Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Bump Topic Topic Closed RSS Feed
123 Pages « < 109 110 111 112 113 > » Bottom

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 V11 - Property Prices Discussion, Intelligent debates only pls

views
     
Selectt
post Jul 14 2013, 03:10 PM

wattttt!!
******
Senior Member
1,709 posts

Joined: Aug 2009
QUOTE(Anon_1986 @ Jul 14 2013, 01:17 PM)
Sadly, it appears that few in Malaysia have real knowledge on what went on during the US housing bubble. South California was one of the wealthiest places in the US, and their median prices bottomed out at about RM 750k.

http://www.nuwireinvestor.com/articles/a-b...tate-53126.aspx
Here's a chart for you: http://www.doctorhousingbubble.com/wp-cont...home-prices.png

As I recall, Florida did around the same or worse than SoCal, but I can't spoonfeed all the details. Prices in both places are recovering, but we are after all 6 yrs from the peak, in an environment of zero interest rates and QE and many government initiatives to help homeowners, so the recovery is by design. Like I said, I was only seeking to correct a misunderstanding that desirable and wealthy places must always hold value in order to guide this forum's discussion back to the use of accurate facts and examples. Debt and liquidity is always the most important factor. You should be looking to places like London, NY and Sydney to justify why our values will maintain.

In any event, it is far fetched to suggest we will ever suffer a 50% crash (apart from multimillion luxury condos of course). Although it is clear to me that current pricing levels are not sustainable by our fundamentals, I do not subscribe to the belief that a  massive crash must necessarily follow. It is just one of many possible outcomes, and is dependent on a myriad of factors, political and economic, domestic and international. With so many factors at play, there is no way to predict with absolute certainty, so one must hedge their risks. My view is that holding too much debt at this point in time is foolhardy, as the chances that it may work out well is growing slimmer every day. The unfortunate fact which I distill from these forums is that many in Malaysia have no hope to achieve wealth aside from wagering away their lives (multiple 40 year mortgages) on the property market in the hope that prices will continue their upward spiral. I wish you all the best, although the very fact that there seems to be no feasible way to achieve wealth other than gambling on highly leveraged asset appreciation must tell you that something is seriously wrong with the economic fundamentals of this country.
*
i have a differing view. Do you have other articles, experiences or sharings on how other 1st world economy affect Malaysia? We just passed 2008 global recession, have you gotten any effect from that?

Agreed on the last paragraph.

This post has been edited by Selectt: Jul 14 2013, 03:45 PM
kohts
post Jul 14 2013, 03:25 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
276 posts

Joined: Apr 2011
It seems people now take 2008 as a causal thing. But it is so damn nerve racking at that time, with global economy in such shaky position due to subprime and toxic debts and banks comes falling down.

Kudos those who there to purchase at 2008 as it require great courage then.

Situation now is no where near that time, but having said that, opportunity is not as good as that time.

& global party is starting in next 2 years rclxm9.gif until everybody get crazy, get drunk and do something crazy.

Sobering time is over, you cant be sober and regret forever and now is time for economy booz and drugs

This post has been edited by kohts: Jul 14 2013, 03:27 PM
kohts
post Jul 14 2013, 03:31 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
276 posts

Joined: Apr 2011
QUOTE(Anon_1986 @ Jul 14 2013, 01:17 PM)
As I recall, Florida did around the same or worse than SoCal, but I can't spoonfeed all the details. Prices in both places are recovering, but we are after all 6 yrs from the peak, in an environment of zero interest rates and QE and many government initiatives to help homeowners, so the recovery is by design.
As pointed, sobering time over drool.gif party time now. hehehehe brows.gif
Selectt
post Jul 14 2013, 03:35 PM

wattttt!!
******
Senior Member
1,709 posts

Joined: Aug 2009
looks like this thread is filled with pessimist sentiments. Would appreciate if we all could share the actual experience during 2008 recession than rather sharing economy theory.
EddyLB
post Jul 14 2013, 03:45 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,864 posts

Joined: Apr 2011
QUOTE(Selectt @ Jul 14 2013, 02:52 PM)
can anybody explain why are we in the subprime, eurozone crisis discussion?

are we dependent on china economy? I dont think so.

Since the last time 2008 global recession, from my understanding, malaysia economy did not even budge and property market are still intact. Only certain industry sectors are affected, not all. We did not lose all of our jobs. It's just big companies cutting down expenses, freeze hiring, people have hard time to find jobs.
*
I like your style ! thumbup.gif

Where ? Where ? Where got ? I don't see it !!
ManutdGiggs
post Jul 14 2013, 03:46 PM

10k Club
********
All Stars
13,761 posts

Joined: Jun 2011
QUOTE(Selectt @ Jul 14 2013, 03:35 PM)
looks like this thread is filled with pessimist sentiments. Would appreciate if we all could share the actual experience during 2008 recession than rather sharing economy theory.
*
Many shared. But later on ll b accused of boosting or being an agent trying to push the price up. So many now hav chosen not to voice out any experience. Instead let the opposition do the cut & paste. Let them do the study like nerds. And of cos some ll assume all details econ.com r 100% 1 sided.

Cheer.
ManutdGiggs
post Jul 14 2013, 03:48 PM

10k Club
********
All Stars
13,761 posts

Joined: Jun 2011
QUOTE(EddyLB @ Jul 14 2013, 03:45 PM)
I like your style !  thumbup.gif

Where ? Where ? Where got ? I don't see it !!
*
Everywhere according to many negative minded people.
Selectt
post Jul 14 2013, 03:59 PM

wattttt!!
******
Senior Member
1,709 posts

Joined: Aug 2009
QUOTE(ManutdGiggs @ Jul 14 2013, 03:46 PM)
Many shared. But later on ll b accused of boosting or being an agent trying to push the price up. So many now hav chosen not to voice out any experience. Instead let the opposition do the cut & paste. Let them do the study like nerds. And of cos some ll assume all details econ.com r 100% 1 sided.

Cheer.
*
hi manu tkt, (follows back WTF writing style.. laugh.gif )

i get the hunch that those tkt cash out property at this time, may not be accurate.. I think prop still going up now. While it is wise to offload now, if market continues to be hot several years down the road, you still will park your money back to property, which in turns killing your previous profits...

m2c
lucerne
post Jul 14 2013, 04:01 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,946 posts

Joined: Aug 2009


QUOTE(ManutdGiggs @ Jul 14 2013, 03:46 PM)
Many shared. But later on ll b accused of boosting or being an agent trying to push the price up. So many now hav chosen not to voice out any experience. Instead let the opposition do the cut & paste. Let them do the study like nerds. And of cos some ll assume all details econ.com r 100% 1 sided.

Cheer.
*
agreed many real investors dare not to speak anymore..we can only exchange ideas via PM, what a pity...

Selectt
post Jul 14 2013, 04:03 PM

wattttt!!
******
Senior Member
1,709 posts

Joined: Aug 2009
QUOTE(ManutdGiggs @ Jul 14 2013, 03:48 PM)
Everywhere according to many negative minded people.
*
not sure if hes trying to be funny. Birds of a feather flock together ma...

/i m out of this thread. tq
ManutdGiggs
post Jul 14 2013, 04:12 PM

10k Club
********
All Stars
13,761 posts

Joined: Jun 2011
QUOTE(lucerne @ Jul 14 2013, 04:01 PM)
agreed many real investors dare not to speak anymore..we can only exchange ideas via PM, what a pity...
*
Its ok. 2 sides of a coin. The other side is less ppl ll know so much bout the tricks. Hence less competition gua.

Of cos many ll start claiming tat up camp ppl know lil and they themselves know too much. Of cos with all the articles and charts.
debbieyss
post Jul 14 2013, 04:17 PM

Look at all my stars! I want to be a SUPERSTAR!
*******
Senior Member
4,458 posts

Joined: Nov 2008
From: Kuala Lumpur


QUOTE(lucerne @ Jul 14 2013, 04:01 PM)
agreed many real investors dare not to speak anymore..we can only exchange ideas via PM, what a pity...
*
So what did the real investors say?

Can summarize a bit? Are they pessimistic or optimistic?
cwhong
post Jul 14 2013, 04:31 PM

Growth company seeker ..... :)
*******
Senior Member
4,342 posts

Joined: Apr 2010
From: The place that i call home :p

My circle of friends still bullish abt props, esp iskandar area........ Follow by KL (inner kl, just outside of CBD)
XtraLeoGecko
post Jul 14 2013, 04:33 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
902 posts

Joined: May 2012


Hello guys, I'm new in property (since last year only), so can't say much but can only refer to report & data (or facts, assume they are true?! rclxub.gif ):

http://napic.jpph.gov.my/portal/content/Pu...HRM_Q1_2013.pdf

Just look at the fact:
The Malaysian House Price Index increased by 6.0% in Q1 2013 relative to Q1 2012 rclxm9.gif icon_question.gif doh.gif mad.gif shocking.gif sweat.gif
sting79
post Jul 14 2013, 04:39 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
123 posts

Joined: Nov 2006



QUOTE(Anon_1986 @ Jul 14 2013, 01:17 PM)
Sadly, it appears that few in Malaysia have real knowledge on what went on during the US housing bubble. South California was one of the wealthiest places in the US, and their median prices bottomed out at about RM 750k.

http://www.nuwireinvestor.com/articles/a-b...tate-53126.aspx
Here's a chart for you: http://www.doctorhousingbubble.com/wp-cont...home-prices.png

As I recall, Florida did around the same or worse than SoCal, but I can't spoonfeed all the details. Prices in both places are recovering, but we are after all 6 yrs from the peak, in an environment of zero interest rates and QE and many government initiatives to help homeowners, so the recovery is by design. Like I said, I was only seeking to correct a misunderstanding that desirable and wealthy places must always hold value in order to guide this forum's discussion back to the use of accurate facts and examples. Debt and liquidity is always the most important factor. You should be looking to places like London, NY and Sydney to justify why our values will maintain.

In any event, it is far fetched to suggest we will ever suffer a 50% crash (apart from multimillion luxury condos of course). Although it is clear to me that current pricing levels are not sustainable by our fundamentals, I do not subscribe to the belief that a  massive crash must necessarily follow. It is just one of many possible outcomes, and is dependent on a myriad of factors, political and economic, domestic and international. With so many factors at play, there is no way to predict with absolute certainty, so one must hedge their risks. My view is that holding too much debt at this point in time is foolhardy, as the chances that it may work out well is growing slimmer every day. The unfortunate fact which I distill from these forums is that many in Malaysia have no hope to achieve wealth aside from wagering away their lives (multiple 40 year mortgages) on the property market in the hope that prices will continue their upward spiral. I wish you all the best, although the very fact that there seems to be no feasible way to achieve wealth other than gambling on highly leveraged asset appreciation must tell you that something is seriously wrong with the economic fundamentals of this country.
*
Well written on the last paragraph thumbup.gif

Wanted to share a fact on this statement "The unfortunate fact which I distill from these forums is that many in Malaysia have no hope to achieve wealth aside from wagering away their lives (multiple 40 year mortgages) on the property market in the hope that prices will continue their upward spiral."

Went to HSBC to inquire on the available structured investments. They have implemented few months back a new rule on the minimum requirements to invest in such equities:
"3 This investment is only applicable for individuals with at least ONE of the following criteria met:
Total net personal assets, not inclusive of the value of primary residence, exceeds MYR3, 000,000 or its equivalent in foreign currencies; OR
Investor’s and spouse’s combined net personal assets, not inclusive of the value of primary residence, exceeds MYR3,000,000 or its equivalent in foreign currencies; OR
Investor’s gross annual income for past 12 months exceeds MYR300, 000 or its equivalent in foreign currencies; OR
Investor’s and spouse’s combined gross annual income for past 12 months exceeds MYR400, 000 or its equivalent in foreign currencies;"

So I asked the manager, why the new rule? Isn't that going to push away a lot of potential investors, which is bad news for HSBC?

He replied saying that this is passed down by BNM, along the statement "Based on past statistics on such structured investments, we don't want those who bet their whole piggy bank savings come suing us when this investment gives a negative returns or early withdrawal. We only want those who can really afford to invest with us. So with this new policy, it prevents the mass market from taking legal actions against HSBC if anyone lied on the earning capability or net worth (need to sign when taking this investment).

What the above tells me on why BNM pass down this requirement to HSBC: the mass market are not earning huge salaries, but yet are willing to gamble their savings or take big bets when don't have the financial backup to take the fall. BNM realizes this and wanted to reduce the impact, because this type of equity is purely speculative (it is based on past statistics) which is kinda similar to property.

Also apart from business owners, one of the easier way for salaried workers to earn huge paychecks is to be in O&G or IB industry. It's irritating when advice is given based on their own experiences, which IMHO does not apply to majority as the risk is simply huge. And it is not helping when advice is taken and many are buying properties for flipping purposes (cepat kaya skim wink.gif ). Shouldn't we instead focus on other areas of improvement?
kidmad
post Jul 14 2013, 05:39 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
4,482 posts

Joined: Jul 2005
from this point onwards ill choose not to debate bout it. Let time tell and let's see. lol no point with all this debate when what's been told is not happening.

Anyway any idea what's the drawback of leasehold as compared to freehold? Would like to know does leasehold will have some issue for others to finance in the future? Gonna be buying KOI KINRARA for my own stay.. earnest deposit gonna be paid tomorrow. Went to that place and love the environment inside.. Not as good as sterling in kelana but i still think for RM430k it's still okay..
kidmad
post Jul 14 2013, 05:42 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
4,482 posts

Joined: Jul 2005
QUOTE(sting79 @ Jul 14 2013, 04:39 PM)
Well written on the last paragraph  thumbup.gif

Wanted to share a fact on this statement "The unfortunate fact which I distill from these forums is that many in Malaysia have no hope to achieve wealth aside from wagering away their lives (multiple 40 year mortgages) on the property market in the hope that prices will continue their upward spiral."

Went to HSBC to inquire on the available structured investments. They have implemented few months back a new rule on the minimum requirements to invest in such equities:
"3 This investment is only applicable for individuals with at least ONE of the following criteria met:
    Total net personal assets, not inclusive of the value of primary residence, exceeds MYR3, 000,000 or its equivalent in foreign currencies; OR
    Investor’s and spouse’s combined net personal assets, not inclusive of the value of primary residence, exceeds MYR3,000,000 or its equivalent in foreign currencies; OR
    Investor’s gross annual income for past 12 months exceeds MYR300, 000 or its equivalent in foreign currencies; OR
    Investor’s and spouse’s combined gross annual income for past 12 months exceeds MYR400, 000 or its equivalent in foreign currencies;"

So I asked the manager, why the new rule? Isn't that going to push away a lot of potential investors, which is bad news for HSBC?

He replied saying that this is passed down by BNM, along the statement "Based on past statistics on such structured investments, we don't want those who bet their whole piggy bank savings come suing us when this investment gives a negative returns or early withdrawal. We only want those who can really afford to invest with us. So with this new policy, it prevents the mass market from taking legal actions against HSBC if anyone lied on the earning capability or net worth (need to sign when taking this investment).

What the above tells me on why BNM pass down this requirement to HSBC: the mass market are not earning huge salaries, but yet are willing to gamble their savings or take big bets when don't have the financial backup to take the fall. BNM realizes this and wanted to reduce the impact, because this type of equity is purely speculative (it is based on past statistics) which is kinda similar to property.

Also apart from business owners, one of the easier way for salaried workers to earn huge paychecks is to be in O&G or IB industry. It's irritating when advice is given based on their own experiences, which IMHO does not apply to majority as the risk is simply huge. And it is not helping when advice is taken and many are buying properties for flipping purposes (cepat kaya skim wink.gif ). Shouldn't we instead focus on other areas of improvement?
*
What kind of investment? Don't sound like a mortgage loan requirement to me.
Anon_1986
post Jul 14 2013, 05:55 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
252 posts

Joined: Jun 2012
QUOTE(kidmad @ Jul 14 2013, 05:39 PM)
from this point onwards ill choose not to debate bout it. Let time tell and let's see. lol no point with all this debate when what's been told is not happening.

Anyway any idea what's the drawback of leasehold as compared to freehold? Would like to know does leasehold will have some issue for others to finance in the future? Gonna be buying KOI KINRARA for my own stay.. earnest deposit gonna be paid tomorrow. Went to that place and love the environment inside.. Not as good as sterling in kelana but i still think for RM430k it's still okay..
*
Singapore gives a good example of leasehold values because the place is littered with 99 yr HDB units. Basically value holds up until the leasehold hits 85-90 years, and then it starts declining rapidly vis a vis freehold.
kidmad
post Jul 14 2013, 06:03 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
4,482 posts

Joined: Jul 2005
QUOTE(Anon_1986 @ Jul 14 2013, 05:55 PM)
Singapore gives a good example of leasehold values because the place is littered with 99 yr HDB units. Basically value holds up until the leasehold hits 85-90 years, and then it starts declining rapidly vis a vis freehold.
*
Anon that's not a good comparison... Your comparing an island which is 450 times smaller than malaysia.

A 20 years old leasehold unit in malaysia can we still finance up to 90%? I'm wondering.. My colleague were telling me can get 85% only and the older it is the lower it will be... true?
AVFAN
post Jul 14 2013, 06:47 PM

20k VIP Club
*********
All Stars
24,454 posts

Joined: Nov 2010
QUOTE(XtraLeoGecko @ Jul 14 2013, 04:33 PM)
Hello guys, I'm new in property (since last year only), so can't say much but can only refer to report & data (or facts, assume they are true?!  rclxub.gif ):

http://napic.jpph.gov.my/portal/content/Pu...HRM_Q1_2013.pdf

Just look at the fact:
The Malaysian House Price Index increased by 6.0% in Q1 2013 relative to Q1 2012  rclxm9.gif  icon_question.gif  doh.gif  mad.gif  shocking.gif  sweat.gif
*
yep, that is true, according to the data for all country.

take a closer look at diff prop types, diff states, change from 4q12.

if I read rite, condos outside kl not doing so well, houses in kelang, gombak not so good too, district petaling ok.

bungalows n smds softening.

then again, one quarter says little, we wait...again!



btw, if appr is 6% pa, r u happy with it?

123 Pages « < 109 110 111 112 113 > » Top
Topic ClosedOptions
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0281sec    0.34    6 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 8th December 2025 - 11:18 PM