QUOTE(pehkay @ Oct 6 2014, 10:47 AM)
1) Matthew 5:14 You are the light of the world. It is impossible for a city situated upon a mountain to be hidden.
Clearly it is referring to believers lor. You are the lamp shinning (a believer) out in your living.
2) Deja vu on your " lamps as believers because Jesus states that the Bridegroom did not know them"
https://forum.lowyat.net/index.php?act=ST&f...post&p=68868677
Didn't you made similar statement and can't come up with a reason ... that the Lord called them worker's of lawlessness and do not know them (The target audience are believers - Why were we be workers of the Lord if we aren't?)
3) "The passage on the wise and foolish is most likely to refer to people who did not stay the course. They could have some knowledge of Christianity and could even be believers at one point of time but then they decided to not stay on the path. By the time Christ comes, it would be too late. Jesus was telling us that we should always stay on the course."
Isn't this arminism? Then God's salvation is not effective?
4) Laodicea mentioned that we need to pay a price .... which corresponding to the virgin buying oil to be an overcomer. Like you mentioned ... they are believers
What broke the camel's back was probably 2) ... lol
I stop because it doesn't benefit you nor others. If you have a all-surpassing framework that can explain all the verses I brought up. Please do so that I can be enlightened.
--------------------------------
At the end, it was never about initial salvation. That is clear that we are saved by faith. We are saved eternally. The sense of security was never about our eternal salvation.
Then, please explain one verse (for now) in James 2 that says that Abraham was justified by works? Definitely this is not initial salvation.
Well.
1) Yes it is referring to believers but then it differs from what you are teaching. If I can recall, you were talking about the 10 Virgins. You were comparing this verse to the passage of the 10 virgins. So what does this has got to do with the virgins and their oil lamps? You see, knowing operus mondi, you will always twist even what you said earlier just to confuse everyone. Again you can confuse others but not me.
2)I have already proven that when Jesus says that he does not knows someone, it means that this person is not His in other words not a believer.
No. Look carefully at the verse. The "workers of iniquity" claims that they did a lot of things under the name of Christ but then Christ did not acknowledge their works. He treated everything they did as iniquity. You see, people like you think that they are doing a lot of work for Christ. But then, when the day comes you will be surprised that Christ will also say that you are a worker on iniquity.
3)So you even know my theology as well. Good Job. It just prove that you do not want to discuss with me because discussing with me will make you look bad. You know that I am not one of those people who get trick so easily and that is why you only discuss with people who are weak in their theology and not me. Nope. Not every person who calls themselves Christians are believers. Not every person who appear to serve the church are believers. In fact the parable of the seed should have given you a clue. Again, you do not even understand the basic calvanistic argument.
4)Nope, as mentioned earlier. Laocidea is talking about God's discipline in this age and not the next. God disciplines his Children but we do not need to be overcomers because the work has already been done on the cross. God can perfect us even though we ourself are not perfected just like the thief on the cross. Christ told the thief that he will in paradise today. There's no maturing process required for the thief. It's pretty clear that you are spreading false hood.
There's nothing that breaks the Camel's back. Actually what break the Camel's back is that you choose to take a previous argument that we had ages ago and use it to substantiate your current argument. If you are confident of yourself why do that? Very simple. You need to defend falsehood because there is no turning back after all.
Nope. God wants us to secure in our faith. There is no need for perfection in the next life. God can perfect us immediately after we die as shown by the verse I provided.
Anyway, James 2 is talking about demonstration of faith through works. The whole new testament talks about justification through faith and here you only have 1 verse that demonstrate works. Now I have been saying all along. That faith needs to be demonstrated through works. In fact, I have always said that when one comes to faith, naturally, he will love the law too because he understands that the law was created by God not only for being obedient to God but then also in order to benefit him. But then while I was debating with UW, you have been silent all this while. The thing is you know you have to be silent because if not then it will be your turn. See, even now your conscience has been seared just so that you can keep your position over here.
Hebrews 11.
Now, you see. When Abraham offers his Son to the alter, it was actually mainly due to faith. It was because of his faith, that he trusted God and offer his Son. God was actually demonstrating that Abraham was faithful. It's got nothing to do with maturity my friend.
Similarly, when we serve in faith as Christians in the church or even in the office, people will be able to see our fruits and thus we will be rewarded in this way. Nothing too complex there.
You see, there. It's so obvious to me that you are not willing to answer me because answering me will lead you to question your own beliefs because your beliefs were not founded upon God's Word. But then your conscience has been seared to such a degree that you now have to discredit me just so as to defend yourself. It's amazing how when people are starting to lose their credibility, they will resort to all kind of things.
Why do I have to come out with a framework? I follow the word of God. I do not create a framework and fit God's word in the framework like how Watchman nee does. You did not come out with any framework. You are just a follower of one. That's all.
The thing is you can only spread falsehood for so long. Eventually when the light shines on darkness, darkness will be exposed.
And I know you are just going to stay silent for a while and then when question further just come out and say that I did not prove anything. That is your operus mondi anyway. You do not have the balls to carry on with the discussion and have to resort to those tactics.
This post has been edited by sylar111: Oct 6 2014, 04:56 PM
Oct 6 2014, 04:24 PM

Quote
0.0352sec
0.74
6 queries
GZIP Disabled