Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Bump Topic Topic Closed RSS Feed
127 Pages « < 34 35 36 37 38 > » Bottom

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

Photography The Official Nikon Discussion Thread Ver.19, D7100 announced weeeee~

views
     
KTCY
post Mar 3 2013, 02:00 AM

BumbleBee™
********
All Stars
12,505 posts

Joined: May 2007
From: Triumph in the Skies Status:In LoV3 Again
QUOTE(alpha_company @ Mar 3 2013, 01:50 AM)
You can see the seriousness of the problem.. he sold it within 2 weeks.. I could have sold it within a month if I had a buyer then, but needed to wait another month for a buyer. You would NOT see the problem when testing it at the shop... unless you can take specific kinds of test shots at the shop and transfer the images into a PC/laptop and look at it. Yeah right...

Like I explained before in my previous post, dont be surprised if some said it is a great lens. They tested it out on a ONE subject at mostly wide open apertures. IT"S JUST IMPOSSIBLE to see it at those settings.Yeah this lens is great at wide open (sharpness,colour) but the reviewers who saw this problem tested it on numerous other things/subjects including a focus chart at various apertures. I just dont know why nikon produced such a flawed lens. Im not so surprised as around the same time they produced the D600 with the dust problem which is a PHYSICAL defect/design & D800 with the left focus point issue. I can understand software/firmware defects but if its physical, especially if it's the insides of the camera or lens.. i'm much better off buying older proven technology.

Yes, exactly.. field curvature does that but the most horrible thing is when this two guys come together : FIELD CURVATURE & FOCUS SHIFT .. Double trouble. I explained it in my previous post. You'll know pain when you take group shots and the center is soft/blurred, the guy standing on the SAME LINE at the left & right is sharp, the guy on the THIRD LINE is sharpest .. WTF?

You can find a used AFD 35 f2... the lens is tough enough cause it doenst have an af motor. a used AF 35mm f2 (non-D) will be much cheaper. Both will AF fine on your camera.

FYI, the OLD Nikon 85mm 1.4D is still in production.. the OLD Nikon 50 1.8D is still in production.. the OLD Nikon 20 2.8D is still in production. Guess what? The 35D is still in production.. why? market wise if this lens was discontinued, what other 35mm prime can you buy for FX? The AFS 35 1.4G? you know how much that costs? Nikon doesnt want people to buy to Sigma/Tamron lenses..they need variety in their product line (price wise).

Dont think Nikon will fix it? Man.. if you buy new, it has a warranty card. THEY WILL FIX IT.

Resale value of the 35D? Around 700-900 depends on age/condition/warranty etc..
*
I sold my 1yr+ near to 2 yr 35D around 900 biggrin.gif

btw, 24/1.4G good ? tongue.gif
alpha_company
post Mar 3 2013, 02:07 AM

One Hand Punch Mega
*******
Senior Member
4,016 posts

Joined: Mar 2005
From: ★MALAYSIA★ Status: Photographing



QUOTE(KTCY @ Mar 3 2013, 02:00 AM)
I sold my 1yr+ near to 2 yr 35D around 900 biggrin.gif

btw, 24/1.4G good ? tongue.gif
*
Muahahahah... if the lens cost 1.2k ..how much lower can it go down lah kann.. haha.. lucky lah u rugi a bit only..dont know y some people worry too much..hehe..

Nikon needs to stop the production of the OLD 24 2.8D so that everybody can buy the 24 1.4G... cause Nikon knows that everybody has lombong emas belakang rumah.. thumbup.gif
pspslim007
post Mar 3 2013, 02:17 AM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
701 posts

Joined: Apr 2010
From: Malaysia


QUOTE(ongdennis @ Mar 2 2013, 11:26 PM)
nothing wrong rite?
if u have u have 50mm f1.4 and still want to get 50mm f1.8 then maybe a bit...
*
QUOTE(KTCY @ Mar 3 2013, 01:35 AM)
used to own both. Nothing stupid
*

thank you for taking your time to reply my post , its hard to get replies for questions in here ><
KTCY
post Mar 3 2013, 02:56 AM

BumbleBee™
********
All Stars
12,505 posts

Joined: May 2007
From: Triumph in the Skies Status:In LoV3 Again
QUOTE(alpha_company @ Mar 3 2013, 02:07 AM)
Muahahahah... if the lens cost 1.2k ..how much lower can it go down lah kann.. haha.. lucky lah u rugi a bit only..dont know y some people worry too much..hehe..

Nikon needs to stop the production of the OLD 24 2.8D so that everybody can buy the 24 1.4G... cause Nikon knows that everybody has lombong emas belakang rumah.. thumbup.gif
*
I bought 1050 only blush.gif tongue.gif

so 24/1.4G good la ? tongue.gif
freddy manson
post Mar 3 2013, 06:32 AM

ðñê hêll ð£ å gµ¥
*******
Senior Member
4,858 posts

Joined: Jun 2006
From: Tawau, Sabah



QUOTE(KTCY @ Mar 3 2013, 02:56 AM)
I bought 1050 only blush.gif tongue.gif

so 24/1.4G good la ? tongue.gif
*
priced at 5k++ sure good one!!
Silverfire
post Mar 3 2013, 10:38 AM

Cruxiaer
*******
Senior Member
4,947 posts

Joined: Nov 2007



Chester See @ iM4U!
user posted image

Jason Chen
user posted image

David Choi
user posted image

This post has been edited by Silverfire: Mar 3 2013, 01:11 PM
Decky
post Mar 3 2013, 01:20 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,190 posts

Joined: Dec 2008
QUOTE(alpha_company @ Mar 3 2013, 01:50 AM)
You can see the seriousness of the problem.. he sold it within 2 weeks.. I could have sold it within a month if I had a buyer then, but needed to wait another month for a buyer. You would NOT see the problem when testing it at the shop... unless you can take specific kinds of test shots at the shop and transfer the images into a PC/laptop and look at it. Yeah right...

Like I explained before in my previous post, dont be surprised if some said it is a great lens. They tested it out on a ONE subject at mostly wide open apertures. IT"S JUST IMPOSSIBLE to see it at those settings.Yeah this lens is great at wide open (sharpness,colour) but the reviewers who saw this problem tested it on numerous other things/subjects including a focus chart at various apertures. I just dont know why nikon produced such a flawed lens. Im not so surprised as around the same time they produced the D600 with the dust problem which is a PHYSICAL defect/design & D800 with the left focus point issue. I can understand software/firmware defects but if its physical, especially if it's the insides of the camera or lens.. i'm much better off buying older proven technology.

Yes, exactly.. field curvature does that but the most horrible thing is when this two guys come together : FIELD CURVATURE & FOCUS SHIFT .. Double trouble. I explained it in my previous post. You'll know pain when you take group shots and the center is soft/blurred, the guy standing on the SAME LINE at the left & right is sharp, the guy on the THIRD LINE is sharpest .. WTF?

You can find a used AFD 35 f2... the lens is tough enough cause it doenst have an af motor. a used AF 35mm f2 (non-D) will be much cheaper. Both will AF fine on your camera.

FYI, the OLD Nikon 85mm 1.4D is still in production.. the OLD Nikon 50 1.8D is still in production.. the OLD Nikon 20 2.8D is still in production. Guess what? The 35D is still in production.. why? market wise if this lens was discontinued, what other 35mm prime can you buy for FX? The AFS 35 1.4G? you know how much that costs? Nikon doesnt want people to buy to Sigma/Tamron lenses..they need variety in their product line (price wise).

Dont think Nikon will fix it? Man.. if you buy new, it has a warranty card. THEY WILL FIX IT.

Resale value of the 35D? Around 700-900 depends on age/condition/warranty etc..
*
Alright man, I've checked with alot of other people, they attribute the problem to focus and refocusing as well.

And since I'm going to be doing that alot on the d600 whose focus points are all in the center of the frame...


I think I'll get the 35 f2D or the 50mm 1.8g

alpha_company
post Mar 3 2013, 01:55 PM

One Hand Punch Mega
*******
Senior Member
4,016 posts

Joined: Mar 2005
From: ★MALAYSIA★ Status: Photographing



QUOTE(freddy manson @ Mar 3 2013, 06:32 AM)
priced at 5k++ sure good one!!
*
you reffering to 2nd hand price ar?
Silverfire
post Mar 3 2013, 03:09 PM

Cruxiaer
*******
Senior Member
4,947 posts

Joined: Nov 2007



QUOTE(Decky @ Mar 3 2013, 01:20 PM)
Alright man, I've checked with alot of other people, they attribute the problem to focus and refocusing as well.

And since I'm going to be doing that alot on the d600 whose focus points are all in the center of the frame...
I think I'll get the 35 f2D or the 50mm 1.8g
*
When focusing moving object really kinda sucky, but maybe that's because I'm using shitty lens anyway laugh.gif
b5n111
post Mar 3 2013, 03:22 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
52 posts

Joined: Oct 2009


QUOTE(KTCY @ Mar 3 2013, 03:56 AM)
I bought 1050 only blush.gif tongue.gif

so 24/1.4G good la ? tongue.gif
*
thou this fellow s huge and heavy but itz a good lens!

1050 s a super value purshase thumbup.gif
teetaatee
post Mar 3 2013, 03:48 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,061 posts

Joined: Jul 2011
another 2 biggrin.gif

user posted image
IMG_4132 by Song laa, on Flickr

user posted image
IMG_4129 by Song laa, on Flickr
pspslim007
post Mar 3 2013, 04:00 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
701 posts

Joined: Apr 2010
From: Malaysia


erm i got question regarding sd card , is there any partiular brand i should buy , or i just aim for the cheapest with high speed like a sandisk 32gb with 10 speed ? i am curious because i bought my panasonic 8gb 6 speed quite expensive than the sandisk . please help .
celciuz
post Mar 3 2013, 04:15 PM

10k Club
********
All Stars
14,037 posts

Joined: Nov 2004
QUOTE(pspslim007 @ Mar 3 2013, 04:00 PM)
erm i got question regarding sd card , is there any partiular brand i should buy , or i just aim for the cheapest with high speed like a sandisk 32gb with 10 speed ? i am curious because i bought my panasonic 8gb 6 speed quite expensive than the sandisk . please help .
*
Always get a reliable memory card, brands like Sandisk and Lexar are reputable. But then again, not all models are equal. Sandisk Ultra should be the bare minimum. I would use Extreme or Extreme Pro.
gerald7
post Mar 3 2013, 04:45 PM

r a n d o m l y
*******
Senior Member
2,453 posts

Joined: Nov 2007
From: Kuching, Sarawakland


QUOTE(celciuz @ Mar 3 2013, 04:15 PM)
Always get a reliable memory card, brands like Sandisk and Lexar are reputable. But then again, not all models are equal. Sandisk Ultra should be the bare minimum. I would use Extreme or Extreme Pro.
*
+1

fully agree
BlizzardCraft
post Mar 3 2013, 05:07 PM

ChiakChiak
******
Senior Member
1,562 posts

Joined: May 2012


QUOTE(pspslim007 @ Mar 3 2013, 04:00 PM)
erm i got question regarding sd card , is there any partiular brand i should buy , or i just aim for the cheapest with high speed like a sandisk 32gb with 10 speed ? i am curious because i bought my panasonic 8gb 6 speed quite expensive than the sandisk . please help .
*
look at ur camera model... there's a max write speed.. for me i got the Extreme 45mbps rather than the extreme 95mbps to achieve maximum burst rate... 95mbps would give me extra 1 shots burst only since the write speed of my D7k capped at around 50mbps i think... got website to check out the test of diff memory card 1
Pro3363
post Mar 3 2013, 06:11 PM

Aiming high to stay flying
Group Icon
Elite
1,193 posts

Joined: Aug 2011
From: Miri, Sarawak



SPAM! rclxm9.gif

user posted image
Flower by Pro3363, on Flickr

user posted image
Flower by Pro3363, on Flickr
Silverfire
post Mar 3 2013, 06:45 PM

Cruxiaer
*******
Senior Member
4,947 posts

Joined: Nov 2007



iM4U!
user posted image

Jason Chen
user posted image

Chester See
user posted image

David Choi
user posted image

Marianne
user posted image

Reuben
user posted image

This post has been edited by Silverfire: Mar 3 2013, 06:46 PM
KTCY
post Mar 3 2013, 07:07 PM

BumbleBee™
********
All Stars
12,505 posts

Joined: May 2007
From: Triumph in the Skies Status:In LoV3 Again
QUOTE(Silverfire @ Mar 3 2013, 06:45 PM)
iM4U!
user posted image

Jason Chen
user posted image

Chester See
user posted image

David Choi
user posted image

Marianne
user posted image

Reuben
user posted image
*
70-200 VR II ?
saw that you have 24mm too. 24-85 ?
Silverfire
post Mar 3 2013, 07:10 PM

Cruxiaer
*******
Senior Member
4,947 posts

Joined: Nov 2007



QUOTE(KTCY @ Mar 3 2013, 07:07 PM)
70-200 VR II ?
saw that you have 24mm too. 24-85 ?
*
Tamron 70-200 2.8 non VC laugh.gif

Nah, I don't have a 24mm. I use a 18-55 DX @ 24 to get rid of the pinhole vignetting.

This post has been edited by Silverfire: Mar 3 2013, 07:10 PM
gerald7
post Mar 3 2013, 07:15 PM

r a n d o m l y
*******
Senior Member
2,453 posts

Joined: Nov 2007
From: Kuching, Sarawakland


user posted image
120607-Tokyo-055 by Cybreed, on Flickr

This post has been edited by gerald7: Mar 3 2013, 07:16 PM

127 Pages « < 34 35 36 37 38 > » Top
Topic ClosedOptions
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0321sec    0.74    6 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 17th December 2025 - 08:34 AM