The thing about tp link modem models, it's very difficult to identify which chipset they are using. Even for the x50-5g model, if not mistaken there's no official statement from tp link which chipset they use. Same goes for archer nx200.

My area got 5g. My phone detect 5g and the speed is good. However when I'm using the free ZTE modem, it catches the 5g signal but very weak.

So hopefully the archer nx200 that i bought can catch the 5g signal better. My aim is at least 150mbps is ok already. Not hoping for more than 300mbps. Because my current ZTE modem speed is only less than 20mbps.

i think all you can do now is wait and test
not much review of it on youtube as well...meanwhile the X50 5G is using snapdragon X62 chip which guarantee to be great

Maybe it is because 5G mobile phone antennas and modem antennas use different frequency bands. IINM, 5G phone use higher frequency

Yes, modem placement very important. This is the best placefor me. Just inch move either left or right has huge impact on the reception signal.

With this modem i get at least 400++mbps.

This is the best signal i got. Slight move to either direction, these numbers can change drastically to worse.

This post has been edited by ameyhazuan: Dec 14 2024, 02:25 AM

For this speed, i can't complain.

TP-Link Archer NX200 simple review.

1. Modem material and build is top quality and premium.

2. Speed is very good (non-peak i got 400+ Mbps, not even full bar of 5g).

3. Wifi signal is very strong. I still get less than 30ms ping even when im outside my house, outside the gate (terrace house). However, the dl speed is less, which is normal when the wifi is far.

4. Ping i always get less than 30ms. Sometimes less than 20ms.

5. Setup is very simple. Got app where you can tune some settings. The app is user friendly.

6. Got a built-in fan to regulate heat.

I am a happy user! Highly recommend this modem to others.

Brb gonna sell the free ZTE modem now.

Yes, I also keep it vertical to get better signal, about -10 degree to the north. LOL.

The best signal I can achieve is around 91 dBm.

Good weather also helps.

Lol nonid sell lah, just keep it as backup, plus the UM router cannot use any other SIM except for Uhome5G iianm, last time i tried putting in my maxis and UM prepaid it won't connect.. Cipet

Ya correct. They lock sim only to umobile. I think i just keep it as backup

Hi,

Using this at Puchong area. The speed is less than 10mbps.

Lodged complaint with Umobile, they are asking me to do many test. Example, putting in sim card to phone, and test in multiple location.

The speedtest shows the same result with their router and Deco X50-5g. Is there anyone here encountered this before?

Puchong I tested with many sim/Telco before
Almost all of them have bars but cannot load anything

Is it really that congested in puchong has always been my question

Taman Tempua residents worried about construction of a telecommunications tower at a public park nearby
https://puchong.co/t/taman-tempua-residents...ark-nearby/2409

Saujana Puchong residents against telco tower, raise safety concerns
https://www.thestar.com.my/metro/metro-news...safety-concerns

Lol topkek, want to construct tower people complaint, when hp no line also complaint.. #apalagipeoplemau?

Thanks for both reply.

Seems like Umobile have no urge to solve this issue.
Just trying circle around until user fed-up.

Only UMobile.
Maxis/Hotlink full speed.

i've also tested with unifi mobile and digi

to say maxis is having full speed...someone just complained few days ago maxis no line in puchong

Haha. I get 400 mbps in Puchong with Umobile but of course, only at certain locations.

I suspect 5G lines get saturated very quickly. We just pray that other people don't come to use 5G near me.

Go somewhere else to use please. LOL.

This post has been edited by tmc: Dec 19 2024, 09:55 AM

i think it really depends on where you are or live
i tested mine along LDP, got bars but nothing moves

i think it gets worse at those area where residents refuse to setup telco towers

Probably the bars are due to incomplete facilities, which the phone devices mistaken them as having complete 5G facilities.