maybe u want 70-200?
D40/x/D60 Thread V4, The saga continues...
D40/x/D60 Thread V4, The saga continues...
|
|
Apr 18 2009, 06:53 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
7,214 posts Joined: Oct 2006 From: Kamino |
there's no 50-200...
maybe u want 70-200? |
|
|
|
|
|
Apr 18 2009, 10:10 PM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
68 posts Joined: Nov 2008 |
|
|
|
Apr 18 2009, 11:11 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,009 posts Joined: Sep 2006 From: Shah Alam |
Where can i get D60 manual. I bought a second hand but its not include the manual. Only a simple instruction how to do this and that. I need a thick manual..help me
|
|
|
Apr 18 2009, 11:35 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
866 posts Joined: Aug 2008 |
How much will be the best deal if I'm to get it in KL?
What free gifts will be included? |
|
|
Apr 19 2009, 03:38 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,016 posts Joined: Mar 2005 From: ★MALAYSIA★ Status: Photographing |
QUOTE(imranayid @ Apr 18 2009, 10:10 PM) get the VR version..seriously it makes a difference. i tried it for quite a while now and it's much much better than the one without VR at 200mm.read this : http://www.kenrockwell.com/nikon/55-200mm-vr.htm to be honest im thinking of not selling my 55-200... happy with the closeup/macro performance.. wanna get a raynox 202 or 250 and get betttter results for macro shots.. This post has been edited by alpha_company: Apr 19 2009, 03:41 AM |
|
|
Apr 19 2009, 06:13 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
7,214 posts Joined: Oct 2006 From: Kamino |
QUOTE(alpha_company @ Apr 19 2009, 03:38 AM) get the VR version..seriously it makes a difference. i tried it for quite a while now and it's much much better than the one without VR at 200mm. @bolded : then u havent seen what a true macro lense can do... read this : http://www.kenrockwell.com/nikon/55-200mm-vr.htm to be honest im thinking of not selling my 55-200... happy with the closeup/macro performance.. wanna get a raynox 202 or 250 and get betttter results for macro shots.. |
|
|
|
|
|
Apr 19 2009, 10:18 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,114 posts Joined: Dec 2006 |
haha i agree with xandman. why? because the 55-200 cannot get as close as the kit lens even.wait till you try a 105mm
|
|
|
Apr 19 2009, 12:37 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
866 posts Joined: Aug 2008 |
Normally where do you all buy your gadgets?
I'm living in S'ban and cannot afford to always go too far to buy them. |
|
|
Apr 19 2009, 01:52 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,016 posts Joined: Mar 2005 From: ★MALAYSIA★ Status: Photographing |
QUOTE(xandman @ Apr 19 2009, 06:13 AM) @bolded : seen pics of it already lar. why ido u think t's called a "MACRO" lens if it's not better then other lenses in macro shots? yeah.. there's a lot of REAL macros on the internet la... i've seen it already. maybe u haven't seen how a true macro lens burn holes in your pockets. Added on April 19, 2009, 1:56 pm QUOTE(orenzai @ Apr 19 2009, 10:18 AM) haha i agree with xandman. why? because the 55-200 cannot get as close as the kit lens even.wait till you try a 105mm haha i dont agree with xandman. why? because i OWN and TESTED the 55-200 against the kit lens .wait till you try a 105mm ability to burn pocket holes it's not like i want to go macro kaw2.. i get raynox fine already. This post has been edited by alpha_company: Apr 19 2009, 02:05 PM |
|
|
Apr 20 2009, 10:14 AM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
85 posts Joined: Jun 2006 |
QUOTE(bonzaimy @ Apr 18 2009, 11:11 PM) Where can i get D60 manual. I bought a second hand but its not include the manual. Only a simple instruction how to do this and that. I need a thick manual..help me find this e-book from the google... "Wiley.Nikon.D60.Digital.Field.Guide.Jul.2008.eBook-DDU.pdf"this is really helpful for newbie like me... |
|
|
Apr 20 2009, 01:47 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,114 posts Joined: Dec 2006 |
QUOTE(alpha_company @ Apr 19 2009, 01:52 PM) @bolded : seen pics of it already lar. why ido u think t's called a "MACRO" lens if it's not better then other lenses in macro shots? i also own a 55-200.at 200mm, the min focusing range is 1.1m wheres for the kitlens at 55mm you can get as close as 28cm. though, the perspective of the shot is diff already yeah.. there's a lot of REAL macros on the internet la... i've seen it already. maybe u haven't seen how a true macro lens burn holes in your pockets. Added on April 19, 2009, 1:56 pm haha i dont agree with xandman. why? because i OWN and TESTED the 55-200 against the kit lens .wait till you try a 105mm ability to burn pocket holes it's not like i want to go macro kaw2.. i get raynox fine already. |
|
|
Apr 20 2009, 10:48 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,443 posts Joined: Jun 2006 From: Bandar Baru Bangi |
55-200 vr is rm1200? have the prices of lenses skyrocket? Cuz I bought my vr for 850 :/
|
|
|
Apr 20 2009, 10:51 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,016 posts Joined: Mar 2005 From: ★MALAYSIA★ Status: Photographing |
i like it at 1.1m because the bugs are less likely to fly away..hehe
|
|
|
|
|
|
Apr 21 2009, 06:16 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,114 posts Joined: Dec 2006 |
|
|
|
Apr 21 2009, 09:23 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
7,214 posts Joined: Oct 2006 From: Kamino |
|
|
|
Apr 21 2009, 05:40 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,720 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
chewlf,
do you have sample pics comparing with and without the SB600? me a newbie in dslr and just bought a d40...my next purchase plan is the SB600... thanks... QUOTE(chewlf @ Apr 17 2009, 09:26 AM) ya, I do agree with xandman. You should make use of what you have currently and try to shot more photos, then only decide what's the next lens to buy. For myself, I stick to kit lens for a year before I purchase 55-200mm and 35mm. The immediate purchase after my D40 was SB600 to compliment the indoor low light shooting and it was a good investment. The differences are huge. |
|
|
Apr 21 2009, 06:15 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,889 posts Joined: Jan 2005 From: Kelana Jaya |
|
|
|
Apr 21 2009, 06:52 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
7,214 posts Joined: Oct 2006 From: Kamino |
hahahaha...
time to get ur macro rig back? |
|
|
Apr 22 2009, 04:01 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,217 posts Joined: Nov 2007 From: Penang |
QUOTE(kevyeoh @ Apr 21 2009, 05:40 PM) chewlf, keyyeonh,do you have sample pics comparing with and without the SB600? me a newbie in dslr and just bought a d40...my next purchase plan is the SB600... thanks... I will upload some photos for you to review when have time. It won't be wrong if you go for SB600 first especially taking photo indoor. Even for outdoor portrait shooting, I also use to reduce the face shadow. |
|
|
Apr 23 2009, 12:00 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,016 posts Joined: Mar 2005 From: ★MALAYSIA★ Status: Photographing |
guys.. im thinking of getting either the famous Tamron 17-50 f/2.8 OR Sigma 17-70 f/2.8-4.5... which do u think has better image quality and better price-performance ratio?
|
|
Topic ClosedOptions
|
| Change to: | 0.0195sec
0.83
5 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 15th December 2025 - 05:39 AM |