QUOTE(MrUbikeledek @ Mar 12 2015, 01:41 PM)
strike mission kill mark uses the particular bomb as symbol, different from air kills
Military Thread V16
|
|
Mar 12 2015, 01:49 PM
Return to original view | Post
#1
|
![]()
Junior Member
39 posts Joined: Jun 2008 |
|
|
|
Mar 12 2015, 02:11 PM
Return to original view | Post
#2
|
![]()
Junior Member
39 posts Joined: Jun 2008 |
![]() French Rafale parked beside China J-10 That plane tarp though.. looks like batik |
|
|
Mar 13 2015, 05:15 PM
Return to original view | Post
#3
|
![]()
Junior Member
39 posts Joined: Jun 2008 |
|
|
|
Mar 13 2015, 05:40 PM
Return to original view | Post
#4
|
![]()
Junior Member
39 posts Joined: Jun 2008 |
China ships incoming?
QUOTE Malaysia Keen To Buy China Warships ![]() SHAH ALAM: The Government remain keen over plans to procure at least two China made warships for the Royal Malaysian Navy (RMN) although the service did not request for it,industry sources said. The sources told Malaysian Defence that the plan to buy the two warships in the works for the last two years, was proposed by a group of businessmen from both countries supposedly to promote ties between Malaysia and China. Senior defence ministry officials when contacted by Malaysian Defence confirmed the plan but declined further comment. More at [Malaysian Defence] |
|
|
Mar 13 2015, 06:23 PM
Return to original view | Post
#5
|
![]()
Junior Member
39 posts Joined: Jun 2008 |
QUOTE(junchuan @ Mar 13 2015, 06:09 PM) Imagine we send out a fleet of The news source says they would only provide the hull and basic machinery, the weapons would be fitted later by local company2 052d 6 sgpv 2 scorpene 2 support ship I think many would be careful But just imagine the problems of integrating China and France sensors and weapons But if only 2 ships, I would rather they opt for mrss.. rmn really need those types Also mrss is not an offensive platform, so no problem if spratly gone bonkers |
|
|
Mar 14 2015, 03:45 AM
Return to original view | Post
#6
|
![]()
Junior Member
39 posts Joined: Jun 2008 |
|
|
|
Mar 14 2015, 01:44 PM
Return to original view | Post
#7
|
![]()
Junior Member
39 posts Joined: Jun 2008 |
|
|
|
Mar 15 2015, 03:06 PM
Return to original view | Post
#8
|
![]()
Junior Member
39 posts Joined: Jun 2008 |
Two house is reported hit and on fire
This post has been edited by KYPMbangi: Mar 15 2015, 03:07 PM |
|
|
Mar 16 2015, 06:43 AM
Return to original view | Post
#9
|
![]()
Junior Member
39 posts Joined: Jun 2008 |
EC725 performs medevac
![]() Ground casualties.. 2 house (1 partially burned), 1 car (proton iswara) and a cat died.. |
|
|
Mar 16 2015, 06:53 AM
Return to original view | Post
#10
|
![]()
Junior Member
39 posts Joined: Jun 2008 |
|
|
|
Mar 16 2015, 12:37 PM
Return to original view | Post
#11
|
![]()
Junior Member
39 posts Joined: Jun 2008 |
QUOTE(junchuan @ Mar 16 2015, 12:03 PM) The atgm capability is optional, a little upgrade needed for our fcs to fire atgmQUOTE(MilitaryMadness @ Mar 16 2015, 12:11 PM) Another case of 'fitted for but not with'? The correct term is optional Tube-launched ATGM can possibly expand the battle ranges of the PT-91 to 5000 meters. ![]() Msian land contour topology line-of-sight rarely exceeds 3-4km, although its a nice thing to have atgm is much more suitable for less conspicuous platform like the g-wagon |
|
|
Mar 16 2015, 01:07 PM
Return to original view | Post
#12
|
![]()
Junior Member
39 posts Joined: Jun 2008 |
QUOTE(MilitaryMadness @ Mar 16 2015, 12:44 PM) Good point, Malaysia not exactly premier tank combat terrain. Small ambushes here and there by 1-2 tanks or small ATGM teams are more likely than full tank-on-tank brawls. Also did you know the tanks are also trained for non-line of sight fire support? like a short range artillery supportMalaysia should really consider to expand lower-level infantry anti-tank and ATGM capabilities, take advantage of local terrain. The effective firing range is 10-11km, more or less same like our oto melara cannon range |
|
|
Mar 16 2015, 02:56 PM
Return to original view | Post
#13
|
![]()
Junior Member
39 posts Joined: Jun 2008 |
Interesting entry in sipri 2014 for malaysia
![]() |
|
|
Mar 17 2015, 05:37 PM
Return to original view | Post
#14
|
![]()
Junior Member
39 posts Joined: Jun 2008 |
QUOTE(kerolzarmyfanboy @ Mar 17 2015, 05:32 PM) based on what i read, our local company, ATSC decided to cooperate with the Russian RAC MiG to upgrade the MiGs to MiG-29NM If for interim plan? I say yes to thatbut that is ATSC, does gov/TUDM agrees to the plan? i suppork this plan to the fullest~ Fulcrum is my favorite jet~~ But still needs the mrca for long term plan.. |
|
|
Mar 17 2015, 05:42 PM
Return to original view | Post
#15
|
![]()
Junior Member
39 posts Joined: Jun 2008 |
QUOTE(Right Hand Man @ Mar 17 2015, 05:35 PM) This what it means? Lock on 10 and destroy 4? The correct term is track 10 and engage 4Means can release 4 fire-and-forget missiles, one after another upon lock-on? Zhuk-M (Export Designation Zhuk-ME) The N010M Zhuk-M is an advanced variant of the original N010 Zhuk radar introducing advanced air-to-surface functions like mapping and terrain following. The radar forms part of the MiG-29SMT upgrade, the Zhuk-ME finding success on export MiG-29 aircraft to countries like India. The radar features improved signal processing and has a detection range of up to 120 km vs a 5 m2 RCS target for the export variant, and up to 10 targets tracked and up to 4 attacked at once in air-to-air mode.[5] The tracking range is 0.83 - 0.85 of the detection range. In air-to-surface mode the radar can detect a tank from up to 25 km away and a bridge from 120 km away, a naval destroyer could be detected up to 300 km away and up to two surface targets can be tracked at once. The radar has a weight of 220 kg and a scanning area of +/- 85 degrees in azimuth and +56/-40 degrees in elevation. The antenna is an electronically scanned slotted planar array and has a diameter of 624 mm. |
|
|
Mar 17 2015, 06:08 PM
Return to original view | Post
#16
|
![]()
Junior Member
39 posts Joined: Jun 2008 |
|
|
|
Mar 17 2015, 06:17 PM
Return to original view | Post
#17
|
![]()
Junior Member
39 posts Joined: Jun 2008 |
|
|
|
Mar 18 2015, 09:30 AM
Return to original view | Post
#18
|
![]()
Junior Member
39 posts Joined: Jun 2008 |
Dutch AH-64 crashed in Mali
QUOTE The U.N. mission in Mali (MINUSMA) said two Dutch airmen were killed in a AH-64 crash in the north of the country on Mar. 17. ![]() Captain Rene Zeetsen, 30, was killed in the crash and First Lieutenant Ernst Mollinger, 26, died later in a field hospital in Gao from his wounds. The helicopter was taking part in an exercise conducted by the Dutch contingent about 42 km north of the town of Gao. [Alert5] |
|
|
Mar 19 2015, 01:28 AM
Return to original view | Post
#19
|
![]()
Junior Member
39 posts Joined: Jun 2008 |
So rafale ady offer loan and gripen long time ady offer lease.. just take the bait lor..
By this time I dun even care what they select anymore.. just damn get it over with |
|
|
Mar 19 2015, 02:55 PM
Return to original view | Post
#20
|
![]()
Junior Member
39 posts Joined: Jun 2008 |
Looks like the fassmer boat is selected
QUOTE |
| Bump Topic Topic ClosedOptions New Topic |
| Change to: | 0.0569sec
0.31
7 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 5th December 2025 - 05:04 AM |