Pop corn mode...
I think is time I trade in my car and get forte...
If I get forte 1.6 and it cannot perform like u mention... I gonna be sad...
Keyboard warrior

DIAM LA BODO
who wants you crappy proton anyway

Seriously what kind of fair journalist is he?
Claim he knows car well..

He does not own d car

He ASSUME is a diff chassis due to lesser kerb weight
He ASSUME many parts are localize
He ASSUME local parts use diff material and diff quality
He ASSUME USA no such thing call emission control
He ASSUME rear suspension have lesser parts
He ASSUME its lotus handling
He ASSUME the part list are fake
He ASSUME there are many proton salesman here

He knows nothing about car, get his information from the web, make his own assumption, dun accept anything when ppl tell him.

No wonder he is famous in AW now he is famous in LYN.

He is as famous as Kinabatagan MP who said Qing Ming is the Chinese emperor who built Great Wall.

Honda City E and City S got different curb weight... Meaning the chassis also different ah ? I wonder Vios TRD and Vios G also different curb weight?

you still dont get it??
leser kerb weight means lesser part

Seriously memalukan bangsa dan negara

apa lu cakap i got paper to suppork me behind

Not u la.. U know I know who lo

U lancer wannabe with campro engine difference chassis with lancer because kerb weight is lesser because suspension have lesser parts because proton brochures say la. U proton salesman. Still wanna spread lies?

This post has been edited by kychong: Jul 14 2013, 03:01 PM

i tot he work for a bank ; according to a "fish"

btw i mean paper that said Lancer GL and Inspira has diff kerb weight

City E and S also diff chassis..

Wow, already 4 replies so far. I am glad that at least allenultra stayed professional and neutral, good job.

The rest replied with much hatred that they go personal. Why can't reply properly and fill in the blanks with hatred? You sellman or have business related to P1?

I managed to check this info from the same person who told the differences between Inspira & Lancer GT 2 years ago. Here's his reply:

When MMC & P1 signed the deal, it stated clearly, any technical parts that will lead to breakdown, engine blown, failed handling like Sylphy/Almera, or any issue that could damage MMC reputation.

The Inspira is based on the Lancer GL that can't sell well that was phased out earlier. In the assembly plant, the engine, gearbox, the suspension, electronic components/modules/sensors, interior dashboard, door panels brought in imported. The machine here does the stamping with the metal sheets imported. The rest of the parts that won't cause breakdown are done locally. Some are sub to local companies to produce the parts. Due to improper storage (space vacuum), the interior of Inspira not as fragrant as brand new Conti/Japanese/Korean cars inside. Smells like China made cars.

The P1 tuned suspension is only myth to show that they do produce something and the rear suspension is exact match of Lancer GL and not from Lancer GT.

Kerb weight:
Lancer 2.0GT 1385kg
Lancer 2.0GL 1320kg (reduced ingredient variant for 3rd nation)
Lancer 2.0GL 1335kg
Inspira 2.0 Premium 1335kg

Difference between Lancer GL & GT lies in the large METAL BAR that connects to both rear wheels arms. Relook into your replies earlier, don't know why you keep showing me the arm. Show the arm for what when people talking about the whole Multilink rear suspension? Have to use the word Metal Bar or Metal Beam or else you would refer elsewhere. Who knows, you might show me the tie rod in front in reply. That 50kg difference came from this metal bar alone. Understand? Mind you the bodykit, side skirt, & spoiler aren't heavy that even small kid could easily carry it with 1 hand. People use adhesive 2 sided tape specially for PU & fibreglass material for skirting nowadays. No more cement.

So stop saying your Inspira is Lancer GT. It's based on Lancer GL and that is why MMC willing to let P1 rebadge but under strict restriction and monitoring. This explains why Lancer GT sales still survive today. Many who can't afford new would buy used Lancer GT rather than buy that Inspira. Hassle free guaranteed

This post has been edited by jayraptor: Jul 14 2013, 05:41 PM

Seriously?

This post has been edited by edison1437: Jul 14 2013, 05:42 PM

Forte is meant for family use with handling for safety in evading dangerous road hazard and in time of emergency. The same goes to Lancer GL. The heavier and stiffer Lancer GT is meant for sports driving feel where you can take it to Sepang racetrack for little racing.

Padan muka....bought kereta busuk

Nvm I got armpit pure

Hmm....my friend just trade in his forte after driving it less than a year. I ask him why, he just reply me one word, "rubbish". Why ah?

U really one word to describe.. BoDoH.. Seriously..
Please go dig back what I said. I said absorbers and anti roll bar made by proton.
Mr Journalist.. Muli link suspension from left to right connected is called anti roll bar!! If u dont understand english.
Ops sorry.. Forte use torsion beam guess u never know what the fark is an antiroll bar. YOU YOUSELF SAYS THE METAL WHICH CONNECT THE TWO REAR ARMS! Mr genious! Again I repeat its call ANTI ROLL BAR!! And dig back the previous post I said! LANCER GT IS USING 20mm , LANCER GLS NON! Proton inspira 16mm (local made).. And MR GENIOUS! Go find me an anti roll bar that weights 50KG!

u keep making urself look like an idiot. So did u ask any diff in terms of engine gearbox of lancer gl and gt? And who the hell is ur source?

let me teach u something else. The thing that holds the arm together is call sub frame. The sub frame hold the left and right arm in place. The thing that hold the left and right arm together is call anti roll bar! And already I mention earlier made by proton. And again I said its a different tuning. Ur english fail I guess.