Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

9 Pages  1 2 3 > » Bottom

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

Investment DAMANSARA FORESTA (V2) [OWNERS' THREAD], A new development near Desa ParkCity

views
     
GangHo
post May 26 2014, 04:06 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,080 posts

Joined: Jun 2010


The subsequent phases have smaller podiums. It will be interesting to see how the design going to be.
GangHo
post May 29 2014, 04:47 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,080 posts

Joined: Jun 2010


There is a growing interest among on the younger generation on high rise residential building especially for the strategic location.

Those building designed with more durable materials coupled with good management will be favored for years to come.
GangHo
post May 30 2014, 11:56 AM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,080 posts

Joined: Jun 2010


QUOTE(CMW123 @ May 26 2014, 08:09 PM)
Subsequent phases although with smaller podium but also have less towers...hope they will come up with interesting design becoz of its height, foresta is quite visible from 360 degrees
*
even if you have 2 units per floor, your view is limited to 90 degree.

if you have one unit per floor, your view is limited to 180 degree.

if you want to have 360 degree, you need to combine the two penthouses from 2 block into one unit.
GangHo
post Jun 3 2014, 11:32 AM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,080 posts

Joined: Jun 2010


QUOTE(fongozic @ Jun 3 2014, 04:37 AM)
[attachmentid=3997416][attachmentid=3997415]

Latest update...
*
NIce! It's going to be a BEAUTY!
GangHo
post Jun 3 2014, 09:59 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,080 posts

Joined: Jun 2010


QUOTE(CMW123 @ Jun 3 2014, 09:39 PM)
Already need to pay monthly maintenance fee for the 14xx unit at RM0.25 psf at RM350 still need to pay some more?

How come no such thing mentionbefore we sign S&P?

Is it not developer duty to maintain the forest which is not under the master title of phase 1 as previously represented to the buyers. If it is not common property under the Building & Common Property Act, do they have the legal right to charge?

Let's fight...
*
wink.gif mad.gif Let's fight
GangHo
post Jun 4 2014, 10:14 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,080 posts

Joined: Jun 2010


QUOTE(godlikexioo @ Jun 4 2014, 04:44 PM)
For public area since owner have paying the cukai pintu dan cukai tanah the cost should inclusive all the maintenance for infra & environment. 
But if during the construction for the entire project the forest have not handover to MBPJ as public area it should under developer maintenance.
As it is still private property and it should under developer own cost to maintain the forest than it is make sense.
*
Whatever maintenance fees; Even if it is stated in our contract but it is not a norm, it is the duty of the developer to make known to us start from the beginning before we sign the S&P. Otherwise it is not bona fide business.
GangHo
post Jun 5 2014, 01:59 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,080 posts

Joined: Jun 2010


QUOTE(1282009 @ Jun 4 2014, 10:20 PM)
By the way, looking at 1 of the pictures, why the balcony is concrete design instead of full glass panel?  hmm.gif
*
Please refer to the attached photo. You mean the clouded portion?

I would think that somebody needs to zoom in and take a closer picture before any conclusion could be made.

It could must well be some sort of protection paper that cause it to look like concrete from afar.


Attached thumbnail(s)
Attached Image
GangHo
post Jun 6 2014, 09:45 AM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,080 posts

Joined: Jun 2010


QUOTE(1282009 @ Jun 6 2014, 12:12 AM)
Yup that is the part I was referring to. I might drop by this weekend to have a closer look ..
*
Can't recall any concrete railing designed that way. Especially with such a big opening, it is hazardous. And the old balustrade railing is totally out of fashion and does not suit the facade of the building at all.
GangHo
post Jun 6 2014, 10:43 AM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,080 posts

Joined: Jun 2010


QUOTE(calvinyeap @ Jun 6 2014, 11:35 AM)
Do update us with your findings ya... smile.gif
*
Believe those should be framingg for the glass panels.
GangHo
post Jun 6 2014, 04:57 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,080 posts

Joined: Jun 2010


Would think that Damansara Foresta price would stay strong due to the following reasons:-

1) Unique design - with those jungle trekking, special designed park opposite the development.

2) the very few freehold land left in the area.

3) Award winning - best residential tower.

4) Expanding Damansara development attracting more local and foreigners.
GangHo
post Jun 7 2014, 10:48 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,080 posts

Joined: Jun 2010


In terms of residential property, I would think that the apartment/condo/residence with small build-up could be hit first. I would consider those property as higher risk.

A lot of ppl has bought this sort of properties because of the low entry level. Some might not have evaluated whether there is such a need in the market.

But then again, i believe that whatever crisis we are talking should be short-live(maybe 2-3 years) in my opinion.

This post has been edited by GangHo: Jun 7 2014, 10:49 PM
GangHo
post Jun 8 2014, 10:40 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,080 posts

Joined: Jun 2010


QUOTE(CMW123 @ Jun 8 2014, 11:22 AM)
Investment n rental value depends on lots of factors of the project itself as well as vs its competitors catering to the same clientele group. Location, amenities, local demographics, rental n subsale price, demand vs supply etc. Size is only one factor

For foresta, 928 units of 3 rooms family size. So bachelor, single expat, just married couple n those without 3k budget etc are ruled out. Unlikely to be cash flow positive for late buyers. Hopefully at least 50% own stayers upon 1st year of vp. Perhaps can attract more sri damansara residents or their second generation to switch from intermediate terrace to condo with facilities.

Forsee lower value for block A side facing phase 2 as after vp will be staring at the construction n block D facing highway n west sun
*
thumbup.gif Totally agree with you.

It's just that i feel that the supply for small units have been too many and that market might not be able to absorb it. The last time i checked on Scott Garden, it was really empty.

This post has been edited by GangHo: Jun 8 2014, 10:40 PM
GangHo
post Jun 10 2014, 01:01 AM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,080 posts

Joined: Jun 2010


QUOTE(Skyvi @ Jun 9 2014, 01:15 AM)
Here a closer look to clarify your query...
[attachmentid=4005545]
[attachmentid=4005552]
[attachmentid=4005567]
[attachmentid=4005585]
*
So the conclusion there will be glass panels for the balcony, right?
GangHo
post Jun 10 2014, 01:05 AM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,080 posts

Joined: Jun 2010


QUOTE(Sikit2JadiBukit @ Jun 8 2014, 11:47 PM)
means The Zest not empty? Bukit 9 Utama not empty? Armanee Damai not empty?  brows.gif

how to conclude small size a failure without looking at the big picture?  whistling.gif
*
I'm not making conclusion, it is just my view.

I never touch the smaller units.

This is because I feel that there is no so many local rich singles that would purchase those units. This is more to luxury lifestyle.

As for the bigger units, the husband and wife for the sake of the family will fork out the money to purchase a "home". it is a basic need.

This post has been edited by GangHo: Jun 10 2014, 01:05 AM
GangHo
post Jun 10 2014, 12:48 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,080 posts

Joined: Jun 2010


We have discussed this matter in earlier tread. I would think that the developer has got its own planning but they will not commit any final date at this moment. The most diplomatic answer is," check your S&P agreement"

If the construction is on/ahead of schedule, of course handing over all at the same time would be best. However, nobody will know until the end whether the contractor will complete the works on time. Or they might face problem fulfilling authority requirement.
GangHo
post Jun 11 2014, 09:17 AM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,080 posts

Joined: Jun 2010


QUOTE(Skyvi @ Jun 11 2014, 02:42 AM)
Block A & B definitely will be hand over at same time since S&P is signed on same timing too. Block C or D might be later though, as developer would like to avoid LAD, they will hang over even when common facilities not yet complete provided road access & car park is done. Others area to be continue for touch up...just my 2cents.
*
If I'm planning for the works, I would assign more resources to finish up the podium, car parks and common facilities and less resources on block C and D as there is still time.
GangHo
post Jun 11 2014, 09:18 AM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,080 posts

Joined: Jun 2010


QUOTE(CMW123 @ Jun 10 2014, 11:14 PM)
Yes, total 12 towers. Phase 2 lowest density with 2 towers
*
If you were to calculate the ratio of the podium footprint versus tower size, Phase 2 is not the lowest density.
GangHo
post Jun 11 2014, 09:41 AM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,080 posts

Joined: Jun 2010


QUOTE(CMW123 @ Jun 11 2014, 10:34 AM)
For residential land, the authorities control by maximum number of units per acre

For Phase 1, 928 units over about 13 acres so that's about 70 over units per acre

Doubt that the developer will not max max to the maximum units

Maybe Phase 2 will even be higher than the 37 levels of Phase 1 if it's still 8 units per floor to keep the privacy

Not forgetting that Phase 2 land is actually lower than Phase 1

[attachmentid=4008628]
*
So you are basically saying that phase 2 will be even higher density if the developer keeps 8 units per floor.

They might go for bigger unit(i.e. 2000 sq-ft or bigger). That would help to reduce the density.
GangHo
post Jun 11 2014, 12:43 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,080 posts

Joined: Jun 2010


QUOTE(CMW123 @ Jun 11 2014, 11:06 AM)
Density is measured by no of units over the size of footprint. Based on below info, total 452 units so not sure about the land size and if its about 50% of phase 1, the density is about the same. Per tower is 226 units. If 226 units over 8 units per floor, that's 28 storey. Plus carpark maybe 3 storey, that would be 31 storey high. But this is duplex so it cannot be (28*2)+4 = 59 storey. So there should be more than 8 units per floor becoz for a 1200 duplex unit, it could be 700 sf lower and 500 sf upper. 
The Foresta Phase 2, consisting two condominium towers of 452 units, has a target gross development value of RM500mil. “The units are between 1,200 sq ft (sf) to 2,000 sf and while we have not finalised the selling price as it will be launched a year from now, we’re estimating a range from RM700 per sf.”
*
Very clear analysis. Thanks! Totally agree with what you said above.

From naked eye, i judge that phase 2 footprint is less than 50% of phase 1.

This post has been edited by GangHo: Jun 11 2014, 12:44 PM
GangHo
post Jun 11 2014, 05:51 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,080 posts

Joined: Jun 2010


QUOTE(lch78 @ Jun 11 2014, 04:17 PM)
What is the price PSF that existing buyers paid? Can share?
*
I bought at about RM6xx per sqft

The initial price started from RM400 per sqft(lowest floor) onward during launching as the higher floors were fetching higher price.

You could refer to propwall for further info.



9 Pages  1 2 3 > » Top
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0621sec    0.20    7 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 4th December 2025 - 02:56 AM