Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

16 Pages « < 2 3 4 5 6 > » Bottom

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 Third Class = No value?

views
     
goliath
post Jun 16 2006, 11:34 PM

* * * * * * *
*******
Senior Member
5,533 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Kuala Lumpur
QUOTE(Hornet @ Jun 16 2006, 09:33 PM)
Erm, if u guys dont mind, I'd like to ask one more thing.
Lets say if a certain class, lets say 3rd class, generally has a certain value (certainly not any higher than a 2nd class), are they the same or does it varies depending on what kind of degree? Like between an Engineering, IT or management degree...

reason why I'm asking is tht i read thru the discussion here, thanks to those who share some experience here, just to get an idea how it is like to have a 3rd class degree and one that's higher.... but I'm not sure exactly what kind of degree u guys are talking about, IT or engineering or management blush.gif . So i wonder if it applies similer regardless of what kind of degree... heh... thx
*
If I read your statement correctly (pardon me if I'm wrong), the ratings (1st class, 2nd Higher, 2nd Lower, 3rd Class and Pass) are the same in every department (IT, Engineering, Law, Business etc). I'm not sure about Australia's education or any other part of the world's education on this matter. Correct me if I'm wrong unsure.gif
Pennywise
post Jun 17 2006, 01:25 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
5,796 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
Went out few hours, this post become so long already. Lazy to read.

As for my friend who I posted here, well, he knows his stuff and he is confident. Sometimes people only need an opportunity to prove themselves. If he met a pariah boss thats only there to exploit him, his nasib la.

But when he was desperate, he used his ace (though some of u think it's silly), but well it worked. Now he's team leader in Seremban and recently bought a new house in Shah Alam somemore... Not bad eh?
brokenomerta
post Jun 17 2006, 03:05 AM

Current Toy: MacBook Pro 13 2013
******
Senior Member
1,168 posts

Joined: Oct 2005
QUOTE(dreamer101 @ Jun 16 2006, 06:40 PM)
1)  He has a diploma plus two years working experience.  He know how to do his job.  Compare him to a fresh grads without working experience and no confidence, who do you think is a better worker??

2) Do you pay for your own degree?? Aka your family did not and could not help you financially?? Did you ever starve because you have no money to buy food??  If not, please do not say things like "to say one cannot study cos financial problems and distractions, for me that are excuses."

Dreamer
*
in a world with so much graduates with degrees now, what is a simple diploma, my fren...2 exp with 3rd class diploma against a 1st class honours degree student with a cgpa of 3.75 with no exp? sorry dude...i will have to choose the latter one...with a good head and willingness to learn, im sure the 1st class honours student will try to learn as much as possible...and ur statement to say that all fresh grads do not have confidence, pls do not generalize lar...

why not give fresh grads a chance (esp those with damn good grades)...if no1 give chance to them, then how to get exp la...remember the old saying, catch 22, u cant job without exp BUT u cant get exp without job...remember that my fren...

as for the second part, my fren, yes...i did all my studies in a local public university in msia...all rite after stpm...all under ptptn...i have a part time job...to pay for my expenses inclu cellphone bills, books etc...a full 3 years IT course in public uni will cost around rm900 per semester, my fren...and i am going to pay off my ptptpn soon...

so, dude...not everyone in this world is a 2 Small Joe...there is still ppl who earn it the hard way...
brokenomerta
post Jun 17 2006, 03:17 AM

Current Toy: MacBook Pro 13 2013
******
Senior Member
1,168 posts

Joined: Oct 2005
QUOTE(Vv.SoViEt.vV @ Jun 16 2006, 09:38 PM)
Well you see Captain Obvious, everyone has different aim in life. Things that are too good for you probably a piece of shlt to me. Get it?
*
best i heard all day...hahahaa...to those who think that just having a degree is enuf, pls think again...there are like tons of ppl with degrees out there now...not one having to find a decent job...

and pls do not get me started with ppl who are satisfied with a diploma only...

i will speak in a very straight foward way...u reap what u sow...easy...every 1st class success is associated with intense studying and revision...does anyone here thinks that just anyone can get a 1st class without studying? yes, if ur name is stephen hawking!

and to say that each class deserved the same opportunity is simply nuts...if treated so, then why does ppl need to strive for 1st class for???the 1st class ppl is the one that separated the best from the rest...

yes, its a dog-eat-dog world out there...too bad if u dont want to live in there ...and to one of the forumer's question: what cgpa is high? easy...1st class honours, 3.75 and above...

and u know what is funny? it is always those who did badly such as 3rd class honours who complain and grumble about life at the bottom...did i hear any 1st class honours graduates complaining? of course not...

that my frens, is you reap what you sow...remember that...
dreamer101
post Jun 17 2006, 04:07 AM

10k Club
Group Icon
Elite
15,855 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
QUOTE(brokenomerta @ Jun 17 2006, 03:05 AM)
in a world with so much graduates with degrees now, what is a simple diploma, my fren...2 exp with 3rd class diploma against a 1st class honours degree student with a cgpa of 3.75 with no exp? sorry dude...i will have to choose the latter one...with a good head and willingness to learn, im sure the 1st class honours student will try to learn as much as possible...and ur statement to say that all fresh grads do not have confidence, pls do not generalize lar...

why not give fresh grads a chance (esp those with damn good grades)...if no1 give chance to them, then how to get exp la...remember the old saying, catch 22, u cant job without exp BUT u cant get exp without job...remember that my fren...

as for the second part, my fren, yes...i did all my studies in a local public university in msia...all rite after stpm...all under ptptn...i have a part time job...to pay for my expenses inclu cellphone bills, books etc...a full 3 years IT course in public uni will cost around rm900 per semester, my fren...and i am going to pay off my ptptpn soon...

so, dude...not everyone in this world is a 2 Small Joe...there is still ppl who earn it the hard way...
*
As a manager, you hire people that can do their job. In this case, the person has 2 years experience of doing the kind of job that you want. He is proven. Why do I want to take chances on someone else which might be book smart but totally unsuitable for IT line of work??

So, between people that have potential versus people that have actual experience. You always go for people that have experience.

Catch 22 only existed for people that is not resourceful enough. For IT related type of works, a person can gain substantial experience by doing stuff beyond the normal coursework if the person is motivated enough.

Dreamer

P.S.: If you actually have first class honour from our local public university, our English standard in Malaysia must have gone a lot worse than I believe.


This post has been edited by dreamer101: Jun 17 2006, 04:24 AM
Pennywise
post Jun 17 2006, 04:49 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
5,796 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
QUOTE(jinyee80 @ Jun 16 2006, 06:19 PM)
Once, I was attending the third group assessment to get a job in a MNC, my final result released. My final result was dissapointed, CGPA 2.99, a little bit close to 3.0.

It was a 4 stages job interview. I passed the earlier two, doing well in the case study and group discussion as well. Since my final result has not been released, and I was using my previous exam result to apply for a job, they called me up for an interview, the first interview. My CGPA was 2.8 that time. They told me that the job will require at least 3.0, and she asked me whether my final will get it or not. I said maybe I could or maybe I could not. She asked me to do some personality test and I got through. I was then called for second interview and move on to the third.

That was a cold morning. I woke up at 6am as the 3rd interview started on 8.30am sharp. I went there with my 'just-released' result, which is 2.99 one. The HR personnel asked me to submit my resume, photostated result and original again. Then, waiting for a while, I was called into a room, which there were 3 interviewers. They looked at my result and said how would I be sitting in front of them since my result did not even touch 3.0. I was like feeling depressed as they kept on mentioning that I will not be their cup of tea and wasting their time. I told them I will perform because results did not show everything. I was slightly near to 3.0 and I believe I have the quality that they required.

Well, during the group assessment, AGAIN, I was mentioned, I mean I was insulted again as the speaker mentioned I have the lowest CGPA around those 20 candidates.

I did not get the job. The HR people called me up and told me no matter how good you are, no matter how well you perform during the interview or how well you would be willing to show yourself out, they just don't want you to have a CGPA lower than 3.0. This is the pride of the company, they did not want others saying that they hire a nearly 3.0 person. They want people to know they absorb those high CGPA person and coach them well.

Well, I did not believe that high CGPA means high performance. But I do believe that we should treat every class as the same.
*
I would have told them off in the face. Dont waste my time too. It's not a matter of you want their job, you have to respect them but its mutual. Afterall, they dont own the damn thing, they work there too.

Just because your results dont look so bright does not give them the right to step all over you. Best thing you can do is protect yourself and give it to them straight, honest, direct but not harsh.
TSkatsurou
post Jun 17 2006, 04:57 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
53 posts

Joined: Oct 2004


QUOTE(dreamer101 @ Jun 16 2006, 08:10 PM)
Katsurou,

If I am interviewing you, you will be rejected based on your response to those 5 questions.

1) It is either a 2 years or 4 years courses.  And, your result is so bad that it ONLY takes only failure of one subject to put you down below 3.0.  Rome is not built on one day.  Your  bad GPA takes more one bad exam to happen.

2) You are a full-time student.  You only only one thing to do and you did a bad job.

3) So, the bottomline is you have full time to study and still get a bad result.

4) B.S. Sour grapes!! In working as in studying, there are times when things are boring but you still have to do a good job.  This is called commitment. That is the difference between a good work ethic and a bad one.

Do you want to hire someone that only work hard when it is not boring??  I will not.  And, so far, we are not talking about good result here. 3.0 is only fair and average and you cannot even get that.

5) I can say that you are NOT hardworking in studying.  Either that or you are not very smart. 

And, that is not the worse part of all.  I will reject you because you have NO WORK ETHIC.

A) You do not  realize that you are FULLY responsible for your GPA.

B) You do not have the stamina to do the boring stuff even if it is required for your job.

Dreamer
*
FYI, my university only takes 7 final subjects to classify the degree. Failing one double module subject already can pull down my classification greatly.

As I understood from your statement, you mean people with good results are wiling to work with boring stuff. I have one question here. Why they're so many students who can't speak fluent english? Isn't it because they think english is boring or too difficult to learn? May be you can answer that for me.

As I told you in the previous post. Working is different from studying. What you learn from working is useful for your job but not necessary from your studies. Even if parts of the working process are boring but still I'm more motivated to learn them because I know I will need to use them. However, when it comes to studying, you're only memorizing things that you might not be even using or applying them in the future.

How can you tell a person has good work ethic where he has no working experience before? People who has received a first class but never work before can you confirm to say that he/she has a very good working ethic? Compared to me who has been worked in a MNC before during my semester break and was awarded a testimonial saying that I'm a good-natured and hardworking employee.

Once again you think that studying reflects working attidude but why those earning the most money are not the ones who study the hardest in schools or colleges?
draggy
post Jun 17 2006, 06:30 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
200 posts

Joined: Mar 2005


don't be sad thread starter......
.
I had a friend who has lost his honours meaning that he's wrost then 3rd class but he still able to get a good job and well paid......

Degree is nothing but a paper that only proof how well..... you perform in your years at the university or college...... but it haven't proof the truth ability of yourself yet......

All those fate and karma still lay in your own hand, which can be alter by yourself alone.........
Vv.SoViEt.vV
post Jun 17 2006, 07:51 AM

ToRMeNted-sOUL
******
Senior Member
1,359 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
QUOTE(dreamer101 @ Jun 17 2006, 04:07 AM)
P.S.: If you actually have first class honour from our local public university, our English standard in Malaysia must have gone a lot worse than I believe.
As far as I know, Asia Pacific Institute Information Technology (UCTI) is accredited by Staffordshire University following UK standards. When our results subjected to external moderation (moderators from UK), our results always get downgraded!! O_O; Sigh
dreamer101
post Jun 17 2006, 08:33 AM

10k Club
Group Icon
Elite
15,855 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
QUOTE(katsurou @ Jun 17 2006, 04:57 AM)
FYI, my university only takes 7 final subjects to classify the degree. Failing one double module subject already can pull down my classification greatly.

As I understood from your statement, you mean people with good results are wiling to work with boring stuff. I have one question here. Why they're so many students who can't speak fluent english? Isn't it because they think english is boring or too difficult to learn? May be you can answer that for me.

As I told you in the previous post. Working is different from studying. What you learn from working is useful for your job but not necessary from your studies. Even if parts of the working process are boring but still I'm more motivated to learn them because I know I will need to use them. However, when it comes to studying, you're only memorizing things that you might not be even using or applying them in the future.

How can you tell a person has good work ethic where he has no working experience before? People who has received a first class but never work before can you confirm to say that he/she has a very good working ethic? Compared to me who has been worked in a MNC before during my semester break and was awarded a testimonial saying that I'm a good-natured and hardworking employee.

Once again you think that studying reflects working attidude but why those earning the most money are not the ones who study the hardest in schools or colleges?
*
1) "Student cannot speak fluent English"

We have university with low standard. Those people should not be allow to be graduated to begin with.


2) "Working is different from studying and etc..."

Do you know why I think you have BAD work ethic?? It is actually very simple. You are arguing with me as opposed to take responsibility and face the fact that you had messed up. That is a clear sign of the lack of maturity.

Being an adult means you takes responsibility of everything you had done: correctly or not. Whining is not acceptable.

3) "those earning the most money are not the one study the hardest"

Yes. You are correct. But, we are talking about the "hardest" here. You are not even at the level of studying hard here as you have admitted yourself.

You deserved your result. So, just leave it as it is.

Dreamer

Pennywise
post Jun 17 2006, 09:30 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
5,796 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
Different people, different views. We are here to learn from one another, not start a war.

If your results are poor, like a 3rd Class Degree, then you make it up with hardwork. No doubt, many fool around during their college days but there are really some of those unfortunate ones.

You reap what you sow is true. Just be prepared for things. Who knows you might get lucky. From what you read from Page 1 - 4, so many 3rd Class or General Degree holders still manage to secure a job.

Work is not all about educational achievements. It's more than that, dealing with people, social skills, hardwork, how you get along with others, and in my humble opinion - the most important two points are:
1. Problem solving skills
2. Ability to multi-task

Cannot study does not mean cannot work. Likewise, can study does not mean can work.

I know a girl who is the top student of her year throughout her life. Best of the best results, scholarships, etc. Praises from church, gives tuition, people worship her educational achievements. But bad point is she cant seem to get along with people at work no matter where she went.

There are many kinds of people, you are one type, he is another. There are many kinds of situation, he was in one that you may not ever be in. You may experience a situation in an interview where he may not understand even if he imagined it. Sometimes interview depends on luck too. Do not let poor results pull you down. Make it up to yourself by dedicating more time and effort into your work. Afterall, you will be walking this path call WORK for the next 30 or so years of your life, till you retire and wait for death to take you.

What more is there for you to look forward to if it's not work? People can sweep the floor to make a living. Since you have a 3rd Class, I guess you shouldnt be complaining about starting low. Chinese proverb "Start your way from the bottom and climb your way up."

It's never an easy task. Life was never a bed of roses. All you have to do is choose your allegiance carefully, make alliances and enemies, climb, fight, push, draw, whatever. Just try your best, no regrets is all you ever need.

This is the only advice I can give you all. I started out with it too. "It's time for you to pick up everything you've missed." All that you dont know, all that you wanted to do - the time is now.


Thank you for reading.
rexis
post Jun 17 2006, 09:43 AM

*** 7-star status Old Bird ***
*******
Senior Member
3,590 posts

Joined: Apr 2006
From: nowhere


QUOTE(Hornet @ Jun 16 2006, 09:33 PM)
Erm, if u guys dont mind, I'd like to ask one more thing.
Lets say if a certain class, lets say 3rd class, generally has a certain value (certainly not any higher than a 2nd class), are they the same or does it varies depending on what kind of degree? Like between an Engineering, IT or management degree...

reason why I'm asking is tht i read thru the discussion here, thanks to those who share some experience here, just to get an idea how it is like to have a 3rd class degree and one that's higher.... but I'm not sure exactly what kind of degree u guys are talking about, IT or engineering or management blush.gif . So i wonder if it applies similer regardless of what kind of degree... heh... thx
*
AFAIK, usually i see MNC and bank hiring IT and management degree will mention about "2nd class upper and above", let them get their bookworms, no matter. But engineering degree i rarely see them mentioning about what class they want, of course you score higher you get bigger change, but what i understand is engineering field more focus on what you know.

Correct me if im wrong! happy.gif

This post has been edited by rexis: Jun 17 2006, 09:44 AM
brokenomerta
post Jun 17 2006, 11:57 AM

Current Toy: MacBook Pro 13 2013
******
Senior Member
1,168 posts

Joined: Oct 2005
QUOTE(dreamer101 @ Jun 17 2006, 04:07 AM)
As a manager, you hire people that can do their job.  In this case, the person has 2 years experience of doing the kind of job that you want.  He is proven.  Why do I want to take chances on someone else which might be book smart but totally unsuitable for IT line of work??

So, between people that have potential versus people that have actual experience.  You always go for people that have experience.

Catch 22 only existed for people that is not resourceful enough.  For IT related type of works, a person can gain substantial experience by doing stuff beyond the normal coursework if the person is motivated enough.

Dreamer

P.S.: If you actually have first class honour from our local public university, our English standard in Malaysia must have gone a lot worse than I believe.
*
hahahaha...what is wrong with being book smart anyway? last i recall, from a reality show lately, a book smart won the competition, not the street smart...being smart is easier to be experienced rather than a person who has all street smarts but cant learn from past mistakes...

based on what u are saying, when do u actually will hire a fresh grad? Never? hahhahahaa...if everyone thinks like you, i dont think any fresh grad will get job...hahahahaha...

p/s: if my english is that bad, i assume u think that ur's is great? haahhahahaa...that, my dear friend, is falsely wrong...hahahaa...this is a moderated forum, my fren...dont go shakespearen on me to show ur street cred...

dont go around dismissing ppl's cred...u ask me a question in the previous posts and i answer it...if u have the guts, why not go ahead and tell me and everyone else here what YOU have...come on...back it up...

wanna make change, start with the person in the mirror...not everyone else...

This post has been edited by brokenomerta: Jun 17 2006, 12:06 PM
yihyan
post Jun 17 2006, 12:34 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
862 posts

Joined: May 2006
QUOTE(brokenomerta @ Jun 17 2006, 11:57 AM)
p/s: if my english is that bad, i assume u think that ur's is great? haahhahahaa...that, my dear friend, is falsely wrong...hahahaa...this is a moderated forum, my fren...dont go shakespearen on me to show ur street cred...

dont go around dismissing ppl's cred...u ask me a question in the previous posts and i answer it...if u have the guts, why not go ahead and tell me and everyone else here what YOU have...come on...back it up...

wanna make change, start with the person in the mirror...not everyone else...
*
cool down man rclxub.gif
Hornet
post Jun 17 2006, 01:51 PM

What?
*******
Senior Member
4,251 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Malacca, Malaysia, Earth


QUOTE(goliath @ Jun 16 2006, 11:34 PM)
If I read your statement correctly (pardon me if I'm wrong), the ratings (1st class, 2nd Higher, 2nd Lower, 3rd Class and Pass) are the same in every department (IT, Engineering, Law, Business etc). I'm not sure about Australia's education or any other part of the world's education on this matter. Correct me if I'm wrong unsure.gif
*
erm, my mistake i think i didnt state clearly...
I mean if comparing it in terms of value when we're finding job out there...

I mean, does a Engineering degree comparing to a IT degree for example, both of the same class, have the same value... thats what i'm asking.

if anyone can give some opinion, thanks tongue.gif
FleshWound
post Jun 17 2006, 01:54 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
76 posts

Joined: Apr 2006
nothing i hate worse than self glorifying ******* in the engineering faculty of my uni who thinks they're very much smarter than the people in IT faculty. here's what: GET LOST.
igor_is300
post Jun 17 2006, 02:26 PM

Cheesy & Corny
*******
Senior Member
2,728 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Muddy Confluence
QUOTE(Vv.SoViEt.vV @ Jun 16 2006, 09:38 PM)
Well you see Captain Obvious, everyone has different aim in life. Things that are too good for you probably a piece of shlt to me. Get it?
*
Am I sound too harsh? While posting in the serious sub-forums do I have to get this piece of bullcrap so in end of the day everyone knows you are an asscracka ?

My friend received a pass degree in BEng from Sheffield University, UK. He spent 3 years studying there. Oh yeah, he got 9A1 in SPM back in 1999. Did he received piece of shite compared to you ?

QUOTE(Vv.SoViEt.vV @ Jun 17 2006, 07:51 AM)
As far as I know, Asia Pacific Institute Information Technology (UCTI) is accredited by Staffordshire University following UK standards. When our results subjected to external moderation (moderators from UK), our results always get downgraded!! O_O; Sigh
*
FYI I graduated from Staffordshire University, UK. Yeah, I spent some years in Stafford town knowing all the people in the Stafford Guildhall too. Although this uni. is not listed under Top 15 university in the UK but it has same standard of degree awarding like other uni. We also have external examiners from other universities. I don't know about APIIT or UCTI though, but from your reply the local standards are quite low wink.gif

This post has been edited by igor_is300: Jun 17 2006, 02:39 PM
havenzhiv
post Jun 17 2006, 03:03 PM

On my way
****
Senior Member
556 posts

Joined: Jun 2005
From: Kelana Jaya


For your (or everyone else for that matter) information, i do agree that local universities do have a low standard, heck, i graduated from one of the local universites, but the standards from the university does not hold on to me. I've set my own standards and targets. Am i a low quality graduate?As far as i am concern, what i am working as now, i think i am not. Can i afford to study oversea?I can't but my parents can and they would if i wanted.

Bottom line is, doesnt matter where you study, uni creds, grades is just an assisting paper (ok, so it helps, quite alot) but what counts is your ability to convey the message that you are the one.

To the topic, i partially agree that that 3rd class = no value BUT depends on what course. IT, Engineering and like wise, not necessary but when it comes to detail subjects like geology, reseach work intense subjects/positions which require precise detailing and what not, it is very important what class you got.

cheers
igor_is300
post Jun 17 2006, 03:19 PM

Cheesy & Corny
*******
Senior Member
2,728 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Muddy Confluence
QUOTE(havenzhiv @ Jun 17 2006, 03:03 PM)
For your (or everyone else for that matter) information, i do agree that local universities do have a low standard, heck, i graduated from one of the local universites, but the standards from the university does not hold on to me. I've set my own standards and targets. Am i a low quality graduate?As far as i am concern, what i am working as now, i think i am not. Can i afford to study oversea?I can't but my parents can and they would if i wanted.

Bottom line is, doesnt matter where you study, uni creds, grades is just an assisting paper (ok, so it helps, quite alot) but what counts is your ability to convey the message that you are the one.

To the topic, i partially agree that that 3rd class = no value BUT depends on what course. IT, Engineering and like wise, not necessary but when it comes to detail subjects like geology, reseach work intense subjects/positions which require precise detailing and what not, it is very important what class you got.

cheers
*
Actually when it comes to Research & Development (R&D) position , the employer will prefer 1st class academic results. We all know that, I think we should LOL. It doesn't mean when you got 3rd class or pass degree you cannot work right ? The bottomline is try to find a job that suit yourself eg: academic results, personality and etc. Not all jobs require 1st class degree holder smile.gif
brokenomerta
post Jun 17 2006, 03:27 PM

Current Toy: MacBook Pro 13 2013
******
Senior Member
1,168 posts

Joined: Oct 2005
QUOTE(havenzhiv @ Jun 17 2006, 03:03 PM)
For your (or everyone else for that matter) information, i do agree that local universities do have a low standard, heck, i graduated from one of the local universites, but the standards from the university does not hold on to me. I've set my own standards and targets. Am i a low quality graduate?As far as i am concern, what i am working as now, i think i am not. Can i afford to study oversea?I can't but my parents can and they would if i wanted.

Bottom line is, doesnt matter where you study, uni creds, grades is just an assisting paper (ok, so it helps, quite alot) but what counts is your ability to convey the message that you are the one.

To the topic, i partially agree that that 3rd class = no value BUT depends on what course. IT, Engineering and like wise, not necessary but when it comes to detail subjects like geology, reseach work intense subjects/positions which require precise detailing and what not, it is very important what class you got.

cheers
*
couldnt agree more with what u say...setting one own's standard is what separated the men from the boys...and errr..woman from the girls as well? hahahaa.. tongue.gif

1st class in any universities, regardless where, will only get to the door...what do u do from there is basically on your own...that means 1st class honours will get u an interview...how do u perform from there on, its entirely up to u...

16 Pages « < 2 3 4 5 6 > » Top
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0213sec    0.55    5 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 19th December 2025 - 04:36 AM