Interpac had showed good manager is really important in managing the Fund investment. Just a month time, it return is go faster than KGF.

Interpac fund manager is the same as previous RHB FM. Also leopards don't change their spots. At rhb, he invest in u-li. Now come to interpac, also invest in u-li.

is that "good manager" a new player in this field?
if NO, then before he/she came into Interpac...where was he/she worked in?

Was he/she in the same field of work?
if YES, what happened to those funds he/she managed?


This post has been edited by T231H: May 13 2017, 08:59 AM

Already reply. FM is from Rhb. The onr which cauae u-li fiasco. Now in interpac also invest in u-li again.

Possibility just possibility, another JJPTR in the making?

for some, the definition of good fund manager is when the investors can have continuous good night sleeps.....
for some, the definition of good fund manager is when in just a month time, it return is go faster than other funds ....

who should one choose?



This post has been edited by T231H: May 13 2017, 09:13 AM

not sure about the others but I consider my epf and stocks to be my Malaysian exposure hence why I avoid being too Malaysian centric in my unit trust

will your stocks in Malaysia mkts well diversified as M'sia focused UTs

I considered EPF as my MY FI fund....

This post has been edited by T231H: May 13 2017, 09:19 AM

What exactly is the u-li fiasco ? Did the fund manager created a jjptr fiasco and he can't contain it any further and so he had to leave, or he left then the jjptr fiasco is resulted ?

yep. one for industrial, one for aviation, one for service and utilities.

as I expand my stocks portfolio I slowly cover banking, telco, consumer products, export of raw materials

just like unit trust port you diversify your stock portfolio in various industries

but with so much "work" won't it be easier to just go for UTs

Our new fund manager in the making.

as they say don't put all your eggs in one basket. I do like unit trust but it's kinda boring just investing into it and letting it flourish.

stocks on the other hand offer that adrenaline rush esp when you tap on the buy button and pray to every deity in heaven that you didn't make a mistake esp keying in how many lots you need. a veteran over in stocks exchange keyed in one digit difference and that one digit can mean a 20k myr



also there's the dividends. all fun fun. we'll until you screw up.

This post has been edited by Avangelice: May 13 2017, 09:36 AM

when i always heard master xuzen said the risk reward return is good, i always blur a bit.

how u ppl determined risk reward return in unit trust?

by using 3 year annualized returns divide by 3 yr Annualised Volatility ?...

**** dont know how to tag master xuzen...

This post has been edited by ironman16: May 13 2017, 09:38 AM

good, now I understand already....GOOD Luck to you and have FUN while doing it....

Sharpe & Risk-Return Ratios: What Are Those?

When it comes to selecting a unit trust, its performance should not be the only factor that investors take into account. The fund's risk level is also a crucial consideration. FSM explain how investors can evaluate a fund's risks.
https://secure.fundsupermart.com/main/resea...&articleNo=2387

Two Ratios to Measure a Fund’s Risk Factor
When it comes to selecting a fund, investors should look at both risk and return. Return is easily shown in the fund’s historical performance but risk is harder to ascertain. It is, however, very important as it is possible to lose all your money in a risky fund. Here, we provide two measures to evaluate riskiness of a fund.
https://www.fundsupermart.com.my/main/resea...l?articleNo=110

just to add: Risk rating indicators are measuring indicators NOT a portfolio construction tools

This post has been edited by T231H: May 13 2017, 09:58 AM

your stock return looks to be better then UT

thanks , frien.. ..... later read it

be advised this is way difficult than UT. this is a product of many homework and research and worrying that what if you chose the wrong counter and stand to lose 60% of your capital and it doesn't appreciate. unlike it all you have is measly returns if you made the wrong call

Anybody noticed this section at FSM homepage?

[attachmentid=8812578]

P/S: Sorry if I'm a slowpoke.

all the time but as Xuzen pointed out its best if you avoid new funds until you have enough data from the fund to judge it. it's better allocating your time and money into well tested funds. given a few years who knows those funds will outperform your old ones.