Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Bump Topic Topic Closed RSS Feed

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

Unifi Official TM UniFi High Speed Broadband Thread V42, READ 1ST PAGE FOR RELEVANT WIFI INFO!

views
     
wallance0113
post Jul 4 2024, 01:37 AM

New Member
*
Junior Member
12 posts

Joined: Jan 2022
QUOTE(sHawTY @ Jul 4 2024, 12:35 AM)
Unifi down in Subang Jaya?

EDIT:
Yes, it appears there's an ongoing issue with Unifi in Subang Jaya. I just spoke with their live chat support, and they mentioned there will be intermittent disconnections until 6 AM due to scheduled upgrades they're working on.
*
Currently is down. About 5 minutes ago 1:35

back to online as of 1:45

This post has been edited by wallance0113: Jul 4 2024, 01:45 AM
vkashin
post Jul 4 2024, 11:24 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
335 posts

Joined: Dec 2005


QUOTE(xjoshualaw29 @ Jul 2 2024, 02:30 PM)
Hi,

Just went to TMpoint to terminate my Unifi and they said new Stay with Unifi promo started yesterday.

1Gbps for RM159/mth 6 month free bill.

With the bad routing, every night... Imma come back to Unifi once it is better. Now on Maxis fiber for 2 years and will see any improvement by then
*
Hi. Just wondering, to trigger this offer, is it compulsory to have application to Maxis or CelcomDigi Fiber first? or can just walk in to TMPoint to request for it? thanks
xHj09
post Jul 4 2024, 12:17 PM

Your Friendly Neighborhood
******
Senior Member
1,614 posts

Joined: Apr 2010


Down at cheras again?

More than 30 mins already.. working from home. Tough…
mikey8811
post Jul 4 2024, 01:59 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
125 posts

Joined: Jul 2008


Hi

With regards to the UOB promo for Unifi users with RM 388 cash reward, has everyone who applied for the account gotten their RM 388? If so, when did they receive it?

I applied early April and fulfilled all the conditions. However, I have yet to receive anything. I thought the funds were meant to be credited one month after the account opening date.

Thanks
xHj09
post Jul 4 2024, 04:24 PM

Your Friendly Neighborhood
******
Senior Member
1,614 posts

Joined: Apr 2010


QUOTE(xHj09 @ Jul 4 2024, 12:17 PM)
Down at cheras again?

More than 30 mins already.. working from home. Tough…
*
seems like not related to area.

LOS.. not sure if caused by solar installation yesterday coz the solar wiring macam similar place with fibre line . but then again if caused by it, should've stopped functioning yesterday instead.. suddenly 11:30am no longer working.

so hard to contact celcomdigi now. within 72h sweat.gif
bugipunch
post Jul 4 2024, 05:45 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
172 posts

Joined: Jul 2021
QUOTE(xHj09 @ Jul 4 2024, 12:17 PM)
Down at cheras again?

More than 30 mins already.. working from home. Tough…
*
celcom also have this issue? The recent downtime from tm all lights working just ppoe error.
blacktubi
post Jul 4 2024, 05:50 PM

-
Group Icon
Elite
8,416 posts

Joined: Jul 2008

QUOTE(bugipunch @ Jul 4 2024, 05:45 PM)
celcom also have this issue? The recent downtime from tm all lights working just ppoe error.
*
All telco on TM infra using TM PPPOE server


xjoshualaw29
post Jul 4 2024, 08:12 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
304 posts

Joined: Aug 2018


QUOTE(vkashin @ Jul 4 2024, 11:24 AM)
Hi. Just wondering, to trigger this offer, is it compulsory to have application to Maxis or CelcomDigi Fiber first? or can just walk in to TMPoint to request for it? thanks
*
Not necessary to have application for other ISPs as it is more to keep their existing customers. It is targeted to those out of contract customers.

For your case, you can walk in to enquire it if you're out of contract.
xCryptik
post Jul 4 2024, 10:01 PM

On my way
****
Junior Member
584 posts

Joined: May 2013
QUOTE(mikey8811 @ Jul 4 2024, 02:59 PM)
Hi

With regards to the UOB promo for Unifi users with RM 388 cash reward, has everyone who applied for the account gotten their RM 388? If so, when did they receive it?

I applied early April and fulfilled all the conditions. However, I have yet to receive anything. I thought the funds were meant to be credited one month after the account opening date.

Thanks
*
Check with UOB cs for this one.
evilhomura89
post Jul 4 2024, 11:00 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
5,886 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: BM


QUOTE(dev/numb @ Jul 3 2024, 11:04 PM)
It was very weird. I was streaming football on my iPad using a VPN connected to a SG server and everything seemed normal, but my phone (not connected to VPN)  suddenly gave a notification saying it couldn’t connect to my DNS provider (NextDNS). After doing some tests, I found that I couldn’t connect to NextDNS (the service wasn’t down because it worked fine on 5G data) but Cloudflare DNS was working. Pinging some VPN servers in SG showed that connections to DataPacket servers were fine while M247 servers all couldn’t connect.
*
I'm getting the same error almost every night for nextdns as well
Kadaj
post Jul 5 2024, 12:29 AM

On my way
****
Junior Member
586 posts

Joined: Mar 2006
QUOTE(evilhomura89 @ Jul 4 2024, 11:00 PM)
I'm getting the same error almost every night for nextdns as well
*
I think i saw someone mention about google and cloudflare dns disruption at midnight before.
Now it's nextdns.

I think the current gov tend to more surveillance and censorship about internet.
Something fishy happening?
kwss
post Jul 5 2024, 01:35 AM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,208 posts

Joined: Aug 2018
TM is having congestion issue at the customer edge and is cheating their speedtest. There is also congestion with TM-Equinix.
Here is a test I did at 10:30pm and 12:30am. Test done between my home and Oracle Cloud Singapore, using non-burstable instance (aka they are expensive but give me full CPU and 2 Gbps network performance).

Baseline at 10:30pm
1.9 Gbps locally in Singapore
https://www.speedtest.net/result/c/d30796bb...6a-6c218b1c6532

2 Gbps to Telekom Malaysia
https://www.speedtest.net/result/c/470331b9...6c-748b4a243310

Baseline at 12:30am
1.9 Gbps locally in Singapore
https://www.speedtest.net/result/c/9105b19a...40-c09e0e475ceb

1.9 Gbps to Telekom Malaysia
https://www.speedtest.net/result/c/8030bef7...9d-1473cff9b7d9

My own speedtest will max out at 800 Mbps / 200 Mbps every single time (using both speedtest.net and ipv6.speedtest.net). I am sure a lot of people have the same experience.

IPv4 Traceroute is the same during both time.
Oracle Cloud to my home
CODE

traceroute to <domain censored> (115.134.181.60), 30 hops max, 60 byte packets
1  140.91.232.46 (140.91.232.46)  0.162 ms 140.91.232.50 (140.91.232.50)  0.136 ms 140.91.232.7 (140.91.232.7)  0.198 ms
2  31898.sgw.equinix.com (27.111.229.44)  1.088 ms  0.792 ms  1.068 ms
3  6939.sgw.equinix.com (27.111.228.81)  25.688 ms * *
4  telekom-malaysia-inc.e0-71.core2.sin1.he.net (74.82.46.50)  2.270 ms  2.247 ms  2.265 ms
5  * * *
6  115.134.181.60 (115.134.181.60)  11.123 ms  14.259 ms  14.256 ms


My home to Oracle Cloud
CODE

traceroute to <domain censored> (168.138.188.163), 30 hops max, 60 byte packets
1  _gateway (192.168.88.1)  0.255 ms  0.232 ms  0.506 ms
2  115.134.191.254 (115.134.191.254)  7.592 ms  7.578 ms  7.564 ms
3  10.55.49.99 (10.55.49.99)  12.407 ms  12.424 ms  12.378 ms
4  10.55.107.93 (10.55.107.93)  9.530 ms 10.55.39.197 (10.55.39.197)  8.166 ms 10.55.107.95 (10.55.107.95)  9.501 ms
5  10.55.100.54 (10.55.100.54)  11.966 ms  11.968 ms  11.908 ms
6  * * *
7  140.91.232.23 (140.91.232.23)  14.586 ms 140.91.232.19 (140.91.232.19)  13.581 ms 140.91.232.31 (140.91.232.31)  14.527 ms
8  * 168.138.188.163 (168.138.188.163)  17.556 ms  17.533 ms


IPv6 Traceroute is also the same during both time.
Oracle Cloud to my home
CODE

traceroute to <domain censored> (2001:e68:5427:3c12:164:5ba5:d348:18dd), 30 hops max, 80 byte packets
1  2603:c000:1100::8c5b:e82e (2603:c000:1100::8c5b:e82e)  0.172 ms 2603:c000:1100::8c5b:e80c (2603:c000:1100::8c5b:e80c)  0.142 ms 2603:c000:1100::8c5b:e82c (2603:c000:1100::8c5b:e82c)  0.122 ms
2  31898.sgw.equinix.com (2001:de8:4::3:1898:1)  0.880 ms  3.299 ms  3.257 ms
3  2001:de8:4::4788:3 (2001:de8:4::4788:3)  2.787 ms  2.799 ms  2.749 ms
4  2001:e68:5427:3c12::1 (2001:e68:5427:3c12::1)  11.058 ms  11.036 ms  10.976 ms
5  2001:e68:5427:3c12:164:5ba5:d348:18dd (2001:e68:5427:3c12:164:5ba5:d348:18dd)  10.866 ms  19.580 ms  19.567 ms


My home to Oracle Cloud
CODE

traceroute to <domain censored> (2603:c024:4512:ef00:3a30:bdcb:ccd9:3e7a), 30 hops max, 80 byte packets
1  2001:e68:5427:3c12::1 (2001:e68:5427:3c12::1)  0.220 ms  0.334 ms  0.381 ms
2  2001:e68:402c:8001::6c (2001:e68:402c:8001::6c)  7.030 ms  7.013 ms  7.673 ms
3  2001:e68::b:4011 (2001:e68::b:4011)  12.609 ms  12.592 ms  12.577 ms
4  2001:c10:80:2::615 (2001:c10:80:2::615)  15.260 ms  15.244 ms  14.782 ms
5  2001:c10:80:2::6be (2001:c10:80:2::6be)  25.246 ms  14.446 ms  14.448 ms
6  2001:c10:80:2::2bd (2001:c10:80:2::2bd)  14.689 ms 2001:c10:80:2::60d (2001:c10:80:2::60d)  10.629 ms 2001:c10:80:2::2bd (2001:c10:80:2::2bd)  12.199 ms
7  2603:c000:1100::8c5b:e812 (2603:c000:1100::8c5b:e812)  14.492 ms 2603:c000:1100::8c5b:e816 (2603:c000:1100::8c5b:e816)  10.595 ms 2603:c000:1100::8c5b:e815 (2603:c000:1100::8c5b:e815)  14.187 ms
8  * 2603:c024:4512:ef00:3a30:bdcb:ccd9:3e7a (2603:c024:4512:ef00:3a30:bdcb:ccd9:3e7a)  14.043 ms  14.020 ms


As can be seen above for IPv6 connection, Oracle exchange traffic directly with TM inside Equinix.
For IPv4, traffic is offloaded to Hurricane Electric inside Equinix, then transit to TM.
Hint: You can know this from XXXXX.sgw.equinix.com. XXXXX is the AS number of the egress peer. This naming convention is specific to Equinix and does not necessary apply to other IXP.

Actual performance at 10:30pm
IPv4
CODE

Reverse mode, remote host <domain censored> is sending
[  5] local 192.168.88.13 port 36194 connected to 168.138.188.163 port 65535
[ ID] Interval           Transfer     Bitrate
[  5]   0.00-1.00   sec  4.35 MBytes  36.5 Mbits/sec                  
[  5]   1.00-2.00   sec  13.4 MBytes   112 Mbits/sec                  
[  5]   2.00-3.00   sec  17.5 MBytes   147 Mbits/sec                  
[  5]   3.00-4.00   sec  12.6 MBytes   106 Mbits/sec                  
[  5]   4.00-5.00   sec  12.9 MBytes   108 Mbits/sec                  
[  5]   5.00-6.00   sec  13.9 MBytes   116 Mbits/sec                  
[  5]   6.00-7.00   sec  17.8 MBytes   149 Mbits/sec                  
[  5]   7.00-8.00   sec  13.5 MBytes   114 Mbits/sec                  
[  5]   8.00-9.00   sec  12.4 MBytes   104 Mbits/sec                  
[  5]   9.00-10.00  sec  17.8 MBytes   150 Mbits/sec                  
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
[ ID] Interval           Transfer     Bitrate         Retr
[  5]   0.00-10.08  sec   139 MBytes   116 Mbits/sec  10334             sender
[  5]   0.00-10.00  sec   136 MBytes   114 Mbits/sec                  receiver


IPv6
CODE

Reverse mode, remote host <domain censored> is sending
[  5] local 2001:e68:5427:3c12:164:5ba5:d348:18dd port 35422 connected to 2603:c024:4512:ef00:3a30:bdcb:ccd9:3e7a port 65535
[ ID] Interval           Transfer     Bitrate
[  5]   0.00-1.00   sec  29.1 MBytes   244 Mbits/sec                  
[  5]   1.00-2.00   sec  35.4 MBytes   297 Mbits/sec                  
[  5]   2.00-3.00   sec  33.2 MBytes   279 Mbits/sec                  
[  5]   3.00-4.00   sec  34.9 MBytes   293 Mbits/sec                  
[  5]   4.00-5.00   sec  33.5 MBytes   281 Mbits/sec                  
[  5]   5.00-6.00   sec  34.3 MBytes   288 Mbits/sec                  
[  5]   6.00-7.00   sec  34.1 MBytes   286 Mbits/sec                  
[  5]   7.00-8.00   sec  34.8 MBytes   292 Mbits/sec                  
[  5]   8.00-9.00   sec  33.5 MBytes   281 Mbits/sec                  
[  5]   9.00-10.00  sec  34.4 MBytes   289 Mbits/sec                  
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
[ ID] Interval           Transfer     Bitrate         Retr
[  5]   0.00-10.02  sec   340 MBytes   285 Mbits/sec  13239             sender
[  5]   0.00-10.00  sec   337 MBytes   283 Mbits/sec                  receiver


From here you can see IPv6 is actually 2.5x faster when Oracle-TM directly exchange traffic inside Equinix.

Actual performance at 12:30am
IPv4
CODE

Reverse mode, remote host <domain censored> is sending
[  5] local 192.168.88.13 port 36554 connected to 168.138.188.163 port 65535
[ ID] Interval           Transfer     Bitrate
[  5]   0.00-1.00   sec  83.4 MBytes   699 Mbits/sec                  
[  5]   1.00-2.00   sec  95.3 MBytes   799 Mbits/sec                  
[  5]   2.00-3.00   sec  92.7 MBytes   778 Mbits/sec                  
[  5]   3.00-4.00   sec  93.3 MBytes   783 Mbits/sec                  
[  5]   4.00-5.00   sec  91.6 MBytes   768 Mbits/sec                  
[  5]   5.00-6.00   sec  89.7 MBytes   752 Mbits/sec                  
[  5]   6.00-7.00   sec  93.2 MBytes   782 Mbits/sec                  
[  5]   7.00-8.00   sec  92.4 MBytes   775 Mbits/sec                  
[  5]   8.00-9.00   sec  90.1 MBytes   756 Mbits/sec                  
[  5]   9.00-10.00  sec  93.3 MBytes   783 Mbits/sec                  
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
[ ID] Interval           Transfer     Bitrate         Retr
[  5]   0.00-10.02  sec   918 MBytes   769 Mbits/sec  46250             sender
[  5]   0.00-10.00  sec   915 MBytes   767 Mbits/sec                  receiver


IPv6
CODE

Reverse mode, remote host <domain censored> is sending
[  5] local 2001:e68:5427:3c12:164:5ba5:d348:18dd port 48856 connected to 2603:c024:4512:ef00:3a30:bdcb:ccd9:3e7a port 65535
[ ID] Interval           Transfer     Bitrate
[  5]   0.00-1.00   sec  31.3 MBytes   263 Mbits/sec                  
[  5]   1.00-2.00   sec  34.9 MBytes   292 Mbits/sec                  
[  5]   2.00-3.00   sec  34.8 MBytes   292 Mbits/sec                  
[  5]   3.00-4.00   sec  35.4 MBytes   297 Mbits/sec                  
[  5]   4.00-5.00   sec  33.9 MBytes   284 Mbits/sec                  
[  5]   5.00-6.00   sec  33.7 MBytes   283 Mbits/sec                  
[  5]   6.00-7.00   sec  35.1 MBytes   295 Mbits/sec                  
[  5]   7.00-8.00   sec  34.3 MBytes   288 Mbits/sec                  
[  5]   8.00-9.00   sec  34.1 MBytes   286 Mbits/sec                  
[  5]   9.00-10.00  sec  35.5 MBytes   298 Mbits/sec                  
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
[ ID] Interval           Transfer     Bitrate         Retr
[  5]   0.00-10.01  sec   346 MBytes   290 Mbits/sec  15149             sender
[  5]   0.00-10.00  sec   343 MBytes   288 Mbits/sec                  receiver


After midnight, customer edge is no longer congested and I can get almost full speed, making IPv4 2.6x faster than IPv6.

Result interpretation
My Oracle Cloud instance get full speed regardless of time, to both TM and Singapore speedtest server. However I don't know how to make speedtest-cli run test on IPv6, so they are all IPv4 result.

At 10:30pm, IPv4 performance is 14% of subscribed speed and IPv6 performance is 35% of subscribed speed.
At 12:30am, IPv4 performance is 96% of subscribed speed and IPv6 performance is 36% of subscribed speed.
Since the speedtest between Oracle and TM ran full speed during both time, the only explanation for the slowness is congestion on the customer edge (BNG or OLT). As for why I can get perfect speedtest score at home, the only explanation I can think of is TM QoS to prioritize it.

Unknown
The question then become: Is TM-Equinix permanently congested?
It seems odd that TM do not utilize TM-Equinix link for the egress as both IPv4 and IPv6 transit via SingTel.
On the ingress, the only explanation why IPv4 transit via Hurricane while IPv6 peer directly in Equinix is that TM actually perform some kind of traffic engineering.

IPv4 is better than IPv6 debate
As can be seen here, depending on time, IPv4 can be better than IPv6 and vice versa, on the exact same route, with the exact same endpoint.
tng55
post Jul 5 2024, 02:38 AM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,443 posts

Joined: Sep 2021


QUOTE(tng55 @ Jun 29 2024, 09:43 PM)
hey
i already go office ip range is 115.133.xxx.xxx.xxx
ping seeen good

[attachmentid=11498218]

daaam i stuck ip 42.189 sigh how i get ip change sad

my office last ip was 175.xxx
suddenly my office power outage lol now become 115.133.xxx seen good resuit
*
guys before i still stuck ip range 42.189
i had report tm group post some tm team i know i had pm messager facebook for tm group people
not unifi facebook i had request then i got tm team call me 0194xxxx its tm technical i did tell explain and i want show video ping too high then he said got whatsapp so i had send then still no help to change IP range 175.xxx or 115.xxx or 218.xxx
then few days i don't know no there any message any update
then now 2am i was watching youtube suddenly buffering i had refresh f5 still not loading
then i check router logs 2.17am disconnect waiting reconnect auto But BTU PON Not blinking its stay stable light
BTU PON stable after 5min waiting now 2.19am connected
i see i got new ip range 175.xxx.xxx yay yay yay i am very happy
i did try ping shopee i got 13MS nice

let me tomorow tonight 10pm i will checking any slow or not

This post has been edited by tng55: Jul 5 2024, 02:41 AM
cklove96
post Jul 5 2024, 04:24 AM

hehe
*****
Junior Member
706 posts

Joined: Feb 2017

QUOTE(tng55 @ Jul 5 2024, 03:38 AM)
guys before i still stuck ip range 42.189
i had report tm group post some tm team i know i had pm messager facebook for tm group people
not unifi facebook i had request then i got tm team call me 0194xxxx its tm technical i did tell explain and i want show video ping too high then he said got whatsapp so i had send then still no help to change IP range 175.xxx or 115.xxx or 218.xxx
then few days i don't know no there any message any update
then now 2am i was watching youtube suddenly buffering i had refresh f5 still not loading
then i check router logs 2.17am disconnect waiting reconnect auto But BTU PON Not blinking its stay stable light
BTU PON stable after 5min waiting now 2.19am connected
i see i got new ip range 175.xxx.xxx yay yay yay i am very happy
i did try ping shopee i got 13MS nice

let me tomorow tonight 10pm i will checking any slow or not
*
user posted image
xjoshualaw29
post Jul 5 2024, 10:06 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
304 posts

Joined: Aug 2018


QUOTE(cklove96 @ Jul 5 2024, 04:24 AM)
user posted image
*
I had to agree there... the sentence making is very broken but okay la we malaysian. I can understand it. lol.gif
Quanta
post Jul 5 2024, 10:18 AM

Idiot member
******
Senior Member
1,425 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Pearl 14000 + Kayangan 01000


chatgpt also can't decipher those sentences
heLL_bOy
post Jul 5 2024, 10:42 AM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,350 posts

Joined: Nov 2004
From: HEAVEN & HELL


QUOTE(tng55 @ Jul 5 2024, 02:38 AM)
guys before i still stuck ip range 42.189
i had report tm group post some tm team i know i had pm messager facebook for tm group people
not unifi facebook i had request then i got tm team call me 0194xxxx its tm technical i did tell explain and i want show video ping too high then he said got whatsapp so i had send then still no help to change IP range 175.xxx or 115.xxx or 218.xxx
then few days i don't know no there any message any update
then now 2am i was watching youtube suddenly buffering i had refresh f5 still not loading
then i check router logs 2.17am disconnect waiting reconnect auto But BTU PON Not blinking its stay stable light
BTU PON stable after 5min waiting now 2.19am connected
i see i got new ip range 175.xxx.xxx yay yay yay i am very happy
i did try ping shopee i got 13MS nice

let me tomorow tonight 10pm i will checking any slow or not
*
IP range cant be changed by normal TM technician.
heLL_bOy
post Jul 5 2024, 10:50 AM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,350 posts

Joined: Nov 2004
From: HEAVEN & HELL


QUOTE(kwss @ Jul 5 2024, 01:35 AM)
TM is having  congestion issue at the customer edge and is cheating their speedtest. There is also congestion with TM-Equinix.
Here is a test I did at 10:30pm and 12:30am. Test done between my home and Oracle Cloud Singapore, using non-burstable instance (aka they are expensive but give me full CPU and 2 Gbps network performance).

Baseline at 10:30pm
1.9 Gbps locally in Singapore
https://www.speedtest.net/result/c/d30796bb...6a-6c218b1c6532

2 Gbps to Telekom Malaysia
https://www.speedtest.net/result/c/470331b9...6c-748b4a243310

Baseline at 12:30am
1.9 Gbps locally in Singapore
https://www.speedtest.net/result/c/9105b19a...40-c09e0e475ceb

1.9 Gbps to Telekom Malaysia
https://www.speedtest.net/result/c/8030bef7...9d-1473cff9b7d9

My own speedtest will max out at 800 Mbps / 200 Mbps every single time (using both speedtest.net and ipv6.speedtest.net). I am sure a lot of people have the same experience.

IPv4 Traceroute is the same during both time.
Oracle Cloud to my home
CODE

traceroute to <domain censored> (115.134.181.60), 30 hops max, 60 byte packets
1  140.91.232.46 (140.91.232.46)  0.162 ms 140.91.232.50 (140.91.232.50)  0.136 ms 140.91.232.7 (140.91.232.7)  0.198 ms
2  31898.sgw.equinix.com (27.111.229.44)  1.088 ms  0.792 ms  1.068 ms
3  6939.sgw.equinix.com (27.111.228.81)  25.688 ms * *
4  telekom-malaysia-inc.e0-71.core2.sin1.he.net (74.82.46.50)  2.270 ms  2.247 ms  2.265 ms
5  * * *
6  115.134.181.60 (115.134.181.60)  11.123 ms  14.259 ms  14.256 ms


My home to Oracle Cloud
CODE

traceroute to <domain censored> (168.138.188.163), 30 hops max, 60 byte packets
1  _gateway (192.168.88.1)  0.255 ms  0.232 ms  0.506 ms
2  115.134.191.254 (115.134.191.254)  7.592 ms  7.578 ms  7.564 ms
3  10.55.49.99 (10.55.49.99)  12.407 ms  12.424 ms  12.378 ms
4  10.55.107.93 (10.55.107.93)  9.530 ms 10.55.39.197 (10.55.39.197)  8.166 ms 10.55.107.95 (10.55.107.95)  9.501 ms
5  10.55.100.54 (10.55.100.54)  11.966 ms  11.968 ms  11.908 ms
6  * * *
7  140.91.232.23 (140.91.232.23)  14.586 ms 140.91.232.19 (140.91.232.19)  13.581 ms 140.91.232.31 (140.91.232.31)  14.527 ms
8  * 168.138.188.163 (168.138.188.163)  17.556 ms  17.533 ms


IPv6 Traceroute is also the same during both time.
Oracle Cloud to my home
CODE

traceroute to <domain censored> (2001:e68:5427:3c12:164:5ba5:d348:18dd), 30 hops max, 80 byte packets
1  2603:c000:1100::8c5b:e82e (2603:c000:1100::8c5b:e82e)  0.172 ms 2603:c000:1100::8c5b:e80c (2603:c000:1100::8c5b:e80c)  0.142 ms 2603:c000:1100::8c5b:e82c (2603:c000:1100::8c5b:e82c)  0.122 ms
2  31898.sgw.equinix.com (2001:de8:4::3:1898:1)  0.880 ms  3.299 ms  3.257 ms
3  2001:de8:4::4788:3 (2001:de8:4::4788:3)  2.787 ms  2.799 ms  2.749 ms
4  2001:e68:5427:3c12::1 (2001:e68:5427:3c12::1)  11.058 ms  11.036 ms  10.976 ms
5  2001:e68:5427:3c12:164:5ba5:d348:18dd (2001:e68:5427:3c12:164:5ba5:d348:18dd)  10.866 ms  19.580 ms  19.567 ms


My home to Oracle Cloud
CODE

traceroute to <domain censored> (2603:c024:4512:ef00:3a30:bdcb:ccd9:3e7a), 30 hops max, 80 byte packets
1  2001:e68:5427:3c12::1 (2001:e68:5427:3c12::1)  0.220 ms  0.334 ms  0.381 ms
2  2001:e68:402c:8001::6c (2001:e68:402c:8001::6c)  7.030 ms  7.013 ms  7.673 ms
3  2001:e68::b:4011 (2001:e68::b:4011)  12.609 ms  12.592 ms  12.577 ms
4  2001:c10:80:2::615 (2001:c10:80:2::615)  15.260 ms  15.244 ms  14.782 ms
5  2001:c10:80:2::6be (2001:c10:80:2::6be)  25.246 ms  14.446 ms  14.448 ms
6  2001:c10:80:2::2bd (2001:c10:80:2::2bd)  14.689 ms 2001:c10:80:2::60d (2001:c10:80:2::60d)  10.629 ms 2001:c10:80:2::2bd (2001:c10:80:2::2bd)  12.199 ms
7  2603:c000:1100::8c5b:e812 (2603:c000:1100::8c5b:e812)  14.492 ms 2603:c000:1100::8c5b:e816 (2603:c000:1100::8c5b:e816)  10.595 ms 2603:c000:1100::8c5b:e815 (2603:c000:1100::8c5b:e815)  14.187 ms
8  * 2603:c024:4512:ef00:3a30:bdcb:ccd9:3e7a (2603:c024:4512:ef00:3a30:bdcb:ccd9:3e7a)  14.043 ms  14.020 ms


As can be seen above for IPv6 connection, Oracle exchange traffic directly with TM inside Equinix.
For IPv4, traffic is offloaded to Hurricane Electric inside Equinix, then transit to TM.
Hint: You can know this from XXXXX.sgw.equinix.com. XXXXX is the AS number of the egress peer. This naming convention is specific to Equinix and does not necessary apply to other IXP.

Actual performance at 10:30pm
IPv4
CODE

Reverse mode, remote host <domain censored> is sending
[  5] local 192.168.88.13 port 36194 connected to 168.138.188.163 port 65535
[ ID] Interval           Transfer     Bitrate
[  5]   0.00-1.00   sec  4.35 MBytes  36.5 Mbits/sec                  
[  5]   1.00-2.00   sec  13.4 MBytes   112 Mbits/sec                  
[  5]   2.00-3.00   sec  17.5 MBytes   147 Mbits/sec                  
[  5]   3.00-4.00   sec  12.6 MBytes   106 Mbits/sec                  
[  5]   4.00-5.00   sec  12.9 MBytes   108 Mbits/sec                  
[  5]   5.00-6.00   sec  13.9 MBytes   116 Mbits/sec                  
[  5]   6.00-7.00   sec  17.8 MBytes   149 Mbits/sec                  
[  5]   7.00-8.00   sec  13.5 MBytes   114 Mbits/sec                  
[  5]   8.00-9.00   sec  12.4 MBytes   104 Mbits/sec                  
[  5]   9.00-10.00  sec  17.8 MBytes   150 Mbits/sec                  
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
[ ID] Interval           Transfer     Bitrate         Retr
[  5]   0.00-10.08  sec   139 MBytes   116 Mbits/sec  10334             sender
[  5]   0.00-10.00  sec   136 MBytes   114 Mbits/sec                  receiver


IPv6
CODE

Reverse mode, remote host <domain censored> is sending
[  5] local 2001:e68:5427:3c12:164:5ba5:d348:18dd port 35422 connected to 2603:c024:4512:ef00:3a30:bdcb:ccd9:3e7a port 65535
[ ID] Interval           Transfer     Bitrate
[  5]   0.00-1.00   sec  29.1 MBytes   244 Mbits/sec                  
[  5]   1.00-2.00   sec  35.4 MBytes   297 Mbits/sec                  
[  5]   2.00-3.00   sec  33.2 MBytes   279 Mbits/sec                  
[  5]   3.00-4.00   sec  34.9 MBytes   293 Mbits/sec                  
[  5]   4.00-5.00   sec  33.5 MBytes   281 Mbits/sec                  
[  5]   5.00-6.00   sec  34.3 MBytes   288 Mbits/sec                  
[  5]   6.00-7.00   sec  34.1 MBytes   286 Mbits/sec                  
[  5]   7.00-8.00   sec  34.8 MBytes   292 Mbits/sec                  
[  5]   8.00-9.00   sec  33.5 MBytes   281 Mbits/sec                  
[  5]   9.00-10.00  sec  34.4 MBytes   289 Mbits/sec                  
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
[ ID] Interval           Transfer     Bitrate         Retr
[  5]   0.00-10.02  sec   340 MBytes   285 Mbits/sec  13239             sender
[  5]   0.00-10.00  sec   337 MBytes   283 Mbits/sec                  receiver


From here you can see IPv6 is actually 2.5x faster when Oracle-TM directly exchange traffic inside Equinix.

Actual performance at 12:30am
IPv4
CODE

Reverse mode, remote host <domain censored> is sending
[  5] local 192.168.88.13 port 36554 connected to 168.138.188.163 port 65535
[ ID] Interval           Transfer     Bitrate
[  5]   0.00-1.00   sec  83.4 MBytes   699 Mbits/sec                  
[  5]   1.00-2.00   sec  95.3 MBytes   799 Mbits/sec                  
[  5]   2.00-3.00   sec  92.7 MBytes   778 Mbits/sec                  
[  5]   3.00-4.00   sec  93.3 MBytes   783 Mbits/sec                  
[  5]   4.00-5.00   sec  91.6 MBytes   768 Mbits/sec                  
[  5]   5.00-6.00   sec  89.7 MBytes   752 Mbits/sec                  
[  5]   6.00-7.00   sec  93.2 MBytes   782 Mbits/sec                  
[  5]   7.00-8.00   sec  92.4 MBytes   775 Mbits/sec                  
[  5]   8.00-9.00   sec  90.1 MBytes   756 Mbits/sec                  
[  5]   9.00-10.00  sec  93.3 MBytes   783 Mbits/sec                  
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
[ ID] Interval           Transfer     Bitrate         Retr
[  5]   0.00-10.02  sec   918 MBytes   769 Mbits/sec  46250             sender
[  5]   0.00-10.00  sec   915 MBytes   767 Mbits/sec                  receiver


IPv6
CODE

Reverse mode, remote host <domain censored> is sending
[  5] local 2001:e68:5427:3c12:164:5ba5:d348:18dd port 48856 connected to 2603:c024:4512:ef00:3a30:bdcb:ccd9:3e7a port 65535
[ ID] Interval           Transfer     Bitrate
[  5]   0.00-1.00   sec  31.3 MBytes   263 Mbits/sec                  
[  5]   1.00-2.00   sec  34.9 MBytes   292 Mbits/sec                  
[  5]   2.00-3.00   sec  34.8 MBytes   292 Mbits/sec                  
[  5]   3.00-4.00   sec  35.4 MBytes   297 Mbits/sec                  
[  5]   4.00-5.00   sec  33.9 MBytes   284 Mbits/sec                  
[  5]   5.00-6.00   sec  33.7 MBytes   283 Mbits/sec                  
[  5]   6.00-7.00   sec  35.1 MBytes   295 Mbits/sec                  
[  5]   7.00-8.00   sec  34.3 MBytes   288 Mbits/sec                  
[  5]   8.00-9.00   sec  34.1 MBytes   286 Mbits/sec                  
[  5]   9.00-10.00  sec  35.5 MBytes   298 Mbits/sec                  
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
[ ID] Interval           Transfer     Bitrate         Retr
[  5]   0.00-10.01  sec   346 MBytes   290 Mbits/sec  15149             sender
[  5]   0.00-10.00  sec   343 MBytes   288 Mbits/sec                  receiver


After midnight, customer edge is no longer congested and I can get almost full speed, making IPv4 2.6x faster than IPv6.

Result interpretation
My Oracle Cloud instance get full speed regardless of time, to both TM and Singapore speedtest server. However I don't know how to make speedtest-cli run test on IPv6, so they are all IPv4 result.

At 10:30pm, IPv4 performance is 14% of subscribed speed and IPv6 performance is 35% of subscribed speed.
At 12:30am, IPv4 performance is 96% of subscribed speed and IPv6 performance is 36% of subscribed speed.
Since the speedtest between Oracle and TM ran full speed during both time, the only explanation for the slowness is congestion on the customer edge (BNG or OLT). As for why I can get perfect speedtest score at home, the only explanation I can think of is TM QoS to prioritize it.

Unknown
The question then become: Is TM-Equinix permanently congested?
It seems odd that TM do not utilize TM-Equinix link for the egress as both IPv4 and IPv6 transit via SingTel.
On the ingress, the only explanation why IPv4 transit via Hurricane while IPv6 peer directly in Equinix is that TM actually perform some kind of traffic engineering.

IPv4 is better than IPv6 debate
As can be seen here, depending on time, IPv4 can be better than IPv6 and vice versa, on the exact same route, with the exact same endpoint.
*
AFAIK, He.net have 1000Gbps on Equinix SG.

Is TM limitation on their downspeed (Ingress) nothing to do with Equinix congestion or He.net itself.

Previously TM using SGIX as (Ingress) not much issue, currently some has been diverted back to He.net

tng55
post Jul 5 2024, 11:22 AM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,443 posts

Joined: Sep 2021


QUOTE(heLL_bOy @ Jul 5 2024, 10:42 AM)
IP range cant be changed by normal TM technician.
*
yah i know that already got 175.xxx.xxx i think 2 level TM technician
kwss
post Jul 5 2024, 11:28 AM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,208 posts

Joined: Aug 2018
QUOTE(heLL_bOy @ Jul 5 2024, 10:50 AM)
AFAIK, He.net have 1000Gbps on Equinix SG.

Is TM limitation on their downspeed (Ingress) nothing to do with Equinix congestion or He.net itself.

Previously TM using SGIX as (Ingress) not much issue, currently some has been diverted back to He.net
*
My first 2 paragraphs already said it's TM problem. Don't think I blame HE or Equinix anywhere.
TM-Equinix and Hurricane-TM refers to the peering between 2 parties. Not saying Hurricane or Equinix is at fault.

The rest of the post is facts to support my claim.

This post has been edited by kwss: Jul 5 2024, 11:30 AM

Topic ClosedOptions
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0279sec    0.52    6 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 14th December 2025 - 03:56 PM