QUOTE(Pai @ Sep 19 2009, 09:19 PM)
Think you are avoiding most of the questions, as expected. Let me clarify the question to its most basic english state for your understanding :
2. I didnt asked which is the worst or best. I asked why your "business" man would go for SW instead of the other Puchong condo? SW is the most expensive, have the least facility and located in the a traffic area so whats the main selling point here?
3. Have you rented ANY property out before? Have you rented your property to expats?
Im not sure about you, but I've been in the landlord business long enuff to know that good facilities attracts good tenants + premium rents. Its a major consideration albeit not a main one especially if one is gonna fork out a hefty 350-400psf. Honestly SW facilities are mediocre at best and is probably the worst of the 4.
3a. SW as a brand? Very interesting. Care to explain what brand equity does SW brings to its buyers?
4. U assume that there r plenty business man in Puchong, and I asked you for stats to prove your assumption. As I suspected, its PURELY your own assumption not backed with any facts whatsoever, just like the rest of your statements.
Speaking of common-sense, all good projects nomally sold out within weeks/months. Use your "common-sense" and do tell us why SW has yet to sell all its block and still not able to fully sell its existing stocks despite :
- offering 5/95 con scheme
- Various round of free makan and drinks
- Monthly adevertisment in all major newspaper.
5. Zest was a good product that is fully sold. Ealier buyer now makes 10%-15% paper gain on a fully sold project. I cant say the same for SW though.
Again u r avoiding the question. These businessman that you mentioned, why would they choose SW over other condos, DSL, Semi-D and Bungalow? Please answer the question if you can.
6. Been there and the finishing is so-so. I do like the layout of the studios though. And yes its NOT fully sold even to date.
7. Again, what is the personal preference that makes ppl want to buy SW VS any other condo in Puchong? Or r u saying that SW buyers all buy SW bcoz its expensive?
8. Your high-end definition must be wayyyyyyyyyyyyyy lower than the general standard if u think SW is a high end product. Have u seen a high-end product before? Care to share whats your definition on "high end"?
Added on September 19, 2009, 9:31 pm
I've seen Atmosfera, Zen and SW showroom, and honestly SW looks like the worst of the lot, in terms of facilities, finishing and spec. Therefore, usage of high-end to describe SW is highly debatable boss, "high-price" or expensive IMO is a more fair description.
Pai,2. I didnt asked which is the worst or best. I asked why your "business" man would go for SW instead of the other Puchong condo? SW is the most expensive, have the least facility and located in the a traffic area so whats the main selling point here?
3. Have you rented ANY property out before? Have you rented your property to expats?
Im not sure about you, but I've been in the landlord business long enuff to know that good facilities attracts good tenants + premium rents. Its a major consideration albeit not a main one especially if one is gonna fork out a hefty 350-400psf. Honestly SW facilities are mediocre at best and is probably the worst of the 4.
3a. SW as a brand? Very interesting. Care to explain what brand equity does SW brings to its buyers?
4. U assume that there r plenty business man in Puchong, and I asked you for stats to prove your assumption. As I suspected, its PURELY your own assumption not backed with any facts whatsoever, just like the rest of your statements.
Speaking of common-sense, all good projects nomally sold out within weeks/months. Use your "common-sense" and do tell us why SW has yet to sell all its block and still not able to fully sell its existing stocks despite :
- offering 5/95 con scheme
- Various round of free makan and drinks
- Monthly adevertisment in all major newspaper.
5. Zest was a good product that is fully sold. Ealier buyer now makes 10%-15% paper gain on a fully sold project. I cant say the same for SW though.
Again u r avoiding the question. These businessman that you mentioned, why would they choose SW over other condos, DSL, Semi-D and Bungalow? Please answer the question if you can.
6. Been there and the finishing is so-so. I do like the layout of the studios though. And yes its NOT fully sold even to date.
7. Again, what is the personal preference that makes ppl want to buy SW VS any other condo in Puchong? Or r u saying that SW buyers all buy SW bcoz its expensive?
8. Your high-end definition must be wayyyyyyyyyyyyyy lower than the general standard if u think SW is a high end product. Have u seen a high-end product before? Care to share whats your definition on "high end"?
Added on September 19, 2009, 9:31 pm
I've seen Atmosfera, Zen and SW showroom, and honestly SW looks like the worst of the lot, in terms of facilities, finishing and spec. Therefore, usage of high-end to describe SW is highly debatable boss, "high-price" or expensive IMO is a more fair description.
Emotion will always cloud your mind and obstruct you from seeing the obvious, disabling you from reading the simple.
Hope u understand SW is selling a condo + lifestyle, seems like u rarely go out with the younger generation and lost touch with the trends.
Since u r in the stage of
No point to retype everything here for all the answered questions, but i just leave it to the genuine interested party to judge the following:
1. Would a goodwill of a developer has any bearing in term of properties' potential and likelihood of complete VP in time? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q4nuIyPHnFM
2. Are there plenty or lacking of businessman in Puchong?
3. Is paper gain = materialized profit?
4. Is SW different from Zest, Zen... in term of concept and lifestyle? Is yes, would there be a market differentiation?
5. Selling fast = Good? have you seen any exception?
6. Can all businessman afford a Bungalow or Semi D?
7. Is personal preference one of the contributing factor in one's decision?
8. Is "expensive" an illusion subject to affordability, with a little bit of personal preference?
9. Is "high End" subject to relativity?
10. Comparing Rolex and B&R, Rolex is definitely more practical, why some younger generation opts for B&R given the same price tag?
11. Can the above questions be answered by mere common sense?
12. Would those in ZEST, Zen...face the traffic jam? Zen may need to use the same highway to reach home...
AND this one for Pai,
13. Have you rented ANY property out before? Have you rented your property to expats? U said u are in this busibess looooooooooong enough.. Really, how do i verify it is your imagination, self inflation, or the least possible fact? r u showing us some proof or.....
Given you "outstanding" record in Zest, i'm not sure whether u can read or not...Did you enjoy the youtube link, in which you rubbished all the claims?
And i'm sure you bought Zen, judging from your proposition of facilities, ALL expat will rush to Zen, so 1 unit, i floor or 1 block you bought?
Oops, top up Qs:-
14. Is Chuah Xui Cheng always right? Bonus question, answer is NO, a BIG NO
15. Is Pai always right? If Yes, 15.1 was he right in rubbishing all the claims against Zest's dev, 15.2 and asking everyone to wait for minimum a year for Zest, and he bought one in 6 months?
This post has been edited by chuah xui cheng: Sep 19 2009, 11:31 PM
Sep 19 2009, 10:49 PM

Quote
0.0324sec
0.33
6 queries
GZIP Disabled