Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

Business The Truth about Actuarial Science, It is not only about the Math

views
     
RyukA
post May 24 2010, 10:46 PM

On my way
****
Senior Member
612 posts

Joined: Jan 2010


QUOTE(xzjasonzx @ May 24 2010, 01:08 PM)
Just for curiosity, nowadays actuarial science sumhow became the dream course for everyone who are good in maths, it's like ''oh I got an A in maths, I want to be an actuary'' kind of thing. Will this be like a trend like the IT course 10 years or more ago whereby it suddenly became a popular course and end up there are less jobs compare to the graduates?

I'm asking this because I have seen and heard many people that scored an A+ in spm add maths tend to have the passion to be an actuary someday, is this a false sense that scoring in maths is enough to study actuarial science?

Is there such a high demand for actuary? If many people who are good in maths or even those who scored an A in exams go for actuarial science, would this amount way surpass the actual demand for it in the market?

I ask these questions because actuarial science has become a blooming course in the world where more and more universities provide such course. For parents in thier 40s or 50s, they didn't even heard of this course in the past, and by encouraging their children's dream alone without knowing the actual situation, would this lead to dissapointments or regrets later on?
*
1. yes. It's a pretty big misconception.

2. Drop-out rate is quite high. Not because its hard or what. partly, yes, its kinda tough. partly, Math lovers seek their passion on math/ statistics degree. Took them quite some time to realise Actuarial is not their cup of tea.

3. Comparing Math ability:
mathematics degree > Engineering degree > Actuarial degree

4. Statistics is boring for most people. Especially Pure math lovers.

5. You need to chunk in Economics and Finance as well.

6. It may distort and surpass the market, but it will take hell long. 2/3 dies off at year 2. getting a degree and being qualified as an professional actuary is two different thing.

7. Not recommended if you hate sampling, reading and writing.

8. love financial math, understands pure math, explain applied math.
RyukA
post Aug 9 2010, 06:18 AM

On my way
****
Senior Member
612 posts

Joined: Jan 2010


QUOTE(gary12345 @ Aug 6 2010, 07:42 AM)
Thank you monkeyseemonkeydo for posting these informations !
I love acturial science !
I'm just form 4 this year ...
I would like to do acturial science in future because i like Math which you've mentioned for the first one .
Well , after i read this post ...
I actually got scared ...
haha ...

But my main target is to get " high salary " in future as i'm spending a lot of money now ... ( approximately 3k per month ) ...
hahah
what should i do ???
Can you give me some advice ?
Thank you !
*
Nowadays, math is just in anything.
It kinda give me the lol's when I read back education posts regarding actuarial studies.

Let me tell ya,
MATH IS IN EVERYTHING.

u really have to understand, what type of math do you like. "dont ask for the types, google it = ="
If you only like 1 or 2 type( lets say... basic algaebra and complex numbers? ) . Actuarial science is not ur cup of tea.
If you would like to undergo an actuarial degree, be prepared to study everything.
I am not quite sure how uni's in other country works, but in Aus,
an actuarial degree will comprise of units from Finance, Economics, Business basics, some corporate Laws and
the worst STATISTIC ever.
My entire course plan just comprise of 1 compulsory Math unit, which is during 1st sem for later statistics prerequisites.

You would note, you would have to develope individual study skills for every individual type of subject, obviously the way u study
Finance cannot be the way how u study Law. This is the exposure the degree wants to provide, in fact apart from "having interest", you have
to create interest.

An actuary mostly goes tightly with risk management, estimation of life contingencies, and doing evaluation of premiums.
the fact that it covers almost anything from the commercial, insurance, financial field, you need to have substantial knowledge form every sector.
This is also why I find this course interesting, as u get to study "everything".

Everyone wants to get a high salary. Any professional jobs CAN give u a high salary job as well. Ermm.. medic? Engineer? Lawyer? Auditor? But they dont just come, you need to work for the top of it.

Enough scaring + truths,
YOU DECIDE. lol


RyukA
post Aug 9 2010, 10:57 PM

On my way
****
Senior Member
612 posts

Joined: Jan 2010


QUOTE(mumeichan @ Aug 9 2010, 09:39 PM)
Do you know what accounting is?

ps: Anyway, I'm not interested in trying to convince anyone any further that accounting is nor part of the actuarial field. Not trying to be lanci, just that I've done my part to summarize what I've learned so far since I'm doing an actuarial degree myself. To anyone who is interested in going into this field as well, it's you can either do more research beforehand or discover it sooner or later during your studies.
*
well. guys. Looking through all these, I am stuck in both. lol I am doing a double degree on Bachelor of Actuarial Studies/Bachelor of Commerce ( Professional accouting). I would like to say, you may argue that Actuary job is very distinct/different from accountancy. But, throughout my study, I can tell u confidently that there is somehow interception between the two. Besides, it relates to economics and finance as well. I believe SoA is not much different from IAA( Institute of Actuaries Australia),
there will be certain core technical paper that is mainly about Financial Reporting, Financial Math and Corporate finance. Apart from modelling, it is important for an actuarial student to have good background knowledge
about basic accountancy (analysing Financial statement etc). Since both exist in the commerce field, there will always be a little similarity. An accountant will be at an advantage if you can master some financial mathematics, or have the ability to do some data sampling. An actuary will be at an advantage, if you know how the accounting process goes, hence able to provide solutions through analytical skills.

After-all, you may end up working as an actuary for gov. statistics, accounting firms or insurance firms. Or one may be an accountant working in an actuarial firm. To progress further, may need these knowledge if you are about to take up big positions in a firm. the ultimate fact is that Accountancy is more just than book keeping. ( u do taxations, simple auditing, learn entity laws, management accounting much more)
RyukA
post Aug 25 2010, 12:22 PM

On my way
****
Senior Member
612 posts

Joined: Jan 2010


QUOTE(LightningFist @ Aug 24 2010, 11:07 AM)
Thanks for that.

I realise a lot of the skills needed for work in whichever field (finance, quantitative finance, actuary, banking) can and will be learned only then. But before that I have to do well first. I know that I cannot enter uni and simply because I don't have a further maths background I allow myself to fall behind.

Ok well I didn't take further maths that's why I'm planning to take classes or something at least to help me. I'd like to know what there was in Further Maths that I might have missed out on - CIE A level further maths is only A2 and only 2 papers (not sure if this is how it is for everyone)... while other A level boards have further math modules for AS and A2, some of which are interchangeable...

In A level maths I have covered algebra, pemutations and combinations, binomial expansion, polynomials, series/progression, differentiation, integration, differential equations, vectors, complex numbers (and others, but these are specifically mentioned in the CT list).

Now here are things I have never done/heard of (I am reading out of a non-comprehensive CT1-CT8 math content list): interpolation and local approximation, higher order derivatives, Lagrange multipliers/maximisation under constraints, Taylor's theorem (power series expansion of e^x), double integrals and changing their order, partial derivatives of two variables, (what are: exact, separarble, logistic, linear?) differential equations, matrices.

Now here are things in the CIE Further Maths syllabus I don't know: polar curves (how does this relate to polar coordinates?), area of a sector (some integration formula), sum of finite series, mathematical induction (something I am worried about), conjecture, reduction formula to evaluate definite integrals, mean values and centroids of 2D and 3D figures using strips, discs, or shells (including use of a parameter), arc lengths, complementary functions, particular integrals, the general solution, de Moivre's theorem for a positive integral exponent (to express trigonometrical ratios of multiple angles in terms of powers of trigonometrical ratios of the fundamental angle; for a positive or negative rational exponent; in expressing powers of sin θ and cos θ in terms of multiple angles; in the summation of series; in finding and using the nth roots of unity),
some vector product rules with |a||b|sinθ n where n is the unit vector (a2 b3 – a3 b2) i + (a3 b1 – a1 b3) j + (a1 b2 – a2 b1) k, the axioms of a linear (vector) space, linear independence, determine whether a given set of vectors is dependent or independent, the subspace spanned by a given set of vectors, a space is a linearly
independent set of vectors that spans the space, the dimension of a space is the number of vectors in a basis, represent linear transformations, ‘column space', ‘row space', ‘range space' and ‘null space', the rank of a square matrix, and use (without proof) the relation between the rank, the
dimension of the null space and the order of the matrix, use methods associated with matrices and linearspaces in the context of the solution of a set of linear
equations, evaluate the determinant of a square matrix and find the inverse of a non-singular matrix, ‘eigenvalue' and ‘eigenvector', as applied to square matrices, express a matrix in the form QDQ^-1.

What do I need to do? How much of the further pure maths is relevant? Is actuarial maths all about the vectors and matrices, because I don't like vectors and I haven't learned a lot of matrices, as exemplified by the above.

(School said prior statistics knowledge is not required)

Thank you. I hope this is understandable.

-About not taking further maths, it was because it was only A2 - of course now I regret it, but it did not seem like the right choice then, and I wanted to maximise my grades - I was wrong, of course, because A2 further maths would have helped immensely. It's not too late (to catch up before heading to uni?)
*
LMAO. I have no idea whats happening.
Bout the programming part( previous posts), you just to get a grasp of the idea, nothing too technical.
Our lecturer told us, in career, what u will staring at everyday will be Access and Excel. lol.

When working, most of the cumulative information/ calculations will be done by excel/financial software. but we learn it because
we need to know the concept of the calculations, origins of the "formulas" in order to explain to executives, clients, users what the heck does "this scenario" means.
ultimately, learn it for the sake of passing the exams. hehe

Basic Calculus is essential, some linear algebra coverage. And others just bunch of statistical functions to learn.
During our 1st semester, we took a MATH unit for the sake of prerequisites to latter statistic units. Thats the only "pure math" unit compulsory for us to do. lol
We are not engineers, our emphasis is on statistics.
Mathematical reasoning ability is very important, your understanding depends on that later on.

Welcome on-board. wink.gif
RyukA
post Aug 26 2010, 12:38 PM

On my way
****
Senior Member
612 posts

Joined: Jan 2010


QUOTE(LightningFist @ Aug 25 2010, 05:52 PM)
Haha RyukA you make it sound like it's all quite simple.

I know a lot of posts go up saying actuarial science doesn't have the serious hard kind of straight maths - I like the sound of that, because I am not a hard fan of vectors or trigonometric graphs.

However, looking at all the pure math topics they have, especially matrices and vectors, I kinda go like "Whaaah" cos who the hell likes that stuff anyway.

And mumeichan is telling me one god book will help me. I will definitely check it out after my exams.

Mumeichan are you in a UK school now?

And RyukA how is ANU? Do they have a July intake for Actuarial Science, and is it the same as the Feb intake? I can get in without Further Maths you reckon?
*
EVerything is equally simple yet equally hard.
My experience in this uni is that, every field no matter what u do, there will be challenges ahead.
Law students have to get hold with cases, debate on probational small courts. Engineering students work long time on derivatives, doing projects.
Finance students have to read up corporation issues, market info to prepare for assignment.

The actuarial degree in ANU will be abit of everything in the commercial scope while giving strong emphasis on statistics ( modelings).
The reason why some say Further math is important, is not because of the syllabus covered. But the fact that most of the time,
students that took further math somehow shown that they are keen on Mathematics, have strong analytical skills and good in
solving problems ( as a general assumption).
And to be able to survive this actuarial degree, you need to have all of these.
Like what the post above said, both math is quite different. Of course, if you took further math, you have a slight benefit ahead of others that didnt. But there's no guarantee u will do better. hehe
I didnt take further math, it was quite "hard" in the beginning to catch up, even failed my midsem on the calculus component LMAO last semester. but just work consistently. Got away with a distinction. lol.

Its not high level math that kills in the end, its the statistics. (According to fellow seniors.)


Added on August 26, 2010, 12:44 pmOh, and. Yea, u can get in without further math.Provided you score bloody well for math, and get a high average.
Prerequisites is essential but grade is the priority they seek. As long as the Math you do covers Statistics and calculus.

In ANU, I think its the same like other universities as well. You can take a degree no matter which semester u enrol in.
You get to plan and enrol your courses for each semester. For example certain MATH unit is unavailable for semester 2. So just do some other "required subject", and
do that particular unit at Sem1 next year. Its totally flexible to schedule. The school will also provide recommended plan for students to follow, but feel free to do modifications.

This post has been edited by RyukA: Aug 26 2010, 12:44 PM
RyukA
post Aug 26 2010, 09:38 PM

On my way
****
Senior Member
612 posts

Joined: Jan 2010


QUOTE(LightningFist @ Aug 26 2010, 06:24 PM)
Thanks for all the info guys.

RyukA: I see, TY, so you just switch up the classes and end up the same. Great smile.gif

Well I eyed Actuarial Science a little while back, too bad didn't take Further while I could have. My school Does offer it, and the schools won't be pleased that I didn't take it while I could have.

I like maths and calculus enough. The school says "prior knowledge of statistics is not required". I did S1 and I'm doing M1, didn't do S2. Suppose that doesn't matter then. (M = mechanics). Hope to get A*. But you know how it is, the results come out after application, and ultimately A* is not the requirement, but necessary if they hold. if they "hold" I am lucky, if they don't then ... sad.gif

I feel like I should tell the schools (compulsory personal statement) in my application that I have time from November 2010 till September 2010, and that I want to maybe get a work attachment and take math classes - actuarial stuff. Is that part about classes appropriate at all? They could think I am industrious, but they could think I am not prepared. And I want to make it clear that I am definitely ready, but I want to prep myself for the work ahead. How do I say this? Please help.
*
Do enlighten us,
what courses you are currently taking?
What subject are u currently taking?
What you gonna do next?
What Uni would you be interested to apply to?
RyukA
post Nov 4 2010, 05:26 PM

On my way
****
Senior Member
612 posts

Joined: Jan 2010


QUOTE(Imperfecion @ Nov 4 2010, 03:27 PM)
rclxub.gif I'm currently a Form 5 student from Malaysia opting to take up Ac .Sc. next year.
1)Which pre-uni courses should I take up considering STPM , A-levels , VCE , ADP.
2)What subject best to take.
3)Which uni.
*
Let's start by:
Why do you want to be an actuary? or why do you choose an actuarial degree? * to clear some misconception*

RyukA
post Nov 5 2010, 05:31 AM

On my way
****
Senior Member
612 posts

Joined: Jan 2010


QUOTE(IcyDarling @ Nov 4 2010, 09:47 PM)
gosh it seems like most of my smart friends are persuing for Actuarial Science.

Just wanna ask, if u persue ur studies in AS, what if you cant get the job(i know its mere impossible but what IF)? What else can you work with the diploma?
*
I hope I dont scare you with the insights.

Having an actuarial degree and working as an actuary is two different thing.
But of course, most of us that take an AS degree plan to work as an actuary.

Not to be harsh or demotivating, if most of your friends pursue Actuarial Science because:
1) a degree for smart people
2) lots of people seem to be into that field
3) the money
4) a course for high IQ (i lol'ed, but i heard that somewhere)

Then for obvious reason, 60%-70% of your friends may :
switch out, finish but not work as one, got frustrated.
It is like, not all students that are good in Biology can do medicine, or "have the attitude" to become a doctor.

I have seen much smarter students that love math, end up doing lot better it Engineering and computer science,
which involves alot of "fun" and "challenging" math as well.


Alright, to answer your question now,
it is VERY LIKELY when you graduate, you cant get a job.
In malaysia, the concept of Actuarial is not established yet, rather very new due to its hot demand.
Unlike, doctors and lawyers, where the demand in job market always runs a deficit. back home, only very established Insurance, re-insurance and
financial companies would hire actuaries.
So, unless you do well in your studies, PUT IN SELF-EFFORT to job hunt, participate vocational programs, and try to pass most of your "professional" exam,
it is unlikely you get a effortless employment.

I am not sure bout Diploma in AS ( even if I do a little, well I better not say anything bout it)
an AS degree is much wide in terms of coverage, for different professional board there will be different point within the syllabus to emphasis
Since my program is based on Institute of Actuaries Aus, an Aus AS degree will be a well blend of Economics, Business, Finance, and Statistics. ( gawd, I dunno repeat berapa kali dah)

Which means, if you fail to cope up, or you realise you dont like it, you can switch easily to one of these disciplines (degree) and put ur Credit points(studies courses) into use.
So, lets say u graduate with a degree in AS, u can work in fields related to Insurance, risk management, public management, financial sectors, investing, and statistics-related disciplines.
But, working as an qualified actuary will adapt large responsibility because if you approve a wrong model, the whole firm/insurance market might face huge consequences, thats why
its stressful as a career although the reward is high. yet, the climbing process is tiring, having to sit through many professional exams and years of studies.

That explain its low number of qualified actuaries world wide. but according to Senior actuaries from firms, they believe this trend will grow because now Actuarial Science are diversifying as more and more
commercial field import the use of actuaries, which is a good sign for us.

Feel free to ask ( after reading previous posts =.= )

RyukA
post Nov 6 2010, 01:05 AM

On my way
****
Senior Member
612 posts

Joined: Jan 2010


QUOTE(zeeyang @ Nov 6 2010, 12:06 AM)
IMHO if you love maths you should go for engineering. This is where you would apply your maths into fun and challenging tasks like calculating how much pressure can your building structures withstand.

Actuaries deal with risks about peoples and I must say it's extremely boring (for me at least). Be prepared to sit for long hours in front of a computer looking at long list of statistics about peoples.

If you are opting for actuarial science because of the maths then a maths degree would be a better option for you. Actuaries only use simple maths when they work. They are trained by all those vigorous maths because they need a HIGH accuracy for their results as it is vital for the company. And be warned, even if you are applying maths, it's won't be as fun as what usual maths would provide.

Example of work of actuaries --> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Excerpt_...003_Table_1.png
*
Yes. It does get very dry.
Those are just Life contigencies, part of the sylabus in AS.
This is the point of a 'statistic" which defines the study on a collection of a range of data. Working on stat can be boring but through stat this is how we study
Behaviour, and then the associated risk.

Of course, in working life there's lots of externalities that differ how a conventional working environment should be.
I do agree that people that look math dont exactly fit into AS, but then different people have different interest, even within math, some people
just loves statistics, some people hate calculus, some people cant understand algorithms, or cant live without algebra.
So I believe its bout finding the right job with the right interest than ranking these fields with distinct level of benefits.

Since it is very unlikely a professional engineer at work ever experience the working life of an actuary and vice versa.
I find it inappropriate for one to compare the working life of both fields, when one actually never/havn't experienced both.
By definition of simple math, everyone interprets it differently for its difficulty.
During conference with firms, we have came across lots of different type of actuaries, those working with Insurance firms with have different insight with those doing re-insurance , and investment.
There are actuaries that deal alot with accountants on capitalisation, and there are those that deal alot with gov. officials, pension schemes.

So even within the field, there's a well diversified range of skills to be applied on different environments. hence, a generalization of such would be unfair to
students on this thread that actually have the intention to see the world of AS before deciding.


*I have no intension to comment on your judgement of AS, but I do like to clarify certain point that may be misleading.

RyukA
post Nov 7 2010, 09:29 AM

On my way
****
Senior Member
612 posts

Joined: Jan 2010


QUOTE(gomes. @ Nov 6 2010, 05:17 AM)
alot of people with actuarial science degrees (speaking mainly for UK based degrees, e.g. LSE) dont necessarily became actuarists. they just work in the financial sector, like in a bank or something, but not related to actuarial. so with an actuarial science degree you can get a job in the financial sector, like analyst/graduate programme in banks etc. thats what quite a number of people with actuarial science degrees from the UK do
*
the concept of "actuaries" is different for now than years ago.
your term of "actuary" as intepreted, most probably the traditional actuaries, which are both "life actuaries" and "casualty actuaries" which work closely to insurance related firms.
As I said earlier, the field is now diversified to other commercial context.
As long as there's risk, and there's a way to play with that risk, then you can expect an actuary will be needed to play the role.

Actuary is more of a qualification than a career. One with actuarial skills, work as a senior director in firms, an actuarial researcher,
actuarial analyst, Financial advisor, consultant, liquidator and much more, but the fact they are still called a 'qualified actuary', is not because of their career,
but their professional qualfication at the level of FIA (fellowship).

*just to update, 2010 Feb: Institute of Actuaries (Aus & UK), revise the definition of "actuary" to cover both Associates and Fellows, rather than just Fellows.
So, in a verbal context, it is differentiated as Junior Actuaries ( part I completion), and Senior Actuaries ( AIA, FIA)
RyukA
post Nov 9 2010, 04:51 AM

On my way
****
Senior Member
612 posts

Joined: Jan 2010


QUOTE(Searingmage @ Nov 9 2010, 12:12 AM)
Hmm, I believe he meant those that completed the degree but did not take professional papers? Hence, they are not called actuary if that's the case, no?
*
That depends. If these people finished their degree, took professional papers and left the industry for other commercial field,
they are still (qualified) actuaries.
If there are people that got the degree, but didn't take professional papers (yet), however work as analyst in insurance firms, they
are still "actuarial analyst", but not professional actuaries by title. means they are not qualified to approve projects and figures (yet).

If there are people that finish their degree, but didn't work as anywhere related to the industry nor advanced in studying the further papers,
they are not actuaries. Clear nuff.
RyukA
post Nov 11 2010, 07:07 PM

On my way
****
Senior Member
612 posts

Joined: Jan 2010


QUOTE(LightningFist @ Nov 11 2010, 05:55 PM)
An actuarial degree is irrelevant. You are an actuary if you work or worked as an actuary, and to work as one you have to be qualified, either as an Associate or Fellow (in the UK), or elsewhere.

To be a new Associate of the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries (The Actuarial Profession) you need to:

- Have passed or be exempted for all 9 CT papers
- Have passed or be exempted for all 3 CA papers
- Complete one year's worth of work-based skills in the four key dimensions of practical application of actuarial skills, professional and ethical, communication and commercial.
- Attend a one-day professionalism course for Associates

To be a new Fellow you need to:

- Have passed or be exempted from any 2 (in one case 3) ST papers
- Have passed 1 SA paper
- Fulfill the work-based skills requirement (includes 3 years supervised actuarial work)
- Attend a two-day professionalism course within 12 months of being admitted as a Fellow
*
Irrelevant for the status, but relevant for the exposure.
RyukA
post Dec 21 2010, 09:25 AM

On my way
****
Senior Member
612 posts

Joined: Jan 2010


QUOTE(uowi @ Dec 21 2010, 03:41 AM)
I not in actuary field actually, just planning to start to walk on this road. Just wondering where to start with. Planning to take papers later without entering the actuarial science degree.
*
LOL. good luck with that.
I have heard so many cases where Actuarial science grads cant even handle the exams.
I like that attitude. Nice!!!! hhahahaa
RyukA
post Dec 22 2010, 12:07 PM

On my way
****
Senior Member
612 posts

Joined: Jan 2010




For the textbooks, I would recommend a seperate book for each underlying chapter within syllabus.
Saying that, get a book individually for Poisson processes, Stochastic processes, Credibility theories, risk theories
and on topics related to Actuarial Technique.
Since most of the Actuarial exams ( no matter which board) covers topic in a generally wide scope, so its best
to understand a particular theory/concept at its root and learn how it is put into practise on real life application.

Since purchasing recommended/prescribed textbooks is highly encouraged, I would also like to advise that you purchase books on specific actuarial topics for supplementary reading. And browse through the net for Actuarial research papers (most of it is not easy to understand, but still comprehensive enough to give u an idea).

perhaps this advise is only practical after u done the basic coverage exams. but still its always good to start early.
Start with bunch of Calculus & Probability materials.

good luck

This post has been edited by RyukA: Dec 22 2010, 12:07 PM
RyukA
post Feb 25 2011, 06:03 PM

On my way
****
Senior Member
612 posts

Joined: Jan 2010


QUOTE(SRLee @ Feb 25 2011, 12:28 PM)
I love to calculate probability.

I often calculate the probability of many different things in life (useful or not).

How could I get a "taste" of what is actuarial science?
*
loving probability is just the start, and barely enough.
Of course, instead of dealing with Numbers. the way we learn sorts of probability theory will be through
matrices, algebra and alot of Set theories, using A,B,C,D to learn the underlying logic.
Financial math must be your love, as what you learn in math, will be substituted with Interest rate and numbers with high S.F.
and subsequent financial modelling. This comprise a very tough time handling sorts of weird cash flows.

when Probability meets these Cash flows, u get financial uncertainty, which explains risk, arising studies in investment strategy,
going through Continuous time finance, which have sh*t loads of stochastics in it, which can be said a "probability sample space" at its worst.

Survival model give u taste of what traditional actuaries do, scrolling through life mortality tables, and make insurance decisions, upon payoff, and project further evaluations.

that would be the very brief taste of AS. if you cant handle Mathematic theories ( doing proves, explaining theories, instead of just advanced calculations),
dont take it.
probability is just too hard to describe, as probability is the root in high level statistics, try looking through advanced statistics, and decide whether probability is really ur cup of tea, if not you will really really really have a very bad time in it.

Finance is perhaps where Actuarial Studies is highly applied on in Australia (IAA), not sure with the emphasis in other boards. It requires an interest in learning stocks, shares, markets, Interest rate calculations, and invesment strategies. If you find those boring, AS might be a very boring subject for you. Do think carefully.


Do go online and do more research upon deciding whether AS is suitable for you. Ask if in doubt wink.gif
RyukA
post Mar 4 2011, 09:42 PM

On my way
****
Senior Member
612 posts

Joined: Jan 2010


QUOTE(lostintransition @ Mar 4 2011, 02:51 PM)
Hi All,
Just looking for some advice from "sifus" here......

I am a fully qualified accountant (ACCA UK) and is looking for sort of like a career change from accounting to finance field. If, and say if, I choose to do actuarial science, is it advisable to attempt a "teaser" paper first rather than diving in like a Rambo and get myself killed for nothing?

The Institute of Actuaries (UK) allow the public to do CT1 without the commitment of being a member. I believe it maybe a good idea to attempt paper CT1 Financial Mathematics just to test the water.

What if I pass the paper and seem to like it? Is it any indicators that I should proceed and do CT2 to CT8? Or just passing CT1 is too early to tell?

By the way, I am just planning to do self study and via correspondence course with BPP (Actuarial Science Training provider company). Experience wise... sadly, I am working for an MNC (manufacturing) in Penang and therefore is devoid of finance exposure.

Or maybe I am being too naive? That it is better for me to do CFA Level 1 instead? And what is the difference between CFA versus the actuarial exams? Noted that alot of actuarial graduates (actuaries wannabe) end up doing CFA instead.

Thanks in advance...Any feedback, no matter how crude is always welcome.
*
Your queries regarding CT1 has been answered in another thread; Actuarial Professional papers.
However I will answer further from here, explaining which CT you might want to take to have a taste of the Actuarial Field.

CT2 will be quite easy for you, because the coverage is basically for Actuaries to get a hold of some Corporate Governance issues and Financial reporting, of which an accountant is more than familiar within every details of it. But, do revise the CT2 sylabus for any changes.

CT3 will be the start of an everyday concept that an actuary will have to deal with in his career. probability and Statistics, again learning things from
mathematical concepts up to solving complicated problems, all advancement of Stochastics, Contingency studies, Survival models and Credibility calculations starts from the concepts you learn in CT3. Hence, this is a very good paper to start with.

CT4- After CT3, expansion of studies in Samples Space, Stochastic approach, and introducing you to calculations related to pricing based on mortality rates.

CT5 - Advanced, best do it after majority paper is completed. the emphasis of Actuarial techniques in CFs and projections.

CT6 - Advanced, The component with the most Eff-ed up theories, and hard to understand theories. covering sufficiently on Credibility of data and various approaches in Risk. and their calculations.

CT7 - basically for the aim of giving Actuaries the required knowledge in intermediate economics, which might fall into the equation on decisions or pricing decisions which is Supply and Demand driven, or have other MAcro factors involved in it. Can be taken at a preliminary level.

CT8 - No joke, do it last.

CT9 - Business and Ethic module, nothing much surprising, just do tonnes of reading on Professional ethics, code of conduct blabla ( in IAAus, this is done under a Bridging course after Part II papers)

The UK sylabus and Aus sylabus fall within similar coverage on part I. Further on, its still similar just that IAA might cover certain things earlier while IoA UK prefer to put certain papers first before the other and vice versa.

We use to have inner jokes when classmates failed units, then we annoy them to take CFA instead! hahaha, and the ridiculous acronym
CFA = Council of Failed Actuaries haha. but how hard it is, I have no experience to judge. Since Part I and II of CFA is purely MCQ.
10000% lot more easier than clearing Actuarial CTs. The coverage of CFA sylabus put an emphasis on basic Finance ( if you do CT1, this is nothing),
portfolio valuation and construction, Investment studies, and some theoretical Corporate FInance issues.

Questions in the exam will be more direct as told by one of my friend, alot of Plug and Play questions.
but it is understandable for CFA to be more "exam-friendly" as the CFA body is not concentrated to the development of one career (no requirement for financial analyst to be a fellow of CFA) , unlike IAA, IAA will oversee and reflect the standard of qualified Actuaries practising worldwide, which perhaps explain the difficulty and complication of its admission processes.


Ask if in doubt. Thanks
RyukA
post Mar 26 2011, 03:07 PM

On my way
****
Senior Member
612 posts

Joined: Jan 2010


QUOTE(hjaxuan @ Mar 21 2011, 12:02 AM)
I am nw currently waiting SPM result,

And  I have a few questions, hope u all can answer it.

1) Is there any company that provide AS grad scholarship?

2) What subject should I choose for A-level?
*
If you dont mind, go through page 7 to page 10 in this post. the answer u seek is somewhere inside. lol
RyukA
post Mar 29 2011, 08:21 PM

On my way
****
Senior Member
612 posts

Joined: Jan 2010


QUOTE(hjaxuan @ Mar 28 2011, 08:47 PM)
I have go throught all of the pages but still nt yet get the answer I want.

Can someone help me?? T.T
*
the Scholarship enquiry perhaps those JPA threads can give u the answer, or easier "ask there" lol

A little add-on, mostly companies wont fund ur Actuarial degree, but there will be more companies that fund you
study fees and costs for your professional examinations once you complete ur degree and start a career in a insurance/actuarial firm.


Regarding suitable subject for a-level. I am not quite sure what u want.
Lightningfist can probably give u insight bout the difficulty of these a-level subjects accordingly.

But if you would want better answers, ask better questions.
e.g. tell us what subject u decided/want to take in A-levels

then we may advise you whether its appropriate for ur pursue in Actuarial Science.

Cheers.

This post has been edited by RyukA: Mar 29 2011, 08:24 PM
RyukA
post Apr 4 2011, 03:03 PM

On my way
****
Senior Member
612 posts

Joined: Jan 2010


QUOTE(pizzzaboy @ Apr 4 2011, 02:43 PM)
I just graduated SPM examination and am an ART student (only taken general mathematic, Perdagangan, economy but not Add Math) well, as a student not being exposed to add math.  Does it affect the ability learning to become an actuary?  unsure.gif

My friend wanted to study locally for actuarial science in UTAR; I was wondering would it affect his chance of working oversea since his study a local U?

I just found out about courses looks similar to actuary.  Like Financial engineering and mathematical financial.  Are these courses similar to actuary?

Btw, good post and thank you. ^^
*
Again, I want to ask the same question.
Do you know what an actuary does? Why would you want to become an actuary?
*this is to check whether you know what to do next*

Admath f5 is hardly anywhere close to the real concept of Mathematics, except exposing a person to some mathematic formula and learning how to apply.
I would suggest you try to take Math in any Pre-U that involve Calculus( differentiation, Integration, Rates) and Linear Algebra (which is a further study in the Matrix topic that u learn in f5). if you like it, and do well, then Actuarial Science may be still manageable for you.
To answer your question, unless you are a genius in Mathematics even without f5 addmath,
it is nearly impossible for you to understand any math concept (to catch up) that you will be learning in an actuarial degree.

If you havn't go through few pages back from this post, I reckon' you do that.
then you will understand that to fully qualify as an actuary, one have to further take a number of professional papers to pass these exams to obtain fellowship, which by then one can call him/herself a qualified actuary.
There are actuarial institutes around the world, few famous ones namely SoA, IAA, CSA,HKIA.
Try to read previous posts, I am sure we have written the same thing over and over again.

A part of an actuarial degree involves studies in Continuous time finance and stochastic processes, these are common topics of Actuarial science and Financial engineering.
Actuary does work in finance sectors although the traditional approach is on insurance and pension funds. this explains why both of these field look so much alike in the finance sector,
but what you learn in a Actuarial degree will be highly different from mathematical finance (which they go deeper into derivative pricing and stochastic model stock pricing) or financial engineering.

Do spend some time reading up previous posts, you may find them helpful.

RyukA
post Aug 4 2011, 02:58 PM

On my way
****
Senior Member
612 posts

Joined: Jan 2010


QUOTE(AceSaboLuffy @ Jul 23 2011, 07:04 PM)

Added on July 23, 2011, 7:08 pm
Hey, I do have interest in the Actuarial Profession. But I want do some research before I make a decision. Do you know that where can I find a qualified actuary in Malaysia? or in Sabah? I'm from Sabah. I would like to talk with them to gain more informations about this career. Thank you and please asap.


Added on July 23, 2011, 7:12 pm
Hey, I do have interest in the Actuarial Profession. But I want do some research before I make a decision. Do you know that where can I find a qualified actuary in Malaysia? or in Sabah? I'm from Sabah. I would like to talk with them to gain more informations about this career. Thank you and please asap.
*
Firstly. Actuarial profession is a term itself, that can have broad interpretations.
To your preference, do you in particular mean traditional roles : like pension funds, life insurance, and policy pricing,
or does it include modern roles like Risk analysis, provisions & forecasting, financial liability management, superannuation, and
reinsurance?

Until you can identify your specific interest within the actuarial scope, the range from financials to risk-evaluation, are inclined to different field of study. Perhaps by suggesting your career preference (if it applies) within the actuarial context, might help you find the transition between your past career to your goals, less complicated. (e.g. You wont want to find a life actuary to talk about transitions from accounting career to a financial risk analyst position).


Just to make sure, you get the advise you need.
Cheers.


Added on August 4, 2011, 3:05 pm
QUOTE(AceSaboLuffy @ Jul 24 2011, 09:44 AM)
Thanks for replying. Yeah. I've checked the website of Actuarial Society of Malaysia to find their contacts. But there is just a list of their committee members but no attached with their contact details. Is it really hard to find an actuary in Malaysia? Those posts above said that got around 50+ actuaries in Malaysia,so, I think at least can find one! Between, where do you come from ? Outside Malaysia?

Anyway, please update me if you have the latest information about the actuary or about this career !! Thanks.
*
I do have a few actuarial contacts on a formal basis. But it will be best to enquire on employment-related queries, as you know,
qualified actuaries in malaysia are usually very busy (considering most of them work for few firms, or lead the team). hwoever, you can always address more casual questions to actuarial institutes, or organisations, which you might get a more "dedicated and accurate" answer.
If its generally on "studies", general career prospects and suggestions, then this forum shall be deemed sufficient to get an overview of how things work.

Dont hesitate to ask.

This post has been edited by RyukA: Aug 4 2011, 03:06 PM

2 Pages  1 2 >Top
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0570sec    0.15    6 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 6th December 2025 - 07:20 PM