Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Bump Topic Topic Closed RSS Feed

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

> Military Thread V16

views
     
SUSMrUbikeledek
post Mar 12 2015, 01:41 PM

On my way
****
Senior Member
580 posts

Joined: Aug 2011


QUOTE(atreyuangel @ Mar 12 2015, 01:36 PM)
there, there is name of the bomb used lower left of the picture
*
i thought they only painted the kill, not the ammo use.
SUSMrUbikeledek
post Mar 13 2015, 08:24 AM

On my way
****
Senior Member
580 posts

Joined: Aug 2011


QUOTE(thpace @ Mar 12 2015, 06:56 PM)
I think asian here welcome russian than america more
*
Russia is still considered a nominal ally of China. Considering how many countries in east Asia and south east Asia that China have dispute with, many Asian countries will still look to USA to provide counterbalance.
SUSMrUbikeledek
post Mar 16 2015, 09:54 AM

On my way
****
Senior Member
580 posts

Joined: Aug 2011


QUOTE(minizian @ Mar 16 2015, 12:16 AM)
And if i disable the radar array the active protection will be as good as useless?
*
Radar activated mean's the ERA exploded before the round hit the tiles, which mean's when the round hit the tiles, it's already moving outward. When the radar is malfunction, then the ERA will act like a normal ERA tiles. It'll exploded when got hit. But this is less effective than the first method since the force of the round impacting the tiles will absord much of the ERA explosive power.


SUSMrUbikeledek
post Mar 23 2015, 04:11 PM

On my way
****
Senior Member
580 posts

Joined: Aug 2011


QUOTE(remyzero09 @ Mar 23 2015, 03:44 PM)
When i saw it on TV, i wonder if Johor Sultan got one for himself...haha
*
It'll be a shame if Askar Timbalan Setia Negeri Johor buy Attack Helicopter before MAF.
SUSMrUbikeledek
post Mar 25 2015, 06:13 PM

On my way
****
Senior Member
580 posts

Joined: Aug 2011


QUOTE(madoka @ Mar 25 2015, 05:59 PM)
from where you get the reason? any link or sources?
*
I think it's like difference between MILSPEC and COTS. COTS (Commercial of the shelf) use a commercial standard components in a Military hardware. The latest advancement in technology make the use of commercial components in a military equipments feasible. But it still can't beat a precision of a military specific components, which is very expensive. For example, a smart bomb made from COTS usually have the CEP of around 10-20 meters. It's accurate enough to destroy most buildings. But a MILSPEC smartbomb can target a specific window in a specific building.

This post has been edited by MrUbikeledek: Mar 25 2015, 06:19 PM
SUSMrUbikeledek
post Mar 30 2015, 07:14 AM

On my way
****
Senior Member
580 posts

Joined: Aug 2011


QUOTE(BorneoAlliance @ Mar 30 2015, 06:17 AM)
Islamic Republic of Texas? How Jade Helm Could Be a Mock Invasion of Iran

user posted image
http://sputniknews.com/us/20150329/1020185282.html
*
Face to face, they keep conciliatory tone to alay Iran's fear, while behind the scene, they sharpen their dagger to strike.
SUSMrUbikeledek
post Apr 1 2015, 04:01 PM

On my way
****
Senior Member
580 posts

Joined: Aug 2011


QUOTE(waja2000 @ Apr 1 2015, 10:35 AM)
seems depth no enough.  alot people said Russia nuclear Sub can go to 600-700 meter.
*
That's Akula class or known in the west as a Typhoon class. It's titanium hull enable it to dive at depth greater than other submarines in the world. Borey use high tensile steel.

Missile Submarine duty is relatively easier compared to an attack submarine. SSBN only need to stay hidden. SSN/SSK need to hunt down other ships and submarines.
SUSMrUbikeledek
post Apr 1 2015, 04:32 PM

On my way
****
Senior Member
580 posts

Joined: Aug 2011


QUOTE(waja2000 @ Apr 1 2015, 04:11 PM)
good to know....
but 400 meter easy to get trace by ASW sonar which mostly design to scan deep sea until 500 meter depth, that why mostly nuclear Sub design at lease 500 meter or over 500m submerge
*
400 meter is below several layers of thermocline. Most submarine don't have to worry much about the active sonar as the submarine can usually hear the active sonar at far greater distance than the sonar can detect the submarine. The one they need to worry about is passive sonar, especially a ship with "tail". Depth is important if the sub want to move fast. The high water pressure will reduce the chance of cavitation.

This post has been edited by MrUbikeledek: Apr 1 2015, 04:37 PM
SUSMrUbikeledek
post Apr 3 2015, 06:20 AM

On my way
****
Senior Member
580 posts

Joined: Aug 2011


QUOTE(thpace @ Apr 2 2015, 11:51 PM)
US M1 and Iranian T-72S side by side in Tikrit

user posted image

Look legit  hmm.gif  hmm.gif
*
Iraq also operate T-72 la.
SUSMrUbikeledek
post Apr 3 2015, 09:40 AM

On my way
****
Senior Member
580 posts

Joined: Aug 2011


I just heard a rumor. The export version of T-72 doesn't have composite armor, only the space armor. The T-72 armor consist of a 2 layers of steel armor with some empty space in between (space armor). I wonder if our PT-91 also don't have composite armor.
SUSMrUbikeledek
post Apr 7 2015, 03:58 PM

On my way
****
Senior Member
580 posts

Joined: Aug 2011


QUOTE(waja2000 @ Apr 7 2015, 01:21 PM)
lucky leak water should be minimum ....  laugh.gif
*
The sail is suppose to be able to punch through a polar ice cap.

This post has been edited by MrUbikeledek: Apr 7 2015, 03:59 PM
SUSMrUbikeledek
post Apr 9 2015, 01:04 PM

On my way
****
Senior Member
580 posts

Joined: Aug 2011


QUOTE(atreyuangel @ Apr 9 2015, 01:54 AM)
hehe, not to mention the missile it carry

btw, here to give you a brief idea

user posted image

see the similarity, of course the one in F7 are buffed by Hollywood steroids
*
Look's like UH-80 Ghosthawk from ARMA 3
SUSMrUbikeledek
post Apr 9 2015, 04:04 PM

On my way
****
Senior Member
580 posts

Joined: Aug 2011


QUOTE(IReallyNeed Answers @ Apr 9 2015, 03:56 PM)
» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «


a documentary on the family history and development of SU-27 till PAK 50.

almost 50miniute long and don't have crazt fight scene or air combat,

but informative la.
*
You know what's very interesting about SU-27 and MIG-29 design? In most aircraft, they design a fuselage first. And then on this fuselage, they put wings, tailplane. rudder, cockpit engine etc.

But in SU-27 and MIG-29, they design the wing first. They first design a perfect wing. Then they attach engines, cockpit, taiplane etc. After each attachment, they test it in the wind tunnel to see how much of the wing performance was compromise.
SUSMrUbikeledek
post Apr 14 2015, 06:18 AM

On my way
****
Senior Member
580 posts

Joined: Aug 2011


QUOTE(MilitaryMadness @ Apr 13 2015, 03:51 PM)
Family of recruit who died during training to sue SAF for negligence and 'failing to provide a safe training environment'
The guy had severe asthma, which should have disqualifed him for NS in the first place. Discovering he had allergy towards Zinc Chloride was nobody's fault.
*
But he's a track athlete? How can a track athlete have an asthma?
SUSMrUbikeledek
post Apr 14 2015, 03:54 PM

On my way
****
Senior Member
580 posts

Joined: Aug 2011


I got a friend in the army. He currently a platoon leader station in Tawau. I want him to escort me for a trip to Sipadan. Will he be allowed to carry a pistol outside his uniform.
SUSMrUbikeledek
post Apr 17 2015, 08:16 AM

On my way
****
Senior Member
580 posts

Joined: Aug 2011


QUOTE(thpace @ Apr 16 2015, 11:17 PM)
the original su-30 was develop as a trainer for the su-35. Thus, the twin seater while still able to main full combat role

When india goes looking for fighter, ruskies come in and offer their Su-30 base version with modifications to fit India requirement. The MKI was born, this also give Russian experience in modifying planes to customer request.

Then china come looking as well, Russia also give what they want a base SU-30 with modification to china needs. The MKK was born

When we come in, we have even more unusual request for more western system inside than the MKI. Rather than base on SU-30 base version, It would be faster to take the MKI since it already using some western equipment and modify it to our request. The two prototype of the MKM was preproduction of MKI. While doing so, rusia also develop their own based on MKI and MKM design, Thus, the SM was born for rusian use. We also visiting India MKI before making our purchase

so when you say top tier, there no such thing. It all developed as you goes

MKI started in 1997
MKK iinm also late 1997
MKM was in early 2003
SM only after MKM and MKI

user posted image
*
SU-30 branched out into 2 main variants. One base on MKK, and the other base on MKI. MKK is a Multi-role fighter optimized for precision strike. It's base on China's requirement. A variant is use by Vietnam, Indonesia, Venezuela and Uganda.

MKI is a true multirole excelled in both strike and air superiority mission, thanks to it's open architecture concept. It was based on India requirement. It is currently use by India, Malaysia and Algeria.

So which is better? Russian air force evaluate both and finally choose MKI as a base for their SU-30SM.

Algerian MKA is more like MKM than MKI. In fact, it's because we bought the MKM that influence Algeria to choose MKA.

The most notable difference between the two is it's radar. The MKK use the Zhuk radar. While the MKI use the heavier Bars radar, Which is why the MKI need for the canard.

This post has been edited by MrUbikeledek: Apr 17 2015, 08:21 AM
SUSMrUbikeledek
post Apr 20 2015, 03:43 AM

On my way
****
Senior Member
580 posts

Joined: Aug 2011


ASW torpedo range is too short. Unless it is launch from a helicopter, or rocket boosted like the ASROC or the Stallion, it won't be much use against modern Submarine. BTW, why not we get the ASROC. The latest version is vertical launch. I'm sure it can fit inside the Gowind VLS cell.
SUSMrUbikeledek
post Apr 20 2015, 07:28 AM

On my way
****
Senior Member
580 posts

Joined: Aug 2011


QUOTE(thpace @ Apr 20 2015, 04:03 AM)
I was told once that depth charge is more effective on shallow water because sub cant dive further down to hide.

Maybe LTZ can give better insight
*
The lack of range is still an issue. I doubt any half competent sub driver would allow his sub to get that close to an enemy ship. He would've keep it within his arm's length.
SUSMrUbikeledek
post Apr 20 2015, 08:14 AM

On my way
****
Senior Member
580 posts

Joined: Aug 2011


QUOTE(thpace @ Apr 20 2015, 07:58 AM)
That why i looking toward milas system plus sea centor with hard kill and towed sonar. We will one awesome asw ship some thing like the asw fremm of the italian navy.
*
That's what i'm thinking, since our Gowind will be configured for ASW. Maybe our next batch of Gowind will be configured for area air defence.
SUSMrUbikeledek
post Apr 20 2015, 09:40 AM

On my way
****
Senior Member
580 posts

Joined: Aug 2011


QUOTE(BorneoAlliance @ Apr 20 2015, 09:36 AM)
user posted image
*
Are you trying to show the news or are you trying to sell the house? You agent or what?

2 Pages  1 2 >
Bump Topic Topic ClosedOptions New Topic
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0523sec    0.65    7 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 10th December 2025 - 07:37 AM