Ahhh yes, that is y the koreans also dislike the japanese apart from what the japanese did to them during the world war 2 if not mistaken.

And the koreans may seem to have regarded the chinese as their big brother.

Yea, I use to be at RWI until I fell in love with the /k language here and trollings. Just too addictive. 

LEL, Chinese and Japanese animosity only started in ww2 after the rape of Nanking, before that quite close actually

fuuuhh 15 pages.

got any mention where in melaka the holy grail is buried?

Well the invasion of Korea/China was the final events that started with the invasion of Korea by Toyotomi Hideyoshi

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Japanese_inva...592%E2%80%9398)
The invasions were launched by Toyotomi Hideyoshi with the intent of conquering Korea and China, which were ruled by the Joseon and Ming dynasties, respectively. Japan quickly succeeded in occupying large portions of the Korean Peninsula, but the contribution of reinforcements by the Ming Dynasty,[21] as well as the disruption of Japanese supply fleets along the western and southern coasts by the Joseon Navyforced a withdrawal of Japanese forces from Pyongyang and the northern provinces to the south, where the Japanese continued to occupy Hanseong (present-day Seoul) and the southern regions except the southwestern Jeolla province.

Turnbull, Stephen (Nov 20, 2012). The Samurai Invasion of Korea 1592-98
Perez, Louis (2013). Japan At War: An Encyclopedia. Santa Barbara, California: ABC-CLIO.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aragonese_Crusade
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Albigensian_Crusade
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fourth_Crusade (yeah, technically it was planned to invade Egypt though)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Northern_Crusades
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Livonian_Crusade
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prussian_Crusade
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wendish_Crusade

Okay. I know I gave you wiki links but you can double check with the original resources from the link given.

In any case, as the topic the reconquista was a cruda too.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reconquista

So, there's nothing wrong to consider post reconquista by the Spanish and the Portugese as the crusades too.

Back then Catholics are the one that matched muslims in term of fanaticism and zealotry.
Catholic Church was hostile not only to Muslims, but also to other Christians, such as Protestants and Orthodox
But the Catholic Church had been largely "tamed" in the 1960s through the Second Vatican Council.
If you read the Vatican documents about non-Catholic religions before Second Vatican Council, it's all about vulgar condemnation to other religions and ideologies such as secularism and liberalism.
After 1960s they changed the language to be more diplomatic, etc.

Y'all should cukur that the Catholics is now "tame". If not, the one fighting the wars in the middle east is not secular governments, but theocratic catholic monarchs instead....

fellow historians,

Since now we are touching japanese adi.

1) Why is there animosity between china and japan until to-date?

2) Who cause more trouble to each other?

Seem like these has been on-going for centuries!

This is helpful just for general information.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Japanese_inva...592%E2%80%9398)

I think they've already tamed by the time the church was banned in France during the French revolution. Even when Napoleon invited back the church, they don't have the same status they were once during the French Monarchy. Once Enlightenment is in full force then the church practically lost whatever temporal power they have earlier.

First crusade yr 1096–1099
Aragonese yr 1284 and 1285
Albigensian yr 1209–1229
Fourth_Crusade yr 1202–1204
Northern yr 1193
Livonian yr 1207
Prussian yr 1230
Wendish yr 1147
Reconquista period of approximately 781 years in the history of the Iberian Peninsula, after the Islamic conquest in 711 to the fall of Granada

Traditionally, historians mark the beginning of the Reconquista with the Battle of Covadonga (718 or 722), in which a small army, led by the nobleman Pelagius, defeated an Umayyad army in the mountains of northern Iberia  now who started the fight first?

The grail will only appear to the worthy.

Started what ? 

Anyway who started what is up to historians to debate.

However if the crusade can be seen literally as 'taken up the cross' then maybe we can say the battle of the milvian bridge as the first crusade (even though it was chi ro rather than a cross as we know).

Can 

p/s: you probably already know but I just post the link for the sake of those who never heard of ti and are interested to know.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_the_Milvian_Bridge

no CRUSADE word sighted at milvian 

If you read the book, the who pages of the book and not just the front cover you'll find the holy grail.

If not, then no.

The grail will only appear to the worthy.

itu bukan budaya kita