QUOTE(atreyuangel @ Mar 12 2015, 01:36 PM)
i thought they only painted the kill, not the ammo use.
Military Thread V16
Military Thread V16
|
|
Mar 12 2015, 01:41 PM
Return to original view | Post
#1
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
580 posts Joined: Aug 2011 |
|
|
|
Mar 13 2015, 08:24 AM
Return to original view | Post
#2
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
580 posts Joined: Aug 2011 |
QUOTE(thpace @ Mar 12 2015, 06:56 PM) Russia is still considered a nominal ally of China. Considering how many countries in east Asia and south east Asia that China have dispute with, many Asian countries will still look to USA to provide counterbalance. |
|
|
Mar 16 2015, 09:54 AM
Return to original view | Post
#3
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
580 posts Joined: Aug 2011 |
QUOTE(minizian @ Mar 16 2015, 12:16 AM) Radar activated mean's the ERA exploded before the round hit the tiles, which mean's when the round hit the tiles, it's already moving outward. When the radar is malfunction, then the ERA will act like a normal ERA tiles. It'll exploded when got hit. But this is less effective than the first method since the force of the round impacting the tiles will absord much of the ERA explosive power. |
|
|
Mar 23 2015, 04:11 PM
Return to original view | Post
#4
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
580 posts Joined: Aug 2011 |
|
|
|
Mar 25 2015, 06:13 PM
Return to original view | Post
#5
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
580 posts Joined: Aug 2011 |
QUOTE(madoka @ Mar 25 2015, 05:59 PM) I think it's like difference between MILSPEC and COTS. COTS (Commercial of the shelf) use a commercial standard components in a Military hardware. The latest advancement in technology make the use of commercial components in a military equipments feasible. But it still can't beat a precision of a military specific components, which is very expensive. For example, a smart bomb made from COTS usually have the CEP of around 10-20 meters. It's accurate enough to destroy most buildings. But a MILSPEC smartbomb can target a specific window in a specific building.This post has been edited by MrUbikeledek: Mar 25 2015, 06:19 PM |
|
|
Mar 30 2015, 07:14 AM
Return to original view | Post
#6
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
580 posts Joined: Aug 2011 |
QUOTE(BorneoAlliance @ Mar 30 2015, 06:17 AM) Islamic Republic of Texas? How Jade Helm Could Be a Mock Invasion of Iran Face to face, they keep conciliatory tone to alay Iran's fear, while behind the scene, they sharpen their dagger to strike.![]() http://sputniknews.com/us/20150329/1020185282.html |
|
|
Apr 1 2015, 04:01 PM
Return to original view | Post
#7
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
580 posts Joined: Aug 2011 |
QUOTE(waja2000 @ Apr 1 2015, 10:35 AM) That's Akula class or known in the west as a Typhoon class. It's titanium hull enable it to dive at depth greater than other submarines in the world. Borey use high tensile steel. Missile Submarine duty is relatively easier compared to an attack submarine. SSBN only need to stay hidden. SSN/SSK need to hunt down other ships and submarines. |
|
|
Apr 1 2015, 04:32 PM
Return to original view | Post
#8
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
580 posts Joined: Aug 2011 |
QUOTE(waja2000 @ Apr 1 2015, 04:11 PM) good to know.... 400 meter is below several layers of thermocline. Most submarine don't have to worry much about the active sonar as the submarine can usually hear the active sonar at far greater distance than the sonar can detect the submarine. The one they need to worry about is passive sonar, especially a ship with "tail". Depth is important if the sub want to move fast. The high water pressure will reduce the chance of cavitation.but 400 meter easy to get trace by ASW sonar which mostly design to scan deep sea until 500 meter depth, that why mostly nuclear Sub design at lease 500 meter or over 500m submerge This post has been edited by MrUbikeledek: Apr 1 2015, 04:37 PM |
|
|
Apr 3 2015, 06:20 AM
Return to original view | Post
#9
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
580 posts Joined: Aug 2011 |
|
|
|
Apr 3 2015, 09:40 AM
Return to original view | Post
#10
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
580 posts Joined: Aug 2011 |
I just heard a rumor. The export version of T-72 doesn't have composite armor, only the space armor. The T-72 armor consist of a 2 layers of steel armor with some empty space in between (space armor). I wonder if our PT-91 also don't have composite armor.
|
|
|
Apr 7 2015, 03:58 PM
Return to original view | Post
#11
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
580 posts Joined: Aug 2011 |
|
|
|
Apr 9 2015, 01:04 PM
Return to original view | Post
#12
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
580 posts Joined: Aug 2011 |
|
|
|
Apr 9 2015, 04:04 PM
Return to original view | Post
#13
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
580 posts Joined: Aug 2011 |
QUOTE(IReallyNeed Answers @ Apr 9 2015, 03:56 PM) » Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... « a documentary on the family history and development of SU-27 till PAK 50. almost 50miniute long and don't have crazt fight scene or air combat, but informative la. But in SU-27 and MIG-29, they design the wing first. They first design a perfect wing. Then they attach engines, cockpit, taiplane etc. After each attachment, they test it in the wind tunnel to see how much of the wing performance was compromise. |
|
|
Apr 14 2015, 06:18 AM
Return to original view | Post
#14
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
580 posts Joined: Aug 2011 |
QUOTE(MilitaryMadness @ Apr 13 2015, 03:51 PM) Family of recruit who died during training to sue SAF for negligence and 'failing to provide a safe training environment' But he's a track athlete? How can a track athlete have an asthma?The guy had severe asthma, which should have disqualifed him for NS in the first place. Discovering he had allergy towards Zinc Chloride was nobody's fault. |
|
|
Apr 14 2015, 03:54 PM
Return to original view | Post
#15
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
580 posts Joined: Aug 2011 |
I got a friend in the army. He currently a platoon leader station in Tawau. I want him to escort me for a trip to Sipadan. Will he be allowed to carry a pistol outside his uniform.
|
|
|
Apr 17 2015, 08:16 AM
Return to original view | Post
#16
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
580 posts Joined: Aug 2011 |
QUOTE(thpace @ Apr 16 2015, 11:17 PM) the original su-30 was develop as a trainer for the su-35. Thus, the twin seater while still able to main full combat role SU-30 branched out into 2 main variants. One base on MKK, and the other base on MKI. MKK is a Multi-role fighter optimized for precision strike. It's base on China's requirement. A variant is use by Vietnam, Indonesia, Venezuela and Uganda. When india goes looking for fighter, ruskies come in and offer their Su-30 base version with modifications to fit India requirement. The MKI was born, this also give Russian experience in modifying planes to customer request. Then china come looking as well, Russia also give what they want a base SU-30 with modification to china needs. The MKK was born When we come in, we have even more unusual request for more western system inside than the MKI. Rather than base on SU-30 base version, It would be faster to take the MKI since it already using some western equipment and modify it to our request. The two prototype of the MKM was preproduction of MKI. While doing so, rusia also develop their own based on MKI and MKM design, Thus, the SM was born for rusian use. We also visiting India MKI before making our purchase so when you say top tier, there no such thing. It all developed as you goes MKI started in 1997 MKK iinm also late 1997 MKM was in early 2003 SM only after MKM and MKI ![]() MKI is a true multirole excelled in both strike and air superiority mission, thanks to it's open architecture concept. It was based on India requirement. It is currently use by India, Malaysia and Algeria. So which is better? Russian air force evaluate both and finally choose MKI as a base for their SU-30SM. Algerian MKA is more like MKM than MKI. In fact, it's because we bought the MKM that influence Algeria to choose MKA. The most notable difference between the two is it's radar. The MKK use the Zhuk radar. While the MKI use the heavier Bars radar, Which is why the MKI need for the canard. This post has been edited by MrUbikeledek: Apr 17 2015, 08:21 AM |
|
|
Apr 20 2015, 03:43 AM
Return to original view | Post
#17
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
580 posts Joined: Aug 2011 |
ASW torpedo range is too short. Unless it is launch from a helicopter, or rocket boosted like the ASROC or the Stallion, it won't be much use against modern Submarine. BTW, why not we get the ASROC. The latest version is vertical launch. I'm sure it can fit inside the Gowind VLS cell.
|
|
|
Apr 20 2015, 07:28 AM
Return to original view | Post
#18
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
580 posts Joined: Aug 2011 |
QUOTE(thpace @ Apr 20 2015, 04:03 AM) I was told once that depth charge is more effective on shallow water because sub cant dive further down to hide. The lack of range is still an issue. I doubt any half competent sub driver would allow his sub to get that close to an enemy ship. He would've keep it within his arm's length.Maybe LTZ can give better insight |
|
|
Apr 20 2015, 08:14 AM
Return to original view | Post
#19
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
580 posts Joined: Aug 2011 |
QUOTE(thpace @ Apr 20 2015, 07:58 AM) That why i looking toward milas system plus sea centor with hard kill and towed sonar. We will one awesome asw ship some thing like the asw fremm of the italian navy. That's what i'm thinking, since our Gowind will be configured for ASW. Maybe our next batch of Gowind will be configured for area air defence. |
|
|
Apr 20 2015, 09:40 AM
Return to original view | Post
#20
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
580 posts Joined: Aug 2011 |
|
| Bump Topic Topic ClosedOptions New Topic |
| Change to: | 0.0523sec
0.65
7 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 10th December 2025 - 07:37 AM |