Which package? 800Mbps here ok. Still public. I think a few 300Mbps got private. Those who got free upgrade from 100-300?

Could be a mistake by TM since you're on 300Mbps. I just checked my neighbour's and they're still on public IP. They are 100Mbps, possibly upgraded to 300Mbps by now. Can't check their speed because they're still using Asus RT-N12.

PRIVATE IP
30 Mbps
50 Mbps
100 Mbps
300 Mbps

PUBLIC IP
500 Mbps
800 Mbps
1 Gbps
2 Gbps

TM lost its peering with Cloudflare.
If I remember correctly, TM used to peer with Cloudflare. Now all traffic to Cloudflare goes to Telstra.
Checking AS4788 in bgpview.io confirms they no longer peer with Cloudflare.
Maxis (AS9534) and Celcom (AS10030) do have peering with Cloudflare.

Looking into Cloudflare's peering policy (https://www.cloudflare.com/peering-policy/), the only clause that can cause this is:
"To suspend, without notice, peering connectivity in the event of a severe quality of service issue such as high latency, packet loss, or jitter pattern is detected and to take appropriate traffic engineering steps to maintain service quality."

I am also having a bad time with AWS right now routing me to Cogent Singapore > AWS India. None of the telco seems to peer with AWS, even though all of them interconnect with MyIX.
Amazon's peering policy (https://aws.amazon.com/peering/policy/) is a lot stricter compared to Cloudflare, like you must connect to at least 2 edge location and your pipe must be at least double the size of your peak traffic.

Both Cloudflare and Amazon did not do RS Peer inside MyIX, which can be verified here:
https://www.peeringdb.com/net/1418
https://www.peeringdb.com/net/4224

What this means is that peering must be setup manually. So either TM is lazy or they already maxed out their pipe.
The question then becomes: How hard is it to add a bigger pipe to MyIX? It is right inside KL and the port fees is in Ringgit, not some foreign currency.
https://myix.my/services/?sid=port-fees

BTW, you can do a speedtest to MyIX by changing the server to "MyIX". It's 2am and I only get 200Mbps, what a joke.

I don't know when it happen but I found a website that allows you to visualize this:
https://cloudflare-test.judge.sh

Open this with Celcom, Maxis and TM. The difference is immediate. There is no reason to peer in SG when all the big tech have presence in MyIX.

Case study: lowyat.net
With Celcom and Maxis, they go straight to MyIX. I believe they host their stuff at IP Server One, who also has peering in MyIX. So from Cloudflare > IP Server One is all within MyIX.

With TM, it is going to Cloudflare SG. Then Cloudflare SG has to come back to IP Server One in Malaysia to fetch all the forum post.

Having CDN as the front door doesn't means all your data is stored in CDN. I don't believe Cloudflare has the whole lowyat database.

I am not too sure if they had peering with Amazon but at least now it go thru Equinix SG instead of Cogent. I no longer end up in India like last night.

Hi guys, is there any side effects if I disable IPv6? Is it okay if I just use IPv4 for now? Will be setting in router configuration.

guys before i still stuck ip range 42.189
i had report tm group post some tm team i know i had pm messager facebook for tm group people
not unifi facebook i had request then i got tm team call me 0194xxxx its tm technical i did tell explain and i want show video ping too high then he said got whatsapp so i had send then still no help to change IP range 175.xxx or 115.xxx or 218.xxx
then few days i don't know no there any message any update
then now 2am i was watching youtube suddenly buffering i had refresh f5 still not loading
then i check router logs 2.17am disconnect waiting reconnect auto But BTU PON Not blinking its stay stable light
BTU PON stable after 5min waiting now 2.19am connected
i see i got new ip range 175.xxx.xxx yay yay yay i am very happy
i did try ping shopee i got 13MS nice

let me tomorow tonight 10pm i will checking any slow or not

TM is having  congestion issue at the customer edge and is cheating their speedtest. There is also congestion with TM-Equinix.
Here is a test I did at 10:30pm and 12:30am. Test done between my home and Oracle Cloud Singapore, using non-burstable instance (aka they are expensive but give me full CPU and 2 Gbps network performance).

Baseline at 10:30pm
1.9 Gbps locally in Singapore
https://www.speedtest.net/result/c/d30796bb...6a-6c218b1c6532

2 Gbps to Telekom Malaysia
https://www.speedtest.net/result/c/470331b9...6c-748b4a243310

Baseline at 12:30am
1.9 Gbps locally in Singapore
https://www.speedtest.net/result/c/9105b19a...40-c09e0e475ceb

1.9 Gbps to Telekom Malaysia
https://www.speedtest.net/result/c/8030bef7...9d-1473cff9b7d9

My own speedtest will max out at 800 Mbps / 200 Mbps every single time (using both speedtest.net and ipv6.speedtest.net). I am sure a lot of people have the same experience.

IPv4 Traceroute is the same during both time.
Oracle Cloud to my home


My home to Oracle Cloud


IPv6 Traceroute is also the same during both time.
Oracle Cloud to my home


My home to Oracle Cloud


As can be seen above for IPv6 connection, Oracle exchange traffic directly with TM inside Equinix.
For IPv4, traffic is offloaded to Hurricane Electric inside Equinix, then transit to TM.
Hint: You can know this from XXXXX.sgw.equinix.com. XXXXX is the AS number of the egress peer. This naming convention is specific to Equinix and does not necessary apply to other IXP.

Actual performance at 10:30pm
IPv4


IPv6


From here you can see IPv6 is actually 2.5x faster when Oracle-TM directly exchange traffic inside Equinix.

Actual performance at 12:30am
IPv4


IPv6


After midnight, customer edge is no longer congested and I can get almost full speed, making IPv4 2.6x faster than IPv6.

Result interpretation
My Oracle Cloud instance get full speed regardless of time, to both TM and Singapore speedtest server. However I don't know how to make speedtest-cli run test on IPv6, so they are all IPv4 result.

At 10:30pm, IPv4 performance is 14% of subscribed speed and IPv6 performance is 35% of subscribed speed.
At 12:30am, IPv4 performance is 96% of subscribed speed and IPv6 performance is 36% of subscribed speed.
Since the speedtest between Oracle and TM ran full speed during both time, the only explanation for the slowness is congestion on the customer edge (BNG or OLT). As for why I can get perfect speedtest score at home, the only explanation I can think of is TM QoS to prioritize it.

Unknown
The question then become: Is TM-Equinix permanently congested?
It seems odd that TM do not utilize TM-Equinix link for the egress as both IPv4 and IPv6 transit via SingTel.
On the ingress, the only explanation why IPv4 transit via Hurricane while IPv6 peer directly in Equinix is that TM actually perform some kind of traffic engineering.

IPv4 is better than IPv6 debate
As can be seen here, depending on time, IPv4 can be better than IPv6 and vice versa, on the exact same route, with the exact same endpoint.

I notice it's been a while now that everyday after around 9pm, something funny is going on with Unifi.

I am having hard time accessing my office server (Office on Maxis fiber) at full speed after around 9pm from home (Unifi plan), even I turn on Tailscale also maximum can only achieve below 100kbps. But, I can achieve full speed when I use my mobile data.

Anyone got any insider news on what actually is going on with Unifi? Is it just temporary or it's going to be there permanently? I'm contemplating to switch out from Unifi, paying full price but not getting the full service.

Meaning to say TM identify high usage accounts and limit their bandwidth, such as my case my bandwidth was limited to under 100kbps consistently after 9pm?

I don't really understand what do you mean by peering with TM, do you mean it make no different even if I switch from Unifi to Maxis?

https://bgp.he.net/AS4788#_peers

https://bgp.he.net/AS9534
https://bgp.he.net/AS9930

If BGP HE is accurate, both Maxis and TIME peers with TM.

Its depend on which ISP.
AFAIK Maxis and Time have private peering with TM.
Other ISP have public peering with TM (via MyIX)

I'm accessing my own server at the office (10km away from home). Both side got Tailscale installed.
I getting the same speed after 9pm no matter I access the public IP or with Tailscale VPN.

I will try to switch to Maxis.

That's the problem of gamer vs ISP in general.

ISP only care about IP address and AS.
Gamer talk about geographic location.

Until you can provide a traceroute to the game server, reporting is just a waste of everyone time. They 100% close your report.

But since you mention Singapore, I guess it's TM-Equinix again. Well known peering that's congested all the time.

From observation, I suspect that as well but I cannot proof it.
I think they are trying to save bandwidth cost by gaming the 95 percentile calculation.

So there's nothing much a customer can do except to just keep submitting a report until someone in TM notices the same complaints over and over again?

I don't think they egress via TM for these route. Need to perform traceroute to be certain.
Or they bill them a slightly higher 95th percentile so TM profit from it. After all TM do provide IP Transit.

Can you access https://8.8.8.8 ? If can, then your area not affected yet.

Is there a way to make WARP connect to SG servers ? Getting 100ms in-game to SG servers.

Do I need to use Wireguard ?