science, he/she would have plan to take some papers when doing their degree. Serious students would on average pass about 4 papers(SOA/CAS) by the time they graduated with their actuarial degree. Hence, it may not take that many years to pass all the papers. Moreover, to be exact, it's not that you can only earn a lot by passing all the papers. In fact, for each paper that you passed, your salary will increase. Lets say you passed 4 papers(SOA/CAS) after 3 years you graduated. The pay is already vert high as compared to other degree holders are still working their way up in their career

3. I can pass all my professional exams if I work hard enough.
I want to believe this. I really do want to believe this. But with only 50 qualified actuaries in Malaysia, doesn’t it make you doubt that the only reason people are failing is because of a lack of effort? Studying is easy enough. Working is easy enough. Studying while working is not. While I was working in Malaysia, a colleague of mine works from 9 to 7 everyday, if he is lucky. On his way to and back from work, he studies on the LRT. If there is overtime, he will need to stay back and continue working. On weekends, he studies. At night, after being thoroughly exhausted at work, he studies. And while doing all these, he needs to find time for his girlfriend, family and friends. Now, ask yourself this: can you picture yourself doing that for a year? 3 years? 10 years?

I have to say i have to disagree with you. YES one can pass all professional papers if they work hard enough. For the actuarial field, if you are working for an actuarial company, you would usually be given study break if you were to take a professional exam. They would give you holidays so that you can study and prepare well for the papers. Therefore, the situation is not as bad as you said it is. You said that why is there only about 50 qualified actuary in Malaysia? This may not be because passing the papers are very hard. This may be because the actuarial field are not familiar to the society yet. The so-called qualified actuaries are those who passed all the papers. However, those who have passed a few papers are also actuary, just that they are not fully accredited.


I just want to clear out some misconception that TS may bring to you. In short, actuarial science is really a very rewarding career. If you like maths, do mathematics, like money, do investment banking. If you like both maths and money, do actuarial science. Moreover, an actuarial career is one of the best career because despite of its high demand, the workload is not as much. It is also ranked the best job in 2010.

Still, these is something that i have to agree with TS. Many people are taking actuarial science without first exploring what Actuarial science is all about. I have a friend who took physics in Matriculation took actuarial science for university just because many people are taking it. Many people even take actuarial science without knowing what actuarial science it, and that they have no idea about those professional papers. For them, it is just another degree that give you a lot of money once you graduated. This is the major misconception about actuarial science.
*
Thanks a lot jpysh2004... your informations are really helpful... Can i ask a few question on this topic? I'm actually interested in maths/add maths and problem solving... And i do like things about financial all... but i'm afraid my maths is just a basic level... i'm not a genius or whatever... but i have no interest in any other profession... i actually thought i would do fine in engineering fields because of the maths... And i am a IT science student... So, should i take on actuarial science or should i just do other mathematical field like financial analyst, investment banking, etc... And i do not quite like accounts... but i like economics... i'm really confused here... thanks for every piece of your opinion.


OnionII
post May 18 2010, 02:20 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
21 posts

Joined: Dec 2008
From: australia, malaysia


you can never get into a subject just because of maths cause even engineering is not all about maths. there's physics, chemistry and lab skills as well.
what type of maths do you love?
for actuarial studies, its a shitload of statistics and finance. not the mean, mode, median kind of statistics but the abstract kind of statistics (ie stochastic modelling) and finance kind of statistics (ie: financial maths, life contingencies...)
I HATED THEM ALL but i'm already graduating so... ya. how many person in the world actually reallyyyy love their job anyway?
gloomberg
post May 18 2010, 08:48 PM

On my way
****
Junior Member
510 posts

Joined: Aug 2009


Firstly, you have to understand that the demand for actuarial science grads in Malaysia had significantly due to the excessive supply. If you try to go out and look for jobs, you'll notice how scarce is it. But of course, I'm talking about vacancies in insurance(general/life/takaful) and consulting(life,general,health&benefits,pension&retirement). Other than that, feel free to search around. But what I am suggesting students who want to proceed with this career to actually major in statistics/computer programming/and any other majors(finance,economics,accounting). That way, you won't be stuck with only "real actuarial" job. Talking from experience here. Those newspaper article talking about the growing demand is utter bullshit, literally, especially the ex-ASM president who always go around promoting the non-existent demand. Mathematics is not crucial, but critical and analytical thinking is crucial in this line.
danes007
post May 19 2010, 04:07 AM

New Member
*
Junior Member
47 posts

Joined: Mar 2010


QUOTE(OnionII @ May 18 2010, 02:20 PM)
you can never get into a subject just because of maths cause even engineering is not all about maths. there's physics, chemistry and lab skills as well.
what type of maths do you love?
for actuarial studies, its a shitload of statistics and finance. not the mean, mode, median kind of statistics but the abstract kind of statistics (ie stochastic modelling) and finance kind of statistics (ie: financial maths, life contingencies...)
I HATED THEM ALL but i'm already graduating so... ya. how many person in the world actually reallyyyy love their job anyway?
*
Yes. It's true that maths alone would not be sufficient enough for any field but there are some fields that require more mathematical skill than others. I love the probability/mathematical reasoning/linear programming types of maths. I am actually interested in finance stuffs. Yea, i also heard about it. the stochastics modelling,black and scholes formula and people are telling that statistics are one of the worst things one could possibly studies. Most of the feedbacks i got about this course are negative one. That makes me rethink. And, i came up with another course, which is financial engineering. Currently offered at mmu only in Malaysia if i'm not mistaken. So, you are an actuarial science student? Can i knw where are you studying and how the whole course is from u're experience? thanks.


Added on May 19, 2010, 4:12 am
QUOTE(gloomberg @ May 18 2010, 08:48 PM)
Firstly, you have to understand that the demand for actuarial science grads in Malaysia had significantly due to the excessive supply. If you try to go out and look for jobs, you'll notice how scarce is it. But of course, I'm talking about vacancies in insurance(general/life/takaful) and consulting(life,general,health&benefits,pension&retirement). Other than that, feel free to search around. But what I am suggesting students who want to proceed with this career to actually major in statistics/computer programming/and any other majors(finance,economics,accounting). That way, you won't be stuck with only "real actuarial" job. Talking from experience here. Those newspaper article talking about the growing demand is utter bullshit, literally, especially the ex-ASM president who always go around promoting the non-existent demand. Mathematics is not crucial, but critical and analytical thinking is crucial in this line.
*
Thanks for your opinion. I thought of joining some company as a actuarial trainee. Is it possible? So, this majors, can we choose it? And, do every university gives us chance to major in specific field? what about the statistics? What do i need to do to be good at it? From the info that i got, it seems like actuarial science is a demanding career option since you can go for many type's of finance/economics related works besides being an actuarist. What do you think about financial engineering course?

This post has been edited by danes007: May 19 2010, 04:12 AM
gomes.
post May 19 2010, 08:24 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
361 posts

Joined: Dec 2006


QUOTE(danes007 @ May 19 2010, 04:07 AM)
Yes. It's true that maths alone would not be sufficient enough for any field but there are some fields that require more mathematical skill than others. I love the probability/mathematical reasoning/linear programming types of maths. I am actually interested in finance stuffs. Yea, i also heard about it. the stochastics modelling,black and scholes formula and people are telling that statistics are one of the worst things one could possibly studies. Most of the feedbacks i got about this course are negative one. That makes me rethink. And, i came up with another course, which is financial engineering. Currently offered at mmu only in Malaysia if i'm not mistaken. So, you are an actuarial science student? Can i knw where are you studying and how the whole course is from u're experience? thanks.


Added on May 19, 2010, 4:12 am
Thanks for your opinion. I thought of joining some company as a actuarial trainee. Is it possible? So, this majors, can we choose it? And, do every university gives us chance to major in specific field? what about the statistics? What do i need to do to be good at it? From the info that i got, it seems like actuarial science is a demanding career option since you can go for many type's of finance/economics related works besides being an actuarist. What do you think about financial engineering course?
*
Financial engineering is more of pure mathematics, such as analysis, differential equations, linear algebra (well you rely alot on those 3 areas), and probability. but NOT stats. (there is a difference between stats and probability)

basically financial engineering is mostly pure maths (analysis, differential equations, linear algebra), and some probaility (stochastic processes), but less of stats.

where as actuarial science is more of statistics.

personally its really up to you, but financial engineering IMO has better career prospects in the financial sector because its not so directed into actuarial/insurance stuff.

read this: about financial engineering (also called quantitative finance, etc.)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mathematical_Finance

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/It%C5%8D's_lemma
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black%E2%80%93Scholes

and most people do financial engineering/financial maths etc.. as a masters degree 1 year course, whereas actuarial science alot of people do it as a 3 years undergrad course.
OnionII
post May 19 2010, 08:12 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
21 posts

Joined: Dec 2008
From: australia, malaysia


QUOTE(danes007 @ May 19 2010, 04:07 AM)
Yes. It's true that maths alone would not be sufficient enough for any field but there are some fields that require more mathematical skill than others. I love the probability/mathematical reasoning/linear programming types of maths. I am actually interested in finance stuffs. Yea, i also heard about it. the stochastics modelling,black and scholes formula and people are telling that statistics are one of the worst things one could possibly studies. Most of the feedbacks i got about this course are negative one. That makes me rethink. And, i came up with another course, which is financial engineering. Currently offered at mmu only in Malaysia if i'm not mistaken. So, you are an actuarial science student? Can i knw where are you studying and how the whole course is from u're experience? thanks.
hello are you still in high school or are you a college student already?
im currently studying at the australian national university and... i would say its a pretty horrible experience for me cause i hate complicated and abstract stuffs...... and pretty much all the later year subjects are complicated and abstract. if i would've been given a second chance, i'll just go for accounting. actuarial's a little too ambitious for me :/
but still, its up to personal preference. i know people who loved it and does very well in it.
so ya, it isn't an easy course, but i guess with hardwork.. its doable. i guess. *inserts skepticism*

oh and im not very sure about financial engineering. it might be something similar to quantitative finance... which is rather close to actuarial, minus all the insurance focused subjects like life contingencies, actuarial techniques, survival model, risk theory bla bla. well thats what happen in my uni so im not sure if its the same in mmu!

This post has been edited by OnionII: May 19 2010, 08:14 PM
danes007
post May 20 2010, 11:53 AM

New Member
*
Junior Member
47 posts

Joined: Mar 2010


QUOTE(gomes. @ May 19 2010, 08:24 AM)
Financial engineering is more of pure mathematics, such as analysis, differential equations, linear algebra (well you rely alot on those 3 areas), and probability. but NOT stats. (there is a difference between stats and probability)

basically financial engineering is mostly pure maths (analysis, differential equations, linear algebra), and some probaility (stochastic processes), but less of stats.

where as actuarial science is more of statistics.

personally its really up to you, but financial engineering IMO has better career prospects in the financial sector because its not so directed into actuarial/insurance stuff.

read this: about financial engineering (also called quantitative finance, etc.)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mathematical_Finance

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/It%C5%8D's_lemma
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black%E2%80%93Scholes

and most people do financial engineering/financial maths etc.. as a masters degree 1 year course, whereas actuarial science alot of people do it as a 3 years undergrad course.
*
What are the job prospects available in financial engineering field and which one is most desirable in term of work,salaries, working hours, and demands. Does this kind of jobs depends on economical state of a country? does it means that it is not a very stable field and one might lose their job under economic crisis? If you compare financial jobs with engineering jobs, which one would you say better overall? I'm so confused here. rclxub.gif Thanks for your opinion.


Added on May 20, 2010, 11:55 am*economical status


Added on May 20, 2010, 1:13 pm
QUOTE(OnionII @ May 19 2010, 08:12 PM)
hello are you still in high school or are you a college student already?
im currently studying at the australian national university and... i would say its a pretty horrible experience for me cause i hate complicated and abstract stuffs...... and pretty much all the later year subjects are complicated and abstract. if i would've been given a second chance, i'll just go for accounting. actuarial's a little too ambitious for me :/
but still, its up to personal preference. i know people who loved it and does very well in it.
so ya, it isn't an easy course, but i guess with hardwork.. its doable. i guess. *inserts skepticism*

oh and im not very sure about financial engineering. it might be something similar to quantitative finance... which is rather close to actuarial, minus all the insurance focused subjects like life contingencies, actuarial techniques, survival model, risk theory bla bla. well thats what happen in my uni so im not sure if its the same in mmu!
*
I just finish my secondary school. Now, choosing the right college/uni to enter. Oh, so u're studying in Australia, what do you think about engineering field? If compared financial field and engineering field, which 1 would you suggest and why? How's an actuarist's job? Is it interesting? Or just spending the whole life in excel with statistics and all that? thanks.

This post has been edited by danes007: May 20 2010, 01:13 PM
OnionII
post May 20 2010, 07:59 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
21 posts

Joined: Dec 2008
From: australia, malaysia


QUOTE(danes007 @ May 20 2010, 11:53 AM)
What are the job prospects available in financial engineering field and which one is most desirable in term of work,salaries, working hours, and demands. Does this kind of jobs depends on economical state of a country? does it means that it is not a very stable field and one might lose their job under economic crisis? If you compare financial jobs with engineering jobs, which one would you say better overall? I'm so confused here.  rclxub.gif Thanks for your opinion.


Added on May 20, 2010, 1:13 pm
I just finish my secondary school. Now, choosing the right college/uni to enter. Oh, so u're studying in Australia, what do you think about engineering field? If compared financial field and engineering field, which 1 would you suggest and why? How's an actuarist's job? Is it interesting? Or just spending the whole life in excel with statistics and all that? thanks.
*
any job is risky (well, maybe not doctors) when theres an economic crisis.
and sorry i lost you there. your term 'engineering' refers to financial engineering or the mechanical/civil type of engineering? but anyway,
define interesting. cause some people find fishing interesting while alot don't. it depends on how much you like it seriously. i like shopping so i think a job as an actuary is damn boring. but if you work as a consultant actuary, you get to talk to clients, meet people, and stuffs like that. so that being said, its more interesting to work in the consultancy field!
btw, thought you should know that the word "actuarist" doesn't exist. a person who work in the acturial field is called an actuary. and the plural of it is "actuaries".

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Actuary

all the best for ur future undertakings!
danes007
post May 21 2010, 07:33 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
47 posts

Joined: Mar 2010


QUOTE(OnionII @ May 20 2010, 07:59 PM)
any job is risky (well, maybe not doctors) when theres an economic crisis.
and sorry i lost you there. your term 'engineering' refers to financial engineering or the mechanical/civil type of engineering? but anyway,
define interesting. cause some people find fishing interesting while alot don't. it depends on how much you like it seriously. i like shopping so i think a job as an actuary is damn boring. but if you work as a consultant actuary, you get to talk to clients, meet people, and stuffs like that. so that being said, its more interesting to work in the consultancy field!
btw, thought you should know that the word "actuarist" doesn't exist. a person who work in the acturial field is called an actuary. and the plural of it is "actuaries".

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Actuary

all the best for ur future undertakings!
*
Yea. Interesting for me would be like meeting people,travelling, solving problems, etc. What i mean by engineering is engineering degree such as chemical,aeronautics,petroleum, etc. But, one can't be a consultant right after graduate right? Frusted because of jpa result. Haaaaaizzzz... And. Sorry, my bad. Thanks for correcting me. happy.gif
gomes.
post May 21 2010, 08:45 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
361 posts

Joined: Dec 2006


QUOTE(danes007 @ May 20 2010, 11:53 AM)
What are the job prospects available in financial engineering field and which one is most desirable in term of work,salaries, working hours, and demands. Does this kind of jobs depends on economical state of a country? does it means that it is not a very stable field and one might lose their job under economic crisis? If you compare financial jobs with engineering jobs, which one would you say better overall? I'm so confused here.  rclxub.gif Thanks for your opinion.


Added on May 20, 2010, 11:55 am*economical status
You can go into investment banking, working in the financial sector etc..
http://www.campusrecruitment-tradingfloor....Business-Areas/
Just look under analyst, in general, you could go into those areas, i think..

Does this kind of jobs depends on economical state of a country? ---- most jobs do, but it doesnt necessarily mean you will lose your job when the country is in a bad economic state..

Really depends, if you do engineering, you either work like in a plant/factory, as the plant manager, or go into the sales division. with the sales division you need good interpersonal skills and stuff to suceed when talking to customers and clients etc.. but that generally has more potential than a plant manager and you can rise up higher to a high position etc..

personally its up to you. i had no interest in engineering (didnt like sciences at alevels), but i preferred maths and economics etc. so i chose to go the financial field (financial engineering etc. quant finance) pathway.


QUOTE(danes007 @ May 20 2010, 11:53 AM)

Added on May 20, 2010, 1:13 pm
I just finish my secondary school. Now, choosing the right college/uni to enter. Oh, so u're studying in Australia, what do you think about engineering field? If compared financial field and engineering field, which 1 would you suggest and why? How's an actuarist's job? Is it interesting? Or just spending the whole life in excel with statistics and all that? thanks.
*
What I did:

1. do alevels (at taylors/help/mckl etc..)
2. go to uk do 4 year degree like MORSE (warwick) http://www2.warwick.ac.uk/study/undergradu.../depta2z/morse/, or just a 3 years maths degree and then do a masters in financial maths (http://www2.lse.ac.uk/maths/Degrees/MSc_Financial_Mathematics.aspx)
3. you can start work in the financial field


With actuarist, some people dont find "spending the whole life in excel with statistics and all that" boring. smile.gif And personally, i dont think its that boring as the outside world portrays it, but it really depends on you. if you still are not sure, just spend some time working in an actuarial firm and find out if you like it or not.

personally, i dont really like stats, but i like puremaths. so thats why im doing financial engineering and not actuarial stuff.

oXide
post May 23 2010, 01:03 AM

New Member
*
Newbie
1 posts

Joined: May 2010

gomes,,,,,do you really studied at taylOrs before????

if yes,i am applying to pursue my degree in actuarial sc there..but,i am having shOrt in fund! cry.gif

plz...if you have any idea(like applying for a bank loan+signing a cOntract with them) on how to help with the fund,could you plz plz plz tell me... sad.gif

besides,how did you pay the fees while studying there?was it your persOnal fund or what?? wink.gif
xzjasonzx
post May 24 2010, 01:08 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
234 posts

Joined: Jun 2009
Just for curiosity, nowadays actuarial science sumhow became the dream course for everyone who are good in maths, it's like ''oh I got an A in maths, I want to be an actuary'' kind of thing. Will this be like a trend like the IT course 10 years or more ago whereby it suddenly became a popular course and end up there are less jobs compare to the graduates?

I'm asking this because I have seen and heard many people that scored an A+ in spm add maths tend to have the passion to be an actuary someday, is this a false sense that scoring in maths is enough to study actuarial science?

Is there such a high demand for actuary? If many people who are good in maths or even those who scored an A in exams go for actuarial science, would this amount way surpass the actual demand for it in the market?

I ask these questions because actuarial science has become a blooming course in the world where more and more universities provide such course. For parents in thier 40s or 50s, they didn't even heard of this course in the past, and by encouraging their children's dream alone without knowing the actual situation, would this lead to dissapointments or regrets later on?

This post has been edited by xzjasonzx: May 24 2010, 01:13 PM
RyukA
post May 24 2010, 10:46 PM

On my way
****
Senior Member
612 posts

Joined: Jan 2010


QUOTE(xzjasonzx @ May 24 2010, 01:08 PM)
Just for curiosity, nowadays actuarial science sumhow became the dream course for everyone who are good in maths, it's like ''oh I got an A in maths, I want to be an actuary'' kind of thing. Will this be like a trend like the IT course 10 years or more ago whereby it suddenly became a popular course and end up there are less jobs compare to the graduates?

I'm asking this because I have seen and heard many people that scored an A+ in spm add maths tend to have the passion to be an actuary someday, is this a false sense that scoring in maths is enough to study actuarial science?

Is there such a high demand for actuary? If many people who are good in maths or even those who scored an A in exams go for actuarial science, would this amount way surpass the actual demand for it in the market?

I ask these questions because actuarial science has become a blooming course in the world where more and more universities provide such course. For parents in thier 40s or 50s, they didn't even heard of this course in the past, and by encouraging their children's dream alone without knowing the actual situation, would this lead to dissapointments or regrets later on?
*
1. yes. It's a pretty big misconception.

2. Drop-out rate is quite high. Not because its hard or what. partly, yes, its kinda tough. partly, Math lovers seek their passion on math/ statistics degree. Took them quite some time to realise Actuarial is not their cup of tea.

3. Comparing Math ability:
mathematics degree > Engineering degree > Actuarial degree

4. Statistics is boring for most people. Especially Pure math lovers.

5. You need to chunk in Economics and Finance as well.

6. It may distort and surpass the market, but it will take hell long. 2/3 dies off at year 2. getting a degree and being qualified as an professional actuary is two different thing.

7. Not recommended if you hate sampling, reading and writing.

8. love financial math, understands pure math, explain applied math.
gomes.
post May 25 2010, 06:58 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
361 posts

Joined: Dec 2006


QUOTE(oXide @ May 23 2010, 01:03 AM)
gomes,,,,,do you really studied at taylOrs before????

if yes,i am applying to pursue my degree in actuarial sc there..but,i am having shOrt in fund! cry.gif

plz...if you have any idea(like applying for a bank loan+signing a cOntract with them) on how to help with the fund,could you plz plz plz tell me... sad.gif

besides,how did you pay the fees while studying there?was it your persOnal fund or what?? wink.gif
*
parents paid for my course, and im not doing the ADP actuarial science in taylors. erm, maybe scholarships, or just take a bank loan, or like mortgage loan.. i guess there might be other options, but im not sure.

QUOTE(xzjasonzx @ May 24 2010, 01:08 PM)
Just for curiosity, nowadays actuarial science sumhow became the dream course for everyone who are good in maths, it's like ''oh I got an A in maths, I want to be an actuary'' kind of thing. Will this be like a trend like the IT course 10 years or more ago whereby it suddenly became a popular course and end up there are less jobs compare to the graduates?

I'm asking this because I have seen and heard many people that scored an A+ in spm add maths tend to have the passion to be an actuary someday, is this a false sense that scoring in maths is enough to study actuarial science?


I think its somewhat different, because getting A1 for add maths/maths at SPM doesnt really mean you are THAT good in maths. if you are really really brilliant at maths, there is a good chance you will suceed in actuarial science/to become an actuary.

people may have got A for maths/add maths at SPm, and think they are good enough for actuarial science, but thats not the case, and thus leading them to dropping out/failing to qualify fully (the later papers are quite tough) as an actuarist.

you can still work in the bank/finance etc. and do non actuarial work if you have an actuarial science degree though, so thats somewhat a "fall back" plan.

QUOTE(xzjasonzx @ May 24 2010, 01:08 PM)

Is there such a high demand for actuary? If many people who are good in maths or even those who scored an A in exams go for actuarial science, would this amount way surpass the actual demand for it in the market?

I ask these questions because actuarial science has become a blooming course in the world where more and more universities provide such course. For parents in thier 40s or 50s, they didn't even heard of this course in the past, and by encouraging their children's dream alone without knowing the actual situation, would this lead to dissapointments or regrets later on?
*
if you are fully qualified as an actuarist, then you will be in demand.


gloomberg
post May 25 2010, 12:12 PM

On my way
****
Junior Member
510 posts

Joined: Aug 2009


ok guys, those who plan to take up an actuarial degree please dont study locally, as it would be hard to find an actuarial job in insurance firms(life,general,consulting). Demand is scarce, but supply is abundant. speaking from experience here ok. Last graduation along, there are >200 actuarial grads, and that doesn't include those coming from overseas. those who does not perform go to places doing underwriting, claims all those jobs u wont really wan to do. What is suggest is to take up a CFA course as a back up plan, although it's kinda expensive, and go for investment banks(i admit that it's not easy). only industry that has a bright future is takaful, although that would come a long way. So guys, have a back up plan before u start, dont just study for a particular course, it is kinda risky. Even when finding for a job, we have got to diversify, although specializing is good.
danes007
post May 25 2010, 05:28 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
47 posts

Joined: Mar 2010


QUOTE(gloomberg @ May 25 2010, 12:12 PM)
ok guys, those who plan to take up an actuarial degree please dont study locally, as it would be hard to find an actuarial job in insurance firms(life,general,consulting). Demand is scarce, but supply is abundant. speaking from experience here ok. Last graduation along, there are >200 actuarial grads, and that doesn't include those coming from overseas. those who does not perform go to places doing underwriting, claims all those jobs u wont really wan to do. What is suggest is to take up a CFA course as a back up plan, although it's kinda expensive, and go for investment banks(i admit that it's not easy). only industry that has a bright future is takaful, although that would come a long way. So guys, have a back up plan before u start, dont just study for a particular course, it is kinda risky. Even when finding for a job, we have got to diversify, although specializing is good.
*
If i take financial maths course, can i still go into investment banking? Is it possible for getting into investment banking? What is the job like at investment banking? salary? attractive or normal? work? interesting or stressful? what are the other better option? what kind of salary can i expect while joining as a trainee? thx.
LightningFist
post Jun 21 2010, 05:21 PM

Minion of the Damned
Group Icon
VIP
3,965 posts

Joined: Apr 2009
Hi, I am a CIE A Levels student.

I take Maths (with Pure Maths 1, Statistics 1, Pure Maths 3, Mechanics 1 - unfortunately not Statistics 2, or Further Maths) and Physics, Chemistry, Biology.

I would say Maths has always been my favourite of any subject at school. I certainly get the highest grades in it.

I would say that I have more interest in finance and investments than other things: Engineering, Medicine, Computer etc.

Is there anything I should consider before attempting to take up Actuarial Science?

I know I don't have Further Maths but I know that I don't require it specifically. No I am not a Pure Maths lover (although majority of Maths we have is Pure Maths) and I rather like Probability and Statistics. Like, not adore to death.

I have never had any interest in other career directions (I tried a Law Attachment, don't like Law).

I do get quite put off by all the bad things about different kinds of courses and careers.

The degree level statistics book does bother me a bit. But then, won't any degree book bother a pre-university student?

From what I have seen and read, is this true:
While it could be hard to get a job in the Insurance industry, I am not screwed if I took an Actuarial Science major degree right? Could I still get other work quite easily, with reasonably good financial rewards?

Exemptions from a few early exams are good, it seems the remainder are few. For example if for the UK one (don't know which), you get exempted from 8, then only 7 left? (Quite scary to think these 7 will take as long as 2/4-8/10 years?).

THANKS
mumeichan
post Jun 21 2010, 05:38 PM

Member
*******
Senior Member
4,152 posts

Joined: May 2005
QUOTE(LightningFist @ Jun 21 2010, 05:21 PM)
Hi, I am a CIE A Levels student.

I take Maths (with Pure Maths 1, Statistics 1, Pure Maths 3, Mechanics 1 - unfortunately not Statistics 2, or Further Maths) and Physics, Chemistry, Biology.

I would say Maths has always been my favourite of any subject at school. I certainly get the highest grades in it.

I would say that I have more interest in finance and investments than other things: Engineering, Medicine, Computer etc.

Is there anything I should consider before attempting to take up Actuarial Science?

I know I don't have Further Maths but I know that I don't require it specifically. No I am not a Pure Maths lover (although majority of Maths we have is Pure Maths) and I rather like Probability and Statistics. Like, not adore to death.

I have never had any interest in other career directions (I tried a Law Attachment, don't like Law).

I do get quite put off by all the bad things about different kinds of courses and careers.

The degree level statistics book does bother me a bit. But then, won't any degree book bother a pre-university student?

From what I have seen and read, is this true:
While it could be hard to get a job in the Insurance industry, I am not screwed if I took an Actuarial Science major degree right? Could I still get other work quite easily, with reasonably good financial rewards?

Exemptions from a few early exams are good, it seems the remainder are few. For example if for the UK one (don't know which), you get exempted from 8, then only 7 left? (Quite scary to think these 7 will take as long as 2/4-8/10 years?).

THANKS
*
Why didn't you take Further Maths?

jpysh2004
post Jun 22 2010, 09:20 AM

New Member
*
Junior Member
10 posts

Joined: May 2006


QUOTE(xzjasonzx @ May 24 2010, 01:08 PM)
Just for curiosity, nowadays actuarial science sumhow became the dream course for everyone who are good in maths, it's like ''oh I got an A in maths, I want to be an actuary'' kind of thing. Will this be like a trend like the IT course 10 years or more ago whereby it suddenly became a popular course and end up there are less jobs compare to the graduates?

I'm asking this because I have seen and heard many people that scored an A+ in spm add maths tend to have the passion to be an actuary someday, is this a false sense that scoring in maths is enough to study actuarial science?

Is there such a high demand for actuary? If many people who are good in maths or even those who scored an A in exams go for actuarial science, would this amount way surpass the actual demand for it in the market?

I ask these questions because actuarial science has become a blooming course in the world where more and more universities provide such course. For parents in thier 40s or 50s, they didn't even heard of this course in the past, and by encouraging their children's dream alone without knowing the actual situation, would this lead to dissapointments or regrets later on?
*
Sorry to say, but getting an A+ for SPM Add maths are just bullshits. the standard of SPM add maths are just too low...If you want to lever your maths skills, try some overseas mathematics exams (Australian Mathematics Competition, Olympia Competition), then only you judge your maths skills.

As mentioned before, there are a lot of dropouts for AS and AS grads will not necessary become actuaries(you need to pass professional paper to become one, just like how medical grads becoming a doctor and engineering grads becoming an engineer)



QUOTE(gloomberg @ May 25 2010, 12:12 PM)
ok guys, those who plan to take up an actuarial degree please dont study locally, as it would be hard to find an actuarial job in insurance firms(life,general,consulting). Demand is scarce, but supply is abundant. speaking from experience here ok. Last graduation along, there are >200 actuarial grads, and that doesn't include those coming from overseas. those who does not perform go to places doing underwriting, claims all those jobs u wont really wan to do. What is suggest is to take up a CFA course as a back up plan, although it's kinda expensive, and go for investment banks(i admit that it's not easy). only industry that has a bright future is takaful, although that would come a long way. So guys, have a back up plan before u start, dont just study for a particular course, it is kinda risky. Even when finding for a job, we have got to diversify, although specializing is good.
*
It doesn't really matters where you study. As long as you can pass those professional papers, you are just well to go just like those graduated overseas. The only problem is just that you cant take some of the exams locally, or perhaps most of them.

You kept saying demands is scarce and supply is abundant. Proofs? Perhaps you are speaking from your experience. However, statistically, your experience alone cannot represent the whole situation (i assume that you have taken statistic course?).

There is something that i kept saying "Getting an actuarial science degree doesn't mean you are an actuary".
You need to pass professional papers to be a credential actuary. Yes, there are 200+ actuarial science grads, but how many of them passed the papers? Demand for actuarial science grads may be low, but demand for actuary is definitely not! Why would a company want to pay higher salary for actuary who pass more papers? Simple supply and demand model, you judge from there. (check the average pay for actuary, not AS grads).



trapezohedron13
post Jun 22 2010, 09:45 AM

Enthusiast
*****
Junior Member
703 posts

Joined: Jun 2010
From: Kuala Lumpur
jpysh2004, are you in an actuarial field or background?
mumeichan
post Jun 22 2010, 10:28 AM

Member
*******
Senior Member
4,152 posts

Joined: May 2005
QUOTE(jpysh2004 @ Jun 22 2010, 09:20 AM)
You kept saying demands is scarce and supply is abundant. Proofs? Perhaps you are speaking from your experience. However, statistically, your experience alone cannot represent the whole situation (i assume that you have taken statistic course?).

*
Haih, let them say what they wanna say. In the end it's up to actuary wannabes to actually do some research on the job prospects so they can leave then wannabe stage and get on course to be someone really working in the risk management field. Anyone who has tried any actuarial papers and speak to people really working in this field know that there can't possibly be an over supply of actuaries, now and in the future.

Btw, decided where you wanna go already?
jpysh2004
post Jun 22 2010, 02:54 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
10 posts

Joined: May 2006


QUOTE(trapezohedron13 @ Jun 22 2010, 09:45 AM)
jpysh2004, are you in an actuarial field or background?
*
I am just an actuarial science student...haha...and I have done enough researches before i choose this major. Somehow, i find many information here are misleading.

QUOTE(mumeichan @ Jun 22 2010, 10:28 AM)
Haih, let them say what they wanna say. In the end it's up to actuary wannabes to actually do some research on the job prospects so they can leave then wannabe stage and get on course to be someone really working in the risk management field. Anyone who has tried any actuarial papers and speak to people really working in this field know that there can't possibly be an over supply of actuaries, now and in the future.

Btw, decided where you wanna go already?
*
Lol...you know me? I supposed you studied in INTI before, heading to University of Wisconsin-Madison this fall
trapezohedron13
post Jun 22 2010, 03:43 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Junior Member
703 posts

Joined: Jun 2010
From: Kuala Lumpur
QUOTE(jpysh2004 @ Jun 22 2010, 02:54 PM)
I am just an actuarial science student...haha...and I have done enough researches before i choose this major. Somehow, i find many information here are misleading.
*
You are right. I did not go through every single post but from the last few, i noticed that the main fuss is the mathematics part and career prospect.

Actuarial mathematics is beautiful.
gary12345
post Aug 6 2010, 07:42 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
95 posts

Joined: Aug 2010
Thank you monkeyseemonkeydo for posting these informations !
I love acturial science !
I'm just form 4 this year ...
I would like to do acturial science in future because i like Math which you've mentioned for the first one .
Well , after i read this post ...
I actually got scared ...
haha ...

But my main target is to get " high salary " in future as i'm spending a lot of money now ... ( approximately 3k per month ) ...
hahah
what should i do ???
Can you give me some advice ?
Thank you !

This post has been edited by gary12345: Aug 6 2010, 01:43 PM
jilshi
post Aug 6 2010, 03:06 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
129 posts

Joined: Jun 2010


interesting topic
rubrubrub
post Aug 6 2010, 04:06 PM

senor
******
Senior Member
1,793 posts

Joined: Oct 2008
From: UC Berkeley


wow thank you. luckily i went for psych and management.


Added on August 6, 2010, 4:08 pm
QUOTE(gary12345 @ Aug 6 2010, 07:42 AM)
Thank you monkeyseemonkeydo for posting these informations !
I love acturial science !
I'm just form 4 this year ...
I would like to do acturial science in future because i like Math which you've mentioned for the first one .
Well , after i read this post ...
I actually got scared ...
haha ...

But my main target is to get " high salary " in future as i'm spending a lot of money now ... ( approximately 3k per month ) ...
hahah
what should i do ???
Can you give me some advice ?
Thank you !
*
lol ur going to suffer. mark my word.

This post has been edited by rubrubrub: Aug 6 2010, 04:08 PM
Balaclava
post Aug 6 2010, 04:23 PM

5-Star Swagger
*****
Senior Member
941 posts

Joined: Jul 2010
math is not the only problem for actuarist. The few final professional papers are actually based on critical analysis skills. it requires students to handle situations based on real life events and maths isn't going to help much(think of writing an essay). I know this because my gf's sister is done actuary and she's taking up CFA at the moment because she don't want to stress herself with the final few papers.
trapezohedron13
post Aug 6 2010, 11:42 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Junior Member
703 posts

Joined: Jun 2010
From: Kuala Lumpur
QUOTE(gary12345 @ Aug 6 2010, 07:42 AM)
Thank you monkeyseemonkeydo for posting these informations !
I love acturial science !
I'm just form 4 this year ...
I would like to do acturial science in future because i like Math which you've mentioned for the first one .
Well , after i read this post ...
I actually got scared ...
haha ...

But my main target is to get " high salary " in future as i'm spending a lot of money now ... ( approximately 3k per month ) ...
hahah
what should i do ???
Can you give me some advice ?
Thank you !
*
If you like math, do a degree in Math or Engineering or Physics.

Salary-wise, it's the same as any other graduates. The only difference is the external examinations. And the good news? You can take it even if you're doing Domestic Science. My advice is to finish your SPM first, and think about it later. An actuary does not deal with much mathematics when they're working. Only if you're research-inclined that you'd use more maths.
RyukA
post Aug 9 2010, 06:18 AM

On my way
****
Senior Member
612 posts

Joined: Jan 2010


QUOTE(gary12345 @ Aug 6 2010, 07:42 AM)
Thank you monkeyseemonkeydo for posting these informations !
I love acturial science !
I'm just form 4 this year ...
I would like to do acturial science in future because i like Math which you've mentioned for the first one .
Well , after i read this post ...
I actually got scared ...
haha ...

But my main target is to get " high salary " in future as i'm spending a lot of money now ... ( approximately 3k per month ) ...
hahah
what should i do ???
Can you give me some advice ?
Thank you !
*
Nowadays, math is just in anything.
It kinda give me the lol's when I read back education posts regarding actuarial studies.

Let me tell ya,
MATH IS IN EVERYTHING.

u really have to understand, what type of math do you like. "dont ask for the types, google it = ="
If you only like 1 or 2 type( lets say... basic algaebra and complex numbers? ) . Actuarial science is not ur cup of tea.
If you would like to undergo an actuarial degree, be prepared to study everything.
I am not quite sure how uni's in other country works, but in Aus,
an actuarial degree will comprise of units from Finance, Economics, Business basics, some corporate Laws and
the worst STATISTIC ever.
My entire course plan just comprise of 1 compulsory Math unit, which is during 1st sem for later statistics prerequisites.

You would note, you would have to develope individual study skills for every individual type of subject, obviously the way u study
Finance cannot be the way how u study Law. This is the exposure the degree wants to provide, in fact apart from "having interest", you have
to create interest.

An actuary mostly goes tightly with risk management, estimation of life contingencies, and doing evaluation of premiums.
the fact that it covers almost anything from the commercial, insurance, financial field, you need to have substantial knowledge form every sector.
This is also why I find this course interesting, as u get to study "everything".

Everyone wants to get a high salary. Any professional jobs CAN give u a high salary job as well. Ermm.. medic? Engineer? Lawyer? Auditor? But they dont just come, you need to work for the top of it.

Enough scaring + truths,
YOU DECIDE. lol


gary12345
post Aug 9 2010, 07:41 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
95 posts

Joined: Aug 2010
Well guys ...
I'm a bit confused now ~_~
Can you guys give me some advice please ?
What should I do now ?
I'm having spm next year ~
I'm in Form 4 Commerce Stream ( Accounts , Business , Economic and Art , taking + Math as well )
Thank you .
Searingmage
post Aug 9 2010, 09:17 AM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,809 posts

Joined: Feb 2010


QUOTE(gary12345 @ Aug 9 2010, 07:41 AM)
Well guys ...
I'm a bit confused now ~_~
Can you guys give me some advice please ?
What should I do now ?
I'm having spm next year ~
I'm in Form 4 Commerce Stream ( Accounts , Business , Economic and Art , taking + Math as well )
Thank you .
*
For now, just study hard and do well. Don't think so much about what to do next. You have all the time in the world to do so after your SPM. At least, then, you may know which subject is to your interest.
mumeichan
post Aug 9 2010, 01:10 PM

Member
*******
Senior Member
4,152 posts

Joined: May 2005
QUOTE(gary12345 @ Aug 9 2010, 07:41 AM)
Well guys ...
I'm a bit confused now ~_~
Can you guys give me some advice please ?
What should I do now ?
I'm having spm next year ~
I'm in Form 4 Commerce Stream ( Accounts , Business , Economic and Art , taking + Math as well )
Thank you .
*
Where's the Add Math? Actuarial science is all about math. Actuarial science is applying math to make future decisions based on date collected in the past. Whether accounts, hr, economics and all is essential to become a successful corporate executive or not is a different story. Actuarial math is the quantitative part of businesses and that means math, math and more math. All my actuarial subjects are either pure math subjects or applied math with alot of probability. Accounts has really nothing to do with the actuarial field. Economics and Finance are related and the related parts are mostly quantitative too, in other words, applying more complicated math. That Perdagangan subject is just a bunch of useless business term. All my actuarial exams are all math too (SOA here). Wanna disagree? Don't bother, just take the exams and see for yourselves, in fact you can download sample papers online. You wanna believe people who haven't studied for the actuarial exams you and answer based on hearsay, well that's your choice not to research properly and you're in for a big shock during your studies.
gary12345
post Aug 9 2010, 01:47 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
95 posts

Joined: Aug 2010
QUOTE(mumeichan @ Aug 9 2010, 01:10 PM)
Where's the Add Math? Actuarial science is all about math. Actuarial science is applying math to make future decisions based on date collected in the past. Whether accounts, hr, economics and all is essential to become a successful corporate executive or not is a different story. Actuarial math is the quantitative part of businesses and that means math, math and more math. All my actuarial subjects are either pure math subjects or applied math with alot of probability. Accounts has really nothing to do with the actuarial field. Economics and Finance are related and the related parts are mostly quantitative too, in other words, applying more complicated math. That Perdagangan subject is just a bunch of useless business term. All my actuarial exams are all math too (SOA here). Wanna disagree? Don't bother, just take the exams and see for yourselves, in fact you can download sample papers online. You wanna believe people who haven't studied for the actuarial exams you and answer based on hearsay, well that's your choice not to research properly and you're in for a big shock during your studies.
*
Er thanks for the advises ~
I'm confused again of which actuarial are you talking about ? A.Science or A.Math ?
And , why did you say that " Perdagangan subject is just a bunch of useless business term " ?
mumeichan
post Aug 9 2010, 02:47 PM

Member
*******
Senior Member
4,152 posts

Joined: May 2005
QUOTE(gary12345 @ Aug 9 2010, 01:47 PM)
Er thanks for the advises ~
I'm confused again of which actuarial are you talking about ? A.Science or A.Math ?
And , why did you say that "  Perdagangan subject is just a bunch of useless business term " ?
*
I'm talking about the need to take add maths so that you have the basics for differentiation, integration and trigonometry. It helps alot to study it slowly for two years and making your foundation rock solid before you take actuarial science in college. And I say that " Perdagangan subject is just a bunch of useless business terms" because I took the paper and that's really what it is.
trapezohedron13
post Aug 9 2010, 06:37 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Junior Member
703 posts

Joined: Jun 2010
From: Kuala Lumpur
QUOTE(mumeichan @ Aug 9 2010, 01:10 PM)
Accounts has really nothing to do with the actuarial field. Economics and Finance are related and the related parts are mostly quantitative too, in other words, applying more complicated math.
*
Oh no, accounting has got to do with the actuarial field. You're under the SOA? Seriously, the math we're dealing with is nothing compared to those physics and engineering students are doing. Actuarial science deals with the qualitative part of economics and finance too. Since you're in SOA, you should be aware of the Economics and Corporate Finance credit.

And add maths is essential for pre-U mathematics. If you can't do well in add math, then consider doing other less math-intensive course.

mumeichan
post Aug 9 2010, 08:01 PM

Member
*******
Senior Member
4,152 posts

Joined: May 2005
QUOTE(trapezohedron13 @ Aug 9 2010, 06:37 PM)
Oh no, accounting has got to do with the actuarial field. You're under the SOA? Seriously, the math we're dealing with is nothing compared to those physics and engineering students are doing. Actuarial science deals with the qualitative part of economics and finance too. Since you're in SOA, you should be aware of the Economics and Corporate Finance credit.

And add maths is essential for pre-U mathematics. If you can't do well in add math, then consider doing other less math-intensive course.
*
I'm aware of the Economics and Finance credit which can be fulfilled by relatively easy or introductory course. A-Levels Econs is already enough of the Economics VEE. The most basic Finance course in my former uni fufills the Coporate Finance VEE. Accounts has absolutely nothing to do with the actuarial field. And the math I'm dealing with is a tough as as what the Engineering students do. I don't know about physics. Well the Malaysian students in my former uni were either doing actuarial science or engineering, so I do know at least that much.

Searingmage
post Aug 9 2010, 09:21 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,809 posts

Joined: Feb 2010


QUOTE(mumeichan @ Aug 9 2010, 08:01 PM)
I'm aware of the Economics and Finance credit which can be fulfilled by relatively easy or introductory course. A-Levels Econs is already enough of the Economics VEE. The most basic Finance course in my former uni fufills the Coporate Finance VEE. Accounts has absolutely nothing to do with the actuarial field. And the math I'm dealing with is a tough as as what the Engineering students do. I don't know about physics. Well the Malaysian students in my former uni were either doing actuarial science or engineering, so I do know at least that much.
*
If actuary dun noe accounts, how are they able to project future financial statements of an insurance company? While you don't need as deep level of accounting skills as an accountant, you still need to know accounts. In fact, the accountants in insurance company may even need to consult actuaries on certain part of the accounts, since insurance company use a lot of assumptions.

This post has been edited by Searingmage: Aug 9 2010, 09:24 PM
mumeichan
post Aug 9 2010, 09:39 PM

Member
*******
Senior Member
4,152 posts

Joined: May 2005
QUOTE(Searingmage @ Aug 9 2010, 09:21 PM)
If actuary dun noe accounts, how are they able to project future financial statements of an insurance company? While you don't need as deep level of accounting skills as an accountant, you still need to know accounts. In fact, the accountants in insurance company may even need to consult actuaries on certain part of the accounts, since insurance company use a lot of assumptions.
*
Do you know what accounting is?

ps: Anyway, I'm not interested in trying to convince anyone any further that accounting is nor part of the actuarial field. Not trying to be lanci, just that I've done my part to summarize what I've learned so far since I'm doing an actuarial degree myself. To anyone who is interested in going into this field as well, it's you can either do more research beforehand or discover it sooner or later during your studies.

This post has been edited by mumeichan: Aug 9 2010, 09:49 PM
Searingmage
post Aug 9 2010, 10:14 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,809 posts

Joined: Feb 2010


QUOTE(mumeichan @ Aug 9 2010, 09:39 PM)
Do you know what accounting is?

ps: Anyway, I'm not interested in trying to convince anyone any further that accounting is nor part of the actuarial field. Not trying to be lanci, just that I've done my part to summarize what I've learned so far since I'm doing an actuarial degree myself. To anyone who is interested in going into this field as well, it's you can either do more research beforehand or discover it sooner or later during your studies.
*
May I ask if you have already graduated or not? If not, which year are you in? Also, how many external papers have you taken? Btw, ain't financial statements etc a subset of accounting? If actuaries need to even tell accountants certain elements in a balance sheet / income statement, how can they not know accounts?
This is not really convincing or anything, by clarifying this, those who read the post will have more idea on what actuarial science is.
RyukA
post Aug 9 2010, 10:57 PM

On my way
****
Senior Member
612 posts

Joined: Jan 2010


QUOTE(mumeichan @ Aug 9 2010, 09:39 PM)
Do you know what accounting is?

ps: Anyway, I'm not interested in trying to convince anyone any further that accounting is nor part of the actuarial field. Not trying to be lanci, just that I've done my part to summarize what I've learned so far since I'm doing an actuarial degree myself. To anyone who is interested in going into this field as well, it's you can either do more research beforehand or discover it sooner or later during your studies.
*
well. guys. Looking through all these, I am stuck in both. lol I am doing a double degree on Bachelor of Actuarial Studies/Bachelor of Commerce ( Professional accouting). I would like to say, you may argue that Actuary job is very distinct/different from accountancy. But, throughout my study, I can tell u confidently that there is somehow interception between the two. Besides, it relates to economics and finance as well. I believe SoA is not much different from IAA( Institute of Actuaries Australia),
there will be certain core technical paper that is mainly about Financial Reporting, Financial Math and Corporate finance. Apart from modelling, it is important for an actuarial student to have good background knowledge
about basic accountancy (analysing Financial statement etc). Since both exist in the commerce field, there will always be a little similarity. An accountant will be at an advantage if you can master some financial mathematics, or have the ability to do some data sampling. An actuary will be at an advantage, if you know how the accounting process goes, hence able to provide solutions through analytical skills.

After-all, you may end up working as an actuary for gov. statistics, accounting firms or insurance firms. Or one may be an accountant working in an actuarial firm. To progress further, may need these knowledge if you are about to take up big positions in a firm. the ultimate fact is that Accountancy is more just than book keeping. ( u do taxations, simple auditing, learn entity laws, management accounting much more)
jpysh2004
post Aug 9 2010, 10:59 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
10 posts

Joined: May 2006


QUOTE(Searingmage @ Aug 9 2010, 09:21 PM)
If actuary dun noe accounts, how are they able to project future financial statements of an insurance company? While you don't need as deep level of accounting skills as an accountant, you still need to know accounts. In fact, the accountants in insurance company may even need to consult actuaries on certain part of the accounts, since insurance company use a lot of assumptions.
*
Well, accounting isn't really part of actuarial science, even though we learn accounting in our classes. About projecting future financial statements, even of an insurance company, it's the accountant's job, not the actuary, actuary working for insurance company dont really involve in the accounting. As i say, in an insurance company. Why would an insurance company hire an actuary to do accounts anyway. Actuary expertise in risk analysis, which in an insurance company, is used to earn money, not to keep record of the money.

And about accounting, it's more than just book keeping. It involves also budgeting, financial analysis, giving advice on the company's financial status and many more.

True that insurance company use a lot of assumptions, but it's mathematical based assumptions. Actuary judge based on their mathematical or rish analysis. Meanwhile, accountants judge based on their financial analysis.

Actuary and Accountants are actually two different thing overall. Actuaries are the ones who help the company to earn money, by managing risk or in an insurance company, decide on insurance policies, so that they company will earn money. Meanwhile, accountants are the ones who keep track of the company's earning and expenses, and advice the company on their financial status, hence advising them about their budgets.


QUOTE(Searingmage @ Aug 9 2010, 10:14 PM)
May I ask if you have already graduated or not? If not, which year are you in? Also, how many external papers have you taken? Btw, ain't financial statements etc a subset of accounting? If actuaries need to even tell accountants certain elements in a balance sheet / income statement, how can they not know accounts?
This is not really convincing or anything, by clarifying this, those who read the post will have more idea on what actuarial science is.
*
Sometimes, it doesnt matter whether someone graduated already or not. How well a person knows about a topic depends how deeps the person did research on that topic, not really on how how long the person are directly involved in the field. One simple example, a person who teaches physics in university for 10 years and a person who did research on physics on perhaps 5 years? Who do you think know better physics? A more appropriate example, a person who have 10 years experience in raising animals as compared to a person who spent only 5 years in researching on how to raise animals. Who knows better about raising animals?

True that a person who involves in that field have more experience, but doesnt means he knows more about the field as compared to someone who did research on that field.

mumeichan
post Aug 9 2010, 11:54 PM

Member
*******
Senior Member
4,152 posts

Joined: May 2005
QUOTE(Searingmage @ Aug 9 2010, 10:14 PM)
May I ask if you have already graduated or not? If not, which year are you in? Also, how many external papers have you taken? Btw, ain't financial statements etc a subset of accounting? If actuaries need to even tell accountants certain elements in a balance sheet / income statement, how can they not know accounts?
This is not really convincing or anything, by clarifying this, those who read the post will have more idea on what actuarial science is.
*
I've not graduated and I'm only preparing for my first paper. But I've already gone through the detail syllabus of all my subjects and also the actuarial papers. My friends have all passed at least two papers and the seniors have passed 4. Some are even working as full time employees in consultancy firms already. And also, even if I didn't know all these people, that actuarial doesn't involve accounting is a simple fact that can be easily reasoned if one knows what actuarial and accountancy means.

QUOTE(RyukA @ Aug 9 2010, 10:57 PM)
well. guys. Looking through all these, I am stuck in both. lol  I am doing a double degree on Bachelor of Actuarial Studies/Bachelor of Commerce ( Professional accouting). I would like to say, you may argue that Actuary job is very distinct/different from accountancy. But, throughout my study, I can tell u confidently that there is somehow interception between the two. Besides, it relates to economics and finance as well. I believe SoA is not much different from IAA( Institute of Actuaries Australia),
there will be certain core technical paper that is mainly about Financial Reporting, Financial Math and Corporate finance. Apart from modelling, it is important for an actuarial student to have good background knowledge
about basic accountancy (analysing Financial statement etc). Since both exist in the commerce field,  there will always be a little similarity. An accountant will be at an advantage if you can master some financial mathematics, or have the ability to do some data sampling. An actuary will be at an advantage, if you know how the accounting process goes, hence able to provide solutions through analytical skills.

After-all, you may end up working as an actuary for gov. statistics, accounting firms or insurance firms. Or one may be an accountant working in an actuarial firm. To progress further, may need these knowledge if you are about to take up big positions in a firm. the ultimate fact is that Accountancy is more just than book keeping. ( u do taxations, simple auditing, learn entity laws, management accounting much more)
*
There is certainly a paper on Financial Math and Coporate Finance but there is no paper on financial reporting because that's not what actuaries do. Actuaries don't analyze financial statements, accountants do that. Accountants don't do date sampling that's not their job and it won't benefit them to study high level mathematics. Accounts maintain the flow of business through the records of all transactions that happen in a company. It's doesn't involve alot of math(the hardest is areas and gradients of simple graphs) and all calculations are done using computers.

An actuary doesn't analyze financial statements. All the financial terms he'll ever need to know to use in the mathematical models and method of analysis he has learned is though within his actuarial subjects. There is no need to even take the most basic accounting course to figure that out.

The most basic job description I can give about an actuary is that they count that 10% of the policy holders are going to get into an accident and if the company need at least 1 million to pay them all of or else they are screwed. Or he might calculate that the value of a property is set to raise at 3% per annum. Or that 15% of Malaysia like Coke Pepsi and 7UP only. It hardly matters if the company doesn't even have accounts. The accountant on the other hand analyzes where the cash is coming from, which ares are giving problem, which areas have delays, where payments are going, is there excessive wastage somewhere, what should be declared as what for taxation, what are potential assets and liabilities which are so apparent, managing the value of assets and liabilities and so on. And at the end of the day the managers and directors make the calls. It's not the actuaries problem if they decide to prepare just 9 million for claims and take the risk, it's not the actuaries concern if they decide to screw the account to evade taxes, it's not the actuaries concern if they decide to label an appraising piece of land as a liability.

This post has been edited by mumeichan: Aug 10 2010, 12:03 AM
Searingmage
post Aug 10 2010, 09:17 AM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,809 posts

Joined: Feb 2010


QUOTE(jpysh2004 @ Aug 9 2010, 10:59 PM)
Well, accounting isn't really part of actuarial science, even though we learn accounting in our classes. About projecting future financial statements, even of an insurance company, it's the accountant's job, not the actuary, actuary working for insurance company dont really involve in the accounting. As i say, in an insurance company. Why would an insurance company hire an actuary to do accounts anyway. Actuary expertise in risk analysis, which in an insurance company, is used to earn money, not to keep record of the money.

And about accounting, it's more than just book keeping. It involves also budgeting, financial analysis, giving advice on the company's financial status and many more.

True that insurance company use a lot of assumptions, but it's mathematical based assumptions. Actuary judge based on their mathematical or rish analysis. Meanwhile, accountants judge based on their financial analysis.

Actuary and Accountants are actually two different thing overall. Actuaries are the ones who help the company to earn money, by managing risk or in an insurance company, decide on insurance policies, so that they company will earn money. Meanwhile, accountants are the ones who keep track of the company's earning and expenses, and advice the company on their financial status, hence advising them about their budgets.
Sometimes, it doesnt matter whether someone graduated already or not. How well a person knows about a topic depends how deeps the person did research on that topic, not really on how how long the person are directly involved in the field. One simple example, a person who teaches physics in university for 10 years and a person who did research on physics on perhaps 5 years? Who do you think know better physics? A more appropriate example, a person who have 10 years experience in raising animals as compared to a person who spent only 5 years in researching on how to raise animals. Who knows better about raising animals?

True that a person who involves in that field have more experience, but doesnt means he knows more about the field as compared to someone who did research on that field.
*
I thought projecting future financial statement is one of actuary valuable skills. I did not say actuary are the one doing accounts, I am merely saying, actuary will project all future possible outcome. Well, at least, my lecturer who had been in the industry told me about this. And also, if they do not know how to read those book keeping, how are they suppose to know if they are doing well? One of the method of input validation is reconciliation with accounting, no? So, they need, however minimal, some accounting knowledge.
Also, a person graduated or not means a lot. Because, one has entered the industry while another hasn't. So, one will know what the industry actually is while the other merely heard a third party saying. I am the latter but my source is from my lecturer who had been in the industry. As I mention, while actuary don't need to personally do the accounts, actuary need to know accounts. Because sometimes accountants will need to consult actuary on certain elements of the financial statements. In fact, in accounting itself, there's a part on actuarial basis of accounting.
On your red herring regarding raising animals, I would've to say the 10 years guy will be able to raise animal better, the other only have paper knowledge and don't have hands on experience.


Added on August 10, 2010, 9:27 am
QUOTE(mumeichan @ Aug 9 2010, 11:54 PM)
I've not graduated and I'm only preparing for my first paper. But I've already gone through the detail syllabus of all my subjects and also the actuarial papers. My friends have all passed at least two papers and the seniors have passed 4. Some are even working as full time employees in consultancy firms already. And also, even if I didn't know all these people, that actuarial doesn't involve accounting is a simple fact that can be easily reasoned if one knows what actuarial and accountancy means.
There is certainly a paper on Financial Math and Coporate Finance but there is no paper on financial reporting because that's not what actuaries do. Actuaries don't analyze financial statements, accountants do that. Accountants don't do date sampling that's not their job and it won't benefit them to study high level mathematics. Accounts maintain the flow of business through the records of all transactions that happen in a company. It's doesn't involve alot of math(the hardest is areas and gradients of simple graphs) and all calculations are done using computers.

An actuary doesn't analyze financial statements. All the financial terms he'll ever need to know to use in the mathematical models and method of analysis he has learned is though within his actuarial subjects. There is no need to even take the most basic accounting course to figure that out.

The most basic job description I can give about an actuary is that they count that 10% of the policy holders are going to get into an accident and if the company need at least 1 million to pay them all of or else they are screwed. Or he might calculate that the value of a property is set to raise at 3% per annum. Or that 15% of Malaysia like Coke Pepsi and 7UP only. It hardly matters if the company doesn't even have accounts. The accountant on the other hand analyzes where the cash is coming from, which ares are giving problem, which areas have delays, where payments are going, is there excessive wastage somewhere, what should be declared as what for taxation, what are potential assets and liabilities which are so apparent, managing the value of assets and liabilities and so on. And at the end of the day the managers and directors make the calls. It's not the actuaries problem if they decide to prepare just 9 million for claims and take the risk, it's not the actuaries concern if they decide to screw the account to evade taxes, it's not the actuaries concern if they decide to label an appraising piece of land as a liability.
*
Actuaries are mainly dealing with models and one of the important model is cash flow models. If actuary has no accounting knowledge, it is hard to deal with cash flow. And they are also the one that manage the company's solvency ratio, capital adequacy ratio etc. Yet, if they don't know any accounting knowledge, how are they able to managed that?

This post has been edited by Searingmage: Aug 10 2010, 09:35 AM
jpysh2004
post Aug 10 2010, 11:22 AM

New Member
*
Junior Member
10 posts

Joined: May 2006


QUOTE(Searingmage @ Aug 10 2010, 09:17 AM)
I thought projecting future financial statement is one of actuary valuable skills. I did not say actuary are the one doing accounts, I am merely saying, actuary will project all future possible outcome. Well, at least, my lecturer who had been in the industry told me about this. And also, if they do not know how to read those book keeping, how are they suppose to know if they are doing well? One of the method of input validation is reconciliation with accounting, no? So, they need, however minimal, some accounting knowledge.
Also, a person graduated or not means a lot. Because, one has entered the industry while another hasn't. So, one will know what the industry actually is while the other merely heard a third party saying. I am the latter but my source is from my lecturer who had been in the industry. As I mention, while actuary don't need to personally do the accounts, actuary need to know accounts. Because sometimes accountants will need to consult actuary on certain elements of the financial statements. In fact, in accounting itself, there's a part on actuarial basis of accounting.
On your red herring regarding raising animals, I would've to say the 10 years guy will be able to raise animal better, the other only have paper knowledge and don't have hands on experience.


Added on August 10, 2010, 9:27 am

Actuaries are mainly dealing with models and one of the important model is cash flow models. If actuary has no accounting knowledge, it is hard to deal with cash flow. And they are also the one that manage the company's solvency ratio, capital adequacy ratio etc. Yet, if they don't know any accounting knowledge, how are they able to managed that?
*
If you really did read my replies, I have never denied that actuary doesn't need accounting skills. My comments mainly target on ur statement that
"In fact, the accountants in insurance company may even need to consult actuaries on certain part of the accounts, since insurance company use a lot of assumptions.", if you did realized what you typed. What i replied is to mainly show the difference between actuary and accounting and how actuarial science and accounting differs. Even though actuarial science student learns accounting, the accounting we learnt is so minute as compared to accountants that it can be hardly used. Just because insurance company uses a lot of assumptions, doesn't mean accountants need to consult actuary on parts of the accounts. True that actuary projects all possible outcomes, but financial statement? Again, ask this simple question. The difference between actuary and accountants are already explained by mumeichan. Again, I am talking about accountants and actuary in an insurance company, in reply of ur comments.

Again, if you really did read my replies. It doesnt matter whether one graduated already or not. One who graduated doesnt means he has already entered the field and doesnt means he/she better knows the field. Since you also hear from the third party saying just like us, there is actually no point in asking whether the person has graduated already or not or has the person passed any exam. Because just like you, we got our information as third party. And, we got our information from actuarial organization and actuaries, yes actuaries.

And about red herring, again, if you really did read my replies, I mentioned "Who knows more about raising animals?". I merely talk about how well a person knows a topic about a field, not how well a person can do in the field. As i mentioned. "True that a person who involves in that field have more experience, but doesnt means he knows more about the field as compared to someone who did research on that field."


Added on August 10, 2010, 11:36 am
QUOTE(Searingmage @ Aug 10 2010, 09:17 AM)
Actuaries are mainly dealing with models and one of the important model is cash flow models. If actuary has no accounting knowledge, it is hard to deal with cash flow. And they are also the one that manage the company's solvency ratio, capital adequacy ratio etc. Yet, if they don't know any accounting knowledge, how are they able to managed that?
*
What you are saying here is a very minute field of actuary. Actuarial field is so versatile that it's popular in not just insurance. It's undeniable that actuaries deals with models. However, in most of the actuarial field, actuary acts as an consultant or adviser. They seldom get hand-ons on the company's solvency ratio and etc.



This post has been edited by jpysh2004: Aug 10 2010, 11:36 AM
mumeichan
post Aug 10 2010, 12:51 PM

Member
*******
Senior Member
4,152 posts

Joined: May 2005
QUOTE(Searingmage @ Aug 10 2010, 09:17 AM)
I thought projecting future financial statement is one of actuary valuable skills. I did not say actuary are the one doing accounts, I am merely saying, actuary will project all future possible outcome. Well, at least, my lecturer who had been in the industry told me about this. And also, if they do not know how to read those book keeping, how are they suppose to know if they are doing well? One of the method of input validation is reconciliation with accounting, no? So, they need, however minimal, some accounting knowledge.
Also, a person graduated or not means a lot. Because, one has entered the industry while another hasn't. So, one will know what the industry actually is while the other merely heard a third party saying. I am the latter but my source is from my lecturer who had been in the industry. As I mention, while actuary don't need to personally do the accounts, actuary need to know accounts. Because sometimes accountants will need to consult actuary on certain elements of the financial statements. In fact, in accounting itself, there's a part on actuarial basis of accounting.
On your red herring regarding raising animals, I would've to say the 10 years guy will be able to raise animal better, the other only have paper knowledge and don't have hands on experience.


Added on August 10, 2010, 9:27 am

Actuaries are mainly dealing with models and one of the important model is cash flow models. If actuary has no accounting knowledge, it is hard to deal with cash flow. And they are also the one that manage the company's solvency ratio, capital adequacy ratio etc. Yet, if they don't know any accounting knowledge, how are they able to managed that?
*
Whatever you're studying, it's not actuarial science. How are they going to be able to manage all that? Simple, they don't. I'm sorry to say, your lecturer is misinformed about the actuarial profession. I'm not saying the that a person with an actuarial degree or a member of an actuarial society is stuck to a certain kind of job, different companies structure their human resource differently, that's for sure. However, when talking about the field of actuarial science and the profession of an actuary in a bigger companies and consultancy firms when job responsibilities are kept specialized and separate I know you're wrong.

I can be so sure because all other hi bye acquaintance aside, I've a friend who I've spoken to in great detail about her job scope as an actuary from Great Eastern, London and one of my professor is holds multiple senior positions in many actuarial societies in US, including the SOA and CAS and has held a very senior position as both an actuary and an auditor in an insurance company. I will probably not meet someone as authoritative as him in the actuarial field until I reach a senior position in a big company.

I gain nothing really from writing on this forum. I don't tell you who I am, where I study or even who my professor really is. I'm not putting anyone down nor am I trying to boast. I could just be a keyboard warrior posting nonsense and the truth is I studied for some time, dropped out of college and I'm now starting back again. The reason I'm posting here is because I've seen and met many people who regret halfway during their course of study and also after they start work because they have been ingrained with misinformation stemming from erroneous hearsay and they're lost when then reality of the situation hits the fantasy in their head. I'm not at all surprised that people think accounts is part of the actuarial field. I've also heard countless comments that claim accounts is part of the actuarial field. In fact, I was studying to take the CAT exams a few years back. I myself and lucky I met some people who woke me up. My post alone isn't going to fully convince anyone, but it's a different voice from what's normally heard and I hope I spurs a person to look deeper into their area of interest and consult more credible and authoritative sources then you and me.

It's pointless if you keep making more and more elaborate statements about the same thing which I say if not true and ask me "how are they going to do that?". We'll just go around in circles since my point is they don't do all of that. It's just going to be whose words over whose and who gets the last say.
jpysh2004
post Aug 10 2010, 01:51 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
10 posts

Joined: May 2006


QUOTE(mumeichan @ Aug 10 2010, 12:51 PM)
Whatever you're studying, it's not actuarial science. How are they going to be able to manage all that? Simple, they don't. I'm sorry to say, your lecturer is misinformed about the actuarial profession. I'm not saying the that a person with an actuarial degree or a member of an actuarial society is stuck to a certain kind of job, different companies structure their human resource differently, that's for sure. However, when talking about the field of actuarial science and the profession of an actuary in a bigger companies and consultancy firms when job responsibilities are kept specialized and separate I know you're wrong.

I can be so sure because all other hi bye acquaintance aside, I've a friend who I've spoken to in great detail about her job scope as an actuary from Great Eastern, London and one of my professor is holds multiple senior positions in many actuarial societies in US, including the SOA and CAS and has held a very senior position as both an actuary and an auditor in an insurance company. I will probably not meet someone as authoritative as him in the actuarial field until I reach a senior position in a big company.

I gain nothing really from writing on this forum. I don't tell you who I am, where I study or even who my professor really is. I'm not putting anyone down nor am I trying to boast. I could just be a keyboard warrior posting nonsense and the truth is I studied for some time, dropped out of college and I'm now starting back again. The reason I'm posting here is because I've seen and met many people who regret halfway during their course of study and also after they start work because they have been ingrained with misinformation stemming from erroneous hearsay and they're lost when then reality of the situation hits the fantasy in their head. I'm not at all surprised that people think accounts is part of the actuarial field. I've also heard countless comments that claim accounts is part of the actuarial field. In fact, I was studying to take the CAT exams a few years back. I myself and lucky I met some people who woke me up. My post alone isn't going to fully convince anyone, but it's a different voice from what's normally heard and I hope I spurs a person to look deeper into their area of interest and consult more credible and authoritative sources then you and me.

It's pointless if you keep making more and more elaborate statements about the same thing which I say if not true and ask me "how are they going to do that?". We'll just go around in circles since my point is they don't do all of that. It's just going to be whose words over whose and who gets the last say.
*
Yeah, somehow i have to agree. I have to say the only reason I reply to this thread is that there are too many misleading information about actuarial science. There are just too many people complaining how hard to become an actuary from what they heard. They stopped when they thinks it's difficult to achieve. In the end, they achieve nothing.




Actuary didnt get paid for doing nothing and actuary do not just happened to "pass"the exam. There are reasons behind the high salary and good job specs and it didnt come by just complaining and do nothing. Yet, Actuary didnt just become the best job in 2010 for nothing.

If you are determined for a career, you will work hard for it. There is no easy way out in making a successful career. Complaining how hard a career can be are just excuses of lazy people who do not want to work hard. When i was in high school, I used to think that I can get a high paying job that doesnt need to work hard. Guess what, no such thing. Before I decided to take up an actuarial degree, I heard things about actuarial science and how hard it is. Guess what, i am finishing second year now and i passed my first professional paper with only one trial and studied for only one month.

This post has been edited by jpysh2004: Aug 10 2010, 01:56 PM
Searingmage
post Aug 10 2010, 04:30 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,809 posts

Joined: Feb 2010


QUOTE(jpysh2004 @ Aug 10 2010, 01:51 PM)
Yeah, somehow i have to agree. I have to say the only reason I reply to this thread is that there are too many misleading information about actuarial science. There are just too many people complaining how hard to become an actuary from what they heard. They stopped when they thinks it's difficult to achieve. In the end, they achieve nothing.
Actuary didnt get paid for doing nothing and actuary do not just happened to "pass"the exam. There are reasons behind the high salary and good job specs and it didnt come by just complaining and do nothing. Yet, Actuary didnt just become the best job in 2010 for nothing.

If you are determined for a career, you will work hard for it. There is no easy way out in making a successful career. Complaining how hard a career can be are just excuses of lazy people who do not want to work hard. When i was in high school, I used to think that I can get a high paying job that doesnt need to work hard. Guess what, no such thing. Before I decided to take up an actuarial degree, I heard things about actuarial science and how hard it is. Guess what, i am finishing second year now and i passed my first professional paper with only one trial and studied for only one month.
*
First, I would like to congrats you on passing your exam P. However, back to my point, I am simply implying that it is wrong to state that accounting and actuary has NOTHING to do at all. However minimal, we would still need at least basic accounting knowledge.

@mumeichan : I will not deny your third party's credibility, but have you actually asked your professor exactly whether accounting and actuary has nothing to do at all, or is it just your opinion?
Also, whatever I am studying, it is definitely actuarial science. And, in the subject I currently studying, mentioned that in insurance, actuary use reconciliation with accounting data as an input validation. And unfortunately,actuaries need to manage what I mentioned. Actuaries (at least in Malaysia) are the people responsible for managing solvency and capital adequacy of the company, and also solvency testing. If you say not all actuaries need accounting knowledge, then I will have to agree with you. But if you say all actuaries don't need accounting knowledge, then I disagree.

This post has been edited by Searingmage: Aug 10 2010, 04:31 PM
zstan
post Aug 10 2010, 06:38 PM

10k Club
********
All Stars
15,856 posts

Joined: Nov 2007
From: Zion



QUOTE(jpysh2004 @ Aug 10 2010, 01:51 PM)
Yeah, somehow i have to agree. I have to say the only reason I reply to this thread is that there are too many misleading information about actuarial science. There are just too many people complaining how hard to become an actuary from what they heard. They stopped when they thinks it's difficult to achieve. In the end, they achieve nothing.
Actuary didnt get paid for doing nothing and actuary do not just happened to "pass"the exam. There are reasons behind the high salary and good job specs and it didnt come by just complaining and do nothing. Yet, Actuary didnt just become the best job in 2010 for nothing.

If you are determined for a career, you will work hard for it. There is no easy way out in making a successful career. Complaining how hard a career can be are just excuses of lazy people who do not want to work hard. When i was in high school, I used to think that I can get a high paying job that doesnt need to work hard. Guess what, no such thing. Before I decided to take up an actuarial degree, I heard things about actuarial science and how hard it is. Guess what, i am finishing second year now and i passed my first professional paper with only one trial and studied for only one month.
*
your real test lies when you start working bro.

try studying for exams and working to make a living at the same time. don't be too overconfident yet.
trapezohedron13
post Aug 10 2010, 09:39 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Junior Member
703 posts

Joined: Jun 2010
From: Kuala Lumpur
Hahaha... interesting. Actuaries have traditional and non-traditional roles too. It is still evolving, and there is no correct answer of whether something is related to actuarial field. Be open minded. There are people combining genetics and actuarial research even. The possibilities are there.
siaolang
post Aug 12 2010, 11:39 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
130 posts

Joined: Feb 2008
interesting but pointless arguments.....

Take up some internship experience instead of looking from a student's view which is formed either from illusion/hearsay.

When you start working, maybe you will be too tired to argue anymore which relates to which.


zstan
post Aug 12 2010, 12:15 PM

10k Club
********
All Stars
15,856 posts

Joined: Nov 2007
From: Zion



QUOTE(siaolang @ Aug 12 2010, 11:39 AM)
interesting but pointless arguments.....

Take up some internship experience instead of looking from a student's view which is formed either from illusion/hearsay.

When you start working, maybe you will be too tired to argue anymore which relates to which.
*
u think so easy get internships a? especially for actuary positions. shakehead.gif
mumeichan
post Aug 12 2010, 01:46 PM

Member
*******
Senior Member
4,152 posts

Joined: May 2005
QUOTE(siaolang @ Aug 12 2010, 11:39 AM)
interesting but pointless arguments.....

Take up some internship experience instead of looking from a student's view which is formed either from illusion/hearsay.

When you start working, maybe you will be too tired to argue anymore which relates to which.
*
We're not arguing about anything, me, jpysh, sear and the other are all taking out time to type what we've have learnt so far. If you're already working and wish to tell us how your perspective changed from a student to an actuary then we're all ears.

If you're not interested in contributing anything, why don't you just stfu and masturbate to porn.

Searingmage
post Aug 12 2010, 09:24 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,809 posts

Joined: Feb 2010


QUOTE(mumeichan @ Aug 12 2010, 01:46 PM)
We're not arguing about anything, me, jpysh, sear and the other are all taking out time to type what we've have learnt so far. If you're already working and wish to tell us how your perspective changed from a student to an actuary then we're all ears. 

If you're not interested in contributing anything, why don't you just stfu and masturbate to porn.

*
Yeap, we are merely discussing so that those who plan to take actuarial science will know how's the course is like.. They might also like opinion from those who are currently pursuing actuarial science degree.
As mumeichan say, if you're an actuary, we're all ears, but if you have nothing to contribute besides insults, then I don't see a purpose for you to join the discussion.
paranoidman
post Aug 17 2010, 10:53 PM

New Member
*
Newbie
3 posts

Joined: Dec 2009
From: Klang Town


Well hello everyone,

Look, i'm merely just 17 years old, soon to sit for my major examination at this age, the Sijil Pelajaran Malaysia. I've placed actuary as my first option in my career pathway and so would like to seek advice from you guys. From what i've heard, Actuarial Science degree is only available overseas. According to latest news, the JPA scholarship no longers offers you to study overseas. Clearly, scholarship is definitely not an option for me anymore(correct me if i'm wrong). So, can anybody tell me the options i could take after finishing my SPM to get to the actuarial science degree (minising financial expenditure if possible)?

*Is it a good idea to major in other degrees (like computering) first and then get to actuarial science by doing exams like what dubai_gal's doing?
*If i choose to major in actuarial science, my options in job opportunities will narrow, wouldn't it be risky if i couldn't get a job as the actuarial science course is technical?
zstan
post Aug 17 2010, 11:02 PM

10k Club
********
All Stars
15,856 posts

Joined: Nov 2007
From: Zion



QUOTE(paranoidman @ Aug 17 2010, 10:53 PM)
Well hello everyone,

Look, i'm merely just 17 years old, soon to sit for my major examination at this age, the Sijil Pelajaran Malaysia. I've placed actuary as my first option in my career pathway and so would like to seek advice from you guys. From what i've heard, Actuarial Science degree is only available overseas. According to latest news, the JPA scholarship no longers offers you to study overseas. Clearly, scholarship is definitely not an option for me anymore(correct me if i'm wrong). So, can anybody tell me the options i could take after finishing my SPM to get to the actuarial science degree (minising financial expenditure if possible)?

*Is it a good idea to major in other degrees (like computering) first and then get to actuarial science by doing exams like what dubai_gal's doing?
*If i choose to major in actuarial science, my options in job opportunities will narrow, wouldn't it be risky if i couldn't get a job as the actuarial science course is technical?
*
AS is available 4 + 0 in Utar and UCSI..
mumeichan
post Aug 17 2010, 11:30 PM

Member
*******
Senior Member
4,152 posts

Joined: May 2005
QUOTE(paranoidman @ Aug 17 2010, 10:53 PM)
Well hello everyone,

Look, i'm merely just 17 years old, soon to sit for my major examination at this age, the Sijil Pelajaran Malaysia. I've placed actuary as my first option in my career pathway and so would like to seek advice from you guys. From what i've heard, Actuarial Science degree is only available overseas. According to latest news, the JPA scholarship no longers offers you to study overseas. Clearly, scholarship is definitely not an option for me anymore(correct me if i'm wrong). So, can anybody tell me the options i could take after finishing my SPM to get to the actuarial science degree (minising financial expenditure if possible)?

*Is it a good idea to major in other degrees (like computering) first and then get to actuarial science by doing exams like what dubai_gal's doing?
*If i choose to major in actuarial science, my options in job opportunities will narrow, wouldn't it be risky if i couldn't get a job as the actuarial science course is technical?
*
Well stuff like finance, engineering and computer science all involve alot of math. And those math will serve as the foundation for your actuarial papers, that is if you wanna be an actuary through the professional qualification route. Of course they are many kind of jobs that are called actuary and many different titles doing actuarial work, and difference companies have different requirements. The main question if do you want to learn actuarial math or not? Whether you're gonna be called an actuary, a risk manager, a financial consultant, a manager, the big boss or whatnot comes later. At this stage, you gotta ask yourself what you wanna learn first before you can see what you can be with what you have learned. Like I said the actuarial fields is all about math used to calculate probabilities and values for business to you. Other majors like computer science and engineering provide the pure math basics. While degrees like finance provide the financial management and investment parts. But the actual actuarial models are part of these course and you've gotta study them yourself. These stuff makes up some of the actuarial papers.
tanjinjack
post Aug 18 2010, 12:16 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
4,122 posts

Joined: Jul 2008
From: Malaysia


QUOTE(mumeichan @ Aug 17 2010, 11:30 PM)
Well stuff like finance, engineering and computer science all involve alot of math. And those math will serve as the foundation for your actuarial papers, that is if you wanna be an actuary through the professional qualification route. Of course they are many kind of jobs that are called actuary and many different titles doing actuarial work, and difference companies have different requirements. The main question if do you want to learn actuarial math or not? Whether you're gonna be called an actuary, a risk manager, a financial consultant, a manager, the big boss or whatnot comes later. At this stage, you gotta ask yourself what you wanna learn first before you can see what you can be with what you have learned. Like I said the actuarial fields is all about math used to calculate probabilities and values for business to you. Other majors like computer science and engineering provide the pure math basics. While degrees like finance provide the financial management and investment parts. But the actual actuarial models are part of these course and you've gotta study them yourself. These stuff makes up some of the actuarial papers.
*
Just a bit correction there. Computer Science does Discrete Maths while Engineering involves mainly calculus, differential equations and numerical/computational methods.


Added on August 18, 2010, 12:23 am
QUOTE(paranoidman @ Aug 17 2010, 10:53 PM)
Well hello everyone,

Look, i'm merely just 17 years old, soon to sit for my major examination at this age, the Sijil Pelajaran Malaysia. I've placed actuary as my first option in my career pathway and so would like to seek advice from you guys. From what i've heard, Actuarial Science degree is only available overseas. According to latest news, the JPA scholarship no longers offers you to study overseas. Clearly, scholarship is definitely not an option for me anymore(correct me if i'm wrong). So, can anybody tell me the options i could take after finishing my SPM to get to the actuarial science degree (minising financial expenditure if possible)?

*Is it a good idea to major in other degrees (like computering) first and then get to actuarial science by doing exams like what dubai_gal's doing?
*If i choose to major in actuarial science, my options in job opportunities will narrow, wouldn't it be risky if i couldn't get a job as the actuarial science course is technical?
*
There is numerous pathways in getting an actuarial degree.

Cheapest will be doing it in IPTA like UM.
A bit more expensive will be doing it in IPTS like UTAR.

A lot more expensive will be doing it in overseas institution completely/partially.
Some of the cheaper (still costly though) options include twinning programme with American universities through the American Degree Transfer Programme.
In UK though, University of Southampton does give out scholarship up to 5,000GBP per annum (subject to academic performance) - probably the cheapest you can get in UK. Heriot-Watt, Kent and others are more expensive.

This post has been edited by tanjinjack: Aug 18 2010, 12:23 AM
mumeichan
post Aug 18 2010, 12:47 AM

Member
*******
Senior Member
4,152 posts

Joined: May 2005
[quote=tanjinjack,Aug 18 2010, 12:16 AM]
Just a bit correction there. Computer Science does Discrete Maths while Engineering involves mainly calculus, differential equations and numerical/computational methods.


Added on August 18, 2010, 12:23 am

Oh ya, discrete math is not needed for actuarial science. But well don't computer science use calculus and linear algebra also, vectors, trigo, matrices and stuff? I see that alot when I read about programming(I do abit myself) and yea I know comp sc is not programming, so I could have assumed wrongly. For Eng, the calculus, differential equations, linear algebra stuff is the same. The probability for engineering books I see also cover the same probability topics. But I do believe engineers learn quite abit of number theory, those CRT, polynomials, manipulations, residues, system of equations stuff, series and stuff right? Correct me if I'm wrong. Well, so all those stuff also is not needed for the actuarial papers. Well, if I'm mistaken again correct me thx.
paranoidman
post Aug 18 2010, 05:16 PM

New Member
*
Newbie
3 posts

Joined: Dec 2009
From: Klang Town


QUOTE(tanjinjack @ Aug 18 2010, 12:16 AM)

Added on August 18, 2010, 12:23 am

There is numerous pathways in getting an actuarial degree.

Cheapest will be doing it in IPTA like UM.
A bit more expensive will be doing it in IPTS like UTAR.

A lot more expensive will be doing it in overseas institution completely/partially.
Some of the cheaper (still costly though) options include twinning programme with American universities through the American Degree Transfer Programme.
In UK though, University of Southampton does give out scholarship up to 5,000GBP per annum (subject to academic performance) - probably the cheapest you can get in UK. Heriot-Watt, Kent and others are more expensive.
*
Local Universities does offer this degree? Is the creditability recognised? This means scholarship is an option for me?

I assume you are a malaysian as well as you know about IPT. Mind to share with me on how you made your way through to where you are now? Which university are you studying at? Can you tell me a little bit on what you study there?

Questions:
*Is it a good idea to major in other degrees (like computering) first and then get to actuarial science by doing exams like what dubai_gal's doing?
*If i choose to major in actuarial science, my options in job opportunities will narrow, wouldn't it be risky if i couldn't get a job as the actuarial science course is technical?

This post has been edited by paranoidman: Aug 18 2010, 05:17 PM
tanjinjack
post Aug 18 2010, 07:33 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
4,122 posts

Joined: Jul 2008
From: Malaysia


QUOTE(paranoidman @ Aug 18 2010, 05:16 PM)
Local Universities does offer this degree? Is the creditability recognised? This means scholarship is an option for me?

I assume you are a malaysian as well as you know about IPT. Mind to share with me on how you made your way through to where you are now? Which university are you studying at? Can you tell me a little bit on what you study there?

Questions:
*Is it a good idea to major in other degrees (like computering) first and then get to actuarial science by doing exams like what dubai_gal's doing?
*If i choose to major in actuarial science, my options in job opportunities will narrow, wouldn't it be risky if i couldn't get a job as the actuarial science course is technical?
*
I am a Malaysian but I do not do Actuarial Science. I just know a bit of the process in getting into AS programme as I nearly went into this programme.

I am not expert, and what I say about AS may not hold true as I come from Engineering background.

What is the most important thing in an actuarial career is not the degree, but the papers you have taken.
Taking an actuarial degree eases the attempts of those papers as you tend to get exemptions from some of the papers.
In short, getting an actuarial degree does not lead you becoming an actuary, and not taking actuarial degree does not cut off your possibility in becoming an actuary as well.
If you do not wish to take Actuarial Science as your first degree yet wanting to keep yourself a reasonable option in attempting the field, degree with high contents of Mathematics are strongly desired. Engineering, Economics, Finance, Operational Research, Physics, Mathematics etc. to name a few. The strong Maths background in those courses provide you with a smoother start of your actuarial career as you are mathematically trained already.
But bare in mind, Actuarial Science is not Maths. It's a combination of a lot of subjects including Maths, Economics, Communication Skills etc. that form the umbrella of Risk Studies. Being good in Maths does not guarantee anything.

Your job opportunity will not be narrow shall you took an actuarial degree and not pursue the path of becoming an actuary. A lot of graduates of AS degree get employment in similar fields, like banking, finance etc.

If you are determined to become an actuary, just do an actuarial degree. It saves a lot of troubles and you get to concentrate on stuff in achieving your career. What you should be worrying is, do you really want to be an actuary? (Or, you are just another someone who thinks that 'I am good in Maths so I do Actuarial Science because I don't like anything else'. No offense though smile.gif ) If your main interest lies in Maths, a degree in Maths will be better.
Searingmage
post Aug 19 2010, 12:18 AM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,809 posts

Joined: Feb 2010


QUOTE(paranoidman @ Aug 18 2010, 05:16 PM)
Local Universities does offer this degree? Is the creditability recognised? This means scholarship is an option for me?

I assume you are a malaysian as well as you know about IPT. Mind to share with me on how you made your way through to where you are now? Which university are you studying at? Can you tell me a little bit on what you study there?

Questions:
*Is it a good idea to major in other degrees (like computering) first and then get to actuarial science by doing exams like what dubai_gal's doing?
*If i choose to major in actuarial science, my options in job opportunities will narrow, wouldn't it be risky if i couldn't get a job as the actuarial science course is technical?
*
I am currently doing actuarial science in a local private university. Yes, there will be scholarship option for you. As for recognition, if you are serious about actuarial science, professional papers are actually more important. You can graduate at the world best university, but w/o any professional papers, you are still not really recognized.
For the SOA (society of actuary), some universities (or rather, most that offer actuarial science program, including universities in Malaysia) have exemptions on the VEE part. There are no exemptions for other parts (which are the exams).
Actuarial science is indeed a very specific course, but most universities teach more than just actuarial science. They include some business, economic and finance part. Hence, you may be able to look job in that sector if you don't want to be an actuary after taking up the course.
Its depends on your preference really. If you really want to major in other degree courses, then I suggest statistics or financial engineering. While they still differ from actuarial science, at least they are close compared to computering etc.


Added on August 19, 2010, 12:21 am
QUOTE(tanjinjack @ Aug 18 2010, 07:33 PM)
If you are determined to become an actuary, just do an actuarial degree. It saves a lot of troubles and you get to concentrate on stuff in achieving your career. What you should be worrying is, do you really want to be an actuary? (Or, you are just another someone who thinks that 'I am good in Maths so I do Actuarial Science because I don't like anything else'. No offense though smile.gif ) If your main interest lies in Maths, a degree in Maths will be better.
*
Lol, I was a someone who went for actuarial science because maths is my best subject.
However, I find myself happy, though not without stress, with my current course =)
But you're right about that. If main interest lies in maths, degree in maths or applied maths is also a viable option. Actuarial Maths focus more on probability. Hence, if you are the type that prefer calculus, then maybe you may not like actuarial maths.


This post has been edited by Searingmage: Aug 19 2010, 12:21 AM
paranoidman
post Aug 19 2010, 10:18 AM

New Member
*
Newbie
3 posts

Joined: Dec 2009
From: Klang Town


QUOTE(tanjinjack @ Aug 18 2010, 07:33 PM)
I am a Malaysian but I do not do Actuarial Science. I just know a bit of the process in getting into AS programme as I nearly went into this programme.

I am not expert, and what I say about AS may not hold true as I come from Engineering background.

What is the most important thing in an actuarial career is not the degree, but the papers you have taken.
Taking an actuarial degree eases the attempts of those papers as you tend to get exemptions from some of the papers.
In short, getting an actuarial degree does not lead you becoming an actuary, and not taking actuarial degree does not cut off your possibility in becoming an actuary as well.
If you do not wish to take Actuarial Science as your first degree yet wanting to keep yourself a reasonable option in attempting the field, degree with high contents of Mathematics are strongly desired. Engineering, Economics, Finance, Operational Research, Physics, Mathematics etc. to name a few. The strong Maths background in those courses provide you with a smoother start of your actuarial career as you are mathematically trained already.
But bare in mind, Actuarial Science is not Maths. It's a combination of a lot of subjects including Maths, Economics, Communication Skills etc. that form the umbrella of Risk Studies. Being good in Maths does not guarantee anything.

Your job opportunity will not be narrow shall you took an actuarial degree and not pursue the path of becoming an actuary. A lot of graduates of AS degree get employment in similar fields, like banking, finance etc.

If you are determined to become an actuary, just do an actuarial degree. It saves a lot of troubles and you get to concentrate on stuff in achieving your career. What you should be worrying is, do you really want to be an actuary? (Or, you are just another someone who thinks that 'I am good in Maths so I do Actuarial Science because I don't like anything else'. No offense though smile.gif ) If your main interest lies in Maths, a degree in Maths will be better.
*
Thanks for the information smile.gif. Well, I still have 6 months for me to decide which course is suitable. And here i am doing my research on this degree.

QUOTE(Searingmage @ Aug 19 2010, 12:18 AM)
I am currently doing actuarial science in a local private university. Yes, there will be scholarship option for you. As for recognition, if you are serious about actuarial science, professional papers are actually more important. You can graduate at the world best university, but w/o any professional papers, you are still not really recognized.
For the SOA (society of actuary), some universities (or rather, most that offer actuarial science program, including universities in Malaysia) have exemptions on the VEE part. There are no exemptions for other parts (which are the exams).
Actuarial science is indeed a very specific course, but most universities teach more than just actuarial science. They include some business, economic and finance part. Hence, you may be able to look job in that sector if you don't want to be an actuary after taking up the course.
Its depends on your preference really. If you really want to major in other degree courses, then I suggest statistics or financial engineering. While they still differ from actuarial science, at least they are close compared to computering etc.


Added on August 19, 2010, 12:21 am

Lol, I was a someone who went for actuarial science because maths is my best subject.
However, I find myself happy, though not without stress, with my current course =)
But you're right about that. If main interest lies in maths, degree in maths or applied maths is also a viable option. Actuarial Maths focus more on probability. Hence, if you are the type that prefer calculus, then maybe you may not like actuarial maths.
*
Exactly how many papers do you need to become a qualified actuary? What is VEE?
Searingmage
post Aug 22 2010, 09:57 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,809 posts

Joined: Feb 2010


QUOTE(paranoidman @ Aug 19 2010, 10:18 AM)
Thanks for the information smile.gif. Well, I still have 6 months for me to decide which course is suitable. And here i am doing my research on this degree.
Exactly how many papers do you need to become a qualified actuary? What is VEE?
*
Depends on which society you want to join. You can check it out at www.soa.org for SoA. VEE is part of the requirement to be a qualified actuary. It deals with stuffs like economic and finance and statistic.
LightningFist
post Aug 24 2010, 02:26 AM

Minion of the Damned
Group Icon
VIP
3,965 posts

Joined: Apr 2009
I am looking to start an Actuarial Science degree (hopefully if I get in) as well.

Please, anyone with knowledge in this area, or who has studied Actuarial Science/Actuarial Maths/Finance, or is in this field, could you please enlighten us with exactly what sort of maths is involved? I have seen that there is a substantial amount of algebra, calculus, and probability and statistics.

Specifically, what other maths subjects are there? And how far is the programming?

Also, I have an important question: when you start an Actuarial Science degree, are you expected to know a lot of the pure maths part? Or will they teach you most of it? What if I didn't take Further Maths?

Thank you.
zstan
post Aug 24 2010, 08:51 AM

10k Club
********
All Stars
15,856 posts

Joined: Nov 2007
From: Zion



QUOTE(LightningFist @ Aug 24 2010, 02:26 AM)
I am looking to start an Actuarial Science degree (hopefully if I get in) as well.

Please, anyone with knowledge in this area, or who has studied Actuarial Science/Actuarial Maths/Finance, or is in this field, could you please enlighten us with exactly what sort of maths is involved? I have seen that there is a substantial amount of algebra, calculus, and probability and statistics.

Specifically, what other maths subjects are there? And how far is the programming?

Also, I have an important question: when you start an Actuarial Science degree, are you expected to know a lot of the pure maths part? Or will they teach you most of it? What if I didn't take Further Maths?

Thank you.
*
if u r hardworking enough.. read back all 8 pages of post...all your questions should be answered before already. cheers. biggrin.gif
mumeichan
post Aug 24 2010, 09:12 AM

Member
*******
Senior Member
4,152 posts

Joined: May 2005
QUOTE(LightningFist @ Aug 24 2010, 02:26 AM)
I am looking to start an Actuarial Science degree (hopefully if I get in) as well.

Please, anyone with knowledge in this area, or who has studied Actuarial Science/Actuarial Maths/Finance, or is in this field, could you please enlighten us with exactly what sort of maths is involved? I have seen that there is a substantial amount of algebra, calculus, and probability and statistics.

Specifically, what other maths subjects are there? And how far is the programming?

Also, I have an important question: when you start an Actuarial Science degree, are you expected to know a lot of the pure maths part? Or will they teach you most of it? What if I didn't take Further Maths?

Thank you.
*
Substantial amount is a dangerous word.

Algebra is a wide area, you will do linear algebra dealing with matrices, vectors and solving linear systems, but nothing to do with complex algebra manipulations.

You'll learn pretty much as much calculus as you can in the undergraduate level. This serves as the foundation for the calculations you'll use in probability and the actuarial models, financial model and economic models. Don't think too much of the work model, it's well just a logical set of calculations put together to get a certain value. Like say, you know GDP? GDP is not some natural value that exist in this universe, it's a value humans created. So to calculate the GDP, we've to rely on the definition of it and what's supposed to go inside. Just an example, actuaries don't calculate GDP.

Probability, all the actual actuarial subjects are applied probability.

Statistic, well to get the probabilities of most things, we need statistical data right, that's as much as well learn. We don't learn statistics as deep as stats majors. In my uni, the statistics isn't applied, that means just the statistical theories and nothing applied to the actuarail profession itself.

Programming, different universities have different ideas on this. I've got to take 1 programming class, the most basic one. Isn't applied to the actuarial field. I still don't know how I'll use programming during my job though. Maybe this is for further study.

If you're gonna do it in UK, you need to take Further Maths, they won't teach you from scratch. In US, even if you didn't take Add Maths in SPM it's ok because you can just start from all the basic subjects.
LightningFist
post Aug 24 2010, 11:07 AM

Minion of the Damned
Group Icon
VIP
3,965 posts

Joined: Apr 2009
Thanks for that.

I realise a lot of the skills needed for work in whichever field (finance, quantitative finance, actuary, banking) can and will be learned only then. But before that I have to do well first. I know that I cannot enter uni and simply because I don't have a further maths background I allow myself to fall behind.

Ok well I didn't take further maths that's why I'm planning to take classes or something at least to help me. I'd like to know what there was in Further Maths that I might have missed out on - CIE A level further maths is only A2 and only 2 papers (not sure if this is how it is for everyone)... while other A level boards have further math modules for AS and A2, some of which are interchangeable...

In A level maths I have covered algebra, pemutations and combinations, binomial expansion, polynomials, series/progression, differentiation, integration, differential equations, vectors, complex numbers (and others, but these are specifically mentioned in the CT list).

Now here are things I have never done/heard of (I am reading out of a non-comprehensive CT1-CT8 math content list): interpolation and local approximation, higher order derivatives, Lagrange multipliers/maximisation under constraints, Taylor's theorem (power series expansion of e^x), double integrals and changing their order, partial derivatives of two variables, (what are: exact, separarble, logistic, linear?) differential equations, matrices.

Now here are things in the CIE Further Maths syllabus I don't know: polar curves (how does this relate to polar coordinates?), area of a sector (some integration formula), sum of finite series, mathematical induction (something I am worried about), conjecture, reduction formula to evaluate definite integrals, mean values and centroids of 2D and 3D figures using strips, discs, or shells (including use of a parameter), arc lengths, complementary functions, particular integrals, the general solution, de Moivre's theorem for a positive integral exponent (to express trigonometrical ratios of multiple angles in terms of powers of trigonometrical ratios of the fundamental angle; for a positive or negative rational exponent; in expressing powers of sin θ and cos θ in terms of multiple angles; in the summation of series; in finding and using the nth roots of unity),
some vector product rules with |a||b|sinθ n where n is the unit vector (a2 b3 – a3 b2) i + (a3 b1 – a1 b3) j + (a1 b2 – a2 b1) k, the axioms of a linear (vector) space, linear independence, determine whether a given set of vectors is dependent or independent, the subspace spanned by a given set of vectors, a space is a linearly
independent set of vectors that spans the space, the dimension of a space is the number of vectors in a basis, represent linear transformations, ‘column space', ‘row space', ‘range space' and ‘null space', the rank of a square matrix, and use (without proof) the relation between the rank, the
dimension of the null space and the order of the matrix, use methods associated with matrices and linearspaces in the context of the solution of a set of linear
equations, evaluate the determinant of a square matrix and find the inverse of a non-singular matrix, ‘eigenvalue' and ‘eigenvector', as applied to square matrices, express a matrix in the form QDQ^-1.

What do I need to do? How much of the further pure maths is relevant? Is actuarial maths all about the vectors and matrices, because I don't like vectors and I haven't learned a lot of matrices, as exemplified by the above.

(School said prior statistics knowledge is not required)

Thank you. I hope this is understandable.

-About not taking further maths, it was because it was only A2 - of course now I regret it, but it did not seem like the right choice then, and I wanted to maximise my grades - I was wrong, of course, because A2 further maths would have helped immensely. It's not too late (to catch up before heading to uni?)

This post has been edited by LightningFist: Aug 24 2010, 11:23 AM
mumeichan
post Aug 24 2010, 04:18 PM

Member
*******
Senior Member
4,152 posts

Joined: May 2005
Buy Spivak's "Calculus" it isn't really a calculus book, it's an analysis book. If you can do all the questions in that book on your own, then you're good enough to do actuarial math. There's no foundation better than that book.
RyukA
post Aug 25 2010, 12:22 PM

On my way
****
Senior Member
612 posts

Joined: Jan 2010


QUOTE(LightningFist @ Aug 24 2010, 11:07 AM)
Thanks for that.

I realise a lot of the skills needed for work in whichever field (finance, quantitative finance, actuary, banking) can and will be learned only then. But before that I have to do well first. I know that I cannot enter uni and simply because I don't have a further maths background I allow myself to fall behind.

Ok well I didn't take further maths that's why I'm planning to take classes or something at least to help me. I'd like to know what there was in Further Maths that I might have missed out on - CIE A level further maths is only A2 and only 2 papers (not sure if this is how it is for everyone)... while other A level boards have further math modules for AS and A2, some of which are interchangeable...

In A level maths I have covered algebra, pemutations and combinations, binomial expansion, polynomials, series/progression, differentiation, integration, differential equations, vectors, complex numbers (and others, but these are specifically mentioned in the CT list).

Now here are things I have never done/heard of (I am reading out of a non-comprehensive CT1-CT8 math content list): interpolation and local approximation, higher order derivatives, Lagrange multipliers/maximisation under constraints, Taylor's theorem (power series expansion of e^x), double integrals and changing their order, partial derivatives of two variables, (what are: exact, separarble, logistic, linear?) differential equations, matrices.

Now here are things in the CIE Further Maths syllabus I don't know: polar curves (how does this relate to polar coordinates?), area of a sector (some integration formula), sum of finite series, mathematical induction (something I am worried about), conjecture, reduction formula to evaluate definite integrals, mean values and centroids of 2D and 3D figures using strips, discs, or shells (including use of a parameter), arc lengths, complementary functions, particular integrals, the general solution, de Moivre's theorem for a positive integral exponent (to express trigonometrical ratios of multiple angles in terms of powers of trigonometrical ratios of the fundamental angle; for a positive or negative rational exponent; in expressing powers of sin θ and cos θ in terms of multiple angles; in the summation of series; in finding and using the nth roots of unity),
some vector product rules with |a||b|sinθ n where n is the unit vector (a2 b3 – a3 b2) i + (a3 b1 – a1 b3) j + (a1 b2 – a2 b1) k, the axioms of a linear (vector) space, linear independence, determine whether a given set of vectors is dependent or independent, the subspace spanned by a given set of vectors, a space is a linearly
independent set of vectors that spans the space, the dimension of a space is the number of vectors in a basis, represent linear transformations, ‘column space', ‘row space', ‘range space' and ‘null space', the rank of a square matrix, and use (without proof) the relation between the rank, the
dimension of the null space and the order of the matrix, use methods associated with matrices and linearspaces in the context of the solution of a set of linear
equations, evaluate the determinant of a square matrix and find the inverse of a non-singular matrix, ‘eigenvalue' and ‘eigenvector', as applied to square matrices, express a matrix in the form QDQ^-1.

What do I need to do? How much of the further pure maths is relevant? Is actuarial maths all about the vectors and matrices, because I don't like vectors and I haven't learned a lot of matrices, as exemplified by the above.

(School said prior statistics knowledge is not required)

Thank you. I hope this is understandable.

-About not taking further maths, it was because it was only A2 - of course now I regret it, but it did not seem like the right choice then, and I wanted to maximise my grades - I was wrong, of course, because A2 further maths would have helped immensely. It's not too late (to catch up before heading to uni?)
*
LMAO. I have no idea whats happening.
Bout the programming part( previous posts), you just to get a grasp of the idea, nothing too technical.
Our lecturer told us, in career, what u will staring at everyday will be Access and Excel. lol.

When working, most of the cumulative information/ calculations will be done by excel/financial software. but we learn it because
we need to know the concept of the calculations, origins of the "formulas" in order to explain to executives, clients, users what the heck does "this scenario" means.
ultimately, learn it for the sake of passing the exams. hehe

Basic Calculus is essential, some linear algebra coverage. And others just bunch of statistical functions to learn.
During our 1st semester, we took a MATH unit for the sake of prerequisites to latter statistic units. Thats the only "pure math" unit compulsory for us to do. lol
We are not engineers, our emphasis is on statistics.
Mathematical reasoning ability is very important, your understanding depends on that later on.

Welcome on-board. wink.gif
LightningFist
post Aug 25 2010, 05:52 PM

Minion of the Damned
Group Icon
VIP
3,965 posts

Joined: Apr 2009
Haha RyukA you make it sound like it's all quite simple.

I know a lot of posts go up saying actuarial science doesn't have the serious hard kind of straight maths - I like the sound of that, because I am not a hard fan of vectors or trigonometric graphs.

However, looking at all the pure math topics they have, especially matrices and vectors, I kinda go like "Whaaah" cos who the hell likes that stuff anyway.

And mumeichan is telling me one god book will help me. I will definitely check it out after my exams.

Mumeichan are you in a UK school now?

And RyukA how is ANU? Do they have a July intake for Actuarial Science, and is it the same as the Feb intake? I can get in without Further Maths you reckon?
mumeichan
post Aug 25 2010, 07:49 PM

Member
*******
Senior Member
4,152 posts

Joined: May 2005
QUOTE(LightningFist @ Aug 25 2010, 05:52 PM)
Haha RyukA you make it sound like it's all quite simple.

I know a lot of posts go up saying actuarial science doesn't have the serious hard kind of straight maths - I like the sound of that, because I am not a hard fan of vectors or trigonometric graphs.

However, looking at all the pure math topics they have, especially matrices and vectors, I kinda go like "Whaaah" cos who the hell likes that stuff anyway.

And mumeichan is telling me one god book will help me. I will definitely check it out after my exams.

Mumeichan are you in a UK school now?

And RyukA how is ANU? Do they have a July intake for Actuarial Science, and is it the same as the Feb intake? I can get in without Further Maths you reckon?
*
No, I'm studying in the US.



This post has been edited by mumeichan: Aug 25 2010, 07:50 PM
Searingmage
post Aug 25 2010, 10:09 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,809 posts

Joined: Feb 2010


QUOTE(LightningFist @ Aug 24 2010, 11:07 AM)
Thanks for that.

I realise a lot of the skills needed for work in whichever field (finance, quantitative finance, actuary, banking) can and will be learned only then. But before that I have to do well first. I know that I cannot enter uni and simply because I don't have a further maths background I allow myself to fall behind.

Ok well I didn't take further maths that's why I'm planning to take classes or something at least to help me. I'd like to know what there was in Further Maths that I might have missed out on - CIE A level further maths is only A2 and only 2 papers (not sure if this is how it is for everyone)... while other A level boards have further math modules for AS and A2, some of which are interchangeable...

In A level maths I have covered algebra, pemutations and combinations, binomial expansion, polynomials, series/progression, differentiation, integration, differential equations, vectors, complex numbers (and others, but these are specifically mentioned in the CT list).

Now here are things I have never done/heard of (I am reading out of a non-comprehensive CT1-CT8 math content list): interpolation and local approximation, higher order derivatives, Lagrange multipliers/maximisation under constraints, Taylor's theorem (power series expansion of e^x), double integrals and changing their order, partial derivatives of two variables, (what are: exact, separarble, logistic, linear?) differential equations, matrices.

Now here are things in the CIE Further Maths syllabus I don't know: polar curves (how does this relate to polar coordinates?), area of a sector (some integration formula), sum of finite series, mathematical induction (something I am worried about), conjecture, reduction formula to evaluate definite integrals, mean values and centroids of 2D and 3D figures using strips, discs, or shells (including use of a parameter), arc lengths, complementary functions, particular integrals, the general solution, de Moivre's theorem for a positive integral exponent (to express trigonometrical ratios of multiple angles in terms of powers of trigonometrical ratios of the fundamental angle; for a positive or negative rational exponent; in expressing powers of sin θ and cos θ in terms of multiple angles; in the summation of series; in finding and using the nth roots of unity),
some vector product rules with |a||b|sinθ n where n is the unit vector (a2 b3 – a3 b2) i + (a3 b1 – a1 b3) j + (a1 b2 – a2 b1) k, the axioms of a linear (vector) space, linear independence, determine whether a given set of vectors is dependent or independent, the subspace spanned by a given set of vectors, a space is a linearly
independent set of vectors that spans the space, the dimension of a space is the number of vectors in a basis, represent linear transformations, ‘column space', ‘row space', ‘range space' and ‘null space', the rank of a square matrix, and use (without proof) the relation between the rank, the
dimension of the null space and the order of the matrix, use methods associated with matrices and linearspaces in the context of the solution of a set of linear
equations, evaluate the determinant of a square matrix and find the inverse of a non-singular matrix, ‘eigenvalue' and ‘eigenvector', as applied to square matrices, express a matrix in the form QDQ^-1.

What do I need to do? How much of the further pure maths is relevant? Is actuarial maths all about the vectors and matrices, because I don't like vectors and I haven't learned a lot of matrices, as exemplified by the above.

(School said prior statistics knowledge is not required)

Thank you. I hope this is understandable.

-About not taking further maths, it was because it was only A2 - of course now I regret it, but it did not seem like the right choice then, and I wanted to maximise my grades - I was wrong, of course, because A2 further maths would have helped immensely. It's not too late (to catch up before heading to uni?)
*
Frankly, those who took further maths, hv no significant advantage when taking actuarial science. Further maths and actuarial maths are essentially two different field of maths. While further maths may assist you in your degree, without it, you still would be able to cope.
RyukA
post Aug 26 2010, 12:38 PM

On my way
****
Senior Member
612 posts

Joined: Jan 2010


QUOTE(LightningFist @ Aug 25 2010, 05:52 PM)
Haha RyukA you make it sound like it's all quite simple.

I know a lot of posts go up saying actuarial science doesn't have the serious hard kind of straight maths - I like the sound of that, because I am not a hard fan of vectors or trigonometric graphs.

However, looking at all the pure math topics they have, especially matrices and vectors, I kinda go like "Whaaah" cos who the hell likes that stuff anyway.

And mumeichan is telling me one god book will help me. I will definitely check it out after my exams.

Mumeichan are you in a UK school now?

And RyukA how is ANU? Do they have a July intake for Actuarial Science, and is it the same as the Feb intake? I can get in without Further Maths you reckon?
*
EVerything is equally simple yet equally hard.
My experience in this uni is that, every field no matter what u do, there will be challenges ahead.
Law students have to get hold with cases, debate on probational small courts. Engineering students work long time on derivatives, doing projects.
Finance students have to read up corporation issues, market info to prepare for assignment.

The actuarial degree in ANU will be abit of everything in the commercial scope while giving strong emphasis on statistics ( modelings).
The reason why some say Further math is important, is not because of the syllabus covered. But the fact that most of the time,
students that took further math somehow shown that they are keen on Mathematics, have strong analytical skills and good in
solving problems ( as a general assumption).
And to be able to survive this actuarial degree, you need to have all of these.
Like what the post above said, both math is quite different. Of course, if you took further math, you have a slight benefit ahead of others that didnt. But there's no guarantee u will do better. hehe
I didnt take further math, it was quite "hard" in the beginning to catch up, even failed my midsem on the calculus component LMAO last semester. but just work consistently. Got away with a distinction. lol.

Its not high level math that kills in the end, its the statistics. (According to fellow seniors.)


Added on August 26, 2010, 12:44 pmOh, and. Yea, u can get in without further math.Provided you score bloody well for math, and get a high average.
Prerequisites is essential but grade is the priority they seek. As long as the Math you do covers Statistics and calculus.

In ANU, I think its the same like other universities as well. You can take a degree no matter which semester u enrol in.
You get to plan and enrol your courses for each semester. For example certain MATH unit is unavailable for semester 2. So just do some other "required subject", and
do that particular unit at Sem1 next year. Its totally flexible to schedule. The school will also provide recommended plan for students to follow, but feel free to do modifications.

This post has been edited by RyukA: Aug 26 2010, 12:44 PM
LightningFist
post Aug 26 2010, 06:24 PM

Minion of the Damned
Group Icon
VIP
3,965 posts

Joined: Apr 2009
Thanks for all the info guys.

RyukA: I see, TY, so you just switch up the classes and end up the same. Great smile.gif

Well I eyed Actuarial Science a little while back, too bad didn't take Further while I could have. My school Does offer it, and the schools won't be pleased that I didn't take it while I could have.

I like maths and calculus enough. The school says "prior knowledge of statistics is not required". I did S1 and I'm doing M1, didn't do S2. Suppose that doesn't matter then. (M = mechanics). Hope to get A*. But you know how it is, the results come out after application, and ultimately A* is not the requirement, but necessary if they hold. if they "hold" I am lucky, if they don't then ... sad.gif

I feel like I should tell the schools (compulsory personal statement) in my application that I have time from November 2010 till September 2010, and that I want to maybe get a work attachment and take math classes - actuarial stuff. Is that part about classes appropriate at all? They could think I am industrious, but they could think I am not prepared. And I want to make it clear that I am definitely ready, but I want to prep myself for the work ahead. How do I say this? Please help.
RyukA
post Aug 26 2010, 09:38 PM

On my way
****
Senior Member
612 posts

Joined: Jan 2010


QUOTE(LightningFist @ Aug 26 2010, 06:24 PM)
Thanks for all the info guys.

RyukA: I see, TY, so you just switch up the classes and end up the same. Great smile.gif

Well I eyed Actuarial Science a little while back, too bad didn't take Further while I could have. My school Does offer it, and the schools won't be pleased that I didn't take it while I could have.

I like maths and calculus enough. The school says "prior knowledge of statistics is not required". I did S1 and I'm doing M1, didn't do S2. Suppose that doesn't matter then. (M = mechanics). Hope to get A*. But you know how it is, the results come out after application, and ultimately A* is not the requirement, but necessary if they hold. if they "hold" I am lucky, if they don't then ... sad.gif

I feel like I should tell the schools (compulsory personal statement) in my application that I have time from November 2010 till September 2010, and that I want to maybe get a work attachment and take math classes - actuarial stuff. Is that part about classes appropriate at all? They could think I am industrious, but they could think I am not prepared. And I want to make it clear that I am definitely ready, but I want to prep myself for the work ahead. How do I say this? Please help.
*
Do enlighten us,
what courses you are currently taking?
What subject are u currently taking?
What you gonna do next?
What Uni would you be interested to apply to?
LightningFist
post Aug 26 2010, 10:23 PM

Minion of the Damned
Group Icon
VIP
3,965 posts

Joined: Apr 2009
QUOTE(RyukA @ Aug 26 2010, 09:38 PM)
Do enlighten us,
what courses you are currently taking?
What subject are u currently taking?
What you gonna do next?
What Uni would you be interested to apply to?
*
CIE A levels: Maths and the 3 natural sciences.

Applying to Warwick, LSE soon, but because Aussies start 1st in Feb, I'll wait and apply for July. I was told a couple don't give provisional offers based on forecasts while some do.

What am I gonna do next? I hope to first get in for Actuarial Science. People tell me "don't worry you'll get in for sure" but I also keep hearing "you sure you don't need Further".
I know it's not in the entry prereqs and I'm hoping traditional science subjects will complement maths and that'll get me in. I've seen people get in with worse. However the odds do not appeal to applicants, lol, there are few places only.

Will have about 9 months of time. Take a break (which I have not had, cos I joined A levels right after secondary). Get work experience? Only serious thing I have done is an attachment in a law firm, but more on that later.

Was never really sure what to do. Eng? Law? Actuarial? Sure, if I look at any uni material, be it actuarial, engineering, or law, it seems so far-fetched and impossible.

However, I decided since Actuarial Science is equally demanding as Engineering, and though I like "mechanics" in terms of maths, I don't really like the engineering stuff. Statistics and maths are nice enough, and like a lot of people said, Actuarial isn't maths, maths lovers should do maths instead. But I know math-loving-people who go into actuarial science too. Did not like law as much. Thought I would want to do it - because you don't need to have done it before, and you could still do it.

For actuarial, is it that way too? I know an actuarial science class is gonna be competitive. I mean, they will be serious, they will be brilliant, and I have to be ready. I am ready.
All I need is some exposure, that's why I'm keen on finding out what I can do to prepare for it. Not sure if simply looking at past papers helps. Maths classes? I don't even know where to begin.


Added on September 11, 2010, 10:59 pmBy the way guys, I'd like to ask - Which is a better degree to study:

BSc Statistics / MSci Statistical Science

or

BSc Statistics, Economics, and Finance

whether one intends to be an actuary or work in risk management or finance or investment? (both are offered at the same university)

The BSc Statistics has a lot of statistics and maths subjects common to other Actuarial Science courses. I ask this because I have 5 choices and only 1 or 2 of them are called BSc Actuarial Science. I'm not interested in non-applied maths and didn't take further so I won't be applying to any Mathematics courses.

Another university has BSc Actuarial Science and BSc Business Mathematics and Statistics. They said the BSc AS is directed towards actuarial study, although the other BSc many more options in statistics and risk subjects. But I suppose they should be very close.

This post has been edited by LightningFist: Sep 11 2010, 10:59 PM
kwh1989
post Sep 16 2010, 11:46 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
412 posts

Joined: Jul 2005



QUOTE(LightningFist @ Aug 26 2010, 10:23 PM)

Added on September 11, 2010, 10:59 pmBy the way guys, I'd like to ask - Which is a better degree to study:

BSc Statistics / MSci Statistical Science

or

BSc Statistics, Economics, and Finance

whether one intends to be an actuary or work in risk management or finance or investment? (both are offered at the same university)

The BSc Statistics has a lot of statistics and maths subjects common to other Actuarial Science courses. I ask this because I have 5 choices and only 1 or 2 of them are called BSc Actuarial Science. I'm not interested in non-applied maths and didn't take further so I won't be applying to any Mathematics courses.

Another university has BSc Actuarial Science and BSc Business Mathematics and Statistics. They said the BSc AS is directed towards actuarial study, although the other BSc many more options in statistics and risk subjects. But I suppose they should be very close.
*
imo, it depends on ur interest? i met alot of classmates who are very keen in doing maths and stats, but utterly no interest in finance/economics/commerce subjects, they were having a hard time studying for it. if you are really interested in actuarial studies, i would recommend exposing urself to other commerce subjects, instead of just stats. if you like actuary's works, finance will be easy and complement ur set of skills. if you are really good, u might even consider doing CFA together wif ur actuarial core technical papers
C-Note
post Sep 16 2010, 01:04 PM

starry starry night
*******
Senior Member
3,037 posts

Joined: Dec 2007
From: 6-feet under


Apparently I gather there are only about a handful of fully qualified actuarists in Malaysia. How are we going to find jobs in the future? There aren't many insurance companies here and most require only a few for job positions.

Please enlighten me if i'm wrong

thanks
kwh1989
post Sep 20 2010, 02:08 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
412 posts

Joined: Jul 2005



QUOTE(C-Note @ Sep 16 2010, 01:04 PM)
Apparently I gather there are only about a handful of fully qualified actuarists in Malaysia. How are we going to find jobs in the future? There aren't many insurance companies here and most require only a few for job positions.

Please enlighten me if i'm wrong

thanks
*
http://www.bnm.gov.my/index.php?ch=13&cat=insurance

check the link above for list of insurance firms in malaysia. opportunities are there, life insurance, general insurance, reassurance, asset reassurance, and the list goes on. + superannuation as well

in addition, actuary degree no longer is restricted to the traditional field anymore, more firms are employing actuarists for npv analysis, underwriting and risk management, those fields are energy, environment, finance, investment, gambling, wealth management etc

its about what u do with ur degree, not what the degree can do for u
LightningFist
post Sep 20 2010, 03:46 PM

Minion of the Damned
Group Icon
VIP
3,965 posts

Joined: Apr 2009
Statistics, Economics and Finance or Statistics is like a back up for me. Yes, LOL, my "back-up" is UCL. Because I really hope to get into the accredited, exemptions-carrying course.

I don't really like economics thaat much, and I understand actuarial science has a part of it but not the entire thing. Similarly in economics they'll have maths, etc.

I sure hope there are jobs. It's not too bad for fresh graduates but it's just like any other field I suppose? Except physicians which are "in demand"...
zstan
post Sep 20 2010, 03:51 PM

10k Club
********
All Stars
15,856 posts

Joined: Nov 2007
From: Zion



you must understand first....

being an actuary, and and an actuarial science degree graduate are 2 totally different things.
Imperfecion
post Nov 4 2010, 03:27 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
168 posts

Joined: Nov 2010
rclxub.gif I'm currently a Form 5 student from Malaysia opting to take up Ac .Sc. next year.
1)Which pre-uni courses should I take up considering STPM , A-levels , VCE , ADP.
2)What subject best to take.
3)Which uni.
Hikari0307
post Nov 4 2010, 03:45 PM

平成の光
*******
Senior Member
4,541 posts

Joined: Feb 2009
QUOTE(Imperfecion @ Nov 4 2010, 03:27 PM)
rclxub.gif I'm currently a Form 5 student from Malaysia opting to take up Ac .Sc. next year.
1)Which pre-uni courses should I take up considering STPM , A-levels , VCE , ADP.
2)What subject best to take.
3)Which uni.
*
where are you thinking of heading for your Degree?
RyukA
post Nov 4 2010, 05:26 PM

On my way
****
Senior Member
612 posts

Joined: Jan 2010


QUOTE(Imperfecion @ Nov 4 2010, 03:27 PM)
rclxub.gif I'm currently a Form 5 student from Malaysia opting to take up Ac .Sc. next year.
1)Which pre-uni courses should I take up considering STPM , A-levels , VCE , ADP.
2)What subject best to take.
3)Which uni.
*
Let's start by:
Why do you want to be an actuary? or why do you choose an actuarial degree? * to clear some misconception*

Searingmage
post Nov 4 2010, 08:45 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,809 posts

Joined: Feb 2010


QUOTE(RyukA @ Nov 4 2010, 05:26 PM)
Let's start by:
Why do you want to be an actuary? or why do you choose an actuarial degree? * to clear some misconception*
*
Yes, indeed that's the most important thing to ask.
You want to be an actuary because you want it? Or because you would like to jump into the bandwagon?
mumeichan
post Nov 4 2010, 08:47 PM

Member
*******
Senior Member
4,152 posts

Joined: May 2005
QUOTE(RyukA @ Nov 4 2010, 05:26 PM)
Let's start by:
Why do you want to be an actuary? or why do you choose an actuarial degree? * to clear some misconception*
*
I think it's better that he starts by reading all the actuary related threads here first.
Searingmage
post Nov 4 2010, 08:58 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,809 posts

Joined: Feb 2010


QUOTE(mumeichan @ Nov 4 2010, 08:47 PM)
I think it's better that he starts by reading all the actuary related threads here first.
*
His post is too general, so we shouldn't conclude that he hasn't read anything yet. So, a simpler question to know whether he research or not yet is to ask him why he wants to be an actuary..
mumeichan
post Nov 4 2010, 09:09 PM

Member
*******
Senior Member
4,152 posts

Joined: May 2005
QUOTE(Searingmage @ Nov 4 2010, 08:58 PM)
His post is too general, so we shouldn't conclude that he hasn't read anything yet. So, a simpler question to know whether he research or not yet is to ask him why he wants to be an actuary..
*
Well, asking him why he wants to be an actuary is a good question. But I think the answer for his original question has been posted a few time here already and he'll probably find alot of useful info from reading past topic.
Searingmage
post Nov 4 2010, 09:34 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,809 posts

Joined: Feb 2010


QUOTE(mumeichan @ Nov 4 2010, 09:09 PM)
Well, asking him why he wants to be an actuary is a good question. But I think the answer for his original question has been posted a few time here already and he'll probably find alot of useful info from reading past topic.
*
Have to agree with you on that. Most doubts should end after reading the whole thread. So, I do wonder sometimes, how many who ask questions here have actually read all previous post before asking questions..
IcyDarling
post Nov 4 2010, 09:47 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,372 posts

Joined: Sep 2008


gosh it seems like most of my smart friends are persuing for Actuarial Science.

Just wanna ask, if u persue ur studies in AS, what if you cant get the job(i know its mere impossible but what IF)? What else can you work with the diploma?
LightningFist
post Nov 4 2010, 10:19 PM

Minion of the Damned
Group Icon
VIP
3,965 posts

Joined: Apr 2009
If one is serious about a career in actuarial work then a diploma in actuarial science is highly unlikely (even if it's a postgrad diploma, which I doubt you are referring to, unless are referring to a degree).

It's merely impossible to get the job? There are hundreds of actuarial science graduates around the world, a job is not that easy to get, places are not high and competition is stiff.
IcyDarling
post Nov 4 2010, 10:25 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,372 posts

Joined: Sep 2008


QUOTE(LightningFist @ Nov 4 2010, 11:19 PM)
If one is serious about a career in actuarial work then a diploma in actuarial science is highly unlikely (even if it's a postgrad diploma, which I doubt you are referring to, unless are referring to a degree).

It's merely impossible to get the job? There are hundreds of actuarial science graduates around the world, a job is not that easy to get, places are not high and competition is stiff.
*
huh? I heard from my friends that its a job high in demand now. Coz in Malaysia not much actuarial science grads. A lot of company hire from oversea but they'll prefer locals
Hikari0307
post Nov 4 2010, 10:33 PM

平成の光
*******
Senior Member
4,541 posts

Joined: Feb 2009
QUOTE(IcyDarling @ Nov 4 2010, 10:25 PM)
huh? I heard from my friends that its a job high in demand now. Coz in Malaysia not much actuarial science grads. A lot of company hire from oversea but they'll prefer locals
*
there's a lot of actuarial science graduate nowadays. The ones that are a bit more lesser are those who have passed all the professional papers and you don't have to graduate from an AS degree to take those papers.
LightningFist
post Nov 4 2010, 10:59 PM

Minion of the Damned
Group Icon
VIP
3,965 posts

Joined: Apr 2009
Well when I said "job" it includes everything, i.e. trainee positions, associate positions, and higher positions. A job in this specific field does not come by easily.

I think it was mentioned that there are only ~50 fully qualified actuaries working in Malaysia. And it's not certain whether they are Associates or Fellows, with the ASM or otherwise.

How many actuarial science graduates there are in Malaysia, I would not know.

Are your friends actuarial science students? Are they employed?
RyukA
post Nov 5 2010, 05:31 AM

On my way
****
Senior Member
612 posts

Joined: Jan 2010


QUOTE(IcyDarling @ Nov 4 2010, 09:47 PM)
gosh it seems like most of my smart friends are persuing for Actuarial Science.

Just wanna ask, if u persue ur studies in AS, what if you cant get the job(i know its mere impossible but what IF)? What else can you work with the diploma?
*
I hope I dont scare you with the insights.

Having an actuarial degree and working as an actuary is two different thing.
But of course, most of us that take an AS degree plan to work as an actuary.

Not to be harsh or demotivating, if most of your friends pursue Actuarial Science because:
1) a degree for smart people
2) lots of people seem to be into that field
3) the money
4) a course for high IQ (i lol'ed, but i heard that somewhere)

Then for obvious reason, 60%-70% of your friends may :
switch out, finish but not work as one, got frustrated.
It is like, not all students that are good in Biology can do medicine, or "have the attitude" to become a doctor.

I have seen much smarter students that love math, end up doing lot better it Engineering and computer science,
which involves alot of "fun" and "challenging" math as well.


Alright, to answer your question now,
it is VERY LIKELY when you graduate, you cant get a job.
In malaysia, the concept of Actuarial is not established yet, rather very new due to its hot demand.
Unlike, doctors and lawyers, where the demand in job market always runs a deficit. back home, only very established Insurance, re-insurance and
financial companies would hire actuaries.
So, unless you do well in your studies, PUT IN SELF-EFFORT to job hunt, participate vocational programs, and try to pass most of your "professional" exam,
it is unlikely you get a effortless employment.

I am not sure bout Diploma in AS ( even if I do a little, well I better not say anything bout it)
an AS degree is much wide in terms of coverage, for different professional board there will be different point within the syllabus to emphasis
Since my program is based on Institute of Actuaries Aus, an Aus AS degree will be a well blend of Economics, Business, Finance, and Statistics. ( gawd, I dunno repeat berapa kali dah)

Which means, if you fail to cope up, or you realise you dont like it, you can switch easily to one of these disciplines (degree) and put ur Credit points(studies courses) into use.
So, lets say u graduate with a degree in AS, u can work in fields related to Insurance, risk management, public management, financial sectors, investing, and statistics-related disciplines.
But, working as an qualified actuary will adapt large responsibility because if you approve a wrong model, the whole firm/insurance market might face huge consequences, thats why
its stressful as a career although the reward is high. yet, the climbing process is tiring, having to sit through many professional exams and years of studies.

That explain its low number of qualified actuaries world wide. but according to Senior actuaries from firms, they believe this trend will grow because now Actuarial Science are diversifying as more and more
commercial field import the use of actuaries, which is a good sign for us.

Feel free to ask ( after reading previous posts =.= )

Searingmage
post Nov 5 2010, 01:05 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,809 posts

Joined: Feb 2010


QUOTE(LightningFist @ Nov 4 2010, 10:59 PM)
Well when I said "job" it includes everything, i.e. trainee positions, associate positions, and higher positions. A job in this specific field does not come by easily.

I think it was mentioned that there are only ~50 fully qualified actuaries working in Malaysia. And it's not certain whether they are Associates or Fellows, with the ASM or otherwise.

How many actuarial science graduates there are in Malaysia, I would not know.

Are your friends actuarial science students? Are they employed?
*
There are actually around 60 fully qualified actuary in Malaysia. And there are MANY that are nearly fellows. Oh, qualified means fellows, not associates.
Btw, what does ASM mean in your context?
xzjasonzx
post Nov 5 2010, 02:24 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
234 posts

Joined: Jun 2009
Is there other jobs besides actuarial-related jobs that a actuarial graduate can do? Like many of engineering graduate end up teaching or stuff like that?

QUOTE(Searingmage @ Nov 4 2010, 09:34 PM)
Have to agree with you on that. Most doubts should end after reading the whole thread. So, I do wonder sometimes, how many who ask questions here have actually read all previous post before asking questions..
*
Either the thread is too long or, in this case (actuarial), there are too many threads so the information are scattered all over.

I always wonder too, are most people that want to study actuarial merely attracted by millions of dollar they would make in the future than interest itself IF they pulled through? I mean like, those who loves maths do a degree in maths or statistics would normally end up in doing jobs with average pay, and here comes actuarial that promises millions for them, who wouldn't want to study it? Basically, capitallism means MONEY.

This post has been edited by xzjasonzx: Nov 5 2010, 02:29 PM
LightningFist
post Nov 5 2010, 02:57 PM

Minion of the Damned
Group Icon
VIP
3,965 posts

Joined: Apr 2009
Ok, so the number grew. I said "around 50" because around this year this information was still published occasionally. Of course I can't keep track of the number of people.

Technically an associate is "qualified", just not as qualified as a fellow.

ASM = Actuarial Society of Malaysia. If these actuaries, fellows or associates, are practicing in Msia, they would most likely be registered or affiliated with the ASM and/or one or more internationally recognised institutes.


Added on November 5, 2010, 3:03 pmThere is no such thing as a promise of millions. An actuary is most likely not self-employed, and he/she will work for a company at a salary. There may not be as many opportunities for big bonuses, as say, a trader. Furthermore, as RyukA has detailed, the risks are inherent, and an immense level of commitment is needed.

It is clear that is it already quite difficult for an entry level worker / student to break into the field. If that was not enough of an impediment, you have competition from not only actuarial science graduates but math graduates, economics graduates, engineering graduates, statistics graduates, physics graduates etc.

This post has been edited by LightningFist: Nov 5 2010, 03:03 PM
Imperfecion
post Nov 5 2010, 04:53 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
168 posts

Joined: Nov 2010
Well, I looked through many courses and subjects related to Actuarial Sc. just got my attention Economics , Computers , Calculations . Adding on, job prospect seems healthy and it's rated one of the best job.

"The drop out rate is high."

Read that plenty of times. As far as I comprehend it is hard due to the intensive course and poor time management. Some find the course boring.

There is a rumour stating that Ac. Sc. is reserved only for top students. How true is it?

If I'm less confident with Ac. Sc. should i take up A-levels instead?


Check out :HELP CO-OP

What you you guys think about the programme above?



P.S. I've seen Hikari0307 and Mumeichan active on Ac. Sc. treads. Are both of you doing Ac. Sc. as well?

This post has been edited by Imperfecion: Nov 5 2010, 04:58 PM
LightningFist
post Nov 5 2010, 06:57 PM

Minion of the Damned
Group Icon
VIP
3,965 posts

Joined: Apr 2009
It is inadvisable to do a below-undergrad level diploma or foundation for actuarial science unless you are 100% certain that you both want to do it and will secure a position for further study .

What do you mean it is reserved? In education, selective courses usually only admit capable students. Some elitist institutions do tend to admit students with less than the expected qualifications, based on connections, money etc, but this is something that is not openly disclosed, and such things are not commonplace.

If you look at it as "reserved", top schools will only admit the best applicants to their classes, as places are limited. If there are extra places (this happens rarely), they'll still admit students. If it is oversubscribed, they'll select those they think are the best. You cannot make reservations, but you can make yourself eligible for consideration.
Searingmage
post Nov 5 2010, 08:23 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,809 posts

Joined: Feb 2010


QUOTE(xzjasonzx @ Nov 5 2010, 02:24 PM)
Is there other jobs besides actuarial-related jobs that a actuarial graduate can do? Like many of engineering graduate end up teaching or stuff like that?
Either the thread is too long or, in this case (actuarial), there are too many threads so the information are scattered all over.

I always wonder too, are most people that want to study actuarial merely attracted by millions of dollar they would make in the future than interest itself IF they pulled through? I mean like, those who loves maths do  a degree in maths or statistics would normally end up in doing jobs with average pay, and here comes actuarial that promises millions for them, who wouldn't want to study it? Basically, capitallism means MONEY.
*
Yes, finance stuffs are closely related to actuarial graduates. There are many who went into finance/econs firms instead of actuary firms.
If just because the thread is too long, they're lazy to read, then that shows how much interest they have on actuarial science.

Actuarial Science won't promise millions. In fact, there are many other jobs which may have higher pay than actuarial science. Also, those who loves maths may not love actuarial mathematics. They are generally different from pure maths. There will be some relevant stuffs with statistics but they are essentially still different.
Actually, taking actuarial science course is a risk. Its a very specific course unlike courses like business management, mathematics etc. However, most university manage this by diversifying some subjects to econs and finance so that those who don't like actuarial science may still have job opportunity in other fields.
Hikari0307
post Nov 5 2010, 11:04 PM

平成の光
*******
Senior Member
4,541 posts

Joined: Feb 2009
QUOTE(xzjasonzx @ Nov 5 2010, 02:24 PM)
Is there other jobs besides actuarial-related jobs that a actuarial graduate can do? Like many of engineering graduate end up teaching or stuff like that?
Either the thread is too long or, in this case (actuarial), there are too many threads so the information are scattered all over.
Of course AS graduates can always go to work in other fields like Marketing,banks etc. etc.
Like previously said before there are a lot of AS graduates who end up not becoming actuaries because of several reasons and they go and do a whole range of other jobs.

QUOTE(Imperfecion @ Nov 5 2010, 04:53 PM)
P.S. I've seen Hikari0307 and Mumeichan active on Ac. Sc. treads. Are both of you doing Ac. Sc. as well?
*
no I'm a Finance and Asian Studies student.
zeeyang
post Nov 6 2010, 12:06 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
128 posts

Joined: Oct 2010


IMHO if you love maths you should go for engineering. This is where you would apply your maths into fun and challenging tasks like calculating how much pressure can your building structures withstand.

Actuaries deal with risks about peoples and I must say it's extremely boring (for me at least). Be prepared to sit for long hours in front of a computer looking at long list of statistics about peoples.

If you are opting for actuarial science because of the maths then a maths degree would be a better option for you. Actuaries only use simple maths when they work. They are trained by all those vigorous maths because they need a HIGH accuracy for their results as it is vital for the company. And be warned, even if you are applying maths, it's won't be as fun as what usual maths would provide.

Example of work of actuaries --> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Excerpt_...003_Table_1.png
RyukA
post Nov 6 2010, 01:05 AM

On my way
****
Senior Member
612 posts

Joined: Jan 2010


QUOTE(zeeyang @ Nov 6 2010, 12:06 AM)
IMHO if you love maths you should go for engineering. This is where you would apply your maths into fun and challenging tasks like calculating how much pressure can your building structures withstand.

Actuaries deal with risks about peoples and I must say it's extremely boring (for me at least). Be prepared to sit for long hours in front of a computer looking at long list of statistics about peoples.

If you are opting for actuarial science because of the maths then a maths degree would be a better option for you. Actuaries only use simple maths when they work. They are trained by all those vigorous maths because they need a HIGH accuracy for their results as it is vital for the company. And be warned, even if you are applying maths, it's won't be as fun as what usual maths would provide.

Example of work of actuaries --> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Excerpt_...003_Table_1.png
*
Yes. It does get very dry.
Those are just Life contigencies, part of the sylabus in AS.
This is the point of a 'statistic" which defines the study on a collection of a range of data. Working on stat can be boring but through stat this is how we study
Behaviour, and then the associated risk.

Of course, in working life there's lots of externalities that differ how a conventional working environment should be.
I do agree that people that look math dont exactly fit into AS, but then different people have different interest, even within math, some people
just loves statistics, some people hate calculus, some people cant understand algorithms, or cant live without algebra.
So I believe its bout finding the right job with the right interest than ranking these fields with distinct level of benefits.

Since it is very unlikely a professional engineer at work ever experience the working life of an actuary and vice versa.
I find it inappropriate for one to compare the working life of both fields, when one actually never/havn't experienced both.
By definition of simple math, everyone interprets it differently for its difficulty.
During conference with firms, we have came across lots of different type of actuaries, those working with Insurance firms with have different insight with those doing re-insurance , and investment.
There are actuaries that deal alot with accountants on capitalisation, and there are those that deal alot with gov. officials, pension schemes.

So even within the field, there's a well diversified range of skills to be applied on different environments. hence, a generalization of such would be unfair to
students on this thread that actually have the intention to see the world of AS before deciding.


*I have no intension to comment on your judgement of AS, but I do like to clarify certain point that may be misleading.

LightningFist
post Nov 6 2010, 01:20 AM

Minion of the Damned
Group Icon
VIP
3,965 posts

Joined: Apr 2009
Imperfecion, perhaps you should experience a period in an insurance company? Though that may not give you insight into what you might actually study later on, it would grant you a rough idea of the kind of work they do.
Cristiano-Ronaldo-7
post Nov 6 2010, 02:55 AM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,396 posts

Joined: Sep 2004
like all great professions. it takes alot of hardwork and dedication to get to where we want to be at. same goes with any discipline.

some how i see some investment banker coming in giving out all the negative and hard work that goes into investment banking. however it is true, in some ways. everyone wants to be in investment banking now a days.
gomes.
post Nov 6 2010, 05:17 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
361 posts

Joined: Dec 2006


alot of people with actuarial science degrees (speaking mainly for UK based degrees, e.g. LSE) dont necessarily became actuarists. they just work in the financial sector, like in a bank or something, but not related to actuarial. so with an actuarial science degree you can get a job in the financial sector, like analyst/graduate programme in banks etc. thats what quite a number of people with actuarial science degrees from the UK do
LightningFist
post Nov 6 2010, 01:32 PM

Minion of the Damned
Group Icon
VIP
3,965 posts

Joined: Apr 2009
You mean actuary smile.gif

QUOTE(Cristiano-Ronaldo-7 @ Nov 6 2010, 02:55 AM)
like all great professions. it takes alot of hardwork and dedication to get to where we want to be at. same goes with any discipline.

some how i see some investment banker coming in giving out all the negative and hard work that goes into investment banking. however it is true, in some ways. everyone wants to be in investment banking now a days.
*
Not everyone wants to be in investment banking. For some people the hours are too long, the job is not as stable, the stress is too great. While others may like it.
But it's not like they look for specific degrees anyway. Anyhow the major IBs overseas have freezed hiring, and a lot of inexperienced/less esperienced people get laid off.

Gomes do you work in that industry (banking or finance), just out of curiosity?
RyukA
post Nov 7 2010, 09:29 AM

On my way
****
Senior Member
612 posts

Joined: Jan 2010


QUOTE(gomes. @ Nov 6 2010, 05:17 AM)
alot of people with actuarial science degrees (speaking mainly for UK based degrees, e.g. LSE) dont necessarily became actuarists. they just work in the financial sector, like in a bank or something, but not related to actuarial. so with an actuarial science degree you can get a job in the financial sector, like analyst/graduate programme in banks etc. thats what quite a number of people with actuarial science degrees from the UK do
*
the concept of "actuaries" is different for now than years ago.
your term of "actuary" as intepreted, most probably the traditional actuaries, which are both "life actuaries" and "casualty actuaries" which work closely to insurance related firms.
As I said earlier, the field is now diversified to other commercial context.
As long as there's risk, and there's a way to play with that risk, then you can expect an actuary will be needed to play the role.

Actuary is more of a qualification than a career. One with actuarial skills, work as a senior director in firms, an actuarial researcher,
actuarial analyst, Financial advisor, consultant, liquidator and much more, but the fact they are still called a 'qualified actuary', is not because of their career,
but their professional qualfication at the level of FIA (fellowship).

*just to update, 2010 Feb: Institute of Actuaries (Aus & UK), revise the definition of "actuary" to cover both Associates and Fellows, rather than just Fellows.
So, in a verbal context, it is differentiated as Junior Actuaries ( part I completion), and Senior Actuaries ( AIA, FIA)
Searingmage
post Nov 9 2010, 12:12 AM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,809 posts

Joined: Feb 2010


QUOTE(RyukA @ Nov 7 2010, 09:29 AM)
the concept of "actuaries" is different for now than years ago.
your term of "actuary" as intepreted, most probably the traditional actuaries, which are both "life actuaries" and "casualty actuaries" which work closely to insurance related firms.
As I said earlier, the field is now diversified to other commercial context.
As long as there's risk, and there's a way to play with that risk, then you can expect an actuary will be needed to play the role.

Actuary is more of a qualification than a career. One with actuarial skills, work as a senior director in firms, an actuarial researcher,
actuarial analyst, Financial advisor, consultant, liquidator and much more, but the fact they are still called a 'qualified actuary', is not because of their career,
but their professional qualfication at the level of FIA (fellowship).

*just to update, 2010 Feb: Institute of Actuaries (Aus & UK), revise the definition of "actuary" to cover both Associates and Fellows, rather than just Fellows.
So, in a verbal context, it is differentiated as Junior Actuaries ( part I completion), and Senior Actuaries ( AIA, FIA)
*
Hmm, I believe he meant those that completed the degree but did not take professional papers? Hence, they are not called actuary if that's the case, no?
RyukA
post Nov 9 2010, 04:51 AM

On my way
****
Senior Member
612 posts

Joined: Jan 2010


QUOTE(Searingmage @ Nov 9 2010, 12:12 AM)
Hmm, I believe he meant those that completed the degree but did not take professional papers? Hence, they are not called actuary if that's the case, no?
*
That depends. If these people finished their degree, took professional papers and left the industry for other commercial field,
they are still (qualified) actuaries.
If there are people that got the degree, but didn't take professional papers (yet), however work as analyst in insurance firms, they
are still "actuarial analyst", but not professional actuaries by title. means they are not qualified to approve projects and figures (yet).

If there are people that finish their degree, but didn't work as anywhere related to the industry nor advanced in studying the further papers,
they are not actuaries. Clear nuff.
LightningFist
post Nov 11 2010, 05:55 PM

Minion of the Damned
Group Icon
VIP
3,965 posts

Joined: Apr 2009
An actuarial degree is irrelevant. You are an actuary if you work or worked as an actuary, and to work as one you have to be qualified, either as an Associate or Fellow (in the UK), or elsewhere.

To be a new Associate of the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries (The Actuarial Profession) you need to:

- Have passed or be exempted for all 9 CT papers
- Have passed or be exempted for all 3 CA papers
- Complete one year's worth of work-based skills in the four key dimensions of practical application of actuarial skills, professional and ethical, communication and commercial.
- Attend a one-day professionalism course for Associates

To be a new Fellow you need to:

- Have passed or be exempted from any 2 (in one case 3) ST papers
- Have passed 1 SA paper
- Fulfill the work-based skills requirement (includes 3 years supervised actuarial work)
- Attend a two-day professionalism course within 12 months of being admitted as a Fellow

RyukA
post Nov 11 2010, 07:07 PM

On my way
****
Senior Member
612 posts

Joined: Jan 2010


QUOTE(LightningFist @ Nov 11 2010, 05:55 PM)
An actuarial degree is irrelevant. You are an actuary if you work or worked as an actuary, and to work as one you have to be qualified, either as an Associate or Fellow (in the UK), or elsewhere.

To be a new Associate of the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries (The Actuarial Profession) you need to:

- Have passed or be exempted for all 9 CT papers
- Have passed or be exempted for all 3 CA papers
- Complete one year's worth of work-based skills in the four key dimensions of practical application of actuarial skills, professional and ethical, communication and commercial.
- Attend a one-day professionalism course for Associates

To be a new Fellow you need to:

- Have passed or be exempted from any 2 (in one case 3) ST papers
- Have passed 1 SA paper
- Fulfill the work-based skills requirement (includes 3 years supervised actuarial work)
- Attend a two-day professionalism course within 12 months of being admitted as a Fellow
*
Irrelevant for the status, but relevant for the exposure.
LutherTeh
post Nov 21 2010, 05:12 PM

New Member
*
Newbie
2 posts

Joined: Nov 2010
Hello guys, regard to the actuarial exam.

how can a non-actuarial student sitting for the preliminary exam ?(ex. the CT1-8 paper)
(i am an under-graduated engineering student and interested in actuarial field, plan to develop my future career in actuaries)

the exam will be held local or oversea ? where can i start in order to sitting for the exam? any requirement


thanks for the help smile.gif


LightningFist
post Nov 21 2010, 08:09 PM

Minion of the Damned
Group Icon
VIP
3,965 posts

Joined: Apr 2009
Anyone anywhere may take the exams, preliminary or otherwise.

I believe you are eligible for a discounted rate as well.

I believe it can be held here. Just check the website and register through them after confirming the details.
Searingmage
post Nov 23 2010, 01:14 AM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,809 posts

Joined: Feb 2010


QUOTE(LutherTeh @ Nov 21 2010, 05:12 PM)
Hello guys, regard to the actuarial exam.

how can a non-actuarial student sitting for the preliminary exam ?(ex. the CT1-8 paper)
(i am an under-graduated engineering student and interested in actuarial field, plan to develop my future career in actuaries)

the exam will be held local or oversea ? where can i start in order to sitting for the exam? any requirement
thanks for the help smile.gif
*
You are interested in FIA or SOA?
If SoA, you can send me a pm and I can brief you.. FIA can't help, sry..
PowerScout
post Dec 20 2010, 09:40 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
5 posts

Joined: Dec 2010
I'm new here : ) May I ask when can one start to take actuarial exam ?
mumeichan
post Dec 20 2010, 10:07 PM

Member
*******
Senior Member
4,152 posts

Joined: May 2005
QUOTE(PowerScout @ Dec 20 2010, 09:40 PM)
I'm new here : ) May I ask when can one start to take actuarial exam ?
*
Whenever he wants to. Buy the book, study, take exam.
Silencer90
post Dec 20 2010, 10:50 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
37 posts

Joined: Dec 2010


QUOTE(PowerScout @ Dec 20 2010, 09:40 PM)
I'm new here : ) May I ask when can one start to take actuarial exam ?
*
First, register as a member of one of the international actuarial society (SOA, CAS, CIA, IOA, etc.)

Once you are officially registered as the member, only then you can take the exam administered by that specific actuarial society.
Different actuarial society has its own syllabus. So, make sure that you know their respective series of professional exams before registering.

Try to check it out here:
Society of Actuaries
Casualty Actuarial Society
Institute of Actuaries




uowi
post Dec 21 2010, 01:09 AM

New Member
*
Junior Member
17 posts

Joined: Nov 2010
QUOTE(mumeichan @ Dec 20 2010, 10:07 PM)
Whenever he wants to. Buy the book, study, take exam.
*
Any idea where can i get the list of books to study?

mumeichan
post Dec 21 2010, 01:38 AM

Member
*******
Senior Member
4,152 posts

Joined: May 2005
QUOTE(uowi @ Dec 21 2010, 01:09 AM)
Any idea where can i get the list of books to study?
*
What's your level, which exam do you want to take? There is no 'list of books' actually. One or two companies do produce prep books, but for self study, you'll need a more comprehensive textbooks.
uowi
post Dec 21 2010, 03:41 AM

New Member
*
Junior Member
17 posts

Joined: Nov 2010
I not in actuary field actually, just planning to start to walk on this road. Just wondering where to start with. Planning to take papers later without entering the actuarial science degree.
RyukA
post Dec 21 2010, 09:25 AM

On my way
****
Senior Member
612 posts

Joined: Jan 2010


QUOTE(uowi @ Dec 21 2010, 03:41 AM)
I not in actuary field actually, just planning to start to walk on this road. Just wondering where to start with. Planning to take papers later without entering the actuarial science degree.
*
LOL. good luck with that.
I have heard so many cases where Actuarial science grads cant even handle the exams.
I like that attitude. Nice!!!! hhahahaa
mumeichan
post Dec 21 2010, 09:35 AM

Member
*******
Senior Member
4,152 posts

Joined: May 2005
QUOTE(uowi @ Dec 21 2010, 03:41 AM)
I not in actuary field actually, just planning to start to walk on this road. Just wondering where to start with. Planning to take papers later without entering the actuarial science degree.
*
I don't know how much math you've already studied. But I think to get started get this book, A First Course in Probability by Sheldon Ross. It covers the basics you will need for the Probability actuarial paper. And whatever you can't understand from just reading the book, google it up, that's what I'm doing.
trapezohedron13
post Dec 22 2010, 10:42 AM

Enthusiast
*****
Junior Member
703 posts

Joined: Jun 2010
From: Kuala Lumpur
oh, the textbooks are really... sad.gif
RyukA
post Dec 22 2010, 12:07 PM

On my way
****
Senior Member
612 posts

Joined: Jan 2010




For the textbooks, I would recommend a seperate book for each underlying chapter within syllabus.
Saying that, get a book individually for Poisson processes, Stochastic processes, Credibility theories, risk theories
and on topics related to Actuarial Technique.
Since most of the Actuarial exams ( no matter which board) covers topic in a generally wide scope, so its best
to understand a particular theory/concept at its root and learn how it is put into practise on real life application.

Since purchasing recommended/prescribed textbooks is highly encouraged, I would also like to advise that you purchase books on specific actuarial topics for supplementary reading. And browse through the net for Actuarial research papers (most of it is not easy to understand, but still comprehensive enough to give u an idea).

perhaps this advise is only practical after u done the basic coverage exams. but still its always good to start early.
Start with bunch of Calculus & Probability materials.

good luck

This post has been edited by RyukA: Dec 22 2010, 12:07 PM
trapezohedron13
post Dec 22 2010, 10:49 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Junior Member
703 posts

Joined: Jun 2010
From: Kuala Lumpur
If you're intending to do research or continue with masters and doctorate for actuarial studies, then the textbooks are relevant. Otherwise if you are just studying for exams, dont even bother the text books. Go for the study manuals which only teach u what you need for the exam, and plenty of practice problems. Straight to the point and guaranteed to pass your exams if you can do all the practice exams (and understand them!). Of course this is only true for the preliminary papers. For the further papers, much reading, comprehension and self-study is required.
Nitha_2215
post Jan 2 2011, 09:47 PM

New Member
*
Newbie
1 posts

Joined: Jan 2011
QUOTE(zstan @ Aug 17 2010, 11:02 PM)
AS is available 4 + 0 in Utar and UCSI..
*
can i knw is ucsi degree in actuarial science is recognised?
because i dont see this course in PTPTN website.


Added on January 2, 2011, 9:48 pm
QUOTE(zstan @ Aug 17 2010, 11:02 PM)
AS is available 4 + 0 in Utar and UCSI..
*
can i knw is ucsi degree in actuarial science is recognised?
because i dont see this course in PTPTN website.


Added on January 2, 2011, 9:52 pmi wana know is ucsi actuarial science recognised by ptptn?

This post has been edited by Nitha_2215: Jan 2 2011, 09:52 PM
contingency
post Jan 9 2011, 06:54 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
8 posts

Joined: Jan 2011
Bump
veger_leong
post Feb 14 2011, 01:16 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
86 posts

Joined: Dec 2008


I just want to know what's so important about the Actuary professional paper like SOA?
like example ACCA/CPA is important due to Accountant need to have the qualification to sign the account, if they dont have the qualification of ACCA/CPA they will not be able to sign the account.
CFA which is just a sign to people that the holder has the investment and finance knowledge but no certain post of job/career which stated down CFA is a must. Which CFA migh just give u higher chance for applying certain post.
In these two case we know the different between CFA and ACCA/CPA, to be a accountant ACCA is a must.
So I would like to know SOA is more like CFA? or ACCA? in term of the importance.

Second, I'm 28 years old now I was graduated from Bsc Econ (which degree has exemption for the SOA VEE exam) and lately I wanted to be a actuary and I took SOA exam p and passed it then I started to look for some actuary related job but sadly...not much for entry level, Is that anyone can tell me that am I too old to get into this field? or I should pass few more paper only it will be higher chance for me to get in this field?


ponomariov
post Feb 14 2011, 01:25 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
432 posts

Joined: Feb 2006


QUOTE(veger_leong @ Feb 14 2011, 01:16 PM)
I just want to know what's so important about the Actuary professional paper like SOA?
like example ACCA/CPA is important due to Accountant need to have the qualification to sign the account, if they dont have the qualification of ACCA/CPA they will not be able to sign the account.
CFA which is just a sign to people that the holder has the investment and finance knowledge but no certain post of job/career which stated down CFA is a must. Which CFA migh just give u higher chance for applying certain post.
In these two case we know the different between CFA and ACCA/CPA, to be a accountant ACCA is a must.
So I would like to know SOA is more like CFA? or ACCA? in term of the importance.

Second, I'm 28 years old now I was graduated from Bsc Econ (which degree has exemption for the SOA VEE exam) and lately I wanted to be a actuary and I took SOA exam p and passed it then I started to look for some actuary related job but sadly...not much for entry level, Is that anyone can tell me that am I too old to get into this field? or I should pass few more paper only it will be higher chance for me to get in this field?
*
Why ACCA is most recognised qualification ?

First you need to work 3 years in related field to qualify.
not qualify to take but qualified as an account

Now you jump the gun..

you have papers with no qualification.
28 is not too old. the thing is ,could you accept a fresh grad pay?

Then you are in cross road.

1. I have other experience and education . they should take me

Why this thinking is wrong ?

You have experience in what ppl need and just basic education. Hiring a fresh grad is cheaper and more secure investment.

2. I won't take a pay cut.

Some ppl get lucky .. some ppl don't .. normal you jump industry you reset experience

3. If you are 28 and have no working experience. you better have a master in hand. otherwise there is not explanation why you are so late graduating.

veger_leong
post Feb 14 2011, 02:44 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
86 posts

Joined: Dec 2008


QUOTE(ponomariov @ Feb 14 2011, 01:25 PM)
Why ACCA is most recognised qualification ?

First you need to work 3 years in related field to qualify.
not qualify to take but qualified as an account

Now you jump the gun..

you have papers with no qualification.
28 is not too old. the thing is ,could you accept a fresh grad pay?

Then you are in cross road.

1. I have other experience and education . they should take me

Why this thinking is wrong ?

You have experience in what ppl need and just basic education. Hiring a fresh grad is cheaper and more secure investment.

2. I won't take a pay cut.

Some ppl get lucky .. some ppl don't .. normal you jump industry you reset experience

3. If you are 28 and have no working experience. you better have a master in hand. otherwise there is not explanation why you are so late graduating.
*
To be honest if i can get into this field I dont mind pay cut but u remind me maybe i should adjust the expected salary to lower level
I have working experience I used to be econ analyst and currently Im working as a research and credit analyst But still I rarely see opening for actuarial entry level...

This post has been edited by veger_leong: Feb 14 2011, 02:46 PM
fino_abama
post Feb 17 2011, 10:45 PM

On my way
****
Senior Member
520 posts

Joined: Sep 2009


QUOTE(veger_leong @ Feb 14 2011, 02:44 PM)
To be honest if i can get into this field I dont mind pay cut but u remind me maybe i should adjust the expected salary to lower level
I have working experience I used to be econ analyst and currently Im working as a research and credit analyst But still I rarely see opening for actuarial entry level...
*
Are you just looking at job sites for openings? Companies seldom update their website regarding careers. Take initiative to cold call the HR of the company you're intending to work for. Send in your resume and try to apply even if there are no openings.
SRLee
post Feb 25 2011, 12:28 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
437 posts

Joined: Oct 2009


I love to calculate probability.

I often calculate the probability of many different things in life (useful or not).

How could I get a "taste" of what is actuarial science?
RyukA
post Feb 25 2011, 06:03 PM

On my way
****
Senior Member
612 posts

Joined: Jan 2010


QUOTE(SRLee @ Feb 25 2011, 12:28 PM)
I love to calculate probability.

I often calculate the probability of many different things in life (useful or not).

How could I get a "taste" of what is actuarial science?
*
loving probability is just the start, and barely enough.
Of course, instead of dealing with Numbers. the way we learn sorts of probability theory will be through
matrices, algebra and alot of Set theories, using A,B,C,D to learn the underlying logic.
Financial math must be your love, as what you learn in math, will be substituted with Interest rate and numbers with high S.F.
and subsequent financial modelling. This comprise a very tough time handling sorts of weird cash flows.

when Probability meets these Cash flows, u get financial uncertainty, which explains risk, arising studies in investment strategy,
going through Continuous time finance, which have sh*t loads of stochastics in it, which can be said a "probability sample space" at its worst.

Survival model give u taste of what traditional actuaries do, scrolling through life mortality tables, and make insurance decisions, upon payoff, and project further evaluations.

that would be the very brief taste of AS. if you cant handle Mathematic theories ( doing proves, explaining theories, instead of just advanced calculations),
dont take it.
probability is just too hard to describe, as probability is the root in high level statistics, try looking through advanced statistics, and decide whether probability is really ur cup of tea, if not you will really really really have a very bad time in it.

Finance is perhaps where Actuarial Studies is highly applied on in Australia (IAA), not sure with the emphasis in other boards. It requires an interest in learning stocks, shares, markets, Interest rate calculations, and invesment strategies. If you find those boring, AS might be a very boring subject for you. Do think carefully.


Do go online and do more research upon deciding whether AS is suitable for you. Ask if in doubt wink.gif
lostintransition
post Mar 4 2011, 02:51 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
106 posts

Joined: Oct 2009
Hi All,
Just looking for some advice from "sifus" here......

I am a fully qualified accountant (ACCA UK) and is looking for sort of like a career change from accounting to finance field. If, and say if, I choose to do actuarial science, is it advisable to attempt a "teaser" paper first rather than diving in like a Rambo and get myself killed for nothing?

The Institute of Actuaries (UK) allow the public to do CT1 without the commitment of being a member. I believe it maybe a good idea to attempt paper CT1 Financial Mathematics just to test the water.

What if I pass the paper and seem to like it? Is it any indicators that I should proceed and do CT2 to CT8? Or just passing CT1 is too early to tell?

By the way, I am just planning to do self study and via correspondence course with BPP (Actuarial Science Training provider company). Experience wise... sadly, I am working for an MNC (manufacturing) in Penang and therefore is devoid of finance exposure.

Or maybe I am being too naive? That it is better for me to do CFA Level 1 instead? And what is the difference between CFA versus the actuarial exams? Noted that alot of actuarial graduates (actuaries wannabe) end up doing CFA instead.

Thanks in advance...Any feedback, no matter how crude is always welcome.
RyukA
post Mar 4 2011, 09:42 PM

On my way
****
Senior Member
612 posts

Joined: Jan 2010


QUOTE(lostintransition @ Mar 4 2011, 02:51 PM)
Hi All,
Just looking for some advice from "sifus" here......

I am a fully qualified accountant (ACCA UK) and is looking for sort of like a career change from accounting to finance field. If, and say if, I choose to do actuarial science, is it advisable to attempt a "teaser" paper first rather than diving in like a Rambo and get myself killed for nothing?

The Institute of Actuaries (UK) allow the public to do CT1 without the commitment of being a member. I believe it maybe a good idea to attempt paper CT1 Financial Mathematics just to test the water.

What if I pass the paper and seem to like it? Is it any indicators that I should proceed and do CT2 to CT8? Or just passing CT1 is too early to tell?

By the way, I am just planning to do self study and via correspondence course with BPP (Actuarial Science Training provider company). Experience wise... sadly, I am working for an MNC (manufacturing) in Penang and therefore is devoid of finance exposure.

Or maybe I am being too naive? That it is better for me to do CFA Level 1 instead? And what is the difference between CFA versus the actuarial exams? Noted that alot of actuarial graduates (actuaries wannabe) end up doing CFA instead.

Thanks in advance...Any feedback, no matter how crude is always welcome.
*
Your queries regarding CT1 has been answered in another thread; Actuarial Professional papers.
However I will answer further from here, explaining which CT you might want to take to have a taste of the Actuarial Field.

CT2 will be quite easy for you, because the coverage is basically for Actuaries to get a hold of some Corporate Governance issues and Financial reporting, of which an accountant is more than familiar within every details of it. But, do revise the CT2 sylabus for any changes.

CT3 will be the start of an everyday concept that an actuary will have to deal with in his career. probability and Statistics, again learning things from
mathematical concepts up to solving complicated problems, all advancement of Stochastics, Contingency studies, Survival models and Credibility calculations starts from the concepts you learn in CT3. Hence, this is a very good paper to start with.

CT4- After CT3, expansion of studies in Samples Space, Stochastic approach, and introducing you to calculations related to pricing based on mortality rates.

CT5 - Advanced, best do it after majority paper is completed. the emphasis of Actuarial techniques in CFs and projections.

CT6 - Advanced, The component with the most Eff-ed up theories, and hard to understand theories. covering sufficiently on Credibility of data and various approaches in Risk. and their calculations.

CT7 - basically for the aim of giving Actuaries the required knowledge in intermediate economics, which might fall into the equation on decisions or pricing decisions which is Supply and Demand driven, or have other MAcro factors involved in it. Can be taken at a preliminary level.

CT8 - No joke, do it last.

CT9 - Business and Ethic module, nothing much surprising, just do tonnes of reading on Professional ethics, code of conduct blabla ( in IAAus, this is done under a Bridging course after Part II papers)

The UK sylabus and Aus sylabus fall within similar coverage on part I. Further on, its still similar just that IAA might cover certain things earlier while IoA UK prefer to put certain papers first before the other and vice versa.

We use to have inner jokes when classmates failed units, then we annoy them to take CFA instead! hahaha, and the ridiculous acronym
CFA = Council of Failed Actuaries haha. but how hard it is, I have no experience to judge. Since Part I and II of CFA is purely MCQ.
10000% lot more easier than clearing Actuarial CTs. The coverage of CFA sylabus put an emphasis on basic Finance ( if you do CT1, this is nothing),
portfolio valuation and construction, Investment studies, and some theoretical Corporate FInance issues.

Questions in the exam will be more direct as told by one of my friend, alot of Plug and Play questions.
but it is understandable for CFA to be more "exam-friendly" as the CFA body is not concentrated to the development of one career (no requirement for financial analyst to be a fellow of CFA) , unlike IAA, IAA will oversee and reflect the standard of qualified Actuaries practising worldwide, which perhaps explain the difficulty and complication of its admission processes.


Ask if in doubt. Thanks
hjaxuan
post Mar 21 2011, 12:02 AM

New Member
*
Newbie
2 posts

Joined: Mar 2011
I am nw currently waiting SPM result,

And I have a few questions, hope u all can answer it.

1) Is there any company that provide AS grad scholarship?

2) What subject should I choose for A-level?
RyukA
post Mar 26 2011, 03:07 PM

On my way
****
Senior Member
612 posts

Joined: Jan 2010


QUOTE(hjaxuan @ Mar 21 2011, 12:02 AM)
I am nw currently waiting SPM result,

And  I have a few questions, hope u all can answer it.

1) Is there any company that provide AS grad scholarship?

2) What subject should I choose for A-level?
*
If you dont mind, go through page 7 to page 10 in this post. the answer u seek is somewhere inside. lol
hjaxuan
post Mar 28 2011, 08:47 PM

New Member
*
Newbie
2 posts

Joined: Mar 2011
I have go throught all of the pages but still nt yet get the answer I want.

Can someone help me?? T.T
LightningFist
post Mar 28 2011, 10:43 PM

Minion of the Damned
Group Icon
VIP
3,965 posts

Joined: Apr 2009
Quite obvious, isn't it? No offence, but at A Level there are hardly enough subjects pertinent to Actuarial Science for you to be at odds when trying to choose 3/4 appropriate subjects.
RyukA
post Mar 29 2011, 08:21 PM

On my way
****
Senior Member
612 posts

Joined: Jan 2010


QUOTE(hjaxuan @ Mar 28 2011, 08:47 PM)
I have go throught all of the pages but still nt yet get the answer I want.

Can someone help me?? T.T
*
the Scholarship enquiry perhaps those JPA threads can give u the answer, or easier "ask there" lol

A little add-on, mostly companies wont fund ur Actuarial degree, but there will be more companies that fund you
study fees and costs for your professional examinations once you complete ur degree and start a career in a insurance/actuarial firm.


Regarding suitable subject for a-level. I am not quite sure what u want.
Lightningfist can probably give u insight bout the difficulty of these a-level subjects accordingly.

But if you would want better answers, ask better questions.
e.g. tell us what subject u decided/want to take in A-levels

then we may advise you whether its appropriate for ur pursue in Actuarial Science.

Cheers.

This post has been edited by RyukA: Mar 29 2011, 08:24 PM
macamtakada
post Apr 2 2011, 01:57 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,360 posts

Joined: Aug 2008
Pass SOA exam P with grade 8 enter uni can be exempted from Probability and Statistics I and II or not?

This post has been edited by macamtakada: Apr 2 2011, 01:58 PM
mumeichan
post Apr 4 2011, 11:32 AM

Member
*******
Senior Member
4,152 posts

Joined: May 2005
QUOTE(hjaxuan @ Mar 21 2011, 12:02 AM)
I am nw currently waiting SPM result,

And  I have a few questions, hope u all can answer it.

1) Is there any company that provide AS grad scholarship?

2) What subject should I choose for A-level?
*
QUOTE(hjaxuan @ Mar 28 2011, 08:47 PM)
I have go throught all of the pages but still nt yet get the answer I want.

Can someone help me?? T.T
*
I can help you.

For no.1, do more research yourself. Some kind Malaysians have already prepared alot and I mean ALOT of easy to find summarized resources about scholarships for all levels of education. It's out there, somewhere, I found it myself easily with no one to guide me back then and I think it's 10 time easier now.

No 2. Math Further Math and Economics.
pizzzaboy
post Apr 4 2011, 02:43 PM

New Member
*
Newbie
4 posts

Joined: Apr 2011


I just graduated SPM examination and am an ART student (only taken general mathematic, Perdagangan, economy but not Add Math) well, as a student not being exposed to add math. Does it affect the ability learning to become an actuary? unsure.gif

My friend wanted to study locally for actuarial science in UTAR; I was wondering would it affect his chance of working oversea since his study a local U?

I just found out about courses looks similar to actuary. Like Financial engineering and mathematical financial. Are these courses similar to actuary?

Btw, good post and thank you. ^^

RyukA
post Apr 4 2011, 03:03 PM

On my way
****
Senior Member
612 posts

Joined: Jan 2010


QUOTE(pizzzaboy @ Apr 4 2011, 02:43 PM)
I just graduated SPM examination and am an ART student (only taken general mathematic, Perdagangan, economy but not Add Math) well, as a student not being exposed to add math.  Does it affect the ability learning to become an actuary?  unsure.gif

My friend wanted to study locally for actuarial science in UTAR; I was wondering would it affect his chance of working oversea since his study a local U?

I just found out about courses looks similar to actuary.  Like Financial engineering and mathematical financial.  Are these courses similar to actuary?

Btw, good post and thank you. ^^
*
Again, I want to ask the same question.
Do you know what an actuary does? Why would you want to become an actuary?
*this is to check whether you know what to do next*

Admath f5 is hardly anywhere close to the real concept of Mathematics, except exposing a person to some mathematic formula and learning how to apply.
I would suggest you try to take Math in any Pre-U that involve Calculus( differentiation, Integration, Rates) and Linear Algebra (which is a further study in the Matrix topic that u learn in f5). if you like it, and do well, then Actuarial Science may be still manageable for you.
To answer your question, unless you are a genius in Mathematics even without f5 addmath,
it is nearly impossible for you to understand any math concept (to catch up) that you will be learning in an actuarial degree.

If you havn't go through few pages back from this post, I reckon' you do that.
then you will understand that to fully qualify as an actuary, one have to further take a number of professional papers to pass these exams to obtain fellowship, which by then one can call him/herself a qualified actuary.
There are actuarial institutes around the world, few famous ones namely SoA, IAA, CSA,HKIA.
Try to read previous posts, I am sure we have written the same thing over and over again.

A part of an actuarial degree involves studies in Continuous time finance and stochastic processes, these are common topics of Actuarial science and Financial engineering.
Actuary does work in finance sectors although the traditional approach is on insurance and pension funds. this explains why both of these field look so much alike in the finance sector,
but what you learn in a Actuarial degree will be highly different from mathematical finance (which they go deeper into derivative pricing and stochastic model stock pricing) or financial engineering.

Do spend some time reading up previous posts, you may find them helpful.

katana18
post Apr 7 2011, 09:18 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
161 posts

Joined: Mar 2007
From: Subang Jaya


I just read through all 12 pages in the hope of finding a rough figure for the starting salary of Actuarial Associates. No luck.

I'm an actuarial student at Drake University, Iowa. Don't listen to people who tell you that Drake is one of the lesser schools. Those are the people who go to places like Wisconsin-Madison & UPenn mostly because they are highly ranked. If what you really want to do is Act Sci, then you'd be hard pressed to do any better than Drake (except Waterloo, which I turned down). I've passed the first two papers of the SOA (P & FM), and I will be starting my summer internship with Maybank Etiqa in May. I'd like to share my experience with anyone who might be interested, and I hope that you benefit from it.

First off, if you can't speak perfect English, do yourself a favor and learn how to now. In the wonderful world of actuaries, we learn how to apply concepts that most people will never hear of in their lifetimes. However, you need to communicate these concepts to your manager, regulators, assistants, etc. That, and you will never be employed by an American company if people have problems with your grammar/accent. I missed the window to secure an internship in the US because of bad timing. But if I fail to secure one next summer, then I really need to reexamine my priorities.

Secondly, the coursework is rigorous. I got a headache reading through the Accounting vs. Actuary part of this thread, because it was an absolute waste of time. I'll clarify this now: Under the US system, actuaries learn basic accounting practices similar to the stuff you took for SPM. The reason we learn this is to be familiar with that aspect of the business, which every business graduate should be required to know. At Drake, the courses you take are designed to prepare you for the first 5 papers required to obtain your Associate in the Society of Actuaries (ASA). That means 5-6 advanced statistics courses, 4-5 advanced finance courses, and 1-2 advanced economics classes (think regression analysis). It also goes without saying that you will complete your VEE, unless you score lower than a B. Almost every serious actuarial science student I know has never scored lower than a B.

Thirdly, the emphasis on programming is there for a reason. Actuaries in traditional roles (life, health, pension, etc) will work extensively with Excel and other actuarial software. You may have heard that act sci graduates go to the office, punch a few buttons, let the software do all the work, and then call it a day. Sounds simple, but this is only possible because the actuary knows exactly what's going on, and has excellent programming skills (VBA recommended!). It's probably more complicated than that, but that's why I'm doing an internship this summer.

Finally, a word on supply & demand. There are almost 200 Malaysian students at Drake, the majority of which are actuarial science students. The average IQ is probably north of 120, with a few exceptions. Last year, there were about 50-60 act sci graduates. 5 got full-time offers. Multiply the number of students returning to Malaysia by the number of universities, and you're looking at a thousand smart kids fighting for several dozen positions. I'm not trying to scare anyone out of their ambition, but you should be aware of this.

I am not your typical Malaysian studying abroad. I am more white than I care to explain. I am an active member of a social fraternity, Sigma Chi, which to my knowledge is something that has never been done before at Drake by any Malaysian. I fully intend to secure a position here after I graduate with 4-5 papers. And it is my sincere hope that you think long and hard about studying Actuarial Science before you make the commitment I have.

This post has been edited by katana18: Apr 7 2011, 09:20 PM
veger_leong
post Apr 19 2011, 10:52 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
86 posts

Joined: Dec 2008


Anyone know where can we learn about the prophet modelling ? or can we download the programme ?
Amit Srivastava
post May 14 2011, 03:44 AM

New Member
*
Newbie
3 posts

Joined: May 2011


Hello all
I am an IT associate in National stock exchange india. My work is to give technical support to clearing and settlement process.
I am confused whether i should go for actuaries or not as i have two years of work experience and i am not satisfied with the job.
I am good in maths and also in coding but my job is now almost non technical(coding) as it involves business analysis. What are the options available for me.If anyone can suggest i will be highly appreciate.

Thank you
N900user
post May 19 2011, 08:26 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
54 posts

Joined: Sep 2010


QUOTE(macamtakada @ Apr 2 2011, 01:57 PM)
Pass SOA exam P with grade 8 enter uni can be exempted from Probability and Statistics I and II or not?
*
wow.. you shud be great since you can pass your P before entering university..
we welcome u to the actuaries, make sure you pass all the preliminary exams; P, FM, MLC, MFE and C before graduate.
Does it sound hard? A lot of my coursemates passed all before graduate.
If you can, get an ASA title or pass two (or three due to the recently changes of requirement from SOA) advanced paper.
I think the job will come to you rather you look for a job.

Good luck dude
N900user
post May 19 2011, 08:33 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
54 posts

Joined: Sep 2010


QUOTE(katana18 @ Apr 7 2011, 09:18 PM)
I just read through all 12 pages in the hope of finding a rough figure for the starting salary of Actuarial Associates. No luck.

I'm an actuarial student at Drake University, Iowa. Don't listen to people who tell you that Drake is one of the lesser schools. Those are the people who go to places like Wisconsin-Madison & UPenn mostly because they are highly ranked. If what you really want to do is Act Sci, then you'd be hard pressed to do any better than Drake (except Waterloo, which I turned down). I've passed the first two papers of the SOA (P & FM), and I will be starting my summer internship with Maybank Etiqa in May. I'd like to share my experience with anyone who might be interested, and I hope that you benefit from it.

...........................

I am not your typical Malaysian studying abroad. I am more white than I care to explain. I am an active member of a social fraternity, Sigma Chi, which to my knowledge is something that has never been done before at Drake by any Malaysian. I fully intend to secure a position here after I graduate with 4-5 papers. And it is my sincere hope that you think long and hard about studying Actuarial Science before you make the commitment I have.
*
.

I always find that one who study oversea is clever and smart. You still need to put a lot of effort to gain your Associate and Fellow before graduate. Because when you work, you have no time to study or difficult to concentrate. Studying exams for SOA is never easy. Personally, I failed the first two papers in the first attempt because I did not study enough and I did not underestimate it. To be qualified, we still have a long way to go. Lets work hard together.
Gissle
post Jun 29 2011, 02:12 PM

New Member
*
Newbie
1 posts

Joined: Jun 2011
Thanks for sharing some info ealier.
Anyway , here is my question that boders me for months.
I got offers from Uni of Melbourne, Macquerie, Southampton, Manchester and City Uni ( Cass ) for actuarial science. So I was confused for some reasons because
City offers good exemption condition ( 9 papers according to my friend), business school ranking was quiet high , and there is placement or interns , plus I can see Singapore Actuary Organization state the name City .( planning to work in Singapore).
However the overall ranking of the Uni was not impressive.

Then I have Southampton, they have good reputation and good ranking, but ranking for business school I do not know. Exemption papers 8 only. No placement

Then, Manchester, according to another friend, this is a good business school , reputation good, but the actuarial science was very new ,it is establish at 2008. ranking superb, but I cant see its name in SAO or Malaysia Actuary Board.

So, I would like to ask. Is the exemption and placement more important, or the ranking and education quality is more important for the industry in future? So what do you think ?
Searingmage
post Jul 2 2011, 09:32 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,809 posts

Joined: Feb 2010


QUOTE(Gissle @ Jun 29 2011, 02:12 PM)
Thanks for sharing some info ealier.
Anyway , here is my question that boders me for months.
I got offers from Uni of Melbourne, Macquerie, Southampton, Manchester and City Uni ( Cass ) for actuarial science. So I was confused for some reasons because
City offers good exemption condition ( 9 papers according to my friend), business school ranking was quiet high , and there is placement or interns , plus I can see Singapore Actuary Organization state the name City .( planning to work in Singapore).
However the overall ranking of the Uni was not impressive.

Then I have Southampton, they have good reputation and good ranking, but ranking for business school I do not know. Exemption papers 8 only. No placement

Then, Manchester, according to another friend, this is a good business school , reputation good, but the actuarial science was very new ,it is establish at 2008. ranking superb, but I cant see its name in SAO or Malaysia Actuary Board.

So, I would like to ask. Is the exemption and placement more important, or the ranking and education quality is more important for the industry in future?  So what do you think ?
*
My personal opinion is, exemption is more important than the ranking of your university..
You can graduate from the best university in the world from degree in actuarial science, but if you don't have professional paper, you will be treated just like any random people.. Of course, quality of education is also important to help you in your further papers..
SoA(I assume SAO is a typo) is a us actuarial society, so naturally there isn't any uni in UK that offer SoA since they have their own body..
mumeichan
post Jul 2 2011, 10:11 PM

Member
*******
Senior Member
4,152 posts

Joined: May 2005
QUOTE(Searingmage @ Jul 2 2011, 09:32 PM)
You can graduate from the best university in the world from degree in actuarial science, but if you don't have professional paper, you will be treated just like any random people..
*
Um no, you'll be treated like a graduated from the best uni unless you want to work in the actuarial field.

LightningFist
post Jul 2 2011, 10:15 PM

Minion of the Damned
Group Icon
VIP
3,965 posts

Joined: Apr 2009
Who knows what the best university for actuarial science is anyway? There isn't a ranking for that, if rankings are what you go by.
mumeichan
post Jul 2 2011, 10:31 PM

Member
*******
Senior Member
4,152 posts

Joined: May 2005
QUOTE(LightningFist @ Jul 2 2011, 10:15 PM)
Who knows what the best university for actuarial science is anyway? There isn't a ranking for that, if rankings are what you go by.
*
Haha. But I suppose since ranking is helpful to get a quick general idea of the school's standing, one could leech off employer's ranking for the school's math and business departments. General ranking are not so good because they focus alot of research, publication and infrastructure which aren't as important for professional courses. Again, quick general idea, a simple heuristic to go by, that's not to say deeper research into how you wanna make your education investment worthwhile doesn't count.
LightningFist
post Jul 2 2011, 10:59 PM

Minion of the Damned
Group Icon
VIP
3,965 posts

Joined: Apr 2009
Yeah, ranking only reflects so much. Only those at the top 3 spots are consistent in nearly all the rankings, every year. Plus they have huge leads over everything below them. One caveat, they don't teach Actuarial Science!


Searingmage
post Jul 3 2011, 01:02 AM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,809 posts

Joined: Feb 2010


QUOTE(mumeichan @ Jul 2 2011, 10:11 PM)
Um no, you'll be treated like a graduated from the best uni unless you want to work in the actuarial field.
*
Fine.. I phrase my wording wrongly.. laugh.gif
I always assume those who enter actuarial science course = want to work in actuarial field.
mumeichan
post Jul 3 2011, 06:05 AM

Member
*******
Senior Member
4,152 posts

Joined: May 2005
QUOTE(Searingmage @ Jul 3 2011, 01:02 AM)
Fine.. I phrase my wording wrongly.. laugh.gif
I always assume those who enter actuarial science course = want to work in actuarial field.
*
Lol, you left out the "hmph!" biggrin.gif. Btw, even if working in actuarial field like insurance, investment and real estate, you won't get to do anything much when you're first employed anyway. Of course, when interview that time they will ask the person lor why he didn't take the paper. And they're not short of people from good universities with papers too. But if someone perform well during the interview together with a good university background, nothing's stopping him from landing the job. Paper can come later.

This post has been edited by mumeichan: Jul 3 2011, 06:09 AM
samanthalia
post Jul 16 2011, 12:44 AM

New Member
*
Newbie
1 posts

Joined: Jul 2011
I was offered a degree in financial mathematics? should i change my course to actuarial science?
should i just pursue financial mathematics??
AceSaboLuffy
post Jul 23 2011, 07:04 PM

New Member
*
Newbie
3 posts

Joined: Jul 2011
QUOTE(monkeyseemonkeydo @ May 23 2009, 05:13 PM)
Good point, communication skills is one of the most valued commodity in the actuarial world. This is because what we do in the field is so technical, that normal people will never be able to understand it. Thats is why, we need good communication to be able to present our work in laymen form to higher management. In fact, two of the UK institute papers are based around communication as the Institute has realised how important this skill is to the field. And that is why, I do stress that having a good command of English is necessary to succeed in the actuarial world.

In my opinion, the reason why more and more people with AS degree are venturing into other fields is because they cannot cope with the exams pressure and have decided that they do not want to be an actuary. However, with a degree, we do know how to manage any financial risk, and that is probably why people venture into risk management, which is extremely big now, due to the credit crisis. But bear in mind, that not all companies provide study support to these graduates, and they will most likely end up as risk managers, not actuaries.


Added on May 23, 2009, 5:23 pm

I believe that if someone is not too sure whether they like this profession, they should do more research, talk to some actuaries and go do an internship. The work of an actuary and an accountant is so different that it is hard to compare them both on an equal footing. It all boils down to the individual, I guess. I personally never saw myself as an accountant, hence the choice was easy. I do agree though that when an accountant moves to management, he would need the same qualities, however, the question is, would you like the work thrown at you before you become senior management?

I'm going to be very biased now, and say that it is true that accountants do have more flexibility, but so do actuaries. The fact that qualified accountants are a dime a dozen, is probably gonna make competition tough. Actuaries are elite. smile.gif
*

Added on July 23, 2011, 7:08 pm
QUOTE(monkeyseemonkeydo @ May 23 2009, 05:13 PM)
Good point, communication skills is one of the most valued commodity in the actuarial world. This is because what we do in the field is so technical, that normal people will never be able to understand it. Thats is why, we need good communication to be able to present our work in laymen form to higher management. In fact, two of the UK institute papers are based around communication as the Institute has realised how important this skill is to the field. And that is why, I do stress that having a good command of English is necessary to succeed in the actuarial world.

In my opinion, the reason why more and more people with AS degree are venturing into other fields is because they cannot cope with the exams pressure and have decided that they do not want to be an actuary. However, with a degree, we do know how to manage any financial risk, and that is probably why people venture into risk management, which is extremely big now, due to the credit crisis. But bear in mind, that not all companies provide study support to these graduates, and they will most likely end up as risk managers, not actuaries.


Added on May 23, 2009, 5:23 pm

I believe that if someone is not too sure whether they like this profession, they should do more research, talk to some actuaries and go do an internship. The work of an actuary and an accountant is so different that it is hard to compare them both on an equal footing. It all boils down to the individual, I guess. I personally never saw myself as an accountant, hence the choice was easy. I do agree though that when an accountant moves to management, he would need the same qualities, however, the question is, would you like the work thrown at you before you become senior management?

I'm going to be very biased now, and say that it is true that accountants do have more flexibility, but so do actuaries. The fact that qualified accountants are a dime a dozen, is probably gonna make competition tough. Actuaries are elite. smile.gif
*
Hey, I do have interest in the Actuarial Profession. But I want do some research before I make a decision. Do you know that where can I find a qualified actuary in Malaysia? or in Sabah? I'm from Sabah. I would like to talk with them to gain more informations about this career. Thank you and please asap.


Added on July 23, 2011, 7:12 pm
QUOTE(Searingmage @ Jul 2 2011, 09:32 PM)
My personal opinion is, exemption is more important than the ranking of your university..
You can graduate from the best university in the world from degree in actuarial science, but if you don't have professional paper, you will be treated just like any random people.. Of course, quality of education is also important to help you in your further papers..
SoA(I assume SAO is a typo) is a us actuarial society, so naturally there isn't any uni in UK that offer SoA since they have their own body..
*
Hey, I do have interest in the Actuarial Profession. But I want do some research before I make a decision. Do you know that where can I find a qualified actuary in Malaysia? or in Sabah? I'm from Sabah. I would like to talk with them to gain more informations about this career. Thank you and please asap.

This post has been edited by AceSaboLuffy: Jul 23 2011, 07:12 PM
LightningFist
post Jul 23 2011, 08:56 PM

Minion of the Damned
Group Icon
VIP
3,965 posts

Joined: Apr 2009
An actuary in Malaysia? That'll be the day... I think there are too few. Not even sure if the name of one has been mentioned in the news. Maybe try the website, but you may struggle to find the contact details of an actual actuary.
AceSaboLuffy
post Jul 24 2011, 09:44 AM

New Member
*
Newbie
3 posts

Joined: Jul 2011
QUOTE(LightningFist @ Jul 23 2011, 08:56 PM)
An actuary in Malaysia? That'll be the day... I think there are too few. Not even sure if the name of one has been mentioned in the news. Maybe try the website, but you may struggle to find the contact details of an actual actuary.
*
Thanks for replying. Yeah. I've checked the website of Actuarial Society of Malaysia to find their contacts. But there is just a list of their committee members but no attached with their contact details. Is it really hard to find an actuary in Malaysia? Those posts above said that got around 50+ actuaries in Malaysia,so, I think at least can find one! Between, where do you come from ? Outside Malaysia?

Anyway, please update me if you have the latest information about the actuary or about this career !! Thanks.

This post has been edited by AceSaboLuffy: Jul 24 2011, 10:26 AM
Searingmage
post Jul 30 2011, 12:58 AM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,809 posts

Joined: Feb 2010


QUOTE(mumeichan @ Jul 3 2011, 06:05 AM)
Lol, you left out the "hmph!" biggrin.gif. Btw, even if working in actuarial field like insurance, investment and real estate, you won't get to do anything much when you're first employed anyway. Of course, when interview that time they will ask the person lor why he didn't take the paper. And they're not short of people from good universities with papers too. But if someone perform well during the interview together with a good university background, nothing's stopping him from landing the job. Paper can come later.
*
Problem comes when two equal people goes for the same job interview, with one having an extra paper than the other..
But I do agree interview performance is EXTREMELY important, more important..
Also, in Malaysia, paper is important to get a job, BUT too many paper have negative effect instead.. laugh.gif
Ideally, in Malaysia (for SoA), 3-5 papers is good.
AceSaboLuffy
post Aug 2 2011, 06:20 PM

New Member
*
Newbie
3 posts

Joined: Jul 2011
QUOTE(LightningFist @ Jul 23 2011, 08:56 PM)
An actuary in Malaysia? That'll be the day... I think there are too few. Not even sure if the name of one has been mentioned in the news. Maybe try the website, but you may struggle to find the contact details of an actual actuary.
*
Hey. I found that you're one of the guys who keep replying our comments, you're kinda a good guy.Hahaha rclxms.gif

And, I've read some of your posts and comments before, not all, alot of time will be vanished if I do so. LOL. So, are you really take an actuarial science degree? Which uni are you in now? What stuffs had you done in your 9 months free time?( if you still remember your comments). Just tell me what you had done. Working? Reading books related to this career?


LightningFist
post Aug 3 2011, 05:55 PM

Minion of the Damned
Group Icon
VIP
3,965 posts

Joined: Apr 2009
I worked, and yes, I'm studying Actuarial Science right now.
ryanshee8989
post Aug 3 2011, 09:42 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
146 posts

Joined: Apr 2011
QUOTE(LightningFist @ Aug 3 2011, 05:55 PM)
I worked, and yes, I'm studying Actuarial Science right now.
*
which uni r u from?
RyukA
post Aug 4 2011, 02:58 PM

On my way
****
Senior Member
612 posts

Joined: Jan 2010


QUOTE(AceSaboLuffy @ Jul 23 2011, 07:04 PM)

Added on July 23, 2011, 7:08 pm
Hey, I do have interest in the Actuarial Profession. But I want do some research before I make a decision. Do you know that where can I find a qualified actuary in Malaysia? or in Sabah? I'm from Sabah. I would like to talk with them to gain more informations about this career. Thank you and please asap.


Added on July 23, 2011, 7:12 pm
Hey, I do have interest in the Actuarial Profession. But I want do some research before I make a decision. Do you know that where can I find a qualified actuary in Malaysia? or in Sabah? I'm from Sabah. I would like to talk with them to gain more informations about this career. Thank you and please asap.
*
Firstly. Actuarial profession is a term itself, that can have broad interpretations.
To your preference, do you in particular mean traditional roles : like pension funds, life insurance, and policy pricing,
or does it include modern roles like Risk analysis, provisions & forecasting, financial liability management, superannuation, and
reinsurance?

Until you can identify your specific interest within the actuarial scope, the range from financials to risk-evaluation, are inclined to different field of study. Perhaps by suggesting your career preference (if it applies) within the actuarial context, might help you find the transition between your past career to your goals, less complicated. (e.g. You wont want to find a life actuary to talk about transitions from accounting career to a financial risk analyst position).


Just to make sure, you get the advise you need.
Cheers.


Added on August 4, 2011, 3:05 pm
QUOTE(AceSaboLuffy @ Jul 24 2011, 09:44 AM)
Thanks for replying. Yeah. I've checked the website of Actuarial Society of Malaysia to find their contacts. But there is just a list of their committee members but no attached with their contact details. Is it really hard to find an actuary in Malaysia? Those posts above said that got around 50+ actuaries in Malaysia,so, I think at least can find one! Between, where do you come from ? Outside Malaysia?

Anyway, please update me if you have the latest information about the actuary or about this career !! Thanks.
*
I do have a few actuarial contacts on a formal basis. But it will be best to enquire on employment-related queries, as you know,
qualified actuaries in malaysia are usually very busy (considering most of them work for few firms, or lead the team). hwoever, you can always address more casual questions to actuarial institutes, or organisations, which you might get a more "dedicated and accurate" answer.
If its generally on "studies", general career prospects and suggestions, then this forum shall be deemed sufficient to get an overview of how things work.

Dont hesitate to ask.

This post has been edited by RyukA: Aug 4 2011, 03:06 PM
Angel01
post Aug 4 2011, 04:07 PM

Stars @_@
******
Senior Member
1,487 posts

Joined: Jan 2008
From: Penang


I got a scholarship to study Actuarial Science in University of Southampton, is that a good university for as?
joonwei23
post Aug 4 2011, 07:59 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,019 posts

Joined: Sep 2009
QUOTE(Angel01 @ Aug 4 2011, 04:07 PM)
I got a scholarship to study Actuarial Science in University of Southampton, is that a good university for as?
*
I'm pursuing my degree in Actuarial Science this year at Southampton.
Well, hoping for the best as always. smile.gif
Angel01
post Aug 5 2011, 12:34 PM

Stars @_@
******
Senior Member
1,487 posts

Joined: Jan 2008
From: Penang


Hey, want find accomodation together?

I missed the 1st August deadline...
By the way where are you from?
lets get to know each other smile.gif

Searingmage
post Aug 6 2011, 03:49 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,809 posts

Joined: Feb 2010


@ Angel01, Southampton university should be a good university for actuarial science.
Angel01
post Aug 6 2011, 07:33 PM

Stars @_@
******
Senior Member
1,487 posts

Joined: Jan 2008
From: Penang


QUOTE(Searingmage @ Aug 6 2011, 03:49 PM)
@ Angel01, Southampton university should be a good university for actuarial science.
*
Dear Searingmage, on what basis would you say that?

I notice you use * should *...
Any heads up for me?

Thanks!


Added on August 6, 2011, 9:31 pmHey, i got a question..
Can someone describe to me the path of an actuary, i dun mean the general path, i mean for the exams.. like which year and what requirement for each exam...

Like 2nd year in your actuary degree only can take what paper, or maybe you need working experience to take which paper...

Would appreciate the info..
Assuming you are in UK Btw.

This post has been edited by Angel01: Aug 6 2011, 09:31 PM
RyukA
post Aug 7 2011, 01:13 AM

On my way
****
Senior Member
612 posts

Joined: Jan 2010


QUOTE(Angel01 @ Aug 6 2011, 07:33 PM)



Added on August 6, 2011, 9:31 pmHey, i got a question..
Can someone describe to me the path of an actuary, i dun mean the general path, i mean for the exams.. like which year and what requirement for each exam...

Like 2nd year in your actuary degree only can take what paper, or maybe you need working experience to take which paper...

Would appreciate the info..
Assuming you are in UK Btw.
*
I believe when you start attending classes there (in Southampton), ur lecturer and seniors will brief you through which paper is recommended to be cleared first etc. Even though similarly all actuarial schools in the UK are tied to the institute. The sylabus are highly identical, but the order may be quite different.
Some school, teaches probability first, some school starts with financial math, some begins with programming skills.
hence, saying what paper to "clear first" is quite a "it depends" scenario. And would need someone in the same school to tell you whats the best order to tackle the papers.
For general informations regarding actuarial examinations (for any board), just go on to www.actuaries.org.uk Everything is basically up there. Check under "be an actuary" and "student". You will get a better view of whats expected of you, hopefully.

if you have any questions regarding these issues and cannot find an answer from the website, just ask it here (be more specific, of course)

Cheers

This post has been edited by RyukA: Aug 7 2011, 01:14 AM
o.P ace
post Aug 7 2011, 08:35 AM

New Member
*
Junior Member
31 posts

Joined: Jul 2011
thanx for sharing. smile.gif
LightningFist
post Aug 7 2011, 02:47 PM

Minion of the Damned
Group Icon
VIP
3,965 posts

Joined: Apr 2009
QUOTE(Angel01 @ Aug 4 2011, 04:07 PM)
I got a scholarship to study Actuarial Science in University of Southampton, is that a good university for as?
*
Did you get a full scholarship with 3 years tuition + accommodation?

Southampton is good and reputable enough, I suppose. My teacher went to Southampton (grad school) before getting a PhD from UPenn. Competition in the UK would be LSE and Warwick.
joonwei23
post Aug 7 2011, 03:02 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,019 posts

Joined: Sep 2009
QUOTE(LightningFist @ Aug 7 2011, 02:47 PM)
Did you get a full scholarship with 3 years tuition + accommodation?

Southampton is good and reputable enough, I suppose. My teacher went to Southampton (grad school) before getting a PhD from UPenn. Competition in the UK would be LSE and Warwick.
*
from what I heard H.W in Scotland is quite good actually.
Where are you pursuing your degree at ? smile.gif
LightningFist
post Aug 7 2011, 03:43 PM

Minion of the Damned
Group Icon
VIP
3,965 posts

Joined: Apr 2009
Yeah, there have been nice things said about HW. However, as is the norm with Scottish schools, a BSc takes 4 years to complete - though you can easily skip to the second year with good pre-u results, you're basically missing the first year's courses. I'm not sure how that works out in terms of exemptions, but that aside it might even appeal to some - that you can do a 4 year degree in 3 years and it'd still be equivalent to those 3 year degrees offered by the likes of Soton. On the other hand, 4 years could get you an Master's degree in the UK or an Honours degree in Australia (which is almost like an alternative version of a Master's degree).
Searingmage
post Aug 7 2011, 11:21 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,809 posts

Joined: Feb 2010


QUOTE(Angel01 @ Aug 6 2011, 07:33 PM)
Dear Searingmage, on what basis would you say that?

I notice you use * should *...
Any heads up for me?

Thanks!


Added on August 6, 2011, 9:31 pmHey, i got a question..
Can someone describe to me the path of an actuary, i dun mean the general path, i mean for the exams.. like which year and what requirement for each exam...

Like 2nd year in your actuary degree only can take what paper, or maybe you need working experience to take which paper...

Would appreciate the info..
Assuming you are in UK Btw.
*
I have a friend studying there, and I'm informed that it's quite good. Should because I heard it from a third party source, not personal experience.
As for exam, unfortunately I am unable to help as I'm studying SoA, not UK's IOA
Angel01
post Aug 8 2011, 10:41 AM

Stars @_@
******
Senior Member
1,487 posts

Joined: Jan 2008
From: Penang


QUOTE(LightningFist @ Aug 7 2011, 02:47 PM)
Did you get a full scholarship with 3 years tuition + accommodation?

Southampton is good and reputable enough, I suppose. My teacher went to Southampton (grad school) before getting a PhD from UPenn. Competition in the UK would be LSE and Warwick.
*
Hmm as i saw southampton got 8 exemptions while lse and warwick has 7 only...
LightningFist
post Aug 8 2011, 02:44 PM

Minion of the Damned
Group Icon
VIP
3,965 posts

Joined: Apr 2009
A number of people in the Actuarial profession also come from Oxbridge. As it stands Oxbridge offers a total of 0 exemptions from Actuarial CT or CA exams by undergraduate study. Despite this nearly everyone would be in agreement as to Oxbridge's status as being amongst the top in most areas of study (including Mathematics).
Angel01
post Aug 8 2011, 03:08 PM

Stars @_@
******
Senior Member
1,487 posts

Joined: Jan 2008
From: Penang


really?

hmm rarely heard of oxford for actuarial science, ever since small was like heriot watt heriot watt and lse lse...
Searingmage
post Aug 8 2011, 10:34 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,809 posts

Joined: Feb 2010


QUOTE(Angel01 @ Aug 8 2011, 10:41 AM)
Hmm as i saw southampton got 8 exemptions while lse and warwick has 7 only...
*
Personal opinion, which has been stated on the previous page in this thread..
More exemption = better..
Even if the university name is not as nice as another, but offer more exemption, you should prioritize that university..
UNLESS, you think you might choose other fields beside actuarial. If you are dead determined that you want to be an actuary, then go for exemptions..
Angel01
post Aug 9 2011, 11:30 AM

Stars @_@
******
Senior Member
1,487 posts

Joined: Jan 2008
From: Penang


Yup thats exactly what i thought..
More exemption for me better smile.gif

By the way you can only apply for exemption after you complete the degree?
Searingmage
post Aug 10 2011, 11:42 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,809 posts

Joined: Feb 2010


QUOTE(Angel01 @ Aug 9 2011, 11:30 AM)
Yup thats exactly what i thought..
More exemption for me better smile.gif

By the way you can only apply for exemption after you complete the degree?
*
IINM, the exemption is given after you complete the specific courses required for the exemption..
But bear in mind usually exemption is given to those who can achieve relatively good result, not just everyone who can pass the paper, hence, even if your university have exemption, you may not be exempted if your result isn't good enough.. However, the minimum requirement should be not difficult to achieve.

This post has been edited by Searingmage: Aug 10 2011, 11:44 PM
veger_leong
post Aug 13 2011, 12:54 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
86 posts

Joined: Dec 2008


QUOTE(Searingmage @ Aug 7 2011, 11:21 PM)
I have a friend studying there, and I'm informed that it's quite good. Should because I heard it from a third party source, not personal experience.
As for exam, unfortunately I am unable to help as I'm studying SoA, not UK's IOA
*
hey you are studing soa as well? I just passed my second paper Exam FM so now i completed my first two paper will be doing exam c and fap for next. What exam are you taking now ya? I have no idea how is FAP working hope you can give me some advice and do you have any study guide/books for exam c? I mean soft copy : )

Crazy.SoT.Gila
post Aug 18 2011, 02:56 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,704 posts

Joined: Sep 2005
From: Oil Town


Is anyone here pursuing (or already have) the CERA credential? Any insights?
Angel01
post Aug 18 2011, 03:20 PM

Stars @_@
******
Senior Member
1,487 posts

Joined: Jan 2008
From: Penang


by the way, does anyone know the grading system in uk?

In malaysia we are still having CGPA and stuff...
RyukA
post Aug 22 2011, 06:48 AM

On my way
****
Senior Member
612 posts

Joined: Jan 2010


QUOTE(Angel01 @ Aug 18 2011, 03:20 PM)
by the way, does anyone know the grading system in uk?

In malaysia we are still having CGPA and stuff...
*
your best bet is, check with your Uni.
Should be A,B,C,D......

And annual examinations, unless its semester-ised.


LightningFist
post Aug 22 2011, 02:36 PM

Minion of the Damned
Group Icon
VIP
3,965 posts

Joined: Apr 2009
QUOTE(Angel01 @ Aug 18 2011, 03:20 PM)
by the way, does anyone know the grading system in uk?

In malaysia we are still having CGPA and stuff...
*
There are the classes, of course (firsts, 2:1s etc).

There is probably also a % score for each "module" or "unit". Of course these vary with subject and school.
BoonieTan
post Aug 23 2011, 04:43 PM

On my way
****
Junior Member
515 posts

Joined: Jul 2011
From: Selangor


I saw a video made about FSA few days ago. Does anyone know anything about this FSA thingy?

Enlighten me please, thank you. =)
Searingmage
post Sep 16 2011, 12:23 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,809 posts

Joined: Feb 2010


QUOTE(BoonieTan @ Aug 23 2011, 04:43 PM)
I saw a video made about FSA few days ago. Does anyone know anything about this FSA thingy?

Enlighten me please, thank you. =)
*
What do you want to know about FSA? While my knowledge may not be complete on FSA aspect, I can try my very best to tell you what I know
KeepLol
post Sep 21 2011, 11:33 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
55 posts

Joined: Mar 2011
From: Penang, Malaysia


May I know the universities that follow SOA are mostly from which countries?

This post has been edited by KeepLol: Sep 21 2011, 11:34 PM
LightningFist
post Sep 21 2011, 11:50 PM

Minion of the Damned
Group Icon
VIP
3,965 posts

Joined: Apr 2009
USA, Canada.
N900user
post Sep 26 2011, 04:33 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
54 posts

Joined: Sep 2010


QUOTE(veger_leong @ Aug 13 2011, 12:54 AM)
hey you are studing soa as well? I just passed my second paper Exam FM so now i completed my first two paper will be doing exam c and fap for next. What exam are you taking now ya? I have no idea how is FAP working hope you can give me some advice and do you have any study guide/books for exam c? I mean soft copy : )
*
wow.. congratulations that u have completed your first two papers. I myself need to pass these two exams on the 2nd attempt.. im doin c now; hopefully can pass..
fap is something more relevant to the business world.. if u r really wan to be associate or fellow..
i suggest u to complete all the prelim papers first instead.. the last one should be fap..
of coz, u can do it concurrently, but personally i don advise one to do so..
as the papers already so difficult.. but everyone got different strengths...
regarding the softcopy of the study manual, strongly advised that u get a copy from the soa... i mean, buy one thru online..
not encourage for the photostating or download the pirated version..
jz curious, are u still studying or already working.. if you are still studying..
it is good for u to complete ur prelim before you leave ur uni..
good luck dude..
hunterxxx
post Oct 28 2011, 09:00 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
15 posts

Joined: May 2010
QUOTE(N900user @ Sep 26 2011, 04:33 PM)
wow.. congratulations that u have completed your first two papers. I myself need  to pass these two exams on the 2nd attempt.. im doin c now; hopefully can pass..
fap is something more relevant to the business world.. if u r really wan to be associate or fellow..
i suggest u to complete all the prelim papers first instead.. the last one should be fap..
of coz, u can do it concurrently, but personally i don advise one to do so..
as the papers already so difficult.. but everyone got different strengths...
regarding the softcopy of the study manual, strongly advised that u get a copy from the soa... i mean, buy one thru online..
not encourage for the photostating or download the pirated version..
jz curious, are u still studying or already working.. if you are still studying..
it is good for u to complete ur prelim before you leave ur uni..
good luck dude..
*
May I know both of you from which university? Because I am deciding to pursue ADP for actuarial science or maybe UCSI which follows SoA.

Struggling in between sad.gif

JoelleC
post Nov 22 2011, 04:56 PM

New Member
*
Newbie
1 posts

Joined: Nov 2011
QUOTE(Searingmage @ Nov 23 2010, 01:14 AM)
You are interested in FIA or SOA?
If SoA, you can send me a pm and I can brief you.. FIA can't help, sry..
*
i am interested in SOA, can u please some info about it with me as well? smile.gif
Searingmage
post Nov 27 2011, 07:44 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,809 posts

Joined: Feb 2010


QUOTE(JoelleC @ Nov 22 2011, 04:56 PM)
i am interested in SOA, can u please some info about it with me as well? smile.gif
*
In the future, do pm me instead of leaving a msg at the forum as I am occasionally inactive.
What info would you like to know about the SoA?
I will do my best to answer your queries..


Added on November 27, 2011, 7:45 pm
QUOTE(hunterxxx @ Oct 28 2011, 09:00 PM)
May I know both of you from which university? Because I am deciding to pursue ADP for actuarial science or maybe UCSI which follows SoA.

Struggling in between sad.gif
*
UTAR > UCSI.. I don't trust UCSI, honestly..
No opinion on ADP.

This post has been edited by Searingmage: Nov 27 2011, 07:45 PM
yernnyrocks
post Jan 23 2012, 11:50 PM

New Member
*
Newbie
2 posts

Joined: Sep 2008



Added on January 23, 2012, 11:59 pm
QUOTE(Angel01 @ Aug 4 2011, 04:07 PM)
I got a scholarship to study Actuarial Science in University of Southampton, is that a good university for as?
*
did you get a full scholarship or is it just a grant?

does anybody know of any scholarships that i can apply for actuary studies in the UK? (A level results: 4A*)
I am interested in City uni and Herriot-Watt

This post has been edited by yernnyrocks: Jan 23 2012, 11:59 PM
ratloverice
post Jan 24 2012, 04:20 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Junior Member
804 posts

Joined: May 2010
QUOTE(yernnyrocks @ Jan 23 2012, 11:50 PM)

Added on January 23, 2012, 11:59 pm

did you get a full scholarship or is it just a grant?

does anybody know of any scholarships that i can apply for actuary studies in the UK? (A level results: 4A*)
I am interested in City uni and Herriot-Watt
*
LSE, City, Heriot Watt, Kent, Swansea, Southampton, Manchester, Warwick.
jinakMERPATI
post Jan 25 2012, 07:44 PM

New Member
*
Validating
27 posts

Joined: Aug 2009


I have a lot of questions I would like to ask here based on my current situation.

I did my degree of Actuarial Science and Risk Management (BScHs) in one of local university. What I regret is that since our uni is new in this course, so they did not emphasize on passing professional papers (SOA). So, I don't have any passing paper at the moment and I thought that with degree's cert, it is easy for me to get a job after grad. Hell yeah~~ Unemployed since May 2011.

So, I plan on further my study (master) and at the same time undergo professional papers. The problems are:

- If further study, I dont know what course benefits me (actuarial profession).

- Which uni better (local or oversea) & How to make an application to those uni.

- How to apply for scholar.

This post has been edited by jinakMERPATI: Jan 25 2012, 07:45 PM
meishien5602
post Feb 3 2012, 06:52 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
62 posts

Joined: Feb 2012


QUOTE(monkeyseemonkeydo @ May 23 2009, 07:04 AM)
I believe that people are doing Actuarial Science for the wrong reasons. I hope that this post will actually shatter the disillusionment that people have. Don’t get me wrong, I am not trying to discourage people to pursue this challenging course, its challenge being its ultimate reward. However, it is disheartening to see so many people get into this course and ending up not being qualified actuaries, because they fail to understand what this course is all about.
First and foremost, my qualifications: I have wanted to do Actuarial Science since I was in Form 4. In college, I did my research and I have looked at the qualifications provided in the UK, US, Australia and Malaysia. I have now finished my final year in Actuarial Science in the UK. I have interned in an insurance company in Malaysia as well as in my current location. And I have been in your shoes before.

To get the ball rolling, here are some misconceptions that need to be cleared up:

1. I want to do Actuarial Science because I like Math.
This is the biggest misconception that people have about Actuarial Science. In actual fact, a good knowledge of Mathematics is necessary, but a great knowledge is not. In the UK, the first 8 professional papers are somewhat Maths-based, but the tougher papers at the end are all written papers, which require a good command of English, a good knowledge of the insurance industry and good critical thinking skills. Throughout my course, the most difficult branch of Maths we did was Calculus and Linear Algebra, and that is not saying much. When you do start working, you will realise that the only Math you need are mostly addition and subtraction. Computer Programming will be the most important skill you will ever need. And to all of those who says that they need Further Math in their A-Levels, I did Math, Economics and Law. If you like Math, do a Mathematics degree.

2. I want to do Actuarial Science because the pay is good.
True, we have one of the highest starting salaries in the business world. Not by much though. The thing is, a qualified actuary does earn a lot. But to get that qualification, one has to pass professional papers, and those are not easy by a mile. The average time it takes to pass all your papers in Malaysia is around 6 years, depending on how good you are. (Some do take more than 10 years) And truth be told, all other professions will be able to earn a satisfactory remuneration within 10 years. If you want the money, go into Investment Banking. In a magazine which I have read, in business, while all other financial workers are paying off their mortgage for their first house, Investment Bankers are buying their second home.

3. I can pass all my professional exams if I work hard enough.
I want to believe this. I really do want to believe this. But with only 50 qualified actuaries in Malaysia, doesn’t it make you doubt that the only reason people are failing is because of a lack of effort? Studying is easy enough. Working is easy enough. Studying while working is not. While I was working in Malaysia, a colleague of mine works from 9 to 7 everyday, if he is lucky. On his way to and back from work, he studies on the LRT. If there is overtime, he will need to stay back and continue working. On weekends, he studies. At night, after being thoroughly exhausted at work, he studies. And while doing all these, he needs to find time for his girlfriend, family and friends. Now, ask yourself this: can you picture yourself doing that for a year? 3 years? 10 years?

I am really glad I chose this course. I know I would spend half my time working staring in a computer at spreadsheets. I know it will be a hard few years in front of me. I also know that I want nothing more than to qualify as a professional actuary, as I do love what I do very much. But I wished I knew what I was in for before I made the decision. And I do hope that people who read this will have the ability to make an informed decision about the course that is Actuarial Science.
*
So what course should I take in order to go into Investment Banking?
loudness.jr
post Mar 27 2012, 11:45 PM

New Member
*
Newbie
3 posts

Joined: Mar 2012
QUOTE(monkeyseemonkeydo @ May 23 2009, 04:59 PM)
I'm going to try to answer your questions. First and foremost, a degree in Actuarial Science is not necessary for a career in Actuarial Science. The only reason why people choose to do a degree in Actuarial Science is because they want exemptions from professional papers and want a leg up in them. However, I know for a fact that UK companies do not specifically employ students who did Actuarial Science - they hire people who have any Mathematical background. This is because the papers which you get exemptions from (CT1 - 8) are not difficult. In fact, CT7, the economics paper is just a simpler version of the A Levels Economics Paper! I know people who complete their CTs in a year and a half worth of studying, without any exemptions. One more problem I encounter when having a degree in Actuarial Science is that you pigeon hole yourself into that profession. It doesn't allow you to diversify into many other financial branches as it is so specialised in its own way, and that might be hard for a person who wants to find a job which is not actuarial-related in the future. Truth be told, I applied to do Mathematics in Cambridge as well, and if I had gotten the offer, would have accepted it straightaway.

It is good that you are trying to find out that if it is Maths that you like, or is it AS. Actuary's main industry is insurance. They are risk managers, they try to maintain the solvency of the company by managing the risk effectively. In a nutshell, the work that an actuary does in insurance can be divided into two - Pricing and Valuation. In Pricing, actuaries have to price insurance products so that the company will make a profit. This is not as easy as it sounds because the way insurance works, the company only suffers a loss in the future, and it is up to an actuary to price the product in a way that it is improbable for the company to go bankrupt anytime in the future. That is why we have projections and forecasts. In Valuation, actuaries need to take the premiums that people pay to invest in the best possible assets. This is necessary for the company to make a profit, because many products only allow to break-even, and it is up to the actuary to find the most valuable financial assets to invest in. There are consultant and contractor actuaries as well. They move from company to company advising insurance companies on how best to price their products, how they value their products, how they meet regulation, etc... They are one of the most well-paid people in the field. An actuary can become Chief Financial Officer and eventually CEO of a company. The fact is that insurance companies need us. We are the experts when it comes to the financial matters of an insurance firm.
Do let me know if you require more information.

I like the work. I like the challenge. I like the fact that I have different stuff thrown at me everyday. Sometimes, it does come to a point when I ask myself if it is worth it, especially having to come back from work and put myself in front of books. But I genuinely love the job I am given, and I really don't see myself doing anything else. I think it is the interest that keeps me here, and the fact that I do like applying Mathematics in practical business problems that helps me maintain my interest in the field. Plus, the fact that once I qualify, I'll get a FIA behind my name, which is pretty cool.


Added on May 23, 2009, 5:04 pm

No, that is not true. If that were true, we will be out of work in a few years time, when all the young guns come and take over our positions.

Back in Malaysia, due to the low pass rates, there are usually around 1 - 2 qualified actuaries and many actuarial students in each company. I believe that AIA has around 10 qualified actuaries. In the UK, my team alone had 6 qualifed actuaries. And we were only one really really small part of the company, which I believe had around 60 qualified actuaries alone.

Actuaries have the highest turnover I have ever seen. This is because they are so demanded that they just pretty much move from company to company in search of higher pay.
*
i know the risk to be an actuarist in malaysia, but i won't give up..

LightningFist
post Mar 28 2012, 06:29 AM

Minion of the Damned
Group Icon
VIP
3,965 posts

Joined: Apr 2009
QUOTE(meishien5602 @ Feb 3 2012, 06:52 PM)
So what course should I take in order to go into Investment Banking?
*
Finance. Either Capital Markets or Quantitative Finance, or both. In any case you should study the fundamentals (Corporate Finance, Derivatives, Capital and Debt Markets, Money Markets, Investment and Portfolio Management, Valuation etc).

Economics. Traditional Economics is fine, loads of people study that. But some Finance specialisation or classes would be helpful. Financial Economics in particular would be nice, and more Econometrics.

Some come from Accounting or Actuarial backgrounds. In IB Accounting knowledge is useful (financial analysis, balance sheets etc) but they aren't Accounting firms - they are bankers, and they use Finance knowledge... a lot of these fields (Business, Management, Commerce, Finance, Economics, Accounting) have theory or conceptual overlap. Some Actuarial students have almost the same thing as Finance students anyway, on top of their Actuarial knowledge.

Law.

Business or Management (not Human Resources).

Computer Science or Computer Engineering.

Engineering.

Physics.

Mathematics, Statistics, Operational Research, Mathematical Finance, Mathematical Economics. Yes, a lot of this may be highly theoretical (as opposed to Computational Finance) but that doesn't mean they won't hire you if you're good. Besides Finance starts from theory and anything used in industry is just an extension of such theory.

Obviously for those Science courses you'll need to demonstrate some strong interest in Finance in addition to high ability/interest in Maths.

In almost all of these (except Finance/Actuarial) I suspect most graduates would have not much Finance knowledge. This is not an issue if you're new, after all even Language graduates are hired (they obviously come from top schools like Cambridge), because IB is about straddling clients and Finance. Obviously there would be a degree of training.
justastudent
post Mar 29 2012, 08:24 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
30 posts

Joined: Mar 2012
hey, um... i'm currently taking up my A-levels now and the subjects are maths, further maths and physics.

i really like maths a lot and also statistics. that's why i had always wanted to pursue a degree in actuarial science.

however, after looking at this post, i started to wonder. i'm not sure whether should i go for actuarial science or statistics or just mathematics.

some help please?
LightningFist
post Mar 29 2012, 09:12 PM

Minion of the Damned
Group Icon
VIP
3,965 posts

Joined: Apr 2009
QUOTE(justastudent @ Mar 29 2012, 08:24 PM)
hey, um... i'm currently taking up my A-levels now and the subjects are maths, further maths and physics.

i really like maths a lot and also statistics. that's why i had always wanted to pursue a degree in actuarial science.

however, after looking at this post, i started to wonder. i'm not sure whether should i go for actuarial science or statistics or just mathematics.

some help please?
*
Do you like Finance? Things like Investment, Stocks, Options, Swaps, Currencies, Rates? Because you could get into that from Act Sci, it doesn't have to be pricing life insurance, general, reinsurance, or valuation. Act Sci also has a small element of Economics and Accounting (only the basics). So you pretty much study the fundamentals of Business/Commerce. Finance and Investment, Pensions, Life Insurance, Healthcare Insurance, General Insurance, and Enterprise Risk Management are pretty much the practice areas, if you do not go into banking.

Maths degree probably has a significant component of Statistics.

Statistics degree would be closer to an Actuarial degree more than Maths. But an Actuarial degree uses Statistics with a focus on insurance, investment, and risk. Statistics alone just has non-specific topics, like Maths. Different from Applied Mathematics, Mathematical Finance, Mathematical Economics, Maths and Stats for Finance, Computational Finance, Quantitative Finance etc.

What you probably realise that all of these can eventually lead to the same thing if you want it to, except studying Act Sci may lead to exemptions, and Maths or Stats are not applied into any specific field. Mathematicians and Statisticians are often employed as quants or financial engineers. Not having the Finance knowledge is not an issue, being able to absorb it later on is enough.




justastudent
post Mar 29 2012, 09:18 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
30 posts

Joined: Mar 2012
um... im not really exposed to the finance so i couldnt say i like it or not.

like you said, Act. Sci. may lead to exemptions, does that means that i can have a few exams down by the time i graduated from uni?
LightningFist
post Mar 29 2012, 09:43 PM

Minion of the Damned
Group Icon
VIP
3,965 posts

Joined: Apr 2009
QUOTE(justastudent @ Mar 29 2012, 09:18 PM)
um... im not really exposed to the finance so i couldnt say i like it or not.

like you said, Act. Sci. may lead to exemptions, does that means that i can have a few exams down by the time i graduated from uni?
*
Yeah. Irish schools give out the most, because they may exceed the CTs (or Part I) to CAs - probably means their degrees are most Actuarial.

Australian schools (all 5 except Monash) have the full 8 CTs.

British schools sometimes have the full 8, or very very few. Big schools like LSE and Warwick only have 7.

British system -> you can even get ST exemptions after CAs

Australian system -> Part I = CTs, Part II can be done by studying at a couple unis, Part III is self-done, like British SAs


Just look at Maths degrees, and Stats and Actuarial degrees. Then look at the individual subjects or classes they do. Maybe Maths will have Differential Geometry and Topology, Mechanics etc, Actuarial will have Finance, Applied Statistics. Statistics is common to both but again, the difference will be the application.
justastudent
post Mar 29 2012, 10:15 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
30 posts

Joined: Mar 2012
QUOTE(LightningFist @ Mar 29 2012, 09:43 PM)
Yeah. Irish schools give out the most, because they may exceed the CTs (or Part I) to CAs - probably means their degrees are most Actuarial.

Australian schools (all 5 except Monash) have the full 8 CTs.

British schools sometimes have the full 8, or very very few. Big schools like LSE and Warwick only have 7.

British system -> you can even get ST exemptions after CAs

Australian system -> Part I = CTs, Part II can be done by studying at a couple unis, Part III is self-done, like British SAs
Just look at Maths degrees, and Stats and Actuarial degrees. Then look at the individual subjects or classes they do. Maybe Maths will have Differential Geometry and Topology, Mechanics etc, Actuarial will have Finance, Applied Statistics. Statistics is common to both but again, the difference will be the application.
*
so u mean if i study in ANU or Melbourne University, i can have exemptions for the full 8 CTs? how bout the VEEs? is it covered as well?

btw, i like pure maths more than mechanics or stuffs like that. do u think it's suitable for me to take actuarial science? or should i go for maths instead?

thanks for answering me (= smile.gif


Added on March 29, 2012, 10:49 pm
QUOTE(LightningFist @ Nov 11 2010, 05:55 PM)
An actuarial degree is irrelevant. You are an actuary if you work or worked as an actuary, and to work as one you have to be qualified, either as an Associate or Fellow (in the UK), or elsewhere.

To be a new Associate of the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries (The Actuarial Profession) you need to:

- Have passed or be exempted for all 9 CT papers
- Have passed or be exempted for all 3 CA papers
- Complete one year's worth of work-based skills in the four key dimensions of practical application of actuarial skills, professional and ethical, communication and commercial.
- Attend a one-day professionalism course for Associates

To be a new Fellow you need to:

- Have passed or be exempted from any 2 (in one case 3) ST papers
- Have passed 1 SA paper
- Fulfill the work-based skills requirement (includes 3 years supervised actuarial work)
- Attend a two-day professionalism course within 12 months of being admitted as a Fellow
*
[QUOTE]


btw, like what u said above, is the format the same for SOA, FIA and IAA?
is part III the part to be done for me to be a new fellow or just a new associate?
and which is part II?

sorry and thanks for spending ur time to answer my questions haha

This post has been edited by justastudent: Mar 29 2012, 10:49 PM
LightningFist
post Mar 30 2012, 05:23 AM

Minion of the Damned
Group Icon
VIP
3,965 posts

Joined: Apr 2009
[quote=justastudent,Mar 29 2012, 10:15 PM]
so u mean if i study in ANU or Melbourne University, i can have exemptions for the full 8 CTs? how bout the VEEs? is it covered as well?

btw, i like pure maths more than mechanics or stuffs like that. do u think it's suitable for me to take actuarial science? or should i go for maths instead?

thanks for answering me (= smile.gif


Added on March 29, 2012, 10:49 pm
[QUOTE]
btw, like what u said above, is the format the same for SOA, FIA and IAA?
is part III the part to be done for me to be a new fellow or just a new associate?
and which is part II?

sorry and thanks for spending ur time to answer my questions haha
*

[/quote]

You'll have to look it up. SOA is different from the UK institute, IAA only shares the CTs.

People doing a Maths degree would probably say the Maths in Act Sci is nothing... but it could be completely true, Act Sci is not a study of Maths. It is Insurance Maths, incorporating Financial Maths, Probability and Statistics, with basic principles of Economics. When you are just deriving formulas it's going to feel like Maths, but all you're doing is using series and calculus... there's no trigonometry, geometry or whatever.
RyukA
post Mar 30 2012, 07:40 AM

On my way
****
Senior Member
612 posts

Joined: Jan 2010


QUOTE(LightningFist @ Mar 30 2012, 05:23 AM)
You'll have to look it up. SOA is different from the UK institute, IAA only shares the CTs.

People doing a Maths degree would probably say the Maths in Act Sci is nothing... but it could be completely true, Act Sci is not a study of Maths. It is Insurance Maths, incorporating Financial Maths, Probability and Statistics, with basic principles of Economics. When you are just deriving formulas it's going to feel like Maths, but all you're doing is using series and calculus... there's no trigonometry, geometry or whatever.
*
some minor corrections,

In actuarial, You will probably have to deal with all sorts of math a statistician will have to deal with,
common calculus & limiting distributions. Financial math for premium pricing, Generalised linear models &
mathematical statistics most of the time, sometimes Geometry & trigo, when you are fitting models
with (sin, cos, characteristics) or using certain algorithm when running simulations.
But dont worry, you dont do those everyday, Calculus? yes.

The building blocks of Actuarial Science, is reasonable, logical and fluent, with introductory economics,
some understanding of mechanism in finance. Although the statistics part is rather abstract at first, but ease up as you go on.
Insurance math stuff, is not abstract, just you know where you start, where to end, but there's a huge drama in between
the calculation to get there.

Math degree (I am assuming pure math, which is also whats special bout math anyway) mostly
give you deeper understanding on "stuff you dont really directly need in applied math" (if you are gonna work in some
boring corporation someday). You go deeper into fundamental principles of everything, learn techniques of proof,
bunch and bunch of abstract concept (not really tedious, but if you dont know it, you probably dont even know how to start).
I am not sure bout others, as I just do probability & measure theory. But can expect similar structure for all other pure math courses.
Well it also depends on the University, how theoretical or applied they want most math courses to be.

PS: Pre-U and high school math hardly tell anything. I have bunch of friends with 3A's struggle in 1st year pure math course.
And some of my 3rd yr math classmates hardly reach a TER of 82.
If you like to deal with numbers, stick with Actuarial, finance, stat, engineering. Or math will make your life miserable.

here's a small example of how both are different:

Actuarial Sci.
Here's f(x) a probability density function that describes
automobile claim, X. While here's f(y) another Prob. density function
to describe the similar automobile claim, X.
Provided is 120 claim size data that are assumed to be independent.
Run a suitable test to decide which model fits the claim distribution more adequate. Explain.

Math
Using similar argument in Axiom of Choice,
Prove or disprove that there exist a probability measure Q(x), from Powerset(Real) -> [0,1] such that
F(x) := Q((-inf,x]) is a continous function.


LightningFist
post Mar 30 2012, 09:27 AM

Minion of the Damned
Group Icon
VIP
3,965 posts

Joined: Apr 2009
QUOTE(RyukA @ Mar 30 2012, 07:40 AM)
some minor corrections,

In actuarial, You will probably have to deal with all sorts of math a statistician will have to deal with,
common calculus & limiting distributions. Financial math for premium pricing, Generalised linear models &
mathematical statistics most of the time, sometimes Geometry & trigo, when you are fitting models
with (sin, cos, characteristics) or using certain algorithm when running simulations.
But dont worry, you dont do those everyday, Calculus? yes.

The building blocks of Actuarial Science, is reasonable, logical and fluent, with introductory economics,
some understanding of mechanism in finance. Although the statistics part is rather abstract at first, but ease up as you go on.
Insurance math stuff, is not abstract, just you know where you start, where to end, but there's a huge drama in between
the calculation to get there.

Math degree (I am assuming pure math, which is also whats special bout math anyway) mostly
give you deeper understanding on "stuff you dont really directly need in applied math" (if you are gonna work in some
boring corporation someday). You go deeper into fundamental principles of everything, learn techniques of proof,
bunch and bunch of abstract concept (not really tedious, but if you dont know it, you probably dont even know how to start).
I am not sure bout others, as I just do probability & measure theory. But can expect similar structure for all other pure math courses.
Well it also depends on the University, how theoretical or applied they want most math courses to be.

PS: Pre-U and high school math hardly tell anything. I have bunch of friends with 3A's struggle in 1st year pure math course.
And some of my 3rd yr math classmates hardly reach a TER of 82.
If you like to deal with numbers, stick with Actuarial, finance, stat, engineering. Or math will make your life miserable.

here's a small example of how both are different:

Actuarial Sci.
Here's f(x) a probability density function that describes
automobile claim, X. While here's f(y) another Prob. density function
to describe the similar automobile claim, X.
Provided is 120 claim size data that are assumed to be independent.
Run a suitable test to decide which model fits the claim distribution more adequate. Explain.

Math
Using similar argument in Axiom of Choice,
Prove or disprove that there exist a probability measure Q(x), from Powerset(Real) -> [0,1] such that
F(x) := Q((-inf,x]) is a continous function.
*
My only consolation is that I won't do Advanced Derivatives Pricing?
RyukA
post Mar 30 2012, 12:58 PM

On my way
****
Senior Member
612 posts

Joined: Jan 2010


QUOTE(LightningFist @ Mar 30 2012, 09:27 AM)
My only consolation is that I won't do Advanced Derivatives Pricing?
*
You can, if you want to be prepared for IB.


by the way some of the difference on AS and math is for TS, as I assume
you must be an expert (sort of) in knowing the difference between the 2 by now. lol
justastudent
post Mar 30 2012, 05:24 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
30 posts

Joined: Mar 2012
ok guys.... i'm still lost lol
so basically, i study 3/4 years for my degree (if i'm taking up actuarial science) and while i am studying, i pass my professional papers as long as i do good in my exams to get exemptions.
then after, i start working and finish up my professional papers.
is this true?

can someone tell me a little bout finance for actuarial science 'cause i have no idea what is it like at all... =.=
LightningFist
post Mar 30 2012, 05:32 PM

Minion of the Damned
Group Icon
VIP
3,965 posts

Joined: Apr 2009
QUOTE(justastudent @ Mar 30 2012, 05:24 PM)
ok guys.... i'm still lost lol
so basically, i study 3/4 years for my degree (if i'm taking up actuarial science) and while i am studying, i pass my professional papers as long as i do good in my exams to get exemptions.
then after, i start working and finish up my professional papers.
is this true?

can someone tell me a little bout finance for actuarial science 'cause i have no idea what is it like at all... =.=
*
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Finance

Finance in Act Sci is no different from Finance itself.

But it is not "Finance" in the context of the Finance Departments of some companies, which do accounting and whatever. Finance can be budgeting, valuation, asset and liability matching, investment, risk management etc. That's why everyone doing Finance or Actuarial is supposed to have at least a single class of Accounting - to learn Accounting basics like balance sheets, financial analysis ratios, financial statements and reporting, because of regulatory requirements and asset/liability knowledge. Strange that LSE, king of undergraduate studies in anything remotely related to or geared towards Economics and Banking in Europe, and known for that worldwide, does not have the CT2 exemption.
justastudent
post Mar 30 2012, 05:42 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
30 posts

Joined: Mar 2012
right... um... so if i'm not that into finance, will you suggest me go for statistics instead or finance is not a really big part in actuarial science so it's still ok?
thanks a lot ^.^
LightningFist
post Mar 30 2012, 06:07 PM

Minion of the Damned
Group Icon
VIP
3,965 posts

Joined: Apr 2009
QUOTE(justastudent @ Mar 30 2012, 05:42 PM)
right... um... so if i'm not that into finance, will you suggest me go for statistics instead or finance is not a really big part in actuarial science so it's still ok?
thanks a lot ^.^
*
Finance in Actuarial is relatively small. Introductory Corporate Finance, Derivatives, Investment. Basic concepts needed for valuation, risk management, and learning about markets and investment strategies. It doesn't have to go further than this.

I think I would get bored to death in a Statistics degree.

Hey do you mind refreshing my mind with a little math? You're good at it right? Problem is if you don't use it then after a while you get rusty.

A = B exp® (exponential)

Take natural logs of both sides.

r = lnA - lnB = ln(A/B)

It's not possible to get lnA = rlnB at all right? Damn these lecturers.
justastudent
post Mar 30 2012, 06:13 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
30 posts

Joined: Mar 2012
so it's still ok for me to take actuarial science then? =P

eh.... i haven't learn bout exponential yet lol
cant help much sorry >.<

fino_abama
post Mar 30 2012, 06:13 PM

On my way
****
Senior Member
520 posts

Joined: Sep 2009


QUOTE(LightningFist @ Mar 30 2012, 06:07 PM)
Finance in Actuarial is relatively small. Introductory Corporate Finance, Derivatives, Investment. Basic concepts needed for valuation, risk management, and learning about markets and investment strategies. It doesn't have to go further than this.

I think I would get bored to death in a Statistics degree.

Hey do you mind refreshing my mind with a little math? You're good at it right? Problem is if you don't use it then after a while you get rusty.

A = B exp®        (exponential)

Take natural logs of both sides.

r = lnA - lnB = ln(A/B)

It's not possible to get lnA = rlnB at all right? Damn these lecturers.
*
It can only be ln A = r + ln B. i think your lecturer left out the plus sign

LightningFist
post Mar 30 2012, 07:13 PM

Minion of the Damned
Group Icon
VIP
3,965 posts

Joined: Apr 2009
QUOTE(fino_abama @ Mar 30 2012, 06:13 PM)
It can only be ln A = r + ln B. i think your lecturer left out the plus sign
*
Seems so silly and trivial to ask a Year 10 question like this right? But this teacher wrote the frigging book I pulled that out of...
RyukA
post Mar 30 2012, 10:25 PM

On my way
****
Senior Member
612 posts

Joined: Jan 2010


QUOTE(LightningFist @ Mar 30 2012, 06:07 PM)
Finance in Actuarial is relatively small. Introductory Corporate Finance, Derivatives, Investment. Basic concepts needed for valuation, risk management, and learning about markets and investment strategies. It doesn't have to go further than this.

I think I would get bored to death in a Statistics degree.

Hey do you mind refreshing my mind with a little math? You're good at it right? Problem is if you don't use it then after a while you get rusty.

A = B exp®        (exponential)

Take natural logs of both sides.

r = lnA - lnB = ln(A/B)

It's not possible to get lnA = rlnB at all right? Damn these lecturers.
*
A statistician knows how to joke alot better and in a more comprehendable way than an actuary, traditionally.
Well, I observe that from a sample of my lecturers. hahahaha.
it usually goes this way
Applied statistics < Specialised statistics< Mathematical statistics

Finance is basically an application of statistics. With some crap theories, contributed by economists as well. Hahaha.

Dont be too concerned bout dealing with exponents,
till today I still refer to notes to do integration by part and integration of exponents. lol




LightningFist
post Mar 30 2012, 10:40 PM

Minion of the Damned
Group Icon
VIP
3,965 posts

Joined: Apr 2009
QUOTE(RyukA @ Mar 30 2012, 10:25 PM)
A statistician knows how to joke alot better and in a more comprehendable way than an actuary, traditionally.
Well, I observe that from a sample of my lecturers. hahahaha.
it usually goes this way
Applied statistics < Specialised statistics< Mathematical statistics

Finance is basically an application of statistics. With some crap theories, contributed by economists as well. Hahaha.

Dont be too concerned bout dealing with exponents,
till today I still refer to notes to do integration by part and integration of exponents. lol
*
Can't wait to relearn by parts >.<

These guys really suck at Math


Added on March 30, 2012, 10:42 pm
QUOTE(justastudent @ Mar 30 2012, 06:13 PM)
so it's still ok for me to take actuarial science then? =P

eh.... i haven't learn bout exponential yet lol
cant help much sorry >.<
*
But if you're doing A Level Maths or Further you must definitely know much more than this... Year 10 stuff... unless you've forgotten everything like me haha

This post has been edited by LightningFist: Mar 30 2012, 10:42 PM
fino_abama
post Mar 30 2012, 11:07 PM

On my way
****
Senior Member
520 posts

Joined: Sep 2009


QUOTE(LightningFist @ Mar 30 2012, 07:13 PM)
Seems so silly and trivial to ask a Year 10 question like this right? But this teacher wrote the frigging book I pulled that out of...
*
Must have been a typo
LightningFist
post Mar 30 2012, 11:12 PM

Minion of the Damned
Group Icon
VIP
3,965 posts

Joined: Apr 2009
QUOTE(fino_abama @ Mar 30 2012, 11:07 PM)
Must have been a typo
*
Hmm well it's been printed more than a few times, and there are more than a few writers, along with claims from a certain instructor that mistakes are never made (although we get them too frequently). A very large and unusual typo... how does a mistake like that happen...
RyukA
post Mar 30 2012, 11:41 PM

On my way
****
Senior Member
612 posts

Joined: Jan 2010


QUOTE(justastudent @ Mar 30 2012, 05:24 PM)
ok guys.... i'm still lost lol
so basically, i study 3/4 years for my degree (if i'm taking up actuarial science) and while i am studying, i pass my professional papers as long as i do good in my exams to get exemptions.
then after, i start working and finish up my professional papers.
is this true?

can someone tell me a little bout finance for actuarial science 'cause i have no idea what is it like at all... =.=
*
basically you study 3 or 4 years for your degree, to learn the building blocks of actuarial science,
that is if you do well, you get exempted for papers case by case. hence, you will get your PART I of actuarial
qualification done (if you do well),
PART II and III are taken externally (although, there's some school that exempt for Part II as well, with a higher cut-off exemption grade).
If you are lifeless and/or highly intellectual and/or an expert in AS and/or just being lucky,
you might be able to finish all 3 PARTS within 7 years (std. dev 1.4 years).

Or, you can give up, and take CFA or CPA or some other qualification instead. Which is rumoured to be, what
people usually do.
PArt II passing rate is around 40%, Part III is 33%. for reference.


Actuarial science is a study of methods to manage financial risk. From interest rates, up to premium pricing.
Everything in finance, is incorporated as a finance applicable in actuarial science if thats what you are asking.
Oh, except we dont do much of single cash flow stuff, or financial calculators, perhaps these are too mainstream.

all you get most of the time is bunch of horrible algebra, and some tables to work with. maybe.
fino_abama
post Mar 31 2012, 01:11 AM

On my way
****
Senior Member
520 posts

Joined: Sep 2009


QUOTE(LightningFist @ Mar 30 2012, 11:12 PM)
Hmm well it's been printed more than a few times, and there are more than a few writers, along with claims from a certain instructor that mistakes are never made (although we get them too frequently). A very large and unusual typo... how does a mistake like that happen...
*
If the question was "If A = B exp® show that A = r ln B", it's definitely a typo. Anyone who has studied logarithm can help you verify that.

justastudent
post Apr 1 2012, 12:32 AM

New Member
*
Junior Member
30 posts

Joined: Mar 2012
maybe i did? haha cant rmb anything at the moment though XP


Added on April 1, 2012, 12:33 am
QUOTE(RyukA @ Mar 30 2012, 11:41 PM)
basically you study 3 or 4 years for your degree, to learn the building blocks of actuarial science,
that is if you do well, you get exempted for papers case by case. hence, you will get your PART I of actuarial
qualification done (if you do well),
PART II and III are taken externally (although, there's some school that exempt for Part II as well, with a higher cut-off exemption grade).
If you are lifeless and/or highly intellectual and/or an expert in AS and/or just being lucky,
you might be able to finish all 3 PARTS within 7 years (std. dev 1.4 years).

Or, you can give up, and take CFA or CPA or some other qualification instead. Which is rumoured to be, what
people usually do.
PArt II passing rate is around 40%, Part III is 33%. for reference.
Actuarial science is a study of methods to manage financial risk. From interest rates, up to premium pricing.
Everything in finance, is incorporated as a finance applicable in actuarial science if thats what you are asking.
Oh, except we dont do much of single cash flow stuff, or financial calculators, perhaps these are too mainstream.

all you get most of the time is bunch of horrible algebra, and some tables to work with. maybe.
*
right, thanks a lot =D

This post has been edited by justastudent: Apr 1 2012, 12:33 AM
MeowNYC
post Apr 1 2012, 04:02 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
113 posts

Joined: Jan 2012
I am the SPM leaver. A question I'd like to ask here after seeing some posts :
Q : After you complete the degree in AC, u are nt an actuary yet ? o.o
Isn't it u need to take a professional exam like SOA, etc to become an actuary ?

How about UTAR AC degree? I heard there's a SOA examination.
LightningFist
post Apr 1 2012, 04:09 PM

Minion of the Damned
Group Icon
VIP
3,965 posts

Joined: Apr 2009
QUOTE(MeowNYC @ Apr 1 2012, 06:02 PM)
I am the SPM leaver. A question I'd like to ask here after seeing some posts :
Q : After you complete the degree in AC, u are nt an actuary yet ? o.o
Isn't it u need to take a professional exam like SOA, etc to become an actuary ?

How about UTAR AC degree? I heard there's a SOA examination.
*
It is possible to be an actuary after a degree, but not necessarily entirely because of the degree. If you finish all the relevant exams and any exemptions where applicable for an associate of the institute and meet all the other requirements then you're an actuary in the same sense as a person who has completed his MD is a doctor while someone who has completed his BEng/MEng is an engineer by training.

No degree will make you an actuary (i.e. if you don't do anything external beyond the degree). It's not just the academic exams, there are work experience and training and seminar requirements.

For the UK/Australia, many exams can be done through a degree. So that get's you part of the way towards becoming an actuary.
justastudent
post Apr 1 2012, 10:01 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
30 posts

Joined: Mar 2012
just curious, let's say i'm taking the professional paper from IAA, that means i got to do part I, part II and part III to become a fellow right?
however, i can get my part I and part II done in university, so does that mean that when i graduated, i'll be an associate?
RyukA
post Apr 1 2012, 10:17 PM

On my way
****
Senior Member
612 posts

Joined: Jan 2010


QUOTE(justastudent @ Apr 1 2012, 10:01 PM)
just curious, let's say i'm taking the professional paper from IAA, that means i got to do part I, part II and part III to become a fellow right?
however, i can get my part I and part II done in university, so does that mean that when i graduated, i'll be an associate?
*
no.
you satisfy the Educational requirement for Part I and II, but you need to attend some required courses, working experience, a seminar module and stuff.
Provided you can pass through everything in single seating (thats if you are an awesome genius), you can finish everything in bout 6 years.

You need to clear even more specialised modules to be a fellow, while you need solid working experience for becoming an associate. Oh, and also dont forget all the assessments and papers.
justastudent
post Apr 1 2012, 11:27 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
30 posts

Joined: Mar 2012
QUOTE(RyukA @ Apr 1 2012, 10:17 PM)
no.
you satisfy the Educational requirement for Part I and II, but you need to attend some required courses, working experience, a seminar module and stuff.
Provided you can pass through everything in single seating (thats if you are an awesome genius), you can finish everything in bout 6 years.

You need to clear even more specialised modules to be a fellow, while you need solid working experience for becoming an associate. Oh, and also dont forget all the assessments and papers.
*
owh... ic ic ... thanks for clearing it up for me =D
saufisalleh
post Apr 2 2012, 01:24 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
6 posts

Joined: Apr 2012
Hey ! Anyone can help me? Which local university that prefer to study in actuarial science? Can someone list them?
RyukA
post Apr 2 2012, 09:24 PM

On my way
****
Senior Member
612 posts

Joined: Jan 2010


QUOTE(saufisalleh @ Apr 2 2012, 01:24 PM)
Hey ! Anyone can help me? Which local university that prefer to study in actuarial science? Can someone list them?
*
Local Private? or Local public?

UKM & UTAR are quite reputable. (among all the local ones, of course).

Want a good twinning programme, then go for HELP University.
saufisalleh
post Apr 3 2012, 10:51 AM

New Member
*
Junior Member
6 posts

Joined: Apr 2012
QUOTE(RyukA @ Apr 2 2012, 09:24 PM)
Local Private? or Local public?

UKM & UTAR are quite reputable. (among all the local ones, of course).

Want a good twinning programme, then go for HELP University.
*
Hmm..I want local Private smile.gif
Searingmage
post Apr 7 2012, 08:04 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,809 posts

Joined: Feb 2010


QUOTE(saufisalleh @ Apr 3 2012, 10:51 AM)
Hmm..I want local Private smile.gif
*
Local private you only have two choices, UTAR and UCSI.
I believe UTAR will be a better choice in this case as it is more established already.
saufisalleh
post Apr 8 2012, 07:30 AM

New Member
*
Junior Member
6 posts

Joined: Apr 2012
QUOTE(Searingmage @ Apr 7 2012, 08:04 PM)
Local private you only have two choices, UTAR and UCSI.
I believe UTAR will be a better choice in this case as it is more established already.
*
Thanks biggrin.gif
Which one course that relate to the actuarial science?
Searingmage
post Apr 21 2012, 11:25 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,809 posts

Joined: Feb 2010


QUOTE(saufisalleh @ Apr 8 2012, 07:30 AM)
Thanks  biggrin.gif
Which one course that relate to the actuarial science?
*
Statistic will be the most related I guess..
But I can't give an objective opinion as I've only take AS course before only.
RyukA
post Apr 22 2012, 08:50 AM

On my way
****
Senior Member
612 posts

Joined: Jan 2010


QUOTE(saufisalleh @ Apr 8 2012, 07:30 AM)
Thanks  biggrin.gif
Which one course that relate to the actuarial science?
*
What are u trying to ask?

On another note,
Btw existing UTAR students, is there any (postgrad, undergrad) research program that UTAR implicitly or explicitly offers?

-Doesnt matter if its Non-award. In fields of Statistics, Actuarial, Finance, Mathematics.
LightningFist
post Apr 22 2012, 09:43 AM

Minion of the Damned
Group Icon
VIP
3,965 posts

Joined: Apr 2009
QUOTE(saufisalleh @ Apr 8 2012, 09:30 AM)
Thanks  biggrin.gif
Which one course that relate to the actuarial science?
*
For degrees, concentrations, and majors, there are many:

Actuarial Science or Actuarial Studies (also with/and Risk Management, Insurance, Maths, Statistics, Economics, Finance etc)
Actuarial Mathematics
Actuarial Management
Actuarial Statistics
Actuarial Finance
Insurance and Risk Management
Mathematics, Operational Research, Statistics and Economics
Financial and Insurance Mathematics
Mathematical Risk Management

Others that are less closely related you may be interested in:

Statistics
Business Mathematics and Statistics
Statistics with Finance
Quantitative Finance
Applied Mathematics
Financial Engineering
Data Mining
Statistical Computing
Applied Finance
Finance
Financial Mathematics
Mathematical Finance
Economics
Mathematics
Accounting
Commerce
Business
Science

Searingmage
post Apr 23 2012, 11:15 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,809 posts

Joined: Feb 2010


QUOTE(RyukA @ Apr 22 2012, 08:50 AM)
What are u trying to ask?

On another note,
Btw existing UTAR students, is there any (postgrad, undergrad) research program that UTAR implicitly or explicitly offers?

-Doesnt matter if its Non-award. In fields of Statistics, Actuarial, Finance, Mathematics.
*
IINM, there are applied maths, statistic etc.. No actuarial, finance not too sure..
mumeichan
post Apr 27 2012, 09:03 AM

Member
*******
Senior Member
4,152 posts

Joined: May 2005
Guys if you want to study for the actuarial exam, just buy a study guide and some textbooks. The degree doesn't matter so much. Unless it's an actuarial degree, the classes you take probably won't cover the same material anyway.
missjessie
post Jun 9 2012, 12:44 AM

New Member
*
Newbie
1 posts

Joined: Jun 2012
Hi, I am new here. smile.gif

I studied American Degree Transfer Program(INTI) majoring in Actuarial Science for five semesters and I should be getting ready to complete my degree in America (University of Nebraska Lincoln) in this August. But Im worried that the expenses for the 2years program there will be a huge burden to my family.

Looks like for now, studying overseas and local doesn't really make a big differences. For example, decades ago, companies will likely prefer to hire someone with a degree from overseas. So..I am considering to continue my studies in Malaysia(UTAR/ UCSI). I actually prefer UKM but Im afraid I that couldnt reach their qualifications (STPM/Matriculation) to apply. Im kinda lost here.

I would like to ask opinions from all if I am on the right direction to give up on studying Actuarial Science abroad and to study at local universities such as UTAR?


Searingmage
post Jun 10 2012, 08:36 AM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,809 posts

Joined: Feb 2010


QUOTE(missjessie @ Jun 9 2012, 12:44 AM)
Hi, I am new here. smile.gif

I studied American Degree Transfer Program(INTI) majoring in Actuarial Science for five semesters and I should be getting ready to complete my degree in America (University of Nebraska Lincoln) in this August. But Im worried that the expenses for the 2years program there will be a huge burden to my family.

Looks like for now, studying overseas and local doesn't really make a big differences. For example, decades ago, companies will likely prefer to hire someone with a degree from overseas. So..I am considering to continue my studies in Malaysia(UTAR/ UCSI). I actually prefer UKM but Im afraid I that couldnt reach their qualifications (STPM/Matriculation) to apply. Im kinda lost here.

I would like to ask opinions from all if I am on the right direction to give up on studying Actuarial Science abroad and to study at local universities such as UTAR?
*
My personal experience is that it doesn't really matter which university you come from.
Even if you come from the best university in the world but progress poorly in your external, employer usually still prefer those with more external papers.
LightningFist
post Jun 10 2012, 07:32 PM

Minion of the Damned
Group Icon
VIP
3,965 posts

Joined: Apr 2009
Quite right. To be an actuary the paper qualifications and experience components are very important, more than the "top school" factor that other fields (banking, finance, consulting, law) sometimes select for in addition to excellent results.

In fact, you'll notice many top schools don't even teach Actuarial Science! In Britain I can think of LSE and Warwick University, but they don't even have (for now) full exemptions! The major ones are City University (Cass Business School) and Kent. Although, if you did Mathematics at Cambridge University you might have as much of a shot for en entry level role as someone who did an Actuarial undergrad. So long as you show the willingness and potential to do exams. It's not about the degree - Accounting or Finance backgrounds are common too. In the US you can go to Wharton but it's not a straight Actuarial degree. Plus no major exemptions in the US anyway. NUS only has a joint Actuarial degree. Australia has quite a few.
clumsyvonne
post Jun 12 2012, 03:32 PM

New Member
*
Newbie
3 posts

Joined: Nov 2006
I read a couple of posts on the top that mentioned that they're considering majoring in Mathematics based on their SPM education. I don't think that's wise. I'm a year two student majoring in Applied Mathematics in NUS and I can tell you that you should never ever base university level mathematics to that of SPM. I personally did not take A-level so I can't comment on that. I did ontario sec sch diploma as my pre-u. Did rather well for advanced functions and calculus which turned out to be relatively useless in preparing me to the horrors of calculus in NUS.

I'm dabbling in IT right now as per requirement of my major. Might go into algorithms and e-commerce security. All I can say is that the perception that your degree is going to dictate your future career (not job) is quite naive. However, it is very important that whatever you plan on doing, you need to excel. If you find your grades amongst the average, do something extra. This is what I personally feel that Malaysian students are lacking.

P.S. in actuality, holding a degree in actuarial science does not mean you're a qualified actuary just as holding an engineering degree does not mean you're an engineer. A degree is no longer the highest level of education that will guarantee you a decent life. You need to learn how to market yourself.

This post has been edited by clumsyvonne: Jun 12 2012, 03:35 PM
dun_toi
post Jun 13 2012, 09:51 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
123 posts

Joined: Feb 2009
QUOTE(missjessie @ Jun 9 2012, 12:44 AM)
Hi, I am new here. smile.gif

I studied American Degree Transfer Program(INTI) majoring in Actuarial Science for five semesters and I should be getting ready to complete my degree in America (University of Nebraska Lincoln) in this August. But Im worried that the expenses for the 2years program there will be a huge burden to my family.

Looks like for now, studying overseas and local doesn't really make a big differences. For example, decades ago, companies will likely prefer to hire someone with a degree from overseas. So..I am considering to continue my studies in Malaysia(UTAR/ UCSI). I actually prefer UKM but Im afraid I that couldnt reach their qualifications (STPM/Matriculation) to apply. Im kinda lost here.

I would like to ask opinions from all if I am on the right direction to give up on studying Actuarial Science abroad and to study at local universities such as UTAR?
*
Study overseas will be better for your communication skill. You will learn to speak out in proper English and learn a lot more regarding finance industry and insurance industry. Besides, education in US focus more on team works and discussion and not just anything from the textbook. I had one professor who will release exam question based on real world stock market situation. I think professor in Nebraska-Lincoln is rather good(my friend is studying over there while I'm in another University). You would be able to pass all your preliminary papers within 2 years of your education over there if you work hard. There will be distractions of travelling around the states and making new friends but try to balance it and you will succeed. =)
numoh
post Jun 14 2012, 09:46 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
58 posts

Joined: Mar 2012
QUOTE(missjessie @ Jun 9 2012, 01:44 AM)
Hi, I am new here. smile.gif

I studied American Degree Transfer Program(INTI) majoring in Actuarial Science for five semesters and I should be getting ready to complete my degree in America (University of Nebraska Lincoln) in this August. But Im worried that the expenses for the 2years program there will be a huge burden to my family.

Looks like for now, studying overseas and local doesn't really make a big differences. For example, decades ago, companies will likely prefer to hire someone with a degree from overseas. So..I am considering to continue my studies in Malaysia(UTAR/ UCSI). I actually prefer UKM but Im afraid I that couldnt reach their qualifications (STPM/Matriculation) to apply. Im kinda lost here.

I would like to ask opinions from all if I am on the right direction to give up on studying Actuarial Science abroad and to study at local universities such as UTAR?
*
In your situation, I think either you sacrifice (a lot of money plus less time)=ADT or (less money plus a lot of time)=UTAR/local...

Based on what you have said, I assume that you come from the middle class of family.. If I were you, I will choose to study in local.. and of course, local U grads is not as attractive as oversea U.. but most of the employers do not really care which uni that u studied at if you have passed all the soa papers (if cant, try all the prelims).. which will make a big difference for you..

Jom.. we study harder for those difficult exams..
Vaedoris
post Jun 14 2012, 10:57 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
59 posts

Joined: May 2012
QUOTE(clumsyvonne @ Jun 12 2012, 03:32 PM)
I read a couple of posts on the top that mentioned that they're considering majoring in Mathematics based on their SPM education. I don't think that's wise. I'm a year two student majoring in Applied Mathematics in NUS and I can tell you that you should never ever base university level mathematics to that of SPM. I personally did not take A-level so I can't comment on that. I did ontario sec sch diploma as my pre-u. Did rather well for advanced functions and calculus which turned out to be relatively useless in preparing me to the horrors of calculus in NUS.

I'm dabbling in IT right now as per requirement of my major. Might go into algorithms and e-commerce security. All I can say is that the perception that your degree is going to dictate your future career (not job) is quite naive. However, it is very important that whatever you plan on doing, you need to excel. If you find your grades amongst the average, do something extra. This is what I personally feel that Malaysian students are lacking.

P.S. in actuality, holding a degree in actuarial science does not mean you're a qualified actuary just as holding an engineering degree does not mean you're an engineer. A degree is no longer the highest level of education that will guarantee you a decent life. You need to learn how to market yourself.
*
rclxms.gif rclxms.gif I've been wanting to say this for a long while. SPM mathematics, math and add math, are a joke. Many people think Add-math is hard? It's not even up to standard.

I can definitely understand the irony of wanting to take mathematics degree based on thinking it as a continuation of SPM level maths.

This post has been edited by Vaedoris: Jun 14 2012, 11:00 AM
RyukA
post Jun 14 2012, 02:05 PM

On my way
****
Senior Member
612 posts

Joined: Jan 2010


QUOTE(Vaedoris @ Jun 14 2012, 10:57 AM)
rclxms.gif  rclxms.gif I've been wanting to say this for a long while. SPM mathematics, math and add math, are a joke. Many people think Add-math is hard? It's not even up to standard.

I can definitely understand the irony of wanting to take mathematics degree based on thinking it as a continuation of SPM level maths.
*
Concepts are hard taught, if the presenter lacks ability to simplify jargons, and provide good illustration, examples.
For that I would say, it is perfectly normal to find Addmath hard at 1st attempt.
But lets be reasonable, paper-crunching doesnt help all the time. In fact its because of many wrong approach to "understand" the intuition behind these sylabus, is what made even some of the straight A's (or rather A+++ in Math)
stuck at certain depth of mathematical study.
Rather than saying, Uni-level math & SPM level math is not comparable, I would say it definitely is, by common sense.
But that would in no way imply one's passion in Math (at SPM level) should be turned down, based on these differences.
Then again, what would 1st year mathematics be for? Each transition would be a bridge, but how big is the gap in between depend on alot of personal factor. So, I would suggest its rather abit early to tell, but failing is not a shame,
but rather admitting u learnt something, which others might had even avoided in the 1st place.
In respect to advanced courses, each prerequisite studies, and high school materials are building bricks of your foundation.

Never try, never know.


Vaedoris
post Jun 14 2012, 02:33 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
59 posts

Joined: May 2012
QUOTE(RyukA @ Jun 14 2012, 02:05 PM)
Concepts are hard taught, if the presenter lacks ability to simplify jargons, and provide good illustration, examples.
For that I would say, it is perfectly normal to find Addmath hard at 1st attempt.
But lets be reasonable, paper-crunching doesnt help all the time. In fact its because of many wrong approach to "understand" the intuition behind these sylabus, is what made even some of the straight A's (or rather A+++ in Math)
stuck at certain depth of mathematical study.
[cool.gifRather than saying, Uni-level math & SPM level math is not comparable, I would say it definitely is[/B], by common sense.
But that would in no way imply one's passion in Math (at SPM level) should be turned down, based on these differences.
Then again, what would 1st year mathematics be for? Each transition would be a bridge, but how big is the gap in between depend on alot of personal factor. So, I would suggest its rather abit early to tell, but failing is not a shame,
but rather admitting u learnt something, which others might had even avoided in the 1st place.
In respect to advanced courses, each prerequisite studies, and high school materials are building bricks of your foundation.

Never try, never know.
*
I am a recent university graduate and I know for sure what you claimed (highlighted) is not true even though I did my SPM back in 05.

Having said that, of course I HIGHLY agree that it is not a reason to turn down people's passion in Mathematics based on SPM maths.

I'm not sure why you brought up "failing" cause what I said didn't imply it.

SPM maths do (barely) give you some foundation about Math but the standard is dreadful. Simply dreadful. That's why I furiously (and not ashamed of it) think that SPM maths is a joke.
RyukA
post Jun 14 2012, 02:42 PM

On my way
****
Senior Member
612 posts

Joined: Jan 2010


QUOTE(Vaedoris @ Jun 14 2012, 02:33 PM)
I am a recent university graduate and I know for sure what you claimed (highlighted) is not true even though I did my SPM back in 05.

Having said that, of course I HIGHLY agree that it is not a reason to turn down people's passion in Mathematics based on SPM maths.

I'm not sure why you brought up "failing" cause what I said didn't imply it.

SPM maths do (barely) give you some foundation about Math but the standard is dreadful. Simply dreadful. That's why I furiously (and not ashamed of it) think that SPM maths is a joke.
*
"So, I would suggest its rather abit early to tell, but failing is not a shame,
but rather admitting u learnt something, which others might had even avoided in the 1st place."
general context.

cheers.
Vaedoris
post Jun 14 2012, 02:44 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
59 posts

Joined: May 2012
QUOTE(RyukA @ Jun 14 2012, 02:42 PM)
"So, I would suggest its rather abit early to tell, but failing is not a shame,
but rather admitting u learnt something, which others might had even avoided in the 1st place."
general context.

cheers.
*
I think you are talking about something I didn't.

What are you on about?
RyukA
post Jun 14 2012, 02:51 PM

On my way
****
Senior Member
612 posts

Joined: Jan 2010


QUOTE(Vaedoris @ Jun 14 2012, 02:44 PM)
I think you are talking about something I didn't.

What are you on about?
*
Everytime a word "suggest", would use upon expressing personal opinion, in a general context,
not necessarily be a response specific to particular individual but possibly on a general audience (in this case, likely future students that came across these posts for info).
What would be the problem of giving additional advice (given some observation of similar issue in the past), on top of
responding to a specific individual.

"So, I would suggest its rather abit early to tell, but failing is not a shame,
but rather admitting u learnt something, which others might had even avoided in the 1st place."
in this case, "u" refer to anyone reading it while facing the same dilema/issue.
And since u claimed to had graduated, it is obviously not in any way related to you.

There's a difference between forum posting, and PM, for which the latter is used for personal conversations.
I dont see a problem of me giving additional "advice" on top of my response.


alexwookw
post Jun 14 2012, 02:54 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
43 posts

Joined: Dec 2010


Enrolled for Actuarial Studies in Australia and eventually found out my interest more on Finance, so I switch to Finance instead.

My view: If you just want high pay, don't need to do Actuary, you can do well in Investment Banking. Also, Actuary starting pay might be high, but if your pay wont have a huge jump if you are forever on degree. And not many people get the professional qualifications. Demand wise, I have failed to follow up because I drop it in first year.

Someone mentioned to me there are only less than 100 actuaries in Malaysia right now, make me puzzles does insurance company really need so many? One of the reason I decided to switch as well.

Think twice for those who want to do this course. You might find yourself coping with a lot of stats and excel spreadsheet while others are enjoying their university life. LOL
Vaedoris
post Jun 14 2012, 02:55 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
59 posts

Joined: May 2012
QUOTE(RyukA @ Jun 14 2012, 02:51 PM)
Everytime a word "suggest", would use upon expressing personal opinion, in a general context,
not necessarily be a response specific to particular individual but possibly on a general audience (in this case, likely future students that came across these posts for info).
What would be the problem of giving additional advice (given some observation of similar issue in the past), on top of
responding to a specific individual.

"So, I would suggest its rather abit early to tell, but failing is not a shame,
but rather admitting u learnt something, which others might had even avoided in the 1st place."
in this case, "u" refer to anyone reading it while facing the same dilema/issue.
And since u claimed to had graduated, it is obviously not in any way related to you.

There's a difference between forum posting, and PM, for which the latter is used for personal conversations.
I dont see a problem of me giving additional "advice" on top of my response.
*
Okay.....

I rather get back on my topic. Your "suggestion" appeared at a random time.

Nothing wrong with it just somewhat out of context.

This post has been edited by Vaedoris: Jun 14 2012, 02:56 PM
ratloverice
post Jun 15 2012, 07:23 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Junior Member
804 posts

Joined: May 2010
I have a question to ask. It's about the syllabus of exam FM.

QUOTE
user posted image

This is the front page of the study manual that I downloaded. I thought Exam 2 only involves FM? Why is financial economics is included in this study manual too?

QUOTE
user posted image
Does it mean I only have to study from chapter 1 to 9 and don't need to care so much about chapter 10 to 19 ?

Thank you in advance.


P/S: It is ASM's study manual.

This post has been edited by ratloverice: Jun 15 2012, 07:25 PM
mumeichan
post Jun 15 2012, 10:42 PM

Member
*******
Senior Member
4,152 posts

Joined: May 2005
QUOTE(ratloverice @ Jun 15 2012, 07:23 PM)
I have a question to ask. It's about the syllabus of exam FM.
This is the front page of the study manual that I downloaded. I thought Exam 2 only involves FM? Why is financial economics is included in this study manual too?
Does it mean I only have to study from chapter 1 to 9 and don't need to care so much about chapter 10 to 19 ?

Thank you in advance.
P/S: It is ASM's study manual.
*
No it means you have to study all of it.
ratloverice
post Jun 15 2012, 10:51 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Junior Member
804 posts

Joined: May 2010
QUOTE(mumeichan @ Jun 15 2012, 10:42 PM)
No it means you have to study all of it.
*
I see. Hmm. Another question. I have ASM's study manual for exam P. It is the ninth edition. It only has 4 chapters, which are General Probabilities, Random Variables and Probability Distributions, Multivariate Distributions, and Risk Management and Insurance. May I know if it is real that exam P only includes such less chapters ?
RyukA
post Jun 16 2012, 12:28 AM

On my way
****
Senior Member
612 posts

Joined: Jan 2010


QUOTE(ratloverice @ Jun 15 2012, 10:51 PM)
I see. Hmm. Another question. I have ASM's study manual for exam P. It is the ninth edition. It only has 4 chapters, which are General Probabilities, Random Variables and Probability Distributions, Multivariate Distributions, and Risk Management and Insurance. May I know if it is real that exam P only includes such less chapters ?
*
For those always relying on Past year/old edition notes, manuals, have to keep in mind:
- Sylabus are subject to changes for each intake
- Always check with the official Sylabus outline
- study manuals & "3rd party" course notes are just a Additional preference, and should not be prioritised
on top of the Official Study material Recommended or provided by the institution.

SOA have a very good website to handle education related queries. Use it:
and check the sylabus corresponding the Exam you are expected to sit.

official:
http://www.soa.org/education/exam-req/edu-exam-p-detail.aspx

Their Recommended Info site:
http://www.beanactuary.org/exams/prelimina...robability-exam

Example: Exam-P 2012 Sept
http://www.beanactuary.org/exams/prelimina...Sept-exam-p.pdf

Now u can answer your own question.
H2O3
post Jun 16 2012, 10:03 AM

New Member
*
Junior Member
48 posts

Joined: Jul 2010
QUOTE(ratloverice @ Jun 15 2012, 10:51 PM)
I see. Hmm. Another question. I have ASM's study manual for exam P. It is the ninth edition. It only has 4 chapters, which are General Probabilities, Random Variables and Probability Distributions, Multivariate Distributions, and Risk Management and Insurance. May I know if it is real that exam P only includes such less chapters ?
*
9th edition is pretty old, try to get a new 1.
mumeichan
post Jun 16 2012, 10:27 AM

Member
*******
Senior Member
4,152 posts

Joined: May 2005
QUOTE(ratloverice @ Jun 15 2012, 10:51 PM)
I see. Hmm. Another question. I have ASM's study manual for exam P. It is the ninth edition. It only has 4 chapters, which are General Probabilities, Random Variables and Probability Distributions, Multivariate Distributions, and Risk Management and Insurance. May I know if it is real that exam P only includes such less chapters ?
*
They have the syllabus on their website. I don't think it changes that much for P exam. If there is something on the syllabus that's not in the manual, you can just refer to a book to figure it out. I'm using past version of Actex and I actually don't even know if it did cover all cause I have multiple books.

Same goes for FM. FM has a much broader coverage, so I think even if you have the study manual, you'd want a secondary reference.
rere01
post Oct 13 2012, 05:38 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
26 posts

Joined: Oct 2012


i don't really understand actuarial science.
if i am to take it, what subjects am i required to have in A-levels and what bachelor degree should i get?
i am kinda interested in it but i don't feel like leaving science, is it possible for me to take engineering for bachelor and actuarial science for masters? would it be much of a difference? i just feel like being more versatile.
btw i am form 5, taking science stream+ accounts
LightningFist
post Oct 13 2012, 07:24 PM

Minion of the Damned
Group Icon
VIP
3,965 posts

Joined: Apr 2009
QUOTE(rere01 @ Oct 13 2012, 07:38 PM)
i don't really understand actuarial science.
if i am to take it, what subjects am i required to have in A-levels and what bachelor degree should i get?
i am kinda interested in it but i don't feel like leaving science, is it possible for me to take engineering for bachelor and actuarial science for masters? would it be much of a difference? i just feel like being more versatile.
btw i am form 5, taking science stream+ accounts
*
It's an interdisciplinary field. You're required to study Mathematics, Statistics, Economics, and Finance. Even a bit of Accounting. It's like there's overlap... you don't do everything a Maths or Economics student does.

Traditional applications are insurance (general, life, health), pensions, and investment. But qualified actuaries and those who have studied actuarial science sometimes venture beyond these fields into enterprise risk management, banking, statistics, and really any area where these skills may be used (casinos, airlines, energy suppliers) or where risk and statistics are involved. At the very least, they can work in Finance, but may have to explain their degree.

It's not uncommon for those in the field to possess a Master's degree (could be a requirement in Australia - and such degrees are available in the UK) but it's not always necessary. At the same time, there is no requirement for any degree, Bachelor's or Master's, in Actuarial Science unless you are qualifying in Australia (it's complicated, because they require some graduate education even if you're not awarded a Master's degree).

It's not unusual for Engineers to move into Actuarial Science, given their Mathematical ability. Economics and Finance can be difficult, but they are no match for Mathematics.

If in America, Malaysia, and the UK, you need to pass external exams (for which exemptions via a degree exist), so it doesn't depend on what degree you choose. It's good that you're interested in Engineering, and there's always Mathematics. Some people with Statistics or Economics degrees qualify, others may have more exotic ones.

That's a lot to take in and you haven't started your A Levels yet. You need Maths. For Engineering you want Physics and Chemistry, and Further Maths helps in both. The only required subject is Maths but the Engineering combo will boost any application.
rere01
post Oct 13 2012, 09:11 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
26 posts

Joined: Oct 2012


QUOTE(LightningFist @ Oct 13 2012, 07:24 PM)
It's an interdisciplinary field. You're required to study Mathematics, Statistics, Economics, and Finance. Even a bit of Accounting. It's like there's overlap... you don't do everything a Maths or Economics student does.

Traditional applications are insurance (general, life, health), pensions, and investment. But qualified actuaries and those who have studied actuarial science sometimes venture beyond these fields into enterprise risk management, banking, statistics, and really any area where these skills may be used (casinos, airlines, energy suppliers) or where risk and statistics are involved. At the very least, they can work in Finance, but may have to explain their degree.

It's not uncommon for those in the field to possess a Master's degree (could be a requirement in Australia - and such degrees are available in the UK) but it's not always necessary. At the same time, there is no requirement for any degree, Bachelor's or Master's, in Actuarial Science unless you are qualifying in Australia (it's complicated, because they require some graduate education even if you're not awarded a Master's degree).

It's not unusual for Engineers to move into Actuarial Science, given their Mathematical ability. Economics and Finance can be difficult, but they are no match for Mathematics.

If in America, Malaysia, and the UK, you need to pass external exams (for which exemptions via a degree exist), so it doesn't depend on what degree you choose. It's good that you're interested in Engineering, and there's always Mathematics. Some people with Statistics or Economics degrees qualify, others may have more exotic ones.

That's a lot to take in and you haven't started your A Levels yet. You need Maths. For Engineering you want Physics and Chemistry, and Further Maths helps in both. The only required subject is Maths but the Engineering combo will boost any application.
*
i am really quite good and interested in maths, accounts and physics, but kinda weak and uninterested in chemistry and biology, however i always manage to get an A for biology and chemistry too, kinda concerned about what should i further my studies in, thought of engineering or actuarial science.
However, i don't think i know really that much about them and am open to any suggestions about what other paths can i take, i feel like engineering is the only thing everyone i know that is into physics takes, what suggestions do u have for me?
LightningFist
post Oct 13 2012, 09:54 PM

Minion of the Damned
Group Icon
VIP
3,965 posts

Joined: Apr 2009
QUOTE(rere01 @ Oct 13 2012, 11:11 PM)
i am really quite good and interested in maths, accounts and physics, but kinda weak and uninterested in chemistry and biology, however i always manage to get an A for biology and chemistry too, kinda concerned about what should i further my studies in, thought of engineering or actuarial science.
However, i don't think i know really that much about them and am open to any suggestions about what other paths can i take, i feel like engineering is the only thing everyone i know that is into physics takes, what suggestions do u have for me?
*
Well, whatever you're studying at high school, it's gonna be different from the end of high school/6th Form/A Level. Whatever you study then is gonna be different from uni. Of course there'll be similarities, some of the foundational knowledge. But as a whole you won't know if you'll like it at uni.

Accounting can be really boring. If I asked you to open up a university level Maths, Statistics, Accounting, Economics, or Finance textbook, you might turn away in disgust. Very hard to tell.

You need to go far. Maths is very theoretical. Nevermind applications. You'll go through a lot of crap before you see Applied Mathematics. Engineering is less theoretical than Physics. You don't like Biology or Chemistry so health sciences, life sciences, or chemistry won't do.

If you really like systems, logic, then maybe Engineering or Computer Science type subjects will interest you. Do a bit of googling. Statistics can be quite boring too. In Maths you'll not have time to be bored as you'll be working your ass off.


rere01
post Oct 13 2012, 10:03 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
26 posts

Joined: Oct 2012


QUOTE(LightningFist @ Oct 13 2012, 09:54 PM)
Well, whatever you're studying at high school, it's gonna be different from the end of high school/6th Form/A Level. Whatever you study then is gonna be different from uni. Of course there'll be similarities, some of the foundational knowledge. But as a whole you won't know if you'll like it at uni.

Accounting can be really boring. If I asked you to open up a university level Maths, Statistics, Accounting, Economics, or Finance textbook, you might turn away in disgust. Very hard to tell.

You need to go far. Maths is very theoretical. Nevermind applications. You'll go through a lot of crap before you see Applied Mathematics. Engineering is less theoretical than Physics. You don't like Biology or Chemistry so health sciences, life sciences, or chemistry won't do.

If you really like systems, logic, then maybe Engineering or Computer Science type subjects will interest you. Do a bit of googling. Statistics can be quite boring too. In Maths you'll not have time to be bored as you'll be working your ass off.
*
so what good degrees are there for me if i am not into biology stuffs
LightningFist
post Oct 13 2012, 11:37 PM

Minion of the Damned
Group Icon
VIP
3,965 posts

Joined: Apr 2009
QUOTE(rere01 @ Oct 14 2012, 12:03 AM)
so what good degrees are there for me if i am not into biology stuffs
*
Do you like construction? Building stuff? Cars? Machines? Computers?

Data systems? Excel?

Clearly you don't like labs, chemicals, microscopes, cells and that sort of stuff.

You said so yourself, Engineering. Physics or subfields like Astrophysics are less practical but you can explore them.

We are discussing Actuarial Science and it's pretty much an office-type profession but you can get into interesting things like project finance, funds management, hedge funds, like I said airlines, casinos, if you're lucky.
rere01
post Oct 14 2012, 12:02 AM

New Member
*
Junior Member
26 posts

Joined: Oct 2012


QUOTE(LightningFist @ Oct 13 2012, 11:37 PM)
Do you like construction? Building stuff? Cars? Machines? Computers?

Data systems? Excel?

Clearly you don't like labs, chemicals, microscopes, cells and that sort of stuff.

You said so yourself, Engineering. Physics or subfields like Astrophysics are less practical but you can explore them.

We are discussing Actuarial Science and it's pretty much an office-type profession but you can get into interesting things like project finance, funds management, hedge funds, like I said airlines, casinos, if you're lucky.
*
well, engineeringwise, mechatronics and genetic engineering caught my attention, but i need to make a living too as we see
things we do in actuarial science is also very interesting to me but studying and sitting for exams for years is really a major turn-off
LightningFist
post Oct 14 2012, 02:38 AM

Minion of the Damned
Group Icon
VIP
3,965 posts

Joined: Apr 2009
QUOTE(rere01 @ Oct 14 2012, 02:02 AM)
well, engineeringwise, mechatronics and genetic engineering caught my attention, but i need to make a living too as we see
things we do in actuarial science is also very interesting to me but studying and sitting for exams for years is really a major turn-off
*
If you like Financial Modelling then you don't necessarily have to do Actuarial. If you're good at Maths, go ahead and study Maths, and eventually Mathematical Finance, Mathematical Modelling or Computational Science, or Computational Finance/Quantitative Finance/Financial Engineering. Since a lot of those are graduate level study.

Or you could start with Engineering. Because you need to be really smart, otherwise you need a qualification in Maths or Engineering to do FinEng/QuantFin later on.

There are also some MSc degrees, in case you prefer not to have full-on quant, since not all of these are.

It won't be exams for years, but you will have studied more, longer (and much harder stuff) than those 3 year Accounting or Finance people.

This is going to be more interesting than just modelling pensions or probabilities of accidents and lifespans. You can go into equities, equity derivatives, energy derivatives, currencies, precious metals, rates (fixed income), all manner of exotic and structured products. Very technical shit.


Added on October 14, 2012, 2:41 amSome people do a Physics PhD and go on to a MS FinEng after! Which is bizarre since they are/should be already so good at Maths and they are a Doctor of Philosophy in Physics of all things. There are also those who start out with Actuarial, but eventually go and study a MS FinEng after many years, and get CFA and everything.

This post has been edited by LightningFist: Oct 14 2012, 02:41 AM
rere01
post Oct 14 2012, 08:41 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
26 posts

Joined: Oct 2012


QUOTE(LightningFist @ Oct 14 2012, 02:38 AM)
If you like Financial Modelling then you don't necessarily have to do Actuarial. If you're good at Maths, go ahead and study Maths, and eventually Mathematical Finance, Mathematical Modelling or Computational Science, or Computational Finance/Quantitative Finance/Financial Engineering. Since a lot of those are graduate level study.

Or you could start with Engineering. Because you need to be really smart, otherwise you need a qualification in Maths or Engineering to do FinEng/QuantFin later on.

There are also some MSc degrees, in case you prefer not to have full-on quant, since not all of these are.

It won't be exams for years, but you will have studied more, longer (and much harder stuff) than those 3 year Accounting or Finance people.

This is going to be more interesting than just modelling pensions or probabilities of accidents and lifespans. You can go into equities, equity derivatives, energy derivatives, currencies, precious metals, rates (fixed income), all manner of exotic and structured products. Very technical shit.


Added on October 14, 2012, 2:41 amSome people do a Physics PhD and go on to a MS FinEng after! Which is bizarre since they are/should be already so good at Maths and they are a Doctor of Philosophy in Physics of all things. There are also those who start out with Actuarial, but eventually go and study a MS FinEng after many years, and get CFA and everything.
*
well most of those courses u mentioned are really nothing i knew much, and i certainly dont wanna study something that would get me much trouble in getting a well paid job in the future...and by any chance being an entrepreneur too, hehe
Searingmage
post Oct 14 2012, 11:52 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,809 posts

Joined: Feb 2010


QUOTE(rere01 @ Oct 14 2012, 08:41 PM)
well most of those courses u mentioned are really nothing i knew much, and i certainly dont wanna study something that would get me much trouble in getting a well paid job in the future...and by any chance being an entrepreneur too, hehe
*
A hard cold truth for you, it's very difficult to enter the actuarial industry these days.
So, if you think studying Actuarial Science will guarantee you a well paid job, you are gravely mistaken. Even if you managed to enter the Actuarial industry, the pay is slightly above average at best, unless you pass papers very quickly.
H2O3
post Oct 15 2012, 12:12 AM

New Member
*
Junior Member
48 posts

Joined: Jul 2010
i really dont understand why so much ppl thk actuary can earn big money whereas there are alot jobs outside offer better pay such as dealer/ trader, analyst, project manager etc...
LightningFist
post Oct 15 2012, 11:39 AM

Minion of the Damned
Group Icon
VIP
3,965 posts

Joined: Apr 2009
QUOTE(H2O3 @ Oct 15 2012, 02:12 AM)
i really dont understand why so much ppl thk actuary can earn big money whereas there are alot jobs outside offer better pay such as dealer/ trader, analyst, project manager etc...
*
You're right, a bank does pay high salaries, at least big or successful banks do.

But there's also job security. And both careers/industries work differently.

How many analysts and traders were laid off during the financial crisis? Or the recessionary periods that followed?

An insurance company employs actuaries, but not a huge number of them. And a small number of those are the 'heads' or 'chiefs'. They probably have to compete with less people to move up to CRO, CFO, CEO or COO.

A bank's structure is larger, it had many VPs and Heads, with people holding and working different positions at the same time. But these employees compete with more for top positions.

A successful trader's salary is obviously going to beat an actuary's, when even analysts lose to them. But I think nowadays it's more difficult to get an analyst, trader, or sales job at a good, big bank. So many of them have graduate Financial Engineering degrees, and/or MBAs and CFAs. Probably less time than it takes to get Fellow status as an actuary, but still a considerable amount of work.

Also maybe at the higher level, an actuary doesn't need to work as long as a banker. If you care about per hour pay.
rere01
post Oct 15 2012, 06:36 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
26 posts

Joined: Oct 2012


QUOTE(Searingmage @ Oct 14 2012, 11:52 PM)
A hard cold truth for you, it's very difficult to enter the actuarial industry these days.
So, if you think studying Actuarial Science will guarantee you a well paid job, you are gravely mistaken. Even if you managed to enter the Actuarial industry, the pay is slightly above average at best, unless you pass papers very quickly.
*
then what jobS offers high pay? and what degrees are required for it?
LightningFist
post Oct 15 2012, 10:45 PM

Minion of the Damned
Group Icon
VIP
3,965 posts

Joined: Apr 2009
QUOTE(rere01 @ Oct 15 2012, 08:36 PM)
then what jobS offers high pay? and what degrees are required for it?
*
High risk, high volatility industries or jobs.

Oil and gas. Trading/brokerage. Diving.

Being a pilot pays I think more for the qualification and skill more than the risk, since risk is generally low. Also the industry has become more stable over time, but profits are still affected by fuel prices.
Searingmage
post Oct 20 2012, 11:56 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,809 posts

Joined: Feb 2010


QUOTE(rere01 @ Oct 15 2012, 06:36 PM)
then what jobS offers high pay? and what degrees are required for it?
*
As the saying goes, high risk = high return.
Hence, take maximum risk by playing derivatives using high leverage, then you may have a chance to earn big in a very short period of time.
However, it's also an easy way to go bankrupt whistling.gif

Anyways, to answer your question regarding "job(s)" that offer high pay, what is your definition of high pay?
Starting salary, or ending salary?
If you thinking about being rich, being an entrepreneur would give you a high chance.
mumeichan
post Nov 22 2012, 05:47 AM

Member
*******
Senior Member
4,152 posts

Joined: May 2005
QUOTE(rere01 @ Oct 15 2012, 06:36 PM)
then what jobS offers high pay? and what degrees are required for it?
*
No jobs pay a lot and what degree you have doesn't matter.
LightningFist
post Dec 22 2012, 06:10 PM

Minion of the Damned
Group Icon
VIP
3,965 posts

Joined: Apr 2009
Anyone can comment on SOA vs UK/Australian qualifications, in terms of the difficulty of the exams/of qualifying?

I noticed a lot of actuaries are SOA-qualified, even those that went to Australian and British schools which provide for IoA/FoA/IoAA exemptions, and many students are doing the SOA series too.

I know UK/Australian preliminary exams when passed can be converted to SOA exam exemptions, and vice versa.

Also, can anyone comment on the different specialisations? What are the implications/consequences of the choice of specialisation - does it restrict job opportunities for qualified actuaries?

For example for STs Health/Care and Life go together, or Pensions with either, the two General subjects go together (but there is only one SA for General), there are two distinct Finance/Investment subjects (but two similar SAs), and ERM (no SA).
Searingmage
post Dec 23 2012, 10:49 AM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,809 posts

Joined: Feb 2010


QUOTE(LightningFist @ Dec 22 2012, 06:10 PM)
Anyone can comment on SOA vs UK/Australian qualifications, in terms of the difficulty of the exams/of qualifying?

I noticed a lot of actuaries are SOA-qualified, even those that went to Australian and British schools which provide for IoA/FoA/IoAA exemptions, and many students are doing the SOA series too.

I know UK/Australian preliminary exams when passed can be converted to SOA exam exemptions, and vice versa.

Also, can anyone comment on the different specialisations? What are the implications/consequences of the choice of specialisation - does it restrict job opportunities for qualified actuaries?

For example for STs Health/Care and Life go together, or Pensions with either, the two General subjects go together (but there is only one SA for General), there are two distinct Finance/Investment subjects (but two similar SAs), and ERM (no SA).
*
The reason why most actuary in Malaysia are SOA-qualified is because it's the most convenient for Malaysians.
For Australia qualification, you'll need to take the exams in Australia as they do not offer them elsewhere.
SoA also have the exams more frequent as compared to other institute. Though, UK is slowly catching up. As most people are in SoA, therefore, it's easier to get advice, materials etc too. Hence, many people convert to SoA.

P/S: Btw, Australia's exam is very very expensive. Cost about RM15k for the final paper... <-- may be one of the reason why people are not keen to take up IOAA.
LightningFist
post Dec 23 2012, 12:29 PM

Minion of the Damned
Group Icon
VIP
3,965 posts

Joined: Apr 2009
QUOTE(Searingmage @ Dec 23 2012, 10:49 AM)
The reason why most actuary in Malaysia are SOA-qualified is because it's the most convenient for Malaysians.
For Australia qualification, you'll need to take the exams in Australia as they do not offer them elsewhere.
SoA also have the exams more frequent as compared to other institute. Though, UK is slowly catching up. As most people are in SoA, therefore, it's easier to get advice, materials etc too. Hence, many people convert to SoA.

P/S: Btw, Australia's exam is very very expensive. Cost about RM15k for the final paper... <-- may be one of the reason why people are not keen to take up IOAA.
*
Yeah, I was wondering about access and logistics too. Several thousand AUD for each of the four final part Australian exams. And each is scheduled to be 15 weeks long. Though they claim to have exam offices/centres in KL, Singapore, Hong Kong too. Anyway any face-to-face is probably in Sydney, if it isn't the web based stuff.

I'm aware the closest place for the UK one is Singapore's SMU. Which is fairly close I suppose, given the exams aren't taken so frequently, just twice a year at most.

Wasn't aware that Australia's was comparably more expensive, or that SOA had more frequent exams.

Thanks for enlightening me. Could I ask some straightforward questions:

1. How frequently can you take SOA exams, and how many times are you allowed to repeat for fails (and what happens - consequences - if you do)?

2. Do you mind telling me where you are working (type of firm and country) and where you plan to work after qualifying?



Searingmage
post Dec 23 2012, 01:04 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,809 posts

Joined: Feb 2010


QUOTE(LightningFist @ Dec 23 2012, 12:29 PM)
Yeah, I was wondering about access and logistics too. Several thousand AUD for each of the four final part Australian exams. And each is scheduled to be 15 weeks long. Though they claim to have exam offices/centres in KL, Singapore, Hong Kong too. Anyway any face-to-face is probably in Sydney, if it isn't the web based stuff.

I'm aware the closest place for the UK one is Singapore's SMU. Which is fairly close I suppose, given the exams aren't taken so frequently, just twice a year at most.

Wasn't aware that Australia's was comparably more expensive, or that SOA had more frequent exams.

Thanks for enlightening me. Could I ask some straightforward questions:

1. How frequently can you take SOA exams, and how many times are you allowed to repeat for fails (and what happens - consequences - if you do)?

2. Do you mind telling me where you are working (type of firm and country) and where you plan to work after qualifying?
*
1. Depends on which paper. But at least twice per year. First few exams up to 4-5 times a year.. For modules, at any point of time. I'm not aware of any consequences for failing. You should be able to repeat as many times as you want. I believe it's the same for other institute as well.

As for your 2nd question, pls do pm me for more personal questions as I'm not too comfortable sharing them in public.

SUSdoublezul
post Dec 24 2012, 01:16 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
175 posts

Joined: May 2009



i want to get degree in Acturial Science at Universiti of Malaya

is it ok ? what are the pros and cons ?

can someone help me with this
zstan
post Dec 24 2012, 01:24 PM

10k Club
********
All Stars
15,856 posts

Joined: Nov 2007
From: Zion



QUOTE(LightningFist @ Dec 23 2012, 12:29 PM)
1. How frequently can you take SOA exams, and how many times are you allowed to repeat for fails (and what happens - consequences - if you do)?

2. Do you mind telling me where you are working (type of firm and country) and where you plan to work after qualifying?
*
for number 1, if you are paying the papers for yourself then you should be able to resit as many times as you want, however if your company is sponsoring you then its another story altogether.
mumeichan
post Dec 24 2012, 03:34 PM

Member
*******
Senior Member
4,152 posts

Joined: May 2005
QUOTE(doublezul @ Dec 24 2012, 01:16 PM)
i want to get degree in Acturial Science at Universiti of Malaya

is it ok ? what are the pros and cons ?

can someone help me with this
*
I don't actually think there is much use is an actuarial degree.
Searingmage
post Dec 24 2012, 08:20 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,809 posts

Joined: Feb 2010


QUOTE(doublezul @ Dec 24 2012, 01:16 PM)
i want to get degree in Acturial Science at Universiti of Malaya

is it ok ? what are the pros and cons ?

can someone help me with this
*
IINM, it's quite difficult to enter AS in local uni.. (you hv to get CGPA 4.0 for matrix/STPM to enter).
However, if public university is your choice, I would suggest UKM before UM (because UM is 4 years course, UKM is 3 years).
SUSdoublezul
post Dec 24 2012, 08:34 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
175 posts

Joined: May 2009



QUOTE(Searingmage @ Dec 24 2012, 08:20 PM)
IINM, it's quite difficult to enter AS in local uni.. (you hv to get CGPA 4.0 for matrix/STPM to enter).
However, if public university is your choice, I would suggest UKM before UM (because UM is 4 years course, UKM is 3 years).
*
hmm cannot do foundation in UM or UKM then pursue AS degree there ?
Searingmage
post Dec 24 2012, 09:32 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,809 posts

Joined: Feb 2010


QUOTE(doublezul @ Dec 24 2012, 08:34 PM)
hmm cannot do foundation in UM or UKM then pursue AS degree there ?
*
Public university do not offer such option AFAIK.


Added on December 24, 2012, 9:33 pm
QUOTE(mumeichan @ Dec 24 2012, 03:34 PM)
I don't actually think there is much use is an actuarial degree.
*
I would have to disagree with you on this as my degree has helped me a lot.
What I learnt in uni taught me the theory and principle, what work taught me is how to apply them. I believe it would be significantly more difficult for me to adapt work had I not have an actuarial degree.

This post has been edited by Searingmage: Dec 24 2012, 09:33 PM
adewhite
post Jan 3 2013, 02:44 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
96 posts

Joined: Jan 2006
From: Kuala Lumpur


QUOTE(LightningFist @ Jun 10 2012, 07:32 PM)
Quite right. To be an actuary the paper qualifications and experience components are very important, more than the "top school" factor that other fields (banking, finance, consulting, law) sometimes select for in addition to excellent results.

In fact, you'll notice many top schools don't even teach Actuarial Science! In Britain I can think of LSE and Warwick University, but they don't even have (for now) full exemptions! The major ones are City University (Cass Business School) and Kent. Although, if you did Mathematics at Cambridge University you might have as much of a shot for en entry level role as someone who did an Actuarial undergrad. So long as you show the willingness and potential to do exams. It's not about the degree - Accounting or Finance backgrounds are common too. In the US you can go to Wharton but it's not a straight Actuarial degree. Plus no major exemptions in the US anyway. NUS only has a joint Actuarial degree. Australia has quite a few.
*
Did a research recently and found only few Universities in the UK has 8 out of 9 papers exempted (Core Technical) and they are Heriot-Watt University (BSc in Actuarial Science), Queen's University Belfast (BSc in Actuarial Science and Risk Management), Cass Business School (City Uni) - BSc in Actuarial Science, University of Kent (BSc in Actuarial Science), University of Southampton (BSc in Mathematics with Actuarial Science and BSc Social Sciences in Economics and Actuarial Science).
In fact LSE - BSc in Actuarial Science only offers 7 out of 9 papers exempted and Warwick University, you need to complete their Master programme in order to get 7 out of 9 papers exempted.

So, student must choose carefully especially the courses and Universities in the UK when it comes to Actuarial studies.
LightningFist
post Jan 3 2013, 08:13 PM

Minion of the Damned
Group Icon
VIP
3,965 posts

Joined: Apr 2009
QUOTE(adewhite @ Jan 3 2013, 02:44 PM)
Did a research recently and found only few Universities in the UK has 8 out of 9 papers exempted (Core Technical) and they are Heriot-Watt University (BSc in Actuarial Science), Queen's University Belfast (BSc in Actuarial Science and Risk Management), Cass Business School (City Uni) - BSc in Actuarial Science, University of Kent (BSc in Actuarial Science), University of Southampton (BSc in Mathematics with Actuarial Science and BSc Social Sciences in Economics and Actuarial Science).
In fact LSE - BSc in Actuarial Science only offers 7 out of 9 papers exempted and Warwick University, you need to complete their Master programme in order to get 7 out of 9 papers exempted.

So, student must choose carefully especially the courses and Universities in the UK when it comes to Actuarial studies.
*
FYI CT9 is not the same type of written exam as the first 8. The crucial thing is CA1. That I think can only be found at Irish schools (undergrad), or graduate (or AU Honours) Actuarial degrees. But it is a lot of money.

Not unusual that it is that way at Warwick University since they merely have an Actuarial concentration. Not a straight Actuarial degree.

The strange thing is the schools (teaching Act Sci) without quite as many CT exemptions. Because why do an Actuarial degree (which not many people understand) if not to focus heavily on Actuarial material...

There's is also the implication of exemptions... they replace exams and help lead to qualification, but they are no substitute for work experience and practical skills... so a fresh grad with half the exams done isn't necessarily better off even in the Actuarial field vs a fresh grad without many exam passes but who steadily completes them. Maybe because firms think these fresh grads expect more pay with exemptions (because normally exam passes increases pay) and prefer to hire others.
SUSdoublezul
post Jan 3 2013, 10:27 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
175 posts

Joined: May 2009



in UiTM how many papers were exempted ?
H2O3
post Jan 3 2013, 11:03 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
48 posts

Joined: Jul 2010
QUOTE(LightningFist @ Dec 23 2012, 12:29 PM)
Yeah, I was wondering about access and logistics too. Several thousand AUD for each of the four final part Australian exams. And each is scheduled to be 15 weeks long. Though they claim to have exam offices/centres in KL, Singapore, Hong Kong too. Anyway any face-to-face is probably in Sydney, if it isn't the web based stuff.

I'm aware the closest place for the UK one is Singapore's SMU. Which is fairly close I suppose, given the exams aren't taken so frequently, just twice a year at most.

Wasn't aware that Australia's was comparably more expensive, or that SOA had more frequent exams.

Thanks for enlightening me. Could I ask some straightforward questions:

1. How frequently can you take SOA exams, and how many times are you allowed to repeat for fails (and what happens - consequences - if you do)?

2. Do you mind telling me where you are working (type of firm and country) and where you plan to work after qualifying?
*
for ques 1, you can take soa exams many times until u pass it. for those under student discount program, if u fail more than 3 times, the fourth time you will need to pay full amount.

QUOTE(doublezul @ Jan 3 2013, 10:27 PM)
in UiTM how many papers were exempted ?
*
i dont think any malaysia uni have exam exemption, expect vee

This post has been edited by H2O3: Jan 3 2013, 11:04 PM
LightningFist
post Jan 3 2013, 11:04 PM

Minion of the Damned
Group Icon
VIP
3,965 posts

Joined: Apr 2009
No Malaysian school gets any direct CT exemptions.

The maximum allowable exemptions for any school are the 3 SOA/CAS VEEs, which correspond to CT2 and CT7 and part of CT6.


conankun
post Feb 10 2013, 03:26 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
88 posts

Joined: Dec 2012


free bump
cnvery
post Feb 10 2013, 03:21 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,831 posts

Joined: Dec 2009

Now private uni only got UTAR, Sunway Uni, UCSI offer Actuarial Science Degree.
almudjem
post Feb 20 2013, 05:46 PM

New Member
*
Newbie
1 posts

Joined: Feb 2013
QUOTE(monkeyseemonkeydo @ May 23 2009, 07:04 AM)
I believe that people are doing Actuarial Science for the wrong reasons. I hope that this post will actually shatter the disillusionment that people have. Don’t get me wrong, I am not trying to discourage people to pursue this challenging course, its challenge being its ultimate reward. However, it is disheartening to see so many people get into this course and ending up not being qualified actuaries, because they fail to understand what this course is all about.
First and foremost, my qualifications: I have wanted to do Actuarial Science since I was in Form 4. In college, I did my research and I have looked at the qualifications provided in the UK, US, Australia and Malaysia. I have now finished my final year in Actuarial Science in the UK. I have interned in an insurance company in Malaysia as well as in my current location. And I have been in your shoes before.

To get the ball rolling, here are some misconceptions that need to be cleared up:

1. I want to do Actuarial Science because I like Math.
This is the biggest misconception that people have about Actuarial Science. In actual fact, a good knowledge of Mathematics is necessary, but a great knowledge is not. In the UK, the first 8 professional papers are somewhat Maths-based, but the tougher papers at the end are all written papers, which require a good command of English, a good knowledge of the insurance industry and good critical thinking skills. Throughout my course, the most difficult branch of Maths we did was Calculus and Linear Algebra, and that is not saying much. When you do start working, you will realise that the only Math you need are mostly addition and subtraction. Computer Programming will be the most important skill you will ever need. And to all of those who says that they need Further Math in their A-Levels, I did Math, Economics and Law. If you like Math, do a Mathematics degree.

2. I want to do Actuarial Science because the pay is good.
True, we have one of the highest starting salaries in the business world. Not by much though. The thing is, a qualified actuary does earn a lot. But to get that qualification, one has to pass professional papers, and those are not easy by a mile. The average time it takes to pass all your papers in Malaysia is around 6 years, depending on how good you are. (Some do take more than 10 years) And truth be told, all other professions will be able to earn a satisfactory remuneration within 10 years. If you want the money, go into Investment Banking. In a magazine which I have read, in business, while all other financial workers are paying off their mortgage for their first house, Investment Bankers are buying their second home.

3. I can pass all my professional exams if I work hard enough.
I want to believe this. I really do want to believe this. But with only 50 qualified actuaries in Malaysia, doesn’t it make you doubt that the only reason people are failing is because of a lack of effort? Studying is easy enough. Working is easy enough. Studying while working is not. While I was working in Malaysia, a colleague of mine works from 9 to 7 everyday, if he is lucky. On his way to and back from work, he studies on the LRT. If there is overtime, he will need to stay back and continue working. On weekends, he studies. At night, after being thoroughly exhausted at work, he studies. And while doing all these, he needs to find time for his girlfriend, family and friends. Now, ask yourself this: can you picture yourself doing that for a year? 3 years? 10 years?

I am really glad I chose this course. I know I would spend half my time working staring in a computer at spreadsheets. I know it will be a hard few years in front of me. I also know that I want nothing more than to qualify as a professional actuary, as I do love what I do very much. But I wished I knew what I was in for before I made the decision. And I do hope that people who read this will have the ability to make an informed decision about the course that is Actuarial Science.
*
rclxms.gif
i have read through and what you are saying makes much sense but now which some help from you.really interest in being an actuary and i am more convinced now.have my bachelor degree in curriculum studies/mathematics. given that i that i did not do all the progam of mathematics degree what should be my next step in moving towards being an actuary.


This post has been edited by almudjem: Feb 20 2013, 05:51 PM
Ariea
post Feb 25 2013, 10:59 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
7 posts

Joined: Feb 2013


Hi... I'm glad I came across your forum, it's very informative =) I'll be signing up for an Actuarial Studies undergrad course soon (I hope I'll like it XD)... any other tips for a newcomer to the world of Actuarial Science and uni life in general?
jerryhao
post Feb 26 2013, 11:13 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
242 posts

Joined: Jan 2013


QUOTE(Ariea @ Feb 25 2013, 10:59 PM)
Hi... I'm glad I came across your forum, it's very informative =) I'll be signing up for an Actuarial Studies undergrad course soon (I hope I'll like it XD)... any other tips for a newcomer to the world of Actuarial Science and uni life in general?
*
where do you study Actuarial Science?
Ariea
post Mar 8 2013, 09:54 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
7 posts

Joined: Feb 2013


QUOTE(jerryhao @ Feb 26 2013, 11:13 PM)
where do you study Actuarial Science?
*
Sunway Uni... I'll be starting at the end of this month =)
jerryhao
post Mar 10 2013, 04:29 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
242 posts

Joined: Jan 2013


QUOTE(Ariea @ Mar 8 2013, 09:54 PM)
Sunway Uni... I'll be starting at the end of this month =)
*
ohoh
i still consider between sunway and UTAR

SUSdoublezul
post Mar 10 2013, 09:09 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
175 posts

Joined: May 2009



bump
Ariea
post Mar 10 2013, 10:30 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
7 posts

Joined: Feb 2013


QUOTE(jerryhao @ Mar 10 2013, 04:29 PM)
ohoh
i still consider between sunway and UTAR
*
I see~ Well in any case, good luck =)

Btw, are actuarial science courses generally heavy on assignments/projects? Or are they more exam based? Also, what kind of software will I be using (aside from excel)? I am asking because I'm looking to get a new laptop and I want to get one that meets the requirements for my course...
RyukA
post Mar 11 2013, 01:30 AM

On my way
****
Senior Member
612 posts

Joined: Jan 2010


QUOTE(Ariea @ Mar 10 2013, 10:30 PM)
I see~ Well in any case, good luck =)

Btw, are actuarial science courses generally heavy on assignments/projects? Or are they more exam based? Also, what kind of software will I be using (aside from excel)? I am asking because I'm looking to get a new laptop and I want to get one that meets the requirements for my course...
*
depends on your lecturer.
There is no prescribed standard.
but most content in an actuarial program will likely have assessments that are heavily exam-weighted.
jerryhao
post Mar 11 2013, 02:09 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
242 posts

Joined: Jan 2013


QUOTE(Ariea @ Mar 10 2013, 10:30 PM)
I see~ Well in any case, good luck =)

Btw, are actuarial science courses generally heavy on assignments/projects? Or are they more exam based? Also, what kind of software will I be using (aside from excel)? I am asking because I'm looking to get a new laptop and I want to get one that meets the requirements for my course...
*
i also not sure about the software
but i know the AS is exam based just like ACCA
Ariea
post Mar 11 2013, 05:11 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
7 posts

Joined: Feb 2013


QUOTE(jerryhao @ Mar 11 2013, 02:09 AM)
i also not sure about the software
but i know the AS is exam based just like ACCA
*
Thanks =)
Searingmage
post Mar 14 2013, 08:32 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,809 posts

Joined: Feb 2010


QUOTE(Ariea @ Mar 10 2013, 10:30 PM)
I see~ Well in any case, good luck =)

Btw, are actuarial science courses generally heavy on assignments/projects? Or are they more exam based? Also, what kind of software will I be using (aside from excel)? I am asking because I'm looking to get a new laptop and I want to get one that meets the requirements for my course...
*
Local or overseas?
But I believe it will be exam-based nevertheless.
For studying, actuarial students don't use much programs. For work though, usually 2 key programs are used - Prophet/Axis and Excel.
Local uni tends to provide programming class such as C, VBA as well, which is useful for work.
steven1107
post Mar 14 2013, 09:25 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
196 posts

Joined: Jun 2012
Do u guys heard the FRM (financial risk manager) professional certificate?
How was the prospect when getting this qualification.
I'm plan to make a changes in my career.
Searingmage
post Mar 14 2013, 09:30 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,809 posts

Joined: Feb 2010


QUOTE(steven1107 @ Mar 14 2013, 09:25 PM)
Do u guys heard the FRM (financial risk manager) professional certificate?
How was the prospect when getting this qualification.
I'm plan to make a changes in my career.
*
Are you talking bout CERA, ERM, or other financial risk management courses?
If it's CERA you're talking about, better off taking ERM. Anyways, Actuarial's value in Malaysia is only in the insurance industry.. But it doesn't really matter which track you take as long as you are a qualified actuary.
If you're talking bout other FRM, then here's a wrong place to ask.
steven1107
post Mar 14 2013, 09:36 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
196 posts

Joined: Jun 2012
Yes. I'm talking about the financial risk management course. I'm plan to take the professional course. How would u rating the FRM!
Searingmage
post Mar 14 2013, 09:37 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,809 posts

Joined: Feb 2010


QUOTE(steven1107 @ Mar 14 2013, 09:36 PM)
Yes. I'm talking about the financial risk management course. I'm plan to take the professional course. How would u rating the FRM!
*
Here's soley Actuarial Science discussion thread.. I don't think it's a right place to ask.
But in my opinion, risk management course is a good course with a lot of potentials.
Y-shapedTwig
post May 25 2013, 02:47 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
50 posts

Joined: Sep 2011
Advice for quants wanna be
written by Mark Joshi (Professor at Centre of Actuarial Studies, the University of Melbourne)

http://www.markjoshi.com/downloads/advice.pdf

This post has been edited by Y-shapedTwig: May 25 2013, 02:59 PM
bloodchow2
post May 25 2013, 04:25 PM

On my way
****
Senior Member
664 posts

Joined: Mar 2013
thanks alot, now i need engineering 1
YennVIP
post Jun 29 2013, 02:52 AM

New Member
*
Junior Member
6 posts

Joined: Jun 2013
1. Is it hard to take double degrees with actuarial science? I have a strong interest in Maths but Mathematics degree can't take me any further right? i might end up being a lecturer or researcher.

2. I pretty much have interest in probabilities and investment. I've decided to take AS degree but i don't plan to become an actuary, will it be a waste? Is an Actuarial Science degree more valuable than other degrees since we can switch to other fields such as investment and risk management? Is it possible to become a financial consultancy with an AS degree?

3. What field can i enter if i'm an AS degree holder other than risk management and insurance? Can i enter marketing and business field?

4. In Actuarial Science degree, u need to have a stronger Maths or Econs? Like which is more preferable, i don't want the answer 'They must be equally good'.

Please answer my questions>< thanks!
Crazy.SoT.Gila
post Jun 29 2013, 09:18 AM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,704 posts

Joined: Sep 2005
From: Oil Town


QUOTE(YennVIP @ Jun 28 2013, 02:52 PM)
1. Is it hard to take double degrees with actuarial science? I have a strong interest in Maths but Mathematics degree can't take me any further right? i might end up being a lecturer or researcher.
Wrong. There are many options coming out from a math degree. I suggest you look into different universities web site and see what math programs they offer, along with past alumni's career path

2. I pretty much have interest in probabilities and investment. I've decided to take AS degree but i don't plan to become an actuary, will it be a waste? Is an Actuarial Science degree more valuable than other degrees since we can switch to other fields such as investment and risk management? Is it possible to become a financial consultancy with an AS degree?
It is still possible, yes. It really depends how you apply yourself. Examples are sitting for CFA, intern in IB, etc. But if you don't plan to go down the actuarial path, please reconsider your decision. There are plenty of other programs out there.

3. What field can i enter if i'm an AS degree holder other than risk management and insurance? Can i enter marketing and business field?
Same answer as above really. It depends how you apply yourself. There are companies out there like Shell who hire people from all sorts of degrees -- but then apply them differently. Is it the best/easiest path to those ends? Maybe not. Also look into HR -- workforce management is a thing nowadays and they like people with some actuarial background.

4. In Actuarial Science degree, u need to have a stronger Maths or Econs? Like which is more preferable, i don't want the answer 'They must be equally good'.
Math.

Please answer my questions>< thanks!
*

YennVIP
post Jun 30 2013, 10:59 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
6 posts

Joined: Jun 2013
[quote=Crazy.SoT.Gila,Jun 29 2013, 09:18 AM]
*


Most of the people i know who took Mathematics degree ended up being a lecturer. Even if they ended up in finance field, isn't it more worth it to just take Financial Mathematics degree? AS degree even covers part of Financial Mathematics and basic of accountancy, which is better than Mathematics degree (just dealing with numbers). So Mathematics degree is not that valuable imo even though i love maths blink.gif

I want to take AS degree but didn't plan to become an actuary because AS degree covers a lil' bit of other fields such as finance, accountancy, investment management etc. It's good to understand part of the things that are in other courses and i can see which field i'm really interested in. So if i don't plan to become an actuary i still can learn a wide variety of things in AS degree that might help in my future career right?

I'm not really good in Econs but better in Maths and interested in Finance. If there's Maths, Statistics, Econs and Finance, how many percentage do they cover in an AS degree?

I'm currently studying A-levels and preparing to apply for 5 UK universities. How would u rate University of Warwick, City University, University of Kent, University of East Anglia and University of Southampton, from best to worst?

This post has been edited by YennVIP: Jun 30 2013, 11:02 PM
Crazy.SoT.Gila
post Jun 30 2013, 11:46 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,704 posts

Joined: Sep 2005
From: Oil Town


YennVIP

I am not familiar with UK universities. You might want to throw in Heriot-Watt into your list though.

There are a lot of programs under maths. It doesn't just have to be pure maths. I went to uWaterloo; you can see what they offer under the math faculty. Although I do understand that most universities lump it under BSc. You can also consider taking a minor to supplement yourself.

Again, yes it can help. But it may not be the best choice. Look at the UW list of programs there - you should be able to see other alternatives. And I am sure other universities have those similar programs.

I covered only Econs 101 and 102 for my degree (taken at INTI SJ). Statistics covers a majority of it, and I suppose followed by finance. But you will need the math background to work through those two areas.

This post has been edited by Crazy.SoT.Gila: Jun 30 2013, 11:46 PM
YennVIP
post Jul 1 2013, 06:37 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
6 posts

Joined: Jun 2013
QUOTE(Crazy.SoT.Gila @ Jun 30 2013, 11:46 PM)
YennVIP

I am not familiar with UK universities. You might want to throw in Heriot-Watt into your list though.

There are a lot of programs under maths. It doesn't just have to be pure maths. I went to uWaterloo; you can see what they offer under the math faculty. Although I do understand that most universities lump it under BSc. You can also consider taking a minor to supplement yourself.

Again, yes it can help. But it may not be the best choice. Look at the UW list of programs there - you should be able to see other alternatives. And I am sure other universities have those similar programs.

I covered only Econs 101 and 102 for my degree (taken at INTI SJ). Statistics covers a majority of it, and I suppose followed by finance. But you will need the math background to work through those two areas.
*
Yes, Heriot-Watt was in my list at first, but i threw it out of my list because of its location. Edinburgh is too far away from Cardiff where my brother is currently studying now and it would be inconvenient for my parents to come visit us, not to mention my sis will also be studying in UK soon.

Thanks for the information bout uWaterloo but i prefer to study in UK biggrin.gif
*Thanks for answering my questions Crazy.SoT.Gila smile.gif *

Anyone else have studied or currently studying AS degree in UK universities? Manchester University, University of Leceister, University of Southampton, which is the best? I need to set one of them as my 5th choice unsure.gif

This post has been edited by YennVIP: Jul 1 2013, 10:42 PM
studyboy
post Jul 1 2013, 10:49 PM

On my way
****
Senior Member
522 posts

Joined: Mar 2013
[quote=YennVIP,Jun 30 2013, 10:59 PM]
[quote=Crazy.SoT.Gila,Jun 29 2013, 09:18 AM]
*


Most of the people i know who took Mathematics degree ended up being a lecturer. Even if they ended up in finance field, isn't it more worth it to just take Financial Mathematics degree? AS degree even covers part of Financial Mathematics and basic of accountancy, which is better than Mathematics degree (just dealing with numbers). So Mathematics degree is not that valuable imo even though i love maths blink.gif

I want to take AS degree but didn't plan to become an actuary because AS degree covers a lil' bit of other fields such as finance, accountancy, investment management etc. It's good to understand part of the things that are in other courses and i can see which field i'm really interested in. So if i don't plan to become an actuary i still can learn a wide variety of things in AS degree that might help in my future career right?

I'm not really good in Econs but better in Maths and interested in Finance. If there's Maths, Statistics, Econs and Finance, how many percentage do they cover in an AS degree?

I'm currently studying A-levels and preparing to apply for 5 UK universities. How would u rate University of Warwick, City University, University of Kent, University of East Anglia and University of Southampton, from best to worst?
*

[/quote]

For your own sake, please do not study a degree in Mathematics. Mathematics at university is different from A levels altogether! Practice makes perfect no longer applies and Mathematical aptitude overulls. Take it from me YennVIP. I have studied Mathematics in the UK for 4 years and ended up almost jobless in Malaysia. Now, I am faced with another dilemma as I dislike finance which render my employment options more limited than ever.

I can't answer many of your questions but I could rate the universities (according to my personal view of course, not a widespread perception).

1) Warwick
2) City
3) Southampton
4) Kent
5) East Anglia

On a side note, a friend of mine is at UEA studying for her PhD in Applied Mathematics. smile.gif
Crazy.SoT.Gila
post Jul 2 2013, 11:33 AM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,704 posts

Joined: Sep 2005
From: Oil Town


QUOTE(YennVIP @ Jul 1 2013, 06:37 AM)
Thanks for the information bout uWaterloo but i prefer to study in UK biggrin.gif
*
Just asking you to view it as a reference on what programs are available out there. Not in any way asking you to go to Waterloo.
RyukA
post Jul 2 2013, 01:49 PM

On my way
****
Senior Member
612 posts

Joined: Jan 2010


QUOTE(YennVIP @ Jun 29 2013, 02:52 AM)
1. Is it hard to take double degrees with actuarial science? I have a strong interest in Maths but Mathematics degree can't take me any further right? i might end up being a lecturer or researcher.

2. I pretty much have interest in probabilities and investment. I've decided to take AS degree but i don't plan to become an actuary, will it be a waste? Is an Actuarial Science degree more valuable than other degrees since we can switch to other fields such as investment and risk management? Is it possible to become a financial consultancy with an AS degree?

3. What field can i enter if i'm an AS degree holder other than risk management and insurance? Can i enter marketing and business field?

4. In Actuarial Science degree, u need to have a stronger Maths or Econs? Like which is more preferable, i don't want the answer 'They must be equally good'.

Please answer my questions>< thanks!
*
I did a double degree in Actuarial & Commerce, where my commerce program covers Accounting and Finance.
Hard to do it with a double degree? Depends on which stage you are talking about;
1. For a Math/Actuarial combined degree, early stage would be a living hell having the need to crunch in abstract math and understand them at different context. But as you do a few intermediate courses in mathematical analysis and bit more theoretical stuff, it actually aids you for the Actuarial courses as you find concepts are relatively easier to pick up.

2. For a Finance/Actuarial type of combination, you wont really feel a very strong difference in early years except the fact that you probably need to do more statistics than the usual finance cohort. At the final stage, what you learn is probably the career wise skill-set that differs between finance (let it be quant type or just general capital markets) and the actuarial approach of doing things. In terms of content, up to the intermediate level, they are pretty darn similar if you talking about the quantitative type of finance.

3. Actuarial & Commerce or even Actuarial & Econs, they are probably the most arguably independent set you can ever get within the "commercial stream of businesses". Both program have different focus (some might say actuarial are clearly alot harder than the usual business courses, I will leave that up to your own judgment), you probably do very different stuff along the way of both programs, except some minor reference when insurance are mentioned in commercial context; or actuarial contents talk about management aspects/ the financial statement analysis. Yet, your final year is probably gonna be horrible, when you deal with the final year subjects for both. Its both gonna be time-consuming and tedious. Thats something people dont see it coming.

I have quite a group of friends that did mathematics in uni. I would have to say, apart from just being concerned about how much you can earn, what social prestige does your qualification entitles you for, speaking from the asian background culture; receiving an education is probably alot more than that.
I have among these friends, some that went into Astrophysics research, a few proceeded into their PhD, two of them went for Computer science & programming sort of stuff; while the remaining 5 go into Finance ranging from investment management up to investment banking.
Job Opportunities? Probably you just have to realise without any prior full-time working experience, jobs are not gonna find you, you need to do your research & find them.

Speaking from my own experience, within the 35 actuarial graduates in my cohort, I can hardly point out 10 that really move on to pursue an actuarial career (immediately). A minimal amount of them continued their part II education, a majority of them moved into finance while a significant amount of them move into insurance but not within the actuarial department. As usual, what did the top, brightest & very "money" motivated individuals go into?
They start their own business, trade stocks & engage themselves commercially.
True hard fact is that, working for someone else is not gonna earn you big bucks, if thats what one is concerned about, which is in line with the risk-return proportionality.

What sort of field can an AS degree field go into? Well, depends where you want to get into!
I have heard recent expansion of human Resource management in big firms to hire actuarial graduates for the statistical expertise. The typical finance career had always been a popular option between actuarial grads. Actuarial grads have the sufficient level of background to be trained and take on a statistician career.
Everything in insurance from underwriting to marketing put priority on actuarial talents alot as they understand how the mastermind thinks.
Its the skill set that serve to be of great value rather than what we learn.
I myself did Actuarial & Commerce in uni, but along with some decent mathematics & probability elective courses, I am able to now pursue my masters on mathematics research in the field of Statistical models and mathematical genetics.

The knowledge that an actuarial students is equipped with on statistics, is the reason why we can literally go into any field of interest as long as our skill is deemed useful. Of course thats if you are not picky in terms of
high salary, location, company culture, workload. Sometimes if you are to find yourself unable to pick a suitable job, question yourself about the factors, not the degree.

From time to time I do get job offers from Consumer research institutes, data-centres, and some smaller scale finance firms. So I dont see how actuarial/stats grads are having a hard time pulling off a job.


The last question,
Do you need to be good at anything at all? Not really. I suppose each student that applied to do actuarial science would atleast have a decent background for Calculus & preliminary algebras. Of course you will learn useful formulas & approaches along the way. Economics can be picked up in Uni.
the Mathematical reasoning is fairly minimal, and only used in respect to reasoning the proofs, which does not stand for what you usually need to do. Actuarial part I education with their focus on professional technical exams, had made it quite inline with the asian study culture. "practise makes perfect."
Yeap, the use of extensive exams somehow made exam structures & content somewhat predictable. Dont be surprised how by just repetitively focusing on past years can get you a decent grade.
of course some content are best examined on a coursework basis, yet there will be scaling issues. Eventually you will figure out what type of study person you are. But judging by the fact you are on A-levels, you should be fine.
The highest criteria for an actuarial degree would be persistence & patience. The coverage is sometimes so wide that if you want a good time in uni, its hard for you to be good at everything; but if you are persistent with your studies, you will pull it through. Dont get demotivated with weak marks; I have live examples of friends that was
extremely good when they first started, and somehow got stuck in 1 or 2 courses where they failed to score within their expectation and dropped out. Is it the ego or the call for interest? I dont know. Sometimes its just a hard transition, and dont be surprised to find yourself at ease after going through those horrible transitional courses.

I can go on and on about this. But if you have any specific questions.
I am happy to shed you some light before you commit yourself in a career, you are not quite sure what its about.

wink.gif



YennVIP
post Jul 2 2013, 11:52 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
6 posts

Joined: Jun 2013
QUOTE(RyukA @ Jul 2 2013, 01:49 PM)
I did a double degree in Actuarial & Commerce, where my commerce program covers Accounting and Finance.
Hard to do it with a double degree? Depends on which stage you are talking about;
Is Actuarial Science degree heavier than Finance, Business Management, Investment Banking etc.? I'll learn the basics of other fields too right? What's the percentage of coursework and examination? What University were u in? Did u have a normal social life (sports and entertainment) while studying the degree?

Speaking from my own experience, within the 35 actuarial graduates in my cohort, I can hardly point out 10 that really move on to pursue an actuarial career (immediately). A minimal amount of them continued their part II education, a majority of them moved into finance while a significant amount of them move into insurance but not within the actuarial department. As usual, what did the top, brightest & very "money" motivated individuals go into?
They start their own business, trade stocks & engage themselves commercially.
True hard fact is that, working for someone else is not gonna earn you big bucks, if thats what one is concerned about, which is in line with the risk-return proportionality.
Part I education means honours degree? What's part II and part III? I'm quite sure to further my studies in Actuarial Science degree cuz it seems worth it to train my critical thinking and stuffs while studying a wide variety of things(except science). I don't really aim for A LOT of money, i just want a standard high payment which professional people should have brows.gif

What sort of field can an AS degree field go into? Well, depends where you want to get into!
I have heard recent expansion of human Resource management in big firms to hire actuarial graduates for the statistical expertise. The typical finance career had always been a popular option between actuarial grads. Actuarial grads have the sufficient level of background to be trained and take on a statistician career.
Everything in insurance from underwriting to marketing put priority on actuarial talents alot as they understand how the mastermind thinks.
Its the skill set that serve to be of great value rather than what we learn.
So apparently, i can go into any field(except science and accountancy) with an AS degree? It just depends on how i apply myself right. Got it icon_idea.gif

From time to time I do get job offers from Consumer research institutes, data-centres, and some smaller scale finance firms. So I dont see how actuarial/stats grads are having a hard time pulling off a job.
How did they find u out? U applied for a job there or they came to offer u a job when u're still studying in ur uni? I heard some of my friends had a few job offers when they haven't even finish their degree.

Do you need to be good at anything at all? Not really. I suppose each student that applied to do actuarial science would atleast have a decent background for Calculus & preliminary algebras. Of course you will learn useful formulas & approaches along the way. Economics can be picked up in Uni.
In AS, is it Stats>Maths>Finance>Econs? How much percentage coverage does each of them has? Btw i'm not really good in Econs but better in Maths and interested in Finance(Don't have a clue whether i'll be doing well in it).

I can go on and on about this. But if you have any specific questions.
I am happy to shed you some light before you commit yourself in a career, you are not quite sure what its about.
Can i have ur top5 suggestion for these UK Universities regarding to their AS degree: Uni of Warwick, Uni of Kent, City Uni, Uni of East Anglia, Heriot-Watt, Uni of Leceister, Uni of Southampton, Manchester Uni, Queen's Uni Belfast.

wink.gif Thanks for answering me and i appreciate every details u've provided, it really helps! thumbup.gif
*
[cool.gif[/B][cool.gif
RyukA
post Jul 3 2013, 12:29 PM

On my way
****
Senior Member
612 posts

Joined: Jan 2010


QUOTE(YennVIP @ Jul 2 2013, 11:52 PM)
[cool.gif[/B][cool.gif
*
Is Actuarial Science degree heavier than Finance, Business Management, Investment Banking etc.? I'll learn the basics of other fields too right? What's the percentage of coursework and examination? What University were u in? Did u have a normal social life (sports and entertainment) while studying the degree?
well not really. actuarial science is basically the control of financial risk, or in a general sense, everything to do with the concept of insurance. the actuarial education is to cater the students need to understand all the risk dimensions pertaining insurance. Mathematics & Statistics is the structure, while finance, commerce and also economics are the contents. Conventionally actuarial courses are heavily weighted on exams, thats because it is how the profession works, to obtain membership from these actuarial institutes require you to clear countless papers. But in terms of university courses, it really depends on the sylabus coverage and how the lecturer decide its assessment.
I did all my uni in Australian national. I dont know what you mean by normal social life, or how our standards might differ. I am not one of those top-scorer, so casually I dont feel very loaded all the time. But as the finals are approaching, we do get a little tensed up. Afterall, university is really more than just a conventional school, its about networking, finding true self, and learn to manage things as an independent adult. Stress comes and goes when the workload & quizes pile up. which is perfectly normal. If you feel stressed up all the time, you probably need to re-evaluate your lifestyle and expectations.



Part I education means honours degree? What's part II and part III? I'm quite sure to further my studies in Actuarial Science degree cuz it seems worth it to train my critical thinking and stuffs while studying a wide variety of things(except science). I don't really aim for A LOT of money, i just want a standard high payment which professional people should have

I am not sure about the Actuarial Hons or no-Hons system, since the australian intepretation of Honours is very different from UK (well, literally in UK, most 3yr degree comes with hons.. thats another topic by itself).
Part II & Part III refers to the continuation of the actuarial examination for you to qualify as a certified fellow in the actuarial institute. Part II focuses alot on getting all the technical skills introduced in Part I, and synthesize to a real insurance scenario, pertaining the actuarial control cycles and focuses on the management aspects of actuarial controls. So be prepared for a decent amount of articles & essays. Part III puts on its emphasis on the professionalism conducts, ethics and commercial aspects of the actuarial industry. Here, candidates will also have to pick a specialization route e.g. Life Insurance, General Ins, Investments etc
If you are lucky and extremely talented, you can finish all the parts in 6 years time, thats the minimal time.



So apparently, i can go into any field(except science and accountancy) with an AS degree? It just depends on how i apply myself right. Got it

Frankly speaking, in a world today, degree is probably the very basic qualification to seek for employments.
Not just AS, in fact alot of degrees give you the same flexibility to "go into whatever you like" as long as it is not a highly technical job.
The reason why actuarial grads seems to be able to enter any industry is the fact that an actuarial degree is nothing very different from a classical statistic degree. Except of course, society always deem actuarial degree as a "glorified" statistics/math degree. when in fact, this group of statistician just happen to earn the most due to the profit channels in insurance businesses.
However, using what you learn and apply it to a distinctive new field/area is part of your skill. Some people just dont know how to bring the skill set across different disciplines.



How did they find u out? U applied for a job there or they came to offer u a job when u're still studying in ur uni? I heard some of my friends had a few job offers when they haven't even finish their degree.
Of course, like I said, you always have to establish the contact. Not being too picky, always leave you with lots of opportunities to explore with. From time to time, feel free to take aptitude assessments, and career tests to understand more about yourself that you are not aware of. Its normal that some bright students get headhunted even before graduating. But all these dont come without hard effort.

In AS, is it Stats>Maths>Finance>Econs? How much percentage coverage does each of them has? Btw i'm not really good in Econs but better in Maths and interested in Finance(Don't have a clue whether i'll be doing well in it).

Its a combination of finance, economics and lots of statistics. The math you need is fairly preliminary, just calculus and algebras. I cant really break down the portion for each. But the general guideline is that, not so much of accounting & economics, but a lot of statistics & finance, remember its everything about the fundamental insurance contents.




Can i have ur top5 suggestion for these UK Universities regarding to their AS degree: Uni of Warwick, Uni of Kent, City Uni, Uni of East Anglia, Heriot-Watt, Uni of Leceister, Uni of Southampton, Manchester Uni, Queen's Uni Belfast.
I have no 1st hand experience with any UK Universities. but I can give you some idea of what to look for based on the academic integrity & practicality of their course with respect to real actuarial work.
1. UCL
2. Warwick
3. Kent
4. Heriot-Watt


It is normal to feel anxious and excited with what you want to study in future.
However, I can almost assure you that as time goes by, your perception changes, and you will find yourself at times reevaluating things that you deem of great value. In fact, most of us would find ourselves doing things driven by the dynamic changes of our own choices, as well as the significant element of pure chance.
So dont try too hard laying down a path to be walked 10 years down the road. Focus on the short-term goals, and get the most out of it. Your parents might advice you otherwise due to the type of culture & society one is bought up with. but always remember, your talent does not cater specifically to just one area/industry. Spend some time and explore all your options.



YennVIP
post Jul 3 2013, 08:42 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
6 posts

Joined: Jun 2013
@RyukA

Okay i think i have everything clear for now rclxm9.gif Thanks for the help! thumbup.gif
Searingmage
post Jul 5 2013, 12:14 AM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,809 posts

Joined: Feb 2010


QUOTE(YennVIP @ Jul 3 2013, 08:42 PM)
@RyukA

Okay i think i have everything clear for now rclxm9.gif Thanks for the help! thumbup.gif
*
Ryuka pretty much answered all of your question, but I've something small to add..
Personally, I would advice against going for an Actuarial Degree unless you're really interested in Actuarial Science.
Taking AS and not going into actuarial field is pretty much like taking ACCA but decided not to go in to accountancy field.
That being said, it doesn't mean that you can't find other jobs with an AS degree. There're still a lot of job opportunities.
But the question is, why AS? If you're interested in IB or finance, then take up financial engineering, investment-related degree etc.. AS is a very specific course which specialize on the insurance industry (in general). Hence, most of your knowledge learnt will not be applied directly (all knowledge can be applied indirectly... so, it's not to say that what you learnt will be wasted) in your working life..
I would suggest going for the course which you think will benefit you the most after graduating..
YennVIP
post Jul 7 2013, 08:40 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
6 posts

Joined: Jun 2013
QUOTE(Searingmage @ Jul 5 2013, 12:14 AM)
Ryuka pretty much answered all of your question, but I've something small to add..
Personally, I would advice against going for an Actuarial Degree unless you're really interested in Actuarial Science.
Taking AS and not going into actuarial field is pretty much like taking ACCA but decided not to go in to accountancy field.
That being said, it doesn't mean that you can't find other jobs with an AS degree. There're still a lot of job opportunities.
But the question is, why AS? If you're interested in IB or finance, then take up financial engineering, investment-related degree etc.. AS is a very specific course which specialize on the insurance industry (in general). Hence, most of your knowledge learnt will not be applied directly (all knowledge can be applied indirectly... so, it's not to say that what you learnt will be wasted) in your working life..
I would suggest going for the course which you think will benefit you the most after graduating..
*
No i think it's not right to compare AS with ACCA. In AS, i'll be learning part of finance, investment management, insurance, economics and maybe the basic of accountancy. ACCA is just about accounting, its more specific than AS.

Why AS? Because i've never learned any of these stuffs and i'm not sure which one i'm capable of. I'll be introduced to a wide variety of arts field stuffs and by learning part of them i'll be able to know what i'm more interested in. Despite the knowledge i'll gain, i can develop my critical thinking in this degree. I'm sure there's lots of thing that i'll learn in AS degree will be useful in the future. It just depends on how i apply the skills i learn.

Thanks for ur piece of advice, i appreciate it biggrin.gif
adele123
post Jul 7 2013, 10:44 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
4,724 posts

Joined: Jul 2013


masih ada orang tak mau dengar...

seriously, if you want to be introduced to a wide variety of arts field, you might as well go for Finance/Economics degree.

it may not seem a big deal wasting 2 years learning sciences (in form 4 and 5) and then not use it for the rest your life. it's an entirely different story when you waste 3 years doing a degree and going down a different path.

No, it's not a perfect comparison for AS and ACCA. It's just a way of saying i studied A, B, C ended up doing X, Y, Z.

AS is very very very specific (as mentioned by someone). just because i have to learnt economics and finance, doesn't make me more "exposed" to other "arts" related field.

$0.02 don't be stubborn. talk to some real life people and instead of reading about how much ppl earn as an actuary...
RyukA
post Jul 8 2013, 01:26 PM

On my way
****
Senior Member
612 posts

Joined: Jan 2010


QUOTE(adele123 @ Jul 7 2013, 10:44 PM)
masih ada orang tak mau dengar...

1. seriously, if you want to be introduced to a wide variety of arts field, you might as well go for Finance/Economics degree.

2.it may not seem a big deal wasting 2 years learning sciences (in form 4 and 5) and then not use it for the rest your life. it's an entirely different story when you waste 3 years doing a degree and going down a different path.

3.No, it's not a perfect comparison for AS and ACCA. It's just a way of saying i studied A, B, C ended up doing X, Y, Z.

4.AS is very very very specific (as mentioned by someone). just because i have to learnt economics and finance, doesn't make me more "exposed" to other "arts" related field.

$0.02 don't be stubborn. talk to some real life people and instead of reading about how much ppl earn as an actuary...
*
1. Every field can earn a living one way or the other. preference is a matter of personal choice. Nothing very objective when it comes that. Besides, I dont see the connection between picking up wide variety of arts or social science subject being linked up with finance/econ. To be exact, everything is connected in a practical sense, but that doesnt mean one is more favourable to the other in an absolute manner.

2. I know bunch of high profile leaders, academicians, and senior management staffs that are working in a field not directly related to their undergraduate degree. There's no waste if you know what you want, or what you can gain from that program, because every step does take you closer to what you really can/want to do. So, I dont see that as a primary concern, because you would be darn sure, you will either get a feeling that you might be wrong at some point in time as your career progress, or you might just live with it.

3. Yes. It is a valid comparison. It was referred to the act of taking on a professional qualification education that cater to that specific profession, yet end up not practicing that profession. You can quote me bunch of business leaders (like Tony Fernandez) that had ACCA yet did not practise accounting; while I can also give you examples of insurance CEO that hold actuarial qualification yet does not practise as an actuary. These pointless examples still doesnt disregard the truth of that statement.

4. The more you learn, the broader you go, the more exposure you gain. AS is specific in a sense it is objectively catered for all the issues and risk dimensions pertaining the insurance business. Specific in terms of skill set? no. Skills that you gain from an AS degree, can be intepreted as a good blend of problem based solving, engineering, computational, critical and analytical reasoning skills.


LightningFist
post Jul 8 2013, 07:24 PM

Minion of the Damned
Group Icon
VIP
3,965 posts

Joined: Apr 2009
QUOTE(YennVIP @ Jun 29 2013, 02:52 AM)
1. Is it hard to take double degrees with actuarial science? I have a strong interest in Maths but Mathematics degree can't take me any further right? i might end up being a lecturer or researcher.

2. I pretty much have interest in probabilities and investment. I've decided to take AS degree but i don't plan to become an actuary, will it be a waste? Is an Actuarial Science degree more valuable than other degrees since we can switch to other fields such as investment and risk management? Is it possible to become a financial consultancy with an AS degree?

3. What field can i enter if i'm an AS degree holder other than risk management and insurance? Can i enter marketing and business field?

4. In Actuarial Science degree, u need to have a stronger Maths or Econs? Like which is more preferable, i don't want the answer 'They must be equally good'.

Please answer my questions>< thanks!
*
1. Depends, on the school, on the timing. If you're talking about double degrees, you're talking about Australia, and they have 2 semesters you might start in. For at least some cases, in the past, it may have been easier to do a double degree if you enrolled during a bad semester, making Actuarial/Economics, or Commerce, or Finance, easier than straight Actuarial. That was fixed so straight Actuarial degrees are easier now. But still, Actuarial + Econ/Comm/Finance/Stats is not much more difficult (Stats>Econ/Finance, Comm depends on major) compared to straight Actuarial, but Law probably is, Maths definitely is harder.

3. Mktg and Business don't really have requisites.

QUOTE(YennVIP @ Jun 30 2013, 10:59 PM)
I'm not really good in Econs but better in Maths and interested in Finance. If there's Maths, Statistics, Econs and Finance, how many percentage do they cover in an AS degree?

I'm currently studying A-levels and preparing to apply for 5 UK universities. How would u rate University of Warwick, City University, University of Kent, University of East Anglia and University of Southampton, from best to worst?
*
In Actuarial you only do up to Intermediate Macroeconomics (considered 3rd year by NUS/American standards), and basic Intro Microeconomics. So you only need to be average at Econ (at least a 60/65 by Australian standards).

The bulk of the work is Statistics, either Applied Stats or Mathematical Statistics. Given 8 classes a year / 4 every semester, I have in the entire degree only 1 pure Math (not Stats related) class, 3 Econ classes, 1 Accounting class, 5 compulsory Finance classes (although 1 is Mathematical Finance), 4 electives (they don't have to be Business related), the rest are Stats.

Overall Warwick is clear first, Soton second. For Actuarial City is clear first, Soton is not bad, Warwick doesn't have all exemptions in 4 years but it should be a good school.

QUOTE(studyboy @ Jul 1 2013, 10:49 PM)
For your own sake, please do not study a degree in Mathematics. Mathematics at university is different from A levels altogether! Practice makes perfect no longer applies and Mathematical aptitude overulls. Take it from me YennVIP. I have studied Mathematics in the UK for 4 years and ended up almost jobless in Malaysia. Now, I am faced with another dilemma as I dislike finance which render my employment options more limited than ever.

On a side note, a friend of mine is at UEA studying for her PhD in Applied Mathematics.  smile.gif
*
This. Aptitude is more important. You might understand a class reasonably well (say more than half) and get 70-90+ in assignments or mid term exams, but end up failing the final exam because you couldn't do three quarters of it. While someone who could do about half the exam ends up with an A. It applies to Maths or Physics at A Level or Pre U too, to the extent that it scales with ability (someone capable of enrolling in a Maths degree won't feel that way during A Level, but other people not so good at Maths might).

Understand that at university, most all the people doing what you do, your peers, are also better at Math than average. But if you can beat them, by just a little bit, you can get As and Bs.

This post has been edited by LightningFist: Jul 8 2013, 07:26 PM
Searingmage
post Jul 12 2013, 07:33 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,809 posts

Joined: Feb 2010


QUOTE(YennVIP @ Jul 7 2013, 08:40 PM)
No i think it's not right to compare AS with ACCA. In AS, i'll be learning part of finance, investment management, insurance, economics and maybe the basic of accountancy. ACCA is just about accounting, its more specific than AS.

Why AS? Because i've never learned any of these stuffs and i'm not sure which one i'm capable of. I'll be introduced to a wide variety of arts field stuffs and by learning part of them i'll be able to know what i'm more interested in. Despite the knowledge i'll gain, i can develop my critical thinking in this degree. I'm sure there's lots of thing that i'll learn in AS degree will be useful in the future. It just depends on how i apply the skills i learn.

Thanks for ur piece of advice, i appreciate it biggrin.gif
*
By questioning you "Why AS?" I'm implying you hv a misconception of thinking AS has a wide variety of arts field stuffs. I'm implying that no, you won't gain a wide variety of arts field stuffs. It's more like touch and go only, which other courses (such as finance, investment etc) offers as well..

I re-iterate, AS is a very specific course. You will spend about 60-80% (depending on Uni) learning stuffs that is specifically meant for those interested in going the Actuarial world. By studying AS, you will at most know the elementary part of what you're interested in only.

If you are not interested in AS to begin with, I see no reason to spend 60-80% of your time studying things that you will not be able to use directly..
gane.dante
post Dec 2 2013, 07:56 PM

New Member
*
Newbie
1 posts

Joined: Dec 2013
hei guys, is it possible with doing about 4 or 5 papers, i can get a decent job with a decent salary??
ZeonKid
post Dec 3 2013, 10:08 AM

New Member
*
Junior Member
48 posts

Joined: Dec 2013
QUOTE(gane.dante @ Dec 2 2013, 07:56 PM)
hei guys, is it possible with doing about 4 or 5 papers, i can get a decent job with a decent salary??
*
4 ~ 5 papers get you the chance to interview, not the job. and you have to be first class and have good communication skills . I have friend with 5 passing papers, could not get any actuarial job.

For fresh graduate, normally your salary will not be adjusted/increased for the papers you have passed, so it would be the same. I do know there is one company that adjusts your starting salary for papers you have passed. but the starting salary is low(lower than rm2500, with 5 passing papers you get somewhere near RM3000, but not more than that)

there is a lot of candidates that i have met/interviewed with at least 4 papers or lot of exemptions, but could not get actuarial jobs due to various reasons.

conclusion: job opportunity for actuarial graduate is very very low. less than 30% of actuarial graduate actually get the actuarial job.

kirsi
post Jan 5 2014, 11:38 AM

New Member
*
Newbie
4 posts

Joined: Jan 2014
i hope this thread is still active..

tbh ive been offered a loan from mara in the AS course in taylors (i applied for it by using my trial result) which means i have to enroll by january

the problem is ive started doubting whether i should accept it or not. yes i too like most of the people are into maths. so id like to ask do the jobs where AS graduates work as involve a lot of communication? since communication skill is vital when im not that good in communicating (though i probably can improve myself during adp) in what kind of way do they communicate? (im sorry im just not good in explaining i might as well reject the offer..)

help im just really torn between to accept the offer not
kirsi
post Jan 5 2014, 12:10 PM

New Member
*
Newbie
4 posts

Joined: Jan 2014
i just want to make a decision that ill regret the least. there are always pros and cons. it would be actually pretty hard for me after spm as i would likely to compete w everyone in the country for another scholarship other than mara. i was an mrsm student so it would be quite a loss if i couldnt get loan/scholarship from mara :c

im terribly in dilemma so if i am to reject it there will still be lots of chances out there right

This post has been edited by kirsi: Jan 5 2014, 04:16 PM
mumeichan
post Jan 6 2014, 07:34 AM

Member
*******
Senior Member
4,152 posts

Joined: May 2005
QUOTE(kirsi @ Jan 5 2014, 11:38 AM)
i hope this thread is still active..

tbh ive been offered a loan from mara in the AS course in taylors (i applied for it by using my trial result) which means i have to enroll by january

the problem is ive started doubting whether i should accept it or not. yes i too like most of the people are into maths. so id like to ask do the jobs where AS graduates work as involve a lot of communication? since communication skill is vital when im not that good in communicating (though i probably can improve myself during adp) in what kind of way do they communicate? (im sorry im just not good in explaining i might as well reject the offer..)

help im just really torn between to accept the offer not
*
There's not a lot of math is AS. Don't be disappointed later
Searingmage
post Jan 6 2014, 07:37 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,809 posts

Joined: Feb 2010


QUOTE(kirsi @ Jan 5 2014, 11:38 AM)
i hope this thread is still active..

tbh ive been offered a loan from mara in the AS course in taylors (i applied for it by using my trial result) which means i have to enroll by january

the problem is ive started doubting whether i should accept it or not. yes i too like most of the people are into maths. so id like to ask do the jobs where AS graduates work as involve a lot of communication? since communication skill is vital when im not that good in communicating (though i probably can improve myself during adp) in what kind of way do they communicate? (im sorry im just not good in explaining i might as well reject the offer..)

help im just really torn between to accept the offer not
*
In general, AS doesn't require a lot of communication skills.
But, the work of AS doesn't generally involve lots of maths... And if your reason to be interested in AS is because you like maths, perhaps you're looking at the wrong field.. While maths plays a vital part of AS (i.e. you do hv to be good at maths), it's not the sole factor, neither is it the main point...
There are a lot of other aspects which doesn't require maths as well.
Also, when you say you like maths, you also have to determine what type of maths you like. Some like calculus, others algebra, some others statistics and probability. The maths is AS is probably not the maths you think you like.. It's mostly Actuarial Mathematics and Financial Mathematics.
mumeichan
post Jan 6 2014, 09:21 PM

Member
*******
Senior Member
4,152 posts

Joined: May 2005
QUOTE(Searingmage @ Jan 6 2014, 07:37 PM)
In general, AS doesn't require a lot of communication skills.
But, the work of AS doesn't generally involve lots of maths... And if your reason to be interested in AS is because you like maths, perhaps you're looking at the wrong field.. While maths plays a vital part of AS (i.e. you do hv to be good at maths), it's not the sole factor, neither is it the main point...
There are a lot of other aspects which doesn't require maths as well.
Also, when you say you like maths, you also have to determine what type of maths you like. Some like calculus, others algebra, some others statistics and probability. The maths is AS is probably not the maths you think you like.. It's mostly Actuarial Mathematics and Financial Mathematics.
*
A typical Malaysia high school leaver wouldn't know this, nor are they hardworking enough to find out. That's what I've gathered after posting here for years.
Searingmage
post Jan 6 2014, 10:25 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,809 posts

Joined: Feb 2010


QUOTE(mumeichan @ Jan 6 2014, 09:21 PM)
A typical Malaysia high school leaver wouldn't know this, nor are they hardworking enough to find out. That's what I've gathered after posting here for years.
*
Quite true.. Had one simply read this whole thread, he/she would've gathered most answers that we answered..
mumeichan
post Jan 9 2014, 09:49 PM

Member
*******
Senior Member
4,152 posts

Joined: May 2005
QUOTE(Searingmage @ Jan 6 2014, 10:25 PM)
Quite true.. Had one simply read this whole thread, he/she would've gathered most answers that we answered..
*
I've been recommending Spivak's Calculus for year and I doubt any one here has ever bought that book to actually test if they like math or not.
Critical_Fallacy
post Jan 9 2014, 10:40 PM

∫nnộvisεr
Group Icon
VIP
3,713 posts

Joined: Nov 2011
From: Torino
QUOTE(mumeichan @ Jan 9 2014, 09:49 PM)
I've been recommending Spivak's Calculus for year and I doubt any one here has ever bought that book to actually test if they like math or not.
You mean the "Yellow Pigs"? sweat.gif
mumeichan
post Jan 9 2014, 10:43 PM

Member
*******
Senior Member
4,152 posts

Joined: May 2005
QUOTE(Critical_Fallacy @ Jan 9 2014, 10:40 PM)
You mean the "Yellow Pigs"? sweat.gif
*
Yes that Spivak. He's an amazing author.
ZeonKid
post Jan 14 2014, 09:14 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
48 posts

Joined: Dec 2013
QUOTE(kirsi @ Jan 5 2014, 12:10 PM)
i just want to make a decision that ill regret the least. there are always pros and cons. it would be actually pretty hard for me after spm as i would likely to compete w everyone in the country for another scholarship other than mara. i was an mrsm student so it would be quite a loss if i couldnt get loan/scholarship from mara :c

im terribly in dilemma so if i am to reject it there will still be lots of chances out there right
*
communication skill is important and is the factor for you to get an actuarial job. normally only first class students will be invited to interview for actuarial job. and during the interview your communication skill is the key since everyone has excellent results. anyway i think this applies to many other competitive jobs as well.

ok aside from this, being an actuary, you need to be able to explain numbers to people like CEO, clients, your boss and etc. there is a lot of communication in actuarial job especially high level position. many of the times you will have to explain the methodology, numbers, assumptions made and many other things.

Hysteridull
post Jan 23 2014, 11:01 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
34 posts

Joined: Mar 2011


Boy am I glad I decided to study applied maths! Despite being bombarded with questions like "Why not study actuarial science, your starting pay will be good, it's rewarding etc etc", I was quite hellbent on doing applied maths because at least at some point, I would have the option of either majoring in pure maths, statistics or computing.

Currently studying in UTAR where there are at least 150 students per intake taking Actuarial Science. As for applied maths, the most for each intake is 15-20.
It's actually a bit unfortunate because I'd like to think that at least by doing AM, you get to equip yourself with nifty programming skills (I've studied C, C++, C#, Java, PHP, SQL and I'm only in year 2 lol.) and that enough will make pretty valuable to any future employer (Taking into account you have good PR skills and a sharp, non-robotic mind)

I don't deny that AS is a pretty tough course and I salute people who can study their arses off and succeed, but when you graduate, you're adding yourself into another glut of AS graduates. That alone makes the competition so fierce, it's almost impossible to start out well.

TL;DR: So freaking glad I'm doing AM and loving it!
BravoZeroTwo
post Jan 24 2014, 06:58 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,128 posts

Joined: Jul 2012
QUOTE(Hysteridull @ Jan 24 2014, 12:01 AM)
Boy am I glad I decided to study applied maths!  Despite being bombarded with questions like "Why not study actuarial science, your starting pay will be good, it's rewarding etc etc", I was quite hellbent on doing applied maths because at least at some point, I would have the option of either majoring in pure maths, statistics or computing.

Currently studying in UTAR where there are at least 150 students per intake taking Actuarial Science. As for applied maths, the most for each intake is 15-20.
It's actually a bit unfortunate because I'd like to think that at least by doing AM, you get to equip yourself with nifty programming skills (I've studied C, C++, C#, Java, PHP, SQL and I'm only in year 2 lol.) and that enough will make pretty valuable to any future employer (Taking into account you have good PR skills and a sharp, non-robotic mind)

I don't deny that AS is a pretty tough course and I salute people who can study their arses off and succeed, but when you graduate, you're adding yourself into another glut of AS graduates. That alone makes the competition so fierce, it's almost impossible to start out well.

TL;DR: So freaking glad I'm doing AM and loving it!
*
can share more about the jobs that one can do with AM ? notice you are studying computer programming languages ? is it not that overlapping with Comp Science/IT ? thanks.
Hysteridull
post Jan 25 2014, 01:45 AM

New Member
*
Junior Member
34 posts

Joined: Mar 2011


QUOTE(BravoZeroTwo @ Jan 24 2014, 06:58 PM)
can share more about the jobs that one can do with AM ? notice you are studying computer programming languages ? is it not that overlapping with Comp Science/IT ? thanks.
*
I've studied about 3-4 languages per year and honestly, I only remember the ones that my simple mind can analyse easily. rclxms.gif I've about 2 years more to go and I guess when I'm done, I'll have more than just basic knowledge in a few languages, provided I do my revision from time to time. As for overlap, yeah it does. But I guess applied maths is more wider in coverage whereas CS/IT is more deeper when it comes to computing smile.gif

Good thing is this isn't a course with limited job scope. You can end up becoming a system admin, webmaster, cryptologist, market/system analyst, statistician, foreign exchange trader, portfolio analysts etc. It all depends in what you decide to major in.
I'm interested in cryptology and my final year project is gonna be based on that, so there's always a possibility that I end up a consultant for IT companies specializing in encryption software. Fingers crossed!

One thing I stress on is never to take this course (or any other) just for the sake of a fancy named degree or whatev. Do it for learning and you'll be surprised at how fun it really can be. Not saying job prospects aren't important, but you need to bring something to the table instead of just a transcript smile.gif

Sorry for the wordiness!
BravoZeroTwo
post Jan 25 2014, 04:03 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,128 posts

Joined: Jul 2012
QUOTE(Hysteridull @ Jan 25 2014, 02:45 AM)
I've studied about 3-4 languages per year and honestly, I only remember the ones that my simple mind can analyse easily. rclxms.gif I've about 2 years more to go and I guess when I'm done, I'll have more than just basic knowledge in a few languages, provided I do my revision from time to time. As for overlap, yeah it does. But I guess applied maths is more wider in coverage whereas CS/IT is more deeper when it comes to computing smile.gif

Good thing is this isn't a course with limited job scope. You can end up becoming a system admin, webmaster, cryptologist, market/system analyst, statistician, foreign exchange trader, portfolio analysts etc. It all depends in what you decide to major in.
I'm interested in cryptology and my final year project is gonna be based on that, so there's always a possibility that I end up a consultant for IT companies specializing in encryption software. Fingers crossed!

One thing I stress on is never to take this course (or any other) just for the sake of a fancy named degree or whatev. Do it for learning and you'll be surprised at how fun it really can be. Not saying job prospects aren't important, but you need to bring something to the table instead of just a transcript smile.gif

Sorry for the wordiness!
*
Hi there,
would like you to share about the subjects you are taking for AM. What's AM all about ? how did you discover that AM is what you want to study ? thanks in advance for sharing here.
Searingmage
post Jan 26 2014, 09:41 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,809 posts

Joined: Feb 2010


QUOTE(BravoZeroTwo @ Jan 25 2014, 04:03 PM)
Hi there,
would like you to share about the subjects you are taking for AM. What's AM all about ? how did you discover that AM is what you want to study ? thanks in advance for sharing here.
*
Hi, AM in UTAR is Applied Maths with Computing. Hence, it consist of 2 parts - Mathematical part, and programming part.
For mathematical part, you will learn calculus, probability and statistical subjects. IINM, you get to choose at your later years whether you want to enter more "pure" maths type, or more "statsitical-maths" type.
Programming language I'm not sure how many you'll learn but it's quite a few and it's quite in-depth.

Hopefully my info help.

Though, try not to deviate too much from this thread's topic (i.e. actuarial science)
Valentineday
post Feb 20 2014, 06:17 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
478 posts

Joined: Apr 2006
hihi...anyone know which campus offer part time actuarial sciences programs?
tanxiaoming
post Feb 23 2014, 03:19 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
6 posts

Joined: Sep 2011
I hope there is someone still active for this post...
So I got offers for actuarial science degree for LSE(very high reputation uni), city university (cass) (one of the uni offer best act. science undergrad) and uni of waterloo ( said to be the uni offer the best act. science programme in nothern America)... I wanna get some suggestions... which uni should I go for...
BravoZeroTwo
post Feb 24 2014, 07:45 AM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,128 posts

Joined: Jul 2012
QUOTE(tanxiaoming @ Feb 23 2014, 04:19 PM)
I hope there is someone still active for this post...
So I got offers for actuarial science degree for LSE(very high reputation uni), city university (cass) (one of the uni offer best act. science undergrad) and uni of waterloo ( said to be the uni offer the best act. science programme in nothern America)... I wanna get some suggestions... which uni should I go for...
*
Congrats on your achievement. Which pre-U qualification you used to apply ? Thanks.
tanxiaoming
post Feb 24 2014, 10:41 AM

New Member
*
Junior Member
6 posts

Joined: Sep 2011
GCE A Level but still.. I really need suggestions!!!
ratloverice
post Feb 24 2014, 05:11 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Junior Member
804 posts

Joined: May 2010
QUOTE(tanxiaoming @ Feb 23 2014, 09:41 PM)
GCE A Level but still.. I really need suggestions!!!
*
I would choose UW if I were you. It is quite famous for its ActSc.

PS: The co-op program is not an easy program. Most of my seniors who are studying there couldn't find a job for internship due to the low supply of job.
tanxiaoming
post Feb 27 2014, 09:40 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
6 posts

Joined: Sep 2011
QUOTE(ratloverice @ Feb 24 2014, 05:11 PM)
I would choose UW if I were you. It is quite famous for its ActSc.

PS: The co-op program is not an easy program. Most of my seniors who are studying there couldn't find a job for internship due to the low supply of job.
*
I applied to regular one u mean ur seniors couldn't find a job after graduated or during the co-op time
Searingmage
post Feb 27 2014, 10:56 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,809 posts

Joined: Feb 2010


QUOTE(tanxiaoming @ Feb 27 2014, 09:40 PM)
I applied to regular one u mean ur seniors couldn't find a job after graduated or during the co-op time
*
During the co-op time, it's very difficult to find job.
And things aren't exactly rosy once you graduated either..

Anyway, depends on you really..
If you're looking to advance your path in UK paper, go for UK uni..
If you're looking for US paper, then waterloo is the way to go (among the best uni that offers AS in north america)
All are good uni, you won't go wrong with any...
ratloverice
post Mar 1 2014, 05:30 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Junior Member
804 posts

Joined: May 2010
QUOTE(tanxiaoming @ Feb 27 2014, 08:40 AM)
I applied to regular one u mean ur seniors couldn't find a job after graduated or during the co-op time
*
During co-op time. The demand for jobs is much more than the supply of jobs. Some of them had to come back to msia for internship.
tanxiaoming
post Mar 1 2014, 11:25 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
6 posts

Joined: Sep 2011
so which way (UK or US) is better to go that can get job easier?
Searingmage
post Mar 2 2014, 01:40 AM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,809 posts

Joined: Feb 2010


QUOTE(tanxiaoming @ Mar 1 2014, 11:25 PM)
so which way (UK or US) is better to go that can get job easier?
*
AFAIK, there is no difference in difficulty of getting a job (in Malaysia)
tanxiaoming
post Mar 3 2014, 10:39 AM

New Member
*
Junior Member
6 posts

Joined: Sep 2011
QUOTE(Searingmage @ Mar 2 2014, 01:40 AM)
AFAIK, there is no difference in difficulty of getting a job (in Malaysia)
*
I would like to find a job there but not in Malaysia.. I mean US or UK has more job opportunity for actuaries.
ratloverice
post Mar 3 2014, 05:32 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Junior Member
804 posts

Joined: May 2010
QUOTE(tanxiaoming @ Mar 2 2014, 09:39 PM)
I would like to find a job there but not in Malaysia.. I mean US or UK has more job opportunity for actuaries.
*
As an international student/a foreigner, there is not much difference between the job opportuniy in both the US and UK unless you are very outstanding. They are currently having a quite-high unemployment rate.
Searingmage
post Mar 3 2014, 07:08 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,809 posts

Joined: Feb 2010


ratloverice says it all..
Crazy.SoT.Gila
post Mar 19 2014, 02:08 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,704 posts

Joined: Sep 2005
From: Oil Town


QUOTE(tanxiaoming @ Mar 2 2014, 10:39 PM)
I would like to find a job there but not in Malaysia.. I mean US or UK has more job opportunity for actuaries.
*
A bit late to the conversation, but I'll weigh in my experience. Waterloo grad here, currently working in Canada.

I do not have first-hand account of UK university life, but from what I have heard from 2 exchange students from Heriott-Watt is that things are more stressful in UW. That is partly because we used to not have any exam exemptions - so students need to focus on school and SOA exams.

CIA now has exemptions so that may ease off some stress, but as I don't qualify for it I have not really looked into the details. One thing to consider is whether or not SOA recognises the exemptions.

As for job opportunity, I believe in most places supply definitely outnumbers demand. However, an equally important consideration is work eligibility. Again, I am not familiar with UK's POV. For Canada, there's a Post-Graduate Work Program (PGWP) Visa.

PGWP gives you an open work visa (any employer - any field) for a length up to the length of your study, capped at a maximum of 3 years. Acceptance is almost guaranteed, and you do not need to have a job lined up. Also an important merit of the PGWP is that employers do not need to apply for a special Labour Market Opinion to hire you despite being a foreign national. This means that you are playing a level field vs. Canadians (shh, don't tell them that).

After this, PR requirements do not seem too hard to meet either. This of course, may change by the time you're done with school - who knows?

As for joining UW as a regular student (which I did so because of lackluster grades in my ADP) - personally I'd advise against it if you qualify for co-op, but I know of at least one senior who quit co-op (due to additional fees) and handled his own "work terms". Most of my friends did their first co-op in Malaysia or Singapore, and managed to get Canadian positions after that. But yes - it is tough and competitive. You need to juggle your studies and job search at the same time. Kudos to the co-op students, really.

If you do not go into the co-op program, make sure you try your very best to imitate the program yourself. I did not and I regret it. Upon graduation, I was competing with my peers who have 2 years of work experience. No shit, it took me a long time and it was tough - not to mention I'll consider it luck that I got my current role. Most friends who were in co-op managed to secure an offer/multiple offers before graduation. Those that did not, had their roles shortly after.

Another plus of the co-op program - pay is good. From low twenties to high twenties (and rare low thirties) per hour. You can support a few terms of tuition through co-op pay. Not sure about internship pay, but I would assume that it is similar/slightly lower.

Wherever you go, try looking into their exchange program. That's another thing I regret not doing.

Last piece of advice - look into other programs that the universities offer. You may find something that interests you more. Personally, I was drawn to Computing and Financial Management at UW but unfortunately it was a co-op only program.

All the best!

This post has been edited by Crazy.SoT.Gila: Mar 19 2014, 02:14 PM
Igloo0000
post Apr 7 2014, 07:46 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
54 posts

Joined: Apr 2014
I'm a qualified actuary working in the USA for years. Few more misconceptions/knowledge I would like to share:

1. There are many types of actuaries and they are very different.
I work in the P&C field. Other actuaries work in life, health, pension or even outside of insurance industry. Actuaries within these field can be furthered granularized to specific function. Like in P&C, most actuaries work in traditional roles in either pricing or reserving. Some actuaries work in non-traditional roles, such as predictive modeling, cat modeling, etc. I spend most of my career developing highly complicated capital models for insurance companies for regulatory compliance, which I believe is a very rare skill in Malaysia. But here is the states, or in EU, this skill is highly sought. I know some traditional reserving methodologies, but I am more familiar with the stochastic reserving. So the point is, there is a distinct difference between actuaries in each field, and the discrepancy still exist between each function within a field. I can hardly communicate "actuarially" with a life/pension actuary, and vice versa I guess. Or if I were to change my specialization to P&C pricing, I would be a complete newbie.

2. Actuarial field is more than what you think it is.
Most actuaries in Asia work on the life side, which is understandable since the P&C market in Asia is not as mature as in the states. But because of this their concept of "What an actuary does" is very limited. Just try to ask one of them what is a cat model and how actuaries make use of them. I can tell 90% of them do not know.

3. You need different skills in different types of actuarial works.
Some may say the math used in actuarial works is not hard. But again I can tell you - Your concept of what an actuary does is very limited (even if you are a qualified actuary). Some actuarial works require highly fluent computer programming skills, some require extensive Math background, some require excellent communication skills, etc. My coworker worked on a project that required her solving correlation matrices and mathematical proofs, which I probably not able to do.

4. You work in insurance field directly or indirectly.
Some say you can go to banking industry with actuarial science knowledge. Let me tell you this. Most things you learn in your exams are insurance related. And after you spend years passing all the exams, you change to banking industry? This sounds ridiculously to me. It would only make sense for people stop taking exams, but we don't call these people actuaries. I do know some actuaries work outside of insurance industry, and do something that is completely non-actuarial, but that is rare. Most actuaries work in insurance field, either directly or indirectly. Directly means you are employed by the insurance companies, indirectly means you could be an insurer regulator, a consultant, etc. A lot of actuarial knowledge is highly specialized and not transferable to other fields. Even for actuaries in banking industry, they are most probably working on some insurance products offered by the banks, and so technically speaking, their works are still actuarial related.

This post has been edited by Igloo0000: Apr 7 2014, 08:31 AM
chfoong82
post Apr 12 2014, 03:34 PM

New Member
*
Newbie
1 posts

Joined: Apr 2014


Hi all, new to this site. I was previously resided in Australia and joined the IOA , passed 4 papers. Now I have relocated to Malaysia and considering of switching to SOA. Few things I need enlightenment on.

1) I am under impression that SOA is more recognisable Malaysia employers, is that true?
2) Are study material and exam fee for SOA much cheaper than IOA? I couldn't find any information on this, I am paying around AUD$240 per subject for study material and AUD$550 per exam.
3) What is structure of the exam? IOA exams are generally 3 hours long, all writing no multiple choice of course.
4) Hard to get exemptions for the exams I have done in IOA?
5) Lastly, SOA or IOA? I know this is bit vague but I am just trying pool some feedbacks.

Thanks!
Searingmage
post Apr 13 2014, 11:19 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,809 posts

Joined: Feb 2010


QUOTE(chfoong82 @ Apr 12 2014, 03:34 PM)
Hi all, new to this site. I was previously resided in Australia and joined the IOA , passed 4 papers. Now I have relocated to Malaysia and considering of switching to SOA. Few things I need enlightenment on.

1) I am under impression that SOA is more recognisable Malaysia employers, is that true?
2) Are study material and  exam fee for SOA much cheaper than IOA? I couldn't find any information on this, I am paying around AUD$240 per subject for study material and AUD$550 per exam.
3) What is structure of the exam? IOA exams are generally 3 hours long, all writing no multiple choice of course.
4) Hard to get exemptions for the exams I have done in IOA?
5) Lastly, SOA or IOA? I know this is bit vague but I am just trying pool some feedbacks.

Thanks!
*
Are you talking bout IOAA (Aus) or IOA (UK)?
Anyways, here's some answers:

1. Nope, they are generally equal footing (SOA, IOA and IOAA). But most ppl in Malaysia is under SoA
2. IOAA, then, maybe yes, SoA is cheaper (for exam fees, not sure bout material). IOA, no. SoA more expensive.
3. Check out http://www.soa.org/Education/Exam-Req/default.aspx
4. Not sure. Can't answer.
5. Depends really.. If you are planning to reside permanently in Malaysia, SoA and IoA is better (in general) than IOAA.

Note, when I say IOA it means UK (Institute and Faculty of Actuaries). If your IOA indicate Aus IOA, pls "adjust" and read my post of IOAA as your IOA.]

Hope this helps.
LightningFist
post May 6 2014, 03:43 AM

Minion of the Damned
Group Icon
VIP
3,965 posts

Joined: Apr 2009
QUOTE(Igloo0000 @ Apr 7 2014, 07:46 AM)
4.  You work in insurance field directly or indirectly.
Some say you can go to banking industry with actuarial science knowledge.  Let me tell you this.  Most things you learn in your exams are insurance related.  And after you spend years passing all the exams, you change to banking industry?  This sounds ridiculously to me.  It would only make sense for people stop taking exams, but we don't call these people actuaries.  I do know some actuaries work outside of insurance industry, and do something that is completely non-actuarial, but that is rare.  Most actuaries work in insurance field, either directly or indirectly.  Directly means you are employed by the insurance companies, indirectly means you could be an insurer regulator, a consultant, etc.  A lot of actuarial knowledge is highly specialized and not transferable to other fields.  Even for actuaries in banking industry, they are most probably working on some insurance products offered by the banks, and so technically speaking, their works are still actuarial related.
*
I'm not an actuary (respect) but what you say here doesn't seem fully correct based on what goes on in European, North American, Asian and Australian markets.

You are right in that most actuaries work in insurance ... that's where the need for them is because the finance side can be filled by non actuaries with accounting, risk, financial or investment backgrounds. But these is plenty of actuarial outside of insurance, in learning and in practice.

You talk about actuarial like actuarial maths = insurance maths. The latter may be true, but non-insurance can and often is 'actuarial'.


***


Out of the UK/Australia beginner exams, most are not focused on insurance (and don't even need to bring up the word insurance): Financial Maths (easily banking/finance), Financial Reporting (easily banking/accounting/finance), Probability & Math Stats (just normal Maths or Stats), Models (Stochastic Modelling and Survival Models can have 100% non-insurance applications), Econ (normal), Financial Economics (normal Finance and Quant Finance)

only 2 out of these 8 are explicitly insurance... Contingencies and Statistical Methods (or Risk Theory and Credibility Theory)

Half of the 6 SOA tracks do not have to be insurance related - CFE, QFI, and Retirement

Half of the available IFOA ST and SA exams do not have to be insurance related... ERM, Finance, Investment, Retirement

Half of the IAA Part 3 specialisations do not have to be insurance related... Finance/Investment and Retirement

So you see one can actually go through the entire system and still not have any advanced knowledge on insurance... the real specialised knowledge comes from choosing the life/general/health tracks, and working in the industry


***

There are many examples of people who have switched to the 'banking' industry (I mean the banking side not the insurance products side) after qualifying. Some of these are commercial banks. Some are investment banks. Many have wealth (funds) divisions. Many have quant (trading) roles. The IBs have corporate advisory and capital markets. The retail banks have savings products. They can touch insurance but they absolutely don't need to. The ones who work with credit risk, market risk, investment risk, funding risk, insolvency risk, interest rate risk, even ERM can still be actuaries (not just from the FSA/FIA/FIAA).

Actuaries can work in Capital Modelling (like you pointed out) which applies to all regulated retail banks or depository institutions, they don't need to sell insurance

Also as pointed out Asset Liability Management, Superannuation or Pensions, Asset Management, Corporate Finance, Trading/Structuring, even Marketing (Wealth or Funds) ... not insurance unless you make it

And non traditional stuff like Energy and Weather, if there is a financial risk, can be Actuarial

Besides, if you work on insurance products then you're in the insurance industry too whether it's a bank selling them or not
LightningFist
post May 6 2014, 04:09 AM

Minion of the Damned
Group Icon
VIP
3,965 posts

Joined: Apr 2009
QUOTE(tanxiaoming @ Feb 23 2014, 03:19 PM)
I hope there is someone still active for this post...
So I got offers for actuarial science degree for LSE(very high reputation uni), city university (cass) (one of the uni offer best act. science undergrad) and uni of waterloo ( said to be the uni offer the best act. science programme in nothern America)... I wanna get some suggestions... which uni should I go for...
*
LSE's reputation has slipped quite a lot in recent times

of course Asians worship LSE... you will have a good shot at interviews... losing only to or competing with Cambridge, Oxford, and Ivy League equivalent and those are friggin rare in Malaysia

basically in Europe and North America it'll still be one of the top schools for Economics. in actuarial it's nothing special (doesn't even have 8 exemptions) but it's closely related enough (some like to call actuarial an economic science) that it would be a pretty good school

that said, it's still one of the most prestigious schools you can go to that teaches a full Actuarial degree... it is the one uni that everybody everywhere knows, no matter what the ranking, 50 or 200

and you get to live in London

not sure if they still get a lot of world class guest speakers... but do not go in expecting to get world class teachers in all your classes, many Malaysians go to LSE or have graduated from there so you should be able to find out more

last thing i wanna say, don't be fooled by rankings. my school was a few years ago very highly ranked, but obviously without LSE or Ivy prestige. it could not possibly justify the international student fee, even with a better ranking, especially given how rich the school is (bad spending). ranking doesn't mean anything. repute is worth some.

sometimes the good schools with talent and that do cutting edge research in their specialist fields are not very reputable... eg City and Macquarie may be pioneers in Actuarial and have all the markers but they don't grab attention as the schools with all the sought after graduates
Igloo0000
post May 18 2014, 11:45 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
54 posts

Joined: Apr 2014
QUOTE(LightningFist @ May 5 2014, 03:43 PM)
I'm not an actuary (respect) but what you say here doesn't seem fully correct based on what goes on in European, North American, Asian and Australian markets.

You are right in that most actuaries work in insurance ... that's where the need for them is because the finance side can be filled by non actuaries with accounting, risk, financial or investment backgrounds. But these is plenty of actuarial outside of insurance, in learning and in practice.

You talk about actuarial like actuarial maths = insurance maths. The latter may be true, but non-insurance can and often is 'actuarial'.
*
I can tell you are not an actuary not because you said so, but because you define insurance very differently from an actuary. You define insurance narrowly in that your insurance understandings seem to focus only on the products, but product is just one of the many areas actuaries focus on. In fact many actuaries do not work on products but their works are still insurance related.

QUOTE(LightningFist @ May 5 2014, 03:43 PM)
Out of the UK/Australia beginner exams, most are not focused on insurance (and don't even need to bring up the word insurance): Financial Maths (easily banking/finance), Financial Reporting (easily banking/accounting/finance), Probability & Math Stats (just normal Maths or Stats), Models (Stochastic Modelling and Survival Models can have 100% non-insurance applications), Econ (normal), Financial Economics (normal Finance and Quant Finance)

only 2 out of these 8 are explicitly insurance... Contingencies and Statistical Methods (or Risk Theory and Credibility Theory)

Half of the 6 SOA tracks do not have to be insurance related - CFE, QFI, and Retirement

Half of the available IFOA ST and SA exams do not have to be insurance related... ERM, Finance, Investment, Retirement

Half of the IAA Part 3 specialisations do not have to be insurance related... Finance/Investment and Retirement

So you see one can actually go through the entire system and still not have any advanced knowledge on insurance... the real specialised knowledge comes from choosing the life/general/health tracks, and working in the industry
*
This depends on how you define “advance knowledge of insurance”. If you narrowly think insurance field solely as selling insurance products, then you are right. But I don’t think that way, and many actuaries don’t think that way. Understanding insurance is about understanding the entire life cycle’s cashflows of insurance products and all the risk involved. When an insurance policy is first offered, we experience underwriting and pricing risk. Some commercial policies could have credit risks. Some exposures are subject to cat risk. And when claims start to kick in, we need to estimate IBNR, which is when reserving risk comes in. Some long tail lines, such as professional liability has extreme long tail. And to manage these risks, we might need reinsurance. Every piece I mention here is about insurance.

You don’t need to explicitly mention the word “insurance” in the exams to relate them to insurance. I was once in the exam committee, responsible for drafting exams questions as well as grading the candidates’ papers. Some exams might not seem to be directly related to the narrow definition of insurance (or any specific insurance products), but in the real insurance world applications, they are. For instance you mention financial reporting. Pricing actuaries might not need to know a lot about financial reporting, but many other actuaries do. If I do not know the differences between GAAP, SAP and SII balance sheets, I wouldn’t be able to build a complete capital model. Don't just look at the names of the exams, focus on the exams materials and the exams questions. We put a lot of attentions on the insurance industry in the exams, even though the exams' names might look generic. There are a lot of things that are unique to insurance, for example the treatment of DAC in GAAP in SAP accounting. You don't need to know this if you are not in insurance.

These exams are designed primarily for insurance sector, and again I meant the broad definition of insurance, not just selling insurance policies. If you want to sell policies, you don’t need to take actuarial exams. If you want to do investment/trading, you don’t need to take actuarial exams. If you want to do corporate finance in banking or any other sectors, you do not need to take actuarial exams.

And by the way, actuaries involve heavily in ERM in the insurance industry because we understand risks in insurance field more than any other people. So actuaries working in ERM are still considered as working for insurance industry (refer to 4th point). My career is a good example here. I work in the corporate actuarial and therefore not involve in any specific insurance line. From corporate perspective, my work is part of the ERM process. And I have to admit my work is insurance related because at the end of the day I am employed directly by an insurance company. Don’t be narrow-minded to think that insurance related means you have to sell policies. No actuaries sell policies and I have never met an insurance agent before in where I work.

QUOTE(LightningFist @ May 5 2014, 03:43 PM)
There are many examples of people who have switched to the 'banking' industry (I mean the banking side not the insurance products side) after qualifying. Some of these are commercial banks. Some are investment banks. Many have wealth (funds) divisions. Many have quant (trading) roles. The IBs have corporate advisory and capital markets. The retail banks have savings products. They can touch insurance but they absolutely don't need to. The ones who work with credit risk, market risk, investment risk, funding risk, insolvency risk, interest rate risk, even ERM can still be actuaries (not just from the FSA/FIA/FIAA).

Actuaries can work in Capital Modelling (like you pointed out) which applies to all regulated retail banks or depository institutions, they don't need to sell insurance

Also as pointed out Asset Liability Management, Superannuation or Pensions, Asset Management, Corporate Finance, Trading/Structuring, even Marketing (Wealth or Funds) ... not insurance unless you make it

And non traditional stuff like Energy and Weather, if there is a financial risk, can be Actuarial

Besides, if you work on insurance products then you're in the insurance industry too whether it's a bank selling them or not
*
This aligns with my 2nd point - Actuarial field is more than what you think it is. I never say actuarial is about actuarial math. But let’s face it, actuarial is for insurance (not the narrow definition of insurance). There are some actuarial applications in the non-insurance field such as retirement as you said, but do you know in what rate this sector is shrinking? In the past many corporations used DB system to fund retirement, but with DC, actuaries are essentially not required.

You must have read some articles describing what actuaries do. Let me tell you this. Many of these articles are not 100% true. They tell you what sectors actuaries could involve in. But do they mention what is the proportion of actuaries working in non-insurance related sectors, such as banking, IB? I am only saying credentialed actuaries here because we do not consider those non-credentialed as actuaries. Come to one actuarial annual meeting in the US, and you will know what I meant. You can definitely find actuaries doing something non-insurance related, there is no doubt about that, but that is rare. My experience talking to people in the meetings is that at least 80-90% works in insurance field, either directly or indirectly, which can be either in pricing, reserving, modeling, ERM, reinsurance, etc. My specialization in the group is already considered rare but I still consider it insurance related.

It is uncommon that credentialed actuaries move from insurance sector to other sectors. Let me tell you why. Some of their skills can still be utilized in other sectors, but definitely not all of them. When they move out they have to compete with people with other backgrounds. Not that actuaries don't like competition, but if you are best at playing basketball, why do you want to give up playing basketball and play golf? Also actuaries have a very confine network. When you move to other sectors, you will end up disconnect in terms of what you're doing and what others are doing in the network. And we have all the valuable inter-connections in the network, why give up the connections? Even for me, my skills seem to be convertable to banking industry, but it is not that simple. In insurance our capital models main drivers are underwriting and reserving risks and we spend years understanding and parameterizing them. But in banking, interest rate and investment risks are more important (I think). So even as an expert in insurance capital models might be just average in banking, and vice versa. That would go back to the question - Why play golf when you are best at basketball.

ALM, corporate finance, trading and marketing are not common career paths for actuaries in the current real world. Pension is a little unique. There are quite some actuaries in this sector although it is not insurance related, but more and more Enrolled Actuaries “jump ship” to move out of pension. Energy and weather can be insurance related (refer to my 1st and 2nd points). We have a specialized cat modeling team under corporate actuarial that helps with weather perils, such as hurricane, wind storms. And cat modeling is a big topic in actuarial annual meetings.

This post has been edited by Igloo0000: May 18 2014, 01:10 PM
LightningFist
post May 18 2014, 01:45 PM

Minion of the Damned
Group Icon
VIP
3,965 posts

Joined: Apr 2009
You seem to be a bit confused! I never claimed actuaries were intimately linked to "selling insurance". One doesn't need to be a qualified actuary to understand the difference!

You may be right about the role of actuaries in some pension markets shrinking, and about DB vs DC. You're based in North America. In Australia superannuation has been growing (funds industry here is something like 3rd largest in the world, and indeed the capital market here is one of the top 5 in the world by size) and is projected to expand, and not only that, the compulsory rate for contributions will be increasing quite quickly as a result of legal changes. As an actuary you should know better than anyone that not everything you study in the exams is directly applicable to practice (for example, actuarial exams do not have all that much accounting in them but financial reporting is a large part of some actuaries' work). This is the case in retirement/superannuation, where actuarial expertise is valued, even if you certainly do not need to be an actuary to do the job.

Of course only a credentialed actuary (either associate or fully qualified) is an actuary - how could anyone confuse this?

You have a point, that some of the non-insurance exams can be intricately linked with insurance, ERM for insurers or hedging and ALM for insurers, and of course capital management is increasingly being linked back to the risk of insurance products if the institution sells those products. But you can damn well do the exams, and work in ALM or hedging and have nothing to do with insurance (unless you want to call all options and derivatives "insurance" when clearly they are not always the case).
SUSY.J.S
post May 18 2014, 09:44 PM

MLM
******
Senior Member
1,353 posts

Joined: Jan 2014
From: Sunway South Quay



QUOTE(monkeyseemonkeydo @ May 23 2009, 07:04 AM)
I believe that people are doing Actuarial Science for the wrong reasons. I hope that this post will actually shatter the disillusionment that people have. Don’t get me wrong, I am not trying to discourage people to pursue this challenging course, its challenge being its ultimate reward. However, it is disheartening to see so many people get into this course and ending up not being qualified actuaries, because they fail to understand what this course is all about.
First and foremost, my qualifications: I have wanted to do Actuarial Science since I was in Form 4. In college, I did my research and I have looked at the qualifications provided in the UK, US, Australia and Malaysia. I have now finished my final year in Actuarial Science in the UK. I have interned in an insurance company in Malaysia as well as in my current location. And I have been in your shoes before.

To get the ball rolling, here are some misconceptions that need to be cleared up:

1. I want to do Actuarial Science because I like Math.
This is the biggest misconception that people have about Actuarial Science. In actual fact, a good knowledge of Mathematics is necessary, but a great knowledge is not. In the UK, the first 8 professional papers are somewhat Maths-based, but the tougher papers at the end are all written papers, which require a good command of English, a good knowledge of the insurance industry and good critical thinking skills. Throughout my course, the most difficult branch of Maths we did was Calculus and Linear Algebra, and that is not saying much. When you do start working, you will realise that the only Math you need are mostly addition and subtraction. Computer Programming will be the most important skill you will ever need. And to all of those who says that they need Further Math in their A-Levels, I did Math, Economics and Law. If you like Math, do a Mathematics degree.

2. I want to do Actuarial Science because the pay is good.
True, we have one of the highest starting salaries in the business world. Not by much though. The thing is, a qualified actuary does earn a lot. But to get that qualification, one has to pass professional papers, and those are not easy by a mile. The average time it takes to pass all your papers in Malaysia is around 6 years, depending on how good you are. (Some do take more than 10 years) And truth be told, all other professions will be able to earn a satisfactory remuneration within 10 years. If you want the money, go into Investment Banking. In a magazine which I have read, in business, while all other financial workers are paying off their mortgage for their first house, Investment Bankers are buying their second home.

3. I can pass all my professional exams if I work hard enough.
I want to believe this. I really do want to believe this. But with only 50 qualified actuaries in Malaysia, doesn’t it make you doubt that the only reason people are failing is because of a lack of effort? Studying is easy enough. Working is easy enough. Studying while working is not. While I was working in Malaysia, a colleague of mine works from 9 to 7 everyday, if he is lucky. On his way to and back from work, he studies on the LRT. If there is overtime, he will need to stay back and continue working. On weekends, he studies. At night, after being thoroughly exhausted at work, he studies. And while doing all these, he needs to find time for his girlfriend, family and friends. Now, ask yourself this: can you picture yourself doing that for a year? 3 years? 10 years?

I am really glad I chose this course. I know I would spend half my time working staring in a computer at spreadsheets. I know it will be a hard few years in front of me. I also know that I want nothing more than to qualify as a professional actuary, as I do love what I do very much. But I wished I knew what I was in for before I made the decision. And I do hope that people who read this will have the ability to make an informed decision about the course that is Actuarial Science.
*
My mom knew a few qualified actuaries in Singapore that didn't even study for Actuarial Science during uni. Maths, Econ i guess that's more than enough to be an actuary.
Hell yeah! Investment banking! On ma way wink.gif
Oh and 1 more point, chicks love actuaries (if they know what is that) because Maths + Business = HOT wub.gif
QUOTE(cks2k2 @ May 23 2009, 09:56 AM)
I don't know anyone in the actuarial field, but I know ppl in investment banking and even though they make boat loads of money they work almost non-stop and have pretty much no social life. There was 1 fella in local Citibank: very high 5-figure salary, company car (BMW 5-series), company house (swanky penthouse) but work 6.5 days a week almost full day chasing US and local market. And most of them engage in risky behavior to de-stress (smoke, drink, sex etc).

So don't just make your career decision based on salary. It's a mistake most ppl (including myself) make.  sweat.gif
*
Investment bankers in western countries work 120 hours per week on average and their jobs are pretty pointless for those fresh grad that started to work as an analyst. Basically you're just doing what your Associates/VP works that they don't want to do.

This post has been edited by Y.J.S: May 18 2014, 09:45 PM
frodo baggin
post Jul 7 2014, 08:02 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
381 posts

Joined: Aug 2012
From: Shah Alam


It is not about Maths - that is true for all the careers out except for a Maths teacher or professor job.

So if you bank on your mathematical ability to pick a career - it is a misguided way of doing it.

Best way is to use your Bazi chart to figure out your elemental strengths and weakness before deciding on a lifelong journey to find out. At least the ancients knew what was better for them rather than using our school system to decide.


NovusInitium
post Aug 1 2014, 12:35 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
41 posts

Joined: Mar 2013
Hello everyone, I am writting the SOA exams externally and I'd like to seek clarifications on how someone in my position might gain exemptions for VEE.

I've used the search function and all I got was posts about attaining a certain grade in certain subjects to get exemptions. However, those are posts by those opting to enroll for an actuarial degree or are already in one.

http://actuaries.org.my/career/route-to-be...an-actuary-soa/

This post has been edited by NovusInitium: Aug 1 2014, 12:37 PM
LightningFist
post Aug 1 2014, 09:06 PM

Minion of the Damned
Group Icon
VIP
3,965 posts

Joined: Apr 2009
QUOTE(frodo baggin @ Jul 7 2014, 08:02 PM)
It is not about Maths - that is true for all the careers out except for a Maths teacher or professor job.
*
This is true for most actuaries you would meet, especially in Malaysia. A lot of actuaries are life actuaries, and while they do use some Maths (financial mathematics to work out the values of future cash flows, survival models to model mortality or lapses, "Maths" to count ages of policyholders etc) it is nothing like the Maths that rocket scientists or astrophysicists use.

But if you are one of the few actuaries that prices derivatives, or models catastrophe risk using quantitative methods, or fits distributions to claims data, you might use a bit more difficult Maths
Searingmage
post Aug 3 2014, 09:46 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,809 posts

Joined: Feb 2010


QUOTE(NovusInitium @ Aug 1 2014, 12:35 PM)
Hello everyone, I am writting the SOA exams externally and I'd like to seek clarifications on how someone in my position might gain exemptions for VEE.

I've used the search function and all I got was posts about attaining a certain grade in certain subjects to get exemptions. However, those are posts by those opting to enroll for an actuarial degree or are already in one.

http://actuaries.org.my/career/route-to-be...an-actuary-soa/
*
You'll need to take the course separately unless you're in a university which SOA recognizes and provides exemption on the VEEs
Michael_Light
post Aug 7 2014, 08:44 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
473 posts

Joined: Dec 2010
From: Kuala Lumpur


I wonder is it a tradition for students to pass 4 ~ 5 papers before even graduating now a day. I have 2 seniors that passed 5 papers (Exam P,FM, MLC, MFE and C) within 3 years of undergraduate study, and a few that passed roughly 3 papers in 2 years. I am referring to UCSI university. I am curious about the actuarial development progress of local students from UM, UKM and UTAR. How many papers do we need to pass upon graduation to stay competitive? hmm.gif Please share some information if you are/were an actuarial science student. drool.gif
LightningFist
post Aug 7 2014, 10:39 PM

Minion of the Damned
Group Icon
VIP
3,965 posts

Joined: Apr 2009
QUOTE(Michael_Light @ Aug 7 2014, 08:44 PM)
I wonder is it a tradition for students to pass 4 ~ 5 papers before even graduating now a day. I have 2 seniors that passed 5 papers (Exam P,FM, MLC, MFE and C) within 3 years of undergraduate study, and a few that passed roughly 3 papers in 2 years. I am referring to UCSI university. I am curious about the actuarial development progress of local students from UM, UKM and UTAR. How many papers do we need to pass upon graduation to stay competitive?  hmm.gif  Please share some information if you are/were an actuarial science student.  drool.gif
*
Off topic a bit.

Malaysia is very competitive because of the huge supply of graduates mainly from Malaysia, UK, USA, Australia, relative to the number and variety of positions available. You can contrast Malaysia to other countries... Australia's General Insurance industry is as big as its Life industry in terms of the number of actuaries, while it has one of the world's largest pension fund pools, and a vibrant Retirement & Employee Benefits industry. The UK is similar... other than GI and pensions, both markets also employ actuaries in areas like solvency and capital management, asset liability management, finance and investment, risk management etc. In Malaysia, some actuaries work in General but I think most are in Life... and they do pricing, valuation, reinsurance, marketing, product development, that's mainly it - there's little specialisation in or separation into capital, risk, or investment.

But I would say connections and luck are more important. It's not usually the case that the person with the most exams passed and the highest uni grades gets the job. Even overseas, it is like this... new hires, even graduates, come from a variety of backgrounds (in terms of work experience) and differ in number of exams passed. What they have in common is maybe only an Actuarial degree.

It's not 'tradition' or a must. But you should know very well that exams are important even if they do not come before work. I don't think 4 exams before graduating is a lot - true, they are external so they may be very time consuming, but they are multiple choice (some) and intended to be preliminary, and supported by your tertiary education. Those university exemptions (outside SOA or CAS) are not easy to get either, as the schools are free to set much harder exams.
BenMO
post Aug 25 2014, 07:57 AM

New Member
*
Newbie
4 posts

Joined: Aug 2014


I am a mature student currently going to school in Canada. I have two program choices to choose from and they are undergraduate Actuarial Mathematics program and undergraduate Civil Engineering program. I have been accepted to both programs and have to choose one of them by the end of August. I love pure math and my GPA has been excellent so far.
I hold a previous mechanical engineering degree from overseas which is not in demand very much in North America and that is why I am back to school again. I have heard that entry level actuaries would have better job opportunities in comparison with entry level civil engineers. Do you think this is true? what is the current job market like for entry level actuaries?
I understand that in order to become an entry level actuary one must study very hard for at least four yours. Beside all personal preferences and circumstances, there are other things to consider, including employment outlooks, potential income opportunities, jobs available etc that are equally or even more important. Considering all these, I would like to seek your advice and opinions and know what your thoughts are about these two educational choices. Thank you for your time.

This post has been edited by BenMO: Aug 25 2014, 08:03 AM
Critical_Fallacy
post Aug 25 2014, 02:21 PM

∫nnộvisεr
Group Icon
VIP
3,713 posts

Joined: Nov 2011
From: Torino
QUOTE(BenMO @ Aug 25 2014, 07:57 AM)
I am a mature student currently going to school in Canada. I have two program choices to choose from and they are undergraduate Actuarial Mathematics program and undergraduate Civil Engineering program. I have been accepted to both programs and have to choose one of them by the end of August. I love pure math and my GPA has been excellent so far.

I hold a previous mechanical engineering degree from overseas which is not in demand very much in North America and that is why I am back to school again. I have heard that entry level actuaries would have better job opportunities in comparison with entry level civil engineers. Do you think this is true? what is the current job market like for entry level actuaries?

I understand that in order to become an entry level actuary one must study very hard for at least four yours. Beside all personal preferences and circumstances,  there are other things to consider, including employment outlooks, potential income opportunities, jobs available etc that are equally or even more important.  Considering all these, I would like to seek your advice and opinions and know what your thoughts are about these two educational choices.

Thank you for your time.
To you, it seems that Job Security takes priority over any other matter. However, I'd like to explore your perspectives on Mathematics before commenting. Think about the maths you’ve done so far. icon_idea.gif

(1) What do you think Mathematics is?

(2) Why is Mathematics important? (What’s this good for?)

(3) How do students go about learning Mathematics more effectively?

(4) What is the contribution of Mathematics to your professional working life?
LightningFist
post Aug 25 2014, 07:46 PM

Minion of the Damned
Group Icon
VIP
3,965 posts

Joined: Apr 2009
QUOTE(BenMO @ Aug 25 2014, 07:57 AM)
I am a mature student currently going to school in Canada. I have two program choices to choose from and they are undergraduate Actuarial Mathematics program and undergraduate Civil Engineering program. I have been accepted to both programs and have to choose one of them by the end of August. I love pure math and my GPA has been excellent so far.
I hold a previous mechanical engineering degree from overseas which is not in demand very much in North America and that is why I am back to school again. I have heard that entry level actuaries would have better job opportunities in comparison with entry level civil engineers. Do you think this is true? what is the current job market like for entry level actuaries?
I understand that in order to become an entry level actuary one must study very hard for at least four yours. Beside all personal preferences and circumstances,  there are other things to consider, including employment outlooks, potential income opportunities, jobs available etc that are equally or even more important.  Considering all these, I would like to seek your advice and opinions and know what your thoughts are about these two educational choices. Thank you for your time.
*
I find it incredible that you are asking these questions given you already have an engineering degree. You would know more about engineering and at least have a far better idea of civil eng than most lay people.

I'm going to make an educated guess and say civil engineers have an easier time looking for work than student actuaries. Actuaries add value to financial services and risk management, and sometimes statistical modelling, but nothing quite as solid as buildings and the environment. I'm sure there are more engineers than student actuaries in each graduating class, but very few people want to employ actuaries for their specific skillset or training. It is a lot easier to replace actuaries than engineers, and you don't need as many. The conversation will forever evolve around what actuaries or students can do outside of insurance, pensions, finance, and risk. Well, they may be smart or good with numbers and technical stuff, but who the hell knows what actuarial science is?

The market for entry level student actuaries is pretty bad everywhere you go. This is because schools and courses have bloomed in the past couple decades and supply far exceeds demand. It also takes very long for most people to pass the exams so they stay at analyst level quite some time (meaning an even bigger oversupply). Most people (at the entry level) find jobs via luck or connections (though most would hold the qualifications to merit the job).
Searingmage
post Aug 25 2014, 09:43 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,809 posts

Joined: Feb 2010


QUOTE(Michael_Light @ Aug 7 2014, 08:44 PM)
I wonder is it a tradition for students to pass 4 ~ 5 papers before even graduating now a day. I have 2 seniors that passed 5 papers (Exam P,FM, MLC, MFE and C) within 3 years of undergraduate study, and a few that passed roughly 3 papers in 2 years. I am referring to UCSI university. I am curious about the actuarial development progress of local students from UM, UKM and UTAR. How many papers do we need to pass upon graduation to stay competitive?  hmm.gif  Please share some information if you are/were an actuarial science student.  drool.gif
*
I would say at least 3 papers are necessary for you to get a job..
Though, at the end of the day, I think attitude is more important. If you can show that you are hardworking and willing to learn, you'll have a higher chance of getting a job.
The reason I said 3 papers is because it would be quite difficult for you to get an interview with anything less. After obtaining an interview, attitude comes before results (at least in my opinion)
BenMO
post Aug 29 2014, 01:20 AM

New Member
*
Newbie
4 posts

Joined: Aug 2014


QUOTE(LightningFist @ Aug 25 2014, 07:46 AM)
I find it incredible that you are asking these questions given you already have an engineering degree. You would know more about engineering and at least have a far better idea of civil eng than most lay people.

I'm going to make an educated guess and say civil engineers have an easier time looking for work than student actuaries. Actuaries add value to financial services and risk management, and sometimes statistical modelling, but nothing quite as solid as buildings and the environment. I'm sure there are more engineers than student actuaries in each graduating class, but very few people want to employ actuaries for their specific skillset or training. It is a lot easier to replace actuaries than engineers, and you don't need as many. The conversation will forever evolve around what actuaries or students can do outside of insurance, pensions, finance, and risk. Well, they may be smart or good with numbers and technical stuff, but who the hell knows what actuarial science is?

The market for entry level student actuaries is pretty bad everywhere you go. This is because schools and courses have bloomed in the past couple decades and supply far exceeds demand. It also takes very long for most people to pass the exams so they stay at analyst level quite some time (meaning an even bigger oversupply). Most people (at the entry level) find jobs via luck or connections (though most would hold the qualifications to merit the job).
*
Thank you so much for your advice. Actually, I thought the same, engineering has a broader job market. The number of engineers in each specific fields, for instance civil or electrical, is almost 10 times as many as actuaries.
BenMO
post Aug 29 2014, 01:28 AM

New Member
*
Newbie
4 posts

Joined: Aug 2014


QUOTE(Critical_Fallacy @ Aug 25 2014, 02:21 AM)
To you, it seems that Job Security takes priority over any other matter. However, I'd like to explore your perspectives on Mathematics before commenting. Think about the maths you’ve done so far. icon_idea.gif

(1) What do you think Mathematics is?

(2) Why is Mathematics important? (What’s this good for?)

(3) How do students go about learning Mathematics more effectively?

(4) What is the contribution of Mathematics to your professional working life?
*
Thanks for your comments. I love math. I always scored excellent in math.
Critical_Fallacy
post Aug 29 2014, 02:00 AM

∫nnộvisεr
Group Icon
VIP
3,713 posts

Joined: Nov 2011
From: Torino
QUOTE(BenMO @ Aug 29 2014, 01:28 AM)
Thanks for your comments. I love math. I always scored excellent in math.
Is it really difficult to get Mechanical Engineering jobs in America? As far as I know, STEM graduates (Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics) are among the most sought after. If you are looking for jobs, find someone who’s working in your field and get to know them. Having a contact already at the firm is always better than cold-calling through the job boards.

Actuaries are required to have an understanding of the mathematical structure underlying insurance and financial security systems, and thus must have a strong background in discrete mathematics, applied statistics and business. Are you ready? icon_idea.gif
BenMO
post Sep 1 2014, 09:25 PM

New Member
*
Newbie
4 posts

Joined: Aug 2014


QUOTE(Critical_Fallacy @ Aug 28 2014, 02:00 PM)
Is it really difficult to get Mechanical Engineering jobs in America? As far as I know, STEM graduates (Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics) are among the most sought after. If you are looking for jobs, find someone who’s working in your field and get to know them. Having a contact already at the firm is always better than cold-calling through the job boards.

Actuaries are required to have an understanding of the mathematical structure underlying insurance and financial security systems, and thus must have a strong background in discrete mathematics, applied statistics and business. Are you ready? icon_idea.gif
*
My areas of interest are calculus, geometry, trigonometry and to some degree linear algebra. To be honest, I'm not hundred percent sure about statistics and probability which actuarial math is mostly all about. Besides, I am not sure about the business and finance sides of it either. I took two econ courses this summer; although I managed to pass them with excellent marks, I did not like them at all. This have made me to think even more if actuarial math would be a good choice for me. In addition to all these, the job market is not as broad as the engineering job market. Am I right? rclxub.gif
tkhin
post Sep 4 2014, 12:37 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
120 posts

Joined: Mar 2006



since your in canada, see if your uni has programs in financial engineering/quantitative finance?

ie developing pricing models for derivatives etc..

If you are interested in modeling , an actuarial degree does not really prepare you for real modeling work...

Example of standard literature:
"Managing Smile Risk" by Hagan et. al.

If this literature piques your interest ie understanding and then implementing it in a Object oriented language of your choice ie C++, then actuarial science is not enough..






LightningFist
post Oct 29 2014, 06:45 PM

Minion of the Damned
Group Icon
VIP
3,965 posts

Joined: Apr 2009
QUOTE(BenMO @ Sep 1 2014, 09:25 PM)
My areas of interest are calculus, geometry, trigonometry and to some degree linear algebra. To be honest, I'm not hundred percent sure about statistics and probability which actuarial math is mostly all about. Besides, I am not sure about the business and finance sides of it either. I took two econ courses this summer; although I managed to pass them with excellent marks, I did not like them at all. This have made me to think even more if actuarial math would be a good choice for me. In addition to all these, the job market is not as broad as the engineering job market. Am I right? rclxub.gif
*
a lot of actuaries are terrible at Maths (also see comment below). even actuaries will acknowledge that PDEs and SDEs are not natural to their thinking, rather that is the domain of physicists and mathematicians.

majority of actuaries will never use geometry, trigonometry, linear algebra in practice. there are exceptions to this. those who do investment modelling (rare) might use some matrix algebra in optimisation. some will do curve fitting in life insurance (survival models) and this would entail some heavy calculus. those in reinsurance (especially general reinsurance) might do heavy modelling, which means difficult equations and statistical software, and maybe stochastic models. but it must be stressed that most actuaries you will ever meet never come close to touching these, because insurance belongs to financial services, it is a business discipline. actuaries need formula to model reserves, liabilities, and to price risk, but for business reasons it cannot be the most complicated version every time. even the actual probability and stats used in practice is often simplified (how many actuaries use stochastic models which aren't automated or pre-programmed, and how much of the mathematical techniques learnt in school is ever used).

actuaries (in traditional practice) look at cashflows. then they consider factors which affect the size and timing and probability of occurence of the cashflows. you have some modern trends which are derivatives, energy, enterprise risk management, which are a bit different.

QUOTE(tkhin @ Sep 4 2014, 12:37 AM)
since your in canada, see if your uni has programs in financial engineering/quantitative finance?

ie developing pricing models for derivatives etc..

If you are interested in modeling , an actuarial degree does not really prepare you for real modeling work...

Example of standard literature:
"Managing Smile Risk" by Hagan et. al.

If this literature  piques your interest ie understanding and then implementing it in a Object oriented language of your choice ie C++, then actuarial science is not enough..
*
true that. majority of actuaries are not mathematicians, and most aren't even statisticians (don't count the lecturers and academics with their MScs and PhDs). some actuaries work as quants, i'm not completely sure how they managed to do it, i'm assuming they were very smart to begin with. there are some people who start with a Bachelor's in Act Sci and move on to an MQF or Comp Finance graduate degree.
LightningFist
post Oct 29 2014, 06:46 PM

Minion of the Damned
Group Icon
VIP
3,965 posts

Joined: Apr 2009
someone asked me this so i'll answer here

QUOTE
Asking your opinion, if during my degree,I take CFA to increase my employability in the finance industry after graduation, is this advisable? Now, I'm kind of changing my direction as I found what I like is just $$ and also figures, so deciding to venture into finance industry.


actuarial is also $$ and figures. anyway, i wouldnt advise anyone to take CFA unless they had compelling reasons. I know a lot of people who understand what the CFA is about (and I think I do), but I still wouldnt recommend them to take it. In your case i think you have no idea of what the CFA truly is which is why it would be worse for you to do it

that said, the industry can be very superficial. what do i mean? let's say there's an oxford engineering grad or lse management grad. they might get interviews and even get the job, with some luck, without being the best fit or even genuinely interested in finance for what it is (outside of money). this totally depends on the interviewer and how good they are at assessing fit and aptitude, and to an extent how much they care about what type of talent they hire. they might not even know that much about finance (not really a big deal tho). their main edge was brand name. same for CFA, it might be a false signal which can help you land interviews, even though a large chunk of the finance industry (if you extend this to all financial markets activity, including banking) wont care about it much.

in actuarial, no one really cares what school you went to. can be Curtin, or some Asian uni. we even know (we being actuarial students and actuaries) that most of what you learnt in school never gets used (other than say Contingencies which is the core of life insurance, or Financial Maths which is the core of anything to do with actuaries, plus other specific examples) but we still like actuarial graduates because they tend to have been tested hard while at school with some very silly exams. also compared to a Maths or Econ grad they would be further ahead with their exams, which is advantageous for consultants, and also beneficial for direct companies because less resources are spent on education and study
wallacetan
post Oct 30 2014, 06:56 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
55 posts

Joined: Apr 2014
Im not sorry and I have to say this.
Actuarial Science is not your field even if you are very bright.
It's for the one that truly understands and appreciates the existence of this profession.
Unless you have been through in either insurance industry, accounting industry and financial industry.
I would just want to ask, how much do you know about actuarial studies?
No idea? Ok please don't ever think about it.

Just for your information, I have been thinking to take a degree in actuarial science for 6 years back in junior 3(form 3) (oh my god, how pro I can be when Im finally an actuary??!) but ended up in an accounting and finance degree, for which later on I will definitely take CFA professional exams.

Whoever choosing between actuarial science and finance, please make sure that you are well aware of what they are doing in that industry.

Be prepared for the hardship that is coming to you, whether you choose any of them. You are going to suffer not only for the time during the studies but also after that.

I have realised that a lot of people are now going into financial studies for which they think they can 'handle it'. Good for them to regret one day.

Let's just hope that you can mentally believe in it before you physically start it.

Don't listen to people that only talks about salaries. It's totally bullshit. End of story.
LightningFist
post Oct 30 2014, 10:10 PM

Minion of the Damned
Group Icon
VIP
3,965 posts

Joined: Apr 2009
QUOTE(wallacetan @ Oct 30 2014, 06:56 PM)
Don't listen to people that only talks about salaries. It's totally bullshit. End of story.
*
since we're not only talking about actuaries, but finance more broadly, this is relevant.

this is a sticky point. there are some people who come from actuarial backgrounds (studied actuarial science, even worked for insurance companies) that are making loads of bank... I'm talking retire rich at 30-40. Think hedge funds, prop traders, investment bankers, some partners in consulting firms, certain brokers. they may not all work as actuaries but they all started from that same place. it is due to the uniqueness of their business, and the fact they make money off commissions and fees rather than products. to make money off products you need to be exceptional (Apple iPhone) but commissions are easy when the service you provide is not easily replaceable.

which brings us to insurance. sounds very much like investment banking, prop trading, hedge funds. the operators must bear huge financial risk (although this is of course mitigated or limited by reinsurance and derivatives). the ability to supply capital is not their value driver or business model, because any rich investor or cash rich company can play that role - even a government or pension fund. it is their appetite for risk which is their main source of value. so why aren't insurance actuaries all rich, if insurance companies can generate so much economic value in theory...? many reasons. structurally the industry relies heavily on financial advisers who take huge cuts, leaving little for the rest. insurance companies face huge capital requirements so they are usually public owned (listed) or a subsidiary of a listed company - at least the major ones are these days. which means the company works to produce returns for shareholders, whereas in a small advisory practice or fund the workers are also owners and they can keep a lot more money. insurance also has a deeper purpose, and that is to pay claims so that people can get on with their lives and businesses can survive hazardous events, even as a for-profit company (hedge funds, traders etc exist only to make money for themselves or their customers, and take a fee in the process, although those who have a role as investors do facilitate the financial markets)
betawatcher
post Nov 6 2014, 01:47 AM

New Member
*
Newbie
10 posts

Joined: Dec 2012


Just graduated from UKM with Actuarial Science degree and honestly, I wish I studied WAY harder for the professional exams. I only managed to pass 2 before I graduated and I'm worried that I won't have as much time to study once I find work. I just know that the 4 Dean's List students that passed 4/5 exams instantly got work in Actuarial department after graduation. As someone said above, these exams are important for employers to even LOOK at your resume. Right now, my alternative is banking but I wish I could penetrate insurance industry somehow... Guess I'll have to keep studying. sad.gif

I don't regret getting into Actuarial Science (I don't have excellent results but I love this field of maths and how you have to use these numbers to make decisions in economy, explain in layman's terms and stuff) but I just wish people would stop hyping this course as "SURE HIGH PAY, SURE GET JOB ONE"! But there are definitely possibilities for actuarial students if they can't get into actuarial department. I heard that since actuarial students are known for being smart (high requirements to get into degree and stuff), you can also try investment or banking or risk management.
ZeonKid
post Nov 6 2014, 07:23 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
48 posts

Joined: Dec 2013

Allow me to estimate how many local actuarial graduates we have every years
UM : 40
UKM : 40
UTAR : 120
UCSI : 50
UITM : 50
USIM : 50
Total : 350

at least 350 local actuarial graduates for this year and this number is increasing every year! More local uni are offering actuarial science courses, e.g. Sunway, and I heard there is like over 50+ student in the latest batch. I think that more local uni like MMU taylor going to start offering this course in the near future (since more actuarial graduates = more actuarial lecturers available in the future!).

if you ask people in oversea uni which offer actuarial course (eg Southampton/Drake/Waterloo/Cass), they would say most of the Malaysians there study Actuarial Sciences. If you tell random aunty/uncles that you studying actuarial science, their response would be "OH my nephew/niece/relative also studies that in XXX country, you guys are going to be RICH!". So add another 300 oversea actuarial grads to my figure above (sorry im not familiar with oversea uni, so just make a rough estimate), which would sum up to at least 650 actuarial grads.

According to BNM, we have roughly 50 insurance companies (life/general conventional, life/general takaful, general/life reinsurance, general/life retakaful) and about 5 consulting companies offering actuarial services. Assuming each company takes 2~3 fresh graduates each year, 2.5*55 = 137.5 fresh actuarial openings each year, which is actually MUCH HIGHER than the actual number, 137.5/650 = 21%, at most 21% of actuarial graduates can get an actuarial job, while most of the rest end up in banks or non-actuarial positions in insurance companies.

Feel free to correct my estimates above if you have better/more credible figure.

So it would be fair to say at most 1 out of 5 graduates can get actuarial job, which is certainly not an easy task! For my batch in UKM, only 8 out of 45 students get actuarial job, roughly 18%. I believe the percentage would be much lower for private uni as they take a lot of students.

So, think again before you take actuarial sciences, dont believe whatever BS said in the media/newspaper - "actuarial fresh graduate are highly demanded blah blah blah". that maybe happen in developed country like US but certainly not in Malaysia.

I think we should do a survey to see how many percentage of students can actually get into actuarial field for each uni tongue.gif
ZeonKid
post Nov 6 2014, 07:27 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
48 posts

Joined: Dec 2013
QUOTE(betawatcher @ Nov 6 2014, 01:47 AM)
Just graduated from UKM with Actuarial Science degree and honestly, I wish I studied WAY harder for the professional exams. I only managed to pass 2 before I graduated and I'm worried that I won't have as much time to study once I find work. I just know that the 4 Dean's List students that passed 4/5 exams instantly got work in Actuarial department after graduation. As someone said above, these exams are important for employers to even LOOK at your resume. Right now, my alternative is banking but I wish I could penetrate insurance industry somehow... Guess I'll have to keep studying. sad.gif

I don't regret getting into Actuarial Science (I don't have excellent results but I love this field of maths and how you have to use these numbers to make decisions in economy, explain in layman's terms and stuff) but I just wish people would stop hyping this course as "SURE HIGH PAY, SURE GET JOB ONE"! But there are definitely possibilities for actuarial students if they can't get into actuarial department. I heard that since actuarial students are known for being smart (high requirements to get into degree and stuff), you can also try investment or banking or risk management.
*
I know two of your friends that you mentioned above tongue.gif may i know in which industry are you working now?

LightningFist
post Nov 7 2014, 11:46 AM

Minion of the Damned
Group Icon
VIP
3,965 posts

Joined: Apr 2009
QUOTE(ZeonKid @ Nov 6 2014, 07:23 PM)
Allow me to estimate how many local actuarial graduates we have every years
UM : 40
UKM : 40
UTAR : 120
UCSI : 50
UITM : 50
USIM : 50
Total : 350

at least 350 local actuarial graduates for this year and this number is increasing every year! More local uni are offering actuarial science courses, e.g. Sunway, and I heard there is like over 50+ student in the latest batch. I think that more local uni like MMU taylor going to start offering this course in the near future (since more actuarial graduates = more actuarial lecturers available in the future!).

if you ask people in oversea uni which offer actuarial course (eg Southampton/Drake/Waterloo/Cass), they would say most of the Malaysians there study Actuarial Sciences. If you tell random aunty/uncles that you studying actuarial science, their response would be "OH my nephew/niece/relative also studies that in XXX country, you guys are going to be RICH!". So add another 300 oversea actuarial grads to my figure above (sorry im not familiar with oversea uni, so just make a rough estimate), which would sum up to at least 650 actuarial grads.

According to BNM, we have roughly 50 insurance companies (life/general conventional, life/general takaful, general/life reinsurance, general/life retakaful) and about 5 consulting companies offering actuarial services. Assuming each company takes 2~3 fresh graduates each year, 2.5*55 = 137.5 fresh actuarial openings each year, which is actually MUCH HIGHER than the actual number, 137.5/650 = 21%, at most 21% of actuarial graduates can get an actuarial job, while most of the rest end up in banks or non-actuarial positions in insurance companies. 

Feel free to correct my estimates above if you have better/more credible figure.

So it would be fair to say at most 1 out of 5 graduates can get actuarial job, which is certainly not an easy task! For my batch in UKM, only 8 out of 45 students get actuarial job, roughly 18%. I believe the percentage would be much lower for private uni as they take a lot of students.

So, think again before you take actuarial sciences, dont believe whatever BS said in the media/newspaper - "actuarial fresh graduate are highly demanded blah blah blah".  that maybe happen in developed country like US but certainly not in Malaysia.

I think we should do a survey to see how many percentage of students can actually get into actuarial field for each uni tongue.gif
*
I wouldn't know how many graduates are produced locally, but don't assume all those who start out as students in first year will graduate in actuarial science - a number will drop out.

As for the 20% odds, this is generous I think. You're overestimating the number of companies that hire Actuarial Students (i.e. Analysts). For example, some reinsurers are small branches of larger regional hubs (in Singapore or Hong Kong) and these guys generally do not need recent graduates, so 2-3 per year is unrealistic. Now there are about 7 reinsurers I can think of that operate in Malaysia but if you understand the nature of their business you'll know they don't often want or need grads. I'd say two or three that are big enough to want a couple of grads every year or two. The pure brokers are even more extreme, because they are even smaller branches with even less staff - no room for graduates except once every few years (and they actually don't really need Actuarial Students anyway).

You're right that there are about 4-5 prominent consulting firms that provide actuarial services but only two of them are big and active, the rest don't really need graduates except once in a while. Now of the direct companies I can count below 20 prominent companies in life and/or general and takaful, with about half that have life and general (there are a few more very small companies that have very little presence). In my experience only very large life companies will need 2-3 recent graduate Actuarial Students per year, and this is if they are being aggressive. So the top 5-10 life companies may want 2.5 grads per year, general even less so maybe 1 per year for the top 5. This makes sense too, if a life actuarial dept has only 20 staff then about 10% taken in as grads is realistic, if a little optimistic for the smaller companies.

My count is 25 (life) + 5 (general) + 5 (reinsurance) + 5 (consulting) = 40 positions for graduates.

If you want to estimate the number of people competing for these few positions, do not just count those who leave school. There are plenty of people who graduated in actuarial science in previous years, and are looking for these jobs too (whether or not they have found a job elsewhere). They could be holding out for actuarial jobs for a year, they could be working for a year or more and be hunting for actuarial jobs for several years.

6 schools in Australia teach Actuarial Science. There are 20 or more combined in the UK and Ireland. In America I don't even want to count (because exams are external, in theory you could do any major from Maths, Business, Econ, Finance, Stats, Comp Sci, even if there is no formal Actuarial major), let's say 60. Then you have a few from Hong Kong, Singapore but I won't count these. Let's say you have 10 Malaysian actuarial graduates from each school and half come back to compete for these jobs, that's well over 400 people.
ZeonKid
post Nov 7 2014, 03:06 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
48 posts

Joined: Dec 2013
QUOTE(LightningFist @ Nov 7 2014, 11:46 AM)
I wouldn't know how many graduates are produced locally, but don't assume all those who start out as students in first year will graduate in actuarial science - a number will drop out.

As for the 20% odds, this is generous I think. You're overestimating the number of companies that hire Actuarial Students (i.e. Analysts). For example, some reinsurers are small branches of larger regional hubs (in Singapore or Hong Kong) and these guys generally do not need recent graduates, so 2-3 per year is unrealistic. Now there are about 7 reinsurers I can think of that operate in Malaysia but if you understand the nature of their business you'll know they don't often want or need grads. I'd say two or three that are big enough to want a couple of grads every year or two. The pure brokers are even more extreme, because they are even smaller branches with even less staff - no room for graduates except once every few years (and they actually don't really need Actuarial Students anyway).

You're right that there are about 4-5 prominent consulting firms that provide actuarial services but only two of them are big and active, the rest don't really need graduates except once in a while. Now of the direct companies I can count below 20 prominent companies in life and/or general and takaful, with about half that have life and general (there are a few more very small companies that have very little presence). In my experience only very large life companies will need 2-3 recent graduate Actuarial Students per year, and this is if they are being aggressive. So the top 5-10 life companies may want 2.5 grads per year, general even less so maybe 1 per year for the top 5. This makes sense too, if a life actuarial dept has only 20 staff then about 10% taken in as grads is realistic, if a little optimistic for the smaller companies.

My count is 25 (life) + 5 (general) + 5 (reinsurance) + 5 (consulting) = 40 positions for graduates.

If you want to estimate the number of people competing for these few positions, do not just count those who leave school. There are plenty of people who graduated in actuarial science in previous years, and are looking for these jobs too (whether or not they have found a job elsewhere). They could be holding out for actuarial jobs for a year, they could be working for a year or more and be hunting for actuarial jobs for several years.

6 schools in Australia teach Actuarial Science. There are 20 or more combined in the UK and Ireland. In America I don't even want to count (because exams are external, in theory you could do any major from Maths, Business, Econ, Finance, Stats, Comp Sci, even if there is no formal Actuarial major), let's say 60. Then you have a few from Hong Kong, Singapore but I won't count these. Let's say you have 10 Malaysian actuarial graduates from each school and half come back to compete for these jobs, that's well over 400 people.
*
Yea, I admit that my 20% odd is very optimistic, since I underestimated the number of actuarial grad in local uni, and overestimated the actuarial job openings in the market.

lets just say your estimation is pessimistic, which your estimate is 40 jobs available / (400 oversea grads + 400 local grad) = 5%.
So we can conclude that the percentage of actuarial student actually able to land an actuarial job is around 5%~20%. And we know that the 20% odds is actually very unrealistic sweat.gif

can i know how many person in your batch work in actuarial field?

This post has been edited by ZeonKid: Nov 7 2014, 03:07 PM
conankun
post Nov 7 2014, 03:27 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
88 posts

Joined: Dec 2012


Currently studying AS in um, Third year.

Going to take my third papers but still completely undecided for my future career pathway =3

We do have around 30-35 batchmates per year before this year intake. For year 2014, we have 40 plus juniors. Hope this info help the estimation haha. One more important information is we have largely malay batchmates which more into Takaful or islamic finance side, if you exclude that part of market. However, we still left with around 10-15 who is eagerly to enter actuarial field.

*Numbers stated is for each year and UM providing four year course*
LightningFist
post Nov 7 2014, 06:01 PM

Minion of the Damned
Group Icon
VIP
3,965 posts

Joined: Apr 2009
QUOTE(ZeonKid @ Nov 7 2014, 03:06 PM)
can i know how many person in your batch work in actuarial field?
*
can't really answer this because we didn't really have a 'batch' at uni, and I wouldn't know everybody

e.g. if you start on the same day as me but study two degrees you could be my classmate but i graduate earlier than you, so you're not my graduating batch even though we started together

when i graduated there were 9 or 10 people in total, even though my school probably produces 50-100 actuarial graduates per year.

it would be easier to estimate how many vacancies there were or hires made, and therefore how many graduates got into the actuarial field
PoPoBear
post Nov 8 2014, 11:58 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
418 posts

Joined: Mar 2010
Does employer refers employee who have exemptions from exam or the ones who actually passed the exams ?
LightningFist
post Nov 8 2014, 08:27 PM

Minion of the Damned
Group Icon
VIP
3,965 posts

Joined: Apr 2009
QUOTE(PoPoBear @ Nov 8 2014, 11:58 AM)
Does employer refers employee who have exemptions from exam or the ones who actually passed the exams ?
*
not relevant, because it is the same whatever you do. An employer doesn't really care which system you follow (obviously the distinction between life and non-life matters), unless there is a geographic/regulatory reason (FIA/FFA in the UK, FIAA in Australia, FSA/FCAS in the US - but there are exceptions where they don't really care about this even).

anyway, other than the FIA right now, most actuarial students have to go through an external system for the hardest few exams. this would also normally be the case for the FIA since very few people would do that much postgraduate study leading to all but the last exam being exempted.

it's a commonly spread idea that passing external exams is favourable compared to exemptions. i don't think it's relevant because most people would be surrounded by others who went through the same system anyway - Malaysia (and Singapore) would be unique because you get students who return from all over, and so there is a mixture of systems used. in that case, it would be hard to compare them but i believe Malaysian employers haven't really bothered and just take the number of exams at face value (or the specific subjects passed) - they do have pay raise scales though. anyway, exemptions are usually only for the preliminary and/or associate level exams (other than FIA), and they can be quite inflexible.

the advantage of exemptions is obviously you don't need to try to fit an external exam in with your uni schedule (although this is not really an 'advantage' anymore because when you work you'll realise it's hard to also study), and your teachers are supposed to teach you the right stuff that you need to pass the exam set by them. the advantage of external exams is that they sometimes can be easier (by pass rates and also by actual difficulty, based on what others have told me) and they are often cheaper (don't need to pay 5 figures for a uni course, if you need exemptions or need to resit). again, this only applies to the lower level exams, because many of the last few exams are just bloody hard no matter what they are and have no exemptions.
MO staik
post Jan 27 2016, 07:26 PM

New Member
*
Newbie
2 posts

Joined: Jan 2016


QUOTE(monkeyseemonkeydo @ May 23 2009, 04:59 PM)
I'm going to try to answer your questions. First and foremost, a degree in Actuarial Science is not necessary for a career in Actuarial Science. The only reason why people choose to do a degree in Actuarial Science is because they want exemptions from professional papers and want a leg up in them. However, I know for a fact that UK companies do not specifically employ students who did Actuarial Science - they hire people who have any Mathematical background. This is because the papers which you get exemptions from (CT1 - 8) are not difficult. In fact, CT7, the economics paper is just a simpler version of the A Levels Economics Paper! I know people who complete their CTs in a year and a half worth of studying, without any exemptions. One more problem I encounter when having a degree in Actuarial Science is that you pigeon hole yourself into that profession. It doesn't allow you to diversify into many other financial branches as it is so specialised in its own way, and that might be hard for a person who wants to find a job which is not actuarial-related in the future. Truth be told, I applied to do Mathematics in Cambridge as well, and if I had gotten the offer, would have accepted it straightaway.

It is good that you are trying to find out that if it is Maths that you like, or is it AS. Actuary's main industry is insurance. They are risk managers, they try to maintain the solvency of the company by managing the risk effectively. In a nutshell, the work that an actuary does in insurance can be divided into two - Pricing and Valuation. In Pricing, actuaries have to price insurance products so that the company will make a profit. This is not as easy as it sounds because the way insurance works, the company only suffers a loss in the future, and it is up to an actuary to price the product in a way that it is improbable for the company to go bankrupt anytime in the future. That is why we have projections and forecasts. In Valuation, actuaries need to take the premiums that people pay to invest in the best possible assets. This is necessary for the company to make a profit, because many products only allow to break-even, and it is up to the actuary to find the most valuable financial assets to invest in. There are consultant and contractor actuaries as well. They move from company to company advising insurance companies on how best to price their products, how they value their products, how they meet regulation, etc... They are one of the most well-paid people in the field. An actuary can become Chief Financial Officer and eventually CEO of a company. The fact is that insurance companies need us. We are the experts when it comes to the financial matters of an insurance firm.
Do let me know if you require more information.

my iI like the work. I like the challenge. I like the fact that I have different stuff thrown at me everyday. Sometimes, it does come to a point when I ask myself if it is worth it, especially having to come back from work and put myself in front of books. But I genuinely love the job I am given, and I really don't see myself doing anything else. I think it is the interest that keeps me here, and the fact that I do like applying Mathematics in practical business problems that helps me maintain nterest in the field. Plus, the fact that once I qualify, I'll get a FIA behind my name, which is pretty cool.


Added on May 23, 2009, 5:04 pm

No, that is not true. If that were true, we will be out of work in a few years time, when all the young guns come and take over our positions.

Back in Malaysia, due to the low pass rates, there are usually around 1 - 2 qualified actuaries and many actuarial students in each company. I believe that AIA has around 10 qualified actuaries. In the UK, my team alone had 6 qualifed actuaries. And we were only one really really small part of the company, which I believe had around 60 qualified actuaries alone.

Actuaries have the highest turnover I have ever seen. This is because they are so demanded that they just pretty much move from company to company in search of higher pay.
*
MO staik
post Jan 27 2016, 07:29 PM

New Member
*
Newbie
2 posts

Joined: Jan 2016


i did MPC at A level but i late realised that i am interested in the business world.i never really liked accounts in all my high school experience,so imagine my interest when i discovered i could merge into it using my mathematics.is this wise?i mean,im up for it

Michael_Light
post Jan 27 2016, 09:32 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
473 posts

Joined: Dec 2010
From: Kuala Lumpur


Actuarial field in Malaysia is flooded with actuarial graduates! Many of the student in Malaysia are still misled by the fantasy that actuarial science degree = qualified actuary = high pay salary which is not true. Many of my friend (local graduate) are struggling to get a permanent job in actuarial department in insurance field even with few papers on hand. Many ended up in risk management, finance or data analyst. Quite sad.

This post has been edited by Michael_Light: Jan 27 2016, 09:33 PM
HweiYee
post Apr 10 2017, 04:33 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
53 posts

Joined: Feb 2017
From: Penang


QUOTE(conankun @ Nov 7 2014, 03:27 PM)
Currently studying AS in um, Third year.

Going to take my third papers but still completely undecided for my future career pathway =3

We do have around 30-35 batchmates per year before this year intake. For year 2014, we have 40 plus juniors. Hope this info help the estimation haha. One more important information is we have largely malay batchmates which more into Takaful or islamic finance side, if you exclude that part of market. However, we still left with around 10-15 who is eagerly to enter actuarial field.

*Numbers stated is for each year and UM providing four year course*
*
Hi,

I'm currently waiting to be offered into either UM or UKM AS degree. Is it true that the syllabus in UM are more updated as compared to UKM? I'm not very sure about it but rumors had it that the syllabus in UKM are mostly syllabus in 90s and students have to put in comparatively more effort for the external papers.


Kcdw96
post Apr 10 2017, 08:21 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
708 posts

Joined: Feb 2016
QUOTE(HweiYee @ Apr 10 2017, 04:33 PM)
Hi,

I'm currently waiting to be offered into either UM or UKM AS degree. Is it true that the syllabus in UM are more updated as compared to UKM? I'm not very sure about it but rumors had it that the syllabus in UKM are mostly syllabus in 90s and students have to put in comparatively more effort for the external papers.
*
From what I understand (was offered ukm as but didn't attend), syllabus is largely the same but it doesn't really matter. At the end of the day, employers only care if you pass your actuarial papers
Michael_Light
post Apr 10 2017, 10:15 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
473 posts

Joined: Dec 2010
From: Kuala Lumpur


QUOTE(HweiYee @ Apr 10 2017, 04:33 PM)
Hi,

I'm currently waiting to be offered into either UM or UKM AS degree. Is it true that the syllabus in UM are more updated as compared to UKM? I'm not very sure about it but rumors had it that the syllabus in UKM are mostly syllabus in 90s and students have to put in comparatively more effort for the external papers.
*
Currently Ukm gives 2 vee credit while UM gives 3 vee credit. However new syllabus is kicking in for SOA so not sure if this still relevant. Other than that, both degree is equally recognised in the industry, so just grab whichever you get. smile.gif
HweiYee
post Apr 11 2017, 10:27 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
53 posts

Joined: Feb 2017
From: Penang


QUOTE(Kcdw96 @ Apr 10 2017, 08:21 PM)
From what I understand (was offered ukm as but didn't attend), syllabus is largely the same but it doesn't really matter. At the end of the day, employers only care if you pass your actuarial papers
*
QUOTE
Currently Ukm gives 2 vee credit while UM gives 3 vee credit. However new syllabus is kicking in for SOA so not sure if this still relevant. Other than that, both degree is equally recognised in the industry, so just grab whichever you get. smile.gif
I see hmm.gif What does it mean by VEE credit?

As far as I know, most Malaysian universities do provide VEE exemption from university subjects. So how does the credit works?
evelynn_p
post Apr 11 2017, 09:35 PM

New Member
*
Newbie
2 posts

Joined: Apr 2017
QUOTE(monkeyseemonkeydo @ May 23 2009, 07:04 AM)
I believe that people are doing Actuarial Science for the wrong reasons. I hope that this post will actually shatter the disillusionment that people have. Don’t get me wrong, I am not trying to discourage people to pursue this challenging course, its challenge being its ultimate reward. However, it is disheartening to see so many people get into this course and ending up not being qualified actuaries, because they fail to understand what this course is all about.
First and foremost, my qualifications: I have wanted to do Actuarial Science since I was in Form 4. In college, I did my research and I have looked at the qualifications provided in the UK, US, Australia and Malaysia. I have now finished my final year in Actuarial Science in the UK. I have interned in an insurance company in Malaysia as well as in my current location. And I have been in your shoes before.

To get the ball rolling, here are some misconceptions that need to be cleared up:

1. I want to do Actuarial Science because I like Math.
This is the biggest misconception that people have about Actuarial Science. In actual fact, a good knowledge of Mathematics is necessary, but a great knowledge is not. In the UK, the first 8 professional papers are somewhat Maths-based, but the tougher papers at the end are all written papers, which require a good command of English, a good knowledge of the insurance industry and good critical thinking skills. Throughout my course, the most difficult branch of Maths we did was Calculus and Linear Algebra, and that is not saying much. When you do start working, you will realise that the only Math you need are mostly addition and subtraction. Computer Programming will be the most important skill you will ever need. And to all of those who says that they need Further Math in their A-Levels, I did Math, Economics and Law. If you like Math, do a Mathematics degree.

2. I want to do Actuarial Science because the pay is good.
True, we have one of the highest starting salaries in the business world. Not by much though. The thing is, a qualified actuary does earn a lot. But to get that qualification, one has to pass professional papers, and those are not easy by a mile. The average time it takes to pass all your papers in Malaysia is around 6 years, depending on how good you are. (Some do take more than 10 years) And truth be told, all other professions will be able to earn a satisfactory remuneration within 10 years. If you want the money, go into Investment Banking. In a magazine which I have read, in business, while all other financial workers are paying off their mortgage for their first house, Investment Bankers are buying their second home.

3. I can pass all my professional exams if I work hard enough.
I want to believe this. I really do want to believe this. But with only 50 qualified actuaries in Malaysia, doesn’t it make you doubt that the only reason people are failing is because of a lack of effort? Studying is easy enough. Working is easy enough. Studying while working is not. While I was working in Malaysia, a colleague of mine works from 9 to 7 everyday, if he is lucky. On his way to and back from work, he studies on the LRT. If there is overtime, he will need to stay back and continue working. On weekends, he studies. At night, after being thoroughly exhausted at work, he studies. And while doing all these, he needs to find time for his girlfriend, family and friends. Now, ask yourself this: can you picture yourself doing that for a year? 3 years? 10 years?

I am really glad I chose this course. I know I would spend half my time working staring in a computer at spreadsheets. I know it will be a hard few years in front of me. I also know that I want nothing more than to qualify as a professional actuary, as I do love what I do very much. But I wished I knew what I was in for before I made the decision. And I do hope that people who read this will have the ability to make an informed decision about the course that is Actuarial Science.
*
Does actuary only working in insurance companies?
Michael_Light
post Apr 11 2017, 09:47 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
473 posts

Joined: Dec 2010
From: Kuala Lumpur


QUOTE(HweiYee @ Apr 11 2017, 10:27 AM)
I see  hmm.gif What does it mean by VEE credit?

As far as I know, most Malaysian universities do provide VEE exemption from university subjects. So how does the credit works?
*
VEE credit is part of requirement for you to obtain the Associate title other than exams, module etc. You will be granted exmption for VEE if you get certain grade for approved subject by SOA.
Michael_Light
post Apr 11 2017, 09:56 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
473 posts

Joined: Dec 2010
From: Kuala Lumpur


QUOTE(evelynn_p @ Apr 11 2017, 09:35 PM)
Does actuary only working in insurance companies?
*
The traditional field for actuaries are life and general insurance. Actuaries also work in bank, takaful, consultancy and so. Do note that not all people doing actuarial job are actuaries and vice versa.
HweiYee
post Apr 12 2017, 09:09 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
53 posts

Joined: Feb 2017
From: Penang


QUOTE(Michael_Light @ Apr 11 2017, 09:47 PM)
VEE credit is part of requirement for you to obtain the Associate title other than exams, module etc. You will be granted exmption for VEE if you get certain grade for approved subject by SOA.
*
According to your previous reply, you mentioned about UKM giving 2 VEE credit while UM 3 VEE credit. Does it mean that UKM grad would need to take another paper to get the other VEE credit while UM would get a full exemption from VEE? confused.gif


Searingmage
post Apr 12 2017, 03:50 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,809 posts

Joined: Feb 2010


QUOTE(HweiYee @ Apr 12 2017, 09:09 AM)
According to your previous reply, you mentioned about UKM giving 2 VEE credit while UM 3 VEE credit. Does it mean that UKM grad would need to take another paper to get the other VEE credit while UM would get a full exemption from VEE?  :confused:
*
Yes. But it's a very very small paper. Shouldn't affect you too much whether it is exempted or not.
Do note that UM course is 4 years while ukm is 3 years.
Michael_Light
post Apr 12 2017, 09:39 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
473 posts

Joined: Dec 2010
From: Kuala Lumpur


QUOTE(HweiYee @ Apr 12 2017, 09:09 AM)
According to your previous reply, you mentioned about UKM giving 2 VEE credit while UM 3 VEE credit. Does it mean that UKM grad would need to take another paper to get the other VEE credit while UM would get a full exemption from VEE?  :confused:
*
VEE will only affect you when you want to obtain the ASA title. If you are short of VEE credit, then you must either go back to university to attend certain subject or take online course endorsed by soa which can cost up to 1k+- USD. Note that VEE is not exams but courses, they provide exposure for non-actuatial related stuff like economics, corporate finance etc.

This post has been edited by Michael_Light: Apr 12 2017, 09:40 PM

2 Pages  1 2 >Top
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.2123sec    0.39    5 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 4th December 2025 - 07:58 PM