i will go for keith farmer lo for P2...

haha...second u...


ya,if u wan to fill achieved,u have to..
but actually u can submit by filling to be achieved 1st..

then u can slowly fill up ur tdm and submit accordingly ..
coz tdm no deadline der..jus annual return got..

Ha Ha, you should lo, I dun like Mc Orange except some paper no choice.

landing a job in big4 is not diffiulct...

OBU degree, big4 won't give u "Degree holder" salary ....

dilemma here. don't know should take P4 or P6 (together with P5) as optional paper next sitting. i had attempted 3.2 in Dec 06 sitting but i failed terribly.

if i take P4 i would attend Chan Tze Kang's class as i have confidence in him.

if i take P6 i would attend Low Chin Ann's class as i think there's not many options available for next sitting.

anyone has taken P4 and P6 (or either one) previously? mind to give me some advice? i personally not too much interested in P6 lo cause it involves a lot of memory works. correct me if i'm wrong.

same here...i am also in a dillemma as to what optional ppr shd i take...p4 is not an option as im x rly good in forex...leaving me with p5,p6 n p7...tinking of taking p6 n p7...but then ppl say p5 was easier to pass...but when i look at the dec 07 sitting i went ...1st question alreadi involves a heavy calculation...then have to analyse on them summore...so all u senior ppl out thr...help us to decide pls lol

i also have dilemma taking p5 or p7

---

Added on December 17, 2007, 2:38 pmDo u have any ideas about P2? which lecturer is better to take ? There are so many options, pls help me, i don't know how to choose. cry.............liao


This post has been edited by Serenekhoo: Dec 17 2007, 02:38 PM

Chan Tze Kang- wer he teach?

P1-?
p2-joe fang
p3- parmindar? anyone attended his p3? how his approach?
p4-daniel ho ? chan tze kang?
p6-low chin ann? or chow chee yan?

Pls advice, tq ^^

---

Added on December 17, 2007, 4:50 pmHi, wna ask, how parmindar approach for p1 and p3 last sitting? Might not go sunway, still back to kasturi.... so plan to take up p1,2,3,4,6 class.... any suggestion? By the way wat class u plan to go?

This post has been edited by Zoeee: Dec 17 2007, 04:50 PM

P1 - Philip Woo (I think he is one of the best P1 lecturer in KL, better go to register fast to avoid no place, last sitting full house)

P2 - Joe Fang or Keith Farmer (But I will go to Keith Farmer, cos know that his exam technique very good)

P3 - Parmindar (He is very good in IT/IS topic and can teach u how to apply IT/IS in Value Chain, Portal
5 forces. For Mgmt part, he is good oso. He do his own answer for all the PYQ to make student more easy to read and understand, cos examiner answer was very confuse to read)

P4 - Daniel Ho (never attend b4, but a lot ppl said he is very good)

P6 - Chow Chee Yan (experience lecturer but very expensive. If CKF teach IRC, then better go cos CKF exam technique very good)

This post has been edited by carlosandy: Dec 17 2007, 04:56 PM

thank you very much

p1- philip woo, last sitting i went for F8, good but seem x suit my learning style...

p2- used to be joe fang student for F5... duno cahnge to keith framer can or not

p3- ok...will go for parmindar

p4- wait ftms....duno daniel ho still teach or not

p5- how bout alan yeo?...

For P1, I think Sheila is good oso, but her notes too detail until we can't finish study. If compare Sheila with Philip Woo, I personally prefer Philip Woo cos he make student more understanding. But since u said the seem x suit ur learning, then may be u go for Sheila lah!

For P2, I think no problem if u change to Keith Farmer cos the exam style in P2 will be difference from F5.

For P5, my friend attend Alan Yeo class b4. Compare with CKF and Chow Chee Yan, Alan is not so good.

oooo...ic.... thx for the advice... ^-^

p1- never attend shiela, agreed with u, philip more story to tell n understanding...

p2-mayb i change to keith farmer

p5- then no choice, maybe chow chee yan...mc orange....wah....mustb expensive

How about Ms kok who teach P5 in sunwsay college, i think she is good also. Got any opinion ?

wah. u taking 5 papers ??

for p2, last time i got see his notes, quite excellent.

for p1 - i took sheila's class for last sitting... wat i can say is the technique that she taught on how to understand the question requirement is good, the answer that she provided is easier to understand and the way to identify the dilemma of case study is good too.
for p4 - i heard Daniel Ho is the best n he is still teaching this sitting in ftms
for p5 - adv performance mgt... is better to choose chow kim tai in mcorange for this sitting
p6 - i had taken chow chee yen class last sitting for dec'07 exam... actually he is not bad but he will only cover those topic that he spotted in IRC..means it is risky coz for dec'07 sitting exam... those topic spotted by him n ckf didn't come out... one more thing is he is always late to the class (if the class is at 10am, he reached by 10.30am so the class will be extended til 5.30pm)

in my opinion,P6 knowledge is the most useful,it can help u in your exam and real life..but it is not easy as richard thornton now more emphasize on writing...roy_pck,i dont think tax need a lot of memory work coz u have to understand the principle in order to apply flexibly,purely memorise wont help u pass the exam..coz u don forget this is Part 3 papers...

For P4,i think it is quite ok also provided u like finance la..daniel ho has his unique technique in delivering the lecture to students..


I think Keith is not bad...as long as u can tahan his slang..other thing shd be ok...
i like his note and exam technique and i would say i can pass also becoz of him...

ya,daniel is not bad..
ckf no teach normal class,so i think other option will be siva nair or chow chee yan lo..
for the irc,i think ckf will conduct,but looking now so many colleges make student compulsory sign up the revision,if no demand for his irc,i think he might not conduct lo...

yes,i saw daniel name in ftms...

So riskly to attend his P6 class ah! Means that even normal class, he also didn't teach the whole syllabus?

Then, study tis paper for what? Just go for exam? Paid more fees, but didn't cover whole syllabus. Mc Orange betul-betul MAKAN ORANG oh!

This post has been edited by carlosandy: Dec 17 2007, 10:33 PM

dat means there is different salary for degree holder and acca holder??? can any1 tell da differences?

---

Added on December 17, 2007, 11:20 pmany1 hv details bout CKF timetable and da fees?

This post has been edited by formulaoag: Dec 17 2007, 11:20 PM

Hi Zoe, i've only attended Parmindar's 1st semester. I find his approach interesting, the way he teaches emphasise on the key points & he'll say them out loud, for sure this'll hit them into your head clearly. Personally a lecturer that won't make you feel a theory paper is boring, amazing. At first I thought his approach was a bit exaggerating, thought that he could only do the talking & nothing more to persuade the students, but no, I felt that he suit my style of enjoying a theory paper.

Hmm, Sunway, perhaps P2 but i'm sure it'll be really crowded... Why? Because it's Ms. Menon I guess. Well, I suppose I might give Keith Farmer a try, as P2 has a lot more theory than F7. P1, probably Philip Woo the one who's being considered best, but I ain't so sure, the classes will be twice per month & on Sundays. Tough one really, maybe I'll try elsewhere. What do you think?

Planning to take F6, P3 first. Perhaps I'll decide upon whether to take P1 & P2 as well. Enjoying your holidays back in hometown yea, Zoe? Oh... forgotten to ask for your contact (mobile & MSN) during revision days. PM me yea. Haha!

anyone taking P1 with low chin ann b4 this ? how's it ?

any comment on Philip Woo's teaching style? will u feel bored in his class? im scared of having long hours class.
Sheila vs Philip , who would u recommend?
there's so much difference between fees of ksa n mcO . 1110 vs 780 .

About P2 , Keith Farmer or Joe Fang ?