QUOTE(Skyvi @ Jun 10 2014, 12:17 AM)
Master plan showing phase 2Investment DAMANSARA FORESTA (V2) [OWNERS' THREAD], A new development near Desa ParkCity
Investment DAMANSARA FORESTA (V2) [OWNERS' THREAD], A new development near Desa ParkCity
|
|
Jun 10 2014, 02:02 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,774 posts Joined: Mar 2012 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jun 10 2014, 09:43 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,228 posts Joined: Jan 2009 |
|
|
|
Jun 10 2014, 10:10 PM
Show posts by this member only | IPv6 | Post
#83
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,347 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: in town |
|
|
|
Jun 10 2014, 10:14 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,774 posts Joined: Mar 2012 |
|
|
|
Jun 10 2014, 11:17 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
419 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
|
|
|
Jun 11 2014, 01:42 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
322 posts Joined: Jan 2012 |
QUOTE(CMW123 @ Jun 10 2014, 01:59 PM) Block A & B definitely will be hand over at same time since S&P is signed on same timing too. Block C or D might be later though, as developer would like to avoid LAD, they will hang over even when common facilities not yet complete provided road access & car park is done. Others area to be continue for touch up...just my 2cents. |
|
|
|
|
|
Jun 11 2014, 09:17 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,080 posts Joined: Jun 2010 |
QUOTE(Skyvi @ Jun 11 2014, 02:42 AM) Block A & B definitely will be hand over at same time since S&P is signed on same timing too. Block C or D might be later though, as developer would like to avoid LAD, they will hang over even when common facilities not yet complete provided road access & car park is done. Others area to be continue for touch up...just my 2cents. If I'm planning for the works, I would assign more resources to finish up the podium, car parks and common facilities and less resources on block C and D as there is still time. |
|
|
Jun 11 2014, 09:18 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,774 posts Joined: Mar 2012 |
At the end of the day, it is upto L&G whether they wish to build up a good reputation to spur the sales of subsequent phases
|
|
|
Jun 11 2014, 09:18 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,080 posts Joined: Jun 2010 |
|
|
|
Jun 11 2014, 09:34 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,774 posts Joined: Mar 2012 |
QUOTE(GangHo @ Jun 11 2014, 09:18 AM) If you were to calculate the ratio of the podium footprint versus tower size, Phase 2 is not the lowest density. For residential land, the authorities control by maximum number of units per acreFor Phase 1, 928 units over about 13 acres so that's about 70 over units per acre Doubt that the developer will not max max to the maximum units Maybe Phase 2 will even be higher than the 37 levels of Phase 1 if it's still 8 units per floor to keep the privacy Not forgetting that Phase 2 land is actually lower than Phase 1 ![]() |
|
|
Jun 11 2014, 09:37 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
912 posts Joined: Mar 2011 From: Infinity & Beyond |
how are the elevators like, public(open to all resident) or private(only for the particular block/floor/unit)?
|
|
|
Jun 11 2014, 09:40 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
5,379 posts Joined: Jul 2009 |
QUOTE(Skyvi @ Jun 11 2014, 01:42 AM) Block A & B definitely will be hand over at same time since S&P is signed on same timing too. Block C or D might be later though, as developer would like to avoid LAD, they will hang over even when common facilities not yet complete provided road access & car park is done. Others area to be continue for touch up...just my 2cents. Technically developer got 1 APDL for the entire phase 1, APDL = advertising permit and developing licence. This licence starts on the same day and will be ended on the same day, when developer submit for vacant possession they need to make sure all units are ready as 1 development. The authority will access the entire development in one go when approving the vp, not block by block. If block A and B handovered to home purchasers without the common facilities ready like swimming pool, gym, landscaping, playground, car parks (which all 4 blocks sharing the same building but different floor), then purchasers can file complains to the tribunal on the above matter. The amount safe on LAD is insignificant compared to pay the compensation imposed by tribunal. Furthermore vp can't be obtained if block C and D still under construction due to safety reasons. This development is under Schedule H, unlike those under commercial title like ED, ES where vped given without common facilities ready. My 2 cents |
|
|
Jun 11 2014, 09:41 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,080 posts Joined: Jun 2010 |
QUOTE(CMW123 @ Jun 11 2014, 10:34 AM) For residential land, the authorities control by maximum number of units per acre So you are basically saying that phase 2 will be even higher density if the developer keeps 8 units per floor. For Phase 1, 928 units over about 13 acres so that's about 70 over units per acre Doubt that the developer will not max max to the maximum units Maybe Phase 2 will even be higher than the 37 levels of Phase 1 if it's still 8 units per floor to keep the privacy Not forgetting that Phase 2 land is actually lower than Phase 1 ![]() They might go for bigger unit(i.e. 2000 sq-ft or bigger). That would help to reduce the density. |
|
|
|
|
|
Jun 11 2014, 10:06 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,774 posts Joined: Mar 2012 |
QUOTE(GangHo @ Jun 11 2014, 09:41 AM) So you are basically saying that phase 2 will be even higher density if the developer keeps 8 units per floor. Density is measured by no of units over the size of footprint. Based on below info, total 452 units so not sure about the land size and if its about 50% of phase 1, the density is about the same. Per tower is 226 units. If 226 units over 8 units per floor, that's 28 storey. Plus carpark maybe 3 storey, that would be 31 storey high. But this is duplex so it cannot be (28*2)+4 = 59 storey. So there should be more than 8 units per floor becoz for a 1200 duplex unit, it could be 700 sf lower and 500 sf upper. They might go for bigger unit(i.e. 2000 sq-ft or bigger). That would help to reduce the density. The Foresta Phase 2, consisting two condominium towers of 452 units, has a target gross development value of RM500mil. “The units are between 1,200 sq ft (sf) to 2,000 sf and while we have not finalised the selling price as it will be launched a year from now, we’re estimating a range from RM700 per sf.” |
|
|
Jun 11 2014, 12:43 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,080 posts Joined: Jun 2010 |
QUOTE(CMW123 @ Jun 11 2014, 11:06 AM) Density is measured by no of units over the size of footprint. Based on below info, total 452 units so not sure about the land size and if its about 50% of phase 1, the density is about the same. Per tower is 226 units. If 226 units over 8 units per floor, that's 28 storey. Plus carpark maybe 3 storey, that would be 31 storey high. But this is duplex so it cannot be (28*2)+4 = 59 storey. So there should be more than 8 units per floor becoz for a 1200 duplex unit, it could be 700 sf lower and 500 sf upper. Very clear analysis. Thanks! Totally agree with what you said above.The Foresta Phase 2, consisting two condominium towers of 452 units, has a target gross development value of RM500mil. “The units are between 1,200 sq ft (sf) to 2,000 sf and while we have not finalised the selling price as it will be launched a year from now, we’re estimating a range from RM700 per sf.” From naked eye, i judge that phase 2 footprint is less than 50% of phase 1. This post has been edited by GangHo: Jun 11 2014, 12:44 PM |
|
|
Jun 11 2014, 02:04 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
438 posts Joined: Apr 2013 |
QUOTE(CMW123 @ Jun 11 2014, 10:06 AM) Density is measured by no of units over the size of footprint. Based on below info, total 452 units so not sure about the land size and if its about 50% of phase 1, the density is about the same. Per tower is 226 units. If 226 units over 8 units per floor, that's 28 storey. Plus carpark maybe 3 storey, that would be 31 storey high. But this is duplex so it cannot be (28*2)+4 = 59 storey. So there should be more than 8 units per floor becoz for a 1200 duplex unit, it could be 700 sf lower and 500 sf upper. there is some correction, for residential area the density is base on the population per acre. Standard is 400 org / acre. All majlis do hav tolerance for how many people per unit but as standard is 5/unit. The Foresta Phase 2, consisting two condominium towers of 452 units, has a target gross development value of RM500mil. “The units are between 1,200 sq ft (sf) to 2,000 sf and while we have not finalised the selling price as it will be launched a year from now, we’re estimating a range from RM700 per sf.” So just an example: for phase 1 total land will be 13 acre density allow for residential will be 400 people / acre number people / unit will be 5 = 13 acre x 400 /5 = the max unit will be around 1040. this is a norm for calculation just sharing. u all may try other project it wont be much difference. back to the phase 2 if the unit is 452 than the land size will be 452 x 5 /400 = around 5.65 acre so if the developer tell u his project is low density than it should have much much less than 400/acre if not it is tipu nia. |
|
|
Jun 11 2014, 03:17 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,114 posts Joined: Aug 2010 From: Edge Of D. World |
What is the price PSF that existing buyers paid? Can share?
|
|
|
Jun 11 2014, 05:51 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,080 posts Joined: Jun 2010 |
QUOTE(lch78 @ Jun 11 2014, 04:17 PM) I bought at about RM6xx per sqftThe initial price started from RM400 per sqft(lowest floor) onward during launching as the higher floors were fetching higher price. You could refer to propwall for further info. |
|
|
Jun 11 2014, 07:24 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,228 posts Joined: Jan 2009 |
|
|
|
Jun 11 2014, 08:02 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,774 posts Joined: Mar 2012 |
From the project video, the roof garden looks very plain and with few waterproof sofa only
No landscape, No oomph at all... |
| Change to: | 0.0216sec
0.43
6 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 5th December 2025 - 04:34 AM |