thanks to VikingW2K..
This post has been edited by ad_rv4: Aug 3 2007, 10:33 PM
| Bump Topic Topic Closed RSS Feed New Topic New Poll |
(disputed solved) ASUS PDA
|
|
Jul 27 2007, 10:31 PM, updated 19y ago
Show posts by this member only | Post
#1
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
478 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Kuantan, PAHANG |
we have good discussion thru PM and come out with the best solution, my apologies to all forumers, thanks to ADMIN..so sorry for the false accusations..
thanks to VikingW2K.. This post has been edited by ad_rv4: Aug 3 2007, 10:33 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
Jul 27 2007, 10:36 PM
Show posts by this member only | Post
#2
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,910 posts Joined: Jun 2005 From: Andy @ London.com Status: N/A |
So do ya wanna let go at cheaper than the price you bought ?
|
|
|
Jul 27 2007, 10:36 PM
Show posts by this member only | Post
#3
|
|
VIP
9,778 posts Joined: Jun 2005 From: KL(Wangsa Maju) , Seremban 2 |
Full Conversation Log here
» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... « My Sales Thread here All my picture posting method were the same. I'll include Front, Left, Right, Back. Full Set, and sometimes in Hand. Also, i do offer options for buyer to meet up, test nicely and deal if they are satisfied. I hardly find any reason to hide the actual condition of my items. This post has been edited by vikingw2k: Jul 27 2007, 10:59 PM |
|
|
Jul 27 2007, 10:39 PM
Show posts by this member only | Post
#4
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
478 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Kuantan, PAHANG |
hehe, i need to open new thread sales with the right infos to my potiental buyer right???
|
|
|
Jul 27 2007, 10:42 PM
Show posts by this member only | Post
#5
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,910 posts Joined: Jun 2005 From: Andy @ London.com Status: N/A |
|
|
|
Jul 27 2007, 10:43 PM
Show posts by this member only | Post
#6
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,112 posts Joined: Oct 2006 From: Kuala Lumpur |
@ ad_rv4
Why you keep clapping in your PMs ? Looking forward to seeing your pictures, claim down bro. Edited: @Viking, you shouldn't reveal buyer details and item price. This post has been edited by Sandwich2U: Jul 27 2007, 10:47 PM |
|
|
Jul 27 2007, 10:47 PM
Show posts by this member only | Post
#7
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
478 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Kuantan, PAHANG |
its me when im in this matter, u cannot accept ka oneself behaviour different from others when they in certain situation????
|
|
|
Jul 27 2007, 10:48 PM
Show posts by this member only | Post
#8
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
640 posts Joined: May 2005 From: Sarawak |
well.. for my opinion, if buyer ask regarding where is the 5% scratchness..
seller should at least show the part... not focus from a place where we cant notice the scratchness ( from the photo viking posted in his thread) well i juz can say, without COD ... its risky , even if the item is from normal user, SAFE trader OR EVEN trade enforcer.... but because of those "trusted" TAG ~... ppl from sarawak like me will trust them , and if i'm the one buying his phone judging from the photo its really 95% new (without seeing the top "fall down" scractchness part) i can say i got cheated also... |
|
|
Jul 27 2007, 10:49 PM
Show posts by this member only | Post
#9
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,112 posts Joined: Oct 2006 From: Kuala Lumpur |
QUOTE(ad_rv4 @ Jul 27 2007, 10:47 PM) its me when im in this matter, u cannot accept ka oneself behaviour different from others when they in certain situation???? Well, as per his picturesclick me I din see any scratches, correct me if i am wrong :hmmm: Added on July 27, 2007, 10:50 pm QUOTE(ingjoo @ Jul 27 2007, 10:48 PM) well.. for my opinion, if buyer ask regarding where is the 5% scratchness.. Yes, we shared the same thoughts.seller should at least show the part... not focus from a place where we cant notice the scratchness ( from the photo viking posted in his thread) well i juz can say, without COD ... its risky , even if the item is from normal user, SAFE trader OR EVEN trade enforcer.... but because of those "trusted" TAG ~... ppl from sarawak like me will trust them , and if i'm the one buying his phone judging from the photo its really 95% new (without seeing the top "fall down" scractchness part) i can say i got cheated also... This post has been edited by Sandwich2U: Jul 27 2007, 10:50 PM |
|
|
Jul 27 2007, 10:52 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
478 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Kuantan, PAHANG |
u cannot see from the pics, but u can ask seller about it..got or not???hihi
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jul 27 2007, 10:56 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
640 posts Joined: May 2005 From: Sarawak |
well... i need to say, viking dint deny about the "top part" scratchness that the buyer mention... so means its there before viking sold it and he should take some photo and inform the buyer regarding that
well.... actually the buyer can take some photo of the phone and show us to judge how BAD is the scratchness..... i mean if too SERIOUS, its really need to be meantion by the SELLER (who is to be a SAFE ENFORCER) because he mention 95% new... buyer know 95% new , he is more INTERESTED with the 5% bad ... seller know 5% bad, he is more like HIDING it... |
|
|
Jul 27 2007, 11:00 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,494 posts Joined: Dec 2005 From: Wangsa Maju |
For a seller, it is a good way to promote their item and show the picture as mint as possible (marketing strategy, rite?) but if his customer wants him to show all the item's part condition, then the seller is liable to show it.
|
|
|
Jul 27 2007, 11:00 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
12,505 posts Joined: May 2007 From: Triumph in the Skies Status:In LoV3 Again |
I'd say that seller should have snap the scratch area to show that the condition of the phone. It is subjective like what vikingw2k said. He is owner of the phone and selling it for sure will say try to minimize or tell that the scratches actually is very little, but buyer will think is more then that.
My point of view is that seller should have snap the scratch area and let the buyer to judge it himself. I think vikingw2k didn't show that part. This post has been edited by KTCY: Jul 27 2007, 11:01 PM |
|
|
Jul 27 2007, 11:05 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
300 posts Joined: Feb 2005 From: Kuching, Sarawak |
yes... vikingw2k should have shown photos of every basic angle... but i didnt see any photos of the top of the pda... if u want to sell an item u shud convince ppl dat it is totally like how u described it by showing pictures of every part of the phone... and u jus opt to leave out the photo of the top part...
|
|
|
Jul 27 2007, 11:08 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
12,505 posts Joined: May 2007 From: Triumph in the Skies Status:In LoV3 Again |
Well, even can't provide every single angel, at least come out the photo where the phone has scratches. It's more then enough for user to judge it.
|
|
|
Jul 27 2007, 11:15 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
478 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Kuantan, PAHANG |
the seller know 'its' there but juz ignored it, hope seller can make 'clear' statement, got or not hard scratch at the top part??? everyone here need to know the true story not behind scenes..
This post has been edited by ad_rv4: Jul 28 2007, 04:18 AM |
|
|
Jul 27 2007, 11:17 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,112 posts Joined: Oct 2006 From: Kuala Lumpur |
QUOTE(ad_rv4 @ Jul 27 2007, 11:15 PM) the seller know 'its' there but juz ignored it, hope buyer can make 'clear' statement, got or not hard scratch at the top part??? everyone here need to know the true story not behind scenes.. A picture paints a thousand words, so please snap some photos and share with us tomorrow. |
|
|
Jul 27 2007, 11:20 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
478 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Kuantan, PAHANG |
|
|
|
Jul 27 2007, 11:27 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,158 posts Joined: Apr 2005 From: -Butterworth, Penang- |
from the pic..the phone is really very new...
@ad_rv4 i think you should post up the pic to show us the visible scratch... btw if not mistaken, misleading picture or information to pursude buyer to purchase any item which is different from the actual condition is consider fraud according to Akta Jual Beli 1970 |
|
|
Jul 27 2007, 11:37 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
478 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Kuantan, PAHANG |
|
|
|
Jul 27 2007, 11:37 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
640 posts Joined: May 2005 From: Sarawak |
actually..... if this is done by normal user ... i mean without showing the TOP PART which got scratchness (notsure serious or not) we can "forgive" them since if they show tat part, the phone wont be 95% NEW and price will be reduced.... as they don like it
but if the SELLER is SAFE TRADER...... and now even SAFE ENFORCER.. i dunno what to say anymore.... they should know the rule better and they should show it to the buyer because maybe the buyer wont buy it after he see it like i buy a car , photo from front , side back look totally new.... but the seller dint take a snapshot from the top ... probably the top part (above all those 4 mirrors) maybe be dent .. its 95% new without showing to the buyer also mah.... it feels like cheating.. it feels more bad especially come from a SAFE ENFORCER |
|
|
Jul 27 2007, 11:42 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,695 posts Joined: Jan 2005 |
Take a high resolution pic of the scratched part & show it here.
Pointing fingers here & there won't solve the dispute. |
|
|
Jul 27 2007, 11:52 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,385 posts Joined: Nov 2005 From: Kuala Lumpur (KL) |
@ingjoo,
it's actually TRADE ENFORCER. By the way, hope u guys can settle this matter peacefully. I've dealt with both TS and Viking before so I'm not about to choose any sides... Regards. |
|
|
Jul 28 2007, 07:02 AM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
159 posts Joined: Aug 2005 From: Kuantan |
QUOTE(ad_rv4 @ Jul 27 2007, 10:52 PM) noted. carefully with him for the next. tidak jujur dalam urusan jual beli...ad_rv4; saya cadangkan awak bincang balik dengan viking/wong and return back barang to him la...get your money back la... for viking; jujurlah dalam urusan jual beli..when refer ur pic, no scracthes...when i see the real item, 80% scrathless...tak jujur!jaga reputation la...u trade enforcer This post has been edited by razzac: Jul 28 2007, 10:53 AM |
|
|
Jul 28 2007, 10:59 AM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
176 posts Joined: Jun 2005 |
hurm...how about the imei number? how can it be different?
|
|
|
Jul 28 2007, 11:18 AM
|
|
Moderator
2,083 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Penang |
I cant see any scratches..... n the picture u showed belongs to vikingw2k. So i suggest u take a few pics of ur own so we can see what's going on.
|
|
|
Jul 28 2007, 11:56 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
327 posts Joined: Aug 2006 From: Coffee Paradise |
QUOTE(Sandwich2U @ Jul 27 2007, 10:49 PM) Well, as per his pictures click me I din see any scratches, correct me if i am wrong :hmmm: Added on July 27, 2007, 10:50 pm Yes, we shared the same thoughts. QUOTE(ad_rv4 @ Jul 27 2007, 10:52 PM) QUOTE(Sandwich2U @ Jul 27 2007, 11:17 PM) well . from the pic that ad_rv4 show , the button there really does a terible scrathes . Compared to large area that this PDA phone can see , it is nearly and more than 95% scratchless . I think ad_rv4 juz not satisfy wif the BUTTO scratch at 80% .So wat do u guy think ? As ad_rv4 refer using seller's pic and didnt look it well . So 1st tot he admit it is 95% scratches from overall looks . This post has been edited by duo8668: Jul 28 2007, 11:56 AM |
|
|
Jul 28 2007, 11:59 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
478 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Kuantan, PAHANG |
plz wait till i upload pics of the top part, hihi..
|
|
|
Jul 28 2007, 12:00 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
15,278 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
how can you quantify scratches?
i see like 80% scratches la, 100% scratches la.....is it the length or amount of scratches per square inch or what? |
|
|
Jul 28 2007, 12:08 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
327 posts Joined: Aug 2006 From: Coffee Paradise |
QUOTE(ad_rv4 @ Jul 28 2007, 11:59 AM) It need to be settle fast dude . If dun hav camera faster go borrow as this thread go longer and delayed may bring negative effect to seller too . QUOTE(kev da man @ Jul 28 2007, 12:00 PM) how can you quantify scratches? 1 small part like the button as TS metioned , i quote it as 98% scratchless . But if the back of the phone hav 3 lines above , even it is thinny lines , but once it cover from top till bottom area , i quote it as 50% scratchless .i see like 80% scratches la, 100% scratches la.....is it the length or amount of scratches per square inch or what? I quantify it by area that human eyes easy to detect and look at . |
|
|
Jul 28 2007, 12:40 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
764 posts Joined: Mar 2007 From: ur HDD (im the latest virus) |
actually,i dont like vikingw2k cos he threaten the buyer.look at his TERMS AND CONDITIONS
QUOTE 1. Im well aware of the market price, any comments or suggestions u may PM me politely instead of dropping ur 2cents on my thread & earn urself a warning. |
|
|
Jul 28 2007, 12:47 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
327 posts Joined: Aug 2006 From: Coffee Paradise |
That isnt big trouble . When u saw a ST that pm u and ask his admin fren to take action on u , how will u feel ?
I am still considering wanna open that thread to take action on useless mod and ST . Since fren cover fren , how survive ? |
|
|
Jul 28 2007, 01:19 PM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
159 posts Joined: Aug 2005 From: Kuantan |
|
|
|
Jul 28 2007, 01:37 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,378 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Miri,Sarawak,Malaysia Status: Dead! |
QUOTE(duo8668 @ Jul 28 2007, 12:47 PM) That isnt big trouble . When u saw a ST that pm u and ask his admin fren to take action on u , how will u feel ? LOL. I got ya.I am still considering wanna open that thread to take action on useless mod and ST . Since fren cover fren , how survive ? @TS Have your picture ready as soon as possible. When it comes to condition situation, have to solve it as soon as possible, else you also won't get much benifits as well. Eg. After two days, picture uploaded, but seller can denied that the scratches are there before sending out, which can be buyer who accidentally scratched it. You know, pushing resposibility around, this is not good either. ^ Only example, don't take it seriously. |
|
|
Jul 28 2007, 01:46 PM
|
|
Forum Admin
44,415 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
razzac, duo and ali - please do not spam. the rest of you, stop spamming until viking speaks again.
contributive info is fine, but just don't spam. |
|
|
Jul 28 2007, 01:51 PM
|
|
Staff
9,417 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Bladin Point, Northern Territory |
Hardly quantifiable and certainly within the realm of subjectivity and unless you have an objective formula to rate the amount of scratches, caveat emptor, because in my view, from the pic, it doesn't really seem scratched.
|
|
|
Jul 28 2007, 01:54 PM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
129 posts Joined: Jan 2005 |
just be careful when buying viking's item cause usually he'll sell item which he trade in with others.
for example, if he got a phone to sell and usually he'll say trade in with ANYTHING. so when u want to trade, say for example..another phone/gadgets..he'll buy with with a very low price and then list it again at lowyat after mark-up. |
|
|
Jul 28 2007, 02:38 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
955 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Ipoh/MMU Melaka/MMU Cyber<->Puchong |
actually form viking2k thread i also saw the chrome part memang already tear out marr....
TS, u really kenot see the tear before u bought the pda ?? |
|
|
Jul 28 2007, 02:47 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,236 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: BB Bangi |
QUOTE(silverblue @ Jul 28 2007, 01:54 PM) just be careful when buying viking's item cause usually he'll sell item which he trade in with others. what is wrong with that? he is a trader, and that is how the business goes.. for example, if he got a phone to sell and usually he'll say trade in with ANYTHING. so when u want to trade, say for example..another phone/gadgets..he'll buy with with a very low price and then list it again at lowyat after mark-up. anyway, i think buyer should bear a wee bit of responsibiliy for paying before 100% sure of the condition. if u paid, means u agreed with the buy and sell term, and the seller has the right to not refund as long as it works as promised, and the warranty is valid.. it is the buyer's responsibility to ensure that the item's external condition is up to his own standard before paying cause external condition is arguable and almost impossible to quantify.. he could argue that the scratches are only 5% while u could take it as 20%.. safest is still to COD, or dun buy if there's any doubt.. |
|
|
Jul 28 2007, 03:16 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,695 posts Joined: Jan 2005 |
QUOTE(silverblue @ Jul 28 2007, 01:54 PM) just be careful when buying viking's item cause usually he'll sell item which he trade in with others. Hey, that's how the business is run.for example, if he got a phone to sell and usually he'll say trade in with ANYTHING. so when u want to trade, say for example..another phone/gadgets..he'll buy with with a very low price and then list it again at lowyat after mark-up. Nobody is forcing anybody to trade-in at low price. In fact, this is how Cash Converters operate. And I can only say they are worse. U can do the same too. If u have excess cash to buy/sell/hold & bear the risk of low to no demand & daily depreciation. |
|
|
Jul 28 2007, 05:32 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,070 posts Joined: Dec 2006 From: Damansara |
judging from the pix,all in good condition but without a pix of the part only....hope this can be settle soon....
|
|
|
Jul 28 2007, 05:38 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
20,901 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Miri, Sarawak |
To TS.. so all you need now is a refund from viking.?
|
|
|
Jul 28 2007, 06:04 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,081 posts Joined: Aug 2005 |
no refund shud b made n nothing wrong wit d transaction.... d TS already saw d pic wit d scratches... so wats d problem?? jus that d TS dun notice throughly ab it... viking already told that, u can check till u ok... but u jus askin something soo subjective...
"something that is good to me, doesnt mean good to u..." |
|
|
Jul 28 2007, 06:43 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
12,505 posts Joined: May 2007 From: Triumph in the Skies Status:In LoV3 Again |
QUOTE(low yat 82 @ Jul 28 2007, 06:04 PM) no refund shud b made n nothing wrong wit d transaction.... d TS already saw d pic wit d scratches... so wats d problem?? jus that d TS dun notice throughly ab it... viking already told that, u can check till u ok... but u jus askin something soo subjective... Thought TS mean the up part which is not in the photo ?"something that is good to me, doesnt mean good to u..." The chrome part already visible and TS actually not complaining about that right ? |
|
|
Jul 28 2007, 06:50 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,081 posts Joined: Aug 2005 |
|
|
|
Jul 28 2007, 06:51 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
478 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Kuantan, PAHANG |
|
|
|
Jul 28 2007, 06:57 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
691 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Cheras |
I trade with Viking before, he after sales service he is bad till i fed up and buy the part that faulty 1 myself to replace.
|
|
|
Jul 28 2007, 07:01 PM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
159 posts Joined: Aug 2005 From: Kuantan |
|
|
|
Jul 28 2007, 07:04 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
12,505 posts Joined: May 2007 From: Triumph in the Skies Status:In LoV3 Again |
QUOTE(low yat 82 @ Jul 28 2007, 06:50 PM) Maybe you should read back 1st page mate. QUOTE(ad_rv4 @ Jul 28 2007, 06:51 PM) sorry dun hv frens with a high megapixel camera, so i take a lot of photo using my n73 and i got this.. Big scratches I must say. Should be a drop.i dont edit at all, tq ![]() I think vikingw2k should respond to it now. |
|
|
Jul 28 2007, 07:04 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
478 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Kuantan, PAHANG |
i juz wanna settle this peacefully, i want my money back, u seller can take back ur PDA..
|
|
|
Jul 28 2007, 07:11 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
691 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Cheras |
I dont think so he will do it... he a bad seller.
|
|
|
Jul 28 2007, 07:12 PM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
129 posts Joined: Jan 2005 |
QUOTE(ad_rv4 @ Jul 28 2007, 07:04 PM) he's not gonna do that cause he already made profit from the sell.my friend had a bad experience trading with him. after received the hp, the casing was scratches all over like so bad that it looked like it's been dropped several times. |
|
|
Jul 28 2007, 07:17 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
12,505 posts Joined: May 2007 From: Triumph in the Skies Status:In LoV3 Again |
From all the comments given, I'm wondering why he still hold the elite title with Trade Enforcer tag there.
For me, it's kinda mislead for newbie that might that the tag seriously and the newbie might think that he is a good seller. |
|
|
Jul 28 2007, 07:40 PM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
176 posts Joined: Jun 2005 |
is it scrath?? or a hole??
i think should refund.. |
|
|
Jul 28 2007, 07:42 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
12,505 posts Joined: May 2007 From: Triumph in the Skies Status:In LoV3 Again |
What I saw in the photo was a big hole. Something like after drop to some hard surface, the plastic drop off.
This post has been edited by KTCY: Jul 28 2007, 07:42 PM |
|
|
Jul 28 2007, 07:42 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,070 posts Joined: Dec 2006 From: Damansara |
|
|
|
Jul 28 2007, 07:53 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,112 posts Joined: Oct 2006 From: Kuala Lumpur |
QUOTE vikingw2k - av_rv4 1. Basically whenever a buyer asked me for the condition, i would just tell them to refer to the pictures coz if i were to describe, it would be too subjective. That's the reason i include the pictures to my sales thread so that you can know the condition of the item. If you wanted to see more you can meet up with me to see the actual condition too. If i were to hide the condition of the phone, i might as well don't post up the pictures at all and say the phone is in good working condition and let you do the guessing. Picture from Buyer ![]() Pictures from Seller » Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... « @Viking, Your pictures didn't show the scratch part on the top part of the phone It is somewhat unfair to your potential buyers. How did you expect people know there is a hard scratch there ? From your statement QUOTE If you wanted to see more you can meet up with me to see the actual condition too. If you weren't Elite Senior Member, i am pretty sure people won't do postage deal for your phone. He put his trust on you and you seriously disappointed him. This post has been edited by Sandwich2U: Jul 28 2007, 07:55 PM |
|
|
Jul 28 2007, 07:56 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,008 posts Joined: Mar 2006 From: Kuantan Pahang |
from the pic should be hardly drop on hard surface
and viking din show that part |
|
|
Jul 28 2007, 09:20 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,258 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Depan PC |
refund je la viking2k...dan lelong itu brg..aku beli rm200..hehehe
|
|
|
Jul 28 2007, 09:26 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,158 posts Joined: Apr 2005 From: -Butterworth, Penang- |
that look a hole to me ..and even abit crack at the black plastic cover.... horible to me >_<
is that call 95% scratchless...then my phone can consider 100% new with 1cm scratch line |
|
|
Jul 28 2007, 10:25 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
905 posts Joined: Aug 2006 |
The seller of the phone is pretty slick...see how the first pic in his sales thread was taken...a thumb was used to cover the part of the scratch...slick pic taking.... I definitely think a refund is in order....pitty the buyer.
|
|
|
Jul 28 2007, 10:26 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
20,901 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Miri, Sarawak |
QUOTE(Sandwich2U @ Jul 28 2007, 07:53 PM) Picture from Buyer Is tat a crack or a scratch..? So serious geh.. ![]() Pictures from Seller » Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... « @Viking, Your pictures didn't show the scratch part on the top part of the phone It is somewhat unfair to your potential buyers. How did you expect people know there is a hard scratch there ? From your statement If you weren't Elite Senior Member, i am pretty sure people won't do postage deal for your phone. He put his trust on you and you seriously disappointed him. |
|
|
Jul 28 2007, 10:46 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,138 posts Joined: Dec 2006 |
any comment from the seller yet???
|
|
|
Jul 28 2007, 11:35 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,695 posts Joined: Jan 2005 |
|
|
|
Jul 28 2007, 11:52 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,285 posts Joined: Mar 2007 |
lol 5% scratchless ar? tis is wat a trade enforcer sell a stuff to the buyer? come on man...the pix din show the blind spot..and i dun think u dunno there is god damn big hole there lor =.=" give some response lor ..or u think u shouldn't pay any responsibility on this thread? o_O or u wanna say the crack caused by the poor pos laju guy? lolz
This post has been edited by sam0919: Jul 28 2007, 11:54 PM |
|
|
Jul 29 2007, 12:06 AM
|
|
Forum Admin
44,415 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
that surely isn't a scratch.
|
|
|
Jul 29 2007, 12:17 AM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
239 posts Joined: Apr 2005 From: BM, Penang, Malaysia |
---Zip up lips--
This post has been edited by Dragonflyz: Jul 30 2007, 07:34 AM |
|
|
Jul 29 2007, 12:44 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,285 posts Joined: Mar 2007 |
lol word game =.= 95% scratchless doenst equal to crack ..its scratch not crack =.= walau like tis also can ...zha dou
*speechless This post has been edited by sam0919: Jul 29 2007, 12:45 AM |
|
|
Jul 29 2007, 12:55 AM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
56 posts Joined: Mar 2006 |
Don't you all think vikingw2k deserve a 'DISPUTE' tag as of now?
|
|
|
Jul 29 2007, 12:57 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,138 posts Joined: Dec 2006 |
|
|
|
Jul 29 2007, 01:58 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,242 posts Joined: Aug 2005 From: Sila Mampir,JB sTaTus:GTX 680 SLI |
|
|
|
Jul 29 2007, 02:14 AM
|
|
VIP
9,778 posts Joined: Jun 2005 From: KL(Wangsa Maju) , Seremban 2 |
Currently I'm at my hometown handling some stuff, will get back on this matter by tomorrow night
|
|
|
Jul 29 2007, 04:10 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
478 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Kuantan, PAHANG |
yaya, lets him do what 'more important' for him now
and i believe it is not new crack/scracth cause by the courier, one more for you all.. ![]() Added on July 29, 2007, 4:25 amand another one, so sorry if not very clear enuff.. ![]() Added on July 29, 2007, 4:35 amthe hold button for reference, thanks for all the comments.. ![]() Added on July 29, 2007, 4:51 amthis is pics taken from my several attempts to get clear pics before im using maro mode, thanks for viewing ![]() This post has been edited by ad_rv4: Jul 29 2007, 04:51 AM |
|
|
Jul 29 2007, 07:49 AM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
159 posts Joined: Aug 2005 From: Kuantan |
|
|
|
Jul 29 2007, 10:00 AM
|
|
Forum Admin
44,415 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
QUOTE(razzac @ Jul 29 2007, 07:49 AM) my goodness. razzac, your posts on this thread have so far been spams, this one included.who are you to say it's bad answer and response? at least people are doing their part to inform. tomorrow if he don't attend to it then you hentam la. QUOTE(bunta @ Jul 29 2007, 12:55 AM) DISPUTE tags are only awarded to people who refuse to settle the dispute. this is not the case, heck it's barely even 3 days since the thread started. QUOTE(budakdegilz @ Jul 29 2007, 12:57 AM) firstly it's not up to the moderator.secondly, DISPUTE tags are only awarded to people who refuse to settle the dispute. this is not the case, yet. you guys are really spammers. |
|
|
Jul 29 2007, 10:15 AM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
159 posts Joined: Aug 2005 From: Kuantan |
QUOTE(goldfries @ Jul 29 2007, 10:00 AM) my goodness. razzac, your posts on this thread have so far been spams, this one included. ok sorry boss...i just kesian kat mangsa penipuan internet ni..btw, tq.who are you to say it's bad answer and response? at least people are doing their part to inform. tomorrow if he don't attend to it then you hentam la. DISPUTE tags are only awarded to people who refuse to settle the dispute. this is not the case, heck it's barely even 3 days since the thread started. firstly it's not up to the moderator. secondly, DISPUTE tags are only awarded to people who refuse to settle the dispute. this is not the case, yet. you guys are really spammers. kesian kat ad_rv4, ribu tu...not hundred only....btw, hope u can get ur money back ad_rv4. This post has been edited by razzac: Jul 29 2007, 10:15 AM |
|
|
Jul 29 2007, 10:18 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
478 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Kuantan, PAHANG |
|
|
|
Jul 29 2007, 01:22 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,032 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: BBC Studios |
seller's "Elite" tag should be reconsidered if this dispute isn't solved in a proper way. It is very disappointing to see an Elite complained in the Trade Dispute Resolution Center.
|
|
|
Jul 29 2007, 03:23 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,491 posts Joined: Dec 2004 From: initrd |
@goldfries, u were right.. mostly people in here are plain spamming than posting concrete statements..
I am here not support which party is right or wrong. Just give the person some time to settle it in peacefully and good manner way. I am sure he will settle down this problem |
|
|
Jul 29 2007, 05:03 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
956 posts Joined: May 2006 From: Wichita / US |
From TS's photos, its really a phone which consider >15% dent / scratches. Besides, he as a trade enforcer and elite with plenty of trades which he had dealt successfully, shouldn't have made those mistakes by not taking the photo of the dental parts... Does that consider doing on purpose of not letting buyers know about the phone's proper condition? From what i see here, its really unfair for a buyer who have put all his trust to a guy who have some tags and fame there ended up with those dental parts buying that phone his hard earn money and trust from the tags.... Hope there will b some mods or even admins standing here judging this case fair and square by giving us, citizens of lowyat.net a fair judgment.
Cheers... |
|
|
Jul 29 2007, 05:26 PM
|
|
Forum Admin
44,415 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
QUOTE(razzac @ Jul 29 2007, 10:15 AM) ok sorry boss...i just kesian kat mangsa penipuan internet ni..btw, tq. tak kisah la you kesian or not, kesian kat ad_rv4, ribu tu...not hundred only....btw, hope u can get ur money back ad_rv4. 1. no need to kesian when case is not settled yet. 2. kesian doesn't give you any reason to spam. |
|
|
Jul 29 2007, 08:10 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
478 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Kuantan, PAHANG |
|
|
|
Jul 29 2007, 08:14 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,158 posts Joined: Apr 2005 From: -Butterworth, Penang- |
viking is online on 7pm but did not respond to this thread
|
|
|
Jul 29 2007, 09:59 PM
|
|
VIP
9,778 posts Joined: Jun 2005 From: KL(Wangsa Maju) , Seremban 2 |
If you guys go through my thread, I'm mentioned on my title that my phone's condition is 95% Like New and majority of you people would say from the pictures it really looks like new. Actually what's the 95%? It's my own personal justification of the condition of the phone. On top of my own personal justification of the condition, I too uploaded a few pictures taken from the few angels I usually snap (Front, Left, Right, Back, Full Set, Hand) so that my potential buyers can get better picture of the overall condition instead of guessing my 95%. I rate this phone as 95%, but another person might take it as say maybe 80%, or maybe they rather use 9/10 and who knows some fussy dude might rate it as 50%.The point is there's no exact method used to measure the scratches on a phone, it's all based on the seller's personal justification.
QUOTE av_rv4 - vikingw2k Here, you are telling me that you are dissatisfied with the condition of my phone which i claimed as 95% Like New because base on your own personal opinion, you only rate it as 80%. bro, the asus p525 pda i received today at noon, the system is running ok, but im not satisfied with the outlook u claim as 95% condition, for me its only 80% and below The question is, did i mislead you by telling you something FALSE which can be measured to check whether it's TRUE or FALSE? I'm merely telling you my personal justification of the condition of the phone which is very subjective. Some might take it as normal wear and tear, some fussy ones might take it seriously. There's no standard way to measure whether my statement is TRUE or FALSE. » Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... « I tried to provide overall view of the items I'm selling by - uploading pictures snapped from the normal angles that i usually snap which i think sufficient to provide an overview condition to the potential buyer before they COD with me . The picture posting methods are the same all these while, please refer to here and check all my sales thread. For phones, I'll upload Front, Back, Left and Right, Full set, also Hand. More pictures will be uploaded IF the buyer request specifically which he didn't do so. You may question several forummers who've dealt with me before, I'll purposely snap a macro shot of the part of the requested by the buyer if they requested for it. So don't purposely point fingers asking why I didn't upload top and bottom pictures? Simply because I usually upload 6 pictures and so far most of my buyers got a clear view of the items I'm selling. You may question them. - providing COD so that buyers can meet up , test kaw kaw, judge the condition themselves and ONLY take if they think that the condition satisfy their own personal standard., I've sold quite a number of stuff, there are certain deals where the buyer chose to call off the deal when it's not up to their own personal standard. If i were to mislead you, wouldn't it be much easier by - just mention on my thread, "Item is in good working condition", and don't upload any pictures so that you would do the guessing? - post some pictures, and try to blur the tear and wear e.g. the button, and photoshop some other visible minor tear and wear making it look like a perfect phone? - say NO COD, ONLY BANK IN- POSTAGE. so that you can't see the actual condition of the phone until you receive it. - uploading a few blur pictures taken by cheap skate camera phones instead of uploading macro shots snapped using a 10Megapixel DSLR + 3cm Macro Lens? Have a random click around the Trade Zone, ask yourself, how many sellers would upload 7 Clear photos snapped clearly using DSLR? What if i buy phone from them, and ask for a refund just because I'm not satisfied with how the seller rate his item saying that "In my opinion, I think your phone condition is only 50% not up to what i expected, so please refund me cause I'm not satisfied with how you rate the condition of your item" Isn't that ridiculous? Why not i just meet up with him to see the actual condition of the item and judge myself, if I'm not satisfied with how he rate his phone condition. I would have just call off the deal and thank him for willing to meet up to let me have a look at the condition before i commit the deal. If I'm busy and can't meet up to see the actual item, alternatively i could request the seller to provide as much clear pictures of the item so that i can judge by my own. QUOTE(suicideroach @ Jul 27 2007, 11:00 PM) For a seller, it is a good way to promote their item and show the picture as mint as possible (marketing strategy, rite?) but if his customer wants him to show all the item's part condition, then the seller is liable to show it. Yes, but he didn't request me to snap more macro photos of the phone.QUOTE(KTCY @ Jul 27 2007, 11:00 PM) My point of view is that seller should have snap the scratch area and let the buyer to judge it himself. I think vikingw2k didn't show that part. QUOTE(ptewee @ Jul 27 2007, 11:05 PM) yes... vikingw2k should have shown photos of every basic angle... but i didnt see any photos of the top of the pda... if u want to sell an item u shud convince ppl dat it is totally like how u described it by showing pictures of every part of the phone... and u jus opt to leave out the photo of the top part... I would have snapped more pictures IF he request me for it. and NO, I didn't opt to leave the photo of the top. All these while I didn't upload the TOP and also the BOTTOM picture. p/s: It's hilarious to see a few forummers taking this miserable chance to seek revenge by flaming and framing me up saying "don't trade with me and bla bla" when I'm having a discussion here with another forummer. Yes, I know I've closed your threads or reported you for warning, could you guys grow up and learn your mistakes? You wouldn't need to go through those if you guys are obedient and be a good boy by not going against the Trade Zone's R&R |
|
|
Jul 29 2007, 10:03 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
478 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Kuantan, PAHANG |
you are childish, u cannot accept your own mistakes.. still wanna make another story ka???
|
|
|
Jul 29 2007, 10:06 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
478 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Kuantan, PAHANG |
|
|
|
Jul 29 2007, 10:07 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,158 posts Joined: Apr 2005 From: -Butterworth, Penang- |
viking,
i not here to flame you...but if i were you..and i know there is a huge mark ..i would snap the area and let ppl know and state 95% scracthless....then at least ppl can judge whether is that consider 5% scratches or more and bargain with u.... i think the phone not really 95% scracthes as many ppl here also say horible include senior member and even mod himself |
|
|
Jul 29 2007, 10:19 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
478 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Kuantan, PAHANG |
i know u just now searching for sentences/phrases of what i wrote and from others that hv points for you to backup yourself but the truth is you got no points against me..try harder
|
|
|
Jul 29 2007, 10:24 PM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
176 posts Joined: Jun 2005 |
hup maybe u can said that it is 95% like new and other might well said 1% or 99% new rite?
but form my point of view, the buyer did ask which part are the 5%. and u just simply mention refer to ur pic...which doesnt show the "scratch" rite? does it fair? |
|
|
Jul 29 2007, 10:29 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
478 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Kuantan, PAHANG |
if seller answers my question, for sure i ask him to snap pics at that part, n confirm dun wan to buy after that!
|
|
|
Jul 29 2007, 10:33 PM
|
|
VIP
9,778 posts Joined: Jun 2005 From: KL(Wangsa Maju) , Seremban 2 |
QUOTE(ad_rv4 @ Jul 29 2007, 10:03 PM) You don't need to paste the screenshot of our conversation, I've pasted it on the first few post earlier on when you created this thread. Could you point out which phrase of mine is "making another story" as you claimed?It would be better if you could provide facts whenever you speak. Don't simply accuse people via baseless statement. QUOTE(stevenlee @ Jul 29 2007, 10:07 PM) viking, The best solution that i provided to let my customer to know the actual condition is by COD as different people interpret differently on about picture.i not here to flame you...but if i were you..and i know there is a huge mark ..i would snap the area and let ppl know and state 95% scracthless....then at least ppl can judge whether is that consider 5% scratches or more and bargain with u.... i think the phone not really 95% scracthes as many ppl here also say horible include senior member and even mod himself p/s: Read properly, I said the overall condition of the phone is 95% Like New. Some might agree some might not agree as it's subjective and NO ONE can say it's wrong or right. That's why I offered COD for you guys to see and judge yourself whether to commit the deal or not. This post has been edited by vikingw2k: Jul 29 2007, 10:35 PM |
|
|
Jul 29 2007, 10:37 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
478 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Kuantan, PAHANG |
i refering to this one laa..
Yes, but he didn't request me to snap more macro photos of the phone. u try to make like u innocent???? can you??? try harder |
|
|
Jul 29 2007, 10:41 PM
|
|
Elite
5,434 posts Joined: Dec 2006 |
viking,u can say base on ur personal opinion.
then i can just say the phone is 99% good condition base on my OPINION? anyway,look at the pic of TS posted,the bottom part,got a lot of dropped scar and the top CRACKED parts and u said it's 95%? come on man,TS trusted u so far because u have ur two tag over there and u judge the PDA with 95% good condition?come on,r u crazy or what?cheating ppl by telling ppl it's 95%? 95% means only got one invisible scratched,but the damaged is totally visible even see through the pics that posted,u know,a damage that can see with pic is terrible damaged already,normally 5% damaged are not visible through photo.(N73 pic quality) Dont judge by ur own opinion and feeling,because of ur two tag over there,u CHEATED ppl by not telling the buyer the actual damaged of the phone. Refund him if u r a good seller,obviosuly,if u r him,would u happy to receive a 95% good condition phone by a safe trader and a Trade Enforcer with a lot of damaged and cracked? tell us,if u r him,what will u feel? a business is a business,but reputation is reputation.Good luck TS. |
|
|
Jul 29 2007, 10:45 PM
|
![]()
Newbie
0 posts Joined: May 2007 |
lost hope in these kind of Trade Enforcers aka Viking.. only know to say that he use to snap 6 pics then he is a free scammer...
ppl trust u dats y they can deal via bank in... cracks consider 95%?? wat the fak? shame on you dude.. its true some ppl said viking is so sombong in his T&C.. so wat? wanna warn me or ban, @sshole.. and MODS ppl have the right to speak... u MODS shud be proud of urself for having a 'Good' Trade Enforcer... |
|
|
Jul 29 2007, 10:45 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,138 posts Joined: Dec 2006 |
QUOTE(vikingw2k @ Jul 29 2007, 10:33 PM) ....................................... wonder if any of u guys here have same opinion as the seller??? say it 95% like new?? i personally vote for NO...p/s: Read properly, I said the overall condition of the phone is 95% Like New. Some might agree some might not agree as it's subjective and NO ONE can say it's wrong or right. That's why I offered COD for you guys to see and judge yourself whether to commit the deal or not. |
|
|
Jul 29 2007, 10:54 PM
|
|
VIP
9,778 posts Joined: Jun 2005 From: KL(Wangsa Maju) , Seremban 2 |
Few days before i posted this phone to TS, I've COD-ed with a few forummers who came to my house, check my item for sale and some even online using my pc. They saw the phone and most of them told me that it's just like new. you can PM gtoforce about this. Also I've just chat with the previous owner who sold this phone to me. He admitted that he dropped the phone on the floor, I sent him the picture taken by you, he DENIED that it's that bad like the picture when he sold it to me. Also until the very last day, I've another forummer who came and toyed around with my phone right before I post it via poslaju to TS. He too was shocked after seeing the picture that you snapped. It wasn't that bad when I got it back from the previous seller (fullbl4de), the condition is just like new (gtoforce) who came to my house few days later to COD with me, and the very last day before i sent it out to you, (elvin87) toyed around with it and he too said that the condition is not like the picture you've shown. Also, a forummer (leeyuleong), came all the way from Cheras to my house to have a look on my set, he only remembered the most obvious thing is the tear and wear on the button after testing and considered about it. He didn't notice any bad cracks on the top.
Well, I don't wanna point my fingers to anybody. » Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... « This post has been edited by vikingw2k: Jul 29 2007, 11:05 PM |
|
|
Jul 29 2007, 10:56 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,651 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
ok..let me say something fair here...We guys know the consequences of buying online and not COD.
And this problem is very subjective.It's very hard to judge.I know viking has many issue before this.But previous issue not related to this one. Here i suggest viking to refund to the buyer..and both share the cost of courier. Why?Both trading online.Both at fault. And wat viking need to do after refund and get the pda. Sell it back in garage at rm 1.2 k with full pictures of the crack. I believe it's cheap and definetely there will be a buyer.If there is a buyer..The real problem will be solve and the seller name will be cleared as well... end of story...topic close |
|
|
Jul 29 2007, 10:57 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
888 posts Joined: Aug 2005 From: Segambut |
QUOTE(vikingw2k @ Jul 29 2007, 10:54 PM) Few days before i posted this phone to TS, I've COD-ed with a few forummers who came to my house, check my item for sale and some even online using my pc. They saw the phone and most of them told me that it's just like new. you can PM gtoforce about this. Also I've just chat with the previous owner who sold this phone to me. He admitted that he dropped the phone on the floor, I sent him the picture taken by you, he DENIED that it's that bad like the picture when he sold it to me. Also until the very last day, I've another forummer who came and toyed around with my phone right before I post it via poslaju to TS. He too was shocked after seeing the picture that you snapped. It wasn't that bad when I got it back from the previous seller (fullbl4de), the condition is just like new (gtoforce) who came to my house few days later to COD with me, and the very last day before i sent it out to you, (elvin87) toyed around with it and he too said that the condition is not like the picture you've shown. Also, a forummer (leeyuleong), came all the way from Cheras to my house to have a look on my set, he only remembered the most obvious thing is the tear and wear on the button after testing and considered about it. He didn't notice any bad cracks on the top. i think we need all the forumers that u mention above to clarify what u said here....Well, I don't wanna point my fingers to anybody. |
|
|
Jul 29 2007, 10:59 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,651 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
QUOTE(vikingw2k @ Jul 29 2007, 10:54 PM) Few days before i posted this phone to TS, I've COD-ed with a few forummers who came to my house, check my item for sale and some even online using my pc. They saw the phone and most of them told me that it's just like new. you can PM gtoforce about this. Also I've just chat with the previous owner who sold this phone to me. He admitted that he dropped the phone on the floor, I sent him the picture taken by you, he DENIED that it's that bad like the picture when he sold it to me. Also until the very last day, I've another forummer who came and toyed around with my phone right before I post it via poslaju to TS. He too was shocked after seeing the picture that you snapped. It wasn't that bad when I got it back from the previous seller (fullbl4de), the condition is just like new (gtoforce) who came to my house few days later to COD with me, and the very last day before i sent it out to you, (elvin87) toyed around with it and he too said that the condition is not like the picture you've shown. Also, a forummer (leeyuleong), came all the way from Cheras to my house to have a look on my set, he only remembered the most obvious thing is the tear and wear on the button after testing and considered about it. He didn't notice any bad cracks on the top. i dont really buy the fact above..u mentioned it out..but u said u dun want to point fingers at anyone.Well, I don't wanna point my fingers to anybody. what the buyer and seller need now is a solution. |
|
|
Jul 29 2007, 11:01 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
478 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Kuantan, PAHANG |
wow, now finding alibi's, i wonder if the ending will be blame on my mistakes??? poor sad for newbie like me..
|
|
|
Jul 29 2007, 11:05 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
12,505 posts Joined: May 2007 From: Triumph in the Skies Status:In LoV3 Again |
QUOTE(budakdegilz @ Jul 29 2007, 10:45 PM) wonder if any of u guys here have same opinion as the seller??? say it 95% like new?? i personally vote for NO... A good seller will tell everything they know about the stuff they sell.I think vikingw2k is pushing away his responsibility for this QUOTE(vikingw2k @ Jul 29 2007, 10:54 PM) Few days before i posted this phone to TS, I've COD-ed with a few forummers who came to my house, check my item for sale and some even online using my pc. They saw the phone and most of them told me that it's just like new. you can PM gtoforce about this. Also I've just chat with the previous owner who sold this phone to me. He admitted that he dropped the phone on the floor, I sent him the picture taken by you, he DENIED that it's that bad like the picture when he sold it to me. Also until the very last day, I've another forummer who came and toyed around with my phone right before I post it via poslaju to TS. He too was shocked after seeing the picture that you snapped. It wasn't that bad when I got it back from the previous seller (fullbl4de), the condition is just like new (gtoforce) who came to my house few days later to COD with me, and the very last day before i sent it out to you, (elvin87) toyed around with it and he too said that the condition is not like the picture you've shown. Also, a forummer (leeyuleong), came all the way from Cheras to my house to have a look on my set, he only remembered the most obvious thing is the tear and wear on the button after testing and considered about it. He didn't notice any bad cracks on the top. Now more people getting themselves involve in this case ya ? Well, I don't wanna point my fingers to anybody. |
|
|
Jul 29 2007, 11:12 PM
|
![]()
Newbie
0 posts Joined: May 2007 |
ya poor u ad_rv.. hope u can get ur cash back..
they Elite are just toying newbies around... wat he show theere is useless.. unless u ask everyone to comment here u moron. |
|
|
Jul 29 2007, 11:14 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,651 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
QUOTE(ad_rv4 @ Jul 29 2007, 11:01 PM) wow, now finding alibi's, i wonder if the ending will be blame on my mistakes??? poor sad for newbie like me.. » Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... « editted for the above.my mistake,sorryIt's ur writing style hihi.So u are clean. For Viking,it's expected that the buyer will push the responsibility on the seller and vice versa.You blame him made the scratch and i blame u made the scratch.Common thing. Expected in online sales. So more people joining this problem? i suggest the moderator to check the IP log file in this topic. This post has been edited by Malaysian: Jul 29 2007, 11:20 PM |
|
|
Jul 29 2007, 11:23 PM
|
|
VIP
9,778 posts Joined: Jun 2005 From: KL(Wangsa Maju) , Seremban 2 |
QUOTE(Malaysian @ Jul 29 2007, 11:14 PM) » Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... « editted for the above.my mistake,sorryIt's ur writing style hihi.So u are clean. For Viking,it's expected that the buyer will push the responsibility on the seller and vice versa.You blame him made the scratch and i blame u made the scratch.Common thing. Expected in online sales. So more people joining this problem? i suggest the moderator to check the IP log file in this topic. |
|
|
Jul 29 2007, 11:27 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
764 posts Joined: Mar 2007 From: ur HDD (im the latest virus) |
QUOTE(vikingw2k @ Jul 29 2007, 11:23 PM) It's not more people joining this problem. Blaming each other will not solve this dispute. That's the reason I'm providing facts to support my statements instead of bla-ing nonsense. maybe u can PM everyone that u mention to come hereand i think ur tag should be "digantung" first until this case is solved |
|
|
Jul 29 2007, 11:29 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,651 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
QUOTE(vikingw2k @ Jul 29 2007, 11:23 PM) It's not more people joining this problem. Blaming each other will not solve this dispute. That's the reason I'm providing facts to support my statements instead of bla-ing nonsense. ok,from what the statement u wrote,the pda's scratch is not as bad as before u deliver it to the seller.So it's the seller that made the scratch? Is that ur statement?If so, you have the responsibility to summon witnesses into here.It's not the seller responsibility for now. The problem now is " The seller want a refund" and the buyer say " before i sold to him,it's not that bad or i posted the full picture" |
|
|
Jul 29 2007, 11:33 PM
|
|
VIP
9,778 posts Joined: Jun 2005 From: KL(Wangsa Maju) , Seremban 2 |
QUOTE(Malaysian @ Jul 29 2007, 11:29 PM) ok,from what the statement u wrote,the pda's scratch is not as bad as before u deliver it to the seller. Click the spoiler hereSo it's the seller that made the scratch? Is that ur statement?If so, you have the responsibility to summon witnesses into here.It's not the seller responsibility for now. The problem now is " The seller want a refund" and the buyer say " before i sold to him,it's not that bad or i posted the full picture" I've PM-ed gtoforce to speak here. I'll try to contact the rest. |
|
|
Jul 29 2007, 11:35 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
478 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Kuantan, PAHANG |
haha, as i expected, now blame on me, me make the scratch at the hidden parts???? wow i am a pro's, now you are become big liar man..
|
|
|
Jul 29 2007, 11:38 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,651 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
this will be a complicated high profile case in lyn history.
|
|
|
Jul 29 2007, 11:38 PM
|
|
Staff
72,930 posts Joined: Sep 2005 From: KUL |
QUOTE(vikingw2k @ Jul 29 2007, 09:59 PM) Viking, I'm being neutral in this case, hope it can be solved as soon as possible and peacefully.Okay, since we don't know the cracked part is caused by who, so I ignore it for now. Let me point out back the statement you made above by putting an attachment here. Please refer to it. Okay, I'm not flaming whoever here. Please okay, I'm scared. This post has been edited by fruitie: Jul 29 2007, 11:39 PM Attached thumbnail(s) |
|
|
Jul 29 2007, 11:40 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
478 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Kuantan, PAHANG |
when its involved with as known as 'elite members' and 'trade enforcers', but when come to newbie easily give bad tags, haha..
|
|
|
Jul 29 2007, 11:41 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,651 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
QUOTE(ad_rv4 @ Jul 29 2007, 11:35 PM) haha, as i expected, now blame on me, me make the scratch at the hidden parts???? wow i am a pro's, now you are become big liar man.. dont worry.There will be justice.The buyer still lose a point to you which he posted non full picture of the pda in the selling thread. |
|
|
Jul 29 2007, 11:42 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
478 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Kuantan, PAHANG |
QUOTE(fruitie @ Jul 29 2007, 11:38 PM) Viking, I'm being neutral in this case, hope it can be solved as soon as possible and peacefully. dude, thats is my point Okay, since we don't know the cracked part is caused by who, so I ignore it for now. Let me point out back the statement you made above by putting an attachment here. Please refer to it. Okay, I'm not flaming whoever here. Please okay, I'm scared. |
|
|
Jul 29 2007, 11:42 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,651 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
QUOTE(fruitie @ Jul 29 2007, 11:38 PM) Viking, I'm being neutral in this case, hope it can be solved as soon as possible and peacefully. yes this is where the buyer has the credibility more than the seller for the time being.Okay, since we don't know the cracked part is caused by who, so I ignore it for now. Let me point out back the statement you made above by putting an attachment here. Please refer to it. Okay, I'm not flaming whoever here. Please okay, I'm scared. |
|
|
Jul 29 2007, 11:48 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
323 posts Joined: Jun 2006 From: You spelt "Harbl" wrongly and it wasn't a typo |
QUOTE(fruitie @ Jul 29 2007, 11:38 PM) Viking, I'm being neutral in this case, hope it can be solved as soon as possible and peacefully. I agree with you. That statement from him alone states that there are no other physical damage to the phone. Didn't expect dishonest trading from a Trade Enforcer himself. Seems to be the 2nd time he's on the dispute forum. Correct me if I'm wrong.Okay, since we don't know the cracked part is caused by who, so I ignore it for now. Let me point out back the statement you made above by putting an attachment here. Please refer to it. Okay, I'm not flaming whoever here. Please okay, I'm scared. This post has been edited by jcheong: Jul 29 2007, 11:49 PM |
|
|
Jul 29 2007, 11:49 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
12,505 posts Joined: May 2007 From: Triumph in the Skies Status:In LoV3 Again |
QUOTE(fruitie @ Jul 29 2007, 11:38 PM) Viking, I'm being neutral in this case, hope it can be solved as soon as possible and peacefully. Great point. What say you now Mr vikingw2k. I think refund is a must to TS to prove that you're a responsible seller and a good Trade Enforcer. Okay, since we don't know the cracked part is caused by who, so I ignore it for now. Let me point out back the statement you made above by putting an attachment here. Please refer to it. Okay, I'm not flaming whoever here. Please okay, I'm scared. |
|
|
Jul 29 2007, 11:51 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
478 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Kuantan, PAHANG |
so, the seller hv asked the previous owner and the owner confirm said the PDA got dropped before, thanks seller
|
|
|
Jul 29 2007, 11:55 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
5,417 posts Joined: May 2006 From: Bear Hill, Malacca |
oh, viking now got a problem? lucky that other time he ffk-ed me on the k800i few months back.. never heard from him since i agree to buy his phone.
anyways, good luck to ts. even though you are newbie, don't be afraid la. they are all fair people, i mean the mods. just bring out every point you have and discuss... cheers! |
|
|
Jul 29 2007, 11:56 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,651 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
QUOTE(KTCY @ Jul 29 2007, 11:49 PM) Great point. What say you now Mr vikingw2k. I think refund is a must to TS to prove that you're a responsible seller and a good Trade Enforcer. the only way to clear his name now is to refund and sell back in lyn with full pictures.And this is the only way.I provided a solution in previous page already. |
|
|
Jul 29 2007, 11:59 PM
|
|
VIP
9,778 posts Joined: Jun 2005 From: KL(Wangsa Maju) , Seremban 2 |
QUOTE av_rv4 - vikingw2k As you can see here, he did asked me which part is scratches, I've answered his question by telling him to refer to the picture for the overall view as i believe my picture could tell him almost the overall condition of the phone. If he asked me for more pictures of the scratches, I would have snap pictures of all the scratches just like what i did in my deals before this.bro, i juz back home, confirm wan to buy this pda, can u reserved me till 2morrow???? got prove of ori receipt??? 95% like new so which part is stracth??? p/s: Please do not ask me why i didn't upload the picture of top part of my phone, I've mentioned on my earlier post. Usually I'll only snap 6 pictures which is Left, Right, Back, Front, Full Set, Hand. I've no intention to leave the Top nor the Bottom. Don't use that as a lame excuse to accuse me of trying to skip the top part. QUOTE(ad_rv4 @ Jul 29 2007, 11:51 PM) so, the seller hv asked the previous owner and the owner confirm said the PDA got dropped before, thanks seller Yes, but he too confirmed that the damage wasn't that bad when he dropped the phone and I'm waiting for a few forummers to explain here.This post has been edited by vikingw2k: Jul 30 2007, 12:03 AM |
|
|
Jul 30 2007, 12:02 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
5,417 posts Joined: May 2006 From: Bear Hill, Malacca |
but you could just tell him the top part is scratched right? don't say picture la, if it takes so much time to take another one.... just tell him the top part is scratched is not that hard i think...
|
|
|
Jul 30 2007, 12:04 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
12,505 posts Joined: May 2007 From: Triumph in the Skies Status:In LoV3 Again |
QUOTE(vikingw2k @ Jul 29 2007, 11:59 PM) As you can see here, he did asked me which part is scratches, I've answered his question by telling him to refer to the picture for the overall view as i believe my picture could tell him almost the overall condition of the phone. If he asked me for more pictures of the scratches, I would have snap pictures of all the scratches just like what i did in my deals before this. @ bold sentence, if you are a good and responsible trader with elite title and trade enforcer title, you should have show him. Not buyer ask you snap then only you do. This just show that how irresponsible you are on trading goods. p/s: Please do not ask me why i didn't upload the picture of top part of my phone, I've mentioned on my earlier post. Usually I'll only snap 6 pictures which is Left, Right, Back, Front, Full Set, Hand. I've no intention to leave the Top nor the Bottom. Don't use that as a lame excuse to accuse me of trying to skip the top part. Overall condition but without the scratches part ? If you're in his shoes, will you be happy with this ? Think about it. Now you're just trying to push all the responsibility away. Nice try but it just show how irresponsible you are. |
|
|
Jul 30 2007, 12:05 AM
|
|
Forum Admin
44,415 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
ok this thread doesn't have to reach 6 pages.
viking, the issue is simple. you KNOW there was a dent. yet you did not mention it to the potential buyer. sure, you can say he did not ask you but don't you have the sense of responsibility to inform? i mean this is not small scratch la, you wouldn't want seller to sell you things like that either. QUOTE(vikingw2k @ Jul 29 2007, 09:59 PM) ........I rate this phone as 95%, but another person might take it as say maybe 80%, or maybe they rather use 9/10 and who knows some fussy dude might rate it as 50%.The point is there's no exact method used to measure the scratches on a phone, it's all based on the seller's personal justification. why rate it in the first place then? Here, you are telling me that you are dissatisfied with the condition of my phone which i claimed as 95% Like New because base on your own personal opinion, you only rate it as 80%. ..... the point of this debate was not about the %. it's about you not telling the buyer about that part. IMO you should apologize for not informing on that part and resolve how to accomodate this issue, not justifying away. it's clear that you did not inform of that part. simple as that. --------- 2 things i see 1. full refund, covering postage to buyer 2. partial refund, give buyer discount due to that part which the buyer did not agree to receive. --------- and to the rest of you idiots who just to spam and flame, this is NOT funny and i'm going to take action as well if you guys don't quit your act. just because i share my opinion which is against Viking for this case, that doesn't mean you barge in and talk crap and all. |
|
|
Jul 30 2007, 12:06 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,651 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
the seller should tell the buyer which part is scratched by mentioning the hardest scratch which is the top part.It's common sense and dont need to post picture.
Since taikor come in here..case close already.Im not idiot.Read wat i posted.Some of u in here gonna get ban but definitely not me. So dont spam and flame in important topic.Case consider close This post has been edited by Malaysian: Jul 30 2007, 12:08 AM |
|
|
Jul 30 2007, 12:07 AM
|
|
Forum Admin
44,415 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
QUOTE(Malaysian @ Jul 30 2007, 12:06 AM) the seller should tell the buyer which part is scratched by mentioning the hardest scratch which is the top part.It's common sense and dont need to post picture. don't need to request also ler. such big thing, if i were seller i would tell straightaway to avoid getting into shitty situation like this. mind you it's not a scratch. |
|
|
Jul 30 2007, 12:07 AM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
176 posts Joined: Jun 2005 |
yerp i agree. full refund to buyer~
i me myself...selling non-faulty item, then suddenly the buyer post a pic with a new hole on the item that i sell, obviously on the spot i will rrefuse and fight that the hole are not there when selling it, not wait until everyone think that im the bad person in the deal. and of coz at the same time looking for witness. |
|
|
Jul 30 2007, 12:07 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,625 posts Joined: Dec 2005 |
QUOTE(vikingw2k @ Jul 29 2007, 11:59 PM) As you can see here, he did asked me which part is scratches, I've answered his question by telling him to refer to the picture for the overall view as i believe my picture could tell him almost the overall condition of the phone. If he asked me for more pictures of the scratches, I would have snap pictures of all the scratches just like what i did in my deals before this. Bro, when you got it from previous owner, you asked him about the crack on the top. Why? Because it was obviously ugly to have such a big crack which got into your attention. p/s: Please do not ask me why i didn't upload the picture of top part of my phone, I've mentioned on my earlier post. Usually I'll only snap 6 pictures which is Left, Right, Back, Front, Full Set, Hand. I've no intention to leave the Top nor the Bottom. Don't use that as a lame excuse to accuse me of trying to skip the top part. But how come when you sell the PDA, it was not mentioned clearly? You should know that others will realise about the crack as how u realised it. So you should have mentioned about the crack IN DETAIL/CLEARLY. You didn't do it & just asked TS to refer to the photo where the crack is not snapped. It's definitely unethical. 2ndly, you did mention that there are many other buyers who saw your phone & agreed that it looked new. So are you trying to say that the crack was that obvious when you shipped the PDA? It clearly contradict with your conversation with previous owner of the PDA. This post has been edited by ViRaViRa: Jul 30 2007, 12:09 AM |
|
|
Jul 30 2007, 12:08 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
323 posts Joined: Jun 2006 From: You spelt "Harbl" wrongly and it wasn't a typo |
QUOTE(vikingw2k @ Jul 29 2007, 11:59 PM) As you can see here, he did asked me which part is scratches, I've answered his question by telling him to refer to the picture for the overall view as i believe my picture could tell him almost the overall condition of the phone. If he asked me for more pictures of the scratches, I would have snap pictures of all the scratches just like what i did in my deals before this. You wouldn't be satisfied if you got an answer like that when you're trying to buy a phone right? He asked "95% like new so which part is stracth???" then you mentioned he could see them from the pictures which you knew there wasn't any on them.p/s: Please do not ask me why i didn't upload the picture of top part of my phone, I've mentioned on my earlier post. Usually I'll only snap 6 pictures which is Left, Right, Back, Front, Full Set, Hand. I've no intention to leave the Top nor the Bottom. Don't use that as a lame excuse to accuse me of trying to skip the top part. "If he asked me for more pictures of the scratches, I would have snap pictures of all the scratches just like what i did in my deals before this." He did ask for it. Bolded text. Common sense la, this is the internet. If he was buying the phone from your shop he could see the whole phone but as a seller trading online shouldn't you inform the seller first of the major scratches and let him decide later rather than letting this thread even exist. |
|
|
Jul 30 2007, 12:11 AM
|
|
VIP
9,778 posts Joined: Jun 2005 From: KL(Wangsa Maju) , Seremban 2 |
QUOTE(goldfries @ Jul 30 2007, 12:05 AM) ok this thread doesn't have to reach 6 pages. Which statement says "that i knew there was a dent?", please check out my beginning post until now, did i even admit that i saw a dent there? I was very shocked to see the seller's picture. That's why i didn't reply anything or start accusing blindly, and what i did was start questioning those people who saw that pdaphone before. If they said that it's really that bad when it was with me, then I would have admitted it.viking, the issue is simple. you KNOW there was a dent. yet you did not mention it to the potential buyer. sure, you can say he did not ask you but don't you have the sense of responsibility to inform? i mean this is not small scratch la, you wouldn't want seller to sell you things like that either. QUOTE why rate it in the first place then? I've already explained clearly, when i got it back, it was in very good condition. That's the reason i rated it as 95%. How many % i give is not that important. Afterall I've provide pictures and also offer COD so that the buyers can check it out themselves and commit if they wanted to.p/s: You guys start to accuse as if I made the scratches. Don't you guys understand now, The point is, when i got it back, It wasn't like what in the picture, it's just some normal not so obvious normal wear and tear leading me rated it as 95%. This post has been edited by vikingw2k: Jul 30 2007, 12:14 AM |
|
|
Jul 30 2007, 12:11 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,651 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
QUOTE(goldfries @ Jul 30 2007, 12:07 AM) don't need to request also ler. such big thing, if i were seller i would tell straightaway to avoid getting into shitty situation like this. of course i know that.But u as a moderator.I need to monitor many stuff.I read all the stuff in here and i dun question your job as moderator as well.mind you it's not a scratch. But it seems that the seller trying to say or divert it countering by saying " the scratch is not as bad before he sell to pda to the seller" Get my point?So there are something wrong with the seller. anyway this case consider close. |
|
|
Jul 30 2007, 12:14 AM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
159 posts Joined: Aug 2005 From: Kuantan |
QUOTE(ViRaViRa @ Jul 30 2007, 12:07 AM) Bro, when you got it from previous owner, you asked him about the crack on the top. Why? Because it was obviously ugly to have such a big crack which got into your attention. agreed with u...But how come when you sell the PDA, it was not mentioned clearly? You should know that others will realise about the crack as how u realised it. So you should have mentioned about the crack IN DETAIL/CLEARLY. You didn't do it & just asked TS to refer to the photo where the crack is not snapped. It's definitely unethical. 2ndly, you did mention that there are many other buyers who saw your phone & agreed that it looked new. So are you trying to say that the crack was that obvious when you shipped the PDA? It clearly contradict with your conversation with previous owner of the PDA. |
|
|
Jul 30 2007, 12:14 AM
|
|
Forum Admin
44,415 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
QUOTE(Malaysian @ Jul 30 2007, 12:11 AM) of course i know that.But u as a moderator.I need to monitor many stuff.I read all the stuff in here and i dun question your job as moderator as well. i think you misunderstood my post. (i should've used proper English)But it seems that the seller trying to say or divert it countering by saying " the scratch is not as bad before he sell to pda to the seller" Get my point?So there are something wrong with the seller. anyway this case consider close. my point is that even the buyer doesn't need to request such details, shouldn't even have to.. the buyer isn't psychic. |
|
|
Jul 30 2007, 12:16 AM
|
|
VIP
9,778 posts Joined: Jun 2005 From: KL(Wangsa Maju) , Seremban 2 |
QUOTE(Malaysian @ Jul 30 2007, 12:11 AM) of course i know that.But u as a moderator.I need to monitor many stuff.I read all the stuff in here and i dun question your job as moderator as well. The truth is, I don't notice a bad crack like that when i got it back. I got it back with slight scratches just like what the previous seller told me. That's the reason i just remain silent about the scratches until I've asked back the seller and a few others to confirm.But it seems that the seller trying to say or divert it countering by saying " the scratch is not as bad before he sell to pda to the seller" Get my point?So there are something wrong with the seller. anyway this case consider close. |
|
|
Jul 30 2007, 12:18 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
12,505 posts Joined: May 2007 From: Triumph in the Skies Status:In LoV3 Again |
QUOTE(goldfries @ Jul 30 2007, 12:14 AM) i think you misunderstood my post. (i should've used proper English) Agree. A good seller should have provide all the scratches photos by himself and not upon request of the buyer. For a trader like vikingw2k, whom signature said everything about his trading in LYN, I'd say that he might know the condition of the phone just that he hiding the fact. my point is that even the buyer doesn't need to request such details, shouldn't even have to.. the buyer isn't psychic. |
|
|
Jul 30 2007, 12:18 AM
|
|
Forum Admin
44,415 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
QUOTE(vikingw2k @ Jul 30 2007, 12:16 AM) The truth is, I don't notice a bad crack like that when i got it back. I got it back with slight scratches just like what the previous seller told me. That's the reason i just remain silent about the scratches until I've asked back the seller and a few others to confirm. ok. so now more importantly, how are you planning to settle this matter? |
|
|
Jul 30 2007, 12:23 AM
|
|
VIP
9,778 posts Joined: Jun 2005 From: KL(Wangsa Maju) , Seremban 2 |
QUOTE(goldfries @ Jul 30 2007, 12:18 AM) ok. I'm still trying to contact the few forummers to come here to proof that this pda phone is in good condition before i posted it via poslaju. That's my responsibility as a seller, which is to ensure my item is in good condition before sending out. Whatever happened after that is beyond my concern, unless there's any defect caused by me and i wouldn't wanna point fingers or simply accuse what caused the damage on the top of the pdaphone which suppose to be just minor normal wear and tear. so now more importantly, how are you planning to settle this matter? This post has been edited by vikingw2k: Jul 30 2007, 12:24 AM |
|
|
Jul 30 2007, 12:24 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,651 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
QUOTE(goldfries @ Jul 30 2007, 12:14 AM) i think you misunderstood my post. (i should've used proper English) No it's my fault for not explaining clearly.I get what u say.But as u know,The problem shifted to another stage of problem.my point is that even the buyer doesn't need to request such details, shouldn't even have to.. the buyer isn't psychic. Cut it short The buyer complained he was mislead by the seller from the scratched of the pda. The buyer post pictures and complain The seller come in and defend himself by telling he already posted picture(not seller fault) Everyone know it's irresponsible act based on the proof of the pm log ) The buyer request refund The seller is a high rank senior member, so he need to defend himself and clear his name. The seller defend himself again by saying before he sell the phone,the condition is not as bad.He accuse (I assume) that the buyer responsible for the scratched The seller summon witnesses into lyn which is on progress to clear his name although it contradicts which the seller/buyer post the pm message. Moderator taikor come in and say Seller irresponsbile which deem quite true where seller try to use Internet Selling strat to sell products. The seller trying to tell everyone he rated the phone based on his own judgement and not for the other sellers which dont justify everything( this can be ignored as we know rating on a quality doesnt count in internet sales) and the progress goes to 2nd stage which is NOT " phone scratched is different from what the seller promised" IT IS for now " I never made that scratched and im not responsible for that deep scratched" This post has been edited by Malaysian: Jul 30 2007, 12:27 AM |
|
|
Jul 30 2007, 12:28 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,688 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: inside toilet bowl |
refund and sell back to me cheap-cheap haha
im offer rm600 |
|
|
Jul 30 2007, 12:31 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
12,505 posts Joined: May 2007 From: Triumph in the Skies Status:In LoV3 Again |
QUOTE(Witchblade @ Jul 30 2007, 12:28 AM) Maybe you should have read the rules and regulation here.3. Do not post unless you have something useful to contribute. Ranting is not useful contribution. or refer back to goldfries post at here. Sigh. This post has been edited by KTCY: Jul 30 2007, 12:33 AM |
|
|
Jul 30 2007, 12:35 AM
|
|
VIP
9,778 posts Joined: Jun 2005 From: KL(Wangsa Maju) , Seremban 2 |
QUOTE(KTCY @ Jul 30 2007, 12:31 AM) Maybe you should have read the rules and regulation here. Same goes to you. if you don't have a clear proof to prove that I'm hiding the fact, please do not make your own assumption. , also please read back why i didn't mention much about the bad scratches earlier on, simply because I myself don't recall the phone is damaged till like that. Thus I decided to remain silent on the scratches and try to look back for those people who have seen it before i posted so further clarify it.3. Do not post unless you have something useful to contribute. Ranting is not useful contribution. or refer back to goldfries post at here. Sigh. QUOTE(KTCY @ Jul 30 2007, 12:18 AM) This post has been edited by vikingw2k: Jul 30 2007, 12:36 AM |
|
|
Jul 30 2007, 12:36 AM
|
|
Elite
5,154 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
Conclusion:
Seller: Notice the scratch but it wasn't as bad as on buyer's picture. "Indirectly", the seller suspects that the buyer has damaged the phone further. Buyer: Paid and receive the phone but realized the damage on the phone is worse than what claimed by the seller (95% new). The buyer asked about the scratch before purchasing but the seller failed to give a good explanation or pictures. Settlement: Buyer requests for refund. Seller disagrees. ========================================================================= So how to settle this? Has the personal warranty period over? |
|
|
Jul 30 2007, 12:38 AM
|
|
VIP
9,778 posts Joined: Jun 2005 From: KL(Wangsa Maju) , Seremban 2 |
QUOTE(kimhoong @ Jul 30 2007, 12:36 AM) Conclusion: Seller: Notice the scratch but it wasn't as bad as on buyer's picture. "Indirectly", the seller suspects that the buyer has damaged the phone further. Buyer: Paid and receive the phone but realized the damage on the phone is worse than what claimed by the seller (95% new). The buyer asked about the scratch before purchasing but the seller failed to give a good explanation or pictures. Settlement: Buyer requests for refund. Seller disagrees. ========================================================================= So how to settle this? Has the personal warranty period over? QUOTE 3. Item that's still under warranty are to be claimed by buyer themself from its respective distributor or retailer at their own cost. E.g Dallab, Mio , CMV , and other products. Contacts & address of respective distributor will be given upon request. Quoted from my T&C though this is irrelevant. Personal warranty doesn't cover the exterior. |
|
|
Jul 30 2007, 12:39 AM
|
|
Forum Admin
44,415 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
QUOTE(vikingw2k @ Jul 30 2007, 12:11 AM) I've already explained clearly, when i got it back, it was in very good condition. That's the reason i rated it as 95%. How many % i give is not that important. Afterall I've provide pictures and also offer COD so that the buyers can check it out themselves and commit if they wanted to. ok. my point was that if everyone is doing to have different estimation of scratches, then it's pointless rating it in the first place. p/s: You guys start to accuse as if I made the scratches. Don't you guys understand now, The point is, when i got it back, It wasn't like what in the picture, it's just some normal not so obvious normal wear and tear leading me rated it as 95%. QUOTE(vikingw2k @ Jul 30 2007, 12:11 AM) Which statement says "that i knew there was a dent?", please check out my beginning post until now, did i even admit that i saw a dent there? I was very shocked to see the seller's picture. That's why i didn't reply anything or start accusing blindly, and what i did was start questioning those people who saw that pdaphone before. If they said that it's really that bad when it was with me, then I would have admitted it. QUOTE(vikingw2k @ Jul 30 2007, 12:23 AM) I'm still trying to contact the few forummers to come here to proof that this pda phone is in good condition before i posted it via poslaju. That's my responsibility as a seller, which is to ensure my item is in good condition before sending out. Whatever happened after that is beyond my concern, unless there's any defect caused by me and i wouldn't wanna point fingers or simply accuse what caused the damage on the top of the pdaphone which suppose to be just minor normal wear and tear. fair enough. at least now we understand better from your POV. but regardless. when you sold it was not there, when he received it was there. so how are your witnesses going to help in this matter? the thing is you also didn't snap the condition before sending. or did you? EDITED : would it be possible if that portion was peeled or chipped while in transport? This post has been edited by goldfries: Jul 30 2007, 12:40 AM |
|
|
Jul 30 2007, 12:43 AM
|
|
VIP
9,778 posts Joined: Jun 2005 From: KL(Wangsa Maju) , Seremban 2 |
QUOTE(goldfries @ Jul 30 2007, 12:39 AM) ok. my point was that if everyone is doing to have different estimation of scratches, then it's pointless rating it in the first place. I've stated clearly, the reason I didn't say anything about the scratches is because I was suprised to see the condition of the item and I tried to contact those few person who have last seen it to make sure what i see is same with them.fair enough. at least now we understand better from your POV. p/s: Everybody would just put their own condition rate there, and nobody can say that it's right or wrong cause obviously it's the seller's personal point of view. Moreover, I've said, when i got it back, the scratches wasn't that bad that's the reason i rated it 95%. QUOTE but regardless. when you sold it was not there, when he received it was there. so how are your witnesses going to help in this matter? I've called another forummer to verify on that, he was the last guy who toyed around with the pdaphone right before i wrapped it and go to post office to deliver. (elvin87)the thing is you also didn't snap the condition before sending. or did you? EDITED : would it be possible if that portion was peeled or chipped while in transport? Which means, I have Previous Seller who pass the item to me who claim that it wasn't that bad when he passed to me (fullbl4d3) A forummer who came to my house to COD and saw that phone few days after i got it back (gtoforce) also another forummer who last seen the phone right before i wrapped it up and send it to post office(elvin87) This post has been edited by vikingw2k: Jul 30 2007, 12:45 AM |
|
|
Jul 30 2007, 12:46 AM
|
|
Forum Admin
44,415 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
QUOTE(vikingw2k @ Jul 30 2007, 12:43 AM) I've stated clearly, the reason I didn't say anything about the scratches is because I was suprised to see the condition of the item and I tried to contact those few person who have last seen it to make sure what i see is same with them. p/s: Everybody would just put their own condition rate there, and nobody can say that it's right or wrong cause obviously it's the seller's personal point of view. Moreover, I've said, when i got it back, the scratches wasn't that bad that's the reason i rated it 95%. alright. IMO next time better to say something la. if you know it wasn't there in the first place, then speak up. btw just to get a clearer picture about your side of the story, so there was not chip there in the first place or was it mildly chipped or what? how was the condition on that corner before you sent? QUOTE(vikingw2k @ Jul 30 2007, 12:43 AM) I've called another forummer to verify on that, he was the last guy who toyed around with the pdaphone right before i wrapped it and go to post office to deliver. (elvin87) ok. |
|
|
Jul 30 2007, 12:50 AM
|
|
VIP
9,778 posts Joined: Jun 2005 From: KL(Wangsa Maju) , Seremban 2 |
QUOTE(goldfries @ Jul 30 2007, 12:46 AM) alright. IMO next time better to say something la. if you know it wasn't there in the first place, then speak up. I'm sure that it wasn't like that, but it would be better if i can get people to back up my facts instead of just bla-ing there first and cover it up later. I just managed to contact (fullbl4de) just now, copied and pasted his conversation here. gtoforce and elvin87 yet to reply here QUOTE btw just to get a clearer picture about your side of the story, so there was not chip there in the first place or was it mildly chipped or what? It was just minor tear and wear on that part. if it's that serious, I would have noticed it earlier.how was the condition on that corner before you sent? This post has been edited by vikingw2k: Jul 30 2007, 12:50 AM |
|
|
Jul 30 2007, 12:51 AM
|
|
Moderator
2,083 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Penang |
If vikingw2k can get a few forumers to post here that infact they have seen and handle the phone and yes there was damage (wearing of the cover) but not serious damage (the said crack) then vikingw2k has a fairly good defence in saying, "my 95% is correct because that damage shown in those pics are post damage, not pre-damage." IE When he sent it, it was in the condition much better than that shown.
|
|
|
Jul 30 2007, 12:55 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
478 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Kuantan, PAHANG |
dude, i oso got witness when i open the box??? wats ur point??? now wan to blame poslaju right?? got so many variation of story..i can guess wat ur fren will say?? but i cannot guess ur PDA condition last time, remember?????
|
|
|
Jul 30 2007, 12:56 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,138 posts Joined: Dec 2006 |
QUOTE(goldfries @ Jul 30 2007, 12:46 AM) alright. IMO next time better to say something la. if you know it wasn't there in the first place, then speak up. totally agreed with that...... btw just to get a clearer picture about your side of the story, so there was not chip there in the first place or was it mildly chipped or what? how was the condition on that corner before you sent? QUOTE(vikingw2k @ Jul 30 2007, 12:43 AM) ......................................... and how do we know they are really telling the truth...??? Previous Seller who pass the item to me who claim that it wasn't that bad when he passed to me (fullbl4d3) A forummer who came to my house to COD and saw that phone few days after i got it back (gtoforce) also another forummer who last seen the phone right before i wrapped it up and send it to post office(elvin87) |
|
|
Jul 30 2007, 12:58 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
478 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Kuantan, PAHANG |
very very suspicious but rangered still didnt realize it, better read from the first post laa..
|
|
|
Jul 30 2007, 01:01 AM
|
|
VIP
9,778 posts Joined: Jun 2005 From: KL(Wangsa Maju) , Seremban 2 |
QUOTE(budakdegilz @ Jul 30 2007, 12:56 AM) totally agreed with that...... I've said earlier on, when he posted the pictures, instead of firing back I called and try to locate those few person who have seen that set beforeand how do we know they are really telling the truth...??? I asked them, how was the condition of the phone, and is there a big damage on the top. Of course i have to confirm with them before reporting back here. If all of them told me that they saw a big damage there, of course I would have just admitted that it was my fault. I just wanna make sure before i start to post here. Also i finally manage to contact the previous owner for his statement by 10 something. p/s: with this kinda mentality, do you think they would trust me if i denied it on the first day before i could post anything to back my statements? I believe they would start accusing me blindly saying that I'm trying to push around which is why i decided to remain calm, and further investigate before posting back on this thread. p/s: gtoforce's reply My sms to him - 8.14pm 30th July QUOTE Do u remember d Asus Pda which i showed u tatday,i still rmb u tellme d condition is likenew,did u notice any bad crack or dent on d phone tatday? Just asking=) His sms to me - 10.27pm 30th July QUOTE Nope, afair everything luks ok. d screen i x check la.haha. I've pm-ed him to reply here as well. I'll snap a screenshot of his sms and post here just in case This post has been edited by vikingw2k: Jul 30 2007, 01:09 AM |
|
|
Jul 30 2007, 01:08 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
478 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Kuantan, PAHANG |
so u use big damage phrase to get what answers you really need actually
no need to wait for that answers i already knows, juz tell me who you want to blame now???? ****edited*** This post has been edited by ad_rv4: Jul 30 2007, 03:51 AM |
|
|
Jul 30 2007, 01:10 AM
|
|
Forum Admin
44,415 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
ad_rv4, you filed a complaint here. i expect you to be reasonable in your replies as well.
from what i observed so far, vikingw2k has been professional in responding but apparently you're not. now i would that all of you talk like gentlemen instead of hooligans. |
|
|
Jul 30 2007, 01:11 AM
|
|
VIP
9,778 posts Joined: Jun 2005 From: KL(Wangsa Maju) , Seremban 2 |
QUOTE(ad_rv4 @ Jul 30 2007, 01:08 AM) so u use big damage phrase to get what answers you really need actually Please take note I've given them the link of your picture before they answer me. I'm not playing around with words to get the answer that i want.no need to wait for that answers i already knows, juz tell me who you want to blame now???? you are big liar man.. e.g. check the conversation log between me and fullbl4d3, i asked him to see the picture you posted before replying me. This post has been edited by vikingw2k: Jul 30 2007, 01:12 AM |
|
|
Jul 30 2007, 01:12 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,378 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Miri,Sarawak,Malaysia Status: Dead! |
Guys, cool down.
Let put it this way. Most of you saying it would be viking's fault if the item is already been dented before posting it out, in another way round, could be post courier or seller who made the damage on the phone. I know why blame the courier/seller, but its only a WHAT IF situation. viking can get witness to clarify the condition of the phone before sending it out. ad_rv4 can also get witness to prove the damage was there upon opening the package. So who to believe? Think for a moment before bashing around. As for now, try to settle nicely, instead of blaming one another without much proofs. Don't just flame me, I'm just voicing out my own opinion. I'm on neither side as well. |
|
|
Jul 30 2007, 01:13 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,499 posts Joined: Apr 2005 From: Tyneside |
I have met and chat with Viking2w personally..
He's a jolly good seller and is very responsible for the things that he sells.. Hope this matter clears up quickly |
|
|
Jul 30 2007, 01:13 AM
|
|
Forum Admin
44,415 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
ad_rv4, i would also like to request that you remove that statement from your signature.
firstly - you and viking didn't even discuss enough and you already opened this thread. secondly - viking is attempting to solve this matter with you, not fair for you to paint him unreliable when things aren't even conclusive please remove the siggy about this thread until there's sufficient proof, in the mean time there's no reason to say that he's unreliable seller. the fact that he's here and responding to you in respectable manner (and a manner better than you) shows he's doing his part as a trader. ( and yes vikingw2k, my apologies to you for any misunderstanding earlier. while i'm not siding you or anyone right now but i think you do deserve a chance to defend even though earlier posts make you look otherwise. |
|
|
Jul 30 2007, 01:13 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,138 posts Joined: Dec 2006 |
i think this will be a long time to settle lol~
|
|
|
Jul 30 2007, 01:14 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
478 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Kuantan, PAHANG |
professional in cheating right??? ****edited***i refer to when he ask me to refer to his clear pics right.. he should apologise me professionally, right????
and the second one, he pretend need to ask previous owner of the conditions although he seller shud know better since the ithem is in his hand??? got it???? This post has been edited by ad_rv4: Jul 30 2007, 03:52 AM |
|
|
Jul 30 2007, 01:18 AM
|
|
Forum Admin
44,415 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
QUOTE(ad_rv4 @ Jul 30 2007, 01:14 AM) professional in cheating right??? big liar i refer to when he ask me to refer to his clear pics right.. he should apologise me professionally, right???? awww c'mon you're being ridiculous here.and the second one, he pretend need to ask previous owner of the conditions although he seller shud know better since the ithem is in his hand??? got it???? accusations aren't going to help. even the picture that he snapped shows the bottom right crack that you highlighted. ok well, you have to zoom in to see it but hey he's not hiding. and i don't see how he should in anyway apologize to you yet as the case is not clear, however your lack of manners is something that you should consider about. and quit accusing people of pretending of this need to ask previous owner blablablablabla. you wouldn't want people to accuse you of purposely damaging goods to get discounts would you? then quit accusing others first - settle this matter as adults. |
|
|
Jul 30 2007, 01:18 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
478 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Kuantan, PAHANG |
and he didn't mention annything bout scracth or crack, WHY?????
|
|
|
Jul 30 2007, 01:18 AM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
68 posts Joined: Dec 2006 |
QUOTE(vikingw2k @ Jul 29 2007, 10:54 PM) Few days before i posted this phone to TS, I've COD-ed with a few forummers who came to my house, check my item for sale and some even online using my pc. They saw the phone and most of them told me that it's just like new. you can PM gtoforce about this. Also I've just chat with the previous owner who sold this phone to me. He admitted that he dropped the phone on the floor, I sent him the picture taken by you, he DENIED that it's that bad like the picture when he sold it to me. Also until the very last day, I've another forummer who came and toyed around with my phone right before I post it via poslaju to TS. He too was shocked after seeing the picture that you snapped. It wasn't that bad when I got it back from the previous seller (fullbl4de), the condition is just like new (gtoforce) who came to my house few days later to COD with me, and the very last day before i sent it out to you, (elvin87) toyed around with it and he too said that the condition is not like the picture you've shown. Also, a forummer (leeyuleong), came all the way from Cheras to my house to have a look on my set, he only remembered the most obvious thing is the tear and wear on the button after testing and considered about it. He didn't notice any bad cracks on the top. viking , the previous seller did say that he dropped the phone right? mind telling us how big is the damage previous that?Well, I don't wanna point my fingers to anybody. » Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... « |
|
|
Jul 30 2007, 01:19 AM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
159 posts Joined: Aug 2005 From: Kuantan |
QUOTE(ad_rv4 @ Jul 30 2007, 01:14 AM) professional in cheating right??? big liar i refer to when he ask me to refer to his clear pics right.. he should apologise me professionally, right???? ****edited*** hope can resolve better...and the second one, he pretend need to ask previous owner of the conditions although he seller shud know better since the ithem is in his hand??? got it???? This post has been edited by razzac: Jul 30 2007, 01:56 AM |
|
|
Jul 30 2007, 01:21 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
472 posts Joined: Dec 2004 From: Penang |
Unless there are pictures taken by viking that shows the phone was not damaged, there's no proof that the crack wasn't there when it was sent to the buyer. A couple of forumers suspiciously becomes his witness doesn't really clear things either. If Viking knew the phone wasn't damaged....why didn't he say anything when he was accused?
I'm not being biased or seeking revenge, just my opinion. |
|
|
Jul 30 2007, 01:22 AM
|
|
VIP
9,778 posts Joined: Jun 2005 From: KL(Wangsa Maju) , Seremban 2 |
QUOTE(dotn3t @ Jul 30 2007, 01:21 AM) Unless there are pictures taken by viking that shows the phone was not damaged, there's no proof that the crack wasn't there when it was sent to the buyer. A couple of forumers suspiciously becomes his witness doesn't really clear things either. If Viking knew the phone wasn't damaged....why didn't he say anything when he was accused? I guess you've missed this quoteI'm not being biased or seeking revenge, just my opinion. QUOTE(vikingw2k @ Jul 30 2007, 01:01 AM) I've said earlier on, when he posted the pictures, instead of firing back I called and try to locate those few person who have seen that set before I asked them, how was the condition of the phone, and is there a big damage on the top. Of course i have to confirm with them before reporting back here. If all of them told me that they saw a big damage there, of course I would have just admitted that it was my fault. I just wanna make sure before i start to post here. Also i finally manage to contact the previous owner for his statement by 10 something. p/s: with this kinda mentality, do you think they would trust me if i denied it on the first day before i could post anything to back my statements? I believe they would start accusing me blindly saying that I'm trying to push around which is why i decided to remain calm, and further investigate before posting back on this thread. p/s: gtoforce's reply My sms to him - 8.14pm 30th July His sms to me - 10.27pm 30th July I've pm-ed him to reply here as well. I'll snap a screenshot of his sms and post here just in case |
|
|
Jul 30 2007, 01:23 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
478 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Kuantan, PAHANG |
the truth is there, y u cant see it in the first place????
lastly, everyone will blame the poslaju service and tell me its already settle, no case , huh?? |
|
|
Jul 30 2007, 01:23 AM
|
|
Forum Admin
44,415 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
QUOTE(razzac @ Jul 30 2007, 01:19 AM) see. i told you many times your post are spamming and this is one of it.if i berat sebelah, why do you think i posted some stuff against Vikingw2k? http://forum.lowyat.net/topic/495152/+120 those who know me, know that i'm not berat sebelah. the fact that i'm over here overseeing people like you DOES indicate something that clearly makes me stand where i am. |
|
|
Jul 30 2007, 01:26 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,138 posts Joined: Dec 2006 |
QUOTE(budakdegilz @ Jul 30 2007, 01:13 AM) i think this will be a long time to settle lol~ TS ... may i know the answer?? This post has been edited by budakdegilz: Jul 30 2007, 01:27 AM |
|
|
Jul 30 2007, 01:26 AM
|
|
VIP
9,778 posts Joined: Jun 2005 From: KL(Wangsa Maju) , Seremban 2 |
QUOTE(goldfries @ Jul 30 2007, 01:23 AM) see. i told you many times your post are spamming and this is one of it. Just ignore him, he came in just to drop his 2 cents after being pwned by me for going against the Trade Zone R&R, obviously he and not-to-mention-a-few-others came in to frame me up with false claims and take this miserable opportunity to flame me.if i berat sebelah, why do you think i posted some stuff against Vikingw2k? http://forum.lowyat.net/topic/495152/+120 those who know me, know that i'm not berat sebelah. the fact that i'm over here overseeing people like you DOES indicate something that clearly makes me stand where i am. p/s: If you noticed, I didn't even waste my time replying those who i considered posting nonsense here. This post has been edited by vikingw2k: Jul 30 2007, 01:36 AM |
|
|
Jul 30 2007, 01:27 AM
|
|
Forum Admin
44,415 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
QUOTE(vikingw2k @ Jul 30 2007, 01:26 AM) Just ignore him, he came in just to drop his 2 cents after being pwned by me for going against the Trade Zone R&R, obviously he and not-to-mention-a-few-others start to frame me up and taking this miserable opportunity to flame me. ahh i saw. if you notice i've warned them creeps many times and they still come back. |
|
|
Jul 30 2007, 01:33 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
478 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Kuantan, PAHANG |
|
|
|
Jul 30 2007, 01:34 AM
|
|
VIP
9,778 posts Joined: Jun 2005 From: KL(Wangsa Maju) , Seremban 2 |
|
|
|
Jul 30 2007, 01:37 AM
|
![]()
Junior Member
13 posts Joined: Jan 2007 |
y dont both party settle with getting a new casing?
|
|
|
Jul 30 2007, 01:38 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
478 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Kuantan, PAHANG |
|
|
|
Jul 30 2007, 01:39 AM
|
|
Elite
5,154 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
So, goldfries (who I expect to the "judge" for this dispute) what's next after seller's eye-witnesses' statements?
Can you (or other trust-able mods/admins/staffs) show us the correct "proceeding" on this matter? This will become another never-ending debate if both parties are more concerned at "showing I am innocent and you are guilty" rather than reaching an agreement to solve this dispute This post has been edited by kimhoong: Jul 30 2007, 01:39 AM |
|
|
Jul 30 2007, 01:40 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
478 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Kuantan, PAHANG |
i wann to settle this down, refund me thats all, only seller scare if the PDA cannot sell at his expected price afterwards
|
|
|
Jul 30 2007, 01:42 AM
|
|
VIP
9,778 posts Joined: Jun 2005 From: KL(Wangsa Maju) , Seremban 2 |
QUOTE(kimhoong @ Jul 30 2007, 01:39 AM) So, goldfries (who I expect to the "judge" for this dispute) what's next after seller's eye-witnesses' statements? Can you (or other trust-able mods/admins/staffs) show us the correct "proceeding" on this matter? This will become another never-ending debate if both parties are more concerned at "showing I am innocent and you are guilty" rather than reaching an agreement to solve this dispute QUOTE 1. The moderators are not here to resolve your disputes, neither are they here to help you out. This subforum is for you to resolve your disputes in an organised and easy to follow manner. Basically, we don't have a judge here. TS created this thread to discuss peacefully with me. Nevertheless there are some monkeys who got nothing else better to do and come in to spam. |
|
|
Jul 30 2007, 01:46 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,070 posts Joined: Dec 2006 From: Damansara |
|
|
|
Jul 30 2007, 01:46 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,625 posts Joined: Dec 2005 |
QUOTE(vikingw2k @ Jul 30 2007, 01:42 AM) Basically, we don't have a judge here. TS created this thread to discuss peacefully with me. Nevertheless there are some monkeys who got nothing else better to do and come in to spam. Ok, so what do you think the best way to resolve this matter? Give out few solutions.TS @ ad_rv4, give out few solutions too. If anything that both of you can agree, then case should be solved peacefully, isn't it? |
|
|
Jul 30 2007, 01:48 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
478 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Kuantan, PAHANG |
QUOTE(vikingw2k @ Jul 30 2007, 01:42 AM) Basically, we don't have a judge here. TS created this thread to discuss peacefully with me. Nevertheless there are some monkeys who got nothing else better to do and come in to spam. and sincerely is most important, its not hard to said the truth if u r a good man..this person u call monkeys give some feedbacks of wat u do to them previously, is like u throw sh*t to people, of coz people will be mad at you.. |
|
|
Jul 30 2007, 01:50 AM
|
|
Forum Admin
44,415 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
QUOTE(kimhoong @ Jul 30 2007, 01:39 AM) So, goldfries (who I expect to the "judge" for this dispute) what's next after seller's eye-witnesses' statements? like what viking said, there's no judge here. Can you (or other trust-able mods/admins/staffs) show us the correct "proceeding" on this matter? This will become another never-ending debate if both parties are more concerned at "showing I am innocent and you are guilty" rather than reaching an agreement to solve this dispute in here i'm just like any of you here when i'm posting, of course my main role is to make sure things are carried out in orderly fashion. that's it. settlement is up to the parties involved to come to an agreeable term. |
|
|
Jul 30 2007, 01:51 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
478 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Kuantan, PAHANG |
QUOTE(ViRaViRa @ Jul 30 2007, 01:46 AM) Ok, so what do you think the best way to resolve this matter? Give out few solutions. ok, refund back my money, i cover the cost of courier and forget everything what seller had done..TS @ ad_rv4, give out few solutions too. If anything that both of you can agree, then case should be solved peacefully, isn't it? my apologies for everyone.. |
|
|
Jul 30 2007, 01:53 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,625 posts Joined: Dec 2005 |
|
|
|
Jul 30 2007, 01:53 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
698 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
vikingw2k and goldfries are my fren i dont know why people make a big fuss here. just do a win win solution.
1.As seller we try our best to provide all the details as much as posiable and we do not cover damage done within the postal, especially pos laju how we know how they handle it? 2.As buyer should had ask for more info before purchase and if u suspect something amiss then dont close the deals or ask for COD. 3.Goods sold,none refundable even at shops.I personally deals with vikingw2k before he a honest seller so dont add more flame on him. So solutions are buyer sent back the items to seller and seller see what can do on the item, replace with new case or give discounted price, as i see here are only the exterior problem should be fine if vikingw2k can refund some money to the seller and close the case. BTW we are not lawyer here, and we dont try behave like one,digging what people write and try to exploits it is bad coz every word means diff to individual. Sorry if i offend some people here or i seem help the seller, but i just give my 2cent point of view only |
|
|
Jul 30 2007, 01:54 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
745 posts Joined: Dec 2004 |
|
|
|
Jul 30 2007, 01:58 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
478 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Kuantan, PAHANG |
QUOTE(umikosan @ Jul 30 2007, 01:53 AM) vikingw2k and goldfries are my fren i dont know why people make a big fuss here. just do a win win solution. better u read from the page first, your point of views is only for ur good frens..1.As seller we try our best to provide all the details as much as posiable and we do not cover damage done within the postal, especially pos laju how we know how they handle it? 2.As buyer should had ask for more info before purchase and if u suspect something amiss then dont close the deals or ask for COD. 3.Goods sold,none refundable even at shops.I personally deals with vikingw2k before he a honest seller so dont add more flame on him. So solutions are buyer sent back the items to seller and seller see what can do on the item, replace with new case or give discounted price, as i see here are only the exterior problem should be fine if vikingw2k can refund some money to the seller and close the case. BTW we are not lawyer here, and we dont try behave like one,digging what people write and try to exploits it is bad coz every word means diff to individual. Sorry if i offend some people here or i seem help the seller, but i just give my 2cent point of view only |
|
|
Jul 30 2007, 02:03 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
698 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
|
|
|
Jul 30 2007, 02:09 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
5,417 posts Joined: May 2006 From: Bear Hill, Malacca |
QUOTE(umikosan @ Jul 30 2007, 01:53 AM) vikingw2k and goldfries are my fren i dont know why people make a big fuss here. just do a win win solution. brother... read before hand 1st... ts did ask viking about the scratches before buying....1.As seller we try our best to provide all the details as much as posiable and we do not cover damage done within the postal, especially pos laju how we know how they handle it? 2.As buyer should had ask for more info before purchase and if u suspect something amiss then dont close the deals or ask for COD. 3.Goods sold,none refundable even at shops.I personally deals with vikingw2k before he a honest seller so dont add more flame on him. So solutions are buyer sent back the items to seller and seller see what can do on the item, replace with new case or give discounted price, as i see here are only the exterior problem should be fine if vikingw2k can refund some money to the seller and close the case. BTW we are not lawyer here, and we dont try behave like one,digging what people write and try to exploits it is bad coz every word means diff to individual. Sorry if i offend some people here or i seem help the seller, but i just give my 2cent point of view only |
|
|
Jul 30 2007, 02:09 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,651 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
adrv4,at first you have a point but now you dont.And the point goes back to viking which is the seller.You dont need to post and flame unncessary stuff.What you need to do is to stick back on the problem solving issue
you come here to settle problems so you need to settle it professionally. viking wont be mad at malaysian,rite?Coz inside here is like a lokap.Guilty until proven innocent. coz since the beginning i take you as the accuse and adrv4 as the accuser.Until u come out with your facts. The problem now is You want a refund coz of the scratched. And this WHAT IF issue comes in this problem. What if it's indeed the courier fault and viking has to clear his name at first place?Of course he need to summon witnesses into here to clear his name.And as a buyer you still need to follow the seller's TOC. So what you need to do is just wait for seller to decide. What u actually doin right now ,what u replied....u will make urself turn into an accuse.So reply like an adult.At first i really buy your facts.But now i dont.See my point here? QUOTE Goldfries said: see. i told you many times your post are spamming and this is one of it. if i berat sebelah, why do you think i posted some stuff against Vikingw2k? http://forum.lowyat.net/topic/495152/+120 those who know me, know that i'm not berat sebelah. the fact that i'm over here overseeing people like you DOES indicate something that clearly makes me stand where i am. he taikor and not berat sebelah wan lar..He ban me b4 coz of my wrongdoin in lyn.He damn strict wan.If he hover in kopitiam,means someone sure will get ban coz breaking lyn rules. This post has been edited by Malaysian: Jul 30 2007, 02:27 AM |
|
|
Jul 30 2007, 02:24 AM
|
|
Forum Admin
44,415 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
QUOTE(Malaysian @ Jul 30 2007, 02:09 AM) he taikor and not berat sebelah wan lar..He ban me b4 coz of my wrongdoin in lyn.He damn strict wan.If he hover in kopitiam,means someone sure will get ban coz breaking lyn rules. LOL. eh i no power to ban la. |
|
|
Jul 30 2007, 02:30 AM
|
|
VIP
9,778 posts Joined: Jun 2005 From: KL(Wangsa Maju) , Seremban 2 |
QUOTE(Malaysian @ Jul 30 2007, 02:09 AM) he taikor and not berat sebelah wan lar..He ban me b4 coz of my wrongdoin in lyn.He damn strict wan.If he hover in kopitiam,means someone sure will get ban coz breaking lyn rules. At least you are much better than those miserable dudes who came in just for the sake of spamming and flaming making themselves look silly and immature. |
|
|
Jul 30 2007, 02:37 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
478 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Kuantan, PAHANG |
lets look at the chronology..
1. i ask him about the 5%scratch and buyer said refer to the clear pics.. 2. the part that damage cannot be seen in the pictures 3. buyer admit the phone inside a leather pouch for extra protection so its not poslaju faulty 4. He ask the previous owner the condition although buyer should know it better..WHY??? 5. YES, previous owner admit the PDA had dropped before 6. buyer got witness before the PDA being post.. 7 i got my witnesses when i received and open the box, and YES, the item is what u see in the pictures post by me, (all my 3 frens, all teachers same like me sees it)- no point i want to do something silly.. 8. can u guess which part of the story clash now???? |
|
|
Jul 30 2007, 02:42 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,651 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
QUOTE(ad_rv4 @ Jul 30 2007, 02:37 AM) lets look at the chronology.. like this mah.This is the right way to reply.Tough issue.I leave u and viking to settle it for now. It's not me to judge and reply anymore. 1. i ask him about the 5%scratch and buyer said refer to the clear pics.. 2. the part that damage cannot be seen in the pictures 3. buyer admit the phone inside a leather pouch for extra protection so its not poslaju faulty 4. He ask the previous owner the condition although buyer should know it better..WHY??? 5. YES, previous owner admit the PDA had dropped before 6. buyer got witness before the PDA being post.. 7 i got my witnesses when i received and open the box, and YES, the item is what u see in the pictures post by me, (all my 3 frens, all teachers same like me sees it)- no point i want to do something silly.. 8. can u guess which part of the story clash now???? I suggest other dun need to reply also.Coz it's not pancing undi inside here. |
|
|
Jul 30 2007, 02:42 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
511 posts Joined: Feb 2006 From: Pearl Island not Black Pearl |
|
|
|
Jul 30 2007, 02:48 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
323 posts Joined: Jun 2006 From: You spelt "Harbl" wrongly and it wasn't a typo |
Pic on the left side was on seller's thread. Received/buyer's pic on the right. It shows the damage was exactly the same before and after it was sold but you couldn't actually see the damage from the pics due to distance and camera angle. The damages on the other sides wasn't shown.
![]() This post has been edited by jcheong: Jul 30 2007, 02:50 AM |
|
|
Jul 30 2007, 02:56 AM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
152 posts Joined: Jun 2007 From: Perak |
did the seller ever mentioned of the scratched top? NO.. means a dishonourable act as a seller (somemore a trade enforcer.. whats this title for? enforcing WTS & WTB tag only?)..
TS wants a refund bcos he felt being cheated here.. somemore the pda has been dropped b4 (which hasn't been mentioned in the sales thread) and got bad scratches & cuts, so its not 95% NEW.. not even 90% NEW.. but the seller rated it as 95% NEW (is this really words from a pro??).. Everybody will get angry when receive a 95% NEW item which actually <90%.. come on seller, ur buyer paid u using his hard-earned money.. u shouldnt just care about making profit.. u have reputation to uphold.. seller's T&C means quite a bad after sales service.. not even personal warranty.. this won't come from a reliable seller.. for the time being, i suggest seller should do a refund.. since buyer received the item which doesnt look like what has been shown in seller's sale thread.. remember, a responsible and reliable seller will quote and show his items problem/defects b4 selling.. making sure his buyer know & understand fully of items condition.. so then are u a responsible/reliable seller? This post has been edited by wandzul: Jul 30 2007, 02:57 AM |
|
|
Jul 30 2007, 02:56 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,651 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
looks like the situation change 360 for now
see this picture say 1000 words this is seller pictures 2 replies above is the buyer picture This post has been edited by Malaysian: Jul 30 2007, 02:57 AM Attached image(s) |
|
|
Jul 30 2007, 02:58 AM
|
|
Forum Admin
44,415 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
QUOTE(Malaysian @ Jul 30 2007, 02:56 AM) looks like the situation change 360 for now 360 would mean back to ........... ? Added on July 30, 2007, 2:59 am QUOTE(wandzul @ Jul 30 2007, 02:56 AM) » Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... « right now both side have their story and really it's not something so clear cut already. This post has been edited by goldfries: Jul 30 2007, 02:59 AM |
|
|
Jul 30 2007, 03:00 AM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
152 posts Joined: Jun 2007 From: Perak |
the bottom part.. no comment.. but the top part? got covered by thumb sumore.. unintentionally will u say?? (even u oredi knew the scratch is there in the first place?)..
This post has been edited by wandzul: Jul 30 2007, 03:07 AM |
|
|
Jul 30 2007, 03:00 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,651 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
|
|
|
Jul 30 2007, 03:01 AM
|
|
Forum Admin
44,415 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
LOL. you don't get it. if the situation had a total change, it's 180 change. not 360. 360 would mean it goes back to where it started.
|
|
|
Jul 30 2007, 03:05 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,651 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
QUOTE(goldfries @ Jul 30 2007, 03:01 AM) LOL. you don't get it. if the situation had a total change, it's 180 change. not 360. 360 would mean it goes back to where it started. why u spam can..i dun wan reply u actually..u trying to provoke me to spam..later u ban me..how?my fault lar it's 180 degree ok.... need viking to reply bout the pda picture for now....wont reply even ppl provoke me |
|
|
Jul 30 2007, 03:07 AM
|
|
Forum Admin
44,415 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
aiyoh the things you type, if i don't respond others will also la.
oh btw you forget very fast - i said I HAVE NO POWER TO BAN. *phew* |
|
|
Jul 30 2007, 03:08 AM
|
|
VIP
2,450 posts Joined: Sep 2005 |
--edited--
case nullified... i made some mistake pointed to post 73 This post has been edited by stevanistelrooy: Jul 30 2007, 03:18 AM |
|
|
Jul 30 2007, 03:17 AM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
152 posts Joined: Jun 2007 From: Perak |
QUOTE(goldfries @ Jul 30 2007, 02:58 AM) wandzul. do read the rest before concluding. if it was so easily concluded it would've been done so earlier on. it started very simple --> TS asked seller which part is scratched and the seller asked TS to view the photos.. did the photos show the scratched top? No, right? moreover, previous owner also confirmed to seller about the scratched top.. its just that the seller claimed that its not as that bad b4 shipping.. but the scratch is there in the first place and seller didnt even mentioned about nor show it in his sale thread..right now both side have their story and really it's not something so clear cut already. does a reliable, responsible yet professional seller will rate a physical damaged item (scratches & CUTS) as 95% NEW?? somemore its oredi 2nd hand item when seller owned it.. is this professional? dont do stuffs like that la.. u're just gonna bring down the 'trade enforcer' title's reputation.. This post has been edited by wandzul: Jul 30 2007, 03:18 AM |
|
|
Jul 30 2007, 03:17 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,651 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
this is a case issue to solve and we need proof and witnesses.So far the picture is quite enough,i say it again QUITE enough to justify half of this issue. All of us know the answer and we in fact have the answer but we need time to post the answer out and give the solution. This post has been edited by Malaysian: Jul 30 2007, 03:27 AM |
|
|
Jul 30 2007, 03:19 AM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
152 posts Joined: Jun 2007 From: Perak |
so much solutions already given.. but still none taken..
|
|
|
Jul 30 2007, 03:22 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,651 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
seller offline and buyer online.
So nothing much can do in here.Have to wait for 2nd round tmrow morning or afternoon.I hope this topic wont get ban and be invisble..I want to know the outcome. |
|
|
Jul 30 2007, 03:26 AM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
152 posts Joined: Jun 2007 From: Perak |
it wont get banned or invisibled if the LYN admin(s) carry their/his duty honestly.. everyone needs to know about this, who's actually guilty, irregardless of who he is..
|
|
|
Jul 30 2007, 03:31 AM
|
|
Forum Admin
44,415 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
instead of pin-pointing who's guilty, i prefer to see both parties acknowledge there's a problem and how to go about solving it.
there's so many possibilities, one of which is that it chipped off just before packaging. and it's just a piece of the cosmetic. ad_rv4 has proposed a full refund with himself covering the courier cost - which is a reasonable proposition (IMO better than wasting time arguing away who's wrong. this move will settle all, no one will be wrong already) other possible solutions are for seller to send to casing or skin (if possible). or just pay for the skin / casing replacement. or just refund a bit (like discount) for the cosmetic issue. there's many ways to settle. |
|
|
Jul 30 2007, 03:48 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
318 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Puchong |
--Zip--
This post has been edited by ssaturn: Jul 30 2007, 04:01 AM |
|
|
Jul 30 2007, 08:42 AM
|
|
VIP
9,778 posts Joined: Jun 2005 From: KL(Wangsa Maju) , Seremban 2 |
QUOTE(goldfries @ Jul 30 2007, 03:31 AM) ad_rv4 has proposed a full refund with himself covering the courier cost - which is a reasonable proposition (IMO better than wasting time arguing away who's wrong. this move will settle all, no one will be wrong already) That'll only benefits the TS. How about the seller? I doubt that and I don't see a reason why everybody is like putting the blame on the seller when a seller's responsibility just to ensure the item being packed nicely and in good condition before sending it out to buyer. How about you guys try putting yourself in the seller's shoe. If you guys suddenly receive a complaint saying that your item is not up to someone's standard and he's asking for full refund, what will ya do? Just admit that you are wrong, admit that you yourself mislead him, and bank in blindly to the buyer? If you say yes to all these, I'll make you my favorite seller so that i can buy some stuff from you, test for few days, complain that your item is not to my own personal standard and demand for a full refund.QUOTE(ad_rv4 @ Jul 30 2007, 01:51 AM) ok, refund back my money, i cover the cost of courier and forget everything what seller had done.. Hey come on, what do you mean by that? What have i done? Did I give out false information misleading you to this deal? Do not simply accuse me will ya. Try buying an item from the net and few days later complaint to the seller that his item is not up to your own personal standard, i bet the seller won't even bother about you.my apologies for everyone.. wandzul - If you don't even bother spending some time going through all the previous post, understand everything clearly and posting like an adult, I would suggest you to stay out from this thread rather than posting something which we've discussed before. We are in the middle of solving this issue and I would appreciate it if you have something constructive to contribute instead of posting anti-Trade-Enforcer kinda nonsense blatantly. This post has been edited by vikingw2k: Jul 30 2007, 08:51 AM |
|
|
Jul 30 2007, 08:45 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
478 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Kuantan, PAHANG |
lets look at the chronology..
1. i ask him about the 5%scratch and buyer said refer to the clear pics.. 2. the part that damage cannot be seen in the pictures 3. buyer admit the phone inside a leather pouch for extra protection so its not poslaju faulty 4. He ask the previous owner the condition although buyer should know it better..WHY??? 5. YES, previous owner admit the PDA had dropped before 6. buyer got witness before the PDA being post.. 7 i got my witnesses when i received and open the box, and YES, the item is what u see in the pictures post by me, (all my 3 frens, all teachers same like me sees it)- no point i want to do something silly.. 8. can u guess which part of the story clash now???? |
|
|
Jul 30 2007, 09:07 AM
|
|
VIP
9,778 posts Joined: Jun 2005 From: KL(Wangsa Maju) , Seremban 2 |
QUOTE(ad_rv4 @ Jul 30 2007, 08:45 AM) Chronicles of Narnia bla bla... Isn't that the same thing which you've posted here, I hardly get what you are trying to tell here.8. can u guess which part of the story clash now???? QUOTE 7 i got my witnesses when i received and open the box, and YES, the item is what u see in the pictures post by me, (all my 3 frens, all teachers same like me sees it)- no point i want to do something silly.. I've came across cheapskate buyers who tried to claim for full refund using the same tactic. I too found that he did so because he got a better offer elsewhere after he committed to my deal, but because he already paid deposit for my item, he's bound to my deal and he start to think of better "legal" ways to put the blame on me. Well, like i said, I'm not into pointing fingers unless I have a reliable fact to back my statement Also why did you think I would do the damage for? I should be happy to have a good and easy buyer(from beginning only) who came by my thread, negotiate reasonably, and bank in full amount to me. I even tried my very best to post it on that day itself for you so that you can receive it asap. |
|
|
Jul 30 2007, 09:09 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
478 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Kuantan, PAHANG |
lets look at the chronology..
1. i ask him about the 5%scratch and buyer said refer to the clear pics.. 2. the part that damage cannot be seen in the pictures 3. buyer admit the phone inside a leather pouch for extra protection so its not poslaju faulty 4. He ask the previous owner the condition although buyer should know it better..WHY??? 5. YES, previous owner admit the PDA had dropped before 6. buyer got witness before the PDA being post.. 7 i got my witnesses when i received and open the box, and YES, the item is what u see in the pictures post by me, (all my 3 frens, all teachers same like me sees it)- no point i want to do something silly.. 8. can u guess which part of the story clash now???? |
|
|
Jul 30 2007, 09:16 AM
|
|
Admin
1,806 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Captain's Cabin, Black Pearl |
viking, the same 3 days rule applies to you. If there is no amicable settlement between you and your buyer in this case, we will have no choice but to assign you the dispute resolution tag for failing to come to an amicable settlement in a trade zone dispute.
|
|
|
Jul 30 2007, 09:23 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,281 posts Joined: Oct 2006 From: Littleroot Town |
hay,
seriously my friend viking, you need to take a good care of your tag. i looked at your tag, COD with you last time (2 times for 2 moto L7i). i dont even bother to check the items carefully because of your tag. to TS, i would keep the pda, change the casing (if possible), and use it to the fullest. and if got problem, maybe viking could help for the servicing purpose or whatnot. no need to refund, i suggest viking to cover the servicing, maybe up to one month? i found that the TS already stated his solution, and viking disagrees. now viking what's yr proposed solution? aint see any. TS want full refund, and viking you maybe can bargain it, say instead of refund, you cover the servicing (if got hardware failure and such) for a month. what say you? |
|
|
Jul 30 2007, 10:54 AM
|
![]()
Junior Member
32 posts Joined: Apr 2006 From: Malaysia |
this problem is soo obvious and y the seller still not able to refund ? i just don't understand Y ?
only one thing has to be considered, --the scratches on the pda was not highlighted at all to the seller and it is not the buyer's job to ask for more specific images of the pda. THIS IS OBVIOUS.... |
|
|
Jul 30 2007, 11:34 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,378 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Miri,Sarawak,Malaysia Status: Dead! |
Well you have to think the other way around WHAT IF the damaged is really not done by viking and to settle the ways you all suggested, viking will have to resposible for something that's not at his fault. That isn't fair as well.
Better solution is, both parties shares the 50/50 for a new case, cause as until now, we still don't know who made the damage without concrete proof. |
|
|
Jul 30 2007, 12:01 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,008 posts Joined: Sep 2005 From: T.T.D.I, Bukit Damansara |
What about those pics? The ones posted by jcheong and the other dude.
|
|
|
Jul 30 2007, 12:17 PM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
176 posts Joined: Jun 2005 |
hey...i think this case are gone so far...offline at 6 page, online back oledi 11 page~
the point here is about the crack at the top of the phone... viking said there is witnesses and so do the buyer. i dont think it is becos of postage because if it bcause of it, there should be a housing piece that crack rite? still waiting for the witnesses i think...? hurm by the way viking, when u speak up that the crack was not there...its not pointing and blaming to others...but likes goldfries said...SPEAK UP~! DEFEND URSELf~! and show that u r innocent |
|
|
Jul 30 2007, 12:21 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
8,913 posts Joined: Mar 2005 |
QUOTE(LEVIATHAN @ Jul 30 2007, 09:23 AM) hay, Still got warranty, no need to ma huan, can straight direct deal with Asus marseriously my friend viking, you need to take a good care of your tag. i looked at your tag, COD with you last time (2 times for 2 moto L7i). i dont even bother to check the items carefully because of your tag. to TS, i would keep the pda, change the casing (if possible), and use it to the fullest. and if got problem, maybe viking could help for the servicing purpose or whatnot. no need to refund, i suggest viking to cover the servicing, maybe up to one month? i found that the TS already stated his solution, and viking disagrees. now viking what's yr proposed solution? aint see any. TS want full refund, and viking you maybe can bargain it, say instead of refund, you cover the servicing (if got hardware failure and such) for a month. what say you? |
|
|
Jul 30 2007, 12:34 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,625 posts Joined: Dec 2005 |
QUOTE(Joshua_0718 @ Jul 30 2007, 12:21 PM) Yup, agree. Servicing & etc is not an issue as the PDA is still under warranty. The concern now is the casing as ASUS will not be liable for the crack@hole as it's due to user(s) negligence.BTW, if the housing is replaced on your own or not via ASUS service centre, can that VOID the warranty? Coz some gadgets are such where the warranty sticker have to be tampered to change the housing... |
|
|
Jul 30 2007, 12:40 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
8,913 posts Joined: Mar 2005 |
QUOTE(ViRaViRa @ Jul 30 2007, 12:34 PM) Yup, agree. Servicing & etc is not an issue as the PDA is still under warranty. The concern now is the casing as ASUS will not be liable for the crack@hole as it's due to user(s) negligence. Just change to a original housing. Changing a housing won't void warrantyBTW, if the housing is replaced on your own or not via ASUS service centre, can that VOID the warranty? Coz some gadgets are such where the warranty sticker have to be tampered to change the housing... |
|
|
Jul 30 2007, 12:48 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,287 posts Joined: Jun 2007 From: Anno Domini Time Ultra: 1,000,000 Trans Am Attack! |
IMO, this is online deal, be expected what you can't expect. As usual, buy at your own risk.
They might some consequences using Pos Laju as courier. Whereby many of you do not know that the staff that sending your package did open the package "sometimes" to inspect. This is what i experienced from them. 2 Pendrive sent and buyer received 1 instead of 2. Got it? I don't have the proof as I'm not dealing LYN. I'm no supporting Viking, but what you guys want is a win-win situation. If TS want a full refund, this will become unfair to viking as well. Well business is not done that way, Viking did provide you with the warranty card as well whereby most of the dealers in LYN did not provide as most of them are warranty voided or ended. Just to remind you TS, you can claim from Asus for an service and repair for free of charge. You do not need to make a fuss here. Regards, |
|
|
Jul 30 2007, 12:53 PM
|
|
Forum Admin
44,415 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
QUOTE(vikingw2k @ Jul 30 2007, 08:42 AM) That'll only benefits the TS. How about the seller? I doubt that and I don't see a reason why everybody is like putting the blame on the seller when a seller's responsibility just to ensure the item being packed nicely and in good condition before sending it out to buyer. How about you guys try putting yourself in the seller's shoe. If you guys suddenly receive a complaint saying that your item is not up to someone's standard and he's asking for full refund, what will ya do? Just admit that you are wrong, admit that you yourself mislead him, and bank in blindly to the buyer? If you say yes to all these, I'll make you my favorite seller so that i can buy some stuff from you, test for few days, complain that your item is not to my own personal standard and demand for a full refund. TS has offered a reasonable way to settle this matter. do come up with a solution that's satisfying to your side. btw it doesn't benefit the TS either. he'll have to pack it and send it back to you, have to use time and money to get the goods back to you also. both of you have some form of loss from this deal. ok how about like this both contribute to the cost of a new housing for the PDA. 50/50, or whatever ratio you guys think feasible. |
|
|
Jul 30 2007, 12:54 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,625 posts Joined: Dec 2005 |
QUOTE(temptation1314 @ Jul 30 2007, 12:48 PM) IMO, this is online deal, be expected what you can't expect. As usual, buy at your own risk. Huh? I think you just jumped from the sky & came here. They will not change the casing for free as it's not their problem.They might some consequences using Pos Laju as courier. Whereby many of you do not know that the staff that sending your package did open the package "sometimes" to inspect. This is what i experienced from them. 2 Pendrive sent and buyer received 1 instead of 2. Got it? I don't have the proof as I'm not dealing LYN. I'm no supporting Viking, but what you guys want is a win-win situation. If TS want a full refund, this will become unfair to viking as well. Well business is not done that way, Viking did provide you with the warranty card as well whereby most of the dealers in LYN did not provide as most of them are warranty voided or ended. Just to remind you TS, you can claim from Asus for an service and repair for free of charge. You do not need to make a fuss here. Regards, |
|
|
Jul 30 2007, 12:59 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,287 posts Joined: Jun 2007 From: Anno Domini Time Ultra: 1,000,000 Trans Am Attack! |
QUOTE(ViRaViRa @ Jul 30 2007, 12:54 PM) Huh? I think you just jumped from the sky & came here. They will not change the casing for free as it's not their problem. Oppss.... wrongly define. Of course, sorry ViRaViRa Btw, as goldfries suggest, it'll be fair to fork out money to change a new casing. AFAIK, changing casing wont void the warranty. @viking, either you can fork out money to buy a new housing or you might can discuss with TS to forkout 50/50. |
|
|
Jul 30 2007, 02:28 PM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
250 posts Joined: Jan 2006 |
QUOTE(Hyde`fK @ Jul 30 2007, 11:34 AM) Well you have to think the other way around WHAT IF the damaged is really not done by viking and to settle the ways you all suggested, viking will have to resposible for something that's not at his fault. That isn't fair as well. Well, No one here Even Knows Who did the holes, what exactly happened and why The phone is already damaged. even a seller who is Viking doesnt know about this as well ACCORDING TO HIS STATEMENTS, But I guess, From the holes I've seen, It's very impossible that It's damaged by the Poslaju..( point of my view ) , some more Viking said that before he sent the phone, he protected the phone under the plastic cover or watsoever I forgot what he said, So to make something holes like that, Of course and For sure either the box or the wrapping plastic would be damaged as well.Better solution is, both parties shares the 50/50 for a new case, cause as until now, we still don't know who made the damage without concrete proof. ok, that is just my opinion though, no hard feelings ok guys or anyone else.... for the solution, 1. Viking refunds the money to ts 2. If viking feels it's totally unfair, then both parties should discuss nicely to come up with another best solution, which probably viking only wants to cover the fees of replacing the broken case to the new case. 3. Peace. sorry yah all, If u guys think Iam too getting into the matter seriously without something useful Gud luck to both parties, Hopefully u two can settle the matter nicely and get back to work and have other businesses in forum. This post has been edited by anggajaya: Jul 30 2007, 02:29 PM |
|
|
Jul 30 2007, 03:04 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,651 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
It's not about who make the top hole or scratches anymore.
The real problem now is The buyer proposed a solution which is refund and buyer bare the courier fees. And the seller ask us to be in his shoe and make a point that he is not the one that cause the top hole scracthes. So the judgement will be back to the quality as claimed as The seller and his high quality pictures in this thread http://forum.lowyat.net/index.php?showtopic=492350&hl= but ignoring the rating 95% claimed by the seller nice condition quality of the pda.Because no one can rate by % for the quality of a product. So we judge from the seller and the buyer pictures posted inside here. We know the answer.It's very obvious about the quality right from the start. We disregard the top hole/scratches because both the seller and the buyer denying who caused it. So we judge the other part of the pda's quality. This is the buyer's picture after he get the pda but ignore the top part hole quality. http://img526.imageshack.us/img526/5442/28072007041kz6.jpg http://img340.imageshack.us/img340/4884/28072007039zq4.jpg http://img526.imageshack.us/img526/1908/28072007031ee5.jpg http://img340.imageshack.us/img340/8131/28072007022os8.jpg http://img526.imageshack.us/img526/1686/28072007025uw7.jpg below is the true real picture from both side the seller and the buyer ![]() ![]() ![]() From the picture,the conclusion is The seller's picture is perfect 95% condition but not perfect after using gamma to brighten the pictures. The seller picture is in here http://forum.lowyat.net/index.php?showtopic=492350&hl= So the seller picture is match with the buyer picture which also means the quality of the pda is the same right from the start from the seller hand till the buyer hand but ignoring the top hole part (because both of them denying who caused it) So we need a solution on it.Right now the buyer proposed the solution which is refund and he will be paying for the courier fees and the seller rejected claiming he is not held responsible for the overall scratches or the top part hole. This post has been edited by Malaysian: Jul 30 2007, 03:26 PM |
|
|
Jul 30 2007, 04:05 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,138 posts Joined: Dec 2006 |
wow~..!! we have a picture expert now!!!
|
|
|
Jul 30 2007, 04:12 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,236 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: BB Bangi |
QUOTE(Malaysian @ Jul 30 2007, 03:04 PM) It's not about who make the top hole or scratches anymore. referring to this pic from buyerThe real problem now is The buyer proposed a solution which is refund and buyer bare the courier fees. And the seller ask us to be in his shoe and make a point that he is not the one that cause the top hole scracthes. So the judgement will be back to the quality as claimed as The seller and his high quality pictures in this thread http://forum.lowyat.net/index.php?showtopic=492350&hl= but ignoring the rating 95% claimed by the seller nice condition quality of the pda.Because no one can rate by % for the quality of a product. So we judge from the seller and the buyer pictures posted inside here. We know the answer.It's very obvious about the quality right from the start. We disregard the top hole/scratches because both the seller and the buyer denying who caused it. So we judge the other part of the pda's quality. This is the buyer's picture after he get the pda but ignore the top part hole quality. http://img526.imageshack.us/img526/5442/28072007041kz6.jpg http://img340.imageshack.us/img340/4884/28072007039zq4.jpg http://img526.imageshack.us/img526/1908/28072007031ee5.jpg http://img340.imageshack.us/img340/8131/28072007022os8.jpg http://img526.imageshack.us/img526/1686/28072007025uw7.jpg below is the true real picture from both side the seller and the buyer » Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... « » Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... « » Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... « From the picture,the conclusion is The seller's picture is perfect 95% condition but not perfect after using gamma to brighten the pictures. The seller picture is in here http://forum.lowyat.net/index.php?showtopic=492350&hl= So the seller picture is match with the buyer picture which also means the quality of the pda is the same right from the start from the seller hand till the buyer hand but ignoring the top hole part (because both of them denying who caused it) So we need a solution on it.Right now the buyer proposed the solution which is refund and he will be paying for the courier fees and the seller rejected claiming he is not held responsible for the overall scratches or the top part hole. » Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... « i don't see any problem with the bottom part that u highlighted.. that could just simply be an underexposed part.. dun over-react with your "findings".. it seems more like photo quality rather than the actual phone condition.. edited as per viking's request.. sorry for any inconvenience caused.. This post has been edited by kevin613: Jul 30 2007, 04:52 PM |
|
|
Jul 30 2007, 04:28 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
7,106 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
Haven't been reading all 12 pages but I do think both sides do bear responsibility in this.
But wanting a full refund a slightly unfair to the seller, especially when he has stated that it was 95% condition, while slightly misleading, he has not totally covered up the fact that it was not in perfect condition. And the buyer bears the responsibility of buying something this precious to him online and without looking at it, also for not asking the exact reason why the seller mention is 95% condition. Since the damaged cover is the source of dispute, can't both parties fork out half to exchange it? At least it'll sort this out? |
|
|
Jul 30 2007, 04:35 PM
|
|
VIP
9,778 posts Joined: Jun 2005 From: KL(Wangsa Maju) , Seremban 2 |
QUOTE(se7en @ Jul 30 2007, 09:16 AM) viking, the same 3 days rule applies to you. If there is no amicable settlement between you and your buyer in this case, we will have no choice but to assign you the dispute resolution tag for failing to come to an amicable settlement in a trade zone dispute. Noted, I'm aware of that. Thanks for reminding.QUOTE(goldfries @ Jul 30 2007, 12:53 PM) TS has offered a reasonable way to settle this matter. do come up with a solution that's satisfying to your side. btw it doesn't benefit the TS either. he'll have to pack it and send it back to you, have to use time and money to get the goods back to you also. both of you have some form of loss from this deal. ok how about like this both contribute to the cost of a new housing for the PDA. 50/50, or whatever ratio you guys think feasible. I would suggest to change the housing of the phone (cost 50/50), after all I'm not selling him a defect item, I don't see any reason why I should full refund him moreover his main concern is the outlook of the phone. QUOTE(kevin613 @ Jul 30 2007, 04:12 PM) referring to this pic from buyer i don't see any problem with the bottom part that u highlighted.. that could just simply be an underexposed part.. dun over-react with your "findings".. It would be better if you could put the pictures into the spoiler. or goldfries could you spoiler his pics? Thanks in advance This post has been edited by vikingw2k: Jul 30 2007, 06:06 PM |
|
|
Jul 30 2007, 04:40 PM
|
![]()
Junior Member
32 posts Joined: Apr 2006 From: Malaysia |
QUOTE(fuzzy @ Jul 30 2007, 04:28 PM) Haven't been reading all 12 pages but I do think both sides do bear responsibility in this. as a normal customer and not as a serious trader, i will say he has to refund fully, coz, it is not 95% condition and but below 80% which is a kind of cheating. I have seen lot of threads selling pda's and phones here in LOWYAT and normally all the critical scratches (if have) will be highlighted clearly and this was not done at all. Come one lah brothers, this case is soooo n sooo obvious lah. As a buyer he has all the rights to ask for refund. If this case was not involved by any elite or admin members, the seller would have been assigned with DISPUTE alredi. Kind of not fair as well.But wanting a full refund a slightly unfair to the seller, especially when he has stated that it was 95% condition, while slightly misleading, he has not totally covered up the fact that it was not in perfect condition. And the buyer bears the responsibility of buying something this precious to him online and without looking at it, also for not asking the exact reason why the seller mention is 95% condition. Since the damaged cover is the source of dispute, can't both parties fork out half to exchange it? At least it'll sort this out? |
|
|
Jul 30 2007, 05:07 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,285 posts Joined: Mar 2007 |
TS i suggest both of u should bear the cost of changing new housing..
for TS : u buy the pda phone bcoz u need it rite? do u willing to return to viking since the pda phone is ur ''wants''? u hav to spend ur time again to search for the next pda phone to replace viking 1...it would be costly ..i mean time consuming.. so just try to bear the repair/changing new housing cost..that would b nice..TS can continue using ur pda instead of spending time looking for the other 1 and viking can hav his problem solved... TS try to discuss wif viking regarding to the cost..mayb 40/60? my 2 bucks =.=v This post has been edited by sam0919: Jul 30 2007, 05:08 PM |
|
|
Jul 30 2007, 05:12 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
12,505 posts Joined: May 2007 From: Triumph in the Skies Status:In LoV3 Again |
QUOTE(selvalives @ Jul 30 2007, 04:40 PM) as a normal customer and not as a serious trader, i will say he has to refund fully, coz, it is not 95% condition and but below 80% which is a kind of cheating. I have seen lot of threads selling pda's and phones here in LOWYAT and normally all the critical scratches (if have) will be highlighted clearly and this was not done at all. Come one lah brothers, this case is soooo n sooo obvious lah. As a buyer he has all the rights to ask for refund. If this case was not involved by any elite or admin members, the seller would have been assigned with DISPUTE alredi. Kind of not fair as well. @ bold sentence, refer the quote below.QUOTE(se7en @ Jul 30 2007, 09:16 AM) |
|
|
Jul 30 2007, 05:22 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,287 posts Joined: Jun 2007 From: Anno Domini Time Ultra: 1,000,000 Trans Am Attack! |
Hell no viking, Don't ever agree on refund him as you already sell the items in perfect condition except the housing. You're not selling him a defect items as himself claim all in perfect condition. So discuss with him either each of you forkout (50/50) This is fair to both or buyer itself bare all the cost. Easy.
Don't shoot me and if you wanted to ask why viking won't fork out full to buy a new housing for buyer, here's the answer : Both Parties deny who the one in the first place to cause the crack. So the ONLY BEST SOLUTION is both fork out 50/50. FAIR. |
|
|
Jul 30 2007, 05:25 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
7,106 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
QUOTE(selvalives @ Jul 30 2007, 04:40 PM) as a normal customer and not as a serious trader, i will say he has to refund fully, coz, it is not 95% condition and but below 80% which is a kind of cheating. I have seen lot of threads selling pda's and phones here in LOWYAT and normally all the critical scratches (if have) will be highlighted clearly and this was not done at all. Come one lah brothers, this case is soooo n sooo obvious lah. As a buyer he has all the rights to ask for refund. If this case was not involved by any elite or admin members, the seller would have been assigned with DISPUTE alredi. Kind of not fair as well. As se7en said, the normal rules apply to him as well and he'll be assigned a disputed tag if this isn't solved in three days. There is no rule that a seller have to post pictures that mentions all the scratches on the item. Heck, I see alot of people selling items without any pictures, but ask us to come view it ourselves due to many reasons.And I do not see any mention of the phone being defected in terms of the performance, so it doesn't deserve a 80% listing, though we know this is a very grey area that no one can fully judge as it's up to the seller and buyer. The buyer know there was a problem with the unit, and while it might be a trick / oversight by the seller not to post the area in dispute, it is also the buyer's responsibility to check the item before buying it. Especially with this amount involved. Thats why I said both parties are at fault. As a buyer he has the right to demand for a refund, but as a seller viking has the right to contest it as well. I would say both should bear the charges of a new casing because that is the only area of dispute unless there is a performance defect due to the scratches (oh the cause of the scratches). |
|
|
Jul 30 2007, 05:41 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
12,505 posts Joined: May 2007 From: Triumph in the Skies Status:In LoV3 Again |
QUOTE(temptation1314 @ Jul 30 2007, 05:22 PM) Hell no viking, Don't ever agree on refund him as you already sell the items in perfect condition except the housing. You're not selling him a defect items as himself claim all in perfect condition. So discuss with him either each of you forkout (50/50) This is fair to both or buyer itself bare all the cost. Easy. It's not perfect then Don't shoot me and if you wanted to ask why viking won't fork out full to buy a new housing for buyer, here's the answer : Both Parties deny who the one in the first place to cause the crack. So the ONLY BEST SOLUTION is both fork out 50/50. FAIR. Viking claimed it was in normal wear and tear condition, but the item didn't turn out to be the one mentioned by Viking, in fact it was in bad condition. |
|
|
Jul 30 2007, 06:13 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,241 posts Joined: Jun 2005 From: Klang |
description made by the seller is important,but in this case how can one actually differentiate the meaning of 95% and 80% scratchless?do you actually measure every square inch of the phone and count the amount of scratchess?it's actually debatable but however,our mr.viking SHOULD have highlighted the fact that a HUGE scratch existed,and imo describing it as 95% is kinda dishonest,not done in good faith.with his HUGE experience(all the bragging bout his tradelist)he has no excuse to NOT know what is actually 80% and 95%.this issue is subjective and can only be valued among frequent traders who use this percentage figures to describe the phone's appearances.i feel majority will agree with the agrieved party that the condition is NOT 95%. as said.someone like me who's sold quite a huge number of phones together with all the other sellers here can tell what's a 95% condtion and a 80% condition..it's tricky,like describing how fat is someone,or as the proverb says beauty is in the eye of the beholder.put it this way:
1:the description is actually intended to be a contractual term which BOTH parties especially the buyer intended it to be... 2:viking INDUCED the agrieved guy to buy it knowing he's description is not true..this is a case of misrepresentation.in laymen terms,TIPU. 3:threadstarter,just bring it to the CONSUMERS TRIBUNAL,only rm5 to make a claim.if u bring this to court and sue him,u can only sue for a new housing,and what will the legal fees cost?easily four figure. ps:threadstarter,the other day i bought a nokia8850 from mr b.*.*(safetrader,5 star member.store owner?),via post,claimed it was scratchless and guess what?the phone lookedl like shit.screwed him up,and he refunded me half the price back for a new housing as the phone was working well. This post has been edited by seruzz2003: Jul 30 2007, 06:17 PM |
|
|
Jul 30 2007, 07:20 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,138 posts Joined: Dec 2006 |
QUOTE(fuzzy @ Jul 30 2007, 04:28 PM) ....... TS already ask the seller before deal is confirm....u can refer to the first page!! but the seller answer is not so clear ( seller answer is "u can just refer to the pic i provide"!!! )....is it too hard to tell buyer that the item have a little scratch at the top or at the bottom ??? ( that's when the item were in seller hand right??!! )But wanting a full refund a slightly unfair to the seller, especially when he has stated that it was 95% condition, while slightly misleading, he has not totally covered up the fact that it was not in perfect condition. And the buyer bears the responsibility of buying something this precious to him online and without looking at it, also for not asking the exact reason why the seller mention is 95% condition. Since the damaged cover is the source of dispute, can't both parties fork out half to exchange it? At least it'll sort this out? the problem is buyer felt cheated when the seller not clearly stated the scratch part ( big or small scratch i think it's really doesn't matter as long as the seller told it was there in the first place )...and the part of the seller was a Elite member group for this forum and also have some kind of speacial tag makes buyer seriously trusted the seller!!! |
|
|
Jul 30 2007, 07:34 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,158 posts Joined: Apr 2005 From: -Butterworth, Penang- |
is changing housing can avoid the warranty...if yes then how to change housing..???
the other things is imei on phone and imei on warranty card is not same... seller say can claim but how sure is claimable |
|
|
Jul 30 2007, 07:34 PM
|
|
VIP
9,778 posts Joined: Jun 2005 From: KL(Wangsa Maju) , Seremban 2 |
QUOTE(selvalives @ Jul 30 2007, 04:40 PM) bla bla bla QUOTE(KTCY @ Jul 30 2007, 05:41 PM) bla bla bla QUOTE(seruzz2003 @ Jul 30 2007, 06:13 PM) bla bla bla..... Such a pity to see that you guys are such shallow minded people. Go through all the pages and understand the flow before start blurting and accusing blindly. If you guys have the urge to let go your 2 cents, let me remind you this is not the right place to do so. You may discharge your 2 cents else where. TS and I would appreciate it if you have something useful to contribute. I've proposed my solution for this. Awaiting buyer's reply. p/s: For those who so happened to bump into this thread, refrain from posting here just for the sake of posting. Do read the whole thread, understand it clearly, and only reply if you have a fair suggestion for both of us instead of bla-ing some nonsense here. QUOTE(stevenlee @ Jul 30 2007, 07:34 PM) is changing housing can avoid the warranty...if yes then how to change housing..??? the other things is imei on phone and imei on warranty card is not same... seller say can claim but how sure is claimable 1. Changing housing will not void the warranty if it's sent back to Asus Service Centre. 2. He can claim it anytime from Asus Service Centre. I've given him the warranty card as well This post has been edited by vikingw2k: Jul 30 2007, 07:40 PM |
|
|
Jul 30 2007, 07:42 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
478 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Kuantan, PAHANG |
refund me in full amount, i send back the PDA, i pay the courier service, u open a new sale thread to sale the PDA again, dont forget to give correct infos in you thread, this is the best way for you to get ur reputation back..
|
|
|
Jul 30 2007, 07:47 PM
|
|
VIP
9,778 posts Joined: Jun 2005 From: KL(Wangsa Maju) , Seremban 2 |
QUOTE(ad_rv4 @ Jul 30 2007, 07:42 PM) refund me in full amount, i send back the PDA, i pay the courier service, u open a new sale thread to sale the PDA again, dont forget to give correct infos in you thread, this is the best way for you to get ur reputation back.. For the fairness of both sides, I would propose - send the phone to skinning - change the housing Both the cost 50/50 seruz2003 - Be polite This post has been edited by vikingw2k: Jul 30 2007, 07:50 PM |
|
|
Jul 30 2007, 07:55 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,651 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
QUOTE(ad_rv4 @ Jul 30 2007, 07:42 PM) refund me in full amount, i send back the PDA, i pay the courier service, u open a new sale thread to sale the PDA again, dont forget to give correct infos in you thread, this is the best way for you to get ur reputation back.. Both party still unable to come to agreement.I suggest it to be like this. TS use 3 days to post in garage sales to sell this PDA with full picture of the pda as oppose to Viking last time at the same price.If there is buyer,Case solve. If there is no buyer,it means there are something wrong at the first place,the trading between TS and viking. Since this is internet sales,If there is a problem after the sales and no solution for it.Both will consider at fault no matter what. TS go ask asus how much for the new casing,both share the cost.Viking bank in half of the money to TS since the pda is with TS. after that, this case will be review by all the moderator due to suspicision of misleading/cheating sales whether seller is guilty or not. |
|
|
Jul 30 2007, 08:05 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
478 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Kuantan, PAHANG |
if i return it back, u got no problem to sell it again right???? with ur tag as 'elite member' and 'trade enforcer' must got buyer thats really interested...and oso u got ur potential buyer b4 this..the person who with you b4 u post the item...correct me if i wrong.. the PDA now only 3 weeks old, still like new la bro..
|
|
|
Jul 30 2007, 08:18 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,138 posts Joined: Dec 2006 |
QUOTE(budakdegilz @ Jul 30 2007, 07:20 PM) TS already ask the seller before deal is confirm....u can refer to the first page!! but the seller answer is not so clear ( seller answer is "u can just refer to the pic i provide"!!! )....is it too hard to tell buyer that the item have a little scratch at the top or at the bottom ??? ( that's when the item were in seller hand right??!! ) how about my propose??the problem is buyer felt cheated when the seller not clearly stated the scratch part ( big or small scratch i think it's really doesn't matter as long as the seller told it was there in the first place )...and the part of the seller was a Elite member group for this forum and also have some kind of speacial tag makes buyer seriously trusted the seller!!! *with great power comes great responsibility...think about that vikingw2k!! |
|
|
Jul 30 2007, 08:33 PM
|
![]()
Junior Member
41 posts Joined: Feb 2006 From: PeRaK & Kay HeLL |
QUOTE(goldfries @ Jul 30 2007, 12:05 AM) and to the rest of you idiots who just to spam and flame, this is NOT funny and i'm going to take action as well if you guys don't quit your act. dude... please be extra careful when using words.. even though u r a mod or watever.. mind ur words dude..just because i share my opinion which is against Viking for this case, that doesn't mean you barge in and talk crap and all. This post has been edited by kireken: Jul 30 2007, 08:35 PM |
|
|
Jul 30 2007, 08:35 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,158 posts Joined: Apr 2005 From: -Butterworth, Penang- |
u still have 2 hours more and still not solve it has reach 3 days and ur tag will be on hold as admin stated...
|
|
|
Jul 30 2007, 08:45 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
12,505 posts Joined: May 2007 From: Triumph in the Skies Status:In LoV3 Again |
QUOTE(vikingw2k @ Jul 30 2007, 07:34 PM) Such a pity to see that you guys are such shallow minded people. Go through all the pages and understand the flow before start blurting and accusing blindly. If you guys have the urge to let go your 2 cents, let me remind you this is not the right place to do so. You may discharge your 2 cents else where. TS and I would appreciate it if you have something useful to contribute. I've proposed my solution for this. Awaiting buyer's reply. Yeah right. We are shallow minded people that don't know how to think like a person with Elite tag and trade enforcer that comes out a solution for buyer to bear something that isn't really suppose to bear by the buyer.p/s: For those who so happened to bump into this thread, refrain from posting here just for the sake of posting. Do read the whole thread, understand it clearly, and only reply if you have a fair suggestion for both of us instead of bla-ing some nonsense here. 1. Changing housing will not void the warranty if it's sent back to Asus Service Centre. 2. He can claim it anytime from Asus Service Centre. I've given him the warranty card as well With this kind of attitude and always get complain by fellow LYN peeps, I wonder how come the administration of LYN never investigate whether you're still a reliable person and whether you're fit in doing your job as a Trade Enforcer that will gain respect from all the trader in Trade Zone. Well, I know you will say I'm spamming but I'm just posting this up because the way you post up a message really show how irresponsible you are. Every people can voice out their opinion I believe and maybe some of them are spamming (I never deny I might be the one) but we posted those messages up because we feel that it is unfair to TS. I'm out from here and hope TS will get a good solution from this. This is a lesson to all that even with those title or tag or even traded for how many deals, when it comes to problem, human will always push their responsibility away. Till then. OT : p/s : Taking photo with |
|
|
Jul 30 2007, 09:03 PM
|
![]()
Junior Member
32 posts Joined: Apr 2006 From: Malaysia |
the summary is BUYER has been cheated by an ELITE MEMBER, and this ELITE MEMBER is not taking responsibility. IF he is really a good and trusted ELITE MEMBER, he should throw the cash back to the buyer because he should think that this little money should not spoil his big reputation with few hundred thousands of sale. THIS MAKE SENSE right ? come one lah. i have seen ur sales and list :
"My Successful Tradelist -Sold RM179457 -Bought RM75634, Total RM255091.00 (500 Deals) " 1200 is nothing compare to these amount right ? and you are going to get back ur material and u still can sell it back. of course u can't sell it at 1.2 but atleast at 800-900. So, the lost is about 300 only which is again nothing compare to your total sale. Added on July 30, 2007, 9:13 pmand the critical part is why the BUYER need to spend again for the material that he bought. This is sooo n sooo ridiculous. He bought the PDA, so that he can use. He did not buy the PDA to repair or change the casing. SOUNDS SOOOO FUNNY. He didn't buy the PDA like a second hand car which for sure will have problem soon and need to be repaired. I m not disturbing people's business here or spamming, but just to highlight here that this problem is not critical which needs CSI, but soo simple and obvious where the fault is on seller's side. This post has been edited by selvalives: Jul 30 2007, 09:13 PM |
|
|
Jul 30 2007, 09:26 PM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
284 posts Joined: Nov 2005 From: Selayang, KL |
wahhh... this is better than harry potter books!!
but seriously la.. moderators or trade enforcers or whoever in charge, this case have to be resovled quickly before it gets out of hand. im a newbie here and im not siding with anyone, but i do think there should be rules or court for these such cases, because nanti ppl will go blaming here n there last2 everyone get involved. LYN mainly Malaysian fourmers, u buy ke u sell ke orang malaysia jugak kan? u nak tipu ke apa ke mana mau lari, betul tak? kalau macam ni, in the future everyone would not trust buying online kat LYN, regardless of tags or no tags. right? jangan marah saya budak baru belajar, kalau salah tolong ajarkan! |
|
|
Jul 30 2007, 10:24 PM
|
|
Forum Admin
44,415 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
QUOTE(kireken @ Jul 30 2007, 08:33 PM) dude... please be extra careful when using words.. even though u r a mod or watever.. mind ur words dude.. mind you i'm selective with my words, IDIOT is not a rough word and it was chosen to be part of that sentence as it is an apt description of certain people. now stick to the topic or else you're just no better than those idiots that come in and post either crap or flaming materials. Added on July 30, 2007, 10:26 pm QUOTE(ameque @ Jul 30 2007, 09:26 PM) wahhh... this is better than harry potter books!! ameque. but seriously la.. moderators or trade enforcers or whoever in charge, this case have to be resovled quickly before it gets out of hand. im a newbie here and im not siding with anyone, but i do think there should be rules or court for these such cases, because nanti ppl will go blaming here n there last2 everyone get involved. LYN mainly Malaysian fourmers, u buy ke u sell ke orang malaysia jugak kan? u nak tipu ke apa ke mana mau lari, betul tak? kalau macam ni, in the future everyone would not trust buying online kat LYN, regardless of tags or no tags. right? jangan marah saya budak baru belajar, kalau salah tolong ajarkan! 1. The moderators are not here to resolve your disputes, neither are they here to help you out. This subforum is for you to resolve your disputes in an organised and easy to follow manner. c'mon guys. please have some decency to read (and UNDERSTAND) before posting. Trade Zone rules and regulations are stated clearly. How a case is settle depends on buyer and seller, LYN will not be involved in such matters. This post has been edited by goldfries: Jul 30 2007, 10:27 PM |
|
|
Jul 30 2007, 10:28 PM
|
|
VIP
9,778 posts Joined: Jun 2005 From: KL(Wangsa Maju) , Seremban 2 |
QUOTE(ad_rv4 @ Jul 30 2007, 08:05 PM) if i return it back, u got no problem to sell it again right???? with ur tag as 'elite member' and 'trade enforcer' must got buyer thats really interested...and oso u got ur potential buyer b4 this..the person who with you b4 u post the item...correct me if i wrong.. the PDA now only 3 weeks old, still like new la bro.. You sounded as if you are so desperate to claim for full refund. You voice out your dissatisfaction on the cosmetics which wasn't like that when i posted it out. I wouldn't wanna accuse you nor anybody for the damage for the sake of getting full refund probably because you found another better deal, and here I'm offering a solution which is by changing the housing which actually solves the entire cosmetic problem . I don't see a need of full refund as I'm not selling a defect item nor misleading you. p/s: Doesn't matter whether I've a buyer before this or not, we've committed a deal, you are voicing your dissatisfaction and I'm here offering you a solution. So please be reasonable. This post has been edited by vikingw2k: Jul 30 2007, 11:32 PM |
|
|
Jul 30 2007, 10:38 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
698 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
I totally agree with viking2k we also had to protect us as seller.
Scenario to study. 1. Viking2k give refund and when the items receive the items total not working then how? 2. The buyer will he pos the items to viking2k to check first before get the full refund? 3. Item damage during postal, or the phone receive are not the phone viking2k sold? |
|
|
Jul 30 2007, 11:12 PM
|
|
Moderator
2,083 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Penang |
Next bunch of morons that use this topic as forum to bash LYN author figures will have their posts reported by me.
You will not use this not this topic as a soapbox cry your dissatisfaction because you were discipline on earlier infractions of conduct. Is that understood? |
|
|
Jul 30 2007, 11:19 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,651 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
both still havent come into agreement and 45 mins more before both get dispute tag.
|
|
|
Jul 30 2007, 11:21 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
640 posts Joined: May 2005 From: Sarawak |
Hmm.... both provided solution.. buyer request refund, seller request changing housing...
refund wont work as seller rejected, changing housing better send to Asus or else the warranty will probably void like what the seller said before, buyer agree with this? well seller left a bad impression for me as at first the seller should at least mention a) there's a crack and he dint deny it but he also dint inform the buyer. CRACK = SCRATCH ?? and yet he say he described it and show photos for the buyer to decide first before he confirm to buy it. should had mention the CRACK b) he's trying to find some witness that the top part of the phone is not in the condition like the buyer received. at first he never deny there's a big crack but he dint even bother to tell the buyer, even though their deal is made, buyer asking about the crack, seller juz ask him to refer to the picture and say cant describe that subjectively. if people asking where is the crack/scratch, if you cant DESCRIBE it with your own words, perhaps you should take PHOTOS and show him directly even better. then now the seller saying the crack wasn't suppose to be that serious, then situation change to accuse the buyer fault. he even ask the previous owner regarding the dent, why need to ask or you can see the dent yourself? and where's all the witnesses, they juz come here to see the photo then sms/pm you back?? they cant bother to reply here? when normal user sell something over RM1k without showing the dent, oh gosh everyone will flame on him and call him CONman and ask him stop denying those facts. i guess those SAFE TRADER/TRADE ENFORCER can go check those hp selling at lowyat.net or outside.. see got dent or scratches or wat.. sure sell cheap cheap or half price.... bring back take nice angle photo .... sell good price to outstation buyer only.. when they complain, ask them send back to replace casing and split the cost to 50/50... still earning lots of $$$ nice deal actually.. juz my 2 cents ~~ dont know who's wrong or right but hope everything goes fine... sorry if wat i write maybe be on the buyer side** This post has been edited by ingjoo: Jul 30 2007, 11:22 PM |
|
|
Jul 30 2007, 11:26 PM
|
|
VIP
9,778 posts Joined: Jun 2005 From: KL(Wangsa Maju) , Seremban 2 |
QUOTE(ingjoo @ Jul 30 2007, 11:21 PM) Hmm.... both provided solution.. buyer request refund, seller request changing housing... I wonder why you guys keep missing the quote below. Read it over and over again before commenting about the scratches / dent thing. I've stated clearly my reasons why I didn't deny it straight away but decided to remain silent for few days when he posted the pictures of the damage.refund wont work as seller rejected, changing housing better send to Asus or else the warranty will probably void like what the seller said before, buyer agree with this? well seller left a bad impression for me as at first the seller should at least mention a) there's a crack and he dint deny it but he also dint inform the buyer. CRACK = SCRATCH ?? and yet he say he described it and show photos for the buyer to decide first before he confirm to buy it. should had mention the CRACK b) he's trying to find some witness that the top part of the phone is not in the condition like the buyer received. at first he never deny there's a big crack but he dint even bother to tell the buyer, even though their deal is made, buyer asking about the crack, seller juz ask him to refer to the picture and say cant describe that subjectively. if people asking where is the crack/scratch, if you cant DESCRIBE it with your own words, perhaps you should take PHOTOS and show him directly even better. then now the seller saying the crack wasn't suppose to be that serious, then situation change to accuse the buyer fault. he even ask the previous owner regarding the dent, why need to ask or you can see the dent yourself? and where's all the witnesses, they juz come here to see the photo then sms/pm you back?? they cant bother to reply here? when normal user sell something over RM1k without showing the dent, oh gosh everyone will flame on him and call him CONman and ask him stop denying those facts. i guess those SAFE TRADER/TRADE ENFORCER can go check those hp selling at lowyat.net or outside.. see got dent or scratches or wat.. sure sell cheap cheap or half price.... bring back take nice angle photo .... sell good price to outstation buyer only.. when they complain, ask them send back to replace casing and split the cost to 50/50... still earning lots of $$$ nice deal actually.. juz my 2 cents ~~ dont know who's wrong or right but hope everything goes fine... sorry if wat i write maybe be on the buyer side** QUOTE(vikingw2k @ Jul 30 2007, 01:01 AM) I've said earlier on, when he posted the pictures, instead of firing back I called and try to locate those few person who have seen that set before p/s: forummer Malaysian, I don't think that we need a referee service here. We are here to discuss in a orderly manner, only post here if you have useful suggestion on resolving this issue.I asked them, how was the condition of the phone, and is there a big damage on the top. Of course i have to confirm with them before reporting back here. If all of them told me that they saw a big damage there, of course I would have just admitted that it was my fault. I just wanna make sure before i start to post here. Also i finally manage to contact the previous owner for his statement by 10 something. p/s: with this kinda mentality, do you think they would trust me if i denied it on the first day before i could post anything to back my statements? I believe they would start accusing me blindly saying that I'm trying to push around which is why i decided to remain calm, and further investigate before posting back on this thread. This post has been edited by vikingw2k: Jul 30 2007, 11:37 PM |
|
|
Jul 30 2007, 11:42 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
8,913 posts Joined: Mar 2005 |
My suggestion, don't flame me for suggesting noob suggestion.
Since you guys are into to solve the problem, why not temporary close this thread. Discuss on the matter on how to solve the problem personally. If both still yet to agree into the matter into solutions offering by each another, then reopen back this thread. No point opening this thread arguing here and there. You two have the intention to solve the problem, so why not solve it personally 1st? Maybe you guys will said I didn't read the conversation. I can see TS keep on disagree with viking offer or solution. Why not again try to solve it personally again? |
|
|
Jul 31 2007, 12:12 AM
|
|
Forum Admin
44,415 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
Joshua_0718, actually i wanted to close the thread yesterday.
but at this point, i think closing it will not make a difference. already have so many viewers. it's good for transparency sake also la, after all already started. better not close also cos there will be silly people accuse us of being biased by closing thread because it's related to TE. |
|
|
Jul 31 2007, 12:17 AM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
152 posts Joined: Jun 2007 From: Perak |
is this case solved oredi? TS or Viking can u pls update on this matter..
|
|
|
Jul 31 2007, 12:28 AM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
76 posts Joined: Mar 2006 |
In my opinion I do think the best way is for Viking to refund it back..otherwise it may affect his reputation..
or in other way why dun both of u come out and talk bout it face to face rather than posting here..but no solution cheers juz my 2cents |
|
|
Jul 31 2007, 12:38 AM
|
|
VIP
9,778 posts Joined: Jun 2005 From: KL(Wangsa Maju) , Seremban 2 |
QUOTE(wandzul @ Jul 31 2007, 12:17 AM) Awaiting buyer's reply and comments on my suggestion.QUOTE(ng121 @ Jul 31 2007, 12:28 AM) In my opinion I do think the best way is for Viking to refund it back..otherwise it may affect his reputation.. I would love to, unfortunately he's from other state, TS, frankly I would like to solve this asap with the best solution for both of us. Do let me know what's your say.or in other way why dun both of u come out and talk bout it face to face rather than posting here..but no solution cheers juz my 2cents This post has been edited by vikingw2k: Jul 31 2007, 01:32 AM |
|
|
Jul 31 2007, 01:36 AM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
284 posts Joined: Nov 2005 From: Selayang, KL |
QUOTE(goldfries @ Jul 30 2007, 10:24 PM) mind you i'm selective with my words, IDIOT is not a rough word and it was chosen to be part of that sentence as it is an apt description of certain people. goldfries. now stick to the topic or else you're just no better than those idiots that come in and post either crap or flaming materials. Added on July 30, 2007, 10:26 pm ameque. 1. The moderators are not here to resolve your disputes, neither are they here to help you out. This subforum is for you to resolve your disputes in an organised and easy to follow manner. c'mon guys. please have some decency to read (and UNDERSTAND) before posting. Trade Zone rules and regulations are stated clearly. How a case is settle depends on buyer and seller, LYN will not be involved in such matters. my bad. didnt read before writing. sorry . like i said budak baru belajar... but if never reach any solution then how? both kena ban or wat? i think a lot of ppl in LYN wanna know how this case settle because banyak orang dah kena like this before. nak report polis pun small matter but still rasa kena con (Buyer or Seller), reputation pun tarnish (seller), but if buat sikap 'not my problem' pun then can kena con again n again (buyer) ... get what i mean? jangan marah2 eh. hope u guys settle baik2 eh. |
|
|
Jul 31 2007, 01:39 AM
|
|
Moderator
2,083 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Penang |
We should close this thread since vikingw2k rejected the TS solution it is up the the TS to either reject vikingw2k's or accept it. vikingw2k should not be defaulted in getting the dispute tag on waiting for ad_rv4's decision.
|
|
|
Jul 31 2007, 06:48 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,158 posts Joined: Apr 2005 From: -Butterworth, Penang- |
QUOTE(RangerRed @ Jul 31 2007, 01:39 AM) We should close this thread since vikingw2k rejected the TS solution it is up the the TS to either reject vikingw2k's or accept it. vikingw2k should not be defaulted in getting the dispute tag on waiting for ad_rv4's decision. what u mean by that....if viking reject u can close the tread???since this also happen to TE, i dun think ppl will put thier faith in TE anymore since this case also can happen.... furthermore the RangerRed statement seem like treaten the TS cos it sound like TE can close the tread since viking reject and it is forcing TS to accept viking offer or else close... This post has been edited by stevenlee: Jul 31 2007, 06:49 AM |
|
|
Jul 31 2007, 06:52 AM
|
|
Elite
5,434 posts Joined: Dec 2006 |
actually there is a very good solution already,skinning by 50/50,then no need to make so much problem here mah...
if refund is quite unfair to the seller too cause we never know who did the damage actually right? so TS,why dont u just accept the offer? if u return it back,u need to waste sometime to get urself a new PDA,u bought from viking means that u like it and u need it right? just change a new housing then everything settle already,u got ur PDA to use which will become 100% perfect condition and seller will solve his problem over here. |
|
|
Jul 31 2007, 06:56 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
478 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Kuantan, PAHANG |
y need to close this thread??? i got good reason to get my money back, dont lets this kind of people (seller) trade here in lowyat, u seller dont deserve to gimme ur solution of what u hv done b4, common la, dont try to cheat people to get ur benefits, actually ur the one who really desperate to get $$$, seller dont practic the ehtical way of selling, this will be bad if u let him to trade here again...
|
|
|
Jul 31 2007, 07:01 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,158 posts Joined: Apr 2005 From: -Butterworth, Penang- |
QUOTE(AceCombat @ Jul 31 2007, 06:52 AM) actually there is a very good solution already,skinning by 50/50,then no need to make so much problem here mah... sock out 50/50 is ok if the cost just few right...now is chaging an original PDA casing with distributor u think will be cheap....a normal original hp casing also cost more than RM100 if change out side shop...and now is sending back to distributor to change will cost a bomb... and now buyer has to put out more money than before..is that fair..if refund is quite unfair to the seller too cause we never know who did the damage actually right? so TS,why dont u just accept the offer? if u return it back,u need to waste sometime to get urself a new PDA,u bought from viking means that u like it and u need it right? just change a new housing then everything settle already,u got ur PDA to use which will become 100% perfect condition and seller will solve his problem over here. |
|
|
Jul 31 2007, 07:16 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
551 posts Joined: Dec 2005 |
My Q to seller
You said, every item u're selling, u will take 6 high-res pics w/ dslr camera for it, right? In the pda thread, u've taken each side of the phone EXCEPT the top part. Do explain y u dont snap the top part? If u cannot get a picture from the previous seller for the top part indicating the crack / hole / scratch, I say, the crack / hole / scratch is already there n you're conning TS for this. But we are not trying to prove who is wrong or who is right here. we are helping to find a solution, right? so here goes.. My Solution Why dont TS send back the phone to seller, and seller change the skin / casing / housing w/ cost for all (postage + new housing + whatever charges occured) beared w/ both parties(50-50 or 60-40 or 70-30), since, seller is stating, changing will not void warranty, and TS is stating otherwise. I think it should be fair enough for both party. |
|
|
Jul 31 2007, 08:58 AM
|
![]()
Junior Member
32 posts Joined: Apr 2006 From: Malaysia |
i have seen and understood one thing so far clearly. "MOST" [not all] of the moderators and the high level members here are talking on the behalf of the seller and trying to protect the seller. THIS IS NOT FAIR. It is just like a murder case which has eye witness yet not been punished. SO UNFAIR.
This post has been edited by selvalives: Jul 31 2007, 09:06 AM |
|
|
Jul 31 2007, 09:27 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,287 posts Joined: Jun 2007 From: Anno Domini Time Ultra: 1,000,000 Trans Am Attack! |
QUOTE(KTCY @ Jul 30 2007, 05:41 PM) It's not perfect then Now here goes another useless comment.Viking claimed it was in normal wear and tear condition, but the item didn't turn out to be the one mentioned by Viking, in fact it was in bad condition. Did Viking said " I dropped the phone and it got crackes on the top of the phone and I didn't tell the buyer so that I can sell this off" ? Or Did TS said "When I received the phone, it was all in good condition until I accidently dropped the phone on the floor and make a crack on the top of the phone. If I make a dispute on LYN and accuse viking that he is irresponsible, Viking have no other way but to refund me the money and I buy another new phone"? Or Did PosLaju said " I dropped the package while delivering" OR "I open up the package to see what is inside and accidently dropped the phone" The matter now is nobody want to admit who did it, whether the buyer or seller, put aside the courier, we can't do anything. So the most fair fair decision is to share the losses. |
|
|
Jul 31 2007, 09:30 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
323 posts Joined: Jun 2006 From: You spelt "Harbl" wrongly and it wasn't a typo |
Simply, the buyer asked the seller of the damages and the seller states that the damages are as shown on the pics of which
1. The damage below the phone is hard to see unless you use l33t photoshop(R) photo filter skills. 2. The damage above the phone wasn't shown. The only angle not taken. Covered by the seller's thumb. Buyer gets the phone, wasn't satisfied with the condition, ask for a full refund postage costs deducted. Seller disagrees and claim buyer/poslaju damaged it. Seller offers to split cost of replacing the core casing which will cost a bomb, which isn't fair as the buyer accepted the condition of phone viewable on pictures. This post has been edited by jcheong: Jul 31 2007, 09:32 AM |
|
|
Jul 31 2007, 09:32 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,287 posts Joined: Jun 2007 From: Anno Domini Time Ultra: 1,000,000 Trans Am Attack! |
QUOTE(selvalives @ Jul 31 2007, 08:58 AM) i have seen and understood one thing so far clearly. "MOST" [not all] of the moderators and the high level members here are talking on the behalf of the seller and trying to protect the seller. THIS IS NOT FAIR. It is just like a murder case which has eye witness yet not been punished. SO UNFAIR. So do you have any proof that the buyer didn't make the crack?? Well god knows I'm not being sided to seller, neither buyer. I just speak something truth. No one at here can confirm who does and who doesn't. Added on July 31, 2007, 9:38 am QUOTE(jcheong @ Jul 31 2007, 09:30 AM) Simply, the buyer asked the seller of the damages and the seller states that the damages are as shown on the pics of which Refer to this quote1. The damage below the phone is hard to see unless you use l33t photoshop(R) photo filter skills. 2. The damage above the phone wasn't shown. The only angle not taken. Covered by the seller's thumb. Buyer gets the phone, wasn't satisfied with the condition, ask for a full refund postage costs deducted. Seller disagrees and claim buyer/poslaju damaged it. Seller offers to split cost of replacing the core casing which will cost a bomb, which isn't fair as the buyer accepted the condition of phone viewable on pictures. QUOTE(temptation1314 @ Jul 31 2007, 09:27 AM) Or Did TS said "When I received the phone, it was all in good condition until I accidently dropped the phone on the floor and make a crack on the top of the phone. If I make a dispute on LYN and accuse viking that he is irresponsible, Viking have no other way but to refund me the money and I buy another new phone"? This post has been edited by temptation1314: Jul 31 2007, 09:38 AM |
|
|
Jul 31 2007, 09:50 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
323 posts Joined: Jun 2006 From: You spelt "Harbl" wrongly and it wasn't a typo |
QUOTE(temptation1314 @ Jul 31 2007, 09:32 AM) Which that quote was from a sequence of IFs http://forum.lowyat.net/topic/495152/+260#Just in case someone got it mixed up. No proof from both sides. Both can come up with different stories. I guess it can't be solved. |
|
|
Jul 31 2007, 09:51 AM
|
|
Moderator
2,083 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Penang |
Close this thread and let you to 'discuss' it in pm. Then reopen it again when you either made up your minds or want to argue more.
|
|
|
Jul 31 2007, 09:52 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
885 posts Joined: Mar 2006 From: Johor Bahru |
Well, im standing on any1 side. But as a seller and a buyer myself, i would think that "SKINNING" or "CHANGING" the casing will be the most amicable solution.
@BUYER: You've been going on and on on asking viking to refund u. According to my understanding, viking didnt misled u in buying a defective stuff nor a fake stuff. Your problem is merely an exterior problem which can be solved with "SKINNING" or "CHANGING". I dont know what is the main "reason" for you to keep requesting for a full refund. |
|
|
Jul 31 2007, 09:55 AM
|
![]()
Junior Member
32 posts Joined: Apr 2006 From: Malaysia |
QUOTE(RangerRed @ Jul 31 2007, 09:51 AM) Close this thread and let you to 'discuss' it in pm. Then reopen it again when you either made up your minds or want to argue more. then what is the purpose of the moderators and other high level members. And what is the purpose of the management ?I m sure, LYN have a management team or something to discuss and decide on these kind of cases. |
|
|
Jul 31 2007, 09:57 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
478 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Kuantan, PAHANG |
to zyrl, better u read from the first page my friend, thanks for all comments and ideas
This post has been edited by ad_rv4: Jul 31 2007, 09:58 AM |
|
|
Jul 31 2007, 10:00 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
640 posts Joined: May 2005 From: Sarawak |
hehe..... haven't seen any of the WITNESS that the seller said reply in this thread... where are them?? i wonder...
well like i say both solution no fair for both parties coz we dont know who is right who is wrong... if the seller win this case by changing the skin only (confirm wont void the warranty) and split the cost to 50/50 (only apply to ST/TE/mod i can see coz if normal user will be CALL CON MAN~ and ask for full refund instead) then any ST/TE can buy 2nd crack/scratches HP then sell as 95% under half of the price then sell it with 95% high profit juz only need to replace the casing.. if the buyer win this case by refunding from the seller (of coz complain need to do by the day he receive the item) not after 1 month he accidentally drop it then any buyer can buy a 2nd HP testing for like around 1 week, since there will be lots of talks for around this period before he return to the seller for refund... nice way also to try all sorts of HP every week or 2 |
|
|
Jul 31 2007, 10:01 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
885 posts Joined: Mar 2006 From: Johor Bahru |
yes, i've read from first page till now, and i posted wat i wan. is there a problem with my posting?
|
|
|
Jul 31 2007, 10:06 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
478 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Kuantan, PAHANG |
|
|
|
Jul 31 2007, 10:17 AM
|
|
Moderator
2,083 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Penang |
ad_rv4, is the phone working 100% fine? As in, the screen works, the apps work, the phone call dial out and receive calls, the speakers and mics are loud and clear, etc?
|
|
|
Jul 31 2007, 10:21 AM
|
![]()
Junior Member
32 posts Joined: Apr 2006 From: Malaysia |
QUOTE(zyrl @ Jul 31 2007, 09:52 AM) Well, im standing on any1 side. But as a seller and a buyer myself, i would think that "SKINNING" or "CHANGING" the casing will be the most amicable solution. don't u understand that, the buyer is asking for full refund because he felt that the seller have cheated him by hiding the major scratch. Who will not get mad, if the item that has been claimed as 95% scratch less received with a big scratch. @BUYER: You've been going on and on on asking viking to refund u. According to my understanding, viking didnt misled u in buying a defective stuff nor a fake stuff. Your problem is merely an exterior problem which can be solved with "SKINNING" or "CHANGING". I dont know what is the main "reason" for you to keep requesting for a full refund. Of course the PDA can be skinned, but the buyer bought it in the intention of, it is still new coz was used only for few months. Just imagine how it has been handled if the skin has that kind of scratch and has to be changed. |
|
|
Jul 31 2007, 10:23 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
885 posts Joined: Mar 2006 From: Johor Bahru |
^ Refer to RangerRed post...
|
|
|
Jul 31 2007, 10:24 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
478 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Kuantan, PAHANG |
QUOTE(RangerRed @ Jul 31 2007, 10:17 AM) ad_rv4, is the phone working 100% fine? As in, the screen works, the apps work, the phone call dial out and receive calls, the speakers and mics are loud and clear, etc? i will answers ur questions after i get answers from u first, do u agreed that the seller cheated me to sell his PDA?????? |
|
|
Jul 31 2007, 10:25 AM
|
![]()
Junior Member
32 posts Joined: Apr 2006 From: Malaysia |
|
|
|
Jul 31 2007, 10:25 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,287 posts Joined: Jun 2007 From: Anno Domini Time Ultra: 1,000,000 Trans Am Attack! |
ad_rv4,
Be more common sense lar. It's getting my nerve as you are the one being childish. Does putting extra protection means he did it? Let's try if you send me an LCD, you nicely put everything in box and add some bubles for extra protection. So When I received the LCD, and I feel don't like and and purposely broke the LCD and ask you for refund. Got what I mean Kiddie? There's only a solution for this case, either you accept viking 50/50 losses for exchange the housing or you alone bare all the cost. Whether u accept or not, this is not a dispute case at all. It's just a whining from a small kid like you. |
|
|
Jul 31 2007, 10:27 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
12,505 posts Joined: May 2007 From: Triumph in the Skies Status:In LoV3 Again |
QUOTE(RangerRed @ Jul 31 2007, 10:17 AM) ad_rv4, is the phone working 100% fine? As in, the screen works, the apps work, the phone call dial out and receive calls, the speakers and mics are loud and clear, etc? Do that mean if the phone working perfectly and the outer part is spoil and as a buyer, he should just keep him mouth shut and accept the piece of junk he receive ? Will it be fair to him ?Your question are siding seller now |
|
|
Jul 31 2007, 10:28 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
885 posts Joined: Mar 2006 From: Johor Bahru |
QUOTE(selvalives @ Jul 31 2007, 10:25 AM) that is few months later and it is not regarding this matter. When that matter surfaced, he can always open a thread here AGAIN or send for warranty claim with ASUS as from today which he has 11 months left.QUOTE Items that do not carry any shop warranty will be given 3days standard personal warranty |
|
|
Jul 31 2007, 10:29 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
12,505 posts Joined: May 2007 From: Triumph in the Skies Status:In LoV3 Again |
QUOTE(temptation1314 @ Jul 31 2007, 10:25 AM) ad_rv4, Actually the solution is up to ad_rv4 to accept it or reject it. You can't force him to accept and the most important thing you're no one here to scold him like that Be more common sense lar. It's getting my nerve as you are the one being childish. Does putting extra protection means he did it? Let's try if you send me an LCD, you nicely put everything in box and add some bubles for extra protection. So When I received the LCD, and I feel don't like and and purposely broke the LCD and ask you for refund. Got what I mean Kiddie? There's only a solution for this case, either you accept viking 50/50 losses for exchange the housing or you alone bare all the cost. Whether u accept or not, this is not a dispute case at all. It's just a whining from a small kid like you. This post has been edited by KTCY: Jul 31 2007, 10:30 AM |
|
|
Jul 31 2007, 10:31 AM
|
![]()
Junior Member
32 posts Joined: Apr 2006 From: Malaysia |
QUOTE(temptation1314 @ Jul 31 2007, 10:25 AM) ad_rv4, hey man, u r just like the viking. u r here to support a conman. i m sure. this is soo obvious. lcd and pda got different.Be more common sense lar. It's getting my nerve as you are the one being childish. Does putting extra protection means he did it? Let's try if you send me an LCD, you nicely put everything in box and add some bubles for extra protection. So When I received the LCD, and I feel don't like and and purposely broke the LCD and ask you for refund. Got what I mean Kiddie? There's only a solution for this case, either you accept viking 50/50 losses for exchange the housing or you alone bare all the cost. Whether u accept or not, this is not a dispute case at all. It's just a whining from a small kid like you. ok. don't talk rubbish. this case is sooo clear where the seller hides the scratch. wht else u need ? |
|
|
Jul 31 2007, 10:31 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
885 posts Joined: Mar 2006 From: Johor Bahru |
QUOTE(KTCY @ Jul 31 2007, 10:27 AM) Do that mean if the phone working perfectly and the outer part is spoil and as a buyer, he should just keep him mouth shut and accept the piece of junk he receive ? Will it be fair to him ? this is not a matter of siding the seller or not. it is the matter of full refund. based on my understanding, a full refund is done when the item sold is faulty or fakefrom what the seller is saying he is selling. Your question are siding seller now from my POV, the item is working fine and functional as wat viking said. @selvalives: from the first page until now, clearly viking has said he is not aware of that dent or watchamacallit. he is also surprise "lets not get touchy on this authenticity". he never had the intention to cover the 'thing'. it a 'so-happen-my-thumb-covered-it' This post has been edited by zyrl: Jul 31 2007, 10:34 AM |
|
|
Jul 31 2007, 10:31 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
478 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Kuantan, PAHANG |
QUOTE(temptation1314 @ Jul 31 2007, 10:25 AM) ad_rv4, i dun mind to bare all the cost, better look at the first page friend..what im doing now not for me only, its for ur kids.. lowyat kidsBe more common sense lar. It's getting my nerve as you are the one being childish. Does putting extra protection means he did it? Let's try if you send me an LCD, you nicely put everything in box and add some bubles for extra protection. So When I received the LCD, and I feel don't like and and purposely broke the LCD and ask you for refund. Got what I mean Kiddie? There's only a solution for this case, either you accept viking 50/50 losses for exchange the housing or you alone bare all the cost. Whether u accept or not, this is not a dispute case at all. It's just a whining from a small kid like you. Added on July 31, 2007, 10:33 am QUOTE(selvalives @ Jul 31 2007, 10:31 AM) hey man, u r just like the viking. u r here to support a conman. i m sure. this is soo obvious. lcd and pda got different. ok. don't talk rubbish. this case is sooo clear where the seller hides the scratch. wht else u need ? this case is sooo clear where the seller hides the scratch why others dont notice this??? This post has been edited by ad_rv4: Jul 31 2007, 10:33 AM |
|
|
Jul 31 2007, 10:35 AM
|
![]()
Junior Member
32 posts Joined: Apr 2006 From: Malaysia |
QUOTE(zyrl @ Jul 31 2007, 10:28 AM) that is few months later and it is not regarding this matter. When that matter surfaced, he can always open a thread here AGAIN or send for warranty claim with ASUS as from today which he has 11 months left. i know that bro. but do u expect a 3 months phone to have problem. I know it could have but what is the chances ?and i m sure the buyer bought it because it is still new and could have less problems or no problems at all. now from the scratch, it could have problem most probably. Lets compare the chances bro. If your are the buyer and u have spent 1.2k for a pda which was used for 3 months, do u expect problem in few months. and do you know the hassle of sending it to the manufacturer. I M SURE THIS IS SOMETHING THAT EVERYONE WILL NOT EXPECT. This post has been edited by selvalives: Jul 31 2007, 10:42 AM |
|
|
Jul 31 2007, 10:41 AM
|
|
Moderator
2,083 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Penang |
ad_rv4, nope.... instead of contacting him and asking him to foot the bill for a new casing you come screaming like a little girl throw a tantrum.
You basis for a full refund is edge wear and tear on the PDA. Which happens from all accounts of your posts seems to be working perfectly fine except for that. Hell, even the screen looks scratches and there is no comments from about it. So, you expect vikingw2k to refund you the whole phone on something that? Hell, why not? I mean let's do it!!! Everyone here, that is not satisfied with the item you bought just scream that the wearing on it is not the same as discribed in the sales thread, send back your stuff and ask for full refunds!! Why, I think I'll do that too!! I mean I just got my Samsung T9 from soft_hack. There is some very light scratches on the screen which can't be seen when the screen is on but only when it is off and using full daylight. But no thats my a prob... my prob is a peeve that the T9 cannot be 'safely removed' using the Samsung media software or winxp usb 'safely remove' function. But it's ok the T9 can stll be removed safely just by checking the screen and seeing is there any data transferring or not. soft_hack send my money back now!!!! So vikingw2k may have made an error in judgement but it was not done purposedly as you can see one of the pictures does show wear and tear in it. So we still come back to the problem that the casing which is replaceable has unacceptable wearing on it. The phone works fine since you didn't make a fuss about it. vikingw2k, offers to settle situation with a 50-50 cost sharing for the casing. Instead of nego for a better rate for yourself you still b**** some more. Grow the hell up. |
|
|
Jul 31 2007, 10:43 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
885 posts Joined: Mar 2006 From: Johor Bahru |
@selvalives As the chinese saying, how much u spend is how much u get. If u scared that u spend RM1.2k on a 2nd hand HP, den please... by all means go buy a new phone.
everything in this world has risk. u wan to take the risk to buy a 2nd hand hp, u have to bear the risk. if every seller were to give confirmation stating that their 2nd hand item wun spoil, then what is the use for warranty? the way u are saying that @buyer shud refund the phone because u, selvalives foresee a problem which u dunno will happen in future or not. unless there is a concrete proof that the dent (from this case) is going to make the PDA spoil eventually in near future, i dont think this discussion regarding whether 3 months later the PDA will spoil should continue This post has been edited by zyrl: Jul 31 2007, 10:44 AM |
|
|
Jul 31 2007, 10:45 AM
|
![]()
Junior Member
32 posts Joined: Apr 2006 From: Malaysia |
QUOTE(zyrl @ Jul 31 2007, 10:31 AM) this is not a matter of siding the seller or not. it is the matter of full refund. based on my understanding, a full refund is done when the item sold is faulty or fakefrom what the seller is saying he is selling. HOW IF THE ITEM FOUND DIFFERENT THEN WHAT HAS BEEN CLAIMED. HOW IF THE BUYER GOT CHEATED.[quote] from my POV, the item is working fine and functional as wat viking said. @selvalives: from the first page until now, clearly viking has said he is not aware of that dent or watchamacallit. he is also surprise "lets not get touchy on this authenticity". he never had the intention to cover the 'thing'. it a 'so-happen-my-thumb-covered-it' [quote] THIS IS BULLSHIT. DOES NOT MAKE SENSE. COME ONE LAH, HOW COME VIKING DID NOT SEE This post has been edited by selvalives: Jul 31 2007, 10:45 AM |
|
|
Jul 31 2007, 10:45 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,287 posts Joined: Jun 2007 From: Anno Domini Time Ultra: 1,000,000 Trans Am Attack! |
QUOTE(ad_rv4 @ Jul 31 2007, 10:31 AM) i dun mind to bare all the cost, better look at the first page friend..what im doing now not for me only, its for ur kids.. lowyat kids Dun just give statement here. Show proof. Show proof that viking did it.Added on July 31, 2007, 10:33 am this case is sooo clear where the seller hides the scratch[/size] why others dont notice this??? QUOTE(selvalives @ Jul 31 2007, 10:31 AM) hey man, u r just like the viking. u r here to support a conman. i m sure. this is soo obvious. lcd and pda got different. Conman? I dun see any conman here. Use you brain before typing. Else, give us a proof that viking did it. Dun simple give a statement accusing other. You are in no position pointing a member here as conmen.ok. don't talk rubbish. this case is sooo clear where the seller hides the scratch. wht else u need ? |
|
|
Jul 31 2007, 10:46 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
478 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Kuantan, PAHANG |
QUOTE(RangerRed @ Jul 31 2007, 10:41 AM) ad_rv4, nope.... instead of contacting him and asking him to foot the bill for a new casing you come screaming like a little girl throw a tantrum. dude , why i need to hear about ur samsung T9 bro, open ur new thread and story about ur PDA, handset, etc..etc.. dont forget to include reviews, haha, plz refer first page, thanks for ur comment You basis for a full refund is edge wear and tear on the PDA. Which happens from all accounts of your posts seems to be working perfectly fine except for that. Hell, even the screen looks scratches and there is no comments from about it. So, you expect vikingw2k to refund you the whole phone on something that? Hell, why not? I mean let's do it!!! Everyone here, that is not satisfied with the item you bought just scream that the wearing on it is not the same as discribed in the sales thread, send back your stuff and ask for full refunds!! Why, I think I'll do that too!! I mean I just got my Samsung T9 from soft_hack. There is some very light scratches on the screen which can't be seen when the screen is on but only when it is off and using full daylight. But no thats my a prob... my prob is a peeve that the T9 cannot be 'safely removed' using the Samsung media software or winxp usb 'safely remove' function. But it's ok the T9 can stll be removed safely just by checking the screen and seeing is there any data transferring or not. soft_hack send my money back now!!!! So vikingw2k may have made an error in judgement but it was not done purposedly as you can see one of the pictures does show wear and tear in it. So we still come back to the problem that the casing which is replaceable has unacceptable wearing on it. The phone works fine since you didn't make a fuss about it. vikingw2k, offers to settle situation with a 50-50 cost sharing for the casing. Instead of nego for a better rate for yourself you still b**** some more. Grow the hell up. |
|
|
Jul 31 2007, 10:48 AM
|
![]()
Junior Member
32 posts Joined: Apr 2006 From: Malaysia |
QUOTE(temptation1314 @ Jul 31 2007, 10:45 AM) Dun just give statement here. Show proof. Show proof that viking did it. AS I KNOW ALREADY, THE COMMUNITY HERE IS TRYING TO COVER UP A CHEATING CASE. READ FROM THE FIRST PAGE, U WILL KNOW. THAT IS WHAT I CAN SAYConman? I dun see any conman here. Use you brain before typing. Else, give us a proof that viking did it. Dun simple give a statement accusing other. You are in no position pointing a member here as conmen. |
|
|
Jul 31 2007, 10:52 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
885 posts Joined: Mar 2006 From: Johor Bahru |
QUOTE(selvalives @ Jul 31 2007, 10:45 AM) HOW IF THE ITEM FOUND DIFFERENT THEN WHAT HAS BEEN CLAIMED. HOW IF THE BUYER GOT CHEATED. QUOTE please dude.... please do not get to the WHAT IF, HOW IF, IF, IF IF. If i or u can predict what can happen in near future, u and i can become Zyrl Almighty or Selva Almighty.The item currently is not found different from what it is claimed and we will stop at that. |
|
|
Jul 31 2007, 10:53 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
478 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Kuantan, PAHANG |
QUOTE(selvalives @ Jul 31 2007, 10:48 AM) AS I KNOW ALREADY, THE COMMUNITY HERE IS TRYING TO COVER UP A CHEATING CASE. READ FROM THE FIRST PAGE, U WILL KNOW. THAT IS WHAT I CAN SAY why hidding?? coz their fren involved,haha, mostly coz of his tag 'elite member' and 'trade enforcer', get a life!!! admin need to do something about this or else, conman 'musang berbulu ayam' will appear.. |
|
|
Jul 31 2007, 10:55 AM
|
![]()
Junior Member
32 posts Joined: Apr 2006 From: Malaysia |
QUOTE(zyrl @ Jul 31 2007, 10:52 AM) please dude.... please do not get to the WHAT IF, HOW IF, IF, IF IF. If i or u can predict what can happen in near future, u and i can become Zyrl Almighty or Selva Almighty. COZ i am a programmer...aniway just for FUN....The item currently is not found different from what it is claimed and we will stop at that. just tell me , how come viking didn't see the scratch...tht is for sure bullshit. |
|
|
Jul 31 2007, 10:58 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
478 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Kuantan, PAHANG |
QUOTE(zyrl @ Jul 31 2007, 10:43 AM) @selvalives As the chinese saying, how much u spend is how much u get. If u scared that u spend RM1.2k on a 2nd hand HP, den please... by all means go buy a new phone. you bring ur bad chinese attitude here ker bro????? then u wat u r now, cannot see truth...everything in this world has risk. u wan to take the risk to buy a 2nd hand hp, u have to bear the risk. if every seller were to give confirmation stating that their 2nd hand item wun spoil, then what is the use for warranty? the way u are saying that @buyer shud refund the phone because u, selvalives foresee a problem which u dunno will happen in future or not. unless there is a concrete proof that the dent (from this case) is going to make the PDA spoil eventually in near future, i dont think this discussion regarding whether 3 months later the PDA will spoil should continue |
|
|
Jul 31 2007, 11:00 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
885 posts Joined: Mar 2006 From: Johor Bahru |
QUOTE(ad_rv4 @ Jul 31 2007, 10:53 AM) why hidding?? coz their fren involved,haha, mostly coz of his tag 'elite member' and 'trade enforcer', get a life!!! admin need to do something about this or else, conman 'musang berbulu ayam' will appear.. so now u urself is getting touchy. you are getting to the part that "OMG, He is an ELITE, TE." But from what i see, he is settling this with u under the name of SELLER. not under the authority that he is an ELITE or TE. He didnt emphasize that he is a ELITE or TE *so fear me*QUOTE(selvalives @ Jul 31 2007, 10:55 AM) COZ i am a programmer...aniway just for FUN.... that is not for me to answer. u wan answers? read thru the thread again.just tell me , how come viking didn't see the scratch...tht is for sure bullshit. Added on July 31, 2007, 11:01 am QUOTE(ad_rv4 @ Jul 31 2007, 10:58 AM) oh my my, flaming now are we? This post has been edited by zyrl: Jul 31 2007, 11:01 AM |
|
|
Jul 31 2007, 11:01 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,287 posts Joined: Jun 2007 From: Anno Domini Time Ultra: 1,000,000 Trans Am Attack! |
@ad_rv4
You keep on asking ppl to read first page while you're not even answering any question. You just keep denying and wanted a refund. You sound suspicious or not? Let's see the consequences that might had happen before QUOTE(temptation1314 @ Jul 31 2007, 09:27 AM) Did Viking said " I dropped the phone and it got crackes on the top of the phone and I didn't tell the buyer so that I can sell this off" ? Can you understand the above statement?? Or are you too stupid to understand the statement above??Or Did TS said "When I received the phone, it was all in good condition until I accidently dropped the phone on the floor and make a crack on the top of the phone. If I make a dispute on LYN and accuse viking that he is irresponsible, Viking have no other way but to refund me the money and I buy another new phone"? Or Did PosLaju said " I dropped the package while delivering" OR "I open up the package to see what is inside and accidently dropped the phone" |
|
|
Jul 31 2007, 11:01 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,659 posts Joined: Feb 2005 |
|
|
|
Jul 31 2007, 11:04 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
478 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Kuantan, PAHANG |
QUOTE(zyrl @ Jul 31 2007, 11:00 AM) so now u urself is getting touchy. you are getting to the part that "OMG, He is an ELITE, TE." But from what i see, he is settling this with u under the name of SELLER. not under the authority that he is an ELITE or TE. He didnt emphasize that he is a ELITE or TE *so fear me* SELLER and CHEATER are not the same, better read thru the thread again laa...that is not for me to answer. u wan answers? read thru the thread again. Added on July 31, 2007, 11:01 am oh my my, flaming now are we? Added on July 31, 2007, 11:07 am QUOTE(vincent_ng86 @ Jul 31 2007, 11:01 AM) trying to fight the truth, his chinese say not irrelevant to this matter.. if bought toto can laarr..heheThis post has been edited by ad_rv4: Jul 31 2007, 11:07 AM |
|
|
Jul 31 2007, 11:08 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
322 posts Joined: Dec 2006 From: Bangi |
i`m still dun understand why should this case solve peacefully..
da TS keep claiming for full refund.. it should no problem for u to send it to services center rite? since da warranty is still ther.. to Seller, 50/50 is more than enuf.. since u`ve stated ther in ur terms & condition... besides, claiming da warranty cost nothing rite? (except time consuming..) corrent me if i wrong.. |
|
|
Jul 31 2007, 11:10 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
478 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Kuantan, PAHANG |
it is about ehtical of selling, plz refer first page, tq
|
|
|
Jul 31 2007, 11:12 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
885 posts Joined: Mar 2006 From: Johor Bahru |
^ and what about the ethical of buying?
and please, stop referring ppl to the first page. |
|
|
Jul 31 2007, 11:12 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,659 posts Joined: Feb 2005 |
QUOTE(ad_rv4 @ Jul 31 2007, 11:04 AM) SELLER and CHEATER are not the same, better read thru the thread again laa... I didn't see where it is not relevant. He is just using a chinese quote, and you shouldn't be saying "bad chinese attitude" right? I recall somewhere you said you are a teacher? Added on July 31, 2007, 11:07 am trying to fight the truth, his chinese say not irrelevant to this matter.. if bought toto can laarr..hehe Since you are a teacher, please do solve this matter in a nice way and not saying things like that. |
|
|
Jul 31 2007, 11:13 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
322 posts Joined: Dec 2006 From: Bangi |
yap.. it is ethique.. but.. obviously it is sound suspecious when u r claiming for full refund..
if u google around, u will find dat most case like dis solved in 50/50 share.. since it is only involving the casing.. btw.. i`ve followed dis thread from the beginning.. |
|
|
Jul 31 2007, 11:14 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
5,417 posts Joined: May 2006 From: Bear Hill, Malacca |
QUOTE(temptation1314 @ Jul 31 2007, 10:25 AM) ad_rv4, from what i understand... what you are trying to say here is that ts broke the phone himself? then trying to blame viking...? Be more common sense lar. It's getting my nerve as you are the one being childish. Does putting extra protection means he did it? Let's try if you send me an LCD, you nicely put everything in box and add some bubles for extra protection. So When I received the LCD, and I feel don't like and and purposely broke the LCD and ask you for refund. Got what I mean Kiddie? There's only a solution for this case, either you accept viking 50/50 losses for exchange the housing or you alone bare all the cost. Whether u accept or not, this is not a dispute case at all. It's just a whining from a small kid like you. |
|
|
Jul 31 2007, 11:14 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,287 posts Joined: Jun 2007 From: Anno Domini Time Ultra: 1,000,000 Trans Am Attack! |
QUOTE(ad_rv4 @ Jul 31 2007, 11:10 AM) You forget the ehtical of buying online products too. And the risk of buying a second hand item.You haven't answer, you do understand the statement I quote above? Added on July 31, 2007, 11:15 am QUOTE(Naka7a @ Jul 31 2007, 11:14 AM) from what i understand... what you are trying to say here is that ts broke the phone himself? then trying to blame viking...? Dude, see back the statement I made.The phone might have cracked before or after. Who knows? This post has been edited by temptation1314: Jul 31 2007, 11:15 AM |
|
|
Jul 31 2007, 11:17 AM
|
|
Moderator
2,083 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Penang |
ad_rv4, you're so unbearably dense and childish. Rocks are more pleasent to talk to.
Get over yourself, get on the PM and nego with vikingw2k on how much who should pay for the case replacement. Because we know this has become a pride issue with you and you can bet your buttom dollar that if that is the case for not resolving this dispute you put up vikingw2k is not likely to get that important 'tag' you want to give him. |
|
|
Jul 31 2007, 11:20 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
478 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Kuantan, PAHANG |
QUOTE(vincent_ng86 @ Jul 31 2007, 11:12 AM) I didn't see where it is not relevant. He is just using a chinese quote, and you shouldn't be saying "bad chinese attitude" right? I recall somewhere you said you are a teacher? yes, i hv my good solution, plz refer first page, thank youSince you are a teacher, please do solve this matter in a nice way and not saying things like that. |
|
|
Jul 31 2007, 11:21 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
7,106 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
You know what? Viking should take the phone back, THEN claim there is an extra scratch appearing in the casing, then reclaim money from buyer.
Let's see how the buyer will say to this then, shall we? Why do people always assume elite member with tag is a perfect being? Them having a tag merely means they have a better reputation, seen here in viking turning up and bothering to explain himself. Not having a tag merely means they can disappear like the other ten, twenty cases we've seen, just underneath this thread too. Stop using the tag as a focus of argument here and focus on the case. This is nothing more than a simple dispute between a buyer and a seller. Hell, I have a couple of dents in my Acer laptop, I'm sooooo suing them. |
|
|
Jul 31 2007, 11:22 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
885 posts Joined: Mar 2006 From: Johor Bahru |
^ sorry, but blame me stupid? WHat is in the first page? Care to explain?
plz refer to first page, plz refer to first page, plz refer to first page, plz refer to first page, plz refer to first page, plz refer to first page, plz refer to first page, damn... now i think i hate getting FIRST Added on July 31, 2007, 11:23 amFuzzy, plz refer to first page, *sacarsm directed to ad_rv4* This post has been edited by zyrl: Jul 31 2007, 11:23 AM |
|
|
Jul 31 2007, 11:24 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,659 posts Joined: Feb 2005 |
|
|
|
Jul 31 2007, 11:24 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
478 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Kuantan, PAHANG |
lets see what admin have to say about this, dont forget to look at my sign, haha..
|
|
|
Jul 31 2007, 11:26 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,287 posts Joined: Jun 2007 From: Anno Domini Time Ultra: 1,000,000 Trans Am Attack! |
QUOTE(fuzzy @ Jul 31 2007, 11:21 AM) You know what? Viking should take the phone back, THEN claim there is an extra scratch appearing in the casing, then reclaim money from buyer. It's better if TS accept the 50/50 losses and viking bank in the money to TS and let TS do the housing change instead of wasting money on courier again. Maybe the next courier, TS will put up a dispute again "LCD broken!!!" which I doubt it was not made by viking or the courier Let's see how the buyer will say to this then, shall we? Why do people always assume elite member with tag is a perfect being? Them having a tag merely means they have a better reputation, seen here in viking turning up and bothering to explain himself. Not having a tag merely means they can disappear like the other ten, twenty cases we've seen, just underneath this thread too. Stop using the tag as a focus of argument here and focus on the case. This is nothing more than a simple dispute between a buyer and a seller. Hell, I have a couple of dents in my Acer laptop, I'm sooooo suing them. QUOTE(zyrl @ Jul 31 2007, 11:22 AM) ^ sorry, but blame me stupid? WHat is in the first page? Care to explain? Nah, I'm just getting frustated by that too. But till now, he hasn't answer my question. Whether he understand the statement I made or not.plz refer to first page, plz refer to first page, plz refer to first page, plz refer to first page, plz refer to first page, plz refer to first page, plz refer to first page, damn... now i think i hate getting FIRST Added on July 31, 2007, 11:23 amFuzzy, plz refer to first page, *sacarsm directed to ad_rv4* |
|
|
Jul 31 2007, 11:26 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
885 posts Joined: Mar 2006 From: Johor Bahru |
damn, i really kesian ur students, man... such a childish TEACHER *if u are a teacher*. to even put up a siggy.
btw remind me not to send my children to your sch, ya? This post has been edited by zyrl: Jul 31 2007, 11:27 AM |
|
|
Jul 31 2007, 11:28 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
322 posts Joined: Dec 2006 From: Bangi |
QUOTE(fuzzy @ Jul 31 2007, 11:21 AM) You know what? Viking should take the phone back, THEN claim there is an extra scratch appearing in the casing, then reclaim money from buyer. i agreed with u.. y dun TS do like dat? Let's see how the buyer will say to this then, shall we? Why do people always assume elite member with tag is a perfect being? Them having a tag merely means they have a better reputation, seen here in viking turning up and bothering to explain himself. Not having a tag merely means they can disappear like the other ten, twenty cases we've seen, just underneath this thread too. Stop using the tag as a focus of argument here and focus on the case. This is nothing more than a simple dispute between a buyer and a seller. Hell, I have a couple of dents in my Acer laptop, I'm sooooo suing them. hurm.. but wut i see here.. most ppl keep bothering about da tag... TE tag.. Elite tag.. but i didnt see any of vikingw2k statement protecting or using his tag as advantages.. |
|
|
Jul 31 2007, 11:29 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
478 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Kuantan, PAHANG |
|
|
|
Jul 31 2007, 11:29 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
472 posts Joined: Dec 2004 From: Penang |
Wow 16 pages and this thread is still going strong. Anyways, TS, I suggest you keep your calm when you reply to other forumers question. They're just trying to help you. I believe splitting 50/50 with viking in repair bill is better than nothing. After all there is no irrefutable proof showing the phone was in bad condition when it was sent out. It could be due to poslaju mishandling.
anyways, good luck.... |
|
|
Jul 31 2007, 11:31 AM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
276 posts Joined: May 2006 From: OUG/MIDVALLEY |
LOL...interesting 17 pages dats why I never buy thigs online just to save afew hundred bucks.
Why is this thread still open? Take the 50/50 deal thats the best solution so far and yes I have read the 1st page...zzzzzzzz |
|
|
Jul 31 2007, 11:32 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
7,106 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
QUOTE(temptation1314 @ Jul 31 2007, 11:26 AM) It's better if TS accept the 50/50 losses and viking bank in the money to TS and let TS do the housing change instead of wasting money on courier again. Maybe the next courier, TS will put up a dispute again "LCD broken!!!" which I doubt it was not made by viking or the courier I suggested it along with many others, apparently he's not down with that. Viking should start a thread on how the buyer is trying to cheat him too, then both can get dispute tag and all of us can be happy.Anyhow, I feel for both parties as they more or less, do have the same right of dispute as the other. |
|
|
Jul 31 2007, 11:33 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,287 posts Joined: Jun 2007 From: Anno Domini Time Ultra: 1,000,000 Trans Am Attack! |
Nah, it's quite strange for a "Teacher" to hover thru forum this time isn't?
Btw, what he want is his money back, maybe to buy other phones?? (bored with phone bought from viking) Anyways, I think he didn't understand the statement made by me. |
|
|
Jul 31 2007, 11:34 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
7,106 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
QUOTE(temptation1314 @ Jul 31 2007, 11:33 AM) Nah, it's quite strange for a "Teacher" to hover thru forum this time isn't? Maybe he's from government school Btw, what he want is his money back, maybe to buy other phones?? (bored with phone bought from viking) Anyways, I think he didn't understand the statement made by me. |
|
|
Jul 31 2007, 11:35 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
885 posts Joined: Mar 2006 From: Johor Bahru |
@temptation1314: cz he never wanted to. he is so adamant on getting the full refunds till he doesnt care about what other ppl is writing. for wat purpose doest he wan the full refund so eagerly? only god knows.
|
|
|
Jul 31 2007, 11:36 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
478 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Kuantan, PAHANG |
thanks for all comments above, i really really appreciate that! nice to see you and give ur comments here..
|
|
|
Jul 31 2007, 11:37 AM
|
|
Moderator
2,083 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Penang |
Read the 1st page http://forum.lowyat.net/topic/267894 oh yeah I forgot that you are a bit 'slow'.
Rules and Regulations 1. The moderators are not here to resolve your disputes, neither are they here to help you out. This subforum is for you to resolve your disputes in an organised and easy to follow manner. 6. Rule No. 1 is the cardinal rule. Make sure you understand it. edit: the right quote from ad_rv4 didnt come out in this post so i just removed it. This was the quote i wanted, "lets see what admin have to say about this, dont forget to look at my sign, haha.." This post has been edited by RangerRed: Jul 31 2007, 11:39 AM |
|
|
Jul 31 2007, 11:41 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
5,417 posts Joined: May 2006 From: Bear Hill, Malacca |
QUOTE(temptation1314 @ Jul 31 2007, 11:35 AM) Nope, now the one I sided is Viking. Why? Because Viking already suggest for 50/50 but TS rejected it and insist of full refund. Why? Maybe because he went for prostitude and don't have enough money to pay and now accuse Viking to refund. i don't really understand what is the need for you guys to say these kind of stuffs. these things doesn't really concern about you guys. it's just a small problem between viking and ts. seriously, why take sides? seems like that actions is a little bit childish too i would say. the best thing is that both of them settle it on their own. i believe they don't need you guy's assumptions and predictions |
|
|
Jul 31 2007, 11:43 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,138 posts Joined: Dec 2006 |
option of settlement made by both parties
1. buyer demand for full refund > seller denied 2. seller offer a 50/50 on housing cost > buyer denied 3. buyer demand a dispute tag to be given to seller. seem a bit harsh ya don't u think TS?? that would be enough right??? may prevent other from being in same situation as u ( trusted a highly rank person |
|
|
Jul 31 2007, 11:47 AM
|
|
Elite
1,928 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: i miss goatse :( |
all i have to say is this:
act like a moron, expect to get treated like one. |
|
|
Jul 31 2007, 11:49 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
885 posts Joined: Mar 2006 From: Johor Bahru |
Why should vikingw2k be punished for something he is not wrong? are u stating that IF vikingw2k were to striped off his TE or ELITE and add in DISPUTE, TS is going to let this matter slide?
If this is the case, then the conclusion i can make is that TS is jealous of vikingw2k and trying ways to striped off his. |
|
|
Jul 31 2007, 11:50 AM
|
|
Staff
72,930 posts Joined: Sep 2005 From: KUL |
QUOTE(temptation1314 @ Jul 31 2007, 11:35 AM) Nope, now the one I sided is Viking. Why? Because Viking already suggest for 50/50 but TS rejected it and insist of full refund. Why? Maybe because he went for prostitude and don't have enough money to pay and now accuse Viking to refund. This is too much to bash the TS. Hello?! Can you have a little respect on others?I've been following this thread since the first post. And, please brush up your English first before bashing up. Can't even get those words spelled correctly. And, what is the purpose of questioning his profession as a teacher? Is there any relation with this case? Stop spamming then. |
|
|
Jul 31 2007, 12:07 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,287 posts Joined: Jun 2007 From: Anno Domini Time Ultra: 1,000,000 Trans Am Attack! |
QUOTE(RangerRed @ Jul 31 2007, 11:37 AM) Read the 1st page http://forum.lowyat.net/topic/267894 oh yeah I forgot that you are a bit 'slow'. Lol, RangerRed, it's Rule no.7 ler =.=""Rules and Regulations 1. The moderators are not here to resolve your disputes, neither are they here to help you out. This subforum is for you to resolve your disputes in an organised and easy to follow manner. 6. Rule No. 1 is the cardinal rule. Make sure you understand it. edit: the right quote from ad_rv4 didnt come out in this post so i just removed it. This was the quote i wanted, "lets see what admin have to say about this, dont forget to look at my sign, haha.." Btw, I think he will not understand one as he will still insist ppl to "refer first page" |
|
|
Jul 31 2007, 12:11 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,138 posts Joined: Dec 2006 |
QUOTE(zyrl @ Jul 31 2007, 11:49 AM) Why should vikingw2k be punished for something he is not wrong? are u stating that IF vikingw2k were to striped off his TE or ELITE and add in DISPUTE, TS is going to let this matter slide? wow bro!! cool down ya~??...seem just u overeact don't u like TS lol~ If this is the case, then the conclusion i can make is that TS is jealous of vikingw2k and trying ways to striped off his. |
|
|
Jul 31 2007, 12:13 PM
|
![]()
Junior Member
32 posts Joined: Apr 2006 From: Malaysia |
all the people's who are supporting the seller are real XXckers....i will say that. i m trying my best to help the buyer, but the entire community is in the way of protecting the seller..wht to do man ?
THE BUYER IS ENTITLED FOR FULL REFUND... |
|
|
Jul 31 2007, 12:15 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
347 posts Joined: Oct 2004 |
guys;
I have my own opinion, take it if you want to hear, otherwise, just leave it ok. Here is the points. If i'm a "good" seller, i will ensure my sell item is in good condition before i sell it. The way i do is just; 1) Give personal warranty like 1 day or 1 week, depends on item, so that the buyer can check my claimed. After that, it's no more my responsibility. 2) Provide the pictures in a best way as possible, so that buyer can know that the item i sell is in the claimed condition. If we do this, i don't think the buyer will have an issues. If i'm a buyer for the item; 1) I will inform the seller about the item has arrived, so that seller can start counting the warranty period. 2) I will check the item function and condition as well during the warranty period. I understand that there is a risk of buying online item and also 2nd hand items, but for me, i support online selling, cause it gives me better value for my money. Normally, if i gives my warranty, i will do this; 1) 1 week warranty if the item was in 100% function. Normally, we are not afraid to give this if we know the item is functioning. 2) 1 day warranty only if the item is less than 90% function, because i know, the item will give more problem later, as well as i don't want the buyer to do unnecessary claim later. That's how i do business. What i want to stress here is that we as a seller should provide more confidence to the buyer that buy our item. If the buyer make claim on the condition of the item after purchased, i will only agree if the claim is during the 1st day of the warranty, cause condition is the 1st part that the buyer will notice when they receive the item. That's all guys. I support online selling, and i would like to see better way being implemented to help buyer outside there. Cheers. |
|
|
Jul 31 2007, 12:26 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
885 posts Joined: Mar 2006 From: Johor Bahru |
QUOTE(budakdegilz @ Jul 31 2007, 12:11 PM) wow bro!! cool down ya~??...seem just u overeact don't u like TS lol~ well, since u wan to say about professional ethics, which part does TS shows that he has professional ethics? instead of solving the issue, all he is saying is HE DEMANDS A FULL REFUND. PLZ REFER TO FIRST PAGE. Is that professional ethics? he is looking at this case based on his opinion only. he doesnt care about the seller also. what he is doing is just for his benefits.Special tag is given because of their contribution to the forum. He earn it not because of this trading in Garage Sale but his contribution towards the good of the forum. So do you still think that he should be striped off his ELITE or TE? Oh ya, i never intend to stoop as low as TS. If my post make u misunderstand anything, then i will say sorry first. |
|
|
Jul 31 2007, 12:54 PM
|
|
Admin
1,806 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Captain's Cabin, Black Pearl |
the next smart comment on this thread unless its from
1. the buyer 2. the seller or is 3. constructive in nature to help solve the dispute will result in an immediate suspension of your account. Buyer/Seller, please try to come to an amicable solution to between yourselves, otherwise this case will be sent to arbitration and both seller and buyer will be given a dispute tag pending a decision. Case so far : Buyer - you are making life difficult by not trying to settle the dispute, but merely trying to get the seller blacklisted. While you may succeed in this, you will also receive a dispute tag for failing to settle a dispute. Second hand items are second hand items, and sometimes things like this do happen. A little bit of compromise would be in order in the spirit of the community. You might have been deceived, but you're not willing to compromise to reach a win win situation. Maybe you should just stick to retail purchases in the future to avoid this problems. Seller - your position as a TE and an elite member would require you to maintain a high level of ethics when dealing with members and from the evidence so far, it would seem you have failed to be transparent in your sales. While this would be normal business practice by sellers in general, the fact that you're a trade enforcer/elite member would mislead members to believe you were above these tactics (and hence make them more likely to purchase from you than a normal member). Your reputation as well as your position has come under question all for a mere PDA phone and your unwillingness to compromise and come to a speedy solution might cause you more harm than you bargained for. Dispute tags will be handed out within the next 24 hours if an amicable solution isn't reached. |
|
|
Jul 31 2007, 01:44 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
478 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Kuantan, PAHANG |
thanks mod, i would like to ask seller for full refund, this may not happen if seller transparent of what he is selling, telling the truth is more important, i dont get mad if u admit ur doing wrong, realize ur mistake is the first priority, of course we need one bad example to tell the others for not to be like him, it is the way i teach my pupils same as in here..i still give him a chance, take back ur PDA and sell it in proper ethical way of selling....sorry for my bad english
|
|
|
Jul 31 2007, 01:56 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,158 posts Joined: Apr 2005 From: -Butterworth, Penang- |
from my point of view,
as viking has been a good and honest seller even earn to be TE, should you ruin your reputation because of this. as a seller have ever heard of "customer alway right"? if you are a buyer, what happen to your product which you buy 1 days and spoil...what will you do..i sure u will request for exchange right...did you wait for claiming which take up a weeks or more...it just like the buyer.. probably if refund you might hard to sell in this forum due to every1 has know this PDA condition. but what can you do, ur picture is hiding the fact ( real or not who know) i remember my case, i got 1 buyer claim my product is dmg...but the product only reach to my hand after 1 week...and i even refund to him even i never know what he did to my product in a week before reach my hand...maybe before that is ok but after few day onli dmg then claim from me...what to do...cos i still need this forum to sell my stuff...i need a good reputation..for me reputation is more important than u defend your case and deny it...what other will think on you in future...how u going to sell ur thing which you claim 95%...will ppl still believe in you..do they still have faith in you.... to those who read this tread..i think you all as buyer alway say this to your seller also "WE CUSTOMER ALWAY RIGHT" (p/s: viking dont tell me that you cannot survive because of RM1.2K) |
|
|
Jul 31 2007, 02:59 PM
|
|
VIP
9,778 posts Joined: Jun 2005 From: KL(Wangsa Maju) , Seremban 2 |
QUOTE(ad_rv4 @ Jul 31 2007, 01:44 PM) thanks mod, i would like to ask seller for full refund, I've proposed earlier on, to send the phone to replace a brand new original casing from Authorized Asus Service Centre (so that the warranty is still valid) and both of us share the cost by 50/50 and stop pointing each other about the extra damage on the pdaphone. I've come up with my evidence to show that the item is in good condition before I sent it out and you claimed that you have some witnesses when you open the parcel. I wouldn't want to accuse whether you are making it up or not. I just wanted to solve this dispute asap as dragging further won't do you any good, might as well settle it asap instead of keeping the damaged phone for quite some time. QUOTE(ad_rv4 @ Jul 31 2007, 01:44 PM) this may not happen if seller transparent of what he is selling, telling the truth is more important, i dont get mad if u admit ur doing wrong, realize ur mistake is the first priority, of course we need one bad example to tell the others for not to be like him, it is the way i teach my pupils same as in here..i still give him a chance, take back ur PDA and sell it in proper ethical way of selling....sorry for my bad english I wondered did you really go through everything I've posted or you just opt to shoot me blindly? To you and to those who are still asking me the same old question and accuse me of hiding the condition, I said that, when i got the phone back. They were some minor scratches on the top, side(the buttons) and a few more slight ones around.That's the reason i claim my phone is 95% when i posted my thread. If they is a big damage on the top like what the TS picture showed, don't you think I'm a bit silly for posting it at 95% and let my buyers COD with me so that they can call off the deal when they see they big damage on the top? forummer leeyuleong has came earlier before TS has sealed his deal with me. He (leeyuleong) offered me a higher and better price for my phone via sms and arranged a meet up. He came all the way from Cheras stating that he wanted to look at the condition first. Once he reached my place, we have a small chat and he start looking at the minor tear and wear on my phone. but in the end he still call off the deal cause the main thing that caught his eyes was just the minor tear and wear on the left side button. He's buying the phone for his friend and he afraid that his friend wouldn't like it hence he called off the deal politely before going back and i thank him for coming all the way to view it. All the while the phone is in 95% condition, which means the top part was just some minor scratches due to the drop by the previous seller(fullbl4d3 too claimed that it was just a minor scratches) and there are some minor tear and wear on maybe the edges. Right after I saw the picture uploaded by you, of course I was stunned as I myself don't recall any bad damage like that before. Well, I decided to take some time to investigate this matter with the previous people who seen it before I've sent the phone to you which is why I didn't reply much (because IF all the person who've seen the phone said that they too saw that there's a big damage on the top, I would have admit it was my fault and just full refund you for misleading you. BUT IF all the person DENIED that they've seen that damage, then I will have explain in this thread just like what I did few days after that). Also I didn't accuse you blindly for making that damage when you first uploaded the picture and please I too hope that you can be more rational by not simply accusing me of doing that too. I've done my part to show that I'm clean. You too. I've never question your witnesses and just accept it as neither You or Me can proof that who is right and wrong. As a seller, I will give you the benefit of doubt and just accept your claim which is why I proposed to have the casing replaced with a New Original one which actually solve this whole mess. (instead of blaming whose fault it is and making thread an endless novel in the end). After all this thread is created because of your dissatisfaction on the housing. So why don't we just peacefully solve the root of this problem instead of creating a normal forummer VS TE war, or start another Racist Thread, or Mods Are Always Right kinda thread here? YES, I wouldn't mind it too if I've to fork out 100% of the phone casing replacement cost which I doubt many others will. Take a survey of replacing a New Original pda phone casing cost outside. They gonna cost you a bomb. Take for example Dopod phones casing replacement would simply cost you at least RM3xx and some might be more expensive. stevenlee - enough, your scenario is entirely different from mine, also we are discussing on my issue. Don't relate this to other issue. We don't need to know how This post has been edited by vikingw2k: Jul 31 2007, 03:13 PM |
|
|
Jul 31 2007, 03:41 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,158 posts Joined: Apr 2005 From: -Butterworth, Penang- |
QUOTE stevenlee - enough, your scenario is entirely different from mine, also we are discussing on my issue. Don't relate this to other issue. We don't need to know how since you i am a dumb seller cos i hold the principle of "Buyer Alway Right" i think most of business man also DUMB cos their principle when dealing with customer. I will never go to a shop which say Seller Alway Right and bully customer or consumer especially your shop... Since so many ppl already voice out their dissatisfaction and you cant accept it , it is no use we continue giving you advise... i will end my opinion here add see what will you did and what admin will take action if this case is not settle... MOD - sorry if i spam this tread This post has been edited by stevenlee: Jul 31 2007, 03:48 PM |
|
|
Jul 31 2007, 04:14 PM
|
|
VIP
9,778 posts Joined: Jun 2005 From: KL(Wangsa Maju) , Seremban 2 |
Let's not waste more time, let me emphasize my proposal to you again.
- You send the phone back to me(you bear the postage of course, you don't claim a company for your petrol charges when returning their products to them right?), - I'll send it to Asus Service Centre to change a new housing, I will check whether they need to replace the whole thing or just the top part. If it's just the top part, I will fork out 100%, if it's the whole casing, I will fork out 50%(as I believe that you too should fork out some money as it involved changing the whole thing and you are only claiming the top part). Either way is benificial to you because If you were to count dead grass, the Top part scratches is 20% since earlier on you said it looks like 80% Like new, So by right I should only pay 20% of the whole housing and You pay 80% of the balance cost, still I'm generous enough to fork out 50% of the cost of changing the entire casing for you when by right I only need to pay the part that you claimed. - I'll pickup the phone myself from Asus Service Centre( I'll bear my own transport cost) - I'll then check the phone, test and make sure everything is ok , upload a few pictures of the top part which they've replaced for you to see clearly the condition of the top part, - and finally You either send your courier to pickup from me or you bear my transportation + postage charges for me to send the item back to you (you don't ask a company to send back your claimed products at their cost don't you think so?) In short, - You only pay the postage tru and fro. - I'll pay the 100% cost of changing the top part, and 50% if it involves changing the whole casing. I guess this proposal is reasonable enough. The reasons supporting this - You've accused me blindly for the damage on the top part . So the root of this problem is the Top part. Changing the housing will remove the cosmetic damage on the Top part. - I too can accuse you to purposely did it and make this a huge mess to claim a Full Refund from me probably you needed the money so badly for other things after you've committed the deal or you found a better offer(but I didn't accused you blindly as I myself don't have evidence to prove it, but remember, neither did you have evidence that I caused that damage cause people might accuse either one of us could just bring in any grandmother or grandfather and claim to have witness the condition before sending out to you and after you've received.) However, I'll leave the benefits of doubt to you. You are claiming the Top part. So I'll just change the top part for you. I don't see any reason for full refund unless I've delivered a completely faulty item to you. stevenlee - Sorry to say that you still failed horribly. Your last post still doesn't contribute on better ways or suggestion on how to solve this matter equally for both TS and I. However I would thank you greatly for the following post you've made. QUOTE(stevenlee @ Jul 31 2007, 03:41 PM) i will end my opinion here Thanks for dropping by.This post has been edited by vikingw2k: Jul 31 2007, 05:45 PM |
|
|
Jul 31 2007, 04:18 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,138 posts Joined: Dec 2006 |
QUOTE(vikingw2k @ Jul 31 2007, 02:59 PM) that's the best solution we're looking *opss..sorry vikingw2k!! quote delete to coz NEW solution offer have been made..pretty good actualy!! This post has been edited by budakdegilz: Jul 31 2007, 04:43 PM |
|
|
Jul 31 2007, 06:47 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,085 posts Joined: Jul 2006 From: Hell |
QUOTE(temptation1314 @ Jul 31 2007, 10:25 AM) ad_rv4, my opinion -Be more common sense lar. It's getting my nerve as you are the one being childish. Does putting extra protection means he did it? Let's try if you send me an LCD, you nicely put everything in box and add some bubles for extra protection. So When I received the LCD, and I feel don't like and and purposely broke the LCD and ask you for refund. Got what I mean Kiddie? There's only a solution for this case, either you accept viking 50/50 losses for exchange the housing or you alone bare all the cost. Whether u accept or not, this is not a dispute case at all. It's just a whining from a small kid like you. where on earth a normal human will damage the things he bought?? susah payah trade then go bank in and wait the postman to come and feel not very 'love' the stuff then can simply damage it lar..it is more childish leh bro...for wat reason a buyer wan to do like tat when the power is on the buyer either to buy or not.. 3cents QUOTE the next smart comment on this thread unless its from 1. the buyer 2. the seller or is 3. constructive in nature to help solve the dispute will result in an immediate suspension of your account. Buyer/Seller, please try to come to an amicable solution to between yourselves, otherwise this case will be sent to arbitration and both seller and buyer will be given a dispute tag pending a decision. Case so far : Buyer - you are making life difficult by not trying to settle the dispute, but merely trying to get the seller blacklisted. While you may succeed in this, you will also receive a dispute tag for failing to settle a dispute. Second hand items are second hand items, and sometimes things like this do happen. A little bit of compromise would be in order in the spirit of the community. You might have been deceived, but you're not willing to compromise to reach a win win situation. Maybe you should just stick to retail purchases in the future to avoid this problems. Seller - your position as a TE and an elite member would require you to maintain a high level of ethics when dealing with members and from the evidence so far, it would seem you have failed to be transparent in your sales. While this would be normal business practice by sellers in general, the fact that you're a trade enforcer/elite member would mislead members to believe you were above these tactics (and hence make them more likely to purchase from you than a normal member). Your reputation as well as your position has come under question all for a mere PDA phone and your unwillingness to compromise and come to a speedy solution might cause you more harm than you bargained for. Dispute tags will be handed out within the next 24 hours if an amicable solution isn't reached. sorry admin but would like to comment about the quote by temptation1314..didnt realise your post..sorry congratz for showing your profesional way in dealing this kind matter viking.. This post has been edited by lolz_5167: Jul 31 2007, 06:54 PM |
|
|
Jul 31 2007, 07:11 PM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
152 posts Joined: Jun 2007 From: Perak |
TS, just accept the solution suggested by viking lar.. do 50/50 deal on new ori housing..
or just suggest viking to provide u a 95% NEW housing on his cost.. as he insist that pda is 95% NEW.. but still, the first solution is the easiest.. why not spend a few more bucks on a 100% NEW housing.. then ur pda will look NEW.. bling bling.. This post has been edited by wandzul: Jul 31 2007, 07:14 PM |
|
|
Jul 31 2007, 07:41 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
478 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Kuantan, PAHANG |
thanks for all the comment, did you all know and realize, he has misleading me to buy his PDA by giving incorrect informations about the conditions, if he show the pictures earlier or inform me bout the scratch for sure i dun buy that unit, ok i juz emphasis on the top part where he deny it, how bout the bottom part and the 'hold' button that fade away??? is this not include in his '95% like new condition'???? i dont accept ur solution bro since u seller misleading buyer like me with ur pictures and words, RM1250 is not a worth buy and oso i need to share with u the cost of changing casing, haha, nice try..
|
|
|
Jul 31 2007, 07:42 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
640 posts Joined: May 2005 From: Sarawak |
vikingw2k.. so far i haven't seen any of your witnesses reply to this thread here, what we see is that they come to this thread and view the photos and sms/pm their comments? hard to convinced us right..
like i say for twice already, its not fair to the buyer as TRADE ENFORCER or SAFE TRADER can just go check 2nd hand phone which got serious CRACKS or SCRATCHES then take a perfect angle of PHOTO stated its in GOOD CONDITIONS 95% NEW, send to the outstation buyer (NOT COD), then buyer complain end up the need to pay for the postage fee for both send/return and split the cost of repairing to 50/50. SELLER probably just buy the phone at a much lower price due to the condition of the phone then after pay for the 50% repair fee, still earning good profit, of cause this is just my scenarios. » Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... « Buyer is asking for refund because he thinks that he's getting cheated. Buyer already asked regarding the scratch/crack part, SELLER knows that the BUYER is from OUTSTATION, he should at least take clear photo of the TOP PART and show the BUYER, not telling the BUYER to refer to the pictures you posted which doesn't show the part. Buyer may probably not going to buy the PDA or ask for bargain when he see those CRACK/SCRATCHES. If SELLER did show the BUYER that the crack/scratches is not that serious, BUYER bought it then and he accidentally drop it, he got nothing to argue anymore. Seller MISTAKE for not answering to the BUYER regarding the 5% bad part where he can take photo and show the buyer (but who knows probably the crack/scratches is there already to be hide) If buyer is a TRADE ENFORCER/SAFE TRADER/MODERATORS, what will happen to the SELLER who just come LYN starting fresh business? Will he get to be treated the same? Can he just need to ask the buyer (with *tags*) to pay the postage fee and 50% of the repair fee? This is the question we need to ask ourselves. Well thats the risk for outstation buyers. Thats why there's a SAFE TRADER tag given for us to trust but in this case you will never know whats going to happen. I know I had no right to advice/suggest the seller as he is an experienced businessman, LYN advices people to practices COD and you mention that there are other buyers also asking for the item, i think seller should consider COD than postage so same things wont happen next time. This post has been edited by ingjoo: Jul 31 2007, 07:54 PM |
|
|
Jul 31 2007, 07:44 PM
|
|
Elite
5,434 posts Joined: Dec 2006 |
then right now,
Seller :Offer him to change the housing,buyer pay the shipping fee and seller will do everything for buyer. Buyer: Rejet the offer and still asking for refund. |
|
|
Jul 31 2007, 08:04 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
478 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Kuantan, PAHANG |
the previous owner already admit he dropped the PDA and got scratch at the top, u need to ask him although the PDA with you at that time, what a ridiculous story u create there..i highlight here again, if u show me the pics and inform me about that scratch, to tell you the truth, ive got no interest of that PDA..you should told me at the first place, won't you?????
|
|
|
Jul 31 2007, 08:08 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,499 posts Joined: Apr 2005 From: Tyneside |
QUOTE(selvalives @ Jul 31 2007, 10:48 AM) AS I KNOW ALREADY, THE COMMUNITY HERE IS TRYING TO COVER UP A CHEATING CASE. READ FROM THE FIRST PAGE, U WILL KNOW. THAT IS WHAT I CAN SAY Dude,I'll guess that you never seen or met Viking2w personally Don't JUDGE a BOOK by it's COVER..can you see his successful trading lists?? How much?? And only this time maybe he made a mistake..don't ever CALL people a CHEATER unless he's proven GUILTY!.. I've met him and talk to him and he seems to be a very nice seller...how can you expect to get a 2nd HP without any WEAR and TEAR! Now he's willing to share the cost of replacing the HP casing with the buyer..where else you can get a better deal than that?? Im asking you now.. Next time if in doubt of the products quality that you bought online then do COD! If can't do COD then don't do any online DEAL @ all So if i were the buyer, i would like to take up Viking's offer and SHUT THE HELL UP! |
|
|
Jul 31 2007, 08:09 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
478 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Kuantan, PAHANG |
u refund my money, take back ur PDA and change to new casing, sell it at higher price also can wat???u got 120% profit and i got 0%.. its isn't fair but i can accept
|
|
|
Jul 31 2007, 08:39 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
885 posts Joined: Mar 2006 From: Johor Bahru |
QUOTE(ad_rv4 @ Jul 31 2007, 08:04 PM) the previous owner already admit he dropped the PDA and got scratch at the top, u need to ask him although the PDA with you at that time, what a ridiculous story u create there..i highlight here again, if u show me the pics and inform me about that scratch, to tell you the truth, ive got no interest of that PDA..you should told me at the first place, won't you????? as you said here. u saw the scratch > u become not interested. therefore viking change the casing for u > technically u should be interested back, no? clearly u just wanted a full refund no matter the discussion. for wat reason u so adamant for a full refund, no one knows. |
|
|
Jul 31 2007, 08:43 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
359 posts Joined: Mar 2006 From: Kuala Lumpur |
QUOTE(zyrl @ Jul 31 2007, 08:39 PM) as you said here. Which means viking has to change the casing and cover any costs involved.u saw the scratch > u become not interested. therefore viking change the casing for u > technically u should be interested back, no? clearly u just wanted a full refund no matter the discussion. for wat reason u so adamant for a full refund, no one knows. |
|
|
Jul 31 2007, 08:43 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
478 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Kuantan, PAHANG |
QUOTE(zyrl @ Jul 31 2007, 08:39 PM) as you said here. yes, i saw the scratch > i become not interested > coz i been cheatedu saw the scratch > u become not interested. therefore viking change the casing for u > technically u should be interested back, no? clearly u just wanted a full refund no matter the discussion. for wat reason u so adamant for a full refund, no one knows. |
|
|
Jul 31 2007, 08:49 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
885 posts Joined: Mar 2006 From: Johor Bahru |
well, i think full refund doesnt cover whether u still interested on the item or not
|
|
|
Jul 31 2007, 08:53 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
478 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Kuantan, PAHANG |
|
|
|
Jul 31 2007, 09:13 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
640 posts Joined: May 2005 From: Sarawak |
» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... « hmm... try to read what i say guys.. buyer request refund is not possible as the seller rejected and there's no faulty found but just the crack/scratches is not shown to the buyer at the first place so the buyer feels he's got cheated. If i'm the buyer i feel so too because seller seems like hiding. seller can accuse buyer did the crack/scratches himself for some reason to get refund, but IF SELLER did take photo and show to the buyer, what can the buyer got in his hand to ask for refund? partly also seller mistake. Solution from both side.. Buyer = he send back the PDA back to SELLER and get FULL REFUND <--rejected by seller Seller = send the PDA to Asus services centre to change casing <-- so far this is acceptable IF seller pay the postage and repair cost i know it wont be fair for seller, but please think of the buyer, ->> If there's really a crack/scratches at first, seller inform buyer, buyer wont even buy it, this all wont happen. Buyer asking for the crack/scratches part but seller dint take the photo. Dont talk about what you normal do like taking different angle photos. BUYER asking for the CRACK/SCRATCHES PART ok. ->> If the crack/scratches is done by the buyer, then its also seller mistake for not taking the photos at first. Hard to say whose right whose wrong as both can say they got witnesses. |
|
|
Jul 31 2007, 09:13 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
432 posts Joined: Sep 2006 |
|
|
|
Jul 31 2007, 09:36 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,625 posts Joined: Dec 2005 |
BTW, in my opinion asking for a full refund is quite illogical. Assuming you buy a PDA from shop & the shop fella knows the PDA got problem but still sells to you (ASSUMING ONLY!!!). You bought the PDA already but once you go back & try, there's some problem. Will the seller refund back your money because you had problem with the PDA? NO! Most probably he will ask you to leave the PDA for repair & come after 2-3 days. (& less probably he will ignore you or bash you up or say the company that gives warranty closed down, not anything else like refunding)
I understand that you felt cheated coz of this but nothing is perfect my friend. Yes, Im putting myself in your shoes & trying to think rationally rather than asking for full refund which will not benefit both side. To have a win-win situation between you & seller, you may replace the casing. Maybe you can contribute lower, e.g 30-70, 20-80 etc. Again, asking for full refund will not help you. It's only going to trouble yourself as you aren't gaining anything other than a dispute tag. Next time please always do COD as it can give you more satisfaction. Online transaction is not recommended if you want to be safe with your money & things you receive. Added on July 31, 2007, 9:37 pmSorry if my post can cause any misunderstanding or dissatisfaction This post has been edited by ViRaViRa: Jul 31 2007, 09:38 PM |
|
|
Jul 31 2007, 09:39 PM
|
|
VIP
9,778 posts Joined: Jun 2005 From: KL(Wangsa Maju) , Seremban 2 |
QUOTE(ad_rv4 @ Jul 31 2007, 07:41 PM) thanks for all the comment, did you all know and realize, he has misleading me to buy his PDA by giving incorrect informations about the conditions, About the pictures, read and understand this this again and againQUOTE(ad_rv4 @ Jul 31 2007, 07:41 PM) if he show the pictures earlier or inform me bout the scratch for sure i dun buy that unit, ok i juz emphasis on the top part where he deny it, If you have requested me to send you more photos specifically on the scratches I would have sent it to you. Now don't blame what had happened. Just move on to the solution will you?QUOTE(ad_rv4 @ Jul 31 2007, 07:41 PM) how bout the bottom part and the 'hold' button that fade away??? is this not include in his '95% like new condition'???? i dont accept ur solution bro since u seller misleading buyer like me with ur pictures and words, RM1250 is not a worth buy and oso i need to share with u the cost of changing casing, haha, nice try.. If you are blaming the hold button on the left which is a bit faded, I've already showed it in my clearly picture. I don't see why i should be blamed. It's like you accepted it earlier on and now you start to blame the "Hold button"Please, before you accuse me of misleading you, could you show me the proof? QUOTE(ad_rv4 @ Jul 31 2007, 08:09 PM) u refund my money, take back ur PDA and change to new casing, sell it at higher price also can wat???u got 120% profit and i got 0%.. its isn't fair but i can accept QUOTE(ad_rv4 @ Jul 31 2007, 08:43 PM) If it's that easy, why not - you saw the scratch > you became not interested and simply accuse me > I accept your claim and change the housing for you instead of pointing fingers > you accept it peacefully. You are making yourself sounded as if you have lost interest in that phone and wanted back your cash so badly probably you got bored of it and wanted to buy other stuff or found better deal elsewhere. If you are genuine in solving this matter I don't see why you would reject my offer which is change the Top part for you and me bearing 100% of the cost, this already benefit you. Imagine, buy a used phone, and suddenly got extra damage, blame and accuse the seller blindly, seller generously just replace the casing for you FOC when you yourself could be suspected for the damage. QUOTE(ingjoo @ Jul 31 2007, 09:13 PM) If the crack/scratches is done by the buyer, then its also seller mistake for not taking the photos at first. Obviously this statement doesn't sounds right at all. You are just thinking of the buyer's side. Not as a neutral side. I would say, just leave this thread as you are not contributing anything to the resolution but inviting flames. ThanksThis post has been edited by vikingw2k: Jul 31 2007, 09:47 PM |
|
|
Jul 31 2007, 09:42 PM
|
|
Elite
5,154 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
QUOTE(zyrl @ Jul 31 2007, 08:39 PM) as you said here. I think the bold sentence should NOT be overlooked.u saw the scratch > u become not interested. therefore viking change the casing for u > technically u should be interested back, no? clearly u just wanted a full refund no matter the discussion. for wat reason u so adamant for a full refund, no one knows. What is the problem with the buyer? AFAIK, he has been complaining about the CASING, nothing to do with the functionality of the phone. Now that the seller agrees to pay 100% for the replacement of the scratched/damaged part and 50% of a new casing. Basically, it should has solved the CASING problem. Yet, the buyer doesn't agree on it. Although I am not a seller, I think the seller is offering the best option he can. This post has been edited by kimhoong: Jul 31 2007, 09:43 PM |
|
|
Jul 31 2007, 09:46 PM
|
![]()
Junior Member
32 posts Joined: Apr 2006 From: Malaysia |
QUOTE(Notoriez @ Jul 31 2007, 08:08 PM) Dude, hello dude, i m not blamming people just like that, it is after some observation. I really believe that, the buyer has all the rights to ask for full refund if he founds that the item that he received is not match with the item posted in the sale. In our case, the hard sctrach was not highlighted even the seller has asked wht is the 5% scratch. THIS IS MY ONLY CONCERN. Frankly telling , i have no idea who is this VIKING and i don't have any personal problem with him to flame this thread. JUST NOT SATISFIED WHEN SAW THE CASE MISLEADING FROM THE TRUTH.I'll guess that you never seen or met Viking2w personally Don't JUDGE a BOOK by it's COVER..can you see his successful trading lists?? How much?? And only this time maybe he made a mistake..don't ever CALL people a CHEATER unless he's proven GUILTY!.. I've met him and talk to him and he seems to be a very nice seller...how can you expect to get a 2nd HP without any WEAR and TEAR! Now he's willing to share the cost of replacing the HP casing with the buyer..where else you can get a better deal than that?? Im asking you now.. Next time if in doubt of the products quality that you bought online then do COD! If can't do COD then don't do any online DEAL @ all So if i were the buyer, i would like to take up Viking's offer and SHUT THE HELL UP! |
|
|
Jul 31 2007, 09:48 PM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
152 posts Joined: Jun 2007 From: Perak |
well the only i could say is viking's sale thread is very deceiving since there's no defect visible unless the chrome button (that made it 95% NEW eh?).. so in laymen terms is CHEATING.. what say u?
me also could have been deceived by the pics as the pda looks 'very new'.. do u all expect a buyer would do photoshop to detect any defects? as for the full refund requested by TS, honestly i would do the same as TS (asking for full refund) since i felt like being cheated.. and i dont want to keep items i bought resulting from cheated deals.. the pda has been dropped and the housing cracked and scratched badly whereas it hasn't been mentioned by seller eventhough i already asked about it.. the pda could fail anytime.. and yes for sure i dont want a dropped, badly scratched and cracked pda since i paid ONLY for 95% NEW pda.. so i want full refund.. i guess TS felt the same thing as i described.. isnt it TS? personally, based on ethics and responsibility, full refund should have been made.. but since the seller is a TE.. there's not much i can say.. this is his 'home'.. he's someone and i'm no one.. good luck to u TS.. This post has been edited by wandzul: Jul 31 2007, 09:53 PM |
|
|
Jul 31 2007, 09:50 PM
|
|
VIP
9,778 posts Joined: Jun 2005 From: KL(Wangsa Maju) , Seremban 2 |
QUOTE(selvalives @ Jul 31 2007, 09:46 PM) bla bla bla ..... You, read this again and again. p/s: I'm just tired of repeating the issue on the scratched part again. Cant you guys spend more time to read all the post, understand them before making any comments here? |
|
|
Jul 31 2007, 09:53 PM
|
|
VIP
9,778 posts Joined: Jun 2005 From: KL(Wangsa Maju) , Seremban 2 |
QUOTE(wandzul @ Jul 31 2007, 09:48 PM) the pda has been dropped and the housing cracked and scratched badly whereas it has been mentioned by seller eventhough i already asked about it.. the pda could fail anytime.. No, You are wrong. The phone was slightly scratched on the top during that drop. That drop is not the cause for the bad damage in his picture. Please get your facts right.This post has been edited by vikingw2k: Jul 31 2007, 09:54 PM |
|
|
Jul 31 2007, 10:05 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
478 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Kuantan, PAHANG |
if u can't refund me, here i would like to request to ADMIN, to put out ur tag as 'ELITE MEMBER' and 'TRADE ENFORCER' because of misleading buyer with your pictures and words..
|
|
|
Jul 31 2007, 10:10 PM
|
|
VIP
9,778 posts Joined: Jun 2005 From: KL(Wangsa Maju) , Seremban 2 |
QUOTE(ad_rv4 @ Jul 31 2007, 10:05 PM) if u can't refund me, here i would like to request to ADMIN, to put out ur tag as 'ELITE MEMBER' and 'TRADE ENFORCER' because of misleading buyer with your pictures and words.. Obviously you sounded more like you are trying hard towards bringing my tag down rather then solving this dispute in an adult manner. |
|
|
Jul 31 2007, 10:19 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
478 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Kuantan, PAHANG |
QUOTE(vikingw2k @ Jul 31 2007, 10:10 PM) Obviously you sounded more like you are trying hard towards bringing my tag down rather then solving this dispute in an adult manner. i've done this for the sake of the forum, to make a better place to trades and also this is the 'lesson' for you for not to be a cheater@mislead buyer, dont forget it till ya die.. |
|
|
Jul 31 2007, 10:20 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,625 posts Joined: Dec 2005 |
QUOTE(ad_rv4 @ Jul 31 2007, 10:05 PM) if u can't refund me, here i would like to request to ADMIN, to put out ur tag as 'ELITE MEMBER' and 'TRADE ENFORCER' because of misleading buyer with your pictures and words.. Ow, that's threatening dude. People are watching your "true colour". Either change the casing as it's the only way which can satisfy both. If you wana refund, then so sorry my friend. It sounds 'illogical' in real world. |
|
|
Jul 31 2007, 10:25 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,081 posts Joined: Aug 2005 |
QUOTE(kimhoong @ Jul 31 2007, 09:42 PM) I think the bold sentence should NOT be overlooked. p/s: sorry, i dun read whole of d post... but i do agree wit this...What is the problem with the buyer? AFAIK, he has been complaining about the CASING, nothing to do with the functionality of the phone. Now that the seller agrees to pay 100% for the replacement of the scratched/damaged part and 50% of a new casing. Basically, it should has solved the CASING problem. Yet, the buyer doesn't agree on it. Although I am not a seller, I think the seller is offering the best option he can. mayb d TS dun like its functionality or got bored d... |
|
|
Jul 31 2007, 10:29 PM
|
|
VIP
9,778 posts Joined: Jun 2005 From: KL(Wangsa Maju) , Seremban 2 |
QUOTE(ad_rv4 @ Jul 31 2007, 10:19 PM) i've done this for the sake of the forum, to make a better place to trades and also this is the 'lesson' for you for not to be a cheater@mislead buyer, dont forget it till ya die.. Now I knew your intention of creating this thread. You sounded as if you've no intention to solve this dispute and you are here trying your very best to bring down my tag. QUOTE(selvalives @ Jul 31 2007, 10:26 PM) Do not simply accuse that I'm wrong when you don't have any facts to show. You are trying to mess this up instead of suggesting fair solutions. |
|
|
Jul 31 2007, 10:32 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,158 posts Joined: Apr 2005 From: -Butterworth, Penang- |
QUOTE(ingjoo @ Jul 31 2007, 07:42 PM) vikingw2k.. so far i haven't seen any of your witnesses reply to this thread here, what we see is that they come to this thread and view the photos and sms/pm their comments? hard to convinced us right.. this is what i have been looking for..i tot i not been following the tread closely or i miss out the witness statement ...now i got partner....there is still no witness can prove there is no scratch which mention by viking this is 4th day and still no witness.....QUOTE(Notoriez @ Jul 31 2007, 08:08 PM) Dude, bro, u ask ppl dun judge the book by its cover but ur statement "can you see his succefull trading list" already say u judge ppl by its cover...with long trading list can mean what????? I'll guess that you never seen or met Viking2w personally Don't JUDGE a BOOK by it's COVER..can you see his successful trading lists?? How much?? And only this time maybe he made a mistake..don't ever CALL people a CHEATER unless he's proven GUILTY!.. I've met him and talk to him and he seems to be a very nice seller...how can you expect to get a 2nd HP without any WEAR and TEAR! Now he's willing to share the cost of replacing the HP casing with the buyer..where else you can get a better deal than that?? Im asking you now.. Next time if in doubt of the products quality that you bought online then do COD! If can't do COD then don't do any online DEAL @ all So if i were the buyer, i would like to take up Viking's offer and SHUT THE HELL UP! how u feel if u being cheated???what if this happen to u??? what to do with successful trade list??? will u think that ur pda will function normally as is has been drop before???u also scare it may malfunction in few month and u have to waste ur effort and time to send back for repairing.... sharing the cost is not a good idea as some1 has been cheat and now has to fork some money to repair...is that fair??? ..if the seller bare all the cost then is still considerable ok..... |
|
|
Jul 31 2007, 10:35 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
478 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Kuantan, PAHANG |
QUOTE(vikingw2k @ Jul 31 2007, 10:29 PM) Now I knew your intention of creating this thread. You sounded as if you've no intention to solve this dispute and you are here trying your very best to bring down my tag. you r trying to create an issue here, u already know from the start that ur the real cheater..RIGHT FROM THE START!!!Do not simply accuse that I'm wrong when you don't have any facts to show. You are trying to mess this up instead of suggesting fair solutions. |
|
|
Jul 31 2007, 10:35 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,625 posts Joined: Dec 2005 |
QUOTE(selvalives @ Jul 31 2007, 10:26 PM) WHY THE BUYER NEED TO SATISFY THE SELLER IF THE SELLER DID SOMETHING WRONG ? Yes, im asking you the same question. I don't understand because I NEVER SAID BUYER NEED TO SATISFY SELLER, did I?Added on July 31, 2007, 10:28 pm another misleading comment. i have no idea how some of these "senior members" can comment like this . What I meant was buyer & seller satisfy themselves, not each other. It's a win-win situation where buyer feel satisfied with the product (unless wana behave 'childish' demanding for full refund) & seller also feel satisfied with the given solution (which is to change the casing) Anyway, I back out as I see no point if both parties & some external parties keep on saying the same thing without looking for a solution. Viking & ad_rv4, hopefully you guys can solve it peacefully... C ya This post has been edited by ViRaViRa: Jul 31 2007, 10:38 PM |
|
|
Jul 31 2007, 10:37 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,081 posts Joined: Aug 2005 |
QUOTE(selvalives @ Jul 31 2007, 10:26 PM) WHY THE BUYER NEED TO SATISFY THE SELLER IF THE SELLER DID SOMETHING WRONG ? y missleading??? Added on July 31, 2007, 10:28 pm another misleading comment. i have no idea how some of these "senior members" can comment like this . i thnk better list down d 1) problem 2)solution n y all people r posting like samething over and over again.... |
|
|
Jul 31 2007, 10:40 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,158 posts Joined: Apr 2005 From: -Butterworth, Penang- |
QUOTE(ViRaViRa @ Jul 31 2007, 10:35 PM) Yes, im asking you the same question. I don't understand because I NEVER SAID BUYER NEED TO SATISFY SELLER, did I? u got your point there...but once u been cheated....u think u will tolerate???i think u will bang that shop and spaming in lowyat condeming that shop bla bla bla....What I meant was buyer & seller satisfy themselves, not each other. It's a win-win situation where buyer feel satisfied with the product (unless wana behave 'childish' demanding for full refund) & seller also feel satisfied with the given solution (which is to change the casing) |
|
|
Jul 31 2007, 10:51 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,625 posts Joined: Dec 2005 |
QUOTE(stevenlee @ Jul 31 2007, 10:40 PM) u got your point there...but once u been cheated....u think u will tolerate???i think u will bang that shop and spaming in lowyat condeming that shop bla bla bla.... Yes, Mr. stevenlee. I admit I WAS. But now I don't think it's a good solution as it doesn't bring any benefit to myself. Of course I will be angry. But what is going to happen if I just rant & ask for a refund for that? Let's think practically, imagine those big companies etc like Dell, Nokia etc. When you have a faulty unit received from them & you take back to them, will they refund your money? NO! There's no point to argue & argue without coming for a solution. Time is precious, so just get it done fast & go ahead. » Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... « |
|
|
Jul 31 2007, 10:55 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,285 posts Joined: Mar 2007 |
QUOTE(stevenlee @ Jul 31 2007, 10:32 PM) this is what i have been looking for..i tot i not been following the tread closely or i miss out the witness statement ...now i got partner....there is still no witness can prove there is no scratch which mention by viking this is 4th day and still no witness..... with the bolded words..lets say when u trying to buy a 2nd hand item..mobile phone...pcs..blabla anything..would u expect the seller tell u how many times it dropped b4? or give u the list which record down all the frequency by how many times the item dropped..repair...etc..? when u buy the 2nd hand items, u will expect it could not last longer rite? if u wan it function properly jus go and get a new 1 with warranty correct? and i dun think seller got such a free time to telling u all these and list down all those rubbish...somemore now the problem is not bcoz of the pda dropped b4..is bcoz the picture posted by seller do not match wat the buyer expected in mind when he received the itembro, u ask ppl dun judge the book by its cover but ur statement "can you see his succefull trading list" already say u judge ppl by its cover...with long trading list can mean what????? how u feel if u being cheated???what if this happen to u??? what to do with successful trade list??? will u think that ur pda will function normally as is has been drop before???u also scare it may malfunction in few month and u have to waste ur effort and time to send back for repairing.... sharing the cost is not a good idea as some1 has been cheat and now has to fork some money to repair...is that fair??? ..if the seller bare all the cost then is still considerable ok..... and the seller agreed to pay 100% of loses..pls read the previous pages man...jus the TS dun wan to accept the offer.. This post has been edited by sam0919: Jul 31 2007, 11:11 PM |
|
|
Jul 31 2007, 11:05 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,158 posts Joined: Apr 2005 From: -Butterworth, Penang- |
QUOTE(ViRaViRa @ Jul 31 2007, 10:51 PM) Yes, Mr. stevenlee. I admit I WAS. But now I don't think it's a good solution as it doesn't bring any benefit to myself. Of course I will be angry. But what is going to happen if I just rant & ask for a refund for that? bro, the statement u use above is quite dangerous...what if all the lyn-er practice what u say selling faulty unit will not refund as like dell and nokia?we can say the item is in good condition before post out just like Dell did..but reach buyer is faulty so no refund but we actually send out faulty unit... is that fine with u?Let's think practically, imagine those big companies etc like Dell, Nokia etc. When you have a faulty unit received from them & you take back to them, will they refund your money? NO! There's no point to argue & argue without coming for a solution. Time is precious, so just get it done fast & go ahead. » Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... « yup Dell and Nokia wont refund you..but at least they bear all the cost and might appologize to you in return as this is thier fault... that is why i suggest viking bear all the cost and apologize for his mistake... at least this can maintain his reputation and buyer get his pda phone in good condition as it send back to Asus to change casing and at that time viking can ask the Asus staff to check the condition of the PDA phone at least can make sure the phone is still in good condition before pass to buyer again... is that ok with you??i not here to flame you as i also learn from your opinion and other opinion as well ...correct me if i m wrong Added on July 31, 2007, 11:09 pm QUOTE(sam0919 @ Jul 31 2007, 10:55 PM) with the bolded words..lets say when u trying to buy a 2nd hand item..mobile phone...pcs..blabla anything..would u expect the seller tell u how many times it dropped b4? or give u the list which record down all the frequency by how many times the item dropped..repair...etc..? when u buy the 2nd hand items, u will expect it could not last longer rite? if u wan it function properly jus go and get a new 1 with warranty correct? and i dun think seller got such a free time to telling u all these and list down all those rubbish...somemore now the problem is not bcoz of the pda dropped b4..is bcoz the picture posted by seller do not match wat the buyer expected in mind.. i dun see viking agree to pay 100% as transportation and 50% casing still bear by buyer..did i say wrong and the seller agreed to pay 100% of loses..pls read the previous pages man...jus the TS dun wan to accept the offer.. This post has been edited by stevenlee: Jul 31 2007, 11:09 PM |
|
|
Jul 31 2007, 11:13 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,625 posts Joined: Dec 2005 |
QUOTE(stevenlee @ Jul 31 2007, 11:05 PM) bro, the statement u use above is quite dangerous...what if all the lyn-er practice what u say selling faulty unit will not refund as like dell and nokia?we can say the item is in good condition before post out just like Dell did..but reach buyer is faulty so no refund but we actually send out faulty unit... is that fine with u? Bro, I said no REFUND - means MONEY WILL NOT BE RETURNED. But of course warranty applicable & faulty parts must be replaced by seller. Is it fine with you if I buy something from you & ask for full refund just because you said new but i saw a scratch on the thing although it's functioning properly? (example)yup Dell and Nokia wont refund you..but at least they bear all the cost and might appologize to you in return as this is thier fault... that is why i suggest viking bear all the cost and apologize for his mistake... at least this can maintain his reputation and buyer get his pda phone in good condition as it send back to Asus to change casing and at that time viking can ask the Asus staff to check the condition of the PDA phone at least can make sure the phone is still in good condition before pass to buyer again... is that ok with you??i not here to flame you as i also learn from your opinion and other opinion as well ...correct me if i m wrong Yes,Viking agree to bear the cost. It's just that seller & buyer need to nego further on the percentage. Buyer STRICTLY WANTS HIS MONEY BACK. NO OTHER SOLUTION!!! What are you going to say for that? EDIT : buyer for seller This post has been edited by ViRaViRa: Jul 31 2007, 11:24 PM |
|
|
Jul 31 2007, 11:17 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,174 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
i'm not defending any side. ad_rv4 i know how you feel.. how about both of u check the price for new housing. i'm not sure the actual price, if the price around rm100+, at least u already know u only have to pay rm50+ to replace the housing (if u agreed to deal 50/50 with the seller)... or maybe u can nego 65/35... full refund is kinda impossible, even if u buy defected item at any shop, they will ask u to change with other item am i right?..
-if both of u still remain with your own decision, i'm sure this will not going anywhere.. if u not satisfied with changing the housing, u should give another solution (except full refund)... we all know this will ended eventually, n goodluck for both of u.. |
|
|
Jul 31 2007, 11:19 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,285 posts Joined: Mar 2007 |
QUOTE(vikingw2k @ Jul 31 2007, 09:39 PM) You are making yourself sounded as if you have lost interest in that phone and wanted back your cash so badly probably you got bored of it and wanted to buy other stuff or found better deal elsewhere.If you are genuine in solving this matter I don't see why you would reject my offer which is change the Top part for you and me bearing 100% of the cost, this already benefit you. Imagine, buy a used phone, and suddenly got extra damage, blame and accuse the seller blindly, seller generously just replace the casing for you FOC when you yourself could be suspected for the damage. Obviously this statement doesn't sounds right at all. You are just thinking of the buyer's side. Not as a neutral side. I would say, just leave this thread as you are not contributing anything to the resolution but inviting flames. Thanks QUOTE(stevenlee @ Jul 31 2007, 11:05 PM) i dun see viking agree to pay 100% as transportation and 50% casing still bear by buyer..did i say wrong with the bolded word..viking is agreed to bear all the losses no matter on transportation or changing new casing |
|
|
Jul 31 2007, 11:20 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,158 posts Joined: Apr 2005 From: -Butterworth, Penang- |
QUOTE(ViRaViRa @ Jul 31 2007, 11:13 PM) Bro, I said no REFUND - means MONEY WILL NOT BE RETURNED. But of course warranty applicable & faulty parts must be replaced by seller. Is it fine with you if I buy something from you & ask for full refund just because you said new but i saw a scratch on the thing although it's functioning properly? (example) for your first question i think it is not correct to answer in this forum as ppl might say i stand at other side...Yes,Viking agree to bear the cost. It's just that seller & buyer need to nego further on the percentage. Seller STRICTLY WANTS HIS MONEY BACK. NO OTHER SOLUTION!!! What are you going to say for that? i think you are saying BUYER want his money back instead of SELLER.... refund or not is up to viking but at least the minimal viking can do is replace the casing and do checking which all bear by seller and at least apologize for his mistake.... i think this will satisfied most of forumer here cos TE willing accept his mistake rather than pushing it out... |
|
|
Jul 31 2007, 11:22 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,625 posts Joined: Dec 2005 |
QUOTE(figure8 @ Jul 31 2007, 11:17 PM) i'm not defending any side. ad_rv4 i know how you feel.. how about both of u check the price for new housing. i'm not sure the actual price, if the price around rm100+, at least u already know u only have to pay rm50+ to replace the housing (if u agreed to deal 50/50 with the seller)... or maybe u can nego 65/35... full refund is kinda impossible, even if u buy defected item at any shop, they will ask u to change with other item am i right?.. Yes, agree with this. Maybe Viking can compensate a certain amount to ad_rv4 which the buyer can decide whether want to use it to change housing or use the current one. -if both of u still remain with your own decision, i'm sure this will not going anywhere.. if u not satisfied with changing the housing, u should give another solution (except full refund)... we all know this will ended eventually, n goodluck for both of u.. Is there any Asus Service Centre in Pahang? This can save courier cost & solve the problem... Added on July 31, 2007, 11:25 pm QUOTE(stevenlee @ Jul 31 2007, 11:20 PM) for your first question i think it is not correct to answer in this forum as ppl might say i stand at other side... Well, different people have different opinioni think you are saying BUYER want his money back instead of SELLER.... refund or not is up to viking but at least the minimal viking can do is replace the casing and do checking which all bear by seller and at least apologize for his mistake.... i think this will satisfied most of forumer here cos TE willing accept his mistake rather than pushing it out... Oh, that is an error. Thanks for highlighting This post has been edited by ViRaViRa: Jul 31 2007, 11:27 PM |
|
|
Jul 31 2007, 11:28 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,158 posts Joined: Apr 2005 From: -Butterworth, Penang- |
QUOTE(vikingw2k @ Jul 31 2007, 04:14 PM) Let's not waste more time, let me emphasize my proposal to you again. - You send the phone back to me(you bear the postage of course, you don't claim a company for your petrol charges when returning their products to them right?), - I'll send it to Asus Service Centre to change a new housing, I will check whether they need to replace the whole thing or just the top part. If it's just the top part, I will fork out 100%, if it's the whole casing, I will fork out 50%(as I believe that you too should fork out some money as it involved changing the whole thing and you are only claiming the top part). Either way is benificial to you because If you were to count dead grass, the Top part scratches is 20% since earlier on you said it looks like 80% Like new, So by right I should only pay 20% of the whole housing and You pay 80% of the balance cost, still I'm generous enough to fork out 50% of the cost of changing the entire casing for you when by right I only need to pay the part that you claimed. - I'll pickup the phone myself from Asus Service Centre( I'll bear my own transport cost) - I'll then check the phone, test and make sure everything is ok , upload a few pictures of the top part which they've replaced for you to see clearly the condition of the top part, - and finally You either send your courier to pickup from me or you bear my transportation + postage charges for me to send the item back to you (you don't ask a company to send back your claimed products at their cost don't you think so?) In short, - You only pay the postage tru and fro. - I'll pay the 100% cost of changing the top part, and 50% if it involves changing the whole casing. QUOTE(sam0919 @ Jul 31 2007, 11:19 PM) with the bolded word..viking is agreed to bear all the losses no matter on transportation or changing new casing bro, viking did not bear all the cost from seeing the above quote... changing casing mostly involve top and down...buyer has to pay 50% for down casing which he is not claiming |
|
|
Jul 31 2007, 11:33 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,285 posts Joined: Mar 2007 |
sry my fault =.=
|
|
|
Jul 31 2007, 11:36 PM
|
|
VIP
9,778 posts Joined: Jun 2005 From: KL(Wangsa Maju) , Seremban 2 |
Just in case you guys missed out any points from my proposal
» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... « This post has been edited by vikingw2k: Jul 31 2007, 11:36 PM |
|
|
Jul 31 2007, 11:50 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
478 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Kuantan, PAHANG |
[quote=vikingw2k,Jul 31 2007, 11:36 PM]
Just in case you guys missed out any points from my proposal » Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... « [/quote] i have accused u blindly?? it is a joke |
|
|
Jul 31 2007, 11:51 PM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
107 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
Come on, give viking a chance. Proposed resolution is very resonable.
|
|
|
Jul 31 2007, 11:54 PM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
152 posts Joined: Jun 2007 From: Perak |
its just about the pda sold is not up to what advertised.. an ethical yet responsible seller will surely refund since its clearly his fault for not stating/showing the pda's real condition even after being asked by TS.. resulting to misleading..
|
|
|
Jul 31 2007, 11:57 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
478 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Kuantan, PAHANG |
u dun see ka??? he give good solution but his words trying to blame me of what happen, if i accept then i will be the cheater of the story..don't you realize that??? thats y i need seller to make clear statement here that he is misleading buyer than after that i will give my desicision..
This post has been edited by ad_rv4: Jul 31 2007, 11:58 PM |
|
|
Aug 1 2007, 12:01 AM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
152 posts Joined: Jun 2007 From: Perak |
well, why should we give an unethical seller a chance? so he can do those unethic tactics again?
|
|
|
Aug 1 2007, 12:02 AM
|
|
VIP
9,778 posts Joined: Jun 2005 From: KL(Wangsa Maju) , Seremban 2 |
QUOTE(ad_rv4 @ Jul 31 2007, 11:57 PM) u dun see ka??? he give good solution but his words trying to blame me of what happen, if i accept then i will be the cheater of the story..don't you realize that??? thats y i need seller to make clear statement here that he is misleading buyer than after that i will give my desicision.. You are hilarious, why would someone call you a cheater if you accept the casing-replacement solution proposed by me? Are you saying that this is the main reason you don't want to accept this good and fair solution, fearing that people would call you a cheater? wandzul - stay out if you are not here to contribute a useful solution. This post has been edited by vikingw2k: Aug 1 2007, 12:11 AM |
|
|
Aug 1 2007, 12:04 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
920 posts Joined: Jun 2005 |
since he is giving the good solution , u also said that ( in post 408 , 11.57 pm) , why dun u guys solve it ? 2 side also got wrong ,there is no winner here.
nobody is cheater, story creater. misunderstand , misinterpret , careless onli ...every1 learns from it lor... in this realistic world , there is no full refund la. even in tesco , u accidentaly pick a faulty items or the staff hand you the faulty item , there is no refund but there is exchange .rite? since we have a good solution , y dun accept it and case closed n stop blamming, flamming , and etc? nobody here is kido lo , problem solving is important ma ! -juz my point of view - if viking is unethical , he wont come here to solve the problem and give solution and explanation . this word is not suitable in this case! This post has been edited by Rena_blue: Aug 1 2007, 12:06 AM |
|
|
Aug 1 2007, 12:08 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,028 posts Joined: Sep 2004 From: KL |
QUOTE(ad_rv4 @ Jul 31 2007, 11:57 PM) u dun see ka??? he give good solution but his words trying to blame me of what happen, if i accept then i will be the cheater of the story..don't you realize that??? thats y i need seller to make clear statement here that he is misleading buyer than after that i will give my desicision.. dont you realise what you are saying here is a double edged sword?The same words could be used on you as well. Only replace the "good solution" with "full refund" and seller with buyer and what you are saying there, is you are trying to force a confession from what might be an innocent case. This post has been edited by DaIdiot: Aug 1 2007, 12:12 AM |
|
|
Aug 1 2007, 12:29 AM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
152 posts Joined: Jun 2007 From: Perak |
viking, i oredi gave my solution, and that is full refund..
but since u still insist on not to refund, yet u wanna replace the casing then this is my another solution. why not u just apologize to TS publicly about ur mistake on the deceiving/misleading sale thread.. and the u cover the cost of replacing the housing to an exactly 95% NEW or better housing, since TS paid the amount expecting to receive a pda with 95% NEW condition (as what u advertised in ur sale thread).. remember, the cost must be on u bcos its clearly ur mistake/fault for not providing accurate details about the pda, so u must correct ur own mistake.. so what say u? and TS pls accept the solution just to save the hassle of arguing and flaming here n there.. btw, the pda is still in good working condition rite? |
|
|
Aug 1 2007, 12:32 AM
|
|
VIP
9,778 posts Joined: Jun 2005 From: KL(Wangsa Maju) , Seremban 2 |
QUOTE(wandzul @ Aug 1 2007, 12:29 AM) u cover the cost of replacing the housing to an exactly 95% NEW or better housing You, just missed this post by me. |
|
|
Aug 1 2007, 12:37 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
478 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Kuantan, PAHANG |
QUOTE(wandzul @ Aug 1 2007, 12:29 AM) viking, i oredi gave my solution, and that is full refund.. apologize to me publicly and admit ur mistake on the deceiving/misleading sale thread would be the first stage of this solution, i bet this is the hardest stage for him now!!but since u still insist on not to refund, yet u wanna replace the casing then this is my another solution. why not u just apologize to TS publicly about ur mistake on the deceiving/misleading sale thread.. and the u cover the cost of replacing the housing to an exactly 95% NEW or better housing, since TS paid the amount expecting to receive a pda with 95% NEW condition (as what u advertised in ur sale thread).. remember, the cost must be on u bcos its clearly ur mistake/fault for not providing accurate details about the pda, so u must correct ur own mistake.. so what say u? and TS pls accept the solution just to save the hassle of arguing and flaming here n there.. btw, the pda is still in good working condition rite? |
|
|
Aug 1 2007, 12:38 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
920 posts Joined: Jun 2005 |
aiyoyo.... where is the buyer neh ??
viking will get dispute lo if he delaying the time >.< sob sob ~ act fast fast since the buyer so concern this issue !! by the way , eh..if viking apologies ,it means that he is deceiving /misleading the sale wo ...but , he doesnt wo , according to his reply here la! so ... how ar?? however , i think both of the parties have fault also ..y dont settle it quickly as some of us also quite headpain n bored on this issue edi ? please , both of u !!!! if buyer dunwan accept it due to this reason and Viking got dispute . then is it fair ? then is it viking is a so called unethical seller here? n then the buyer go and tell who n who ...n sort of like black mailling the seller... OMG!! SETTLE IT ASAP O ~ nobody going to be blamed . nobody going to be winner . IF both of u really concern bout our this lyn community... we are getting tired of this lurr thankQ~! This post has been edited by Rena_blue: Aug 1 2007, 12:43 AM |
|
|
Aug 1 2007, 12:52 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
327 posts Joined: Aug 2006 From: Coffee Paradise |
Well , let me give some opinion.
As a seller ( promoter ) before , what will i do when this happen is : 1. Officially apologize to TS 2. Fully replace the casing as other forumers mentioned. 3. Compensation like RM 50 since didnt notice the fault.( In this case u accuse that seller cover it , so cant confirm ) TS , u may think that why should u accept ? But honestly u are a teacher too and u know what is reality. We all can angry viking at misleading buyer and IF he do that. Let say i am Buyer in this case : Sure i will ASK for FULL REFUND bcoz being "cheated" . But that is under condition" the guy willing refund to you regardless BUSINESS NATURE". In this case u may say " I will TOTALLY no buy the PDA BUT wat if the small crack only ? In this case u may NOT SATISFY wif the outside LOOK only. If i were u, i would 1. Ask the seller refund too if able,if not 2.Ask for some compensation 3.Fully replace the casing and since it DROPPED, i will ask seller to borne up the post fees for RMA under shown the terms INCLUDED which is NOT my FAULT I am a student , i will think it logically and reasoning it wisely. The last TS , u did a BIG ERROR which is NEVER DISCUSS with seller before open a thread here. So what we will think about you? |
|
|
Aug 1 2007, 12:55 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,386 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Many calls it "Hell" |
After reading almost all the post (excluding those rubbish post), i would like to say a word or two...I hope both parties won't get offended or whatsoever. I will edit this post accordingly if someone is not satisfied.
Firstly, from what i read here and checking Viking's sales thread, it seems as if viking is trying to avoid showing the slight scratch or crack whatever you call it by not highlighting the pictures. However, you can't expect a seller to post up a 360' image on what he or she is selling, as what viking replied, he would have highlighted the scratched parts if he was asked by ad_rv4. So from here i do feel viking still has some valid terms to refuse a full refund. The solution proposed by Viking is quite proper to me, which he agrees on a new casing, so that basically solves the problem. Ad_rv4 is not happy as he felt he is cheated and he felt the scratch was hidden on purpose, however 95% new doesn't mean item is in 100% mint condition. If i am the buyer, i will feel unsatisfied too and will feel cheated as well, however i feel it's a little too harsh to accept only full refund. Try consider viking's proposal on solving the issue. My proposed solution: Viking: 1) As you proposed, a replacement on the casing and also an apology due to the scratch. I would not say that you're wrong, but you can't deny that to a certain extend, Ad_rv4 deserves a proper explanation to it. 2) Full refund (or almost full refund), and sell the phone to another party, but shipping charges should be beared by buyer as he rejected the first solution. Ad_rv4: 1) Accept the casing offer and also apologise to Viking for being sometimes slightly harsh and rude, i understand you feelings but try to calm down and solve this issue properly. 2.) Try to tolerate a little, and accept for say a 95%(You guys make out the figure) refund or something. But accept to ship back the phone to Viking at your cost and responsibility. Means if anything happen to this phone during the shipping, you should be held liable. Whatever also, i just hope tat both parties can try to calm down, and each take a step back. We're not kids anymore, so solve this maturely, no point trying to blame the other party. I feel a sincere apology from both parties is necessary. Nobody is fully at fault for this issue. Thats all i have to say. Thank you for reading. |
|
|
Aug 1 2007, 01:00 AM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
76 posts Joined: Mar 2006 |
rambut sama hitam, hati lain lain...U dun judge a book by only cover rite? even alot of tradelist cant guarantee he wont do any sin...
TS is paying rm1250 for a PDA phone only..and suddenly he get a large hole on his phone and need to top up extra bucks to fix it..TS juz want to get a reasonable price phone but turn out get a PDA phone like tat and need top up for the crack.. as seller mention b4 the previous owner drop this phone b4,I think seller should inform the buyer bout this...what we can look is only external look but how bout internal part?(I think quite serious since it is a big crack+hole) who would want to buy a pda phone that drop and got crack?For what reason TS want to damage the phone himself ? bcoz the money? I think TS can sell back around that price lar(without the crack)as some forummer here said that TS is desperate for the money..so it is not reasonable to say buyer who create the crack. TS got own reason to create this thread as he believe he is rite 2cents ..btw TS ..i know you are angry but dun let the situation and your mood control you as other ppl make take this chance to hit you back.. sorry for broken english .. my suggestion is refund back to TS since it is wasting both your time This post has been edited by ng121: Aug 1 2007, 01:03 AM |
|
|
Aug 1 2007, 01:04 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
920 posts Joined: Jun 2005 |
duo8668, u give a very good view here ^^
thumbs up !! however , i have 1 point here. what if viking apologies then the buyer use this point to "hentam" him ? forced him to refund full amount or might blackmail him ? in this matter , each of them also have wrong n right, dunno who is right or wrong also wo...this case too many "suspiscious points" ..which onli them 2 know the truth of it . Viking might be innocent also ... y dun both also say sorry n baik baik leh and proceed to the casing changing stage ?? |
|
|
Aug 1 2007, 01:07 AM
|
![]()
Junior Member
25 posts Joined: Jan 2007 From: null |
QUOTE(vikingw2k @ Jul 31 2007, 09:53 PM) No, You are wrong. The phone was slightly scratched on the top during that drop. That drop is not the cause for the bad damage in his picture. Please get your facts right. FACT:By your post, I believe that there is/are scratch(s) on top of the pda. On how much the damage(s) is, I cannot assume since there is no hard proof. ~So here is the history~ -Buyer asks for details of 5% from seller. av_rv4 - vikingw2k bro, i juz back home, confirm wan to buy this pda, can u reserved me till 2morrow???? got prove of ori receipt??? 95% like new so which part is stracth??? -Seller suggests buyer to refer his photos but he failed to mention/show the top part. vikingw2k - av_rv4 I've the warranty card, stated there bought on 1/7/2007 You can claim from Asus Distributor if anything goes wrong, just call them and they'll send courier to pickup from you and send back to you once they serviced(Free of Charge)* *from what i heard You can see the actual condition on my thread. I posted a few clear pics of the actual item. I'll need deposit to reserve the item for you coz there's another dude coming tonight update me once you've bank in deposit RMXXX to my account below Banking Details Removed -Buyer agrees to buy with the pda condition after convinced that 5% only in seller's pictures despite he does not know the top part scratch(s). -After the item has been received, buyer found out about the top part's scratch(s) (I would not mention the condition of what buyer claim since it is contradict to what seller claim). -So buyer claim that the pda is in different condition because of the top part and thus, he feels that he was been cheated. ~End of history~ In my POV, I don't think this is a WIN WIN situation anymore, instead it should be WIN LOSE. For example, if someone was caught in wrong doing to other and ended up in court, he will be punished. However, because of the refund thing is not possible, I suggest that the buyer to take the seller offer to replace the top part with original part by seller fund if only possible, and yes seller should apologize of his carelessness. Other than that, I hope you two can settle this maturely. |
|
|
Aug 1 2007, 01:10 AM
|
|
Admin
1,806 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Captain's Cabin, Black Pearl |
QUOTE(ad_rv4 @ Jul 31 2007, 11:57 PM) u dun see ka??? he give good solution but his words trying to blame me of what happen, if i accept then i will be the cheater of the story..don't you realize that??? thats y i need seller to make clear statement here that he is misleading buyer than after that i will give my desicision.. You are pushing this too far. What is done is done, the purpose of this forum is to solve the dispute as quickly and as fairly as possible. You yourself have now said the seller has given a "good solution" but you are now bringing up subjective things like his words, blame you etc etc. This dispute will not be settled based on your terms and conditions. If your sole intention is to bring a trade enforcer (and this community) to disrepute for a small issue like this, its not going to happen.If we find the sellers solution to be reasonable, and that you choose to refuse the solution without proper justification, the dispute will be ruled in favor of the seller - irrespective of your claims. You will than not receive anything for your troubles. Due to the special circumstances of this case (seller being a trade enforcer), 10 random senior members from the forum will be picked to go through the details and come to a verdict on the dispute. |
|
|
Aug 1 2007, 01:17 AM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
75 posts Joined: Aug 2005 |
QUOTE (ingjoo @ Jul 31 2007, 07:42 PM)
vikingw2k.. so far i haven't seen any of your witnesses reply to this thread here, what we see is that they come to this thread and view the photos and sms/pm their comments? hard to convinced us right.. Actually we still haven't heard anything from the witnesses that Viking mentioned before. So we still don't know how bad is the crack before Viking sold the PDA to TS |
|
|
Aug 1 2007, 01:22 AM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
152 posts Joined: Jun 2007 From: Perak |
so i guess the best solution of all is:
(1) Seller apologize to TS formally for his mistake and TS too apologize formally for some rude postings.. (2) Seller bear the cost of replacing a 95% NEW housing or better, since its his mistake (misleading sale thread).. (3) We all then carry on with our normal lives.. what say u TS and viking? |
|
|
Aug 1 2007, 01:38 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
478 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Kuantan, PAHANG |
QUOTE(se7en @ Aug 1 2007, 01:10 AM) You are pushing this too far. What is done is done, the purpose of this forum is to solve the dispute as quickly and as fairly as possible. You yourself have now said the seller has given a "good solution" but you are now bringing up subjective things like his words, blame you etc etc. This dispute will not be settled based on your terms and conditions. If your sole intention is to bring a trade enforcer (and this community) to disrepute for a small issue like this, its not going to happen. If we find the sellers solution to be reasonable, and that you choose to refuse the solution without proper justification, the dispute will be ruled in favor of the seller - irrespective of your claims. You will than not receive anything for your troubles. Due to the special circumstances of this case (seller being a trade enforcer), 10 random senior members from the forum will be picked to go through the details and come to a verdict on the dispute. QUOTE(vikingw2k @ Jul 31 2007, 04:14 PM) I guess this proposal is reasonable enough. The reasons supporting this my apologise, i dun agreed of what he claim me accused him blindly..i agreed with wandzul solution, thanks for ur good ideas - You've accused me blindly for the damage on the top part . So the root of this problem is the Top part. Changing the housing will remove the cosmetic damage on the Top part. |
|
|
Aug 1 2007, 01:47 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,031 posts Joined: Sep 2006 From: â–▂▃▅▇ Ù©Í¡[à¹Ì¯Í¡à¹]Û¶? |
THis is malaysian.
I suggest buyer to come to an agreement with the seller since this case has come to a high profile review case by the moderator. it's already a win win situation here. QUOTE(se7en @ Aug 1 2007, 01:10 AM) You are pushing this too far. What is done is done, the purpose of this forum is to solve the dispute as quickly and as fairly as possible. You yourself have now said the seller has given a "good solution" but you are now bringing up subjective things like his words, blame you etc etc. This dispute will not be settled based on your terms and conditions. If your sole intention is to bring a trade enforcer (and this community) to disrepute for a small issue like this, its not going to happen. This is malaysian nick postingIf we find the sellers solution to be reasonable, and that you choose to refuse the solution without proper justification, the dispute will be ruled in favor of the seller - irrespective of your claims. You will than not receive anything for your troubles. Due to the special circumstances of this case (seller being a trade enforcer), 10 random senior members from the forum will be picked to go through the details and come to a verdict on the dispute. There is no dispute about the pda anymore.So remember to judge correctly and pick up 10 random senior members. And the 10 random seniors members cannot be involved in any trading (seller in lyn) to make the right judgement Remember to look at my photoshop pictures and compare to seller PDA thread's pictures. QUOTE(wandzul @ Aug 1 2007, 01:22 AM) so i guess the best solution of all is: 1) agree with number one but still need moderator to review this case again under misleading offence.(1) Seller apologize to TS formally for his mistake and TS too apologize formally for some rude postings.. (2) Seller bear the cost of replacing a 95% NEW housing or better, since its his mistake (misleading sale thread).. (3) We all then carry on with our normal lives.. what say u TS and viking? 2) cannot be apply before case review by moderators or 10 senior member.Only apply after seller found guilty of misleading. 3)True. Since both cant agree with each other term.We will wait for the solution from the 10 senior member and moderator.Nothing much to do now ![]() This post has been edited by RoxyGal: Aug 1 2007, 01:47 AM |
|
|
Aug 1 2007, 01:47 AM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
152 posts Joined: Jun 2007 From: Perak |
so now we need to wait for viking's decision then.. whether to agree or not.. if agree, then no need to wait for review by senior members anymore since the dispute are to be settled nicely..
This post has been edited by wandzul: Aug 1 2007, 01:50 AM |
|
|
Aug 1 2007, 02:55 AM
|
|
Forum Admin
44,415 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
QUOTE(wandzul @ Jul 31 2007, 11:54 PM) its just about the pda sold is not up to what advertised.. an ethical yet responsible seller will surely refund since its clearly his fault for not stating/showing the pda's real condition even after being asked by TS.. resulting to misleading.. point to ponder : why would Vikingw2k would want to risk his reputation as Trade Enforcer and Safe Traders just over a deal?QUOTE(ad_rv4 @ Aug 1 2007, 01:38 AM) my apologise, i dun agreed of what he claim me accused him blindly..i agreed with wandzul solution, thanks for ur good ideas :respect firstly, so far i do not see any proof that he's attempting to mislead you. why would he event want to damage his own status and reputation?secondly, and wandzul's idea wasn't new. viking had offered you replacement of the casing which you declined in earlier pages. perhaps the thing you liked was to hear an apology from him? if that is so then it's going a bit too far since you weren't a gentleman yourself in sorting this issue. even if he mislead you, the fact that he's offering to replace your casing is already shows a lot responsibility and integrity in him as a seller. thirdly, seriously you could've just taken the casing la. you can still sell the PDA off at a far higher price with possible profit. This post has been edited by goldfries: Aug 1 2007, 02:55 AM |
|
|
Aug 1 2007, 03:32 AM
|
|
VIP
9,778 posts Joined: Jun 2005 From: KL(Wangsa Maju) , Seremban 2 |
ad_rv4,
For once and all, why don't we put aside all the ego, fingers-pointing and just settle this dispute nicely? You've claimed that my proposal was a good one. So why don't we just stick to it and you send it back to me asap instead of dragging this further? Basically it's up to you now since you yourself said that my proposal was a good one. If you send the phone to me by tomorrow and allow me to work out the rest like what I've planned, everything gonna settle and end nicely and you'll get back your phone asap. As simple as that. My same proposal to you » Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... « |
|
|
Aug 1 2007, 08:20 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,236 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: BB Bangi |
QUOTE(RoxyGal @ Aug 1 2007, 01:47 AM) This is malaysian nick posting There is no dispute about the pda anymore.So remember to judge correctly and pick up 10 random senior members. And the 10 random seniors members cannot be involved in any trading (seller in lyn) to make the right judgement Remember to look at my photoshop pictures and compare to seller PDA thread's pictures. ![]() dun try to create fake evidence here from your own unproven forensics.. |
|
|
Aug 1 2007, 08:41 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
478 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Kuantan, PAHANG |
better solution :
1. seller replace the whole casing since the scracth/crack invovled front+back casing, i don't know why ur refering to the top casing???? 2. i will call ASUS CENTRE and ask them the cost of the whole casing and inform seller. 3. seller bank in the money to my acc. 4. i will go on my own to ASUS CENTRE to replace the casing, so next time i know the place, i ask the people there anything about the PDA, that's the better way i learn of my ASUS P525, im still learning using PDA.. so HOW????? This post has been edited by ad_rv4: Aug 1 2007, 10:10 AM |
|
|
Aug 1 2007, 08:58 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
311 posts Joined: Sep 2006 |
nice
better to prevent pda kena tukar. |
|
|
Aug 1 2007, 09:05 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,236 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: BB Bangi |
QUOTE(ad_rv4 @ Aug 1 2007, 08:41 AM) better solution : there is no proof that shows that who created the crack there, so i think asking for a full casing replacement is a bit unfair to the seller, dealing stuffs thru postage does suffer from risks of dead/damage on arrival, and i think that risk should be borne by buyer cause it is the method that he chose to transact. i'm not jumping to conclusions that the damage was done by postage though, don't get me wrong.. so i believe seller does need to bear a bit of responsibility in this case, and so do u as the buyer.1. seller replace the whole casing since the scracth/crack invovled front+back+centre casing, i don't know why ur refering to the top casing???? 2. i will call ASUS CENTRE and ask them the cost of the whole casing and inform seller. 3. seller bank in the money to my acc. 4. i will go on my own to ASUS CENTRE to replace the casing, so next time i know the place, i ask the people there anything about the PDA, that's the better way i learn of my ASUS P525, im still learning using PDA.. so HOW????? however, if the seller decides to give u a full casing replacement, then consider yourself lucky, cause that is not 100% his responsibility.. for transparency purposes, u might wanna ask for a quote from Asus using email, and post the quote here..just a suggestion though.. u decide.. peace |
|
|
Aug 1 2007, 09:10 AM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
152 posts Joined: Jun 2007 From: Perak |
QUOTE(goldfries @ Aug 1 2007, 02:55 AM) point to ponder : why would Vikingw2k would want to risk his reputation as Trade Enforcer and Safe Traders just over a deal? we dont know why but its still his mistake, doesnt it? and still yet he cant explain why the defects arent visible in his sale thread thus resulting to misleading.. (can only see when u adjust the gamma)so i think TS deserves an apology.. but viking also deserves one from TS due to some quite rude postings.. isnt it? @TS ur proposal is better since its clearly not ur fault about the misleading sale thread.. so its seller's responsibility to replace the housing as what he advertised (95% NEW).. or he can just refund 95% of new housing cost (TS has to add 5% more eh since u only bought a 95% NEW pda) This post has been edited by wandzul: Aug 1 2007, 09:13 AM |
|
|
Aug 1 2007, 09:17 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,236 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: BB Bangi |
QUOTE(wandzul @ Aug 1 2007, 09:10 AM) we dont know why but its still his mistake, doesnt it? and still yet he cant explain why the defects arent visible in his sale thread thus resulting to misleading.. (can only see when u adjust the gamma) huh?? adjust gamma? so u're taking malaysian's forensics for real?so i think TS deserves an apology.. but viking also deserves one from TS due to some quite rude postings.. isnt it? common lah, that is just a photo defect.. what responsibility do seller have to bear for some under exposure in the photo??? refer to post #232, compare the part that malaysian circled, and the photo that buyer posted, is there any hole/scratches that resembles the black spot there?? This post has been edited by kevin613: Aug 1 2007, 09:21 AM |
|
|
Aug 1 2007, 09:25 AM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
152 posts Joined: Jun 2007 From: Perak |
QUOTE(kevin613 @ Aug 1 2007, 09:17 AM) huh?? adjust gamma? so u're taking malaysian's forensics for real? so seller can use underexposured pics as an excuse?? u dont forget that TS oredi asked about where's the scratches.. and seller asked to see the pics advertised.. where can see one? it looked like there's no scratch liao.. common lah, that is just a photo defect.. what responsibility do seller have to bear for some under exposure in the photo??? refer to post #232, compare the part that malaysian circled, and the photo that buyer posted, is there any hole/scratches that resembles the black spot there?? well, would u accept it as photo effect if u're the buyer? in sale thread u dont even see one (unless the chrome button).. when it comes to ur hand, voila, nice crack! do it ur self and u'll see whats there.. dont be too lazy dude.. need to highlight again? This post has been edited by wandzul: Aug 1 2007, 09:36 AM |
|
|
Aug 1 2007, 09:41 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,236 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: BB Bangi |
QUOTE(wandzul @ Aug 1 2007, 09:25 AM) so seller can use underexposured pics as an excuse?? u dont forget that TS oredi asked about where's the scratches.. and seller asked to see the pics advertised.. where can see one? it looked like there's no scratch liao.. i'm not here to argue with u k..well, would u accept it as photo effect if u're the buyer? in sale thread u dont even see one (unless the chrome button).. when it comes to ur hand, voila, nice crack! do it ur self and u'll see whats there.. dont be too lazy dude.. need to highlight again? that isn't even an effect that is created on purpose, don't just argue for the sake of winning the arguement.. use your common sense, and u will know that underexposure is very common in photography, and that part that malaysian highlighted and circled, doesn't have any defects at all.. don't nit-pick something out of nothing and try to win an arguement. i have no intention of arguing, just pointing the fact to u that the underexposure wasn't created on purpose, and the point that malaysian pointed out using his uber leet photoshop skills is not valid at all.. don't get too personal.. This post has been edited by kevin613: Aug 1 2007, 09:43 AM |
|
|
Aug 1 2007, 09:44 AM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
152 posts Joined: Jun 2007 From: Perak |
QUOTE(kevin613 @ Aug 1 2007, 09:41 AM) i'm not here to argue with u k.. not really.. did u see pics from TS also? are they photo effect too? same place? same shape? LOL.. do investigate dude..that isn't even an effect that is created on purpose, don't just argue for the sake of winning the arguement.. use your common sense, and u will know that underexposure is very common in photography, and that part that malaysian highlighted and circled, doesn't have any defects at all.. don't nit-pick something out of nothing and try to win an arguement. i have no intention of arguing, just pointing the fact to u that the underexposure wasn't created on purpose, and the point that malaysian pointed out is not valid at all.. don't get too personal.. |
|
|
Aug 1 2007, 09:49 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,236 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: BB Bangi |
QUOTE(wandzul @ Aug 1 2007, 09:44 AM) not really.. did u see pics from TS also? are they photo effect too? same place? same shape? LOL.. do investigate dude.. i am just pointing out what u wrote earlier,about the gamma tweaking with photoshop done by malaysian which u think is valid.show me which pic from TS that u're referring to, and i shall comment furthur.. refer to my post #232, i've compared the edited photos from malaysian(taken from seller), and photos from buyer, same spot, nothing appeared there that resembles the black spot that appears after gamma tweaking.. so how much investigation that u've done that u concluded that malaysian's point is valid? This post has been edited by kevin613: Aug 1 2007, 09:56 AM |
|
|
Aug 1 2007, 10:23 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,589 posts Joined: Nov 2004 |
Based on viking's T&C
1. bla bla 2. bla bla 3. Item that's still under warranty is to be claimed by buyer them self from its respective distributor or retailer at their own cost. e.g. Dallab, Mio , CMV , and other products. Contacts & address of respective distributor will be given upon request. The good sold here is still under warranty, but due to cosmetic changes this does not apply. 4. Buyer pays for both side postage when returning faulty item. Item returned will be tested and will be returned if found non defective. Item sold are not refundable or exchangeable & same goes to shipping & handling fees. This applies to the solution provided by viking. 5. bla bla 6. Fussy buyers please stay away, please understand the term of 2nd hand item. TS is definitely fussy. 7. bla bla 8. bla bla 9. bla bla In the T&C, the risk is shipping is not clearly stated. E.g. "If postage, buyer bears the risk of loss, damage, mishandling bla bla" is not written in the T&C. So both side is at a loss right now. Solution proposed : 1. Accept viking's proposal HERE. 2. Accept TS proposal (FULL REFUND) Since neither is compromising, my suggestion is : 1. TS send item back to seller and bear all postage fees. 2. Seller change the housing and pay using the money profited from the trade. 3. If money profited not enough to cover cost, then Housing cost - profit = Xtra Xtra / 2 = bear both side Fair enough? Then seller won't profit anything and might have to pay for the repair cost which is resulted from the flawed T&C. Buyer bear half the risk of changing housing as well (depend on the housing cost and seller profit $$). |
|
|
Aug 1 2007, 10:25 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
327 posts Joined: Aug 2006 From: Coffee Paradise |
QUOTE(ad_rv4 @ Jul 31 2007, 10:58 AM) QUOTE(ad_rv4 @ Jul 31 2007, 11:04 AM) SELLER and CHEATER are not the same, better read thru the thread again laa... Off topic , I have no idea where should I put this but may us all get formal apologize from TS , on behalf his miss use word and since he is a teacher he should know it more and us and sure for his MORAL . Added on July 31, 2007, 11:07 am trying to fight the truth, his chinese say not irrelevant to this matter.. if bought toto can laarr..hehe Quoted from LYN R&R Action: Political and Religious Topic, discussions are welcomed in Real World Issues forum. But do not spread political propaganda or religious hatred in any of Lowyat.NET forums. Obey the sub-forum rules as they are enforced very strictly. Result: Offending threads or post will be edited, closed, or removed. Offenders may be warned depending on severity of the offence. Members who promote racial hatred will be banned. I am not rise another issue here , just want the TS realize what wrong he did and viking no yet flame up the issue to make him been banned but still keep assist him in get compensation. |
|
|
Aug 1 2007, 10:31 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
885 posts Joined: Mar 2006 From: Johor Bahru |
QUOTE(suiteng @ Aug 1 2007, 10:23 AM) Since neither is compromising, my suggestion is : If TS were to agree to THAT solution, this thread will NOT span until 23 pages already. TS is so adamant in either:1. TS send item back to seller and bear all postage fees. 2. Seller change the housing and pay using the money profited from the trade. 3. If money profited not enough to cover cost, then Housing cost - profit = Xtra Xtra / 2 = bear both side Fair enough? Then seller won't profit anything and might have to pay for the repair cost which is resulted from the flawed T&C. Buyer bear half the risk of changing housing as well (depend on the housing cost and seller profit $$). 1. Get a full refund 2. Have vikingw2k special title striped off.. As i said in my previous post, for wat reason? only god knows |
|
|
Aug 1 2007, 10:46 AM
|
|
Admin
1,806 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Captain's Cabin, Black Pearl |
@wandzul : your account is barely a month old and you're making unnecessary comments on this thread. Unless you have something constructive to say to help solve the dispute, keep your comments (and assumptions) to yourself.
@ad_rv4 : you will be serving out your 7 days suspension for posting racist comments on the completion of this dispute. |
|
|
Aug 1 2007, 10:59 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
478 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Kuantan, PAHANG |
i hv made my apology.. what i hv to do next???
|
|
|
Aug 1 2007, 10:59 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
885 posts Joined: Mar 2006 From: Johor Bahru |
boss, does that mean TS cannot post here during the suspension period?
|
|
|
Aug 1 2007, 11:00 AM
|
|
Admin
1,806 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Captain's Cabin, Black Pearl |
@zyrl : the suspension will commence once this dispute is settled.
|
|
|
Aug 1 2007, 11:11 AM
|
![]()
Newbie
0 posts Joined: Jul 2007 |
QUOTE(se7en @ Aug 1 2007, 10:46 AM) @wandzul : your account is barely a month old and you're making unnecessary comments on this thread. Unless you have something constructive to say to help solve the dispute, keep your comments (and assumptions) to yourself. why VIKING is not awarded with DISPUTE tag yet mr admin ?@ad_rv4 : you will be serving out your 7 days suspension for posting racist comments on the completion of this dispute. U gave three days and even an extra 24 hours right ? it seems unfair.... Mind explain ? |
|
|
Aug 1 2007, 11:16 AM
|
![]()
Junior Member
34 posts Joined: Dec 2006 |
TS,why dont u just accepted what the viking had offered.If he totally cover all the cost of changing the casing,its totally unfair..ya..the seller mentioned that its 95% like new,but u considered it as 80% like new,because the 15% different is causes at the top crack..( the 1st problem i read in this thread,and at first u always keep mentioned about that top crack)..if that pda phone need to change the whole casing,share the cost..then u'll get 100% like new.
if u want to change it by urself,the seller should bank in to ur acc,but not the 100% of the cost. just my opponion. |
|
|
Aug 1 2007, 11:17 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
885 posts Joined: Mar 2006 From: Johor Bahru |
QUOTE(antonioraj @ Aug 1 2007, 11:11 AM) why VIKING is not awarded with DISPUTE tag yet mr admin ? Explanation:U gave three days and even an extra 24 hours right ? it seems unfair.... Mind explain ? DISPUTE tags are only awarded to people who refuse to settle the dispute. this is not the case. vikingw2k is here to settle the dispute |
|
|
Aug 1 2007, 11:22 AM
|
|
VIP
9,778 posts Joined: Jun 2005 From: KL(Wangsa Maju) , Seremban 2 |
QUOTE(antonioraj @ Aug 1 2007, 11:11 AM) why VIKING is not awarded with DISPUTE tag yet mr admin ? TS has now accepted the proposal of mine, and now he's proposing something back to me and I'm considering it before replying it here. Which means that we've met a small solution now and not wasting our time leaving the dispute unsolved. So are you here to help us with some good and fair suggestions OR you are here just for the sake of getting me a dispute tag? U gave three days and even an extra 24 hours right ? it seems unfair.... Mind explain ? QUOTE(se7en @ Jul 30 2007, 09:16 AM) viking, the same 3 days rule applies to you. If there is no amicable settlement between you and your buyer in this case, we will have no choice but to assign you the dispute resolution tag for failing to come to an amicable settlement in a trade zone dispute. This post has been edited by vikingw2k: Aug 1 2007, 11:23 AM |
|
|
Aug 1 2007, 11:42 AM
|
|
Admin
1,806 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Captain's Cabin, Black Pearl |
QUOTE(antonioraj @ Aug 1 2007, 11:11 AM) why VIKING is not awarded with DISPUTE tag yet mr admin ? I was just considering your appeal to reduce your original suspension, and you're back disrupting the dispute resolution process with a new duplicate account. U gave three days and even an extra 24 hours right ? it seems unfair.... Mind explain ? Your duplicate account is terminated, and your original suspension is now extended by an additional 7 days. You are not helping the dispute, nor are you giving any constructive opinions to solve the dispute. Giving out dispute tags would mean the dispute isn't solved, or either party is not willing to solve the dispute, and you seem to be only interested in that happening. We will decide when and if a tag is given out based on the progress of the dispute resolution process. |
|
|
Aug 1 2007, 12:49 PM
|
|
VIP
9,778 posts Joined: Jun 2005 From: KL(Wangsa Maju) , Seremban 2 |
Proposal by ad_rv4
QUOTE(ad_rv4 @ Aug 1 2007, 08:41 AM) 1. seller replace the whole casing since the scracth/crack invovled front+back casing, i don't know why ur refering to the top casing???? VK - Explaining my fair reasonable proposal to him I'm fine with term 2,3,4. but still ponder about term 1.2. i will call ASUS CENTRE and ask them the cost of the whole casing and inform seller. VK - I'm fine with this 3. seller bank in the money to my acc. VK - I'm fine with this 4. i will go on my own to ASUS CENTRE to replace the casing, so next time i know the place, i ask the people there anything about the PDA, that's the better way i learn of my ASUS P525, im still learning using PDA.. VK - I'm fine with this so HOW????? VK - Now we've reached 75% (3/4) of the solution QUOTE(vikingw2k @ Jul 31 2007 @ 04:14 PM)) My Very First Proposal until now I'll explain in detail again about my proposal just in case you cant get what I'm trying to say. I said that I will call Asus Service Centre to get a quote for the casing replacement. I'll check with them whether do they need to replace the entire casing or they can only just the top part. If they can just replace the top part(which means this will solve the main root to this dispute) then I'll fork out 100% of the cost of changing just the top part. If they said that no choice but have to replace the whole casing. then I proposed that both of us share the whole casing cost as you only claiming the top part not the whole casing and either way, you are still on the gaining side.- p/s: Yes, you too can call the Asus Service Centre after I've get quotation from them should you doubt me. Perhaps you should start calling Asus Service Centre to get a quotation of the housing asap and then we can further discuss about it. I'll try to get the contact number for it and give them a call after you've called them. Do update us here once you've called them. This post has been edited by vikingw2k: Aug 1 2007, 01:03 PM |
|
|
Aug 1 2007, 01:18 PM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
152 posts Joined: Jun 2007 From: Perak |
good luck then viking & TS..
@se7en : ok since the account age means a lot to u, then i wont bother coming here again.. This post has been edited by wandzul: Aug 1 2007, 01:24 PM |
|
|
Aug 1 2007, 01:20 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
478 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Kuantan, PAHANG |
i will stick to my solution, dun offer me ur generousity, be more responsible of what u hv done
|
|
|
Aug 1 2007, 01:32 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,028 posts Joined: Sep 2004 From: KL |
QUOTE(ad_rv4 @ Aug 1 2007, 01:20 PM) i will stick to my solution, dun offer me ur generousity, be more responsible of what u hv done no offense to you, but you are inviting flame. There are limits to peoples patience as well.Do remember what you bought is a USED item, NOT brand new. |
|
|
Aug 1 2007, 01:42 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,138 posts Joined: Dec 2006 |
QUOTE(ad_rv4 @ Aug 1 2007, 01:20 PM) i will stick to my solution, dun offer me ur generousity, be more responsible of what u hv done wow..TS a bit fussy yeah??!! |
|
|
Aug 1 2007, 01:54 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,589 posts Joined: Nov 2004 |
QUOTE(ad_rv4 @ Aug 1 2007, 01:20 PM) i will stick to my solution, dun offer me ur generousity, be more responsible of what u hv done Stick to your solution which means replacing the whole casing OR full refund as in page 1? |
|
|
Aug 1 2007, 02:12 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,236 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: BB Bangi |
QUOTE(ad_rv4 @ Aug 1 2007, 01:20 PM) i will stick to my solution, dun offer me ur generousity, be more responsible of what u hv done bear in mind that u're buying a used item, and a used items means it probably has a few scratches here and there.. and i don't think viking is liable to bear any sort of responsibility for any of the scratches except the crack on top which u too share the responsibility.. be reasonable, u're still pointing fingers on viking in your current post, and posing high as in giving viking chance.. why not put it the other way round then? that viking is offering u a chance to fix the crack? i think both sides bear same responsibilities, so the best is still to avoid those sentences that would pose 1 party higher than another..This post has been edited by kevin613: Aug 1 2007, 02:13 PM |
|
|
Aug 1 2007, 03:09 PM
|
![]()
Junior Member
34 posts Joined: Dec 2006 |
yeah..TS,u bought a 95% like new.not 100% new..everyone hope that this prob will settled a.s.ap...and satisfting to both of u..hope it will not be a longer more
This post has been edited by mindfreak: Aug 1 2007, 03:11 PM |
|
|
Aug 1 2007, 03:33 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,633 posts Joined: Jun 2005 |
QUOTE(ad_rv4 @ Aug 1 2007, 01:20 PM) i will stick to my solution, dun offer me ur generousity, be more responsible of what u hv done He is correcting his mistake (if there's even any) by offering resolutions to you and why are you still so unrelenting about this whole issue? I think it is only fair for Viking to bear half of the cost for changing the complete housing for you.He suggested that if it's possible to change only the top section of the phone, he'd bear the full cost, and I think that itself is pretty damn fair. What else do you want? Just in case it slipped out of your head when you were thinking of more bull to spill, you are buying a used item. No offense, but a finicky buyer like you should have opted for a new one from the shop instead, but since you probably could not afford a new one, then just live with the old saying of "you get what you paid for". I can see that you're being an opportunist and trying to parasite on this whole issue to get him to change the whole housing for you. Your very first complain was about the top part, THEN STICK TO THAT CLAIM. Don't come back a day later and whine about another part, and then few hours later about another crack. Hey, why not abuse the phone for one good year and then claim it on Viking? Please don't go rambling about how he wanted to con you, he offered COD but you couldn't make it to KL. And if his intentions were to make that miserable quick buck from you, he wouldn't be so patient coming back to this thread every single day just to entertain your silly statements. My advise to you is, just swallow the proposition like a man and be done with this issue. If you're going to haggle about it, probably it'd get both of you suspended from this forum and you'd end up with nothing but a damn crack on your phone. Honestly, probably everyone in here can see your true intent which you are trying so hard to disguise behind the initial sympathies thrown at you. But now the tables have turned, so you better go with the flow and just ACCEPT THE DAMN SOLUTION, cause I really think that you'll still be on the winning end. Paying half just to change the whole housing? Heck, it's even a better deal than the MegaSale! Viking offered a resolution. The ball is now in your court. Make your call. Good riddance. Edit: And Se7en, with all due respect, I think it'd be unjustified for you to take action on Viking too if the buyer himself is playing hard to get this issue solved. Viking is offering his options but the buyer is making things difficult for him. From the way the buyer is dickering, it'd be an understatement to even say that this issue will be solved within 24 months. This post has been edited by blinky: Aug 1 2007, 03:44 PM |
|
|
Aug 1 2007, 03:49 PM
|
|
VIP
9,778 posts Joined: Jun 2005 From: KL(Wangsa Maju) , Seremban 2 |
QUOTE(ad_rv4 @ Aug 1 2007, 01:20 PM) i will stick to my solution Could you at least list out clearly what's your fair reasonable proposal and take some effort to explain it to me clearly so that I can understand the reason behind your proposal, if you cant put them in sentence, at least try to put them in a point form so that you don't mix up everything and mislead usQUOTE(ad_rv4 @ Aug 1 2007, 01:20 PM) dun offer me ur generousity, be more responsible of what u hv done You told me to "not to offer my generousity to you, but be more responsible on what I've done?" Obviously your phrase contradicts. All the while I'm here doing my responsibility by taking the effort by replying you in a polite way helping you out to solve this dispute(which actually we would have settle it peacefully via pm IF you could control your emotion a little bit that day instead of hurrying to create a dispute thread happily like this -> What you are gaining from my proposal - Free Top part replacement. (I'll bear 100% of the cost of replacing the Top part since this is the root of this dispute) You don't have to see the damage on the top anymore. - 50% subsidize on the whole casing (IF the entire casing needs to be replaced, and in return you'll get a whole new spanking casing.) This post has been edited by vikingw2k: Aug 1 2007, 04:01 PM |
|
|
Aug 1 2007, 03:54 PM
|
![]()
Newbie
1 posts Joined: Aug 2007 |
TS, you are getting too much; i was observing this threat few days ago i think you are too much
my point for you to consider: 1. you are buying a second hand product, be expected of crack and scratches, be expected! 2. you are so lucky viking willing to share the cost for replacement of a new casing and please be reminded, you are one cunning dude finding his way to get a new pda at second hand price, hence you still wanna torture this fella with your psycho...come on dude, its only 1k++, i spent more than 1k in a week on food! 3. even if you complain to consumer department, you can bet you got nothing to againts viking, he ain't sold you a none functioning pda. i was in the business long before you. 4. it is your own mistake for not setting up a COD session. your own mistake, remember that. you got not case. con or conned, this is what i called "the art of trading". 5. i had been dealing with viking way long before you are a member here, starting from my samsung z500, dallab pda, 6680, notebooks and so on. i found him to be a honest seller. so tak usah la nak main fitnah ala kampung style. and by the way to viking, dude, tolong la sikit, so obvious this dude is trying to get a almost brand new pda by main fitnah. when i said almost brand new; it is similiar to getting functioning product at lower price with brand new case. He got no case on you la dude in terms of consumer law. TS; ko ni psycho la..mentality kampung ko tu ada sikit sikit tak ngam la. So obvious you are not financially strong and yet got a huge mind of wanting the best out of second hand choices. duhhhh tak malu langsung... ok i am done with this account, i am only here to tell off the TS and to provide my own previous experiences dealing with viking back in 2005 till 2006. This post has been edited by pecahdara: Aug 1 2007, 03:58 PM |
|
|
Aug 1 2007, 04:01 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,031 posts Joined: Sep 2006 From: â–▂▃▅▇ Ù©Í¡[à¹Ì¯Í¡à¹]Û¶? |
RV...this is malaysian here....
Tat's the best solution for you already.Take it lar...Coz after this like s7ven said...This case will be review again. U have nothing to lose already lar...U take that solution lar. |
|
|
Aug 1 2007, 04:01 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
7,106 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
QUOTE(ad_rv4 @ Aug 1 2007, 01:20 PM) i will stick to my solution, dun offer me ur generousity, be more responsible of what u hv done So, if viking WILL be willing to change the casing FOC, you'll drop the case? Or would you go on and whine about how there is dead pixel on screen? Or how you will then claim petrol and money + time wasted at RM8 per hour? Maybe psychology distress caused by your students who mocked you for having a scarred Asus PDA? Or how viking tarnished your reputation to the online community?If you had a DOA or serious crack on arrival, then I'll side with you. But considering this is 1) a second hand unit 2)viking accepted blame even with no concrete proof and 3)viking NEVER said that it was a perfectly out of the box spanking new unit, I'd had been prepared for cosmetic scarring of the product. Yes, viking should be blamed for the oversight, but don't even dare to think you do not need to escape any responsibility in this case. I'm sorry if this is harsh, but it's the simple thinking of "hey, if he have a tag, then everything will go well!" that has lead to cheating cases time and time again. Take this as a inexpensive lesson, because if you look around, there are people that have lost more than 3k on some cases because they were trusting. If I was viking, I'll simply take the tag anyhow. I'll divert my potential customers to this thread and I think they will gain more respect for me, instead of losing it looking at how he has approached this problem. |
|
|
Aug 1 2007, 04:06 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
311 posts Joined: Sep 2006 |
time for honest q&a
does seller intend to hide that top serious scratch/blackhole part during picturing them? only seller himself knows. if yes, then best way would be buyer post back to seller, seller refund 100% money back to buyer. settled. if send to asus later maybe got problem like, misshandling during courier, more scratch, missing during courier, seller replace the casing himself (no accuse, just the possiblities), etc more and more problem considering both parties are quite hard to come into one solution, best way is to prevent more possibilities to crops up. the vital point is actually when buyer ask seller for the part of scratch or dented, seller just point it to the thread where the deffects couldn't be cleary seen. dragging this long wouldn't be good for both parties, coz seller might say buyer hold this item for some time alreayd, more scratches or etc. so fast solution would be (imhonest o), seller refund 99% if not 100% to buyer, buyer send back. |
|
|
Aug 1 2007, 04:12 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,633 posts Joined: Jun 2005 |
QUOTE(sleepsleep @ Aug 1 2007, 04:06 PM) time for honest q&a Maybe you should start reading from the start and comprehend every single post first.does seller intend to hide that top serious scratch/blackhole part during picturing them? only seller himself knows. if yes, then best way would be buyer post back to seller, seller refund 100% money back to buyer. settled. if send to asus later maybe got problem like, misshandling during courier, more scratch, missing during courier, seller replace the casing himself (no accuse, just the possiblities), etc more and more problem considering both parties are quite hard to come into one solution, best way is to prevent more possibilities to crops up. the vital point is actually when buyer ask seller for the part of scratch or dented, seller just point it to the thread where the deffects couldn't be cleary seen. dragging this long wouldn't be good for both parties, coz seller might say buyer hold this item for some time alreayd, more scratches or etc. so fast solution would be (imhonest o), seller refund 99% if not 100% to buyer, buyer send back. Maybe you should stop contributing possibilities and what ifs. Maybe you shouldn't suggest that the seller to refund 100% because there's no justification to corroborate your funny claims. Or maybe, just maybe, you shouldn't even post or give your cents at all. |
|
|
Aug 1 2007, 04:13 PM
|
|
VIP
9,778 posts Joined: Jun 2005 From: KL(Wangsa Maju) , Seremban 2 |
sleepsleep,
sorry, but I hope that you don't add anymore "What If scenarios" here. You cant predict the future. Seller has decided to send it by himself to Asus Service Center, reason is because he wanted to learn how to use it as he mentioned earlier on that he's new in phone(out of sudden got interest to learn). Since he said he'll send it to Asus, no mishandling will occur via courier, no extra scratch, no missing via courier and No what if bla bla bla. Thanks. QUOTE(ad_rv4 @ Aug 1 2007, 08:41 AM) 4. i will go on my own to ASUS CENTRE to replace the casing, so next time i know the place, i ask the people there anything about the PDA, that's the better way i learn of my ASUS P525, im still learning using PDA.. This post has been edited by vikingw2k: Aug 1 2007, 04:16 PM |
|
|
Aug 1 2007, 04:20 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
615 posts Joined: Feb 2005 |
From what I have read the buyer aka as TS seems to be pushing the seller as he knows that he has nothing to lose while the seller which is Viking has a lot to lose (such as his Elite tag and Trade enforcer tag).
To balance the scale I think that if the buyer consistently acts hard to please it is only fair that his real details such as name, IC, address be made known so that future sellers will be vary when dealing with him. It is easy to create new accounts but its hard to fake the real name. Lets have a level playing field. |
|
|
Aug 1 2007, 04:24 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
311 posts Joined: Sep 2006 |
hopefully everything will go smooth to viking and ts.
|
|
|
Aug 1 2007, 04:44 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,017 posts Joined: Jun 2006 From: Georgetown, Penang |
QUOTE(flamer @ Aug 1 2007, 04:20 PM) From what I have read the buyer aka as TS seems to be pushing the seller as he knows that he has nothing to lose while the seller which is Viking has a lot to lose (such as his Elite tag and Trade enforcer tag). Honestly, Viking has nothing to worry about his tags because this is not a con case, willing buyer, willing seller. When Viking asked TS to refer to the pictures when he asked about the PDA's condition, he could have requested for more clearer pictures from Viking if he was doubtful about anything instead of concluding the deal in a rush and make a big hoo hah out of it now. Do take note that this is an used item, some scratches and imperfections are pretty normal. If you buy an used car, if the owner tells you that his car is accident free, I'm sure you don't expect the car's paintwork to be of showroom condition because it's accident free.To balance the scale I think that if the buyer consistently acts hard to please it is only fair that his real details such as name, IC, address be made known so that future sellers will be vary when dealing with him. It is easy to create new accounts but its hard to fake the real name. Lets have a level playing field. Viking has offered a sensible solution to you and I can frankly tell you that no other sellers here will be willing to replace the casing for you since cosmetic imperfections don't affect the functionality of the PDA. I suggest that you just accept whatever Viking has proposed to you. He has been very sincere to solve this matter with you unless of course, if you have a hidden agenda. |
|
|
Aug 1 2007, 06:52 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
15,278 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
wow, viking sure has a mad buyer on his hands; if it was me, i'll just kick his nuts for being such a pain in the arse.
the terms and conditions are too stiff to be true. as a buyer, what have you got to gain from all that? it's just a scratch, you'll get more the longer you own it, grow up. |
|
|
Aug 1 2007, 07:00 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,625 posts Joined: Dec 2005 |
» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... « Huh? You just joined today...Have any extra account? Why creating account when you can use the previous one? BTW, just to highlight your 1k thing. IT IS NOT A SMALL AMOUNT. If it is, then please pay buyer to replace the casing, since RM1XX is only going to cost you 1 day food. Im not supporting seller nor buyer, but I felt that the highlight is illogical. Most of them are still struggling hard to maintain with 1K This post has been edited by ViRaViRa: Aug 1 2007, 07:02 PM |
|
|
Aug 1 2007, 07:03 PM
|
|
Elite
5,434 posts Joined: Dec 2006 |
QUOTE(ViRaViRa @ Aug 1 2007, 07:00 PM) » Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... « Huh? You just joined today...Have any extra account? Why creating account when you can use the previous one? BTW, just to highlight your 1k thing. IT IS NOT A SMALL AMOUNT. If it is, then please pay buyer to replace the casing, since RM1XX is only going to cost you 1 day food. Im not supporting seller nor buyer, but I felt that the highlight is illogical. Most of them are still struggling hard to maintain with 1K ,the TS is really troublesome....pity Viking to have such this kind of buyer. anyway,how much the casing cost?got update? This post has been edited by AceCombat: Aug 1 2007, 07:07 PM |
|
|
Aug 1 2007, 07:06 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,378 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Miri,Sarawak,Malaysia Status: Dead! |
You don't want to know. Its a three.
|
|
|
Aug 1 2007, 07:10 PM
|
![]()
Newbie
1 posts Joined: Aug 2007 |
QUOTE(ViRaViRa @ Aug 1 2007, 08:00 PM) » Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... « Huh? You just joined today...Have any extra account? Why creating account when you can use the previous one? BTW, just to highlight your 1k thing. IT IS NOT A SMALL AMOUNT. If it is, then please pay buyer to replace the casing, since RM1XX is only going to cost you 1 day food. Im not supporting seller nor buyer, but I felt that the highlight is illogical. Most of them are still struggling hard to maintain with 1K psssss....go out with gf, dating, movie, dinners(unless you had your meals with your gf in mamak stall), gifts, flowers, petrol, sometime might wanna have sex in a 5 star hotel, dun you spoil ur gf with any gift while shopping? i dun know about you, but i do. anyway, tq for my responding to my post. Added on August 1, 2007, 7:12 pm QUOTE(AceCombat @ Aug 1 2007, 08:03 PM) haha.....u said what i wanna say,joined today but got a lot of deal liao aiii, i used to be active here few years back; until this recently found viking in an arse burning issue, might well just share some real life trading experiences that i had before with him. my previous accounts all banned due to my extreme rudy part. and by the way, gees you assume too much.,the TS is really troublesome....pity Viking to have such this kind of buyer. anyway,how much the casing cost?got update? This post has been edited by pecahdara: Aug 1 2007, 07:18 PM |
|
|
Aug 1 2007, 07:20 PM
|
![]()
Newbie
3 posts Joined: Apr 2007 |
QUOTE(pecahdara @ Aug 1 2007, 03:54 PM) TS, you are getting too much; i was observing this threat few days ago i think you are too much u spend RM 10XX + on food in a week = x 4 = > RM 4000 a month just 4 food 4 1 person....wat do u eat? gold?my point for you to consider: 1. you are buying a second hand product, be expected of crack and scratches, be expected! 2. you are so lucky viking willing to share the cost for replacement of a new casing and please be reminded, you are one cunning dude finding his way to get a new pda at second hand price, hence you still wanna torture this fella with your psycho...come on dude, its only 1k++, i spent more than 1k in a week on food! 3. even if you complain to consumer department, you can bet you got nothing to againts viking, he ain't sold you a none functioning pda. i was in the business long before you. 4. it is your own mistake for not setting up a COD session. your own mistake, remember that. you got not case. con or conned, this is what i called "the art of trading". 5. i had been dealing with viking way long before you are a member here, starting from my samsung z500, dallab pda, 6680, notebooks and so on. i found him to be a honest seller. so tak usah la nak main fitnah ala kampung style. and by the way to viking, dude, tolong la sikit, so obvious this dude is trying to get a almost brand new pda by main fitnah. when i said almost brand new; it is similiar to getting functioning product at lower price with brand new case. He got no case on you la dude in terms of consumer law. TS; ko ni psycho la..mentality kampung ko tu ada sikit sikit tak ngam la. So obvious you are not financially strong and yet got a huge mind of wanting the best out of second hand choices. duhhhh tak malu langsung... ok i am done with this account, i am only here to tell off the TS and to provide my own previous experiences dealing with viking back in 2005 till 2006. |
|
|
Aug 1 2007, 07:23 PM
|
![]()
Newbie
1 posts Joined: Aug 2007 |
QUOTE(GeneralMaximus @ Aug 1 2007, 08:20 PM) u spend RM 10XX + on food in a week = x 4 = > RM 4000 a month just 4 food 4 1 person....wat do u eat? gold? do i have to put in all the details how i spent 1k on food? or next time i should say, i eat with my gf, with bf, with my uncles, with my aunties, with my gf plus her family, lunch at bayu, dinner at smokehouse, before left the place, tar pao some red whine, some white wine, do i have to say all this? do i have to be that details???? gees man, is like i have to report back to dad how i spend my study allowance lehhh 18 years back...last edit before i cabut, you really wanna see how is life spending like crazy, making good income, you can come and work for me after 2007, i need sales consultant for my software house. This post has been edited by pecahdara: Aug 1 2007, 07:30 PM |
|
|
Aug 1 2007, 07:31 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
920 posts Joined: Jun 2005 |
Viking?case haven't solve ar??
edi got solution good good edi wo !! y still belum proceed with buyer geh...this thread got no use jor..now ppl "guan sui "onli la ~ hehe |
|
|
Aug 1 2007, 07:54 PM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
64 posts Joined: Mar 2005 |
1stly, no intention to spam here..
Viking is a nice trader here, i second tht. Viking agreed to bare 50% of the cost of replacing a housing, when it could be possible tht buyer caused additional scratches to it during this period, tht seems reasonable to me. Yet TS kept pushing Viking all the way to the wall, not to mention creating duplicate account to flame. Thts not very nice thing to do dude.. Try to solve the issue, dont add any oil to it la k?? Peace |
|
|
Aug 1 2007, 09:30 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
5,417 posts Joined: May 2006 From: Bear Hill, Malacca |
» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... « i believe it is much better for ts and viking alone to discuss in this thread rather than someone bragging about how he spend his money in here. they are almost to an agreement already. what's the big fuss? if viking is your friend, and you believe him so much... you should also believe that he did nothing wrong then why worry so much about what other people say about him? and ts, don't push it too far ok? |
|
|
Aug 1 2007, 09:49 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,967 posts Joined: May 2006 |
well i bought stuff from viking jugak last time
and almost twice we had a miscommunication on 2 different stuffs but things settled now seriously viking, u really need to change ur T&C, they suck haha anyways, i went to viking house last 2 weeks i think to check out the proc i wanna buy and the ASUS pda was ok...i even held in it my own hands but my info is really superficial cuz i never really observed the stuffs at the side overall they look and feel ok no scratches on the screen or any bende tercabut whatsoever haha |
|
|
Aug 1 2007, 10:09 PM
|
|
VIP
9,778 posts Joined: Jun 2005 From: KL(Wangsa Maju) , Seremban 2 |
ad_rv4 - I'm yet to receive any reply from you regarding this. Could you speak up and let us know what's your plan? Let's not waste anymore time. Settle this for once and for all.
QUOTE(AceCombat @ Aug 1 2007, 07:03 PM) the TS is really troublesome....pity Viking to have such this kind of buyer. anyway,how much the casing cost?got update? ingjoo - Behave yourself instead of whining like a little girl here. This post has been edited by vikingw2k: Aug 1 2007, 11:57 PM |
|
|
Aug 1 2007, 11:55 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
920 posts Joined: Jun 2005 |
Viking , i think u should state a dateline for the deal la!!
later it takes forever for TS to think then how o ? forever no deal kah ?? y now TS so silent? all this while , he is so worry , so emotional due to the phone ?? hope you can deal it asap yah^^ peace^^ |
|
|
Aug 1 2007, 11:59 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,028 posts Joined: Sep 2004 From: KL |
He was last online 9.19pm today
|
|
|
Aug 2 2007, 12:17 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,008 posts Joined: Mar 2006 From: Kuantan Pahang |
have to give TS for some time to think
tomolo with no answer only think put some deadline |
|
|
Aug 2 2007, 12:18 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,625 posts Joined: Dec 2005 |
QUOTE(pecahdara @ Aug 1 2007, 07:10 PM) well i am sorry to know that 1k is such a huge amount for you, it could be either you are still student or an average joe working as a clerk and had never show any progress in career life or anything whatever, anyway, why should i pay for the TS? 1 day food? where in world i make that statement and please do not add words to my mouth. i was insulting him happily and you asked me to pay for him? dude get real, no free lunch in this world(i guess you are the type that day dreaming about free stuffs instead of working harder to show your self 1k is merely nothing! raising a kid can cost you 1 k, 8 days of dating with your gf can cost nearly 1k) and by the way, are you my boy friend? gay boyfriend? les girlfriend? girl friend? why must you be so curious about my previous accounts? you are asking me as like a husband asking the wife "ehh, malam malam mau pergi mana?" geeeesssss disgusting Haha, I had a good laugh reading your reply. You must be a joker. BTW, you are the one who said 1k is not big for you. Then why talk big? 2 words for you - Shut up.psssss....go out with gf, dating, movie, dinners(unless you had your meals with your gf in mamak stall), gifts, flowers, petrol, sometime might wanna have sex in a 5 star hotel, dun you spoil ur gf with any gift while shopping? i dun know about you, but i do. anyway, tq for my responding to my post. Added on August 1, 2007, 7:12 pm aiii, i used to be active here few years back; until this recently found viking in an arse burning issue, might well just share some real life trading experiences that i had before with him. my previous accounts all banned due to my extreme rudy part. and by the way, gees you assume too much. Because your "1k is a small amount" is not contributing anything here unless you are willing to pay TS. » Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... « Hopefully Viking can solve this matter as soon as possible with TS. This post has been edited by ViRaViRa: Aug 2 2007, 12:21 AM |
|
|
Aug 2 2007, 12:26 AM
|
|
VIP
9,778 posts Joined: Jun 2005 From: KL(Wangsa Maju) , Seremban 2 |
QUOTE(ViRaViRa @ Aug 2 2007, 12:18 AM) Hopefully Viking can solve this matter as soon as possible with TS. Thanks QUOTE(taxidoor @ Aug 2 2007, 12:17 AM) have to give TS for some time to think Still waiting for his reply, yes, I'm giving him more time to consider, not gonna push him too hardtomolo with no answer only think put some deadline This post has been edited by vikingw2k: Aug 2 2007, 12:28 AM |
|
|
Aug 2 2007, 12:28 AM
|
|
VIP
673 posts Joined: Jan 2006 From: The Kitchenette™ Status: In Wub ♥™ |
Topic title edited for clarity.
Added on August 2, 2007, 1:03 am QUOTE(ingjoo @ Aug 1 2007, 07:38 PM) if like that i want TAGS also lah, like a SuperStar go supermarket steal stuff, casier saw it and report, Superstar juz explain thought someone will pay for him, then owner say no problem. If other people, already call police lo, want explain go tell police. Your post has been removed for posting irrelevant comments regarding the dispute.New phone (Market Price=RM2000 , 2nd Hand=RM1500 , Cracks=RM800) with TAGS, i can buy "dropped" phone with CRACKS at RM800, take nice photo saw 99% new, sell at RM1300, earn RM500. When buyer complain, then say change casing, pay RM150 (50% only), still earn RM350... I WANT TAGSS~~~ hehe, my 2 cents, well just for everyone to think of it. and can vikingw2k answer me? If you want to request tags, do it in the Helpdesk forum. This post has been edited by altie: Aug 2 2007, 01:03 AM |
|
|
Aug 2 2007, 06:18 AM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
156 posts Joined: Oct 2006 |
Seller & Buyer can come to PhoneStar Communication Sdn Bhd.
Dealer's price for changing to 100%new housing around rm230.I can try to get both of ya d Dealer's price.(they r my frind:-)but cant guarnty!), No need to chang 100% new housing.i think just change d front face &back cover only.keypad,jjoystick,vol+-,camra button,Voice Comand button,Power button,Hold button no need to change buyer-40%/seller 60% |
|
|
Aug 2 2007, 08:19 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
478 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Kuantan, PAHANG |
seller replace the cost of changing back+front casing and i forget what u hv done, u no need to responsible of what happened during the process, juz next time show ur responsibility for ur future buyers
thanks for all the supports This post has been edited by ad_rv4: Aug 2 2007, 08:54 AM |
|
|
Aug 2 2007, 09:24 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,589 posts Joined: Nov 2004 |
QUOTE(ad_rv4 @ Aug 2 2007, 08:19 AM) seller replace the cost of changing back+front casing and i forget what u hv done, u no need to responsible of what happened during the process, juz next time show ur responsibility for ur future buyers It's good that you're happier now. thanks for all the supports Great to know that case is solved. |
|
|
Aug 2 2007, 09:30 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,658 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
finally solve..heheh
|
|
|
Aug 2 2007, 09:35 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,236 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: BB Bangi |
QUOTE(suiteng @ Aug 2 2007, 09:24 AM) case solved??viking agreed to give him front and back cover replacement already? he is just asking, i haven't see viking agreeing yet.. viking proposed 50-50 for the cost of replacing the front+back no? viking's last proposal only mentioned bearing 100% of the housing if it only involves replacing just the top. in the case of replacing the front+back is almost replacing the entire housing that is covering the surface of the phone already. i can only see he's not willing to bear a wee bit of responsibility at all, and still trying to push everything onto viking even with his last post.. hinting that viking is at wrong, and he's giving chance.. anyway we sure learn a lot from this thread, and we knew who is responsible and who is not, and we shall know who to avoid in future.. viking should make his T&C clearer next time, especially about the fussy buyer part.. lol.. This post has been edited by kevin613: Aug 2 2007, 10:24 AM |
|
|
Aug 2 2007, 10:21 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
885 posts Joined: Mar 2006 From: Johor Bahru |
QUOTE(ad_rv4 @ Aug 2 2007, 08:19 AM) seller replace the cost of changing back+front casing and i forget what u hv done, u no need to responsible of what happened during the process, juz next time show ur responsibility for ur future buyers yeah... i learn something... and that is not to have any business relation with u or watsoeverthanks for all the supports |
|
|
Aug 2 2007, 10:22 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,008 posts Joined: Mar 2006 From: Kuantan Pahang |
if the qoutation of lacostedefalcone RM230 is correct
so would be RM230 / 2 (Top + down) = RM115 RM115 / 2 = RM62.5 share between buyer and seller |
|
|
Aug 2 2007, 11:19 AM
|
|
Admin
1,806 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Captain's Cabin, Black Pearl |
We're considering this dispute as solved. TS and buyer, please conclude the remainder of this dispute via PM.
TS, if you still require this topic to be reopened, please PM me or any member of the moderating team. |
|
|
Aug 4 2007, 12:08 AM
|
|
VIP
9,778 posts Joined: Jun 2005 From: KL(Wangsa Maju) , Seremban 2 |
Below are the follow ups of our dispute via PM.
» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... « Thread Closed - Dispute Solved p/s: I would like to apologize if I've unintentionally offended anybody during the dispute resolving process. Hope that you guys don't take it too personally, also million thanks to those who've contributed your fruitful comments and suggestions throughout this dispute This post has been edited by vikingw2k: Aug 4 2007, 12:10 AM |
|
Topic ClosedOptions
|
| Change to: | 0.1489sec
0.64
6 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 23rd December 2025 - 02:09 AM |