What is the best high heat rejection tint available now ?

3M or Llumar or Vkool or Huper Optik ?

Please specify the model you recommend. COnfused with so many models

Those clear windows film (between 50-70%) are expensive because it can reject up to 90% heat despite being so clear to make it LEGAL.
Otherwise you can have 2nd option - ILLEGAL to get better price and heat

I'm sorry, should put it as 90% Infra Red Heat Rejection (about 50-60% TSER)
I assume you consider the original glass about 20% VLT but in the market there is not 90% VLT film

3M fx-hp 50
3M FX-ST 50
3M Fx-St 70

Llumar Phantom 50
Which one is the most effective in heat rejection?
Anybody has the price for each film?

Planning to install on car windscreen

Stock car front screen already is not 100% VLT.
So practically any "good" tinting will cause my car break jpj rule, no?

Going to tint my new ride  kia sorento soon

Any recommendations between raytech, vkool and huper optic??

Budget is open, but want to seek for good deal

means?

Hi sorry, Do you know your conclusion might misleading the newbies in window film market? I hope you can respect the culture and the sellers here. We prefer more to help or answer and not jeopardize people brand in this discussion. 

Commonwealth Laminating & Coating which is Raytech's OEM manufacturer produces tint for RAYTECH with CUSTOM SPECIFICATION. Since it's our USA manufacturer, we must customize the tint specification and make sure it's compliance to our local government regulation and suitable for Malaysia weather.

Raytech products have been tested to ensure Good Quality and are certified by TUV standards which can apply on the new policy MS2669:2017 next year. The test report was done by QAV Technologies Sdn Bhd (04-6438317). If you have studied about MS2669:2017 policy, this policy is to ensure customer can get good quality products with good heat rejection and can be last at least 5 years without bubbling, and also protect customer for not being cheating by low grade film or fake irr reading.

The test requirement are as below picture. With these testing, are Raytech products Good quality ?

I'm curious too ....

Someone quoted their UV400 heat rejection is 94% and TSER is 79% ....

RM1800 for a sedan.

60 is better than 70 right?

Hi. I think u are only read his comment and we have replied to that statement. And also the following comment we replied until now which explained the main things that affect the performance of window film. Different VLT % (Visible Light Transmittance)  and different of IRR % (Infrared red rejection)  can affect significantly in performance. You can read thoroughly 

The video is a guideline for consumer to chose Genuine brand products. It's not even for our products only and workable in other Genuine brands too. You can have your own way to judge the product, just make sure you request the meter testing before purchase. Raytech provides meter testing in the shop too.

Raytech Ultra 70 - VLT 73%, TSER 58%
Huper Ceramic 60 - VLT 60%, TSER 42%
3m crystalline 70 - VLT 68%, TSER 50%
vkool elite - VLT 73% , TSER ?? (cant found tser)
haverkamp 70 , VLT 70%, TSER 50%

just wondering how you get this TSER 58% ? Do you mind to explain the way you get TSER 58% ?

raytech 70 is 15% more compare with others film in market.  All Tint Film model above IRR should all is 90% above. With same IRR & VLT , how come Raytech 70 have big different compare to others ?

thought those IRR 98% above get smartag problem, example 3M tint.

if it 90% IRR, should work as normal

Hi, thanks for providing the info. The specification of Raytech products are provided by the laboratory of our manufacturer. Different manufacturer will have different ways to measure Infrared-red rejection (IRR). They are measured our products with wider band of wavelength for IRR. So overall TSER is better.

In technically, Infrared-red rejection (IRR) has a wavelength from 780nm-2500nm, which is meaning the entire IRR “band” is 1,720 nm wide. Different of window film manufacturers report performance for IRR in a variety of ways because there is not one, uniformly accepted test method for measuring IRR. Each manufacturer measures IRR differently, generally at a single point or narrow range at which the film may perform great and thus, best marketed in that range. For example, 3M products is measured under wavelength band 900-1000nm ONLY. It has 97% IRR in that band only but does not mean it has same results in overall wavelength.



Some specific examples of these claims include:

Product A: A product manufacturer reports the Infrared-red rejection (IRR) at only one wavelength, 1000nm, where the energy from the sun has already significantly tapered off.
Product B: A manufacturer of a product chose to report the IRR at 1025 nm, which carries about 10% less solar energy than reporting it at 1000 nm.
Product C: The manufacturer chose a point to the far right of the spectrum, out in the near infrared at approximately 1450 nm, where there is almost no solar energy left.
Product D and E: Manufacturers not reporting a specific wave length or range of wavelengths over which they make their IRR claims.
Product F: The manufacturer of this product only reports their IRR number between 900nm and 1,000nm, for a total bandwidth of 100 nm. Noting that the entire IRR band is 1,720 nm wide, this figure represents about 6% of the entire width of the IRR. Therefore, the IRR reported by this company ignores 94% of the infrared wavelengths.

Lastly, Raytech emphasize consumers to test window film by BTU solar power meter instead of IRR meter because BTU meter can show how much of the total solar heat can be rejected by a window film

You are welcome to visit our branch to see product demo personally. We can test products by BTU solar meter and do comparison for few brands with meter for u to understand

V-Kool Elite = V-Kool 70 = TSER 55%

http://www.v-kool.com/automotive-window-films/V-KOOL70

It's Smart Tag friendly expect those access card/auto gate with poor infra red reception

Hi, 3M Crystalline's material is not same with Raytech Ultra 70 and also other brands products and developed from different manufacturer's technology so detection of Smartag cannot be same. I believe it is a great benefit for customer if we can sell a high performance product with lesser Smartag problem right ?

Smartag use Infra red, but there is a specific bandwidth of IR. As long as the the tint film do not filtered out 100% of IR emited by Smartag, i think smartag will be detected at toll.
correct me if im wrong.

Bros, may i ask a question.
My car just tinted with brand 3M from Honda Authorized Dealer and i found the VLT are quite high... Am i able to add another tint to reduce VLT? or i need to re-do it all again