QUOTE(vikingw2k @ Jul 29 2007, 11:59 PM)
As you can see here, he did asked me which part is scratches, I've answered his question by telling him to refer to the picture for the overall view as i believe my picture could tell him almost the overall condition of the phone. If he asked me for more pictures of the scratches, I would have snap pictures of all the scratches just like what i did in my deals before this.
p/s: Please do not ask me why i didn't upload the picture of top part of my phone, I've mentioned on my earlier post. Usually I'll only snap 6 pictures which is Left, Right, Back, Front, Full Set, Hand. I've no intention to leave the Top nor the Bottom. Don't use that as a lame excuse to accuse me of trying to skip the top part.
Bro, when you got it from previous owner, you asked him about the crack on the top. Why? Because it was obviously ugly to have such a big crack which got into your attention. p/s: Please do not ask me why i didn't upload the picture of top part of my phone, I've mentioned on my earlier post. Usually I'll only snap 6 pictures which is Left, Right, Back, Front, Full Set, Hand. I've no intention to leave the Top nor the Bottom. Don't use that as a lame excuse to accuse me of trying to skip the top part.
But how come when you sell the PDA, it was not mentioned clearly? You should know that others will realise about the crack as how u realised it. So you should have mentioned about the crack IN DETAIL/CLEARLY.
You didn't do it & just asked TS to refer to the photo where the crack is not snapped. It's definitely unethical.
2ndly, you did mention that there are many other buyers who saw your phone & agreed that it looked new. So are you trying to say that the crack was that obvious when you shipped the PDA? It clearly contradict with your conversation with previous owner of the PDA.
This post has been edited by ViRaViRa: Jul 30 2007, 12:09 AM
Jul 30 2007, 12:07 AM

Quote
0.0330sec
0.66
7 queries
GZIP Disabled