Intel Q9xxx and Xeon 33x0 Family, Show the rest what Intel Quadies can do!
|
|
 Dec 26 2008, 10:43 PM
|
 
VIP
2,510 posts Joined: Dec 2004 From: Penang Island and Bidor  
|
Bro hengmy. Mind to share ur bios setting? Though i know p45 has a higher fsb oc limit compare x38. But just wanna know, did u tweak anything else that enable u to oc higher other than up'ing all the voltages?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dec 26 2008, 11:12 PM
|
 
Senior Member
1,991 posts Joined: Jan 2007 From: Seri Kembangan 
|
QUOTE(metsatsu @ Dec 26 2008, 10:43 PM) Bro hengmy. Mind to share ur bios setting? Though i know p45 has a higher fsb oc limit compare x38. But just wanna know, did u tweak anything else that enable u to oc higher other than up'ing all the voltages? i have ady share before, mayb that thread hard to capture eye   here is the template for q9450 500 fsb stable on GA-EP45-UD3P » Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... « |
|
|
Dec 26 2008, 11:54 PM
|
|
VIP
2,510 posts Joined: Dec 2004 From: Penang Island and Bidor
|
Cool thx alot! But too bad now in outstation. And using gprs to surf lyn. Will give my bios another tweak when i get back home. But i think in ur case, u got a good chip and good mobo combo.
 |
|
|
Dec 27 2008, 12:02 AM
|
|
Senior Member
1,991 posts Joined: Jan 2007 From: Seri Kembangan
|
QUOTE(metsatsu @ Dec 26 2008, 11:54 PM) Cool thx alot! But too bad now in outstation. And using gprs to surf lyn. Will give my bios another tweak when i get back home. But i think in ur case, u got a good chip and good mobo combo. but yours is ady in 3.75ghz, 4ghz should not be a problem, coz your got +0.5 multiplier  but as far as i seen, this board clock the 45nm quad the best |
|
|
Dec 27 2008, 01:00 AM
|
|
VIP
2,510 posts Joined: Dec 2004 From: Penang Island and Bidor
|
Nah. The problem with x38 is that it has a rather low fsb oc limit. If u google gigabyte x38 tomshardware, u will find that its conclusion of the gigabyte x38 isnt very good
|
|
|
Dec 27 2008, 03:16 AM
|
Junior Member
197 posts Joined: Apr 2005 From: Shah Alam 
|
QUOTE(hengmy @ Dec 26 2008, 10:19 PM) i use 63% for the gtl ref, 67% is for 65nm i guess. its not that hard actually to calculatethe dfi bios setting use number instead of the 0.00xx like other mobo use, so even can calculate also hard to determine in the number? btw i tried clunk before but not allow me to get stable setting, but using 63% can get more stable setting  lets say 1.35v vtt = 1.310v (real) so for GTL 1/2 (1.310 * 67%) / 0.00724 0.8777 / 0.00724 = 121.229xxxx genapkan = 120  dunno right or not hehe |
|
|
|
|
|
Dec 27 2008, 03:42 AM
|
Senior Member
3,175 posts Joined: May 2006
|
QUOTE(metsatsu @ Dec 27 2008, 01:00 AM) Nah. The problem with x38 is that it has a rather low fsb oc limit. If u google gigabyte x38 tomshardware, u will find that its conclusion of the gigabyte x38 isnt very good all x38 chips are not known to be FSB record setters, its a limitation on the chip itself. X48 is a different story, however dfi's X38 is a little better then the rest by a marginThis post has been edited by bryanyeo87: Dec 27 2008, 03:43 AM |
|
|
Dec 27 2008, 04:17 AM
|
 
Elite
4,746 posts Joined: Dec 2007 From: Speed rule
|
QUOTE(bryanyeo87 @ Dec 27 2008, 03:42 AM) all x38 chips are not known to be FSB record setters, its a limitation on the chip itself. X48 is a different story, however dfi's X38 is a little better then the rest by a margin Agree on this but probably take a few hours to get thing stable,no?  Still remember 445FSB/4ghz on Quad,BSOD during SPI 1M,this is the result of not enough time to tweak  |
|
|
Dec 27 2008, 05:51 AM
|
Senior Member
4,947 posts Joined: Nov 2007
|
What vcore o? If low can enter Windows geng already
|
|
|
Dec 27 2008, 09:03 AM
|
|
VIP
2,510 posts Joined: Dec 2004 From: Penang Island and Bidor
|
Sigh... Really hope that i can at least touch 3.8ghz without having to use some insane voltage
 |
|
|
Dec 27 2008, 11:51 AM
|
|
Senior Member
1,991 posts Joined: Jan 2007 From: Seri Kembangan
|
QUOTE(huzai @ Dec 27 2008, 03:16 AM) its not that hard actually to calculate hmm, 0.877 is what thing ? lets say 1.35v vtt = 1.310v (real) so for GTL 1/2 (1.310 * 67%) / 0.00724 0.8777 / 0.00724 = 121.229xxxx genapkan = 120 dunno right or not hehe btw, i have found the clunk graph is not real, they seen like provide wrong real vtt value. anantech provide correct real vtt value for dfi x48, however i have tried but still not work for quad Added on December 27, 2008, 11:51 am QUOTE(metsatsu @ Dec 27 2008, 01:00 AM) Nah. The problem with x38 is that it has a rather low fsb oc limit. If u google gigabyte x38 tomshardware, u will find that its conclusion of the gigabyte x38 isnt very good so the fsb limit on where for a quad on x38? This post has been edited by hengmy: Dec 27 2008, 11:52 AM |
|
|
Dec 27 2008, 12:55 PM
|
|
Elite
4,746 posts Joined: Dec 2007 From: Speed rule
|
QUOTE(Silverfire @ Dec 27 2008, 05:51 AM) What vcore o? If low can enter Windows geng already 1.5 or 1.6vcore if i recall@heng,X38 wall is rather low but i have seen 6xxFSB on dual core from maximus extreme |
|
|
Dec 27 2008, 03:20 PM
|
|
Junior Member
197 posts Joined: Apr 2005 From: Shah Alam
|
QUOTE(hengmy @ Dec 27 2008, 11:51 AM) hmm, 0.877 is what thing ? nope, im using it without problem, 0.877 is 67% from real VTT (1.350 in bios, real vtt 1.310) btw, i have found the clunk graph is not real, they seen like provide wrong real vtt value. anantech provide correct real vtt value for dfi x48, however i have tried but still not work for quad Added on December 27, 2008, 11:51 am so the fsb limit on where for a quad on x38? http://www.clunk.org.uk/forums/hardware/32....html#post12436 btw, running 440fsb at 1.25vtt 1.28vcore Ibt passed, Prime 8 hours passed screenshot » Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... « This post has been edited by huzai: Dec 27 2008, 03:25 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
Dec 27 2008, 03:32 PM
|
|
VIP
2,510 posts Joined: Dec 2004 From: Penang Island and Bidor
|
QUOTE(hengmy @ Dec 27 2008, 11:51 AM) so the fsb limit on where for a quad on x38? |
|
|
Dec 27 2008, 04:22 PM
|
|
Senior Member
1,991 posts Joined: Jan 2007 From: Seri Kembangan
|
QUOTE(huzai @ Dec 27 2008, 03:20 PM) nope, im using it without problem, 0.877 is 67% from real VTT (1.350 in bios, real vtt 1.310) nice result, i mean the table wont work well for 450 fsb..http://www.clunk.org.uk/forums/hardware/32....html#post12436 btw, running 440fsb at 1.25vtt 1.28vcore Ibt passed, Prime 8 hours passed screenshot » Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... « about the 0.00724 in the formula there, this figure is?? and for anantech, they measured diff real vtt from clunk for your board, dunno if i see wrong QUOTE(metsatsu @ Dec 27 2008, 03:32 PM) the limitation is on x38. ya, i know, but a quad can get what fsb on x38? 450??QUOTE(OC4/3 @ Dec 27 2008, 12:55 PM) 1.5 or 1.6vcore if i recall before my p5e manage to do 500 fsb stable only on a dualcore~@heng,X38 wall is rather low but i have seen 6xxFSB on dual core from maximus extreme |
|
|
Dec 27 2008, 06:27 PM
|
|
VIP
2,510 posts Joined: Dec 2004 From: Penang Island and Bidor
|
Yah bro. Roughly 440-450. So far i havent seen anyone with x38 mobo with quad can exceed that fsb limit, especially gigabyte x38...
Added on December 27, 2008, 6:44 pmHere's the link of tomshardware review http://www.tomshardware.co.uk/Intel-X38-Gi...view-29644.html Added on December 27, 2008, 6:45 pmHere's the link of tomshardware review http://www.tomshardware.co.uk/Intel-X38-Gi...view-29644.html This post has been edited by metsatsu: Dec 27 2008, 06:45 PM |
|
|
Dec 27 2008, 10:23 PM
|
|
Junior Member
197 posts Joined: Apr 2005 From: Shah Alam
|
QUOTE(hengmy @ Dec 27 2008, 04:22 PM) nice result, i mean the table wont work well for 450 fsb.. thanks! oh for 450fsb maybe you're rightabout the 0.00724 in the formula there, this figure is?? and for anantech, they measured diff real vtt from clunk for your board, dunno if i see wrong 0.00724v = 1 for GTL 1/2 you got the link for anandtech? |
|
|
Dec 27 2008, 10:46 PM
|
|
Senior Member
1,991 posts Joined: Jan 2007 From: Seri Kembangan
|
QUOTE(huzai @ Dec 27 2008, 10:23 PM) thanks! oh for 450fsb maybe you're right here is the link0.00724v = 1 for GTL 1/2 you got the link for anandtech? http://www.anandtech.com/showdoc.aspx?i=3294&p=14 i feel the real vtt measure here more accurate, as it show same as H/W in bios i think u use this real vtt to calculate might give u a surprise? |
|
|
Dec 30 2008, 04:16 AM
|
|
Junior Member
197 posts Joined: Apr 2005 From: Shah Alam
|
QUOTE(hengmy @ Dec 27 2008, 10:46 PM) here is the link thanks bro for the link, cannot boot to windows using anandtech gtl guide lol, its not suitable for me i thinkhttp://www.anandtech.com/showdoc.aspx?i=3294&p=14 i feel the real vtt measure here more accurate, as it show same as H/W in bios i think u use this real vtt to calculate might give u a surprise? haiya, is there any real calculation for this gtl setting for dfi board? |
|
|
Dec 30 2008, 02:32 PM
|
Senior Member
1,800 posts Joined: Dec 2008 From: unknown
|
my quads at 3.4ghz ... same proccessor and motherboard with huzai T.T" , 425fsbx8= 3.4ghz at 3.12v (shown in cpu-z and bios reading) trying to get to 3.6ghz but so far seems to crash after 2-3 minits of stress test D:, with the following voltage settings
set the ram at 1:1 ratio CPU Vidd: 1.4v CPU Vidd Special Limit: Enable CPU Vidd Special Limit Add: Auto NB Core : 1.55v SB Core/CPU PLL: 1.51v FSB VTT: 1.45v RAM VDIMM: 2v GTL Ref Voltage Control : disabled (systems seems too be unstable if i enable this) CPU GTL 1/2 Ref Volt : 113 (unchangeable since i disable voltage control) CPU GLT 0/3 Ref Volt : 100 (same here) North Bridge GTL Ref Volt : 100 (same here) This post has been edited by reiben05: Dec 30 2008, 02:45 PM |
| Change to: |  0.0205sec
 0.25
 6 queries
 GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 5th December 2025 - 08:38 AM |
Quote
