|
yifie:
Lack of follow-through.
There is no point creating a business/industry if the support mechanisms aren't there to ensure long term sustainability. If DOA/MOA/MARDI wants to DEVELOP a business/industry, they have to cover every damn aspect of that business/industry, and not just pockets of it.
Look at Malaysia's palm oil industry. They have responsible entities governing the entire value chain, from seed producers, to grower, to millers and refiners, and even exporters. In amongst this core value-chain, the periphery companies are inserted to support the entire industry, and the industry in turn ensures survival of the periphery entities (eg. agro-chemical industry, fertilizer & compost companies, precision agrinomics businesses etc.).
In the case of vermiculture, what DOA/MOA/MARDI did was create a buzz, tell participants they can do this-this-this with their end products, and then left them hanging to find their own way. I mean, come on, it is a budding business and they expect the pioneers to know what to do? Most of them know next to nuts about managing a business, or how to properly market a product. Fine, maybe 10% of them would find some way to survive, but it means a death rate of 90% of these agro-entrepreneurs.
This is the same thing with goat breeding, cow breeding, and those obscure freshwater fish and marine crab programs. And then there's the massive hydroponics and fertigation fiasco. Not to forget, the mushroom farming projects they initiated at so many places. How many of these programs actually succeeded? And amongst those success cases, how many of them actually received the needed help from DOA/MOA/MARDI?
The likelihood is that those who succeeded had resorted to finding their own way, either by engaging an external consultant, or working with someone having adequate success and experience.
So to put it simply, if it is a DOA/MOA/MARDI initiated project or program, there is a high likelihood of it suffering a similar progression. I'm not saying that every damn project is a total and utter failure, it's just that the odds are not in favor of success.
Added on August 23, 2012, 5:24 pm
It's really scary to read about the looming food crisis... I guess it is understandable why so many people are turning to crime and illegal activities. Obviously, that does not mean it is justified.
But seriously, the percentage of people not being able to afford food in developed countries is on the rise. Just taking the United States of America as example, about 18.2% people there are not able to afford the food they need. I'm not talking about hardcore poor here, although they certainly make up a significant portion of that figure; the figure includes families from middle-class, fixed-income groups.
To put this into perspective, 1 in 4 people in the US cannot afford the food they need. The food they need to survive does not include bread, cheeses, fresh fruits etc., but staples like grains/cereals, milk, vegetables, etc. And the No. 1 thing most from this group can't afford is: Meat.
Yes, meats like beef, mutton, fish, chicken, etc. They cannot afford it anymore.
Is this a good or bad thing? Bear in mind, this is only the US we're talking about here; we haven't even begun looking at the EU, or Latin America, or even Asia.
And the news just gets worse. 2 in every 100 Chinese citizen cannot find a job. This may not look bad, after all it's like only 2%. But bear in mind, China has a working-age population of nearly 660,000,000; so that works up to 26,000,000 people. That means 26 million people who are competiting with the rest of the world for jobs.
We all know that without a stable income source, it is quite difficult to gain ends meet. Which makes the food crisis problem all the more dangerous. Less food available equals to higher food costs, which could lead to many other undesirable effects within society.
Let us open up this thread for discussion. Does anyone have any genuine idea of how to mitigate this problem? No need to find a solution which works on a global/national scale; even a solution that would result in a reduced household food bill would have a tremendous impact on society.
My first suggestion(s):
i. Home growing - To educate people to grow their own food in their homes. And not just simple container growing for novelty sake. I do mean growing sufficient veg and animal proteins to offset about 10%-15% of the monthly family food bill at least.
ii. Community farm plots - Where a group of people pool their resources and time to tend a shared plot of land used to grow vegetables/fruits/animal protein for the group. All members will have to contribute their inputs, and not just monetary, but most crucially the time and labor needed. Community farm plots should ideally off-set about 20%-25% of the family food bill each month.
iii.
This post has been edited by Michael J.: Aug 23 2012, 05:29 PM
|