Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Bump Topic Topic Closed RSS Feed
123 Pages « < 39 40 41 42 43 > » Bottom

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

> Military Thread V17

views
     
waja2000
post Jun 24 2015, 11:39 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
137 posts

Joined: Oct 2006
QUOTE(thpace @ Jun 24 2015, 11:35 PM)
Egypt to receive FREMM frigate on 23 June

user posted image
i didnt know it a hand me down ship  laugh.gif
*
that why price need 1 billion euro. laugh.gif
also next 2 month will pass 3-4 unit Rafale make for France AF to Egypt AF,
basically Egypt bought over ready make new Fremm and Rafale for France Navy/Airforce via France Gov.

This post has been edited by waja2000: Jun 24 2015, 11:42 PM
thpace
post Jun 24 2015, 11:50 PM

Rising Star
******
Senior Member
1,210 posts

Joined: Aug 2011
QUOTE(AllahKhabar @ Jun 24 2015, 11:38 PM)
user posted image
Anybody can confirm whether this true?
*
u register just for this?

There no even link to the said chinese forum
https://www.facebook.com/philippinesdefense

there two thing, one they would want to avoid direct confrontation.

LTZ sure can confirm that they are under strict order not to engage tongue.gif

or second, it pinoy. Their make up story is godlike


kerolzarmyfanboy
post Jun 24 2015, 11:50 PM

On my way
****
Junior Member
575 posts

Joined: Feb 2013
QUOTE(AllahKhabar @ Jun 24 2015, 11:38 PM)
user posted image
Anybody can confirm whether this true?
*
dat LYN name..
dat joined date..

i can smell trollbait.....

anyway need to wait LTZ, our unofficial TLDM's representative

This post has been edited by kerolzarmyfanboy: Jun 24 2015, 11:51 PM
waja2000
post Jun 25 2015, 12:00 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
137 posts

Joined: Oct 2006
QUOTE(AllahKhabar @ Jun 24 2015, 11:38 PM)
user posted image
Anybody can confirm whether this true?
*
Just Pinoy forum, off course there writing want to increase incite angry to china.
if really turn on fire control radar, is normal to leave to avoided case become serious, just like japan case.
anyway pass 1-3 day don't see china major military forum got this kindly of report.
i every day visit china military forum few time a day.

This post has been edited by waja2000: Jun 25 2015, 12:03 AM
thpace
post Jun 25 2015, 12:02 AM

Rising Star
******
Senior Member
1,210 posts

Joined: Aug 2011
QUOTE(AllahKhabar @ Jun 24 2015, 11:54 PM)
I usually just read thru but i saw that post then feeling abit uncomfy must confirm with ltz
*
I rather read the nonsense watchchinatimes articles that reading those pinoy defence blog tongue.gif

Claim so great but they actually lost an island to china while we still maintaining ours. Just that, we are under strict order not to engage or show aggression


thpace
post Jun 25 2015, 12:03 AM

Rising Star
******
Senior Member
1,210 posts

Joined: Aug 2011
QUOTE(waja2000 @ Jun 25 2015, 12:00 AM)
Just Pinoy forum, off course there writing want to increase incite angry to china.
if really turn on fire control radar, is normal to leave to avoided case become serious, just like japan case.
anyway pass 2-3 day don't see china major military forum got this kindly of report.
i very day visit china military forum few time a day.
*
the comment there are even greater

call us traitors.. some evn say they are better warrior.. PFTff even their best ship is a former cutter.. a cutter not even a military hand me down ship laugh.gif
waja2000
post Jun 25 2015, 12:05 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
137 posts

Joined: Oct 2006
QUOTE(thpace @ Jun 25 2015, 12:03 AM)
the comment there are even greater

call us traitors.. some evn say they are better warrior.. PFTff even their best ship is a former cutter.. a cutter not even a military hand me down ship laugh.gif
*
they will more show off went they receive new ship purchase last 1-2 year ago. biggrin.gif nod.gif

This post has been edited by waja2000: Jun 25 2015, 12:06 AM
hafizushi
post Jun 25 2015, 12:17 AM

New Member
*
Junior Member
28 posts

Joined: Aug 2010


QUOTE(thpace @ Jun 24 2015, 11:50 PM)
u register just for this?

There no even link to the said chinese forum
https://www.facebook.com/philippinesdefense

there two thing, one they would want to avoid direct confrontation.

LTZ sure can confirm that they are under strict order not to engage tongue.gif

or second, it pinoy. Their make up story is godlike
*
haha so true i cant forget the make up story in regards to kiram gang last time, that probably the best make up story i've ever read
SUSalaskanbunny
post Jun 25 2015, 12:21 AM

Foodie
*******
Senior Member
4,283 posts

Joined: Nov 2009
From: Vietnam

QUOTE(thpace @ Jun 24 2015, 11:30 PM)
that still ok, the new isis execution video is more sickening

dead by rpg, dead by drowing and now even dead by det cord..  doh.gif
*
det cord one was the most realistic

QUOTE(AllahKhabar @ Jun 24 2015, 11:38 PM)
user posted image
Anybody can confirm whether this true?
*
peenoise.. scums of the earth

QUOTE(thpace @ Jun 24 2015, 11:50 PM)
u register just for this?

There no even link to the said chinese forum
https://www.facebook.com/philippinesdefense

there two thing, one they would want to avoid direct confrontation.

LTZ sure can confirm that they are under strict order not to engage tongue.gif

or second, it pinoy. Their make up story is godlike
*
QUOTE(thpace @ Jun 25 2015, 12:03 AM)
the comment there are even greater

call us traitors.. some evn say they are better warrior.. PFTff even their best ship is a former cutter.. a cutter not even a military hand me down ship laugh.gif
*
peenoise wanna eat giant's fist we better dont get in the way... peenoise are good for ntg than being maids n whores for americunts.. n maybe plant banana...
BorneoAlliance
post Jun 25 2015, 12:43 AM

New Member
*
Newbie
0 posts

Joined: Dec 2014

Why Russian submarines are making waves in Asia

user posted image

QUOTE
As China prepares for a high stakes naval duel, its neighbours are getting the jitters. In the South China Sea, a clutch of nations such as Vietnam, the Philippines, Brunei, Taiwan and Malaysia are seeing aggressive Chinese naval patrols. In the East China Sea, Japan and Taiwan are contesting Beijing’s claim to the uninhabited Senkaku Islands.

Vietnam has quietly got itself an insurance policy. In 2009, Hanoi signed a $3.2 billion deal that includes six Kilo class submarines and construction of a submarine facility at Cam Ranh Bay. The last of the boats is scheduled for delivery by 2016. “Up to 50 mines may be carried as an alternative to torpedoes and missiles, an important area-denial capability,” says a report by the US Navy Institute.

Indonesia’s Defence Strategic Plan 2024 calls for a fivefold increase in the number of submarines over the coming decade. The country has a long history of operating Russian submarines. In 1967 it acquired 12 Whiskey class submarines from Moscow.

Lately, Russian efforts to sell subs have foundered. In 2013, Indonesia held talks with Russia to procure a number of Kilo-class submarines but no deal was struck. But Moscow isn’t giving up. This year the Russian government has again approached Jakarta to offer brand new Kilos to bolster the country’s maritime defence.

Thailand, Malaysia and Taiwan are other nations set to expand their undersea fleets. Pro-western Thailand may be a hard market to crack but Malaysia – which operates Russian Sukhoi-30MKM aircraft – could be persuaded to look at the cost-benefit aspects and strike capabilities of the Kilos and Ladas.

Taiwan has four rust buckets and is desperate for replacements, but is finding major suppliers shying away from it because of Chinese pressure. If Russia can get around that, then it can get into the good books of one of the richest armaments buyers in the region.

Another nation in the periphery that may end up buying Russian diesel-electric submarines is Bangladesh. It had initially wanted to buy Chinese subs but India – which operates ten Kilos – convinced Dhaka to buy Russian submarines instead. Defense Radar reports that Bangladesh proposes to purchase two submarines from Russia.


http://rbth.com/blogs/2015/06/24/why_russi...asia_47179.html
BorneoAlliance
post Jun 25 2015, 12:54 AM

New Member
*
Newbie
0 posts

Joined: Dec 2014

Mitsubishi eyes technological leap, and exports, with armored vehicle

user posted image

QUOTE
TOKYO (Reuters) - In January, a top U.S. Marine general visited Mitsubishi Heavy Industries in Japan to look at a prototype of an amphibious assault vehicle that could one day be a key pillar in Prime Minister Shinzo Abe's push to sell weapons abroad.

Using engines adapted from the main battle tank the company makes for Japan's military and new water jet propulsion technology, the full-size prototype is undergoing pool tests, although it is in the early stages of development and production could be years off.

Nevertheless, the maker of the wartime Zero fighter plane is eyeing overseas sales after Abe lifted a decades-old ban on arms exports in April last year as part of his more muscular security agenda, two Japanese defense industry sources said.

Mitsubishi designers believe the prototype shown to U.S. Marine Corps Pacific commander Lieutenant General John Toolan will be more maneuverable and faster across the water than the 40-year-old AAV7 amphibious assault vehicle used to carry U.S. marines onto beaches from naval ships anchored offshore, the sources said.

The AAV7 is built by the U.S. unit of Britain's BAE Systems.

The prototype's engines in particular could be fitted onto other armored vehicles, the sources added.

"It's an opportunity for Mitsubishi Heavy to tap overseas markets for its engine technology," said one of the sources, who declined to be identified because he was not authorized to speak to the media.

Mitsubishi Heavy wants to build an amphibious armored vehicle that can move through water at 20 to 25 knots (37 to 46 km per hour) compared to the more than 7 knots (13 km per hour) reached by the AAV7, said the sources.

"If the Japanese can get 20 knots in the water without compromising maneuverability on land, we will be very interested," said one Marine Corps official who saw the prototype in January but declined to be identified.

"Whether that's possible remains to be seen."


https://uk.finance.yahoo.com/news/mitsubish...-211002018.html
KYPMbangi
post Jun 25 2015, 01:02 AM

New Member
*
Junior Member
39 posts

Joined: Jun 2008


Royal Thai Air Force F-16 accident

user posted image

A Thai Air Force F-16 from 102 Squadron skidded off a taxiway and crashed into a drainage ditch at Korat Air Base at 13:00hrs today. The pilot ejected and was slightly hurt.
The F-16A ADF suddenly lurched forward almost 100 metres when the engine was started and was idling. The plane slid into the ditch and the pilot successfully ejected from the aircraft.

http://www.f-16.net/f-16-news-article4958.html

This post has been edited by KYPMbangi: Jun 25 2015, 02:14 AM
thpace
post Jun 25 2015, 01:22 AM

Rising Star
******
Senior Member
1,210 posts

Joined: Aug 2011
QUOTE(BorneoAlliance @ Jun 25 2015, 12:54 AM)
Mitsubishi eyes technological leap, and exports, with armored vehicle

user posted image
https://uk.finance.yahoo.com/news/mitsubish...-211002018.html
*
They would have secured a large sales of their engine tech when korea requested them

Now with turkey atlay using the same hull.. what a wasted opportunity
thpace
post Jun 25 2015, 01:23 AM

Rising Star
******
Senior Member
1,210 posts

Joined: Aug 2011
QUOTE(KYPMbangi @ Jun 25 2015, 01:02 AM)
Royal Thai Air Force F-16 accident

user posted image

A Thai Air Force F-16 from 102 Squadron skidded off a taxiway and crashed into a drainage ditch at Korat Air Base at 13:00hrs today. The pilot ejected and was slightly hurt.
The F-16A ADF suddenly lurched forward almost 100 metres when the engine was started and was idling. The plane slid into the ditch and the pilot successfully ejected from the aircraft.
*
Is that a sidewinder ?
KYPMbangi
post Jun 25 2015, 01:40 AM

New Member
*
Junior Member
39 posts

Joined: Jun 2008


QUOTE(thpace @ Jun 25 2015, 01:23 AM)
Is that a sidewinder ?
*
Most probably
LTZ
post Jun 25 2015, 04:13 AM

New Member
*
Newbie
36 posts

Joined: Sep 2013
QUOTE(kerolzarmyfanboy @ Jun 24 2015, 11:50 PM)
dat LYN name..
dat joined date..

i can smell trollbait.....

anyway need to wait LTZ, our unofficial TLDM's representative
*
Dont know about this..... maybe true or maybe not. U know la when we are facing that mighty destroyer or big frigate...... it is a provocation already.

But run like dogs is like what?? how does it looks like??

This post has been edited by LTZ: Jun 25 2015, 04:18 AM
LTZ
post Jun 25 2015, 04:15 AM

New Member
*
Newbie
36 posts

Joined: Sep 2013
QUOTE(AllahKhabar @ Jun 24 2015, 11:54 PM)
I usually just read thru but i saw that post then feeling abit uncomfy must confirm with ltz
*
Btw.... ur name is not that nice to read & hear for some of us.... please change.....
SUSLaVilla
post Jun 25 2015, 04:28 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
70 posts

Joined: Nov 2012
QUOTE(waja2000 @ Jun 25 2015, 12:00 AM)
Just Pinoy forum, off course there writing want to increase incite angry to china.
if really turn on fire control radar, is normal to leave to avoided case become serious, just like japan case.
anyway pass 1-3 day don't see china major military forum got this kindly of report.
i every day visit china military forum few time a day.
*
Got link for the china military forum?
BorneoAlliance
post Jun 25 2015, 05:02 AM

New Member
*
Newbie
0 posts

Joined: Dec 2014

Russia thinks its monstrous new super-tank can resist just about all of NATO’s anti-tank weapons

user posted image

Russia’s 3rd-generation battle tank will feature a new version of explosive reactive armor (ERA) capable of resisting widely used Western anti-tank weapons, a source at a leading Russian heavy machinery company told Nikolai Novichkov of IHS Jane’s 360.

The unnamed source at the Russian Tractor Plants, which develops armor for the country’s tanks, told Jane’s that the T-14 Armata battle tank will feature a radically redesigned ERA system that has “no known world equivalents”.

“The new ERA can resist anti-tank gun shells adopted by NATO countries, including the state-of-the-art APFSDS DM53 and DM63 developed by Rheinmetall [and] anti-tank ground missiles with high-explosive anti-tank warheads,” the source told Jane’s.

An ERA uses two plates of armor that sandwich an inner explosive liner on the outside of a vehicle. When a penetrating projectile hits the outer face plate, the explosive liner detonates. This detonation disrupts the enemy projectile by both shifting the plate armor, lowering the incoming projectile’s velocity, and by changing the impact angle of the projectile.

These shifts means the incoming projectile has to penetrate a larger amount of armor, lowering its overall effectiveness.

In addition to the ERA, the Armata will feature an Afganit active protection complex, a system that uses Doppler radar to detect incoming projectiles like rocket-propelled grenades and anti-tank missiles. Once detected, the active defense launches an interceptor rocket that destroys the incoming projectile.

Rossiyskaya Gazeta Online notes that this protection could hypothetically allow the Armata to survive an attack from a US Apache helicopter. But the US Army’s Foreign Military Studies Office takes a more modest view of the tank’s supposed capabilities and concludes that the Afganit system would most likely be capable of defending the tank only from “shaped-charged grenades, antitank missiles, and subcaliber projectiles.”

user posted image

The Armata is also equipped with counter-mine defenses and a suite of high-resolution video cameras. These cameras would allow the Armata operators to have full 360-degree awareness around the body of the vehicle.

The first deliveries of the T-14 started trials with the Russian military in February and March. According to Interfax, large deliveries of the tank will start in 2017 to 2018.

http://www.businessinsider.my/russias-new-...v5jU8vgjKes3.97
BorneoAlliance
post Jun 25 2015, 05:07 AM

New Member
*
Newbie
0 posts

Joined: Dec 2014

71 percent of Vietnamese support the U.S. military presence in Asia

user posted image

From about 1965-1973, U.S. troops fought a war in Vietnam that failed in all its objectives and killed as many as three million Vietnamese citizens. So it's little short of astonishing that fully 71 percent of the Vietnamese population supports the current U.S. military presence in Asia, per a poll from the Pew Research Center:

http://theweek.com/speedreads/562537/71-pe...y-presence-asia

123 Pages « < 39 40 41 42 43 > » 
Bump Topic Topic ClosedOptions New Topic
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0284sec    0.76    6 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 13th December 2025 - 11:12 AM