Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

76 Pages « < 27 28 29 30 31 > » Bottom

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 Thaurissan- [LoTH] Guild-Horde. www.lothguild.org, Casual, Progressive, Friendly Community

views
     
chaichai
post Feb 9 2007, 12:58 AM

Getting Started
**
Validating
66 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Azeroth
QUOTE(stefanong @ Feb 8 2007, 04:00 PM)
I thought the essence of a casual guild is that people level in their own pace which was stressed in the beginning. Some will be slower than others...looks like the guild's definition of casual is changing to hardcore....i haven't signed up yet because the line in my area is basically SH(*& and besides I wanted to see whether the guild was casual friendly as promoted.

Is there a maximum limit to how many players can be in a guild? e.g. maximum 200 or 300? If there isnt, then a simple comparison of level distribution between lets say 2-3 months will tell you approximately how many truly casual/slow levelers there are and the proportion of more serious/hard core players. Then to supplement lagging classes start opening memberships in tranches while still allowing the slowpokes to level at their own pace (albeit slowly) Review the class mix each 3 months and Voila! There is no need to kick anybody out..is there?

This is of course dependant on whether there is a limit on members joining the guild and whether the overall "spirit" of LoTH has not changed from a "welcome all" to just another "serious players only" guild.
*
Good Point, Bro... thumbup.gif
Tabit... notworthy.gif

This post has been edited by chaichai: Feb 9 2007, 01:00 AM
TSnitrofang
post Feb 9 2007, 01:59 AM

New Member
*
Junior Member
32 posts

Joined: Dec 2006
point noted.

lets go on

please vote your favorite tabard now! biggrin.gif get in loth.clans.net, go to the world of warcraft general discussion thread, and vote! thank you.

ps: pleaseeee dont vote the pink colour!
myremi
post Feb 9 2007, 07:04 AM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,846 posts

Joined: Feb 2006
From: Kuching, Sarawak


QUOTE(nitrofang @ Feb 9 2007, 01:59 AM)

ps: pleaseeee dont vote the pink colour!
*
takes a strong man to wear pink. cool2.gif

btw mainframe, excellent post.
seen
post Feb 9 2007, 08:39 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
87 posts

Joined: Aug 2006
QUOTE(nitrofang @ Feb 9 2007, 01:59 AM)
point noted.


ps: pleaseeee dont vote the pink colour!
*
WHY oh WHYYYYYYY in god's did you even put a pink choice in there? SHAME!!!!


Added on February 9, 2007, 8:55 amJust voted....PINK BUNNEEEEEEE?
But phew, at least it only goes to Tabard 7 :b

This post has been edited by seen: Feb 9 2007, 08:55 AM
Delirium
post Feb 9 2007, 10:15 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
273 posts

Joined: Oct 2004
Damn, option for Tabard 8 is not available.
stefanong
post Feb 9 2007, 10:31 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
322 posts

Joined: Jul 2006


QUOTE(nitrofang @ Feb 8 2007, 11:27 PM)

.....

when we said casual AND progressive, we meant that this guild is taking time to level at their own pace while progressing toward the objective (i.e end game instances and PVP). NOT casuals as in hi my name is casuals and i parked my nick here while i go play my main and thats the last time we see him/her. we are casuals in terms of the number of hours we commit in the game, which in this case, much lesser hours and liberal as compared to hardcore. let me just break this up into groups so u guys can properly understand. 

1) casuals who dont give a damn ---> 2) casual raiders (this is LoTH) ----> 3) hardcore (must attend every raid on weekend and weekdays) ----> 4) ultra elite. (omfg u dont log in 4 hours u are gkick!)

later as the guild progress we find that hey there are actually a lot of casual raiders (woking ppl, students, nubies, rerolls etc) which really suit the guild characteristics and we need to put some form of the rules, strategy, plan, idea, guide, in place to maintain the guild development. so dont confuse the word casuals as in casual guild that dont give a damn of the guild development. guild harmony and development is actually our major focus.

bottomline is, we are a casual guild, but we still have proper plan, rules and strategy in place so that every casuals out there who are unable to commit the requirement of a hardcore guild can still enjoy the game. thats why u join LoTH... without going mental.

....

*
Firstly, so very sorry for being a pain. I kinda understand where you are heading but there is one concern that isn't being addressed... what is your definition of casual?

Casual gamer who levels in his/her own time could mean a gamer who levels at a pace of how much time he/she has. E.g. If a "casual gamer" only plays 2 hours on Saturday when he is back from outstation before leaving for his job on Sunday and basically is non existent working till the next sunday...can this be considered casual? He is progressing mind you...each time you log in and play you earn exp so technically as long as that blue bubble moves..he is progressing. My question to you is this..Is he progressing at the pace which is counted as acceptable by the honorable LoTH officers?

I completely understand that casual and yes even regular/hard core players should not be spared from being kicked if they don't give a damn about the guild, cause disharmony, grief others and misbehaving to a point he/she becomes a liability. But kicking someone because he/she is slow is another thing. Let it be stated from the start what and how many hours is deemed acceptable to you which fits the expected "casual gamer

No one wants to invest precious little time (yes some ppl actually are posted offshore or outstation for weeks or even months) to level their toons (albeit ssllllloooooowwwwlly) to find that they are kicked out because their "casualness" is too casual for LoTH.

so yes, this still remains a concern.

Again my apologies for inconvenience caused.
seen
post Feb 9 2007, 10:59 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
87 posts

Joined: Aug 2006
I think that if a person has to stop for a significant amount of time, it's just common courtesy to inform the guild. IMO, if a person just disappears and did not login to his/her character in 2 months+ with nobody knowing anything, removing him/her from the guild is justifiable. But if someone is going overseas/work/unable to login for a reason for 3 months but did inform the guild that he/she will be back then I don't think removing this person is justifiable.

Casual & progressive does not mean "park your alt here"
Tentris
post Feb 9 2007, 11:22 AM

New Member
*
Junior Member
8 posts

Joined: Jun 2006


Apologies if my post earlier caused a misunderstanding. Please allow me to clarify, by sharing what i posted on the guild forums earlier:

QUOTE
I've explained my POV on the matter extensively in the officer forums, and suggested ideas there.

Its good that this topic has arrived now, its timely as we, as a guild, need to start talking about it openly -- a large chunk of the guild is approaching the level 30 zone, it wont be much longer before we have this group going into the 60s.

The OP is a "casual lah" player. There are many "casual lah"s in WoW, and i believe even in our guild presently. This is absolutely no problem whatsoever imo. We can have as many "casual lah" players, but when they join the guild, they must understand that's all there are entitled to as far as end-game raid privileges go.

Raiding is a completely different ball game. "Casual lah" players will find it hard to keep up with raid schedules, raid demands (3-4 hours per raid + 2-3 hours per day farming for money to pay for raid repairs & consumables). And to be fair to the other 25-40 people in the raid (i believe Blizz will bring back 40-man raiding in the near future for lvl 70s), those who join a raid should be what i call "raid committed" -- able to perform, willing to learn, ready to go the distance.

Otherwise, you'll just get raid after raid of wipes, frustrations and disappointment. Blizzard has designed many high-end encounters to require the best from all members of the raid -- so even if a few people stuff up, everyone will die = wasted time = wasted gold.

That's why i've been advocating a guild hierarchy based on what YOU (the player) wants to achieve from the guild.

If you declare yourself to be "casual lah" -- play when you want, level as you want, no one will ever remove or criticise you. There will be no expectations put upon you by the guild, and you know that whenever you play in Thaurissian, you will have a home with LoTH. The downside is that you cannot expect automatic invites to guild raids.

If you declare yourself as a "casual but wanna raid" -- then there will be certain expectations, things like raid schedule, things like willingness to farm for raid mats, etc. You won't be expected to attend all raids, but it would be nice if you could tell your class leaders when you'll be coming and when you can't come.

If you declare yourself as "hardcore raider" (and even LoTH will have a few of those), then you're an idea candicate to be a class leader, and you really, really enjoy raiding. Without having to be asked, you will attend all raids, only miss the odd raids here and there if you really cant make it, and will always want to have the best raid consumables ready = lots of non-raid farming time. The upside of this is that you will ALWAYS be picked first when raid invites go out.

Just like any pyramid, the guild can only accomodate a certain number of each type of player.

"Casual" players = unlimited number, no class restrictions, will only be invited to raid when there are spare spots and no one left online to fill them.
"Casual raider" = some restrictions in number, some class restrictions (about 25-30 ppl in this category, 3-4 per class), will be invited to raid based on class make-up.
"Core Raider" = definite restrictions in number and class (10-15 ppl, 1-3 per class), #1 priority for raid invites.

That's the problem the officers are currently facing now, and thats why we've had to freeze applications for the time being. We don't know who is really casual, and who has some commitment to raid. If all 100 members, when everyone is 70, want to raid, then we will have big problems, because we obviously cannot accomodate everyone. From experience, running multiple guild raids concurrently causes MASSIVE guild drama, and ultimately leads to guild splits.

At some point in the future, we'll probably need to ask people to declare their intentions in this guild. Our guild charter states that we want to be a guild for all Malaysians, but we also want to be able to make progress in the game (and in WoW progress = raids). By telling the officers what you want to do in WoW, it'll help us tailor the guild to suit as wide a base of playstyles as possible.

For future /ginvites, we should probably start asking new recruits what role they want to play in the guild. If they say they just wanna be casual, then that's an automatic invite. If they want to raid, then the officers must first analyze our raiding roster to see whether we have opening for another of that class. If there is an opening, then an invite is likely (pending a short trial period perhaps to see whether the player suits the raid), if there isn't an opening, then the application may be declined unless the player accepts a "casual" role (most raiders won't accept a casual role -- since they want to raid, they want to join a guild which can give them a raid spot).


And also here:

QUOTE
Apologize, perhaps my wording was not accurate. I was appointed the guild raid leader, and my responsibilities include forming a successful raiding team. My comments were directed to those who intend to raid, but cannot commit themselves to the raid in a sufficiently appropriate manner. I know it sounds harsh, but i've got to think about the other 25-50 ppl who want to raid, and who make the effort to turn up to the raid well prepared.


This post has been edited by Tentris: Feb 9 2007, 12:16 PM
xavier99
post Feb 9 2007, 11:52 AM

New Member
*
Junior Member
15 posts

Joined: Dec 2004



QUOTE(Tentris @ Feb 9 2007, 11:22 AM)
For future /ginvites, we should probably start asking new recruits what role they want to play in the guild. If they say they just wanna be casual, then that's an automatic invite. If they want to raid, then the officers must first analyze our raiding roster to see whether we have opening for another of that class. If there is an opening, then an invite is likely (pending a short trial period perhaps to see whether the player suits the raid), if there isn't an opening, then the application may be declined unless the player accepts a "casual" role (most raiders won't accept a casual role -- since they want to raid, they want to join a guild which can give them a raid spot).
*
ok start from me?
i want to be raiders as well
race: tauren (hope so)
warrior: warrior (hope so)
time : 8pm to 12pm
monday to friday...(except thursday)
saturday and sunday ... whole day ? if neccessary.
will get my stater kit on saturday.


Tentris
post Feb 9 2007, 12:12 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
8 posts

Joined: Jun 2006


We need warriors. Put an app on the forums. smile.gif
saingau
post Feb 9 2007, 12:21 PM

New Member
*
Newbie
1 posts

Joined: Jan 2007


I understand this is an in-guild issue, but since its shared with the community in LYN, I would like to share some advice with you guys.

CASUAL V RAIDER
Litany of Fury used to have similar problems to what you guys had when we started. What we did to solve this issue was to split the guild ranks into the following: -

1. GM & co-GM
2. Officers / Class Leaders
3. Raiders
4. Casual Members
5. Alts
6. Trial Members

Perhaps this might be of use to you guys. Also, we implemented certain rules in place to ensure the raiders are the ones going for raids. Amongst them are: -

1. Raiders get priority in terms of raid invites - if both a raider and a casual signed up, raider gets the invite.

2. Looting - Raiders get first option on loot.

There were a few other rules in place as well...

While this seem to benefit the raiders and sideline the casuals, this is for the benefit of the guild's progression. Who are the players who are pushing the guild forward? Who are the players who are tackling the current encounters (not farmed instances)? They must be rewarded accordingly.

ENFORCEMENT
All the above looks good on paper, but one thing you guys need to be in control of is ENFORCEMENT. With a guild of that size, the class officers will need to be really committed and manage the raider/casual ratio. Raiders who slack off and do not meet the raider requirements (e.g. 80% attendance or watever your % is) needs to be demoted to casual so they dont get priviledges they should not be getting (anymore). Also, casuals can be raiders one day (e.g. their work is not that busy anymore), so class leaders must be aware not to sideline them.


Added on February 9, 2007, 12:24 pmLitany of Fury has since moved on from a guild size of that porpotion, we've refocused and reinvented ourselves to be a SWAT team - small (approx 30 - 40 ACTIVE players) and skilled - to cater for 25mans. Also, we didnt give up our 'casual / mature' spirit.

Lastly, I cant reinforce this enough. ENFORCEMENT... this is very important. From the Guild Leader down to the Raid Leader, each of the mgmt team needs to be in sync with the policies and enforce them, else it will break the guild.

Good luck guys!


This post has been edited by saingau: Feb 9 2007, 12:24 PM
myremi
post Feb 9 2007, 01:39 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,846 posts

Joined: Feb 2006
From: Kuching, Sarawak


I'm not LoTH member and just reading what is being typed here.

Casual Gamer vs. Hardcore Gamer discussion looks to be moving on from guild charter definitions to "trying-to-catch-LoTH-leaders-say-something-wrong-in-LYN". From what I see anyways. And if it's protecting the "little people" in in the guild, if you're not a member, I'm assuming that your views may not carry much weight or you have other reasons for pestering LoTH leaders here. Harsh reality but would be true, I would think.

At the end of the day, guild progression is about member's cooperation. The more they give to the guild community, the more they benefit from loot (ultimate aim anyways).

I also think for those of us who aren't in the guild to give Nitrofang and Tentris time to sort themselves out. We're human and will make mistakes. tongue.gif

This post has been edited by myremi: Feb 9 2007, 03:35 PM
seen
post Feb 9 2007, 02:28 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
87 posts

Joined: Aug 2006
As far as I'm concerned, I think nitrofang's and tentris's (latter post) explained it already. Just some misunderstandings and wrong choices of words, which is unavoidable since we are using the forum to communicate.

For me, this case is closed. For me lah, dunno about others.

So yeah, please move on. Guild tabard, please choose tabard 4. whistling.gif

This post has been edited by seen: Feb 9 2007, 02:29 PM
TSnitrofang
post Feb 11 2007, 12:40 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
32 posts

Joined: Dec 2006
QUOTE(saingau @ Feb 9 2007, 12:21 PM)
I understand this is an in-guild issue, but since its shared with the community in LYN, I would like to share some advice with you guys.

CASUAL V RAIDER
Litany of Fury used to have similar problems to what you guys had when we started. What we did to solve this issue was to split the guild ranks into the following...
thank you saingau for the very useful and comprehensive suggestions. thank you too for those who give the useful input to us. on behalf of loth, we apologize for the misunderstanding created earlier.

based on the numerous suggestions and opinions, we are now sorting out the guild in terms of

1) recruitment policy
2) identifying raiders and casuals.

we almost reach the final decision and we will announce it soon.


Added on February 11, 2007, 7:44 pmAs promised, we have sort out our rank and chain of command hierarchy.

1) Commander (nitrofang)
2) 2nd in Command (valkyrie) (take over commander work if commander not around)
3) Vice Commander-1 ( shaderx, rantic, raichu) (promote, demote, ginvite, gkick, discipline officer)
4) Vice Commander-2 (create for backup plan)
5) Officers (sophiera, babynut) (forum, board mod, scout, class leader, raid leader)
6) Elite Raiders - >85% raid attendance
7) Casual Raiders - >65% raid attendance
8) Casual Peon - <65% raid attendance, including Alts.
9) Overthrown-Peon. (bad discipline).

We hope that with this implementation, we can identify members guild commitment effectively.

in a related development, we are happy to announce that we are opening back our recruitment for new members who wish to join in our family. We are currently accepting all class EXCEPT hunters and rogue. Please visit our forum at loth.clans.net or the first post of this thread to get information regarding this guild. biggrin.gif

This post has been edited by nitrofang: Feb 11 2007, 07:44 PM
Delirium
post Feb 12 2007, 11:10 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
273 posts

Joined: Oct 2004
No pink tabard?
saingau
post Feb 12 2007, 01:58 PM

New Member
*
Newbie
1 posts

Joined: Jan 2007


QUOTE(Delirium @ Feb 12 2007, 11:10 AM)
No pink tabard?
*
Although I'm not in the guild, can I vote for Pink? I know someone said it earlier, but really, it takes a REAL MAN to wear pink!!! Haha biggrin.gif


TO NITRO
No worries man, just trying to help out the community. Its good to see Malaysians taking up a leadership role (in any capacity), since we're sorely lacking leadership in Malaysia! LOL

QUOTE
8) Casual Peon - <65% raid attendance, including Alts.


Best rank in the guild IMO!!!

This post has been edited by saingau: Feb 12 2007, 01:58 PM
seen
post Feb 12 2007, 02:52 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
87 posts

Joined: Aug 2006
QUOTE(saingau @ Feb 12 2007, 01:58 PM)
, it takes a REAL MAN to wear pink!!! Haha biggrin.gif
*
No, more like sissy boys need to find an excuse to make them feel like a man, so they came up with all these crap about being a real man to wear pink when in truth they're just sissies who WANTS to wear pink because they are sissies and love sickly sweet ugly stuff with no aesthetic taste whatsoever....

:b
stefanong
post Feb 12 2007, 03:40 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
322 posts

Joined: Jul 2006


Thanks nitrofang for your excellent reply. Esp with the ranks based on raid attendance it clearly spells out what is to be expected from members.
Hornsen
post Feb 12 2007, 04:28 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
131 posts

Joined: Jan 2007
From: Somewhere I Belong


QUOTE
1) Commander (nitrofang)
2) 2nd in Command (valkyrie) (take over commander work if commander not around)
3) Vice Commander-1 ( shaderx, rantic, raichu) (promote, demote, ginvite, gkick, discipline officer)
4) Vice Commander-2 (create for backup plan)
5) Officers (sophiera, babynut) (forum, board mod, scout, class leader, raid leader)
6) Elite Raiders - >85% raid attendance
7) Casual Raiders - >65% raid attendance
8) Casual Peon - <65% raid attendance, including Alts.
9) Overthrown-Peon. (bad discipline).
Sud add one more,
Lazy Peon = <10% raid attendance...

biggrin.gif
seen
post Feb 12 2007, 04:51 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
87 posts

Joined: Aug 2006
Hmm...many raids does the guild plan to have per week? 65% = x no. of raids. Please define x.

76 Pages « < 27 28 29 30 31 > » Top
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0258sec    0.34    6 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 21st December 2025 - 05:32 AM