Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 Q6600 Overclock and Temperature

views
     
SUSjoe_star
post Jan 29 2010, 08:32 AM

Serving the Servants
******
Senior Member
1,810 posts

Joined: Mar 2007
My noob OC with Q6600

Proc: Intel Q6600 G0 with Tuniq Tower 120
Mobo: Abit IP35-E (bios 18)
Ram: Crucial Ballistix Tracer 2x1GB

user posted image

Never OC-ed this proc before cos my mobo bios didnt support it. Just flashed to bios 18 and it works very well smile.gif. Vdroop is quite bad though. I have to set 1.42V in the bios to compensate for vdrop+vdroop on full load. Is it bad for the proc in the long run? Gonna try improving memory timings next, although i dont think my memory can do much better sad.gif

This post has been edited by joe_star: Jan 29 2010, 08:35 AM
jeopardise
post Jan 31 2010, 10:23 AM

tidak memberi seketul tahi!
******
Senior Member
1,767 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Bandar Seri Putra


1.42v is good as long as you cool it sufficiently.

My system need to supply 1.45V to overclock to 3.6GHz.
pl4tinum
post Jan 31 2010, 06:43 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
218 posts

Joined: Oct 2008
From: Kuching


1.45v for 3.6 is still okay ler. My old q6600 at 1.44 was 3.4ghz max. For 3.6 during my early testing time, needed 1.56 vcore to get there.
jeopardise
post Feb 1 2010, 09:58 PM

tidak memberi seketul tahi!
******
Senior Member
1,767 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Bandar Seri Putra


Do you know how to tweak RAM a bit?

I understand the timing 5-5-5-15 for my Crucial Tracer 1066MHz.

I wanna tweak a bit the tRFC value which I didn't fully understand how to tweak that. I've googled for that but got very little info. Now info to calculate the optimal value for it.

Attached Image

I wanna run at DDR800 so the optimal setting for it is 4-4-4-12

In my case its 52 clock as in this screenshot. The value stays 52 even I set to 800MHz or 1066MHz

I've tried 34 clock. It runs, but after 20 minute my PC crashed.

Any explaination? Why the value so big? If i reduce it, my RAM faster or improve stability or what?

This post has been edited by jeopardise: Feb 1 2010, 10:02 PM
SUSjoe_star
post Feb 2 2010, 08:28 PM

Serving the Servants
******
Senior Member
1,810 posts

Joined: Mar 2007
Iinm, the first 4 values make the biggest impact on performance. The others are used to get that little bit extra out of your ram. There lots of settings to play with. Try downloading Memset n exploring abit.
monsh
post Feb 12 2010, 01:38 AM

Let's Change The World !
*******
Senior Member
4,196 posts

Joined: Oct 2007


been using Q6600 for the last 3 years and still kicking .
actually started showing degrading T_T
prime not stable but gaming still stable .
so i just leave mine at 3.6ghz .
too lazy to bump more vCore .
and too sad to see my OC goes lower .
cry.gif

will move on to i7 next project ^^,
uzairi
post Feb 22 2010, 01:29 PM

Team almostthere
*******
Senior Member
6,744 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: World Wide Web Status: Banned



QUOTE(joe_star @ Jan 29 2010, 08:32 AM)
My noob OC with Q6600

Proc: Intel Q6600 G0 with Tuniq Tower 120
Mobo: Abit IP35-E (bios 18)
Ram: Crucial Ballistix Tracer 2x1GB

user posted image

Never OC-ed this proc before cos my mobo bios didnt support it. Just flashed to bios 18 and it works very well smile.gif. Vdroop is quite bad though. I have to set 1.42V in the bios to compensate for vdrop+vdroop on full load. Is it bad for the proc in the long run? Gonna try improving memory timings next, although i dont think my memory can do much better sad.gif
*
try to use Linx or IBT bro, that would be much better in stressing the proc and test its stability. OCCT are meant for whole system stability iinm smile.gif

QUOTE(monsh @ Feb 12 2010, 01:38 AM)
been using Q6600 for the last 3 years and still kicking .
actually started showing degrading T_T
prime not stable but gaming still stable .
so i just leave mine at 3.6ghz .
too lazy to bump more vCore .
and too sad to see my OC goes lower .
cry.gif

will move on to i7 next project ^^,
*
LOL

try adding some vcore to see if its stable again or not, it might be your rams degrading too hmm.gif

faizal87
post Feb 24 2010, 05:13 PM

piko piko pong pong
******
Senior Member
1,384 posts

Joined: Jan 2007
From: shah alam@ ampang



» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «



it should be 24 right?52 quite a bit number
try using soft memset to change it
» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «
mADmAN
post Feb 24 2010, 05:55 PM

10k Club
********
All Stars
10,530 posts

Joined: Nov 2004
From: Petaling Jaya & Mid Valley


damn envious seeing Q6600s touching 3.6

max im getting prime stable is 385*9....390*9 and its not prime stable but gaming and other usage no issues...

wanna get 400*9 to get 3.6 and 1:1 with muh rams...but cant sad.gif dunno why...n dunno wat to do sad.gif

vcore already at 1.45
tech3910
post Feb 24 2010, 07:01 PM

Anonymous
*******
Senior Member
5,644 posts

Joined: Feb 2008
From: Heaven to HELL


QUOTE(mADmAN @ Feb 24 2010, 05:55 PM)
damn envious seeing Q6600s touching 3.6

max im getting prime stable is 385*9....390*9 and its not prime stable but gaming and other usage no issues...

wanna get 400*9 to get 3.6 and 1:1 with muh rams...but cant sad.gif dunno why...n dunno wat to do sad.gif

vcore already at 1.45
*
som mobo, there hav a fsb loophole....
where no matter wat u do, the fsb wont stable @ dat certain range.....

try something like 450*8
mADmAN
post Feb 24 2010, 07:08 PM

10k Club
********
All Stars
10,530 posts

Joined: Nov 2004
From: Petaling Jaya & Mid Valley


450*8 would bring my rams up to 900mhz right?

dont think id want that though....them corsair gaming rams arent really OC friendly if i remember correctly...

This post has been edited by mADmAN: Feb 24 2010, 07:08 PM
tech3910
post Feb 24 2010, 08:37 PM

Anonymous
*******
Senior Member
5,644 posts

Joined: Feb 2008
From: Heaven to HELL


QUOTE(mADmAN @ Feb 24 2010, 07:08 PM)
450*8 would bring my rams up to 900mhz right?

dont think id want that though....them corsair gaming rams arent really OC friendly if i remember correctly...
*
even value ddr800 can do 900.
just loosen the timing, pump more voltage.

 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0172sec    0.98    6 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 5th December 2025 - 05:08 AM