What a bunch of modders that think those local modify workshop can come up with proper turbocharger that could generate optimum output, torque & FC? FYI, whatever those local modify workshops can do are limited to whatever custom kits they can bring in and tune from there. The piping are so badly done that they are not even as efficient as what car manufacturer can produce.

You can tune up the car to have more power but do not expect it to be as effective and efficient as those cars that come with turbocharger by default eg. Pug 508 1.6T, Mondeo 2.0T, BMW 2.0T, VW Passat 1.8T, etc. I call these cars that are sold with turbocharger well built with optimum efficiency. Optimum means able to focus on performance as well as FC & maintenance in long run.

Those owners who sent their non-turbo cars with NA engine to fit turbocharger at local modify workshops, those are nothing more than motorsport fun. In reality on FC saving or maintenance wise, they are nothing close to optimum.

Don't talk about Toyota, Honda turbocharger, they are not the best in this. You want to talk about efficient & optimum turbocharger, refer Ford, Pug, VW, BMW, Audi as these carmakers are more advanced in anyway. Japanese made are reliable but when comes to GDI engine, diesel engine, turbocharger/supercharger, NVH, handling and build quality, the conti are still ahead. Japanese made beat conti only in terms of sales, reliability & after sales service. They didn't beat conti in everything.

malas reply liao.

Already told u.. He knows everything..(at least he think)
He dun accept other ppl opinion or knowledge..
I did a comparison bit by bit for lancer GT 2011 and inspira 2011 , ecu mapping.. Told him was the same.. He says I lie..

He got serious Dunning-Kruger effect symptom also known as Jayraptor-Kyheng effect.

I see the map with my eyes.. work it with my hands...
He look at websites and brochure.. And he says he is correct and I lie .. So juz let him kok lor.. U use fact argue with him no point geh

I see the map with my eyes.. work it with my hands...
He look at websites and brochure.. And he says he is correct and I lie .. So juz let him kok lor.. U use fact argue with him no point geh

What a bunch of modders that think those local modify workshop can come up with proper turbocharger that could generate optimum output, torque & FC? FYI, whatever those local modify workshops can do are limited to whatever custom kits they can bring in and tune from there. The piping are so badly done that they are not even as efficient as what car manufacturer can produce.

You can tune up the car to have more power but do not expect it to be as effective and efficient as those cars that come with turbocharger by default eg. Pug 508 1.6T, Mondeo 2.0T, BMW 2.0T, VW Passat 1.8T, etc. I call these cars that are sold with turbocharger well built with optimum efficiency. Optimum means able to focus on performance as well as FC & maintenance in long run.

Those owners who sent their non-turbo cars with NA engine to fit turbocharger at local modify workshops, those are nothing more than motorsport fun. In reality on FC saving or maintenance wise, they are nothing close to optimum.

Don't talk about Toyota, Honda turbocharger, they are not the best in this. You want to talk about efficient & optimum turbocharger, refer Ford, Pug, VW, BMW, Audi as these carmakers are more advanced in anyway. Japanese made are reliable but when comes to GDI engine, diesel engine, turbocharger/supercharger, NVH, handling and build quality, the conti are still ahead. Japanese made beat conti only in terms of sales, reliability & after sales service. They didn't beat conti in everything.

Add 50kg metal bar will make any turbo car going efficient...fc oso better, smooth ride and neck-wrecking when in full takeout!

Right, jayraptor?

only applicable to Lancer GT yo

IMO..why turbo in an auto transmission car?

Never argue with stupid people jaycraptor, they he will drag you down to their his level and then beat you with experience stuff he read from brochure and websites.

I think, usually manufacturers' original setting is more pessimistic to cover the reliability in very harsh condition (tested in dessert or antarctic area), that some people got the ecu re-mapped to get better fuel consumption (maybe ignition timing earlier/air-fuel ratio to lean,... ), what ever car it is. Maybe some tuner is crap, but it should not be all.

back to the topic... so any good suggestion to plant in turbo for my Forte as well? I can't be losing out to a Dugong..