Inspira is a FF car.. U cant drift over the conners
This post has been edited by K3nnYkl82: Jul 13 2013, 03:52 PM
[WTA]Fiesta vs 208 vs Inspira vs Prius C, <RM90k car for Single late 20s male
|
|
Jul 13 2013, 03:51 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,479 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Mars |
Im telling u the arm are from mitsu .. U are telling mr back I changed it..
Inspira is a FF car.. U cant drift over the conners This post has been edited by K3nnYkl82: Jul 13 2013, 03:52 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
Jul 13 2013, 04:02 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,479 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Mars |
Sorry Mr jaycraptor.. you really crap too much i really beh tahan ..
let me teach u how to see .. here is a link of proton inspira part list .. Inspira Parts If you look at the parts ... 1234A567 (these are from mitsu) proton parts number are PW123456 Example 655 [All] Suspension Arm Front RH 4013A280 699 [All] Vehicle Tool Bag PW582025 5.77 okay . now i search the same thing online for u Online Parts Now you can go thru the parts ur self. Next i know you going to tell me SOMEONE CREATED THE PART LIST .. I dont do asumption ... i read base on fact! and i repeat .. inspira still a proton build quality .. but crap from you that the parts are localize.. |
|
|
Jul 13 2013, 04:04 PM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
83 posts Joined: May 2011 |
QUOTE(jayraptor @ Jul 13 2013, 03:41 PM) You are just trying to degrade the Lancer. If what you said is true, the Lancer will not be able to sell a single unit like Galant today. Don't try to create the false impression that the Inspira is exact clone of Lancer. The Inspira is a Lancer with P1 parts, ofcourse you can replace them anytime with Lancer parts. As for tuning, they are alll using the port and software, no problem using MMC diagnostic tools. Mr BullSh!t with long essay JayCraptor.FYI, Wira also can share Lancer '94 parts, Iswara/Saga can share Lancer '81 parts, Perdana also can share Galant '94 parts, Perdana V6 can share with Eterna V6 parts. No problem because the mounting remain unchange. If what you said true, wonder how come Inspira can't beat Lancer on racetrack where both are ori and unmodded? You want to prove which handling better, get 1 amateur to drive and take sharp turn at 100, 110, 120, 130, 140 and so on. Your Inspira will lose control before Lancer. If you are pro' you might be able use your drift skill to cover up but still if it's understeer, there's nothing you can do but wait for it to end before resume. so for your theory, korean build sh!t car in the past, they still producing sh!t car? as for laptime if u interested ![]() megalap.com » Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... « This post has been edited by nzh0920: Jul 13 2013, 04:05 PM |
|
|
Jul 13 2013, 04:08 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
403 posts Joined: Nov 2006 From: Johor/KL |
QUOTE(jayraptor @ Jul 13 2013, 02:24 PM) Late reply, just got back from site-job. This is to reply your Inspira vs Forte thread. There are things that could not be described here and would require you to try on the track to find out. Inspira and Lancer both using Multi-link but both are different quality and material. They are not the same, 1 from MMC and 1 from P1 Lotus. No wonder it is raining..... Example, there are 2 metal bars from 2 different manufacturers, sizes could be similar but weight, solidity, etc different still. Understand? When Perdana introduced, the Galant is allowed to be sold but it didn't get to sell anymore since Perdana introduced. People just don't think about Galant that is using the same platform as Perdana. They buy Perdana if can't afford Accord, Camry, Telstar or 626. This was before MMC being forced to cease operation in 1995 due to too poor sales in cars segment. Lancer is still alive today because it has what your Inspira doesn't have. This is fact, your Inspira is nothing close to Lancer other than physically the same. Whatever detune you say, in US, there is no such thing on the emission thingy. Seems like P1 protection forced our local MMC Lancer to be fitted with GL tuning so that they don't get to challenge Inspira sales. Hahahahahahaha both arms are arms but they are different material? Same design but weight different. Yes yes just like twins also got a bit difference? That's what u mean? Next sentence u mentioned, 1 from MMC 1 from P1 lotus? Now I am really interested. Can you somehow-anyhow with a kind-hearted share some "underground" source? |
|
|
Jul 13 2013, 04:08 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,479 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Mars |
|
|
|
Jul 13 2013, 04:12 PM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
115 posts Joined: Apr 2013 |
QUOTE(nzh0920 @ Jul 13 2013, 04:04 PM) Mr BullSh!t with long essay JayCraptor. nzh0920,so for your theory, korean build sh!t car in the past, they still producing sh!t car? as for laptime if u interested ![]() megalap.com » Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... « You took modified Inspira laptime vs NA Lancer? Look at your list, 1.6 Forte beats 2.0 Forte. What else, those are nothing more than unsorted category list. Is that the best lap time in the first place? People talking about NA unmodified car vs category. You go and include turbocharged or tuned up variant together. Take NA category list before you come here and talk crap. Koreans, they have moved further with dual VVT. You still stuck with single VVT? K3nnYkl82, Just the arm? How bout the rest then? People look into overall. FYI, the old Saga '06 I had, can still find hidden MMC logo on part of the car body. What is the big deal? Inspira is not Lancer, enough brag and get back to real life. |
|
|
|
|
|
Jul 13 2013, 04:13 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
649 posts Joined: Jun 2008 |
|
|
|
Jul 13 2013, 04:16 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,479 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Mars |
QUOTE(jayraptor @ Jul 13 2013, 04:12 PM) nzh0920, Bugger the whole list is there ... YOU ARE THE ONE TALKING ABOUT THE ARM PREVIOUSLY..You took modified Inspira laptime vs NA Lancer? Look at your list, 1.6 Forte beats 2.0 Forte. What else, those are nothing more than unsorted category list. Is that the best lap time in the first place? People talking about NA unmodified car vs category. You go and include turbocharged or tuned up variant together. Take NA category list before you come here and talk crap. Koreans, they have moved further with dual VVT. You still stuck with single VVT? K3nnYkl82, Just the arm? How bout the rest then? People look into overall. FYI, the old Saga '06 I had, can still find hidden MMC logo on part of the car body. What is the big deal? Inspira is not Lancer, enough brag and get back to real life. Go search how many PW parts there yourself ... i didnt says 100% mitsu parts .. but mechanical wise almost .. because manufacture cost to manufacure a metal part isnt cheap if u do not know already. We own inspira but we dont crap like you. Again i repeat .. lots of mitsu parts.. refer to the list .. 1234A567 is mitsu parts .. PW123456 is proton parts . and i repeat again workmanship is not as good as mitsu ![]() Again .. mr jaycraptor .. we talk base on fact .. not like u .. whenever ppl prove u wrong .u go twist .. and i already said .. inspira is tune more to comfort while lancer is towards sporty .. its nothing to do with the chassis like what you crap. |
|
|
Jul 13 2013, 04:17 PM
|
![]()
Junior Member
38 posts Joined: Jul 2006 |
QUOTE(jayraptor @ Jul 13 2013, 03:41 PM) You are just trying to degrade the Lancer. If what you said is true, the Lancer will not be able to sell a single unit like Galant today. Don't try to create the false impression that the Inspira is exact clone of Lancer. The Inspira is a Lancer with P1 parts, ofcourse you can replace them anytime with Lancer parts. As for tuning, they are alll using the port and software, no problem using MMC diagnostic tools. abang, saya beri abang pinjam saya punya lancer mahu? tapi driver inspira saya mahu jadi, boleh? abang ada inspira tak mahu kasi saya pinjam? atau abang ada lancer tak?FYI, Wira also can share Lancer '94 parts, Iswara/Saga can share Lancer '81 parts, Perdana also can share Galant '94 parts, Perdana V6 can share with Eterna V6 parts. No problem because the mounting remain unchange. If what you said true, wonder how come Inspira can't beat Lancer on racetrack where both are ori and unmodded? You want to prove which handling better, get 1 amateur to drive and take sharp turn at 100, 110, 120, 130, 140 and so on. Your Inspira will lose control before Lancer. If you are pro' you might be able use your drift skill to cover up but still if it's understeer, there's nothing you can do but wait for it to end before resume. |
|
|
Jul 13 2013, 04:22 PM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
83 posts Joined: May 2011 |
QUOTE(jayraptor @ Jul 13 2013, 04:12 PM) nzh0920, man , since u so like to compare brochure, please go and read the website before u make such FUNNY and STUPID comment and let people laugh at u You took modified Inspira laptime vs NA Lancer? Look at your list, 1.6 Forte beats 2.0 Forte. What else, those are nothing more than unsorted category list. Is that the best lap time in the first place? People talking about NA unmodified car vs category. You go and include turbocharged or tuned up variant together. Take NA category list before you come here and talk crap. Koreans, they have moved further with dual VVT. You still stuck with single VVT? K3nnYkl82, Just the arm? How bout the rest then? People look into overall. FYI, the old Saga '06 I had, can still find hidden MMC logo on part of the car body. What is the big deal? Inspira is not Lancer, enough brag and get back to real life. u think there is no rules and regulation ? u know nothing about track the list all NA lancer/inspira, u got turbo in your engine bay, u are in different category. STUPID! |
|
|
Jul 13 2013, 04:24 PM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
83 posts Joined: May 2011 |
|
|
|
Jul 13 2013, 04:25 PM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
83 posts Joined: May 2011 |
QUOTE(jayraptor @ Jul 13 2013, 04:12 PM) nzh0920, please show me the light, master of crap!You took modified Inspira laptime vs NA Lancer? Look at your list, 1.6 Forte beats 2.0 Forte. What else, those are nothing more than unsorted category list. Is that the best lap time in the first place? People talking about NA unmodified car vs category. You go and include turbocharged or tuned up variant together. Take NA category list before you come here and talk crap. Koreans, they have moved further with dual VVT. You still stuck with single VVT? K3nnYkl82, Just the arm? How bout the rest then? People look into overall. FYI, the old Saga '06 I had, can still find hidden MMC logo on part of the car body. What is the big deal? Inspira is not Lancer, enough brag and get back to real life. |
|
|
Jul 13 2013, 04:25 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,479 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Mars |
He dun even know 4B10 n 11, 12 comes with dual VVTI. propably dunno what it is
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jul 13 2013, 04:28 PM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
83 posts Joined: May 2011 |
QUOTE(jayraptor @ Jul 13 2013, 04:12 PM) nzh0920, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mitsubishi_4B1_engineYou took modified Inspira laptime vs NA Lancer? Look at your list, 1.6 Forte beats 2.0 Forte. What else, those are nothing more than unsorted category list. Is that the best lap time in the first place? People talking about NA unmodified car vs category. You go and include turbocharged or tuned up variant together. Take NA category list before you come here and talk crap. Koreans, they have moved further with dual VVT. You still stuck with single VVT? K3nnYkl82, Just the arm? How bout the rest then? People look into overall. FYI, the old Saga '06 I had, can still find hidden MMC logo on part of the car body. What is the big deal? Inspira is not Lancer, enough brag and get back to real life. please read here, craptor QUOTE continuously variable MIVEC intake and exhaust valve timing This post has been edited by nzh0920: Jul 13 2013, 04:29 PM |
|
|
Jul 13 2013, 04:28 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
649 posts Joined: Jun 2008 |
|
|
|
Jul 13 2013, 04:28 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
403 posts Joined: Nov 2006 From: Johor/KL |
QUOTE(jayraptor @ Jul 13 2013, 04:12 PM) nzh0920, Wah now is like how?You took modified Inspira laptime vs NA Lancer? Look at your list, 1.6 Forte beats 2.0 Forte. What else, those are nothing more than unsorted category list. Is that the best lap time in the first place? People talking about NA unmodified car vs category. You go and include turbocharged or tuned up variant together. Take NA category list before you come here and talk crap. Koreans, they have moved further with dual VVT. You still stuck with single VVT? K3nnYkl82, Just the arm? How bout the rest then? People look into overall. FYI, the old Saga '06 I had, can still find hidden MMC logo on part of the car body. What is the big deal? Inspira is not Lancer, enough brag and get back to real life. Loser "fatt LAN Zha"? LOL!!!! U damn power la really. Next time u can go another forum introduce yourself. I am not only famous in AW, but also lowyat fnf!!! Hahahahahaa |
|
|
Jul 13 2013, 04:32 PM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
115 posts Joined: Apr 2013 |
QUOTE(K3nnYkl82 @ Jul 13 2013, 04:16 PM) Bugger the whole list is there ... YOU ARE THE ONE TALKING ABOUT THE ARM PREVIOUSLY.. Nice comparison. Wonder why Lancer can still sell if your Inspira is that close to Lancer technically. Just because of build workmanship, people willing to pay >RM20k extra to get Lancer 2.0EX/GT rather than lower grade Inspira 2.0 at RM93k? Like you for example, you can spend less than RM10k to get Lancer bumpers, badges, steering wheels, etc already. Go search how many PW parts there yourself ... i didnt says 100% mitsu parts .. but mechanical wise almost .. because manufacture cost to manufacure a metal part isnt cheap if u do not know already. We own inspira but we dont crap like you. Again i repeat .. lots of mitsu parts.. refer to the list .. 1234A567 is mitsu parts .. PW123456 is proton parts . and i repeat again workmanship is not as good as mitsu ![]() Again .. mr jaycraptor .. we talk base on fact .. not like u .. whenever ppl prove u wrong .u go twist .. and i already said .. inspira is tune more to comfort while lancer is towards sporty .. its nothing to do with the chassis like what you crap. Tell this to Lancer owners whether they agree with you. Verdict about Inspira, nothing more than a lower quality Lancer wannabe. You can only be called LANCAR but not Lancer. This is the only reason why Lancer still survive today rather than wrap up like what happened back then. Like Myvi owners trying to think themselves as driving Toyota. Inspira owners are like dreaming of driving Japanese C-segment. This post has been edited by jayraptor: Jul 13 2013, 04:36 PM |
|
|
Jul 13 2013, 04:36 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,479 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Mars |
QUOTE(jayraptor @ Jul 13 2013, 04:32 PM) Nice comparison. Wonder why Lancer can still sell if your Inspira is that close to Lancer technically. Just because of build workmanship, people willing to pay >RM20k extra to get Lancer 2.0EX/GT rather than lower grade Inspira 2.0 at RM93k? Like you for example, you can spend less than RM10k to get Lancer bumpers, badges, steering wheels, etc already. EhTell this to Lancer owners whether they agree with you. Juz now u crap differently one.. U says many localize part Diff build quaility of the parts Now turn your dirrextion lagi ah? Mana ur localize part? Mana ur lancer gl chassis claim? Mana ur less parts in suspension systrm? Lancer gt 125k Inspira 86k 2.0E Thats almost 40k Yes I admit we cheapskate but the 40k doesnt worth thst to me.. |
|
|
Jul 13 2013, 04:42 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,479 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Mars |
Jaycraptor previous very proud tell ppl localize part a lot. Base on his experience with wira 1.6z
Then he claim suspension less some part that very hard to describe Further claim no emission control crap in USA Then claim build parts are of diff quality and material Now agree with me diff is towards workmanship or after sales service! Further more says I plan to tipu ppl with so call mitsu parts.... Sorry im not a fair journalist |
|
|
Jul 13 2013, 04:42 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
9,027 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Ipoh |
Sorry, I do not read the whole thread.
Many parts of Inspira are shared with Lancer, even though different in part number. Most of the parts, Proton simply mark up the price and end up much more expensive than Mitsubishi parts. From what I know, the headlamp of Inspira are different than Lancer, hence the price different. Price not same doesn't mean they are not the same. For suspension parts, afaik only absorbers are made locally (also why it so affordable). Everything else is the same as Lancer, also much more expensive than Lancer (marked up price). |
|
Topic ClosedOptions
|
| Change to: | 0.0528sec
0.64
7 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 12th December 2025 - 04:45 AM |