Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

102 Pages « < 70 71 72 73 74 > » Bottom

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 Q6600 Overclock and Temperature

views
     
iBenQ
post Dec 5 2008, 05:36 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,550 posts

Joined: Aug 2008


err.. i wanna ask something... does stock vcore = VID???
pl4tinum
post Dec 5 2008, 07:20 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
218 posts

Joined: Oct 2008
From: Kuching


hi guys, jus wondering if you could shed some light on a little problem i have. In terms of lapping, the ultimate goal is to get a mirror shine surface?
Dickong
post Dec 6 2008, 06:46 AM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,689 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
QUOTE(pl4tinum @ Dec 5 2008, 07:20 PM)
hi guys, jus wondering if you could shed some light on a little problem i have. In terms of lapping, the ultimate goal is to get a mirror shine surface?
*
The important thing of lapping is to make sure the full contact of the heatsink n the ihs from the proc, not necessary to have a mirror shine finish becos it doesnt give much different than a non mirror shine, again the purpose of lapping is to make sure there is no concave or convex between the two surface.
k!nex
post Dec 6 2008, 01:50 PM

Restless stars
*******
Senior Member
3,389 posts

Joined: Mar 2007
From: KL


QUOTE(iBenQ @ Dec 5 2008, 05:36 PM)
err.. i wanna ask something... does stock vcore = VID???
*
yes. and every Q6600 VID is different.example: my current Q6600 VID is 1.275v, and maybe urs is 1.3v.
-=ProtozuaqS=-
post Dec 6 2008, 03:33 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
164 posts

Joined: Sep 2007



QUOTE(k!nex @ Dec 4 2008, 04:01 PM)
shhh..those stuff, cannot mention here.illegal.
btw, do u really need to raise ur vcore to 1.3 to get 3ghz?? mine around 1.18v at load can run 100 times of IBT without error already. maybe u up 0.1V for ur VTT and try lower ur vcore. vtt must not be more than 1.5 to be safe.stock vtt for Q6600 is 1.2v.

from wat i observe, its true tht during minimal load, ur cpu speed goes down and ur vcore also. dis is the same concept as laptop processors.
*
i know & will not tell anyone about the illegal trick. tongue.gif tongue.gif

bout vcore,i tried to lower it to 1.2v and after 5 minutes stressing,failure appeared.i will try ur suggestion bout lower the vcore and up the vtt.
there are some options on P5Q BIOS Ai Tweaker that find hard to catch up.
iBenQ
post Dec 6 2008, 04:27 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,550 posts

Joined: Aug 2008


QUOTE(k!nex @ Dec 6 2008, 01:50 PM)
yes. and every Q6600 VID is different.example: my current Q6600 VID is 1.275v, and maybe urs is 1.3v.
*
icic... yes mine is 1.3vid... but according to sites, a 1.3vid means i need 1.3 to run 2.4ghz with stability... but with just 1.272 i can run 3.2ghz de lor... 1.3 definitely can go 3.3 or maybe even 3.4ghz @@... so does this mean i can say my proc can run @ 3.3ghz on stock vcore????
-=ProtozuaqS=-
post Dec 6 2008, 05:05 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
164 posts

Joined: Sep 2007



QUOTE(iBenQ @ Dec 6 2008, 04:27 PM)
icic... yes mine is 1.3vid... but according to sites, a 1.3vid means i need 1.3 to run 2.4ghz with stability... but with just 1.272 i can run 3.2ghz de lor... 1.3 definitely can go 3.3 or maybe even 3.4ghz @@... so does this mean i can say my proc can run @ 3.3ghz on stock vcore????
*
what the shock?huhu.
some people tells that CPU-Z is the worse app to calibrate the temperature. i dont know why they said that,but i notice that
cpu-z state and bios state is different.that's coz of vdroop right?
and mine,with C1E enable,i got 1.136v default vcore.
with the differences of Q6600 VID,it's so hard to OC by adapt what people have been achieved,unless we try it by own.

This post has been edited by -=ProtozuaqS=-: Dec 6 2008, 05:06 PM
Silverfire
post Dec 6 2008, 06:43 PM

Cruxiaer
*******
Senior Member
4,947 posts

Joined: Nov 2007



There are chances, but some times even if your proc comes with low VID and everything it doesn't mean you can surely get excellent clocks with low vcore.
jetyap
post Dec 6 2008, 08:16 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
168 posts

Joined: Sep 2004
From: PJ, SS2, Selangor


Hmm, I'm running 3.2GHz at 1.2V. Q6600 G0, 400 X 8 atm...still testing for stability. But one thing I notice is that at idle, the vcore is 1.23V but during load is 1.20V.

So which one is the one to consider? At idle or at load?
Dickong
post Dec 6 2008, 08:29 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,689 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
QUOTE(Silverfire @ Dec 6 2008, 06:43 PM)
There are chances, but some times even if your proc comes with low VID and everything it doesn't mean you can surely get excellent clocks with low vcore.
*
I agree with your statement, just like mine i have to put the voltage to 1.325 to get 3.2g stable n mine vid is 1.275 only, suppose to have lower v core volatage, but sometime the culprit might be the mobo.

This post has been edited by Dickong: Dec 6 2008, 08:32 PM
Silverfire
post Dec 7 2008, 02:22 AM

Cruxiaer
*******
Senior Member
4,947 posts

Joined: Nov 2007



QUOTE(jetyap @ Dec 6 2008, 08:16 PM)
Hmm, I'm running 3.2GHz at 1.2V. Q6600 G0, 400 X 8 atm...still testing for stability. But one thing I notice is that at idle, the vcore is 1.23V but during load is 1.20V.

So which one is the one to consider? At idle or at load?
*
During load. When load, there's a feature called vdroop so that sudden current of voltages wont burst your processor...

Correct me if I'm wrong flex.gif
cscheat
post Dec 8 2008, 08:55 AM

V.V.I.P member
******
Senior Member
1,262 posts

Joined: Aug 2005
From: Mars


QUOTE(jetyap @ Dec 6 2008, 09:16 PM)
Hmm, I'm running 3.2GHz at 1.2V. Q6600 G0, 400 X 8 atm...still testing for stability. But one thing I notice is that at idle, the vcore is 1.23V but during load is 1.20V.

So which one is the one to consider? At idle or at load?
*
do a VDROP MOD
tech3910
post Dec 8 2008, 09:03 AM

Anonymous
*******
Senior Member
5,644 posts

Joined: Feb 2008
From: Heaven to HELL


the vcore question really depends on mobo manufacture bios as well.

like gigabyte, even if i enable the loadline calibration, the vcore will still jump up & down during 100% load.
the real stable vcore is actually lower den wat i set in bios.

asus is the other hand has stable vcore.

edited:
testing my q6600 wit gigabyte x38-ds5 F6 bios

setting: 400*8 @3200Mhz, stress test wit IBT

its kinda weird.
the vcore i set on bios is 1.3, in os, the actual vcore jump between 1.248 - 1.264 @ idle.
during 100% wit IBT, its stable @ 1.232

This post has been edited by tech3910: Dec 8 2008, 09:40 AM
iBenQ
post Dec 8 2008, 04:30 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,550 posts

Joined: Aug 2008


hmmm... forget liao my vcore during load when at 3.2ghz,, but i think its around 1.25 during load... now @ 3.6ghz 1.424 idle n 1.392 on linx... set 1.45v at bios, n its the best settings i can go so far... will increasing nb voltage allow me to put lower vcore for my proc???
cscheat
post Dec 8 2008, 07:51 PM

V.V.I.P member
******
Senior Member
1,262 posts

Joined: Aug 2005
From: Mars


QUOTE(iBenQ @ Dec 8 2008, 05:30 PM)
hmmm... forget liao my vcore during load when at 3.2ghz,, but i think its around 1.25 during load... now @ 3.6ghz 1.424 idle n 1.392 on linx... set 1.45v at bios, n its the best settings i can go so far... will increasing nb voltage allow me to put lower vcore for my proc???
*
no no no ! increasing NB voltage unless u are not stable with 2 or more sticks of rams !!!
iBenQ
post Dec 8 2008, 08:28 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,550 posts

Joined: Aug 2008


icic... my bad >"<... but if i wan to go 2000fsb, its recommended for me to increase nb voltage??
-=ProtozuaqS=-
post Dec 8 2008, 10:09 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
164 posts

Joined: Sep 2007



can someone telling me,when we sholud up CPU PLL and GTL reference voltage?
and on Asus board which one was act as RAM divider,FSB Strap to Northbridge or DRAM Freq?

This post has been edited by -=ProtozuaqS=-: Dec 8 2008, 10:10 PM
Silverfire
post Dec 8 2008, 10:26 PM

Cruxiaer
*******
Senior Member
4,947 posts

Joined: Nov 2007



QUOTE(iBenQ @ Dec 8 2008, 08:28 PM)
icic... my bad >"<... but if i wan to go 2000fsb, its recommended for me to increase nb voltage??
*
1.33vmch works for me with 2k FSB for E8200. Stable throughout any tests.
k!nex
post Dec 9 2008, 06:10 PM

Restless stars
*******
Senior Member
3,389 posts

Joined: Mar 2007
From: KL


for quads, above 425fsb need up Vmch abit already.u all consider very lucky to hv a good mobo.my current gigabyte vdrop is horrible. idle 1.284v.load will be 1.21v. my bios vcore setting is 1.34v like dat.
sagittaru
post Dec 11 2008, 04:04 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
140 posts

Joined: Apr 2007


Core 2 Quad 6600 Kentsfield 2.4GHz 1066FSB
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx...N82E16819115017

OCed to:
Clock: 3.00GHz
FSB: 1333
Vcore: 1.35
Temp: 55C-62C w/ stock fan/cooler
----------------------
Qs:
1. Should I decrease my CPU voltage to 1.325 or 1.3? Or others?
Since I've seen you guys running OCed 3.0GHz @ lower than 1.35V.

3. How long will my CPU last if I overclock like this and use it daily basis? hmm.gif
-----------------------

*This is the 1st time I am doing overclock

This post has been edited by sagittaru: Dec 11 2008, 04:05 AM


Attached thumbnail(s)
Attached Image

102 Pages « < 70 71 72 73 74 > » Top
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0315sec    0.70    6 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 12th December 2025 - 12:01 AM