May 23 2020, 02:50 PM
QUOTE(Candy12 @ May 23 2020, 01:24 PM)
Whether it's NTT Asia, Telstra-REACH or whatever they all still need to route through HKG as a major transit point before crossing the Pacific to reach USA.
Is there a route that directly crosses the Pacific from SG without transiting through HK/GUAM/Japan first?
The only cable that can achieve this is through Telin's SEA-US cable which is meant for Indonesia.
AAG is the only major cable which is used by both NTT MSC(Maxis) and TM to transit to HK before crossing the Pacific.
Peering does not help much because when there's a surge of bandwidth requirement, your peering partners will always throttle you to avoid their own networks from being affected by your congestion.
There is 2 different things to differentiate here. Peering partners and upstream Tier-1 providers which you pay to managed your international bandwidth.
Peering partners can "BLOCK" you or throttle your surge in access to their capacity if they deem fit but upstream providers who manages your ISP's international connectivity has the responsibility of providing what you paid for and scale accordingly when traffic arises.
Thats why i always not happy with TM,that they not willing to solve the routing problem,as they dont want to invest more on peering,and even their Core Router overload also dont want fix.Is there a route that directly crosses the Pacific from SG without transiting through HK/GUAM/Japan first?
The only cable that can achieve this is through Telin's SEA-US cable which is meant for Indonesia.
AAG is the only major cable which is used by both NTT MSC(Maxis) and TM to transit to HK before crossing the Pacific.
Peering does not help much because when there's a surge of bandwidth requirement, your peering partners will always throttle you to avoid their own networks from being affected by your congestion.
There is 2 different things to differentiate here. Peering partners and upstream Tier-1 providers which you pay to managed your international bandwidth.
Peering partners can "BLOCK" you or throttle your surge in access to their capacity if they deem fit but upstream providers who manages your ISP's international connectivity has the responsibility of providing what you paid for and scale accordingly when traffic arises.
At the end,the best temporary solution is get a VPN to avoid those TM shit routing.
Actually i think there is a business opportunity for somone built a paid VPN network that optimized for Unifi with multiple Server in SG,MY,JP,KH or even CN that originally work well with TM. (Like some latency optimize by Node to Node Tunnel).
Alot of big commercial vpn company actually just built it and never care anymore.
I dont know how many people really need that much of speed,but actually for me,like my last long reply,
I really want a network that minimum network spikes and low latency as it can,rather than hundred mbps of speed but with alot of routing problem.
Beside of Torrenting,Alot of users only use less than 30mbps all of the time,just for browsing or watching 4k video or playing online games.
Quote
0.0193sec
0.51
6 queries
GZIP Disabled