
This post has been edited by BorneoAlliance: Apr 16 2015, 05:55 PM
Military Thread V16
|
|
Apr 16 2015, 05:55 PM
|
![]()
Newbie
0 posts Joined: Dec 2014 |
Ops Borneo War Exercise
![]() This post has been edited by BorneoAlliance: Apr 16 2015, 05:55 PM |
|
|
Apr 16 2015, 05:59 PM
|
![]()
Newbie
0 posts Joined: Dec 2014 |
A friend whatsapp some pics of A400 M landed at Labuan Airport today with 2 French test pilots
This post has been edited by BorneoAlliance: Apr 16 2015, 06:00 PM |
|
|
Apr 16 2015, 06:26 PM
|
|
Elite
1,157 posts Joined: Jul 2008 From: Petaling Jaya |
|
|
|
Apr 16 2015, 07:21 PM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
127 posts Joined: Aug 2010 |
QUOTE(thpace @ Apr 16 2015, 04:52 PM) why the need to worry?the russians know more about it than malaysia.defence technology has come to a point where the hardware doesn't really matter anymore,there are no longer 'aces' that countries hold that can potentially win a war |
|
|
Apr 16 2015, 07:55 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,964 posts Joined: Apr 2005 From: Sabah, Malaysia. |
QUOTE(atreyuangel @ Apr 16 2015, 05:23 PM) That's like as if Sukhoi just piggy-backed on RMAF's research bureau if that's true, I mean, like the Ruskies didn't even offer their SU-30 "top tier", and we basically ordered what's called the MKM based on SU-30MK, which I think its like this?SU-30M -> SU-30MK (modernization) --> SU-30MKI (India)--->SU-30MKM(malaysia special)--->SU-30SM(upgraded only for russia)-->??? --->SU-30MKA --> SU-30MKK (China) ? Therefore there's a jump in their Sukhoi Program because they piggybacked on Malaysia's base variant? (then again China's version is also interesting) |
|
|
Apr 16 2015, 08:07 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
406 posts Joined: Jun 2007 From: 3°50'**.**"N - 103°16'**.**"E |
QUOTE(hyperyouth_firepower @ Apr 16 2015, 07:55 PM) That's like as if Sukhoi just piggy-backed on RMAF's research bureau if that's true, I mean, like the Ruskies didn't even offer their SU-30 "top tier", and we basically ordered what's called the MKM based on SU-30MK, which I think its like this? well we are the ones that requested the MKM to be tailored to our needsSU-30M -> SU-30MK (modernization) --> SU-30MKI (India)--->SU-30MKM(malaysia special)--->SU-30SM(upgraded only for russia)-->??? --->SU-30MKA --> SU-30MKK (China) ? Therefore there's a jump in their Sukhoi Program because they piggybacked on Malaysia's base variant? (then again China's version is also interesting) technically the Russian are the ones that heads the development of the MKM while the RMAF are only the customer. |
|
|
Apr 16 2015, 09:02 PM
|
![]()
Newbie
4 posts Joined: Jan 2012 |
QUOTE Eurofighter showcases offer of indigenous capability for Indonesia News | 19 hours ago A final assembly facility for the world’s most versatile and reliable fast-jet fighter could be built in Indonesia it has been re-confirmed this week - if the Nation chooses to opt for the Eurofighter Typhoon and the chance to develop its own indigenous capability. As Indonesia plans the replacement of its existing fighter-jet fleet, delegates from Eurofighter arrived in Jakarta over the weekend to begin a series of demonstrations aimed at underlining the full scope of the offer from the four-nation consortium. Central to the unique offer from Eurofighter is the fact the Country already has a strong and productive relationship with one of its Partner Companies, Airbus - makers of a wide range of military and commercial products. Joe Parker, Export Director for Eurofighter GmbH, based in Munich, Germany, said: “We recognise that Indonesia has important decisions to make, and that those decisions will leave a lasting legacy. What we bring to Indonesia is not just reliable protection for the Nation, but the opportunity to build and maintain a genuine indigenous capability on the back of a proven partnership and all that goes with it.” Parker, himself a private pilot, and a passionate advocate of Typhoon, added: “Rapidly deployable and reliable maritime protection is a fundamental requirement for this nation of islands and no other aircraft of this type can fly longer, faster and higher than ours when fully-loaded. Add this to the fact that we would be able to facilitate assembly line capabilities into Bandung enabling the aircraft to be built here in Indonesia by Indonesians and it is easy to see why we believe this a major opportunity making the Indonesian Archipelago a future hub for operations in the Southern Hemisphere.” “We have already hosted visits to see our Spanish and German facilities,” said Parker, “and they were well received. This is an exciting time for the Eurofighter Programme which has now reached a level of maturity giving the Typhoon an unrivalled range of capabilities and a solid roadmap for the future.” This week, for the first time, Eurofighter will be showcasing a Full Scale Exhibition Demonstrator Eurofighter Typhoon when it goes on display in a hangar at PT DI’s facilities in Bandung – the potential location for the Indonesian Eurofighter Typhoon production line. Read more: http://www.eurofighter.com/news-and-events...y-for-indonesia This post has been edited by azriel: Apr 16 2015, 09:04 PM |
|
|
Apr 16 2015, 09:28 PM
|
![]()
Newbie
0 posts Joined: Dec 2014 |
PLA Navy modifies Type 904A supply ship for expanded use ![]() The People's Liberation Army Navy has achieved a new breakthrough in supply vessel technology with the development of two new modified versions of the Type 904A general stores issue ship, reports Duowei News, a US-based Chinese political news outlet. Recently leaked photos show that the two ships have hit the water and remain side by side in a dock undergoing further construction in Guangzhou, capital of southern China's Guangdong province. Compared the to Type 904A Fuxian Lake supply vessel, the new version of the Type 904A has added new aviation support equipment, while its stern appears to have added a new helipad. The Fuxian Lake is largely used to supply materials to PLA outposts on islands and reefs controlled by China, having conducted 10 supply missions between 2009 and 2012. Its presence is considered important given China's aggressive stance in territorial disputes in the South China Sea with Vietnam and the Philippines, and in the East China Sea with Japan. Analysts believe the new 904As should enjoy increased sea time and will be able to engage in a broader range of missions, including the ability to directly supply other ships out at sea. It is also believed that the new Type 904A will have a Type 76 twin 37mm naval gun and enough storage space for one Z-8 heavy transport helicopter. http://www.wantchinatimes.com/news-subclas...000086&cid=1101 |
|
|
Apr 16 2015, 10:44 PM
|
![]()
Junior Member
39 posts Joined: Jun 2008 |
Bad day for asean military aviation? 2 vietnamese Su-22 missing, apart from today indonesian f-16 crash
QUOTE Vietnam rescuers scour sea for missing fighter pilots ![]() (Reuters) - Vietnam launched a search mission on Thursday for two fighter pilots who ejected over the South China Sea during a training exercise involving two Russian-built fighter jets, a provincial official said. The pilots were flying separately in two Sukhoi Su-22 jets but lost contact off the coast of south-central Binh Thuan province around noon local time, the Defence Ministry said. The incident is the latest in a series of setbacks for Vietnam's military, which has seen two fatal helicopter accidents in the past nine months, killing a combined 24 personnel. The Defence Ministry said in a statement that search teams had located four reserve fuel tanks and it was trying to determine what happened. It did not say whether or not the two planes had crashed. Nguyen Hung Tan, chief administrator at the provincial committee for floods and storms prevention, said the pilots had ejected and their whereabouts were unknown. "The two pilots jumped out of the planes and parachuted," Tan told Reuters. http://uk.reuters.com/article/2015/04/16/u...N0N71DI20150416 |
|
|
Apr 16 2015, 11:17 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,210 posts Joined: Aug 2011 |
QUOTE(hyperyouth_firepower @ Apr 16 2015, 07:55 PM) That's like as if Sukhoi just piggy-backed on RMAF's research bureau if that's true, I mean, like the Ruskies didn't even offer their SU-30 "top tier", and we basically ordered what's called the MKM based on SU-30MK, which I think its like this? the original su-30 was develop as a trainer for the su-35. Thus, the twin seater while still able to main full combat roleSU-30M -> SU-30MK (modernization) --> SU-30MKI (India)--->SU-30MKM(malaysia special)--->SU-30SM(upgraded only for russia)-->??? --->SU-30MKA --> SU-30MKK (China) ? Therefore there's a jump in their Sukhoi Program because they piggybacked on Malaysia's base variant? (then again China's version is also interesting) When india goes looking for fighter, ruskies come in and offer their Su-30 base version with modifications to fit India requirement. The MKI was born, this also give Russian experience in modifying planes to customer request. Then china come looking as well, Russia also give what they want a base SU-30 with modification to china needs. The MKK was born When we come in, we have even more unusual request for more western system inside than the MKI. Rather than base on SU-30 base version, It would be faster to take the MKI since it already using some western equipment and modify it to our request. The two prototype of the MKM was preproduction of MKI. While doing so, rusia also develop their own based on MKI and MKM design, Thus, the SM was born for rusian use. We also visiting India MKI before making our purchase so when you say top tier, there no such thing. It all developed as you goes MKI started in 1997 MKK iinm also late 1997 MKM was in early 2003 SM only after MKM and MKI ![]() |
|
|
Apr 16 2015, 11:40 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,302 posts Joined: Oct 2010 From: Over your shoulder |
Islamic State (IS) counteroffensive campaign shocks Iraq and its allies
![]() Iraqi Shiite militiamen advance to battle IS militants forcing their way into Ramadi Although the recent coalition airstrikes and counterattacks by Iraqi military and Shiite militias seems to have pushed back the gains made by the IS in recent campaigns, a sudden and heavy attack made by militants on the city of Ramadi and the nearby oil refinery at Baiji on Monday seems to have taken everyone by surprise. This brings back serious questions on actually how much offensive power IS has and if whether the Iraqi army-Shiite militia alliance is as effective as they portray. Anbar provincial council member Athal al-Fahdawi said the government compound was within range of IS heavy weapons and that it and the city were "in great danger". Thousands of people have fled the escalating violence in Ramadi and the surrounding area in the past week. On Wednesday, IS forces captured three villages on the outskirts of the city. "The city of Ramadi and its government compound are in great danger," he warned. The interior ministry has sent "an urgent response unit", but Mr Fahdawi said the reinforcements were insufficient to repel the jihadists' assault. US-led coalition aircraft are targeting IS positions in villages captured on Wednesday, security officials told AP news agency. This post has been edited by MilitaryMadness: Apr 16 2015, 11:48 PM |
|
|
Apr 17 2015, 06:10 AM
|
![]()
Newbie
0 posts Joined: Dec 2014 |
![]() |
|
|
Apr 17 2015, 06:25 AM
|
![]()
Newbie
0 posts Joined: Dec 2014 |
Why Russia Will Send More Troops To Central Asia ![]() QUOTE Summary Russia is making a concerted effort to increase its military and security presence throughout Central Asia, just not for the reasons it would have you think. Though the Kremlin is concerned with the threat of spillover violence from Islamist militancy in Afghanistan — its purported motive for deploying more troops — it is far more alarmed by what it sees as Chinese and Western encroachment into lands over which it has long held sway. It is this concern that will shape Moscow’s behavior in Central Asia in the years to come. http://www.valuewalk.com/2015/04/russia-tr...n-central-asia/ |
|
|
Apr 17 2015, 08:14 AM
|
![]()
Junior Member
25 posts Joined: Jul 2008 |
![]() |
|
|
Apr 17 2015, 08:16 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
580 posts Joined: Aug 2011 |
QUOTE(thpace @ Apr 16 2015, 11:17 PM) the original su-30 was develop as a trainer for the su-35. Thus, the twin seater while still able to main full combat role SU-30 branched out into 2 main variants. One base on MKK, and the other base on MKI. MKK is a Multi-role fighter optimized for precision strike. It's base on China's requirement. A variant is use by Vietnam, Indonesia, Venezuela and Uganda. When india goes looking for fighter, ruskies come in and offer their Su-30 base version with modifications to fit India requirement. The MKI was born, this also give Russian experience in modifying planes to customer request. Then china come looking as well, Russia also give what they want a base SU-30 with modification to china needs. The MKK was born When we come in, we have even more unusual request for more western system inside than the MKI. Rather than base on SU-30 base version, It would be faster to take the MKI since it already using some western equipment and modify it to our request. The two prototype of the MKM was preproduction of MKI. While doing so, rusia also develop their own based on MKI and MKM design, Thus, the SM was born for rusian use. We also visiting India MKI before making our purchase so when you say top tier, there no such thing. It all developed as you goes MKI started in 1997 MKK iinm also late 1997 MKM was in early 2003 SM only after MKM and MKI ![]() MKI is a true multirole excelled in both strike and air superiority mission, thanks to it's open architecture concept. It was based on India requirement. It is currently use by India, Malaysia and Algeria. So which is better? Russian air force evaluate both and finally choose MKI as a base for their SU-30SM. Algerian MKA is more like MKM than MKI. In fact, it's because we bought the MKM that influence Algeria to choose MKA. The most notable difference between the two is it's radar. The MKK use the Zhuk radar. While the MKI use the heavier Bars radar, Which is why the MKI need for the canard. This post has been edited by MrUbikeledek: Apr 17 2015, 08:21 AM |
|
|
Apr 17 2015, 08:16 AM
|
![]()
Junior Member
25 posts Joined: Jul 2008 |
![]() sos:http://www.oni.navy.mil/Intelligence_Community/china.html |
|
|
Apr 17 2015, 09:12 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,302 posts Joined: Oct 2010 From: Over your shoulder |
PLA navy rescued 600 Chinese and 300 foreign nationals from fighting in Yemen
![]() Chinese and foreign nationals waiting to be evacuated line up to board a Chinese navy warship China's recent mission to evacuate the country's nationals from war-torn Yemen demonstrated substantial growth in the country's power, according to the Guangzhou-based Southern Weekly. Evacuating some 600 Chinese nationals and 300 foreign citizens was not easy task, requiring a high degree of firepower and extreme vigilance, the paper said. The foreign nationals rescued are from Pakistan, Germany, Ireland, Singapore, and the U.K. "An evacuation is not simply about picking up people and getting them on board," the weekly said, noting that the Chinese government had dispatched two Type 054 Frigates, the Linyi and the Weifang, the Type 903 supply ship Weishanhu, two helicopters, and more than 700 personnel, including dozens of special forces soldiers. It is said that the Chinese vessels are redeployed from the international anti-piracy patrols in the Gulf of Aden. The PLA Marines and special forces units deployed successfully secured the port and positioned snipers to ensure the safety of evacuess during the evacuation from the port city of Aden. The successful rescue has generated praise from world leaders and governments. . . . . Meanwhile, US government asking its nationals to seek help on their own or from other countries' embassies. US citizens trapped in Yemen file suit urging the US State Department to rescue them US State Department advises US nationals in Yemen to ask assistance from Indian embassy This post has been edited by MilitaryMadness: Apr 17 2015, 09:15 AM |
|
|
Apr 17 2015, 10:19 AM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
91 posts Joined: Mar 2010 |
Based on the latest post on MalaysianDefence, seem like something major is gonna happen. Any idea?
MalaysianDefence |
|
|
Apr 17 2015, 10:24 AM
|
![]()
Junior Member
25 posts Joined: Jul 2008 |
QUOTE(ks1230 @ Apr 17 2015, 10:19 AM) Based on the latest post on MalaysianDefence, seem like something major is gonna happen. Any idea? Saudi ajak malaysia test bomb yemen. lel.MalaysianDefence |
|
|
Apr 17 2015, 10:46 AM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
72 posts Joined: Jun 2009 From: TDM Noshahr Canal |
|
| Bump Topic Topic ClosedOptions New Topic |
| Change to: | 0.0273sec
0.70
6 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 13th December 2025 - 09:58 AM |