Just found that thread. Tenkiu a lot

Hahahaha...you are right

-pWs-

not 1.7v.. dont dare to do it.. just tried 1.6v only max.. but with 3.5ghz it can be stable at 1.55v, just the temp is too terible..

will try suicide oc too

ouchies... maybe you would wanna try WC?

---

Added on March 23, 2008, 12:11 amnot recommending that, but hey, its your procs... soooo have fun

This post has been edited by a1098113: Mar 23 2008, 12:11 AM

Without, your E2160 totally outrun mine

yeah, but well, its seriously up to luck if all your procs are M0 and perform not well...

yeah..like me...still searching the best option or clock for my e2160..haha...dun wanna stuck @3.0GHz oni...

I downclocked my E2160

is it 356x9 is more easier to get 3.2ghz compare to 400x8? or it is the same?

I think 355x9 easier...

tougher to get 400*8 instead.

if like tat is it can get 355x9 at 3.2 at lower voltage? coz i am using 400x8 now.. i tot is the same.

Different, because the FSB and Multiplier affect quite alot...

not really, maybe the voltages are the same coz its overall the amount of speed that you attain.. but to reach 400Mhz on the fsb is generally tougher than playing with 355Mhz due to technical straps.

i tried 356*9 n it's easier rather than trying for 400*8...

u will have faster SP1M readings with 400*8 rather than 356*9 though its 3.2Ghz in general. Its all up to the speed of the FSB For a test, try running a p4 proc which runs at 3.2Ghz (200*16) compared to a 3.2Ghz e2140 (400*8), a huge diff.

but p4 ad old generation tech, so cant compare like tat i think...

older generation only suffices on the heat dissipation and the architecture of the processor. But when it comes to dead basic Pi calculations, this things dont matter IMHO. The Fsb speed rules.

---

Added on March 23, 2008, 12:42 amand i am trying to put the point to you that FSB does play a significant role in benchmarking rather than overall speed.

This post has been edited by a1098113: Mar 23 2008, 12:42 AM

hmmm......would be interested to see sum1 put that to the test

maybe is becoz ur is close to 2008 ,so consider new bacth,my fren bought a 2007 oso,but i forgot the month,is tall heatsink one,and today i bought a 2008 's,is thin heatsink one, anybody here tried overclock e2160 or e2140 with 945gc chipset ? wat is the highest clock u get ? i only see 2.0ghz is the highest with 945gc b4

This post has been edited by xk2: Mar 23 2008, 12:44 AM