QUOTE(Lord Gitsy @ Dec 14 2017, 11:50 PM)
Hi, 3M Crystalline's material is not same with Raytech Ultra 70 and also other brands products and developed from different manufacturer's technology so detection of Smartag cannot be same. I believe it is a great benefit for customer if we can sell a high performance product with lesser Smartag problem right ?
I 100% agree on the material and technology being different.
However, as you mentioned heat rejection is based on three things, VLT+IRR+UV= TSER
If VLT is constant and UV is already at 99% (so another constant), the only differing one would be the IRR.
Your explanation that Raytech can have higher TSER than 3m or LLumar or Suntek, is that Raytech can block more IRR.
Eg: IRR for 3M is 97% but it is only a small bandwidth, 900-1000nm (i think), and you said that Raytech's TSER is higher as its IRR is higher across a wider range of Infrared (750nm to 2500nm).
Hence, i praised your explanation on Raytech's ability to block more heat (higher TSER) than other brands.
Now, after some thinking, if Raytech blocks more IR spectrum and SMART TAG uses IR spectrum, wouldn't that make Raytech tint unusable with SMART TAG?
While I understand that technology can be different but unless heat nature from the Sun is changed, a good TSER tint will indirectly stop SMART TAG from working.
Do correct me if i am wrong
Thanks