QUOTE(littlefire @ Aug 21 2024, 12:05 PM)
BTW, back to basic do you know that car safety got 2 category Active & Passive?
Go do research about this 2. Both are equally need to be good. Nowadays a lot of car manufacturer will try to proof their passive safety is good, but do you know active safety the one that prevents accident also equally or more important as it safe time, hassle and money?
Go dig more further those Mazda Active safety test recently, especially small SUV & Automatic emergency braking. These info usually are not shared out.
Bro, Google already exist in this world for over 10 years already....no need to wait for your turn to explain what is passive and active car safety features la, not enough to show off, lol.
Me and other forumers here are just sharing same thought with you, your way of thinking is too narrow, from what we can see on how you draw conclusion on the matter. You saw or heard the workshop got many claim on cx30 then you think it's active features failed because it can't prevent accident. And even claim it's torsion beam might contribute to accident....WTF, lol. Yet there are so many factors that can contribute to a car accident. Can I said BMW got problem also since so many BM crashed on the road every year? Last year my friend's younger brother crashed his 330 due to the tyre skidded in heavy rain, as he drove too fast, so was the car got problem? Or the otak got problem? Unless you and your friend in charge for all claims of accidents and have ample data size. Otherwise your statements are just hear say.
Some more cx30 got high spec and low spec, the low specs don't have smart braking features that can prevent collision. All cx30 that were sent to the workshop of your friend are full specs version?
Just to clarify, uncle only have one civic and crv at home. No mazda