QUOTE(Silon @ Jun 3 2005, 12:45 AM)
from the way u speak, im thinking: 'this guy knows what he is saying', and u got my attention on Kapersky.

ive being using mcafee for 2years, ever since v8 came out, ive been using it for long term. i use their firewall too, i just
love their 'silent protection' philosophy.
these updates, they apply automatically and download quickly? is kapersky a resource hog? [apart from the startup issue].
how about total scan times? is it efficient?
Yeah, updates download surprisingly fast and they install instantly upon download completion in the background, so it doesn't bother you. It also has automatic update which you can set to scan at any interval as the following:
Every hour / 3 hours / 6 hours / 12 hours / 1 day / 2 days / 3 days / 1 week
It's not a resource hog, it uses very little memory and cpu power.
Total scan time I noticed is slightly longer than Norton. The first Kaspersky scan you do will take a long time, but subsequent scans will be much faster because of their intelligent scan system.
Also, when I used to use Norton, I always kept it updated. But one day, with my friend's recommendation, I decided to shift to Kaspersky, upon completion of the first Kaspersky scan, there were 14 viruses and trojans detected in my laptop that Norton overlooked.
As for another one of my friends, I suggested to him to try Kaspersky because he felt that there were some viruses that his McAfee did not detect. After he did his first scan, Kaspersky detected a few trojans and viruses that McAfee ignored. Also one technician from Acer who attended to my friend's laptop before he used Kaspersky told my friend not to use McAfee because it doesn't scan thoroughly.
Personally, I'd recommend Kaspersky to anybody. As long as you have a P4 comp or laptop, you should be fine with Kaspersky.