Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

58 Pages « < 24 25 26 27 28 > » Bottom

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 Intel Q9xxx and Xeon 33x0 Family, Show the rest what Intel Quadies can do!

views
     
hengmy
post Dec 2 2008, 11:45 AM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,991 posts

Joined: Jan 2007
From: Seri Kembangan



QUOTE(salimbest83 @ Dec 2 2008, 09:09 AM)
okay guys..

my 2nd day got my hand of this Quadie 9550..
no time to test and playing with bios..
just
1)change pci/pcie freq to 37.6 (burn my ex graphic card coz forgot about this setting)
2) set mem divider to 1:1
3) just try fsb 400..than 433 and lastly stop at this 443.9FSB

other setting just leave to auto..

and guess what..
the bios just crank up the voltage to 1.520 volt o load..
and temp as show by OCCT go as high as 85C..
core temp show 76C.

so which one show the actual value for the temp..
pls enlighten me
ps:
yeap..
i know i need another cooler for sure..
*
the vcore look like abit too high hmm.gif
salimbest83
post Dec 2 2008, 11:51 AM

♥PMS on certain day♥
*******
Senior Member
8,639 posts

Joined: Feb 2006
From: Jelutong Penang



QUOTE(hengmy @ Dec 2 2008, 11:45 AM)
the vcore look like abit too high hmm.gif
*
yeah..thats what i got if leave all setting AUTO in bios..
will try to manually set it after this..
and what other thing/ setting that i should change..

after im read some post here...ppl just using 1.2 or 1.3 only for Vcore..is it possible with mine?


metsatsu
post Dec 2 2008, 01:49 PM

Chocolate Starfish
Group Icon
VIP
2,510 posts

Joined: Dec 2004
From: Penang Island and Bidor


Look at my sig. That's my current vcore
-pWs-
post Dec 2 2008, 03:04 PM

Look at all my stars!!
Group Icon
Elite
8,545 posts

Joined: Aug 2006
From: 224.0.0.6


QUOTE(salimbest83 @ Dec 2 2008, 09:09 AM)
okay guys..

my 2nd day got my hand of this Quadie 9550..
no time to test and playing with bios..
just
1)change pci/pcie freq to 37.6 (burn my ex graphic card coz forgot about this setting)
2) set mem divider to 1:1
3) just try fsb 400..than 433 and lastly stop at this 443.9FSB

other setting just leave to auto..

and guess what..
the bios just crank up the voltage to 1.520 volt o load..
and temp as show by OCCT go as high as 85C..
core temp show 76C.

so which one show the actual value for the temp..
pls enlighten me
ps:
yeap..
i know i need another cooler for sure..
*
PCI = 33MHz
PCI-E = 100MHz

-pWs-

tkh_1001
post Dec 2 2008, 03:11 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,547 posts

Joined: Oct 2007



QUOTE(salimbest83 @ Dec 2 2008, 11:51 AM)
yeah..thats what i got if leave all setting AUTO in bios..
will try to manually set it after this..
and what other thing/ setting  that i should change..

after im read some post here...ppl just using 1.2 or 1.3 only for Vcore..is it possible with mine?
*
i believe u can get lower vcore if u test it by slowly increasing ur clock to see how far it can go with lower vcore...

and the temp u can use the one from coretemp as reference with tjmax set to 100c.......

as u OC, if adding vcore by quite an amount already also cant seem to help stabilise the clock, u might wana adust ur vtt/vfsb and Vnb...

if ur mobo have gtl... try mess around with it also...

vcore on auto is kinda sweat.gif

hengmy
post Dec 2 2008, 04:13 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,991 posts

Joined: Jan 2007
From: Seri Kembangan



@metsatsu
can u share out your bios setting?
thx alot notworthy.gif
salimbest83
post Dec 2 2008, 04:21 PM

♥PMS on certain day♥
*******
Senior Member
8,639 posts

Joined: Feb 2006
From: Jelutong Penang



QUOTE(metsatsu @ Dec 2 2008, 01:49 PM)
Look at my sig. That's my current vcore
*
so..looks like i can use ur speed as my stable target..
will try to experiment tonight..

just my cooler holding me back..
just using AF 64 PRO only..

thinking to get CCF.. or xigmatex ..

or any recommendation?


Added on December 2, 2008, 4:32 pm
QUOTE(tkh_1001 @ Dec 2 2008, 03:11 PM)
i believe u can get lower vcore if u test it by slowly increasing ur clock to see how far it can go with lower vcore...

and the temp u can use the one from coretemp as reference with tjmax set to 100c.......

as u OC, if adding vcore by quite an amount already also cant seem to help stabilise the clock, u might wana adust ur vtt/vfsb and Vnb...

if  ur mobo have gtl... try mess around with it also...

vcore on auto is kinda  sweat.gif
*
erm.. will try to take some shot from my bios..
and post here..
im still noob in OCing intel Quad..lots of thing to adjust..
blush.gif

This post has been edited by salimbest83: Dec 2 2008, 04:32 PM
hengmy
post Dec 2 2008, 05:55 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,991 posts

Joined: Jan 2007
From: Seri Kembangan



QUOTE(salimbest83 @ Dec 2 2008, 04:21 PM)

erm.. will try to take some shot from my bios..
and post here..
im still noob in OCing intel Quad..lots of thing to adjust..
blush.gif
*
me too noob in quad OCing, hope all sifu here can share out their stable OC bios setting, thx alot notworthy.gif
tkh_1001
post Dec 2 2008, 06:56 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,547 posts

Joined: Oct 2007



actually imho OC settings cant really be shared tho cos each chip has different potential and the hardware pairing is also kinda different....

all that can be done is just share information on how to get stability imho... the rest have to try out and experiment urself liao sweat.gif
metsatsu
post Dec 2 2008, 07:39 PM

Chocolate Starfish
Group Icon
VIP
2,510 posts

Joined: Dec 2004
From: Penang Island and Bidor


QUOTE(hengmy @ Dec 2 2008, 04:13 PM)
@metsatsu
can u share out your bios setting?
thx alot notworthy.gif
*
my setting in bios is as so:

Vcore = 1.3375v
FSB voltage = 1.3v (if default is 1.2v can't remember sweat.gif )
MCH voltage = 1.6v (if default is 1.5v can't remember also)
PCIE voltage = +0.10v dunno what value and why wanna increase it, but just doing it for the sake of it. blink.gif
PCIE frequency = 101mhz
FSB:DRAM ratio = 1:1
ram timing = 4-4-4-15
DDR2 voltage = 2.05v
Loadline caliberation control = auto
436 x 8.5 = 3700mhz

the rest i didn't touch

but as tkh bro said, each mobo are different from another. this values which i used on my Gigabyte X38-DS5 can only be used as reference for other ppl. hope it helps in some way.
and for those who think i can improve and correct. please share with me yah.
hengmy
post Dec 2 2008, 07:44 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,991 posts

Joined: Jan 2007
From: Seri Kembangan



QUOTE(tkh_1001 @ Dec 2 2008, 06:56 PM)
actually imho OC settings cant really be shared tho cos each chip has different potential and the hardware pairing is also kinda different....

all that can be done is just share information on how to get stability imho... the rest have to try out and experiment urself liao sweat.gif
*
yea, but just for references as vnb and vtt voltage will be similar i guess smile.gif


Added on December 2, 2008, 7:46 pm
QUOTE(metsatsu @ Dec 2 2008, 07:39 PM)
my setting in bios is as so:

Vcore = 1.3375v
FSB voltage = 1.3v (if default is 1.2v can't remember sweat.gif )
MCH voltage = 1.6v (if default is 1.5v can't remember also)
PCIE voltage = +0.10v dunno what value and why wanna increase it, but just doing it for the sake of it.  blink.gif
PCIE frequency = 101mhz
FSB:DRAM ratio = 1:1
ram timing = 4-4-4-15
DDR2 voltage = 2.05v
Loadline caliberation control = auto
436 x 8.5 = 3700mhz

the rest i didn't touch

but as tkh bro said, each mobo are different from another. this values which i used on my Gigabyte X38-DS5 can only be used as reference for other ppl. hope it helps in some way.
and for those who think i can improve and correct. please share with me yah.
*
thx so much bro notworthy.gif

btw, do u think my psu enough juice for my rig?? with q9450 hmm.gif


Added on December 2, 2008, 7:46 pm
QUOTE(hengmy @ Dec 2 2008, 07:44 PM)
yea, but just for references as vnb and vtt voltage will be similar i guess smile.gif


Added on December 2, 2008, 7:46 pm
thx so much bro notworthy.gif

btw, do u all think my psu enough juice for my rig?? with q9450  hmm.gif
*
This post has been edited by hengmy: Dec 2 2008, 07:46 PM
tkh_1001
post Dec 2 2008, 07:58 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,547 posts

Joined: Oct 2007



QUOTE(hengmy @ Dec 2 2008, 07:44 PM)
yea, but just for references as vnb and vtt voltage will be similar i guess smile.gif

thx so much bro notworthy.gif

btw, do u think my psu enough juice for my rig?? with q9450  hmm.gif


Added on December 2, 2008, 7:46 pm
*
actually different mobo, proc chip potential and ram settings will need different Vnb and Vtt....

regarding ur psu, i think its still ok ok cukup makan ba laugh.gif
metsatsu
post Dec 2 2008, 08:09 PM

Chocolate Starfish
Group Icon
VIP
2,510 posts

Joined: Dec 2004
From: Penang Island and Bidor


I like to play safe. and i seriously believe that a better PSU will enable higher oc for certain components (i can be wrong, but i'm just saying this based on my past experience). 460w should be just enough i guess, but if u plan to oc hard out on your new proc. u better look for around 500w+
hengmy
post Dec 2 2008, 08:11 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,991 posts

Joined: Jan 2007
From: Seri Kembangan



QUOTE(tkh_1001 @ Dec 2 2008, 07:58 PM)
actually different mobo, proc chip potential and ram settings will need different Vnb and Vtt....

regarding ur psu, i think its still ok ok cukup makan ba  laugh.gif
*
QUOTE(metsatsu @ Dec 2 2008, 08:09 PM)
I like to play safe. and i seriously believe that a better PSU will enable higher oc for certain components (i can be wrong, but i'm just saying this based on my past experience). 460w should be just enough i guess, but if u plan to oc hard out on your new proc. u better look for around 500w+
*
yea, i feel the psu need to change also, 12v only 384w sad.gif
but lack of $$ now.. cry.gif

i think gonna use this as 24/7 first before i get a better psu sweat.gif



This post has been edited by hengmy: Dec 2 2008, 08:45 PM


Attached thumbnail(s)
Attached Image
ReeNz
post Dec 3 2008, 04:21 PM

Glory Glory!
******
Senior Member
1,467 posts

Joined: Dec 2004
From: Petaling Jaya/Melaka/USA



My Q9550 E0 stable at 3.4Ghz at stock (1.25v) and at 3.61 (425x8) at 1.2625v..it was a little bit weird i think, coz it is prime stable at 3.61 stock vcore but whenevr i play games, my pc will crash..as for temperature, my core0 is the hottest with 57c during priming at 3.61 (ambient is 25c)..

It cant boot to windows at 3.825 until vcore around 1.32..will try to prime it at that speed when my TRUE arrive with 2 scythe 110cfm fan (push n pull config)..My cpu temp will rise up to 64c juz for few min of priming at 3.8 with my current CCF..

This post has been edited by ReeNz: Dec 3 2008, 04:24 PM
salimbest83
post Dec 3 2008, 05:24 PM

♥PMS on certain day♥
*******
Senior Member
8,639 posts

Joined: Feb 2006
From: Jelutong Penang



QUOTE(-pWs- @ Dec 2 2008, 03:04 PM)
PCI = 33MHz
PCI-E = 100MHz

-pWs-
*
in bios just have 37.3MHz and 66.7MHz or DEFAULT aka (GC killer)


Added on December 3, 2008, 5:32 pm
QUOTE(metsatsu @ Dec 2 2008, 07:39 PM)
my setting in bios is as so:

Vcore = 1.3375v
FSB voltage = 1.3v (if default is 1.2v can't remember sweat.gif )
MCH voltage = 1.6v (if default is 1.5v can't remember also)
PCIE voltage = +0.10v dunno what value and why wanna increase it, but just doing it for the sake of it.  blink.gif
PCIE frequency = 101mhz
FSB:DRAM ratio = 1:1
ram timing = 4-4-4-15
DDR2 voltage = 2.05v
Loadline caliberation control = auto
436 x 8.5 = 3700mhz

the rest i didn't touch

but as tkh bro said, each mobo are different from another. this values which i used on my Gigabyte X38-DS5 can only be used as reference for other ppl. hope it helps in some way.
and for those who think i can improve and correct. please share with me yah.
*
yeap.. just try new setting...
voltage manually set to
VCore = 1.31v
MCH etc all bump 0.1v
pci freq change to 37.3
FSB:DRAM set 1:1
ram timing and voltage leave to auto.

test using OCCT v2.0 stable 1 hour..
@3.77GHz..temp on core 1

my mobo kinda hard to OC coz some time when im just 'kacau' RAM setting.. i end up reset the CMOS.
haish..


This post has been edited by salimbest83: Dec 3 2008, 05:32 PM
hengmy
post Dec 4 2008, 10:42 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,991 posts

Joined: Jan 2007
From: Seri Kembangan



finally get 3.5ghz 10 loops pass on IBT after tuning on the gtl ref rclxub.gif
dfi x48 lt is really tricky for quad overclocking rclxub.gif rclxub.gif
anyone using these board pls share me the gtl ref for quad at 450fsb and higher, thx alot notworthy.gif

user posted image
metsatsu
post Dec 5 2008, 08:16 PM

Chocolate Starfish
Group Icon
VIP
2,510 posts

Joined: Dec 2004
From: Penang Island and Bidor


QUOTE(hengmy @ Dec 4 2008, 10:42 PM)
finally get 3.5ghz 10 loops pass on IBT after tuning on the gtl ref  rclxub.gif
dfi x48 lt is really tricky for quad overclocking rclxub.gif  rclxub.gif
anyone using these board pls share me the gtl ref for quad at 450fsb and higher, thx alot notworthy.gif

» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «

*
wrong, it is the QUAD CORE which is tricky to overclok. smile.gif

This post has been edited by metsatsu: Dec 5 2008, 08:17 PM
hengmy
post Dec 5 2008, 09:03 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,991 posts

Joined: Jan 2007
From: Seri Kembangan



QUOTE(metsatsu @ Dec 5 2008, 08:16 PM)
wrong, it is the QUAD CORE which is tricky to overclok. smile.gif
*
after done some research for few days, this is the outcome i found.
compared to gigabyte and asus, these board are easily boot up a quad core at 450fsb or more without tweaking in gtl ref,
as for dfi x48 lt and ut version, if dont touch on gtl ref, u cant boot into window at all at 450fsb. rclxub.gif
after 400 fsb, gtl ref need to change to make it stable... doh.gif

or maybe i am wrong, just my psu not enuf juice doh.gif ?
metsatsu
post Dec 5 2008, 09:23 PM

Chocolate Starfish
Group Icon
VIP
2,510 posts

Joined: Dec 2004
From: Penang Island and Bidor


hhmm... not sure about the gigabyte X48. but my X38 is already struggling when it slowly touches 450. I was able to reach 450 when i was still using my Q9450. but then i have to increase the voltage all the way up to 1.325v and my vcore temp jumped up by 10c!!

As for your psu, it's rather subjective to conclude if it's underpowered. so yah, too bad... can't really tell. i would always spend some extra money to get higher power psu, to make sure that i dun regret later. smile.gif

58 Pages « < 24 25 26 27 28 > » Top
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0272sec    0.65    6 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 4th December 2025 - 10:12 PM