Intel Celeron (E1XXX) & Pentium Dual Core E2XXX, Discussion & Compilation [v2]
|
|
 Mar 23 2008, 12:45 AM
|
 
Senior Member
3,119 posts Joined: May 2007 From: Home  
|
QUOTE(joe_star @ Mar 23 2008, 12:42 AM) hmmm......would be interested to see sum1 put that to the test i have done it myself, and the results are  P4 640 @ 3.2Ghz (200*16) = 40+ seconds.. Dual Core e2140 @ 3.2Ghz (400*8) = 18+ seconds.... ill get some screenies tomorrow morning and post it here.. |
|
|
|
|
|
Mar 23 2008, 12:45 AM
|
Senior Member
1,743 posts Joined: Jul 2006 From: Shah Alam 
|
dun hv the 945 chipset mobo..if i wanna try the lowest chipset i'll try will be the 965p...
|
|
|
Mar 23 2008, 12:46 AM
|
Senior Member
2,910 posts Joined: Oct 2007 From: Melaka  
|
QUOTE(a1098113 @ Mar 23 2008, 12:41 AM) older generation only suffices on the heat dissipation and the architecture of the processor. But when it comes to dead basic Pi calculations, this things dont matter IMHO. The Fsb speed rules. maybe intel scare if all e2xxx series can overclock very well,then no ppl buy their high end proc ma,so now they 'decrease' the overclockability of new e2xxx series lo Added on March 23, 2008, 12:42 amand i am trying to put the point to you that FSB does play a significant role in benchmarking rather than overall speed.  |
|
|
Mar 23 2008, 12:48 AM
|
 
Elite
8,545 posts Joined: Aug 2006 From: 224.0.0.6
|
QUOTE(a1098113 @ Mar 23 2008, 12:45 AM) i have done it myself, and the results are That comparison not very approriate as two different achictetures IMO.P4 640 @ 3.2Ghz (200*16) = 40+ seconds.. Dual Core e2140 @ 3.2Ghz (400*8) = 18+ seconds.... ill get some screenies tomorrow morning and post it here.. -pWs- |
|
|
Mar 23 2008, 12:48 AM
|
|
Senior Member
2,910 posts Joined: Oct 2007 From: Melaka
|
QUOTE(heizad @ Mar 23 2008, 12:45 AM) dun hv the 945 chipset mobo..if i wanna try the lowest chipset i'll try will be the 965p... no money ma brother,i sell out my socket 478 system and top up some money to change to 775 de leh  |
|
|
Mar 23 2008, 12:55 AM
|
|
Senior Member
3,119 posts Joined: May 2007 From: Home
|
QUOTE(-pWs- @ Mar 23 2008, 12:48 AM) That comparison not very approriate as two different achictetures IMO. i am not trying to compare on architectures doink... i am only comparing on FSB speeds... too bad there aint any one here who would wanna compare 333*9 to a 375*8 on same rams, same processors and same dividers... if there is, please do post up. -pWs- QUOTE older generation only suffices on the heat dissipation and the architecture of the processor. But when it comes to dead basic Pi calculations, this things dont matter IMHO. The Fsb speed rules read this first liao... then comment. |
|
|
|
|
|
Mar 23 2008, 12:55 AM
|
|
Senior Member
1,743 posts Joined: Jul 2006 From: Shah Alam
|
nvm bro...slowly upgrade
|
|
|
Mar 23 2008, 12:55 AM
|
Senior Member
1,991 posts Joined: Jan 2007 From: Seri Kembangan
|
QUOTE(-pWs- @ Mar 23 2008, 12:48 AM) That comparison not very approriate as two different architectures IMO. yaya.. i think so, as the new architectures can calculate more faster then older...-pWs- |
|
|
Mar 23 2008, 12:57 AM
|
|
Elite
8,545 posts Joined: Aug 2006 From: 224.0.0.6
|
QUOTE(a1098113 @ Mar 23 2008, 12:55 AM) i am not trying to compare on architectures doink... i am only comparing on FSB speeds... too bad there aint any one here who would wanna compare 333*9 to a 375*8 on same rams, same processors and same dividers... if there is, please do post up. Oh..i see  Normally how much max Vcore safe for 24/7 usage?? Or depend on temp?? -pWs- |
|
|
Mar 23 2008, 12:57 AM
|
|
Senior Member
2,910 posts Joined: Oct 2007 From: Melaka
|
QUOTE(heizad @ Mar 23 2008, 12:55 AM) nvm bro...slowly upgrade i now plan to do tis :e2160 asus 945gc mobo 2 x 1 gb kingston ddr2 667 hynix chip tats all,i only top up about rm 100 from socket 478 to tis |
|
|
Mar 23 2008, 12:58 AM
|
|
Senior Member
3,119 posts Joined: May 2007 From: Home
|
ok then we will put to test, 400*8 and 355*9 then... anyone.. ill post up a screenie on 400*8 soon and make a comparison to 355*9, we will see a massive difference in times.
|
|
|
Mar 23 2008, 12:58 AM
|
|
Senior Member
1,991 posts Joined: Jan 2007 From: Seri Kembangan
|
i am also want to know what is the safe vcore for an intel processor..
|
|
|
Mar 23 2008, 12:59 AM
|
|
Senior Member
3,119 posts Joined: May 2007 From: Home
|
anything below 1.46V should be safe IMHO.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mar 23 2008, 01:04 AM
|
Senior Member
3,175 posts Joined: May 2006
|
QUOTE(hengmy @ Mar 23 2008, 12:58 AM) i am also want to know what is the safe vcore for an intel processor.. safe means the lower the better  anyway, intel warranties their processor up to 1.50v for e2xxx series |
|
|
Mar 23 2008, 01:08 AM
|
|
Senior Member
3,119 posts Joined: May 2007 From: Home
|
QUOTE(bryanyeo87 @ Mar 23 2008, 01:04 AM) safe means the lower the better eh i thought it was 1.7V... or is it another series... that they allow it.. coz u sent me an attached mail remember...anyway, intel warranties their processor up to 1.50v for e2xxx series Added on March 23, 2008, 1:09 amhmm then i am sorry fellas, its 1.5V then  This post has been edited by a1098113: Mar 23 2008, 01:09 AM |
|
|
Mar 23 2008, 01:15 AM
|
|
Senior Member
1,991 posts Joined: Jan 2007 From: Seri Kembangan
|
QUOTE(bryanyeo87 @ Mar 23 2008, 01:04 AM) safe means the lower the better wow.. i never know that.. thank for this info bro.. then 1.5v should be safe play for e2xxx series processor then..anyway, intel warranties their processor up to 1.50v for e2xxx series |
|
|
Mar 23 2008, 01:22 AM
|
|
Senior Member
1,743 posts Joined: Jul 2006 From: Shah Alam
|
haha...i oso just knew bout the warranty
|
|
|
Mar 23 2008, 01:24 AM
|
Senior Member
1,810 posts Joined: Mar 2007
|
Ok....so its not an FSB wall of the proc. Just tried with my 9X multi and i raised it to FSB425(x9=3.825ghz) and the comp would boot and enter bios. But the moment i set it to 8X, the comp always hangs after rebooting. Any sifus plz advice. Tq Tq Tq
|
|
|
Mar 23 2008, 01:36 AM
|
Senior Member
673 posts Joined: Dec 2007
|
hard to achieved 3.7ghz with 667 ram =.="
will keep try on it.. now running 3.2ghz on stock 28c idle with no thermal paste. |
|
|
Mar 23 2008, 01:37 AM
|
|
Senior Member
1,991 posts Joined: Jan 2007 From: Seri Kembangan
|
QUOTE(joe_star @ Mar 23 2008, 01:24 AM) Ok....so its not an FSB wall of the proc. Just tried with my 9X multi and i raised it to FSB425(x9=3.825ghz) and the comp would boot and enter bios. But the moment i set it to 8X, the comp always hangs after rebooting. Any sifus plz advice. Tq Tq Tq wow.. so dare boot up at speed up to 3.8xx on air cooling.. what is vcore for that? |
| Change to: |  0.0262sec
 0.51
 6 queries
 GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 14th December 2025 - 10:22 PM |
Quote