Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Bump Topic Topic Closed RSS Feed
10 Pages  1 2 3 > » Bottom

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 LYN Christian Fellowship V7 (Group), Bible Hope never disappoints!

views
     
SUSsylar111
post Jun 22 2014, 02:46 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,547 posts

Joined: Jun 2008
From: KL


Just curious. What do you guys think about psychiatry.
Thanks
SUSsylar111
post Jun 22 2014, 05:21 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,547 posts

Joined: Jun 2008
From: KL


QUOTE(De_Luffy @ Jun 22 2014, 08:32 AM)
in what term?
*
Do you think psychiatry is anti christian.

SUSsylar111
post Jun 22 2014, 06:49 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,547 posts

Joined: Jun 2008
From: KL


QUOTE(pehkay @ Jun 22 2014, 06:01 PM)
Erm .... it is just to treat the soul. Though historically, it has its issues and controversy. I think it is the same with Psychology though psychiatry deals more with mental disorder.
Well, .... it's good to know that you are a tripartite man (spirit, soul and body). Even if a Christian is strong in his/her spirit, a problem in their soul (psychologically) will still override any benefits in their experience of Christ. All three parts of our being needs to be proper and functioning (c.f. 1 Thes. 5:23) to be useful to the Lord and also to pursue Him.

We should not try to spiritualize things. If we have problems like depression or psychological problems, please, seek medical expertise. Because Satan will use the severely damaged and fallen soul to contemplate suicide (for example). No matter, how high or how deep your experience of Christ in your spirit, if the soul or the body is destroyed, your Christian life ends there.

Once their soul (psychology) is "treated", then the experience of the Lord's grace and the prayers of the believers (in the spirit) is needed to overcome the problem.
*
So you feel that the bible itself is not able to treat the soul. I am pretty sure I can find many verses that states that the bible is able to treat the soul.

So you feel that something that actually contradicts the bible can actually treat the soul. Because remember the people who started psychiatry are not really holy people.

I do not believe that a Christian will commit suicide though. Because it would probably mean that the Holy Spirit was not really guiding him. Of course there may be cases whereby a Christian may commit suicide due to a sudden impact or something but then to say that a Christian will commit suicide as an end to a means(longer period) I think is pretty absurd because if that is the case, then what is so different with a Christian compared to the rest of the world.

You mention that you should seek medical expertise. Do you even know what happens to a person after he undergo psychiatric treatment. Do you know what happens when a person is on medication. Do you even know that electric shock treatment was one of the treatment in psychiatry before. Do you understand how psychiatric medication works? D

Why would you think that (psychiatric) self motivation books are better then the bible even though there are so many verses in the bible that is supposed to lift up the spirit(motivate) a believer.

Ok I am just going to stop with my aggressive stance over here as my aim is just to find out whether this thread is suitable for me.

PS:Just asking. Because I think many of you perhaps know my stance towards psychiatry. I am just asking to see what is your stance generally as a group.

This post has been edited by sylar111: Jun 22 2014, 07:12 PM
SUSsylar111
post Jun 22 2014, 08:24 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,547 posts

Joined: Jun 2008
From: KL


QUOTE(pehkay @ Jun 22 2014, 07:53 PM)
sweat.gif Whoah I think you just need to step back a bit and stand on my shoe tongue.gif

Seriously, I don't know you or any of your stance. I just shared my opinion. This is just my opinion and not the group here [though why do you need to see if you are suitable here?? Are you a Christian? ]

Also, IMHO, your stance might have cause you assume that I made statement that I DO NOT make smile.gif

Firstly, I did not say "feel that the bible itself is not able to treat the soul". There are quite a few verses, especially, the Spirit giving life to our mind and renews them.  But the condition requires as in Romans 8, to set our mind on the spirit. If our mind is in a bad condition, there is no need to say how one can experience the Spirit's life.

I know of some of controversy in psychiatric like you mentioned. I think we can make some judgement not to go for electrical shock. On the other extreme, if there is a real need for some treatment, we should not superstitiously say it is not Biblical or something.

But on the other hand, I also know those who benefited from the medication because he or she suffers from schizophrenia. Then he/she is "sober" enough to continue to experience the Lord.

Also, I didn't say that psychiatry books are more important than the Bible.  sweat.gif Personally, if you read my sharing from the Gospel of John, you will see the self-help books in general are useless.

Lastly, this thread is about sharing on the experiences of Christ for the building up of the church. It is not about psychiatry or a collection of like-minded people tongue.gif
*
I think the answer whether I am a Christian or not is pretty obvious.
And just because I am a Christian that does not mean that I need to take part in a forum just because it claims to be a Christian. (PS I think you are pretty much insulting me because you are claiming that I am not a christian even though from my post so far, it is pretty obvious that I am one. You would most likely deny this but then I know you are doing that because there is no reason for you to make that statement that you make. Can you stop doing this because this is a Christian forum?)

I think as Christian if we cannot even agree on the most basic things, then whatever encouragement that you give to me will look to be shallow. Sorry to say this. That is why I need to see what the majority of the people think about this. Not just you. Because I am pretty sure that there are many others who would not have the same view as you but the thing is that if generally we are not agreeable in most things, I think the fellowship is pretty much useless.

I have already proven to you that psychiatry actually advocates electric shock treatment. If psychiatry was not dangerous, it would not have advocate this kind of treatment. The fact that you are not willing to investigate psychiatry on whether it is dangerous even though it advocates something dangerous, shows that you are not willing to accept whether psychiatry is dangerous.

Your assumption is that psychiatry will make a person's mind sober enough. Have you actually studied psychiatry enough to know this. Because my understanding is that for Schizhophrenia treatment, what the medication does is that it slows down neuron transmission. In other words, the person appear to be less agitated but in actual fact, he becomes less sensitive. He may appear sober, but he would not be able to understand what the pastors or even what his brothers and sisters are saying from a basic intellectual level much more a spiritual level.

I think you are saying that not following psychiatry is superstitious because psychiatry happens to be in the mainstream. I think saying that something is acceptable without FINDING OUT whether it is acceptable is superstitious. Dun you think so?

I never said that psychiatry is the main discussion topic. I am just using this topic to evaluate whether this forum is suitable for me. Because to me, if you are preaching Christianity but yet at the same time accept mainstream as the truth and do not QUESTION them, then to me, this is not real Christianity. Because I think we are supposed to be the light of the world and if we are not even willing to speak against lies but are even willing to accept those lies in the first place, then to me, the foundation is not firm in the first place and I think it will collapse over time.
SUSsylar111
post Jun 22 2014, 08:27 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,547 posts

Joined: Jun 2008
From: KL


QUOTE(pehkay @ Jun 22 2014, 08:25 PM)
Our spirit cannot be sick smile.gif. That is the only place Satan cannot touch.

Our soul is another story. Since the fall, it is in terrible shape tongue.gif
*
And the soul has been treated by Christian Councillors for a long period of time even before psychiatry was founded.
SUSsylar111
post Jun 22 2014, 08:32 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,547 posts

Joined: Jun 2008
From: KL


The other thing I wish to highlight. Many of the mass gun shootings has been shown to be caused by psychotic medications. Of course the argument is that those people are already mentally ill and thus it was they themselves who was fully at fault. But I would leave you guys to study more if you are interested in this.

And I would like to highlight, often times, psychotic medication makes people even more depress over time even though they seem calmer. But then the ends is more important then the means right?

To be honest, this is really the first time I ever heard that psychiatry actually helps the soul. What more from a fellow Christian brother.

This post has been edited by sylar111: Jun 22 2014, 08:33 PM
SUSsylar111
post Jun 22 2014, 11:04 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,547 posts

Joined: Jun 2008
From: KL


QUOTE(pehkay @ Jun 22 2014, 08:42 PM)
Seriously  sweat.gif I really think you need to reread what I post. I did not accuse you of anything.
Erm ... fellowship is the flow of the divine life. It is not to be agreeable. I meant, if you meet a vegetarian brother, we don't condemn him of his weak faith, but continue to fellowship with him. Unless it is sinful, divisive or worldly.
Then, don't go for psychiatry then.  rolleyes.gif
Again, I did not say that that not following psychiatry is superstitious. Whoah, it is really hard when you are making statements like this. I don't even know what you meant by mainstream? Whether one make a decision to get some help from psychological consultation is between him and the Lord and finding OUT whether it entails ... Really, you are putting words that I do not say.
Who say about one NOT making an informed decision?  tongue.gif <Sigh> Christianity is neither about NOT accepting mainstream as truth or question them ... bro, it is about God's purpose and the revelation of Himself. Once we see this, we will see the the world is against it.

Anyway, I am done responding on this.

Cheers!
*
Well you did ask me whether I am a Christian. If I ask you the same question, would you find it insulting. I guess you would especially in this kind of setting. I would not have posted what I have posted if I was a non believer. Perhaps you did not meant it, but then you perhaps make that claim because you are in disagreement of what I have said. If I did not make a claim in this setting, you would not have question my faith.

Well, truth is absolute. I would not condemned a vegetarian brother of weak faith, but then I would not take what he says seriously as well. I mean if a brother lacks basic understanding in this aspect, you would not really trust his understanding in the other spiritual aspects. Of course I will not doubt his salvation and will continue to treat him as a brother but that does not mean I will not treat his words cautiously.

Well. I wrote that to arrr counter your argument on psychiatry. You could just admit you do not understand instead of putting remarks like that. It tells a lot right?

You did say the following statement "we should not superstitiously say it is not Biblical or something." As a Christian, can you at least have some basic integrity? Because now I am even more doubtful of you.

Actually, the bible does tell us to examine everything. And yes, a Christian is supposed to question the mainstream because we know that man are sinful. So basically, many of what the mainstream does is not really out of good intent even though many people would not see that because they do not understand that man are intrinsically sinful. Since we are the light of the world, we should expose those lies outwardly.

And as Christians we are supposed to differentiate ourselves with the world. We are supposed to let the world know ultimately that we are different from them. And looking at your explanations, I see that you are not doing that.

Seems like this is looking more and more like RWI
SUSsylar111
post Jun 22 2014, 11:30 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,547 posts

Joined: Jun 2008
From: KL


QUOTE(pehkay @ Jun 22 2014, 09:04 PM)
It is actually the fastest way to hell for unbelievers. Then again, it is extremely RARE for one who touch his spirit when he/she believe in the Lord to. A strong salvation usually has a good foundation even if ones backslides.

Hypothetically, if he is saved [really touch the Lord, receive Him into him AND NOT A INHERITED/FAMILY RELIGION and commit suicide], he is still saved but DEFINITELY not a mature Christian. He will be punished dispensationally in the millennium.
LOL, still have to response to your salvation question ... my bad, sis.
*
If someone is punished, it means that this person still has sins. When a person has died in his sins, he is basically condemned.

A true Christian will still enter into heaven even though he has committed suicide. He may not be rewarded as much though but he will still enter heaven. Basically all his sins are forgiven and so there is nothing to be punished

Incredible. This is really getting to be an eyeopener
SUSsylar111
post Jun 23 2014, 12:15 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,547 posts

Joined: Jun 2008
From: KL


QUOTE(14-9-2015 @ Jun 23 2014, 12:03 AM)
Hi Sylar,

I'm not gonna comment on the psychiatry part mainly because my knowledge is too shallow on the said topic. Just been sitting on the sidelines to see how others respond.

I do however feel that if a saved person commits suicide, God will still accept them into his open arms on the other side. I agree with you. On how it could be possible for Christians to commit suicide, it could be due to extreme duress or a sudden moment of terrible weakness maybe?
Since we are still living in the flesh on this Earth & are susceptible to sin? 

p.s.      i don't know any or have yet to hear of any Christians committing suicide.
p.p.s.  i do follow your posts occasionally under the other sections & i enjoy your debates.
*
Well. It's possible for a Christian to commit suicide. But then what I believe is that as you said, it is most likely a sudden moment of weakness whereby the Christian does not have time to contemplate. If a Christian did have time to contemplate, it would be very much more difficult or even impossible because he would be able to consult with God through prayer. The final end of God for A christian would not be suicide and I believe that if a Christian has more time to contemplate, he would not end up in suicide.


SUSsylar111
post Jun 23 2014, 11:33 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,547 posts

Joined: Jun 2008
From: KL


QUOTE(unknown warrior @ Jun 23 2014, 11:01 AM)
Suicide doesn't happen by momentary lapse of weakness. What I mean is, it doesn't happen just like that.

It starts way, waaay before that.

It's accumulated through a period of pain, disappointment, depression, lack of understanding, hurt, etc.

Could be years, months before that.

Most likely, suicide tendency happen when the person gave up hope, God, everything.

From there, it starts.
*
Actually suicide can happen almost instantly.

Very simple example is an Economic crisis. You see people commit suicide almost immediately. You cannot really argue from this stance that they were depressed before that. It's the confusion that happens when they lose almost all their wealth and goes into bankruptcy.

I believe that under this kind of confusion, it is possible that a Christian can actually commit suicide because they are at such a confused as well as panic state, they really have no time to seek for God's guidance.

On the other hand, I think it is almost impossible for a Christian to actually commit suicide under the context you are talking about because they have a lot of time to contemplate on what to do next and if they are real believers, God will definitely be able to give them direction. It is actually during those time that faith becomes stronger for real christian because they realize that they cannot depend on themselves but they have to surrender totally to God.
SUSsylar111
post Jun 23 2014, 11:47 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,547 posts

Joined: Jun 2008
From: KL


QUOTE(pehkay @ Jun 23 2014, 11:24 AM)
Erm ... are you responding to Sophierre or me? Oh well, ignore this if you are responding to her.  laugh.gif I always that this problem with quotes.

My understanding is a little different  sweat.gif as I do not believe in "going to heaven", and thus a myth tongue.gif. I believe we have a higher destiny than that based on the revelation in the Bible.

The response to her was premised on some earlier sharing I had with her. That, even though our salvation is secure, the reward of the kingdom is not (1 Cor. 3:15). If a believer is not matured in the divine life in this age, he will have to go through dispensation punishment in the millennial kingdom where the overcoming believers will enjoy the rewards as co-kings. The defeated believers will be "trained"/"discipled" so that they are will be matured after 1000 years.

But then, this is just a supporting line.  cool.gif
*
I know that your denomination belong to watchman nee or something which I really do not conider part of conventional Christianity or true christianity as a matter of fact.

The bible did mentioned heaven many time and also of the promises that believers will get to heaven at the end. If you do not believe in "going to heaven", then why are you calling yourself christian? Are you mocking God's promises?

I think if God is willing to forgive us, there will be no more sins in his eyes.

The bible never mentioned about what you just said. The bible never mentioned about any training for 1000 years. It only mentions that Jesus will be ruling over here for 1000 years with the saints. As to what really happen(All saints revived?) This one is a theological one and will need to be discussed in other context. But what I am pretty sure is no "training" will be done over that 1000 year time period you are talking about to "unmaturing believers"

Well, reward and punishments are 2 different issue.

Anyway, thanks. But I am not interested in reading fairy tales.

Actually Unknown Warrior. No one ever took him to task before?

This post has been edited by sylar111: Jun 23 2014, 11:53 AM
SUSsylar111
post Jun 23 2014, 12:14 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,547 posts

Joined: Jun 2008
From: KL


QUOTE(jozs88 @ Jun 23 2014, 10:19 AM)
Hi guys,

Since we're on the topic of science vs religion (psychiatry VS Bible teachings).

I've always wondered and questioned those that say that the verses of the Bible is absolute even though present day science has proven them wrong.

A very good example would be back in the olden days when some scientifically minded dude said the world was round and the earth rotated around the sun and not vice versa. He was shunned and threatened by religious authorities and everyone around him because they were taught that whatever the church says "It is right". Saying the earth was round was blasphemous and a sin and a one way ticket to hell.

But fast forward many years later, when the world has indeed been confirmed to be round and rotates around the sun, the religous guys just went quiet. Thanks to non-religious guys, we know we have 24 hours in a day, 365 days and leap years, birthdays, better navigation accross the earth, etc etc. and from there, today we have Google Maps and Facebook tongue.gif

Don't you think that we ought to have a balance between science and religion? Can't we balance psychiatric treatments with God's teachings?

What do y'all think?
*
Actually I would argue that if religion(Christianity) was not revived during the reformation era, the science that we know of today may not even exist.

Sorry, we really cannot balance psychiatric treatments with God's teaching because they are mutually exclusive.

Secondly, the assumption that you are making is that psyhiatric treatment will make the patient better. There are many evidence that this is otherwise actually. If you consider making the patient better as being in a non violent state, then so be it. There has been studies that links psychiatric treatment with mass shootings actually.

I do not see the reason why science should be a greater truth compared to religion. Psychiatry is not really science actually because the effects cannot be reproduce. It is known that a diagnosis for the same patients can differ with different psychiatrist.

God's teaching is totally against psychiatry. So I do not see how they can exist together.
SUSsylar111
post Jun 23 2014, 12:41 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,547 posts

Joined: Jun 2008
From: KL


QUOTE(pehkay @ Jun 23 2014, 12:35 PM)
sweat.gif Whether I am of conventional Christianity or true christianity, or of a denomination or not etc, you can always make that statement. But please do substantiate your claims please in the spirit of fellowship. Just because my views on "going to heaven" are not of "mainstream" Christianity, it invalidates me as a believers? Did I not believe in the Triune God? Christ? The Spirit?

"I think if God is willing to forgive us, there will be no more sins in his eyes." Err.. duh! biggrin.gif
Am I mocking God's promises? No. Rather I have uplifted it to the uttermost. I am just sharing that the deification of man [but not in the Godhead =- theosis(wiki it)] as the pinnacle of God's salvation as the goal. It is 100000000x better than going to heaven. I cannot even substantiate anything from the Bible on this matter of "going to heaven". Even the unbelievers are laughing at the "unrighteousness" of it.

Do you have anything to substantiate on your claims on going to heaven? Please do not bring up traditions.

biggrin.gif
*
What I have stated is from the bible which is the real authority. Not your fairy tales.

In fact, I hope I am not the only one who called you out. If the other "brothers and sisters" do not call you out, I think I am out of this thread.

Well, even demons also believe in Jesus Christ. So your point being?

Well, actually yes. Because the bible actually mentioned very specifically that a person who adds or subtracts from the scripture, let them be cursed.

If you feel that you want following the bible is too burdensome or if you want to change your views to cater to the outside world, you can always create another religion.

Sorry friend. I am not using traditions here. I am using the word of God. What are you using?

This post has been edited by sylar111: Jun 23 2014, 12:44 PM
SUSsylar111
post Jun 23 2014, 12:45 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,547 posts

Joined: Jun 2008
From: KL


QUOTE(pehkay @ Jun 23 2014, 12:43 PM)
Wow ... just wow   rolleyes.gif
*
Yeah to you too. You want me to show you that verse that states that? Or you do not really follow the bible?

This post has been edited by sylar111: Jun 23 2014, 12:46 PM
SUSsylar111
post Jun 23 2014, 04:30 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,547 posts

Joined: Jun 2008
From: KL


QUOTE(unknown warrior @ Jun 23 2014, 04:17 PM)
I don't believe suicide happens just like that. Nobody responses like that.

It's not easy to end one's life even though at a very critical stage.

From my observation, there's usually a history prior to this, before arriving at that stage.

Same thing with why people divorce, why people go berserk.

It's usually accumulative day to day experiences of negative connotation that reached an explosion point.

And For sure, spiritually speaking it's either the work or influences of the devil
*
Why not.

I have even given an obvious example to this.

Are you sure that for most of the people who commited suicide because of financial crisis, they do so because they are in a state of depression.
Or you are just rejecting my example for the sake of argument.

If your case is true, then why is there so many suicide cases whenever there is a financial crisis. How sure that prior to each of the suicide during this period, there is a history that cause each person to commit suicide.

Of course it is never easy to take one's life. But during a financial crisis, the people who are badly hit are at a very critical stage because they have just lost everything in just a moment's time.

Also, any 'history' can be overcomed if a person is in Christ.

Honest Question: Have you ever faced any highly pressured situation whereby you have to provide results even though the odds are against you? If you have not, you will never be able to understand what is it like to be under a real boiler situation.

Ultimately, the blame for any sins lies in the person who commits it.

This post has been edited by sylar111: Jun 23 2014, 04:31 PM
SUSsylar111
post Jun 23 2014, 04:57 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,547 posts

Joined: Jun 2008
From: KL


QUOTE(unknown warrior @ Jun 23 2014, 04:45 PM)
Let me give you an example, prior to that state of depression, the guy may have accepted the condemnation that he's not doing good enough or is good enough for anything.
Even when He does good enough, there could be voice telling him, it's never enough, he got to do better. Just an example.

or

It could be that the said person is already in a financial delima, very critical one, takes an unrealistic gamble to invest the last portion he has and found He lost the gamble
What I mean is, people don't decide to suicide in the next few seconds. There's usually a precedent before it happens.
*
I know about the first example. I think most of us know about the first example.

And no. During a financial crisis, many of the people who are affected lost everything in a blink of an eye. It's not a gradual thing. Properties or stocks could go down by more then 50+% at 1 time even for safer companies. People go bankrupt overnight NOT because of poor financial decisions but because they did not get rid of their stocks in time. You do not understand how a financial crisis works do you?

As I said why not. Have you ever been in a high pressured boiler situation. Do you even realize the complications of what a person has to go through when he faces bankruptcy. A person can lose his sanity after just one incident. He can become depressed forever after just one incident. You are not aware of that? Just one incident can decapitate a person for life. Even if he did not commit suicide, he may not be able to function normally after that.

This post has been edited by sylar111: Jun 23 2014, 04:58 PM
SUSsylar111
post Jun 23 2014, 05:09 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,547 posts

Joined: Jun 2008
From: KL


QUOTE(unknown warrior @ Jun 23 2014, 05:01 PM)
It's how the person arrive to insanity, that's the precedent I'm talking about.

No I'm not talking about physical or material precedents (as in assets or financial stocks, etc) but soul aspect of the person.
*
Well, as I said, a person does not have to be suicidal or even have symptoms of insanity. He may be weak that's all. If that person did not face financial ruin or something, he would not be driven to insanity or suicide. My point is that there does not need to be any prior precedent building up which you are claiming in order for a person to commit suicide or be driven to insanity. A Single drastic incident can do that. Ok, I made my point.
SUSsylar111
post Jun 23 2014, 05:45 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,547 posts

Joined: Jun 2008
From: KL


QUOTE(unknown warrior @ Jun 23 2014, 05:28 PM)
Ahh, okay, maybe this point.

How is it, that the person becomes weak, how he arrive at being weak?

Is it through years of self condemnation, for example? Maybe, maybe not, depending on circumstances, his upbringing, many variables.

But How a person reacts today depends on what is being fed to his mind prior to today.

That is my point of what is the precedent.

Well, yes, a Single drastic incident can change people in an instance, for example road rage. But I always question, what is the person's philosophy in life that lead to the rage.

Could it be that He view himself untouchable with a high sense of pride? That kind of upbringing could lead to what happened.  This is another example of precedent.

And you did asked me whether I've encountered any critical boiling point in my life, the answer is yes. I know I've snapped before and it's because of anger. That's the thing I'm trying to explain.
How we live our lives (what we feed on in thoughts, emotions, etc) determines our next course of action even if it's a snap moment.
*
Well, a person can be weak just because he never experience failure in his life. So, this very experience would cause him to be weak. But then you really cannot argue that there was any procedents leading to him just snapping.

People have a different threshold for pressure. Some people can take it, some people cannot. Just the same as some people feel more pain then others.

Look at Moses. He is a man of God. Look at what he did under pressure. He whack his rod twice even though God told him not to. When someone is under pressure, he can do funny things. And I am pretty sure Moses is not a good example of a person who has bad thoughts and emotions. He just could not control himself during the spur of the moment that's all.

Now I would argue that if a person knows God, he would perheps be able to handle such critical shocks better, but then as shown in my example of Moses, even he succumbed to pressure.

This post has been edited by sylar111: Jun 23 2014, 05:50 PM
SUSsylar111
post Jun 24 2014, 11:20 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,547 posts

Joined: Jun 2008
From: KL


QUOTE(pehkay @ Jun 24 2014, 09:22 AM)
Wah, you all really only come out during near midnight ah? Oh good, you are familiar with some of the verses. And you are correct in that it is not a matter of eternal salvation. We can start with your second verse (1 Cor 3:12).
Although those believers whose Christian works are not approved by the Lord at His coming back will be saved, they will be saved so as through fire. Through fire surely indicates punishment.

"If anyone's work which he has built upon the foundation remains, he will receive a reward" (1 Cor. 3:14). If he doesn't built with the Triune God (gold/silver/precious stones), then no reward? What will this meant then if all receive reward?  sweat.gif
If this is true, we will problems [lots of] with including the verses you mentioned:

1) But the children of the kingdom shall be cast out into outer darkness: there shall be weeping and gnashing of teeth. - Matt 8:12

2) In Revelation, the word was spoken to the church, not to unbelievers, that there will be overcomers, a remnant (Rev 2-3).

3) Matt 18:23 "settle accounts with his slaves". Slaves definitely are not unbelievers. Verse 34, "And his master became angry and delivered him to the torturers until he would repay all that was owed." How can we explain this? This is the Lord's dealing with His believers at His coming back. If we do not forgive the brother who sins against us, we will be disciplined by the Lord until we forgive him from the heart, i.e., until we repay all that is owed. Then the Lord will forgive us. This is forgiveness in the kingdom. This implies that if we do not forgive a brother from our heart today, we will not be allowed to enter into the kingdom in the coming age.

4) 2 Cor 5:10 "For we must all be manifested before the judgement seat of Christ, that each one may receive the things done through the body according to what he has practiced, whether good or bad."

5) Also, Paul's metaphor of running the race to gain the prize. It won't make sense if he thinks that he has the reward already. Before writing Timothy, he did mentioned that he hasn't got the reward, always forgetting behind and looking forward. How can we reconciled this?

5a) There are five aspects of the crowns. The crown, a symbol of glory, is given as a prize, in addition to the Lord's salvation, to the triumphant runner of the race (1 Cor. 9:25). In contrast to salvation, which is of grace and by faith (Eph. 2:5, 8-9), this prize is not of grace nor by faith, but is of righteousness through works (Matt. 16:27; Rev. 22:12; 2 Cor. 5:10). The believers will be recompensed with such a reward, not according to the Lord's grace but according to His righteousness.

The New Testament speaks of the believers being rewarded with five different kinds of crowns in the future.

In 2 Tim. 4:8 we have the crown of righteousness (2 Tim. 4:8). "The crown of life" (Rev. 2:10). "The unfading crown of glory” (1 Pet. 5:4). "They may receive a corruptible crown, but we, an incorruptible" (1 Cor. 9:25). "Joy or crown" (1 Thes. 2:19; Phil. 4:1).

And lot more verses from Hebrews, Matthew that is frequently used by our dear Arminianism brothers will be problematic if we adhere to this interpretation.

For 1 Corinthians 2:9, the context is we are enjoying this reality now in our Christian life to those who love Him. We don't have to wait till then tongue.gif. Though I can't imagine applying to the future that since the context is present.

The Bible is silent on what kind of disciplines as I don't think there is a ranking [fallen concept tongue.gif - no such things]. But, based on the parable of the ten virgins (maturity in the divine life (oil in the vessel)) and slaves [faithfulness in service]. If we are not perfected in this short age, this 1000 years, the Lord will make sure all defeated believers matured in His life and to be faithful in service. This is just one aspect. We just don't analyse it too much when there is not much. But we can be sure, there will be a judgement on the believers.
You are right that it is different from the great white throne judgement.

Shortly before the beginning of the great tribulation (which coincides with the second half of the last week in Daniel), the rapture of the overcoming believers to the heavens, including the rapture of the dead overcomers—the man-child (Rev. 12:1-11)—and the rapture of the living overcomers— the firstfruits (14:1-5), will take place. The remainder of the believers (the majority) will be raptured at the very end of the great tribulation. The rapture of the overcoming believers, especially of the man-child, will precipitate war in heaven, and the devil will be cast down to earth to form an evil trinity with Antichrist and the false prophet. After all the believers have been raptured, they will appear before the judgment seat of Christ to be judged not concerning eternal salvation (a matter which is settled once for all and which is eternally secure from the time we believe and are regenerated) but concerning reward or punishment during the age of the kingdom. Those who are approved by the Lord Jesus and receive a reward will enter into the Lord's joy and reign  with Him in the millennial kingdom; those who are disapproved will not simply lose the reward but will also experience some kind of dispensational punishment in "the outer darkness" (Matt. 8:12; 22:13; 25:30).

The problem is not with sin but with the maturity of life. We can have a resurrected body but within like Paul mentioned, we are still not renewed, sanctified, transformed, conformed or glorified in our soul. We are still infants. The divine life that we have never experienced in our daily salvation (Phil.) will not magically appear tongue.gif This is why, the foolish virgins do not have EXTRA oil (The Spirit) in their vessel (soul). They have only oil in their lamp (spirit - Proverbs) = they are genuinely saved. The Lord is not marrying a child Bride  wub.gif

P.S. Unless you genuinely really want to know, the matter of the kingdom reward solves both problems inherent in Calvinism and Arminianism. Do bring it up if you like to know more so that I won't waste anyone's time if you are not interested.

This matter of the judgment of the believers and of their being hurt by the fire is neither Calvinism nor Arminianism. According to Calvinism, once we are saved, we are saved forever, and there can be no further problem. In a sense, Calvinism is correct, for once we are saved, we are saved for eternity. However, we should not say that there can be no problems. There is the possibility of being burned in the fire. According to Arminianism, some may be saved in the morning and lose their salvation that night. Their salvation goes up and down like an elevator. Neither Calvinism nor Arminianism is according to the pure word of the Bible. The Bible reveals that we are saved for eternity, but that after we are saved, we need to overcome every sinful thing. If not, we shall be disciplined, punished. If you do not repent and confess your sin, but stay in adultery, in the next age you will be put into the fire and burned, not for eternal perdition, but as a dispensational punishment.

This is righteous! Otherwise, I can go and enjoy the world knowing that I have already obtained the reward. It really doesn't make sense tongue.gif ... and I can't convince anyone of that or myself  wink.gif
*
I will just make comment on your last statement la.

A true Christian does not sin because he realize that there is no profit in doing that and also out of love for God and also because he desire the truth. He will not continue in his sinning ways just because he is forgiven.

As for the rest. I really do not want to waste my time.

Ok just 1. The virgins who did not enter were not saved because the bridegroom told them that he did not know them. If they were saved, the bridegroom will not make that remark. You seriously have a writing fairy tales do you.

Calvanism or Arminianism only explains 1 aspect of the Gospel. It does not explain everything. Of course they are not pure word of the bible because they are just human interpretations.
And you do not even understand calvanism. Even though calvanism preaches OSAS. But every calvanist knows that just because a person appears to be a Christian, it does not mean that he is saved and also a true Christian examines himself.

SUSsylar111
post Jun 24 2014, 12:01 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,547 posts

Joined: Jun 2008
From: KL


QUOTE(unknown warrior @ Jun 23 2014, 09:08 PM)
This is getting a bit off topic, from suicide to snap anger. We can always call this off to agree to disagree.

I think what causes suicide has more to do with giving up on hope and what causes anger is a snap of stress aggravation.

Moses had many weakness like most of us, among them, lack of confidence, insecure, can't speak well, fearful, etc.

But that's not the point. Getting to know God under the Old Testament Law requires a tall order. It requires perfection and No one is able to fulfil it perfectly because it hinges on own's strength, thus in the word of Apostle, we do the evil we want not and do not the good we want.

The Failures of Moses, along with others like Abraham, even Judas has theological reasons, too wide a topic to discuss at one go.
*
Actually, following God under the Old Testament is based on faith and not really on one's own strength.

Hebrews 11.

As for Romans 7, it does not states that following the law is a tall order, but the reason it's the sinful nature that prevents the apostle from following it.

10 Pages  1 2 3 > » Top
Topic ClosedOptions
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0769sec    0.42    7 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 28th November 2025 - 08:51 AM