QUOTE(Saladz @ Mar 29 2017, 03:53 PM)
Been reading comments. So many conflicting views on Ryzen and i7.
So am i right to sum up that Ryzen is better than i7 in multitasking but falls short of i7 in gaming?
I am planning to build a PC to be used as my workstation and also for some gaming (CS:GO, Dota 2 and some MMORPGs).
Current PC is laggy (i5 2400) - mostly due to heat i guess, the temperature fluctuation is very high, causing lag spikes which annoy me a lot.
I open like 30 tabs in 2 of my browsers always and tens of Microsoft Excel, Word, Paint & few other programs.
I usually also keep games open without closing them.
Most importantly, i want to keep antivirus open without it slowing down my computer.
I also don't like my PC running hot as i think it causes spikes. So a build with aftermarket coolers is preferred.
In short, for the tasks that i have mentioned: Ryzen or i7?
Budget can be anywhere from 5K to 10K.
This build will be used for dual monitor setup. One for gaming (1080 TN), another for work and other stuffs (4K). Will run them together sometimes if i need to multitask heavily.
Thanks.
Ryzen wins in multithreaded/multicore application, most of the games out there aren't fully utilizing the extra core/thread of PC processor yet, hence the one with higher single core performance will win (just like CS:GO & Dota 2).
If you plan to overclock the CPU, then you'll need to get a decent 3rd party CPU cooler and mobo.
QUOTE(MagnificM @ Mar 29 2017, 04:04 PM)
even the version is the 7200rpm one ?
I'll request for HDD health and bad sector report first, at least I get to know the status of the HDD before I make the purchase right
QUOTE(zorbyss. @ Mar 29 2017, 04:21 PM)
Yeah. Malaysians are really butthurt about AMD. Nvidia kinda has that "prestige" status when comes to GPU. Nvidia titles aside, if ppl study the benchmarks in a while, as in 2016 vs 2017 benchmarks, RX480's performance is increasing gradually overtime when comparing to GTX1060, they're pretty much on par (sponsored titles like Hitman, RotTR aside. DX12/Vulkan is pretty a clear win for AMD
Speaking of Freesync monitors, sometimes non-adaptive sync monitor even more expensive than freesync monitor despite the similar specs. which I can't understand why. Freesync 144hz is kinda pointless as there's still no viable AMD GPU to feed that amount of framerates for newer games.
Hate it when ppl oppose my suggestion for AMD and insisting Nvidia is better without justifying why. The best they do is show me old benchmarks.
GPU technology is evolving rapidly and people tend to change their gaming card in one to two years of time so the performance that they can get
NOW matters the most to them, things might change in the future when Nvidia fails to catch up in the DX12/Vulkan race when they become the primary API.
Avoid fighting with fanboy, pointless to argue with them